Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1998, p. 2932-2937, Vol. 42, No. 11
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases,
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San
Antonio, Texas 78284-78811;
Department
of Pathobiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine,
University of Washington, and Seattle Biomedical Research Institute,
Seattle, Washington, 981092; and
Institut de Microbiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland3
Received 23 March 1998/Returned for modification 5 June
1998/Accepted 25 August 1998
Resistance to fluconazole is becoming an increasing problem in the
management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in human
immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Strains obtained from five
patients developed decreased fluconazole susceptibility over
time. DNA strain typing confirmed the high degree of relatedness among
isolates from one patient and the variability among isolates from
different patients. Expression of genes involved in development of
fluconazole resistance was monitored in each isolate using probes
specific for ERG11 (lanosterol
14 Resistance to fluconazole and other
azole antifungal drugs has become an important clinical problem in the
management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected
patients with recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) (17,
20). Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular
mechanisms leading to azole resistance in Candida albicans,
the main etiologic agent of OPC, suggest the multifactorial nature of
resistance. Alterations in the target enzyme
(lanosterol 14 In the present study, we have investigated the expression of C. albicans ERG11 (encoding lanosterol 14 Clinical samples and isolates.
C. albicans isolates
were obtained by direct swab or by oral saline rinses from five
HIV-infected patients with recurrent OPC enrolled in a longitudinal
study to assess significance of fluconazole resistance (Table 1).
Patients were treated initially with fluconazole at 100 mg/day. Doses
were increased up to 800 mg/day in an effort to achieve therapeutic
response after development of clinical resistance. In all five
patients, sequential isolates showed decreased susceptibility to
fluconazole, and in all five patients, therapeutic response was
achieved by increasing the dose of fluconazole to a range of 200 to 800 mg/day (Table 1). In this study, clinical resistance was defined as the
clinical requirement for increasing fluconazole doses for response.
Resistance refers to mycological, in vitro resistance, which was the
detection of increased MICs. The identity of these clinical isolates as C. albicans was confirmed by standard biochemical and
microbiological procedures, including carbohydrate assimilation
patterns (API 20C; Analytab Products, BioMerieux, France), germ tube
formation in serum-containing medium, and color of colonies in
chromogenic medium (CHROMagar Candida, CHROMagar, Paris, France).
Isolates were stored at room temperature as suspensions in sterile
water and subcultured onto plates containing Sabouraud dextrose agar 48 h prior to propagation in YEPD medium (2% yeast extract, 1% peptone, 2% glucose).
Strain identification.
Strain identity was established by
karyotyping, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and DNA
fingerprinting using the moderately repetitive probe Ca3 (a gift from
D. Soll, University of Iowa) as previously described (18,
26). Briefly, chromosomes from the different isolates were
prepared in agarose plugs and separated by pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). RFLP patterns were
generated by digestion of genomic DNA with SfiI
(Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.). After documentation, the
materials present in the RFLP gels were transferred to nylon membranes
(Nytran; Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.) and hybridized with a Ca3
probe radioactively labeled by random priming (Random Primers DNA
Labeling System; Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.). The membranes were then
washed and exposed to autoradiography film (Du Pont, Wilmington, Del.).
Drug susceptibility testing and MIC determinations.
Initial
fluconazole susceptibility at the time of primary isolation was
determined by an agar dilution method as described previously by our
group (14, 15). Antifungal susceptibilities to fluconazole,
itraconazole, and amphotericin B were determined by the National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards standard procedures using
macrobroth techniques and reading the endpoints at 48 h
(13).
Northern (RNA) blot analysis.
Total RNA from the different
isolates grown to mid-logarithmic phase in YEPD medium was obtained by
using the RNAeasy mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita, Calif.)
following the manufacturer's instructions. Equal amounts
(approximately 5 µg) of RNA as determined by
A260 measurements were separated by
electrophoresis (21) and subsequently transferred to nylon
membranes (Nytran; Schleicher & Schuell) using the Turboblotter
apparatus (Schleicher & Schuell). Probes for ERG11,
MDR1, and CDR genes were purified from plasmids containing inserts of the respective genes as described before (31). The resulting CDR probe is based on the
whole sequence of CDR1 and has been shown to cross-hybridize
with other members of this gene family (24, 25, 31). Probes
specific for CDR1 and CDR2 genes were prepared as
described by Sanglard and coworkers (24) by PCR
amplification from plasmids containing these sequences (pDS243 and
pDS246 for CDR1 and CDR2, respectively), with the following primers: primers 5'-GAG ATC TAC CCT TTA AGA TA (forward) and
5'-TCT GAA TCG GGA TTC AAT TG (reverse) for CDR1 and primers 5'-GGTATATAAACTGGACAACA (forward) and
5'-CGGAATCTGGGTCTAATTGT (reverse) for CDR2. The
identity between the two resulting probes at the level of nucleotide
sequence was below 50%. All probes were labeled by random priming
(Random Primers DNA Labeling System; Gibco-BRL), and hybridizations
were performed with Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham Life Science Inc.,
Arlington Heights, Ill.) following the manufacturer's instructions.
After hybridization, blots were washed and exposed to autoradiography
film (Du Pont). Nylon membranes were probed sequentially with the
different probes following stripping the previously bound probe with
95°C-heated 1× SSC buffer (1× SSC is 0.15 M sodium chloride plus 15 mM sodium citrate [pH 7.0]) with 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate twice
for 15 min. For densitometric analysis, autoradiograms were scanned
with the Adobe Photoshop program (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View,
Calif.), and signals were quantitated with Dendron (Solltech Inc.,
Oakdale, Iowa). Relative values were adjusted for differences in sample
loading based on quantification of 18S rRNA levels. For preparation of figures, digital images were processed by using the Adobe Photoshop program.
PCR amplification and sequencing.
The ERG11 genes
encoding lanosterol 14 Clinical response.
Patients were treated initially with
fluconazole at 100 mg/day and with increased doses of up to 800 mg/day
if necessary for clinical resolution after development of refractory
disease. In all five patients, clinical resistance to initial doses
occurred, requiring increased doses of fluconazole (Table
1). However, therapeutic responses were
seen in all patients with increased fluconazole doses. Table 1 shows
the sequential isolates from each patient, the elapsed period between
times of isolation, the dose of fluconazole required, the cumulative
dose of fluconazole, prior regimens with other azoles, and the MICs for
fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B as determined by a
macrodilution method by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards techniques. The initial isolate of the series for each
patient was fluconazole susceptible (MIC of
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Distinct Patterns of Gene Expression Associated with Development
of Fluconazole Resistance in Serial Candida albicans
Isolates from Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients with
Oropharyngeal Candidiasis
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-demethylase), MDR1 (a major facilitator), and CDR (ATP-binding cassette or ABC transporter) genes.
Increased expression of CDR genes was detected in the
series of isolates from two patients. Isolates from one of the two
patients also demonstrated increased ERG11 expression,
whereas isolates from the other patient did not. Increased levels of
MDR1 mRNA correlated with increased resistance in
sequential isolates from another patient. Initial overexpression of
MDR1 with subsequent overexpression of CDR
genes and a final isolate again overexpressing MDR1 were detected in serial isolates from another patient. In another patient, overexpression of these genes was not detected despite an eightfold increase in fluconazole MIC. In this patient, sequence data of the
ERG11 gene revealed no point mutations associated with
decreased susceptibility. Five different patterns of gene expression
were observed in isolates recovered from five patients who developed resistance. Therefore, these experiments demonstrate that a variety of
mechanisms or combinations of mechanisms are associated with the
development of fluconazole drug resistance. Additional studies are
needed to estimate the frequency and clinical impact of these mechanisms of resistance.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-demethylase), including point mutations
(10, 11, 22, 28, 32) and overexpression
(31), lead to decreased susceptibilities to azole drugs.
Increased efflux of drug, mediated by multidrug pumps belonging to two
different families, the major facilitators and the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, also confers resistance to azole antifungal agents
(1, 23-25, 29, 31). The genes coding for several ABC
transporters in C. albicans have been identified, including several CDR genes (2, 16, 24, 25, 30). These ABC
transporters, which have been associated with drug resistance in a
variety of eukaryotic cells, include a membrane pore composed of
transmembrane segments and two ATP-binding cassettes on the cytosolic
side of the membrane, which provide the energy source for the pump
(3, 7). The MDR1 gene (also called
BENr) is the only gene coding for a major
facilitator that has been identified in C. albicans so far
(5), and its overexpression leads to fluconazole resistance
exclusively among azole drugs (23, 25, 31). The major
facilitators contain a transmembrane pore but use proton motive force
as their energy source (12).
-demethylase,
formerly designated ERG16 [8, 9]),
MDR1, and CDR genes in sequential clinical
isolates obtained from HIV-infected patients with OPC in order to
assess the distribution and frequency of various mechanisms responsible
for the development of antifungal drug resistance and their clinical impact.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-demethylase from several isolates
were amplified by PCR. Genomic DNA from the different isolates was
extracted with YeaStar Genomic DNA (Zymo Research, Orange, Calif.) and
used as a template for amplification of ERG11 genes. PCR was
carried out with high-fidelity Pwo DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim) using the following primers: 5'-GTT GAA ACT GTC
ATT GAT GG (forward) and 5'-TCA GAA CAC TGA ATC GAA AG (reverse).
Amplicons were purified with Wizard PCR Preps (Promega, Madison, Wis.),
and their nucleotide sequences for both strands were determined by
primer elongation with an ABI automated DNA sequencer (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
8 µg/ml) (13,
19). Cross-resistance between itraconazole and fluconazole was
detected in isolates from patients 7, 14, and 43 with an 8- to 16-fold
increase in itraconazole resistance in the final isolates. Only one
isolate from patient 40 showed decreased susceptibility to
itraconazole, whereas all other isolates had the same or increased
susceptibility to itraconazole relative to that of the first isolate
obtained. On the other hand, all isolates from patient 9 remained
susceptible to itraconazole (MIC of
0.125 µg/ml) despite increasing
fluconazole MICs. All isolates remained susceptible to amphotericin B.
TABLE 1.
Serial isolates of C. albicans from patients
with OPCa
|
Expression of ERG11, MDR1, and CDR genes in clinical isolates. Total RNA extracted from the different isolates growing in YEPD medium in the absence of antifungal drug was analyzed by a Northern blot technique with probes specific for ERG11, MDR1, and CDR genes (Fig. 2).
|
-demethylase was sequenced to detect point mutations which may
have resulted in decreased fluconazole susceptibility. ERG11
genes from these isolates were obtained by PCR. Single fragments of the
expected length (1.6 kb) were obtained in each case. Compared to a
published ERG11 sequence (9), a total of seven
silent (not resulting in amino acid substitutions) nucleotide changes
were found in isolate 580. ERG11 sequences from isolates 649 and 2438 were identical and showed a total of 10 base differences
compared to the published sequence. For these two isolates, the only
nucleotide change that had an effect in the amino acid sequence was the
single amino acid substitution V437I. However, we have detected this
same substitution in ERG11 genes from susceptible C. albicans isolates (data not shown). In addition, Sanglard and
colleagues (22) have shown by functional expression of these
genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that this mutation does
not confer resistance to fluconazole. Therefore, the mechanism(s) of
increased drug resistance for the third isolate (isolate 2438) is unknown.
Six sequential isolates from patient 40 were included in the study.
Northern blot analysis revealed that levels of ERG11 mRNA remained constant for all isolates examined, including the first and
third isolates that were sensitive to fluconazole (isolates 1490 and
1622; MIC = 0.5 µg/ml). Strong expression of MDR1 in the second (isolate 1587; fluconazole MIC = 8 µg/ml) and fourth (1780; MIC = 16 µg/ml) isolates with less expression in the
first (1490), third (1622), and sixth (2512) isolates mirrored MIC
results with the exception of the sixth isolate, which required the
highest fluconazole MIC (32 µg/ml) but did not exhibit the strongest
MDR1 expression. In isolate 1780 (fluconazole MIC = 16 µg/ml), increased message for MDR1 was accompanied by
overexpression of CDR genes (by a factor of 2.5). A twofold
increase in CDR message with no overexpression of
MDR1 was detected in the fifth isolate (2225; fluconazole
MIC = 4 µg/ml).
Isolates from patient 43 showed overexpression of
CDR genes (by a factor of approximately 10 for
both the second and third isolates in the series relative to the first
isolate). In the case of the second isolate (isolate 1831; fluconazole
MIC = 8 µg/ml), but not the third, more resistant isolate
(2183; fluconazole MIC > 128 µg/ml) of the series, this change
was accompanied by a moderate increase in ERG11 message. For
all isolates from patient 43, MDR1 expression was below
the detection limit.
Differentiation between levels of expression of CDR1 and CDR2. In order to discriminate between CDR1 and CDR2 gene expression, specific probes for CDR1 and CDR2 were used in Northern blots of total RNA extracted from sequential isolates from the different patients (Fig. 3). These experiments revealed that these two genes were simultaneously overexpressed in all cases in which CDR overexpression was observed. CDR1 was expressed constitutively but at low levels in azole-susceptible strains and overexpressed as azole resistance developed (isolates 1907 and 2307 from patient 7, isolates 1780 and 2225 from patient 40, and isolates 1831 and 2183 from patient 43). Levels of CDR2 mRNA were below detection limits in the same azole-susceptible isolates (with the exception of isolate 580, from patient 14, which required a fluconazole MIC of 4 µg/ml), and overexpressed in more-resistant isolates from patients 7 (isolates 1907 and 2307), 40 (isolates 1780 and 2225), and 43 (isolates 1831 and 2183). The relative CDR2 mRNA levels were equal to those of CDR1 in isolate 1907 (MIC = 8 µg/ml) and exceeded those of CDR1 in highly resistant isolates 2307 and 2183 (MICs >128 µg/ml) by factors of 1.5 and 1.2, respectively. Conversely, CDR1 mRNA levels exceeded those of CDR2 in all other, less resistant, isolates.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increasing reports of clinical and mycological fluconazole resistance in C. albicans have lead to the examination of the molecular mechanisms responsible for development of decreased fluconazole susceptibility. Under selective pressure from treatment with fluconazole, yeast cells can generate resistance through a variety of mechanisms (27, 33). Factors contributing to resistance include alterations in the target enzyme, including overexpression and point mutations, and increased efflux of drug mediated by ABC transporters and major facilitators (33). These studies have been performed in vitro, and their clinical significance is still unknown (1, 4, 10, 30). A limited number of studies support the role of these mechanisms in the development of C. albicans resistance in a small number of clinical isolates (11, 22, 23, 25, 31, 32). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency in which specific, known mechanisms of resistance occurred in series of isolates with decreasing fluconazole susceptibility recovered from OPC patients followed longitudinally.
In all five patients studied, isolation of strains with decreased fluconazole susceptibility was associated with clinical resistance requiring increased fluconazole doses for clinical response. However, it should be noted that clinical response to fluconazole was achieved in all five patients with increased doses of drug. Similar dose-dependent responses have been reported with OPC and decreased fluconazole susceptibility (17, 19).
Increased mRNA levels for ERG11, MDR1, and CDR genes are associated with resistance (1, 24, 25, 31). In the present study, we have evaluated expression of these genes in C. albicans isolates from HIV-infected patients with OPC. A total of 20 isolates from five different patients were included in this study. Successive isolates from one patient were determined to represent the same strain by three molecular typing methods. Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates recovered from successive OPC episodes in each patient indicated that progressive decrease in fluconazole susceptibility occurred during the longitudinal study. No one mechanism was predominant for the development of drug resistance in all isolates. The mode of acquisition of drug resistance by a particular mechanism or mechanisms for isolates from the different patients was complex. In a series of isolates from two patients (patients 7 and 43), overexpression of CDR genes (both CDR1 and CDR2) was associated with the development of resistance. This increase was obvious even in the second isolate of each series, with fluconazole MICs still in the susceptible range (8 µg/ml), which could possibly indicate a tendency toward development of resistance. In one of these patients (patient 7), increased CDR expression was accompanied by increased ERG11 expression, which was not the case in patient 43. In the case of patient 43, we speculate that other undetermined mechanisms of resistance could have combined with CDR overexpression in the third, highly resistant isolate (as compared to the second, still susceptible isolate), since CDR mRNA levels were similar for both isolates and could not explain the dramatic increase in fluconazole MIC observed for the third isolate.
Increased mRNA levels for MDR1 were detected in two isolates with decreased fluconazole susceptibility (MIC = 16 µg/ml) from patient 9 compared to prior susceptible isolates. These isolates, however, remained itraconazole susceptible. An alternation in overexpression of MDR1 and CDR genes was detected in isolates from another patient (patient 40), suggesting the presence of unstable phenotypes in the same strain with progression of infection due to the selective pressure of the antifungal treatment.
No clear correlation between expression of these genes and development of fluconazole resistance was observed in isolates from patient 14, where expression of CDR genes (mainly CDR1) seemed to decrease, rather than increase, in the final, less susceptible isolate. Sequencing of the ERG11 genes from isolates from this patient revealed the absence of point mutations that could result in decreased susceptibility to azole drugs; and thus, another, yet uncharacterized, mechanism(s) may be responsible for their decreased susceptibility. Thus, for these five patients, five different patterns of resistance were detected, suggesting that C. albicans isolates develop resistance through a variety of molecular mechanisms and that the acquisition of fluconazole resistance is complex.
In at least one case (patient 7), cumulative changes in the expression of genes related to fluconazole resistance appeared to be responsible for decreased susceptibilities to the drug during progression of infection. However, in other cases, a single mechanism seemed to be clearly dominant and intimately associated with development of resistance (e.g., MDR overexpression in patient 9). Overall, these experiments confirm previous results suggesting a major role for efflux pumps in the development of resistance to azoles. In addition, others have demonstrated that ERG11 overexpression alone does not account for high-level azole resistance (1, 25, 31). Since the present study is limited to the study of genes known to be involved in fluconazole resistance, it should be noted that other yet unrecognized mechanisms may be operational in this series of isolates and may contribute to the overall decrease in fluconazole susceptibilities (22).
In C. albicans, the CDR genes constitute a large multigene family coding for highly related proteins (2, 24, 25, 30). Some, but not all, members of this family are associated with resistance to antifungal drugs. CDR1 and CDR2 were the first two members of this family associated with drug resistance in C. albicans, and both CDR1 and CDR2 have been reported to play a role in fluconazole resistance (24, 25, 31). The probe used in the initial experiments to monitor expression of CDR genes was based on the whole sequence of CDR1 and has been shown to cross-hybridize with other members of this gene family, including CDR2 (24, 25, 31). Preparation of probes specific for CDR1 and CDR2 allowed differentiation of the expression of these two highly related genes belonging to the same multigene family. Increased mRNA levels for both CDR1 and CDR2 were detected in those resistant isolates found to overexpress CDR genes (compare Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). CDR1 was constitutively expressed at low levels in susceptible isolates, but CDR2 mRNA was absent in the same susceptible isolates (i.e., isolate 412 from patient 7 and isolates 1490 and 1622 from patient 40). Moreover, as previously reported (24), levels of expression of CDR2 were greater than or equal to those of CDR1 in highly resistant isolates. These results confirmed those of Sanglard and coworkers on the participation of both CDR1 and CDR2 in the development of fluconazole resistance in clinical isolates, as well as the different patterns of expression observed for both genes (24, 25).
Consistent with previous observations (23, 25, 31), overexpression of CDR genes resulted in decreased susceptibility to other azole drugs (i.e., patients 7 and 43), whereas increased MDR1 levels conferred resistance to fluconazole only, as demonstrated by the susceptibility of isolates from patient 9. None of the changes observed in these isolates resulted in increased resistance to amphotericin B, which has been associated with changes in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway (33).
Finally, fluconazole resistance may affect virulence, as has been demonstrated using some of the isolates described in the present study in a murine model of systemic candidiasis (6). However, the correlation between increased resistance and decreased virulence was not always observed and may be dependent on the underlying mechanism of resistance, thus indicating a more complex relationship between antifungal susceptibility and clinical outcome.
Overall, the present study indicates a high degree of complexity in the molecular mechanisms responsible for fluconazole resistance, with five different patterns of resistance observed in five different series of isolates with decreasing susceptibilities to this antifungal drug. Additional studies are needed to fully understand how specific mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance are induced and to determine the impact of clinical management on the development of resistance to antifungal agents.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by a grant from Pfizer Inc., and by Public Health Service grants 1 R01 DE11381 (to T.F.P.), 1 R29 AI42401 (to J.L.L.-R.), and M01-RR-01346 for the Frederic C. Bartter General Clinical Research Center.
Chromogenic media were provided by the CHROMagar Company. We thank the Fungus Testing Laboratory at UTHSCSA for performing antifungal susceptibility testing.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78284-7881. Phone: (210) 567-1981. Fax: (210) 567-3303. E-mail: ribot{at}uthscsa.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Albertson, G. D., M. Niimi, R. D. Cannon, and H. F. Jenkinson. 1996. Multiple efflux mechanisms are involved in Candida albicans fluconazole resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2835-2841[Abstract]. |
| 2. |
Balan, I.,
A.-M. Alarco, and M. Raymond.
1997.
The Candida albicans CDR3 gene codes for an opaque-phase ABC transporter.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7210-7218 |
| 3. | Balzi, E., and A. Goffeau. 1994. Genetics and biochemistry of yeast multidrug resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1187:152-162[Medline]. |
| 4. | Calvet, H. M., M. R. Yeaman, and S. G. Filler. 1997. Reversible fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans: a potential in vitro model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:535-539[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Fling, M. E., J. Kopf, A. Tamrkin, J. A. Gorman, H. A. Smith, and Y. Koltin. 1991. Analysis of a Candida albicans gene that encodes a novel mechanism for resistance to benomyl and methotrexate. Mol. Gen. Genet. 227:318-329[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Graybill, J. R.,
E. Montalbo,
W. R. Kirkpatrick,
M. F. Luther,
S. G. Revankar, and T. F. Patterson.
1998.
Fluconazole versus Candida albicans: a complex relationship.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:682-697 |
| 7. | Higgins, C. F. 1992. ABC transporters: from microorganisms to man. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8:67-113. |
| 8. | Kirsch, D. R., M. H. Lai, and J. O'Sullivan. 1988. Isolation of the gene for cytochrome P450L1A1 (lanosterol 14 alpha-demethylase) from Candida albicans. Gene 68:229-237[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Lai, M. H., and D. R. Kirsch.
1989.
Nucleotide sequence of cytochrome P450L1A1 (lanosterol 14 alpha-demethylase) from Candida albicans.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:804 |
| 10. |
Lamb, D. C.,
D. E. Kelly,
W.-H. Schunck,
A. Z. Shyadehi,
M. Akhtar,
D. J. Lowe,
B. D. Baldwin, and S. L. Kelly.
1997.
The mutation T315A in Candida albicans sterol 14 -demethylase causes reduced enzyme activity and fluconazole-resistance through reduced affinity.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:5682-5688 |
| 11. | Löffler, J., S. L. Kelly, H. Hebart, U. Schumacher, C. Lass-Flörl, and H. Einsele. 1997. Molecular analysis of cyp51 from fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 151:263-268[Medline]. |
| 12. | Marger, M. D., and M. H. Sair. 1993. A major superfamily of transmembrane facilitators that catalyse uniport, symport, and antiport. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18:13-20[Medline]. |
| 13. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 14. | Patterson, T. F., W. R. Kirkpatrick, S. G. Revankar, R. K. McAtee, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1996. Comparative evaluation of macrodilution and chromogenic agar screening for determining fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:3237-3239[Abstract]. |
| 15. | Patterson, T. F., S. G. Revankar, W. R. Kirkpatrick, O. Dib, A. W. Fothergill, S. W. Redding, D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1996. Simple method for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts with chromogenic agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1794-1797[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Prasad, R., P. De Wergifosse, A. Goffeau, and E. Balzi. 1995. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene of Candida albicans, CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr. Genet. 27:320-329[Medline]. |
| 17. | Revankar, S. G., W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. K. McAtee, O. P. Dib, A. W. Fothergill, S. W. Redding, D. A. McGough, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 1996. Detection and significance of fluconazole resistance in oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. J. Infect. Dis. 174:821-827[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Revankar, S. G.,
W. R. Kirkpatrick,
R. K. McAtee,
A. W. Fothergill,
S. W. Redding,
M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson.
1998.
Interpretation of trailing endpoints in antifungal susceptibility testing by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methods.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:153-156 |
| 19. | Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Lancaster, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, T. J. Walsh, and A. L. Berry. 1997. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and Candida infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:235-247[Medline]. |
| 20. | Rex, J. H., M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller. 1995. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1-8[Medline]. |
| 21. | Sambrook, J. F., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 22. |
Sanglard, D.,
F. Ischer,
L. Koymans, and J. Bille.
1998.
Amino acid substitutions in the cytochrome P-450 lanosterol 14 -demethylase (CYP51A1) from azole-resistant Candida albicans clinical isolates contribute to resistance to azole antifungal agents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:241-253 |
| 23. | Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1996. Susceptibilities of Candida albicans multidrug transporter mutants to various antifungal agents and other metabolic inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2300-2305[Abstract]. |
| 24. |
Sanglard, D.,
F. Ischer,
M. Monod, and J. Bille.
1997.
Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene.
Microbiology
143:405-416 |
| 25. | Sanglard, D., K. Kuchler, F. Ischer, J.-L. Pagani, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1995. Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2378-2386[Abstract]. |
| 26. |
Schmid, J.,
E. Voss, and D. R. Soll.
1990.
Computer-assisted methods for assessing strain relatedness in Candida albicans by fingerprinting with the moderately repetitive sequence Ca3.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:1236-1243 |
| 27. | Vanden Bossche, H., P. Marichal, and F. C. Odds. 1994. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi. Trends Microbiol. 2:393-400[Medline]. |
| 28. |
Vanden Bossche, H.,
P. Marichal,
J. Gorrens,
D. Bellens,
H. Moereels, and P. A. J. Janssen.
1990.
Mutation in cytochrome P450-dependent 14 demethylase results in decreased affinity for azole antifungals.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
18:56-59[Medline].
|
| 29. | Venkateswarlu, K. D., W. Denning, N. J. Manning, and S. L. Kelly. 1995. Resistance to fluconazole in Candida albicans from AIDS patients correlated with reduced intracellular accumulation of drug. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 131:337-341[Medline]. |
| 30. | Walsh, T. J., M. Kasai, A. Francesconi, D. Landsman, and J. Chanock. 1997. New evidence that Candida albicans possesses additional ATP-binding cassette MDR-like genes: implications for antifungal azole resistance. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 35:133-137[Medline]. |
| 31. | White, T. C. 1997. Increased mRNA levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1482-1487[Abstract]. |
| 32. |
White, T. C.
1997.
The presence of an R467K amino acid substitution and loss of allelic variation correlate with an azole-resistant lanosterol 14 demethylase in Candida albicans.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1488-1494[Abstract].
|
| 33. |
White, T. C.,
R. A. Bowden, and K. A. Marr.
1998.
Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
11:382-402 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»