Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 1998, p. 173-175, Vol. 42, No. 1
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Activity of Sanfetrinem and Affinity for
the Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Streptococcus
pneumoniae
Farid
Sifaoui,1
Emmanuelle
Varon,1
Marie-Dominique
Kitzis,2 and
Laurent
Gutmann1,*
L.R.M.A., Université Paris VI, 75270 Paris Cedex 06,1 and
Hôpital
Saint-Joseph, Service de Bactériologie, 75674 Paris Cedex
14,2 France
Received 2 May 1997/Returned for modification 1 August
1997/Accepted 28 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Against penicillin-susceptible pneumococci, the activity of
sanfetrinem was similar to those of penicillin, amoxicillin,
cefotaxime, imipenem, and meropenem, while against penicillin-resistant
strains, sanfetrinem and the carbapenems exhibited superior activity
(MICs at which 90% of strains are inhibited,
1 µg/ml). PBP 1a in
the penicillin-susceptible strain and PBP 1a and PBP 2b in the more resistant isolates seemed to be the essential penicillin-binding proteins for imipenem and sanfetrinem.
 |
TEXT |
The increasing number of
penicillin-resistant strains and their resistance to multiple
antibiotics complicates the strategy for the treatment of pneumococcal
infections such as otitis media (4). Thus, compounds with
bactericidal activity superior to those in current use are needed.
Among the
-lactam antibiotics, compounds which have comparable MICs
may differ greatly in their bactericidal potencies: penicillin and
carbapenem can rapidly kill and lyse pneumococcal strains, while
cephalosporins have only poor lytic activity (5, 6).
In this study, we determined the in vitro susceptibilities
of penicillin-susceptible, intermediately
penicillin-resistant, and penicillin-resistant strains of
Streptococcus pneumoniae to the first member of a new class
of oral tricyclic
-lactam compounds (trinems), sanfetrinem (formerly
GV104326) (3, 11, 12). We also studied its affinity for the
penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of selected strains and its
bactericidal and lytic activities.
The bacteriostatic effect of sanfetrinem against 70 clinical isolates
with different levels of resistance to penicillin was compared with
those of other
-lactam antibiotics (Table
1). MICs were determined on
Mueller-Hinton agar containing 5% horse blood, with a Steers
replicator device delivering 104 to 105 CFU per
spot. The MICs were read after 18 h at 37°C. Against the
penicillin-susceptible strains, the activity of sanfetrinem was similar
to those of penicillins, cefotaxime, meropenem, and imipenem. Against
penicillin-resistant strains, the carbapenems and sanfetrinem
exhibited superior activity, particularly against highly
penicillin-resistant strains, with MICs at which 90% of strains are
inhibited (MIC90s) of
1 µg/ml. Sanfetrinem was in general twofold less active than imipenem against the resistant strains, with its activity being intermediate between those of imipenem
and meropenem. These results are in agreement with those recently
reported (11, 12).
The lytic and bactericidal activities of sanfetrinem were studied
against three selected strains. S. pneumoniae R6 is a
susceptible derivative of the unencapsulated Rockefeller University
strain R36A; S. pneumoniae 4387 and S. pneumoniae
4411 are intermediately penicillin-resistant and penicillin-resistant
clinical isolates, respectively (10); both strains belong to
serotype 23F. The strains were grown at 37°C in Todd-Hewitt broth
supplemented with 0.5% (final concentration) yeast extract (Difco
Laboratories, Detroit, Mich). Growth and lysis were monitored by
measuring the optical density at 620 nm (OD620). When an
absorbance of 0.30 to 0.35 was reached (107 to
108 CFU/ml), penicillin G, imipenem, or sanfetrinem was
added at a concentration of four times the MIC. Viable bacteria were
counted 2 and 4 h after antibiotic addition by plating
appropriately diluted cultures into Columbia agar containing 5% horse
blood.
The mode of action of penicillin has been extensively studied
(13). Moreillon et al. (8) showed that the
bactericidal effect of penicillin can result from the triggering of two
independent systems: the autolytic system (Lyt+) which
involves an amidase, the major pneumococcal autolysin, and an
autolysin-independent system (Cid+) involving
cid determinant, the role of which is not known. Significant lysis was obtained at four times the MIC of each antibiotic (Fig. 1) for penicillin-susceptible strain R6
and intermediately penicillin-resistant strain 4387, but the lysis was
more pronounced for the latter strain. A significant bactericidal
effect was associated with lysis, which resulted in a decrease of at
least 4 log CFU after 4 h and which again was more pronounced for
strain 4387. Interestingly, the three compounds showed only slight
lytic effects against penicillin-resistant strain 4411, while their
bactericidal effects were still significant and nearly reached that
obtained for R6. Similar results were obtained with each antibiotic at
eight times the MIC, while at twice the MIC, each compound was slightly
less effective (data not shown). According to the classification of
Moreillon and colleagues (8, 9), these results suggest that,
as for strain R6, the intermediately penicillin-resistant strain 4387, which is lysed by
-lactams, is of the Tol
(nontolerant) Lyt+ Cid+ phenotype, while the
penicillin-resistant strain 4411, which was lysed only in the presence
of Triton X-100 due to the presence of amidase (data not shown),
appears to be tolerant (Tol+) and therefore to be of the
Tol+ Lyt+ Cid+ phenotype. It was
previously shown that among the
-lactam antibiotics, penems and
carbapenems have superior lytic and bactericidal activities against
S. pneumoniae (1, 2, 6, 12), even against
tolerant strains (Tol+ Lyt
Cid+
and Tol+ Lyt+ Cid
) (1, 6,
7). This also seems to be the case for the trinem sanfetrinem.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Lysis curves and killing curves showing the effects of
sanfetrinem (SAN), imipenem (IMI), and penicillin G (PEN) against the
susceptible pneumococcal reference strain R6 ( ; MICs: penicillin,
0.015 µg/ml; imipenem, 0.003 µg/ml; sanfetrinem, 0.003 µg/ml),
intermediately resistant strain 4387 ( ; MICs: penicillin, 0.125 µg/ml; imipenem, 0.03 sanfetrinem, 0.03 µg/ml), and
penicillin-resistant strain 4411 ( ; MICs: penicillin, 2 µg/ml;
imipenem, 0.25 µg/ml; sanfetrinem, 0.5 µg/ml). Antibiotics at four
times the MIC were added at time zero. The control culture ( )
received no antibiotic.
|
|
Analysis of PBPs was done exactly as described previously
(10) by using [3H]benzylpenicillin (26 Ci/mmol), which was a generous gift from Rhône-Poulenc-Rorer
Research (Vitry sur Seine, France). These conditions allowed for the
optimal separation of three PBPs, PBPs 2x, 2a, and 2b. To obtain a
better separation of PBP 1a and PBP 1b, an acrylamide/bisacrylamide
ratio of 30:0.8 with a 10% separating gel was used. Competition
experiments with increasing concentrations of imipenem or sanfetrinem
showed that in susceptible strain R6, 50% saturation of PBP 1a and PBP
3 was obtained close to the MICs of these antibiotics (Table 2), while
in intermediately resistant strain 4387 and resistant strain 4411, 50%
saturation of PBP 1a and PBP 2b was observed under these conditions.
Therefore, PBP 1a in
penicillin-susceptible strain R6 and both PBP 1a and PBP 2b in the more
resistant isolates are the most likely essential PBPs for imipenem and
sanfetrinem. Finally, the preferential target for sanfetrinem, as for
many
-lactam antibiotics (14), appears to be PBP 1a.
Since PBP 2b has been involved as a major target for triggering lysis
in the presence of penicillin (15), this would explain why
lysis was already observed at twice the MIC for the Tol
Lyt+ Cid+ intermediately resistant strain 4387. In the case of the Tol+ Lyt+ Cid+
resistant strain 4411, the process which should trigger lysis is
probably independent of the level of PBP saturation (8). Concerning susceptible strain R6, one might think that saturation of
both PBP 1a and PBP 3 was sufficient to trigger lysis.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Fifty percent saturation of PBPs of susceptible strain
S. pneumoniae R6, intermediately resistant strain
S. pneumoniae 4387, and resistant strain S. pneumoniae 4411 expressed as a multiple of the MIC of imipenem
and sanfetrinem
|
|
In conclusion, since sanfetrinem, a new oral trinem, showed a
bactericidal effect at concentrations very close to its MIC, it may be
of use for the treatment of pneumococcal infections, particularly
otitis media, provided that it reaches adequate levels to eradicate
intermediately and fully penicillin-resistant pneumococci.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Glaxo Wellcome for financial support and C. Harcour for
secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address:
L.R.M.A./Université Paris VI, 15, rue de l'Ecole de
Médecine, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France. Phone: 33-1-42.34.68.63. Fax: 33-1-43.25.68.12. E-mail: gutmann{at}ccr.jussieu.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Azoulay-Dupuis, E.,
V. Rieux,
C. Sauve,
C. Rivier, and E. Vallée.
1995.
Killing of penicillin and cefotaxime resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains by some -lactams and a glycopeptide according to tolerance of the strains, abstr. 2231. In
In
19th International Congress on Chemotherapy, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
|
| 2.
|
Cormican, M. G., and R. N. Jones.
1995.
Evaluation of the in-vitro activity of furopenem (SY5555 or SUN5555) against respiratory tract pathogens and -lactamase producing bacteria.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
35:535-539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Di Modugno, E.,
I. Erbetti,
L. Ferrari,
G. Galassi,
S. M. Hammond, and L. Xerri.
1994.
In vitro activity of the tribactam GV104326 against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2362-2368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Friedland, I. R., and G. H. McCracken, Jr.
1994.
Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
N. Engl. J. Med.
331:377-382[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Hakenbeck, R.,
S. Tornette, and N. F. Adkinson.
1987.
Interaction of non-lytic -lactams with penicillin-binding proteins in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
133:755-760[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
| Jabes, D., and A. Tomasz. 1989. Lytic and
bactericidal activity of FCE 22101. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
23(Suppl. C):75-83.
|
| 7.
|
Liu, H., and A. Tomasz.
1985.
Penicillin tolerance in multiply drug-resistant natural isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
J. Infect. Dis.
152:365-372[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Moreillon, P.,
Z. Markiewics,
S. Nachman, and A. Tomasz.
1990.
Two bactericidal targets for penicillin in pneumococci: autolysis-dependent and autolysis-independent killing mechanisms.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:33-39[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Moreillon, P., and A. Tomasz.
1988.
Penicillin resistance and defective lysis in clinical isolates of pneumococci: evidence for two kinds of antibiotic pressure operating in the clinical environment.
J. Infect. Dis.
157:1150-1157[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Sifaoui, F.,
M. D. Kitzis, and L. Gutmann.
1996.
In vitro selection of one-step mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to different oral -lactam antibiotics is associated with alterations of PBP 2x.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:152-156[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Singh, K. V.,
T. M. Coque, and B. E. Murray.
1996.
In vitro activity of the trinem sanfetrinem (GV104326) against gram-positive organisms.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2142-2146[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Spangler, S. K.,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1997.
MIC and time-kill studies of antipneumococcal activity of GV 118819X (sanfetrinem) compared with those of other agents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:148-155[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Tomasz, A.
1986.
Penicillin-binding proteins and the antibacterial effectiveness of -lactam antibiotics.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
8:S260-S278.
|
| 14.
|
Williamson, R.,
R. Hakenbeck, and A. Tomasz.
1980.
In vivo interaction of -lactam antibiotics with the penicillin-binding proteins of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
18:629-637[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Williamson, R., and A. Tomasz.
1985.
Inhibition of cell wall synthesis and acylation of the penicillin binding proteins during prolonged exposure of growing Streptococcus pneumoniae to benzylpenicillin.
Eur. J. Biochem.
151:475-483[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 1998, p. 173-175, Vol. 42, No. 1
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nagai, K., Davies, T. A., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2002). Effects of Amino Acid Alterations in Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) 1a, 2b, and 2x on PBP Affinities of Penicillin, Ampicillin, Amoxicillin, Cefditoren, Cefuroxime, Cefprozil, and Cefaclor in 18 Clinical Isolates of Penicillin-Susceptible, -Intermediate, and -Resistant Pneumococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 1273-1280
[Abstract]
[Full Text]