This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piddock, L. J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piddock, L. J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1998, p. 2956-2960, Vol. 42, No. 11
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Activities of New Fluoroquinolones against Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Pathogens of the Lower Respiratory Tract

Laura J. V. Piddock,1,* M. Johnson,2 V. Ricci,1 and S. L. Hill2

Antimicrobial Agents Research Group, Department of Infection,1 and Respiratory Research Laboratory,2 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Received 9 April 1998/Returned for modification 8 July 1998/Accepted 25 August 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The activities of six new fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, grepafloxacin, gatifloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, and levofloxacin) compared with those of sparfloxacin and ciprofloxacin with or without reserpine (20 µg/ml) were determined for 19 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, 5 Haemophilus sp. isolates, and 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin from patients with clinically confirmed lower respiratory tract infections. Based upon the MICs at which 50% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50s) and MIC90s, the most active agent was clinafloxacin, followed by (in order of decreasing activity) trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, sparfloxacin, and grepafloxacin. Except for clinafloxacin (and gatifloxacin and trovafloxacin for H. influenzae), none of the new agents had improved activities compared with that of ciprofloxacin for P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae. A variable reserpine effect was observed for ciprofloxacin and S. pneumoniae; however, for 9 of 19 (47%) isolates the MIC of ciprofloxacin was decreased by at least fourfold, suggesting the presence of an efflux pump contributing to the resistance phenotype. The laboratory parC (Ser79) mutant strain of S. pneumoniae required eightfold more ciprofloxacin for inhibition than the wild-type strain, but there was no change in the MIC of sparfloxacin and only a 1-dilution increase in the MICs of the other agents. For efflux pump mutant S. pneumoniae the activities of all the newer agents, except for levofloxacin, were reduced. Except for clinafloxacin, all second-step laboratory mutants required at least 2 µg of all fluoroquinolones per ml for inhibition.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Infections of the lower respiratory tract continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with underlying lung disease (24). Increasingly, fluoroquinolones are seen as drugs of choice for such infections, and there has been rapid development of new agents with improved in vitro activities against gram-positive bacteria, including pneumococci, compared to older agents such as ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin (CI-960, AM-1091, PD127391), gatifloxacin (AM-1155), grepafloxacin (OPC 17116), moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039), and trovafloxacin (CP 99,219) all have excellent in vitro activities for pathogens that cause community-acquired respiratory tract infections, including activity for Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to erythromycin and beta -lactams (5, 8, 9, 11-13, 16, 17, 27, 29, 35, 37, 38, 41).

The pharmacokinetic properties of many of these new agents, in particular the concentration of fluoroquinolones within the bronchial mucosa, suggest that once-daily dosing will be sufficient to allow concentrations of the agent to be in excess of the MICs for the majority of pathogens causing respiratory tract infection (Table 1). Although some new fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin (HR355) (L-ofloxacin), have in vitro activities similar to those of older agents, it has been proposed that their pharmacokinetic properties give rise to greater concentration within the bronchial mucosa such that these agents would be effective in the treatment of respiratory tract infections (2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Pharmacokinetic properties of fluoroquinolonesa

Clinical failure of older fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin has already been reported for pneumococci (4, 5, 19, 22), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20, 25, 34, 42), and Haemophilus influenzae (14). In addition, there have also been several reports of the selection and characterization of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae (15, 18, 23, 28, 30, 31, 36, 43).

It is likely that the population of respiratory tract pathogens that these new fluoroquinolones will encounter will include those already exposed, and possibly resistant, to older agents such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Therefore, in this investigation we sought to compare the activities of six new fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin) with those of sparfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the presence and absence of the gram-positive bacterial efflux inhibitor reserpine. In vitro susceptibilities to new antibiotics are typically determined with a wide range of clinical isolates from culture collections; many of these isolates are historical and were isolated prior to the widespread clinical use of fluoroquinolones and so do not reflect the current bacterial population infecting community and hospital patients. The isolates in the present study were from patients with clinically confirmed lower respiratory tract infection within the last two years.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacteria and growth conditions. From our culture collection 19 S. pneumoniae isolates, 3 H. influenzae isolates, six Haemophilus parainfluenzae isolates, and 10 P. aeruginosa isolates with decreased susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin (cutoff for Haemophilus spp., >= 0.03 µg/ml; cutoff for S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, >= 0.5 µg/ml) from patients with clinically confirmed lower respiratory tract infections were selected. Five clinical isolates of ciprofloxacin-resistant H. influenzae were also obtained from two other hospitals, in Aberdeen (22) and London (33), United Kingdom. Control strains were S. pneumoniae M3 (NCTC 7466; capsulated) and M4 (NCTC 7465; no capsule), H. influenzae N4 (NCTC 8466), and P. aeruginosa G1 (NCTC 10662). Mutants of M3 and M4 were selected and characterized in a parallel study (Table 2) (32). The mutant pneumococci were stably resistant without antibiotic pressure and were selected, after a single exposure to fluoroquinolone, with mutation frequencies suggestive of a mutation in a single gene. The quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE of each mutant was analyzed by PCR and DNA sequencing. The concentration of ciprofloxacin with or without reserpine accumulated was also determined for each mutant. Second-step mutants were obtained by exposing the first-step mutant to fluoroquinolone. All mutants and clinical isolates were maintained at -70°C on Protect beads without antibiotic and grown overnight in in brain heart infusion broth supplemented with NAD (10 µg/ml; Sigma) and hemin (10 µg/ml) for the Haemophilus spp. and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. The solid medium was Isosensitest agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Susceptibilities of selected S. pneumoniae mutants to fluoroquinolonesa

Antibiotics, and susceptibility determination. The MIC of each antibiotic for each strain was determined by the agar doubling-dilution method. All of the following antibiotics were gifts and were made up and used according to the manufacturers' instructions: ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin (Bayer AG) sparfloxacin (Rhone DPC Europe, Paris, France), grepafloxacin (Glaxo Wellcome), gatifloxacin (Gruenthal GmbH) trovafloxacin (Pfizer, New York, N.Y.), clinafloxacin (Parke-Davis Warner Lambert, Ann Arbor, Mich.), and levofloxacin (Hoechst Marion Roussel). Plates containing doubling dilutions of antibiotic were inoculated by transferring 1 µl of the undiluted overnight culture to the surface of the agar with a multipoint inoculator (DenleyTech, Billingshurst, United Kingdom) to give a final inoculum size of 106 CFU. All plates were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C overnight. The MIC of the antibiotic was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic (in micrograms per milliliter of agar) at which no more than 10 colonies were detected; a slight haze of growth was ignored. Reserpine (Sigma) was added to ciprofloxacin to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml. For the laboratory mutants, decimal dilutions of ciprofloxacin were used as previously described (31), to reflect the small but reproducible differences in susceptibility. All determinations were performed for all strains and agents in parallel on at least three separate occasions, until three identical values for each strain and agent were obtained. This allowed discrimination between MICs of different agents to within 1 dilution, typically the normal error of MIC determination experiments.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Activities for characterized mutant S. pneumoniae. Table 2 shows the susceptibilities of selected laboratory mutants. S. pneumoniae M26 had a mutation in parC, and this conferred an eightfold increase in the MIC of ciprofloxacin and a fourfold increase in the MIC of levofloxacin but no change in the MIC of sparfloxacin and only a 1-dilution increase in the MICs of the other agents tested.

Reserpine had no effect upon the MIC of ciprofloxacin for the wild-type quinolone-susceptible S. pneumoniae M3 and M4, and for the parC mutant of M3 (M26), the MIC of ciprofloxacin was only slightly reduced when reserpine was added. All mutants of M4 were efflux mutants (cross-resistant to unrelated agents such as erythromycin and ethidium bromide) and accumulated lower concentrations of ciprofloxacin than did M26 and M3 (wild-type concentrations were accumulated in the presence of reserpine [32]); consequently, the MIC of ciprofloxacin was reduced by reserpine. Except for levofloxacin, the activities of all the newer agents were reduced for these mutants, with a two- to fourfold decrease in activity for the most ciprofloxacin-resistant mutant (M22). However, clinafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin were least affected.

All second-step mutants derived from the parC mutant M26 were also efflux mutants but varied in susceptibility to reserpine, suggesting variations in expression of the efflux gene(s). Clinafloxacin was most active against the second-step mutants and retained good activity. For the remainder of the agents, all second-step mutants required at least a 2-µg/ml concentration of all newer fluoroquinolones for inhibition. The differences in the MICs of each agent were only 1 to 2 doubling dilutions, with the order of activity (from greatest to least) being clinafloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and grepafloxacin.

Activities for clinical isolates from the respiratory tract with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Table 3 shows the susceptibilities of the clinical isolates. All new agents, except for levofloxacin, had improved activities for all S. pneumoniae isolates compared with those of ciprofloxacin. The most active agent was clinafloxacin, followed by (in order of decreasing activity) trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, sparfloxacin, and grepafloxacin. Three of the 19 clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae required 32 µg of ciprofloxacin per ml for inhibition and showed phenotypes resembling those of the second-step mutants, suggesting that these strains possessed mutations in more than one gene.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Susceptibility (µg/ml) of clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus spp., and P. aeruginosa

Except for clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, and trovafloxacin, none of the new agents had improved activities compared with that of ciprofloxacin for the H. influenzae isolates.

For the P. aeruginosa isolates, except for clinafloxacin none of the new agents had improved activities compared with that of ciprofloxacin. The order of activity (from greatest to least) was levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, grepafloxacin, and moxifloxacin.

Affect of putative efflux pump on activity of clinical isolates of ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae. A variable reserpine effect was observed for ciprofloxacin and the clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae: for 1 of 19 clinical isolates reserpine had no effect, for 9 of 19 clinical isolates there was a 1-dilution difference (twofold decrease in the MIC), for 6 of 19 clinical isolates there was a 2-dilution difference (fourfold decrease in the MIC), and for 3 of 19 clinical isolates there was a 3-dilution difference (eightfold decrease in the MIC). It is of interest that the three clinical isolates for which the MIC of ciprofloxacin was most affected by reserpine were not the most resistant to ciprofloxacin (data not shown), and there was no clear correlation between the MIC of any agent and the effect of reserpine. However, for the most-resistant clinical isolates, reserpine reduced the MIC of ciprofloxacin from 32 to 4 to 8 µg/ml.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Clinical failures have occurred when ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin has been used to treat pneumococcal respiratory tract infections (4, 19, 21), and so the purpose of the present study was to determine whether such resistant clinical isolates would be susceptible to the newer fluoroquinolones. These new agents have been shown in vitro to be so active against quinolone-susceptible S. pneumoniae that it has been suggested that older agents no longer be used (1). In addition, with the new fluoroquinolones it is far more difficult to select resistant strains from wild-type quinolone-susceptible bacteria than from ciprofloxacin- or ofloxacin-resistant bacteria (32). Therefore, it is possible that replacing older agents with newer agents will slow down the selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants in the clinical setting and retain a predominantly sensitive, antibiotic-treatable population.

In many respects the clinical isolates described in the present study are the worst of the worst and present a challenge to any new fluoroquinolone. It should also be noted that such isolates are rare in our hospital unit; indeed, from the ~350 patients seen by physicians in specialist respiratory clinics per year (yielding approximately 1,500 specimens per year) about 90 S. pneumoniae isolates are obtained. Only 19 fluoroquinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates (MIC of ciprofloxacin > 0.5 µg/ml) have been obtained since 1990, and for only two patients was treatment seriously affected.

In the present study, for comparison with the clinical isolates, mutant S. pneumoniae strains were also investigated, having been characterized in a parallel study (32). The first-step mutant strains had MICs greater than the typical serum and bronchial levels of ciprofloxacin attained in humans (Table 1). While the mutant strains were also less susceptible to newer fluoroquinolones, the increases in the MICs were small. It has been proposed that topoisomerase IV of S. pneumoniae is the primary target of fluoroquinolones; however, it is clear that the parC mutation of S. pneumoniae (M26) confers very little resistance to sparfloxacin, clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin. These data suggest that these agents have similar activities for topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase, so only a mutation in both genes would confer high-level resistance, whereas ciprofloxacin has preferential activity for topoisomerase IV and a lesser affinity for DNA gyrase, such that mutation in parC is sufficient to render a strain resistant. The second-step mutants were highly resistant to ciprofloxacin, and the decrease in susceptibility conferred to the other fluoroquinolones would probably define these mutants as clinically resistant to all of them except clinafloxacin.

Reserpine is an inhibitor of several gram-positive bacterial efflux pumps, including the putative efflux pump of S. pneumoniae, and in the presence of reserpine the MICs of norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin were decreased (3, 6). Efflux of fluoroquinolones by S. pneumoniae has been demonstrated by Zeller et al. (43), although the precise identification of the gene(s) and protein(s) involved has yet to be described. Brenwald et al. (7) showed that of 273 clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae with MICs of ciprofloxacin of >1 µg/ml, in the presence of 10-µg/ml reserpine 124 isolates had an increase in susceptibility to norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin of fourfold or more.

In the present study 20-µg/ml reserpine was used for comparison with data from accumulation experiments by this laboratory and others. A variable reserpine effect was observed for ciprofloxacin and the clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae; however, for 47% of the isolates the MIC of ciprofloxacin was decreased by at least fourfold, suggesting the presence of an efflux pump contributing to the resistance phenotype. However, there was no clear correlation between the MIC of any agent and the reserpine effect. It is probable that several efflux pumps exist in S. pneumoniae, and experiments with genetically defined mutants are required to determine precisely which fluoroquinolones are most affected.

If the recommended breakpoint concentrations for these newer fluoroquinolones are set at concentrations similar to those for other quinolones, at 1 to 8 µg/ml, then only clinafloxacin would be defined as clinically active against all the mutants and clinical isolates described in this study. However, at 1 µg/ml all of the new fluoroquinolones inhibited at least 50% of the clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. Some of the ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates would also be resistant to some of the new agents, but based purely upon in vitro data the most likely to be affected are grepafloxacin and levofloxacin. With the active search for fluoroquinolones with improved activities against gram-positive bacteria, especially S. pneumoniae, there has been some loss of activity for gram-negative bacteria, and this is clearly shown for the ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, for which all of the agents investigated in this study had poor activity. Two of the H. influenzae isolates studied would be considered to be clinically resistant to all of the fluoroquinolones studied.

It may well be that the recommended breakpoint concentrations for these new agents are higher than 4 µg/ml, especially as the calculation of these values in some countries, such as the United Kingdom, takes into account the pharmacokinetic properties of an antibiotic. All the new agents had substantially improved pharmacokinetics and concentrated to greater levels in the lungs compared with ciprofloxacin (Table 1). For those agents that accumulate to high concentrations and can be given in doses higher than 800 mg/day, the activity for ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae may well be improved.

It is clear that the clinical judgement as to which new fluoroquinolone to use in the treatment of respiratory tract infections will be based upon several factors, including the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria, pharmacokinetics (frequency of dosing and concentration within the lungs), toxicity, adverse reactions, and patient type. In general, the newer fluoroquinolones had enhanced activity for ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae, but for the ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae isolates with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin there was little improvement. Therefore, it is important to establish the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection and/or the patient population treated before using empiric fluoroquinolone treatment. For patients in the community, this information may not be readily available, and so knowledge of the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the community would be useful before treatment.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported in part by Bayer AG, Glaxo Wellcome, and Hoechst Marion Roussel.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Antimicrobial Agents Research Group, Department of Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-21-414-6969. Fax: 44-21-414-6966. E-mail: l.j.v.piddock{at}bham.ac.uk.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Acar, J. F., and F. W. Goldstein. 1997. Trends in bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:S67-S73.
2. Andrews, J. M., D. Honeybourne, G. Jevons, N. P. Brenwald, B. Cunningham, and R. Wise. 1997. Concentrations of levofloxacin (HR 355) in the respiratory tract following a single oral dose in patients undergoing fibre-optic bronchoscopy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:573-577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Baranova, N. N., and A. A. Neyfakh. 1997. Apparent involvement of a multidrug transporter in the fluoroquinolone resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41:1396-1398[Abstract].
4. Bernard, L., J.-C. Ngyen Van, and J. L. Mainardi. 1995. In vivo selection of Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to quinolones including sparfloxacin. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 1:60-61. [Medline]
5. Bauernfeind, A. 1997. Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:639-651[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Brenwald, N. P., M. J. Gill, and R. Wise. 1997. The effect of reserpine, an inhibitor of multi-drug efflux pumps, on the in vitro susceptibilities of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to norfloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:458-460[Free Full Text].
7. Brenwald, N. P., M. J. Gill, and R. Wise. 1998. Prevalence of a putative efflux mechanism among fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2032-2035[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Brueggemann, A. B., K. C. Kugler, and G. V. Doern. 1997. In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a novel 8-methoxyquinolone, compared to activities of six fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1594-1597[Abstract].
9. Cohen, M. A., M. D. Huband, J. W. Gage, S. L. Yoder, G. E. Roland, and S. J. Gracheck. 1997. In-vitro activity of clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:205-211[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Cook, P. J., J. M. Andrews, R. Wise, D. Honeybourne, and H. Mougdil. 1995. Concentrations of OPC-17116, a new fluoroquinolone antibacterial, in serum and lung compartments. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:317-326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Dalhoff, A., U. Petersen, and R. Endermann. 1996. In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone. Chemotherapy 42:410-425[Medline].
12. Fas, R. J. 1997. In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1818-1824[Abstract].
13. Fuchs, P. C., A. J. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 1997. Susceptibility of multi-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and levofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:671-672[Free Full Text].
14. Georgiou, M., R. Munoz, F. Roman, R. Canton, R. Gomezlus, J. Campos, and A. G. Delacampa. 1996. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae strains possess mutations in analogous positions of gyrA and parC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1741-1744[Abstract].
15. Goldsmith, C. E., J. E. Moore, P. G. Murphy, and J. E. Ambler. 1998. Increased incidence of ciprofloxacin resistance in penicillin-resistant pneumococci in Northern Ireland. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41:420-421[Free Full Text].
16. HoogkampKorstanje, J. A. A. 1997. In-vitro activities of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin against Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens from the respiratory tract. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:427-431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Imada, T., S. Miyazaki, M. Nishida, K. Yamaguchi, and S. Goto. 1992. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of a new quinolone, OPC-17116. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:573-579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Janoir, C., V. Zeller, M. D. Kitzis, N. J. Moreau, and L. Gutmann. 1996. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae requires mutations in parC and gyrA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2760-2764[Abstract].
19. Korner, R. J., D. S. Reeves, and A. P. MacGowen. 1994. Dangers of oral fluoroquinolone treatment in community acquired upper respiratory tract infections. Br. Med. J. 308:191-192[Free Full Text].
20. Kureishi, A., J. M. Diver, B. Beckthold, T. Schollaardt, and L. E. Bryan. 1994. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNA gyrase gyrA gene from strain PAO1 and quinolone-resistant clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1944-1952[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Lee, B. L., A. M. Padula, R. C. Kimbrough, S. R. Jones, R. E. Chaisson, J. Mills, and M. A. Sandy. 1991. Infection complications with respiratory pathogens despite ciprofloxacin therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:520[Medline].
22. Gould, I. M., K. J. Forbes, and G. S. Gordon. 1994. Quinolone resistant Haemophilus influenzae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 33:187-188[Free Full Text].
23. Muñoz, R., and A. G. De La Campa. 1996. ParC subunit of DNA topoisomerase IV of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a primary target of fluoroquinolones and cooperates with DNA gyrase A subunit in forming resistance phenotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2252-2257[Abstract].
24. Murray, C. J. L., and A. D. Lopez. 1996. Evidence-based health policy---lessons from the global burden of disease study. Science 5288:740.
25. Nakano, M., T. Deguchi, T. Kawamura, M. Yasuda, M. Kimura, Y. Okano, and Y. Kawada. 1997. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2289-2291[Abstract].
26. Nakashima, M., T. Uematsu, K. Kosuge, H. Kusajima, T. Ooie, Y. Masuda, R. Ishida, and H. Uchida. 1995. Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of AM-1155, a new 6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone, in humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2635-2640[Abstract].
27. Neal, T. J., M. A. O'Donaghue, E. J. Ridgway, and K. D. Allen. 1992. In vitro activity of ten antimicrobial agents against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30:39-46[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28. Pan, X.-S., and L. M. Fisher. 1996. Cloning and characterization of the parC and parE genes of Streptococcus pneumoniae encoding DNA topoisomerase IV: role in fluoroquinolone resistance. J. Bacteriol. 178:4060-4069[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1995. Activity of CP99,219 compared with DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:230-232[Free Full Text].
30. Piddock, L. J. V., and Y. F. Jin. 1992. Selection of quinolone-resistant mutants of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30:109-110[Free Full Text].
31. Piddock, L. J. V., Y.-F. Jin, and M. J. Everett. 1997. Non-gyrA mediated ciprofloxacin resistance in laboratory mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:609-615[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Piddock, L. J. V., Y. F. Jin, and V. Ricci. Characterisation of mutant Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibility to moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Unpublished data.
33. Prentice, M. 1997. Unpublished data.
34. Pumbwe, L., M. J. Everett, R. E. W. Hancock, and L. J. V. Piddock. 1996. Role of gyrA mutation and loss of OprF in the multiple antibiotic-resistance phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa G49. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 143:25-28[Medline].
35. Swenson, J., J. H. Jorgensen, M. J. Ferraro, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Activity of newer fluoroquinolones against recent clinical isolates of ofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, abstr. E-62, p. 124. In Proceedings of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
36. Tankovic, J., B. Perichon, J. Duval, and P. Courvalin. 1997. Contribution of mutations in gyrA and parC genes to fluoroquinolone resistance of mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae obtained in vivo and in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2505-2510[Abstract].
37. Thomson, K. S., S. A. Chartrand, C. C. Sanders, and S. L. Block. 1997. Trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:478-480[Abstract].
38. Wakabayashi, E., and S. Mitsuhashi. 1994. In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-1155, a novel 6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:594-601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Wise, R. 1991. Comparative penetration of selected fluoroquinolones into respiratory tract fluids and tissues. Am. J. Med. 91:675-705.
40. Wise, R., and D. Honeybourne. 1996. A review of the penetration of sparfloxacin into the lower respiratory tract and sinuses. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37(Suppl. A):57-63.
41. Woodcock, J. M., J. M. Andrews, F. J. Boswell, N. P. Brenwald, and R. Wise. 1997. In vitro activity of moxifloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:101-106[Abstract].
42. Yonezawa, M., M. Takahata, N. Matsubara, Y. Watanabe, and H Narita. 1995. DNA gyrase gyrA mutations in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1970-1972[Abstract].
43. Zeller, V., C. Janoir, M.-D. Kitzis, L. Gutmann, and N. J. Moreau. 1997. Active efflux as a mechanism of resistance to ciprofloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1973-1978[Abstract].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1998, p. 2956-2960, Vol. 42, No. 11
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Garvey, M. I., Piddock, L. J. V. (2008). The Efflux Pump Inhibitor Reserpine Selects Multidrug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains That Overexpress the ABC Transporters PatA and PatB. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1677-1685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shin, J. H., Jung, H. J., Kim, H. R., Jeong, J., Jeong, S. H., Kim, S., Lee, E. Y., Lee, J. N., Chang, C. L. (2007). Prevalence, Characteristics, and Molecular Epidemiology of Macrolide and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae at Five Tertiary-Care Hospitals in Korea. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 2625-2627 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Piddock, L. J. V. (2006). Clinically Relevant Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 382-402 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Marrer, E., Schad, K., Satoh, A. T., Page, M. G. P., Johnson, M. M., Piddock, L. J. V. (2006). Involvement of the Putative ATP-Dependent Efflux Proteins PatA and PatB in Fluoroquinolone Resistance of a Multidrug-Resistant Mutant of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 685-693 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Marrer, E., Satoh, A. T., Johnson, M. M., Piddock, L. J. V., Page, M. G. P. (2006). Global Transcriptome Analysis of the Responses of a Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Mutant and Its Parent to Ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 269-278 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Azoulay-Dupuis, E., Bedos, J. P., Mohler, J., Moine, P., Cherbuliez, C., Peytavin, G., Fantin, B., Kohler, T. (2005). Activity of Gemifloxacin against Quinolone-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains In Vitro and in a Mouse Pneumonia Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1046-1054 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yoo, B. K, Triller, D. M, Yong, C.-S., Lodise, T. P (2004). Gemifloxacin: A New Fluoroquinolone Approved for Treatment of Respiratory Infections. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 1226-1235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, M., Sahm, D. F., Jacoby, G. A., Zhang, Y., Hooper, D. C. (2004). Activities of Newer Quinolones against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Containing the Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Determinant qnr. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 1400-1401 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Azoulay-Dupuis, E., Bedos, J. P., Mohler, J., Peytavin, G., Isturiz, R., Moine, P., Rieux, V., Cherbuliez, C., Pechere, J. C., Fantin, B., Kohler, T. (2004). Activities of Garenoxacin against Quinolone-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains In Vitro and in a Mouse Pneumonia Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 765-773 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gibson, R. L., Burns, J. L., Ramsey, B. W. (2003). Pathophysiology and Management of Pulmonary Infections in Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 168: 918-951 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Van Bambeke, F., Glupczynski, Y., Plesiat, P., Pechere, J. C., Tulkens, P. M. (2003). Antibiotic efflux pumps in prokaryotic cells: occurrence, impact on resistance and strategies for the future of antimicrobial therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1055-1065 [Full Text]  
  • Valdezate, S., Vindel, A., Echeita, A., Baquero, F., Canto, R. (2002). Topoisomerase II and IV Quinolone Resistance-Determining Regions in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates with Different Levels of Quinolone Susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 665-671 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Piddock, L. J. V., Johnson, M. M., Simjee, S., Pumbwe, L. (2002). Expression of Efflux Pump Gene pmrA in Fluoroquinolone-Resistant and -Susceptible Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 808-812 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Piddock, L. J. V., Johnson, M. M. (2002). Accumulation of 10 Fluoroquinolones by Wild-Type or Efflux Mutant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 813-820 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Morris, J. E., Pan, X.-S., Fisher, L. M. (2002). Grepafloxacin, a Dimethyl Derivative of Ciprofloxacin, Acts Preferentially through Gyrase in Streptococcus pneumoniae: Role of the C-5 Group in Target Specificity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 582-585 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ince, D., Hooper, D. C. (2001). Mechanisms and Frequency of Resistance to Gatifloxacin in Comparison to AM-1121 and Ciprofloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2755-2764 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nagai, K., Davies, T. A., Dewasse, B. E., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C. (2001). Single- and multi-step resistance selection study of gemifloxacin compared with trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 365-374 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Oteo, J., Alos, J. I., Gomez-Garces, J. L. (2001). Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in 1999 and 2000 in Madrid, Spain: a multicentre surveillance study. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 215-218 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lynch, J. P. III (2001). Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia : Risk Factors, Microbiology, and Treatment. Chest 119 : 373S-384S [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cubbon, M. D., Masterton, R. G. (2000). New quinolones--a fresh answer to the pneumococcus. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 869-872 [Full Text]  
  • Wright, D. H., Brown, G. H., Peterson, M. L., Rotschafer, J. C. (2000). Application of fluoroquinolone pharmacodynamics. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 669-683 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bast, D. J., Low, D. E., Duncan, C. L., Kilburn, L., Mandell, L. A., Davidson, R. J., de Azavedo, J. C. S. (2000). Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Contributions of Type II Topoisomerase Mutations and Efflux to Levels of Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 3049-3054 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nagai, K., Davies, T. A., Pankuch, G. A., Dewasse, B. E., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C. (2000). In Vitro Selection of Resistance to Clinafloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, and Trovafloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 2740-2746 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thomson, K. S. (2000). Minimizing quinolone resistance: are the new agents more or less likely to cause resistance?. J Antimicrob Chemother 45: 719-723 [Full Text]  
  • Pestova, E., Millichap, J. J., Noskin, G. A., Peterson, L. R. (2000). Intracellular targets of moxifloxacin: a comparison with other fluoroquinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother 45: 583-590 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hsueh, P.-R., Liu, Y.-C., Shyr, J.-M., Wu, T.-L., Yan, J.-J., Wu, J.-J., Leu, H.-S., Chuang, Y.-C., Yeu-Jen Lau, , Luh, K.-T. (2000). Multicenter Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in Taiwan during the 1998-1999 Respiratory Season. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 1342-1345 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moss, P. J, Finch, R. G (2000). The next generation: fluoroquinolones in the management of acute lower respiratory infection in adults. Thorax 55: 83-85 [Full Text]  
  • de Azavedo, J. C. S., Trpeski, L., Pong-Porter, S., Matsumura, S., The Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network, , Low, D. E. (1999). In Vitro Activities of Fluoroquinolones against Antibiotic-Resistant Blood Culture Isolates of Viridans Group Streptococci from across Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 2299-2301 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pestova, E., Beyer, R., Cianciotto, N. P., Noskin, G. A., Peterson, L. R. (1999). Contribution of Topoisomerase IV and DNA Gyrase Mutations in Streptococcus pneumoniae to Resistance to Novel Fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 2000-2004 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piddock, L. J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piddock, L. J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, S. L.