AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 April 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01110-07v1
52/7/2300    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lodise, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Drusano, G. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lodise, T. P., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Drusano, G. L.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.01110-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Telavancin Penetration into Human Epithelial Lining Fluid as Determined by Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Monte Carlo Simulation

Thomas P. Lodise Jr.*, Mark Gotfried, Steven Barriere, and George L. Drusano

Albany College of Pharmacy, Albany, New York; Ordway Research Institute, Albany, New York; Pulmonary Associates, Phoenix, Arizona; and Theravance, Inc., South San Francisco, California

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: lodiset{at}acp.edu.


   Abstract

Background: Telavancin is an investigational bactericidal lipoglycopeptide with a multifunctional mechanism of action, as demonstrated against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). While the plasma pharmacokinetics have been described, drug penetration in the lung, measured by the epithelial lining fluid (ELF), remains unknown. Population modeling and Monte Carlo simulation were employed to estimate the ELF penetration of telavancin.

Methods: Plasma and ELF pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 20 healthy volunteers, and the pharmacokinetic samples were assayed with a validated liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry technique. Concentration-time profiles in plasma and ELF were simultaneously modeled using a three-compartment model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination and transfer. The model parameters were identified in a population pharmacokinetic analysis (BigNPAG). Monte Carlo simulation of 9999 subjects was performed to calculate the ELF/plasma penetration ratios by estimating the AUCELF and free AUCPlasma from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) after a single dose.

Results: After the Bayesian step, the overall fits of the model to the data were good and plots of predicted versus observed concentrations for plasma and ELF showed slopes and intercepts very close to the ideal values of 1.0 and 0.0, respectively. The median AUCELF/free AUCPlasma penetration ratio was 0.73, and the 25th and 75th percentile value ratios were 0.43 and 1.24, respectively.

Conclusion: In non-infected lung tissue, the median AUC in ELF is approximately 75% of the free drug AUC in plasma.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.