This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sader, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sader, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2008, p. 1153-1155, Vol. 52, No. 3
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01351-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antimicrobial Activities of Ceftaroline and ME1036 Tested against Clinical Strains of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus{triangledown}

Helio S. Sader,1,2* Thomas R. Fritsche,1 and Ronald N. Jones1,3

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa,1 Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil,2 Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts3

Received 19 October 2007/ Returned for modification 1 December 2007/ Accepted 21 December 2007

Two investigational anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (anti-MRSA) β-lactams, ceftaroline (a cephalosporin) and ME1036 (a carbapenem), were subjected to susceptibility testing by reference broth microdilution methods using 152 strains of community-acquired MRSA from the United States (47 medical centers). Ceftaroline and ME1036 were 64- and >128-fold more potent than ceftriaxone, respectively. All isolates had the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV, while 67.8% of isolates displayed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis clonal type USA300-0114.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: JMI Laboratories, 345 Beaver Kreek Centre, Suite A, North Liberty, IA 52317. Phone: (319) 665-3370. Fax: (319) 655-3371. E-mail: helio-sader{at}jmilabs.com

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 7 January 2008.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2008, p. 1153-1155, Vol. 52, No. 3
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01351-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Moisan, H., Pruneau, M., Malouin, F. (2010). Binding of ceftaroline to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother : dkp503v1-dkp503 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Llarrull, L. I., Fisher, J. F., Mobashery, S. (2009). Molecular Basis and Phenotype of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Insights into New {beta}-Lactams That Meet the Challenge. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 4051-4063 [Full Text]  
  • Morrissey, I., Biek, D., Janes, R. (2009). ME1036, a novel carbapenem, with enhanced activity against clinical isolates causing bacteraemic community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 209-210 [Full Text]  
  • Vidaillac, C., Leonard, S. N., Sader, H. S., Jones, R. N., Rybak, M. J. (2009). In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Alone and in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens, Including {beta}-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2360-2366 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fenoll, A., Aguilar, L., Robledo, O., Gimenez, M.-J., Granizo, J.-J., Biek, D., Tarrago, D. (2008). In vitro activity of ME1036 versus other {beta}-lactams against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes exhibiting higher amoxicillin than penicillin MIC. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 1156-1158 [Full Text]