Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2009, p. 4172-4177, Vol. 53, No. 10
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00051-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain,1 Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain,2 Pharmacy Service, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain,3 Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain4
Received 14 April 2009/ Returned for modification 19 April 2009/ Accepted 9 July 2009
This study evaluated the activity of daptomycin combined with either gentamicin or rifampin against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates in vitro and one isolate in vivo against a representative strain (MRSA-572). Time-kill experiments showed that daptomycin was bactericidal against these strains at concentrations over the MIC. Daptomycin at sub-MIC concentrations plus gentamicin at 1x and 2x the MIC yielded synergy, while the addition of rifampin at 2 to 4 µg/ml resulted in indifference (two strains) or antagonism (one strain). The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight once a day) was evaluated ± gentamicin (1 mg/kg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h [q8h]) or rifampin (300 mg i.v. q8h) in a rabbit model of infective endocarditis by simulating human pharmacokinetics. Daptomycin plus gentamicin (median, 0 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] log10 CFU/g vegetation) was as effective as daptomycin alone (0 [0 to 2] log10 CFU/g vegetation) in reducing the density of bacteria in valve vegetations (P = 0.83), and both were more effective than daptomycin plus rifampin (3 [2 to 3.5] log10 CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.05) for the strain studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized a ratio of vegetations that was similar to that of daptomycin plus gentamicin (10/15 [67%] versus 9/15 [60%]; P = 0.7), and both regimens did so more than daptomycin plus rifampin (3/15 [20%]; P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). No statistical difference was noted between daptomycin plus gentamicin and daptomycin alone for MRSA treatment. In the combination arm, all isolates from vegetations remained susceptible to daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin. Sixty-one percent of the isolates (8/13) acquired resistance to rifampin during monotherapy. In the daptomycin arm, resistance was detected in only one case, in which the daptomycin MIC rose to 2 µg/ml among the recovered bacteria. In conclusion, the addition of gentamicin or rifampin does not enhance the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to MRSA.
Published ahead of print on 20 July 2009.
Members of the Hospital Clínic Endocarditis Study Group, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain, include the following: from the Infectious Diseases Service, J. M. Miró, A. Moreno, A. del Río, C. Cervera, X. Castañeda, and J. M. Gatell; from the Microbiology Service, F. Marco, C. García-de-la-Mària, Y. Armero, M. Almela, and M. T. Jiménez de Anta; from the Cardiovascular Institute, C. A. Mestres, J. C. Paré, C. Falces, R. Cartañá, S. Ninot, M. Azqueta, M. Sitges, M. Heras, and J. L. Pomar; from the Pathology Department, J. Ramírez, and T. Ribalta; from the Toxicology Service, M. Brunet; from the Pharmacy Service, D. Soy; and from UASP, E. de Lazzari.
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»