Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1998, p. 2996-2999, Vol. 42, No. 11
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Multicenter Phase I/II Dose Escalation Study of
Single-Dose Cidofovir Gel for Treatment of Recurrent Genital
Herpes
Stephen L.
Sacks,1,*
Stephen D.
Shafran,2
Francisco
Diaz-Mitoma,3
Sylvie
Trottier,4
R. Gary
Sibbald,5
April
Hughes,1
Sharon
Safrin,6
Jeff
Rudy,6
Brian
McGuire,6 and
Howard S.
Jaffe6
Viridae Clinical Sciences, Inc., and Department of
Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University
of British Columbia, Vancouver, British
Columbia,1
Division of Infectious
Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta,2
Children's Hospital of
Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario,3
Laboratoire et Service d'Infectiologie, Centre Hospitalier de
l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy,
Québec,4 and
DeBary
Dermatologicals, Mississauga, Ontario,5
Canada, and
Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City,
California6
Received 6 April 1998/Returned for modification 18 May
1998/Accepted 17 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
A randomized, double-blind, clinic-initiated, sequential
dose-escalation pilot study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of single applications of 1, 3, and 5% cidofovir gel with
placebo in the treatment of early, lesional, recurrent genital herpes
at five Canadian outpatient sites. Ninety-six patients began treatment
within 12 h of lesion appearance and were evaluated twice daily
until healing of the lesion occurred. Cidofovir gel at all strengths
significantly decreased the median time to negative virus culture in a
dose-dependent fashion (3.0 days in the placebo group versus 2.2, 1.3, and 1.1 days in the 1, 3, and 5% cidofovir gel treatment groups,
respectively; P = 0.02, 0.0001, and 0.0003, respectively). A trend toward a reduction in the median time to complete healing in association with treatment was present, but the
differences were not statistically significant (5.0 days in the
placebo group versus 4.3, 4.1, and 4.6 days in the 1, 3, and 5%
cidofovir gel treatment groups, respectively). Application site
reactions occurred in 3, 5, 19, and 22% of the patients in these four
groups, respectively. Treatment-associated lesion recrudescence with
delayed healing, which is suggestive of local toxicity, was observed in
three patients treated with 5% cidofovir gel and one patient treated
with 3% cidofovir gel. In summary, single-dose application of
cidofovir gel confers a significant antiviral effect on lesions of
recurrent genital herpes. Additional studies are warranted to further
identify the optimal efficacious dose of cidofovir in association with
the maximum gel strength that can be tolerated.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Genital herpes is a sexually
transmitted disease characterized by episodic genital lesions and
persistent latent infection (7). More than 30 million
persons in North America have genital herpes simplex virus (HSV)
infection, the incidence of which appears to be rising (3).
Although long-term suppressive antiviral therapy has become the
standard of care for those patients with frequent recurrences, chronic
therapy may not be practical for the majority of infected individuals
with recurrent infection who experience only mild symptoms or
infrequent recurrences. Currently, three oral antiviral agents,
acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir, have been shown to
confer significant effects on the cessation of virus shedding, lesion
healing, and symptomatic relief when used episodically early in the
course of recurrent genital infection (6, 8, 13). To date,
topical antiviral agents such as 5% acyclovir ointment (5),
foscarnet cream (9), edoxudine (10), and alpha
interferon gel (11) have not provided results comparable to
those provided by systemic agents. A topical treatment which
attenuates the severity and duration of recurrent episodes in a fashion
comparable to those by which systemic agents attenuate the
severity and duration of recurrent episodes would add significantly to
currently available therapies.
Cidofovir [(S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxy propyl) cytosine]
is an acyclic nucleotide analog that is phosphorylated in cells to the
active metabolite cidofovir diphosphate, and this is done independently
of viral thymidine kinase (12). Cidofovir has a broad
antiviral spectrum, including activity against HSV type 1 (HSV-1)
and HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus,
human herpesviruses 6 and 8, human papillomavirus, polyomavirus,
and poxviruses (12). An intravenous formulation (Vistide) is
approved for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in AIDS
patients on the basis of three controlled clinical trials (12). The prolonged intracellular half-lives of the active
metabolites (up to 65 h) permit systemic dosing at intervals of
every 1 to 2 weeks and suggest that the administration of single
topical doses might be effective for the treatment of cutaneous HSV infections.
In animal models of genital HSV infection, successful outcomes have
been observed in guinea pigs that have been inoculated with HSV-2 and
that have received single-dose therapy (1). Additionally,
cidofovir gel had significant antiviral and clinical efficacies
compared with those of a placebo in the treatment of acyclovir-resistant HSV infection in patients with AIDS (4). We report here the results of a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, dose-escalation pilot study designed to determine
whether antiviral and/or clinical benefits of single-dose cidofovir gel
could be achieved in immunocompetent patients treated early in the
course of lesional recurrent genital herpes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patient population.
Patients at five Canadian centers were
enrolled in the study between May 1995 and June 1996. All subjects were
older than 18 years, had a history of genital herpes previously
confirmed by culture or serology, and had recurrent anogenital herpes
lesions that were less than 12 h in duration and that had not
progressed beyond the ulcer stage. Subjects were in good general health
and were willing to abstain from sexual contact for the duration of the
study. All patients provided written, informed consent, as approved by
the ethical review board at each center. Excluded patients were those
who had received antiviral therapy in the preceding 2 weeks or
immunomodulator therapy within 30 days, had a history of
immunodeficiency or other conditions which could interfere with study
assessments, or were pregnant or breast-feeding.
Study design.
Eligible patients were stratified by gender
and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either
cidofovir gel or matching placebo. Sequential cohorts received 1, 3, or
5% cidofovir gel strengths. Active and placebo gels were supplied by
Gilead Sciences Inc. and were formulated in propylene glycol,
hydroxyethylcellulose, methylparaben, propylparaben, and disodium EDTA,
with the pH adjusted to 7.0. Samples of all visible genital lesions
were obtained for culture prior to treatment. Active or placebo gel was
administered by study personnel and was permitted to dry before
clothing was replaced. The gel was applied in a thin layer to cover all
visible lesions and extend beyond the edge of each by a margin of 5 mm.
New lesions appearing subsequent to day 1 were not treated, nor were
any original lesions retreated. Patients returned twice daily at 6- to
16-h intervals for lesion examination and virus culture until complete
healing (i.e., reepithelialization) had occurred. At each visit, the
following were collected: data on symptom(s) (itching, pain or burning,
tingling, and swab-associated tenderness), data on lesional stage
(edema or papule, vesicle or pustule, ulcer, soft crust, hard crust),
lesion swab for HSV culture, data on the incidence of new lesions
within the treatment area, and data on adverse events. The times at
which all observations were made were recorded. Lesion staging and
culture techniques were standardized across study sites by means of
investigator training, color illustrations, and photographs provided by
Viridae Clinical Sciences, Inc. Complete blood count, serum
chemistries, and urinalyses were performed on day 1 (predosing) and day 5.
Prior to dose escalation, adverse event data for the current group were
assessed in a blinded fashion. Advancement to the next dosing cohort
required that fewer than 30% of patients within a given stratum
experienced dose-limiting toxicity. No patient was reenrolled into
subsequent dosing cohorts.
Virology.
African green monkey kidney cells were provided by
Connaught Laboratories (North York, Ontario, Canada) or Viromed
Laboratories (Minneapolis, Minn.). HSV cultures were performed at each
local laboratory with standardized Dacron swabs, transport medium, and culture method. Lesions at the hard crust stage were not unroofed for swabbing.
Statistical methods.
The primary efficacy endpoint was time
to complete healing of all lesions. Secondary efficacy endpoints
included safety, time to conversion to HSV-negative culture, and
duration of lesion-associated symptoms.
Efficacy and safety analyses included all randomized patients and were
performed by an intent-to-treat method comparing treated
and placebo
patients. The study was not powered to detect statistical
differences
between treatment groups. Patients were censored in
time-to-event
analyses at the last follow-up without an event.
Only patients with a
positive culture within 24 h of enrollment
were analyzed for time
to HSV-negative culture, defined as the
time from randomization to
the time that the first negative culture
without a subsequent
positive
culture.
Time-to-event comparisons of the treatment groups (e.g., median time
to complete healing, median time to cessation of virus
shedding,
and median duration of symptoms) were performed by the
log-rank test
(SAS version 6.07; SAS, Cary, N.C.).
 |
RESULTS |
Patient characteristics and dispositions.
Ninety-six patients
(49 females and 47 males) with a median age of 35 years were randomized
into the study as follows: 20 patients to the 1% cidofovir gel, 21 to
the 3% cidofovir gel, 23 to the 5% cidofovir gel, and 32 to the
combined placebo groups (Table 1). The
four treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographics,
past herpes history, and baseline characteristics. Ninety-four
percent of patients were Caucasian. Over the preceding 6 months,
the subjects had a median number of three recurrences of HSV that
lasted a median of 6 days and at study entry had one to three lesions
with a median duration of 7 h prior to application of the study
drug. Eighty-one percent had at least one positive virus culture during
the study, of which all but one was HSV-2.
One patient was lost to follow-up after day 1, and three patients
were withdrawn from study observation because of treatment-related
ulceration (3% cidofovir, one patient; 5% cidofovir, two patients).
Overall, compliance with the twice-daily clinic visit schedule
was excellent: of 1,096 potential clinic visits, 1,012 (92%) were
completed. Seventy-six patients (79%) did not miss a
visit.
Lesion healing.
The median time to complete healing was
shorter across all cidofovir groups compared with that across all
placebo groups, reaching statistical significance only for women
receiving 3% cidofovir (P = 0.04; Table
2). Time to complete healing
appeared to be dose dependent, with a suggestion of faster
healing with 1 and 3% cidofovir compared with that with placebo.
Recrudescence of ulceration was observed in two men
receiving 5% cidofovir, leading to a lessened improvement in healing
time relative to those for subjects in the 1% and 3% cidofovir
groups. New lesions in the original treatment area appeared only in
patients receiving 3 or 5% cidofovir gel and appeared in a total
of six patients (one woman and five men). No patient in the
placebo or 1% cidofovir gel groups developed new lesions within the
original treatment area.
Virus shedding.
The median time to conversion to negative HSV
culture was 3.0 days for patients receiving placebo, whereas they
were 2.2, 1.3, and 1.1 days for patients receiving 1, 3, and 5%
cidofovir, respectively (P = 0.02, 0.0001, and 0.0003, respectively) (Table 2 and Fig. 1).
Lesion symptoms.
The median duration of all symptoms was 2.9 days for patients receiving placebo, whereas they were 2.3, 2.4, and
3.5 days for patients receiving 1, 3, and 5% gel, respectively
(P was not significant for all comparisons). In general, men
had longer median durations of symptoms (2.9 to 3.6 days) than women
(2.0 to 4.0 days).
Adverse events.
Fifty-five percent of all patients reported at
least one adverse event or intercurrent illness during the study
period. The most frequent systemic adverse events included headache
(11% of patients treated with cidofovir versus 13% of patients
treated with placebo), pharyngitis (11 versus 6%), and nausea (6 versus 6%). There were no laboratory findings suggestive of systemic toxicity in any patient during the study.
Application site reactions consisted of pain, pruritus, skin changes,
or ulceration and appeared to be dose dependent (Table
3). Application site reactions occurred
in one patient receiving
placebo (3%), one patient receiving 1%
cidofovir (5%), four patients
receiving 3% cidofovir (19%), and five
patients receiving 5% cidofovir
(22%).
The ability to distinguish local toxicity (e.g., ulceration) from the
natural course of genital herpes complicated the ability
to understand
drug-related effects. The demonstration of negative
virus cultures and
the delayed time to healing were suggestive
of local toxicity. For
example, a single ulcer observed in a man
receiving 3% cidofovir was
small and short-lived; it was originally
thought to represent a new
herpes lesion but was culture negative
for virus. Genital ulcers in
three men receiving 5% cidofovir
were larger, lasted for several
weeks, and were also culture negative
for virus. Each of these men
experienced a similar course, consisting
of initial healing of the
original herpes lesion(s), followed
by an apparent relapse (i.e.,
renewed ulceration, pruritus, and/or
erythema) of mild to moderate
severity 3 to 7 days later. Two
patients were empirically started on
oral acyclovir, and two patients
were also treated with topical
corticosteroids, without
benefit.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The pilot study described here demonstrates that a single topical
dose of cidofovir gel applied in a clinic within 12 h of the onset
of a recurrent genital herpes outbreak significantly decreases the time
to cessation of virus shedding in a dose-dependent manner compared with
that after application of a placebo. Additionally observed was a trend
toward faster healing of herpes lesions in cidofovir-treated
versus placebo-treated patients, although this did not reach
statistical significance. The relationship of application site
reactions following the use of different doses of the study drug
suggests that the optimal dose of cidofovir gel for this indication may
be 1%.
Previous studies of topical treatments for genital herpes have yielded
mixed results. Trials of topical acyclovir and foscarnet cream did not
show a clinical benefit compared with that from placebo (5,
9). A study of topical alpha interferon demonstrated both
antiviral and lesion healing effects, particularly in men (11); a 5-day application of topical edoxudine showed
significant antiviral effects without improvement of lesion healing
(10). Cidofovir gel had significant antiviral effects in
both men and women after a single application in the current study, and
within the limits of the small sample size, a trend toward improvement in clinical parameters was suggested as well. An efficacious, well-tolerated topical preparation requiring infrequent administration would represent a convenient site-directed alternative for patients.
A comparison of the antiviral effects of topical cidofovir with those
of oral antiviral agents for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes
is encouraging. In previous studies, the median times to cessation of
virus shedding were reduced from 3.3 days to 1.3 to 1.7 days by
twice-daily oral famciclovir treatment for 5 days (8) and
from 4.0 to 2.0 days following once-daily oral valacyclovir therapy for
5 days (13). In comparison, single-dose treatment with
cidofovir gel reduced the median time to cessation of virus shedding
from 3.0 days to 1.1 to 2.2 days. Potential differences in patient
populations as well as the noncontemporaneous nature of these studies
prevent a true comparison; additionally, a local effect of topical
agents may render virus cultures more difficult to perform during
clinical trials and, thus, makes a comparison with clinical trials of
systemic agents potentially misleading. However, the results of our
pilot study suggest that larger future trials with topical cidofovir
are warranted to further assess antiviral and clinical efficacies.
The unique single-dose format used in the trial described here is
different from the format with repeated doses of cidofovir gel used for
the treatment of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus
(4) or for the treatment of human papillomavirus infection in immunocompromised hosts (2). The lack of relapse of virus shedding following a single application of gel suggests that cellular uptake and the half-lives of cidofovir metabolites were adequate for
prolonged suppression of replication, thus providing further support
for the role of intracellular inhibition of viral DNA polymerase as the
key determinant of a clinical antiviral effect. It is not clear whether
lower strengths of cidofovir gel used more frequently would retain
efficacy while limiting local adverse events.
These findings support the further development of cidofovir gel as a
therapy for recurrent genital herpes in the immunocompetent host, and
they also highlight the need to identify a uniformly well-tolerated
dose that will achieve optimal antiviral and clinical effects.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported by a grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc.
We thank Denise Galipeau for assistance with the preparation of the
manuscript, Shiao-ping Lu and Henry Liu for statistical analyses, Bruce
Rennie for on-site teaching of virology methods, and the following
clinical research personnel: Chantal Bergeron, Pat Coutts, Louise
Gosselin, Rashieda Gluck, Lyne Lapointe, Lianne Martin, Sharon Roberts,
and Joseph J. Sasadeusz.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Viridae Clinical
Sciences, Inc., 1134 Burrard St., Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6Z 1Y8. Phone: (604) 689-9404. Fax: (604) 689-5153. E-mail:
sacks{at}viridae.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
De Clerq, E., and A. Holy.
1991.
Efficacy of (S)-2-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxy propyl)cytosine in various models of herpes simplex virus infection in mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:701-706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Douglas, J.,
L. Corey,
S. Tyring,
J. Kriesel,
B. Bowden,
D. Crosby,
T. Berger,
M. Conant,
B. McGuire, and H. S. Jaffe.
1997.
A phase I/II study of cidofovir topical gel for refractory condyloma acuminatum in patients with HIV infection, abstr. 334.
In
Program and abstracts of the 4th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.
|
| 3.
|
Fleming, D. T.,
G. M. McQuillan,
R. E. Johnson,
A. J. Nahmias,
S. O. Aral,
F. K. Lee, and M. E. St. Louis.
1997.
Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994.
N. Engl. J. Med.
337:1105-1111[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Lalezari, J.,
T. Schacker,
J. Feinberg,
J. Gathe,
S. Lee,
T. Cheung,
F. Kramer,
H. Kessler,
L. Corey,
W. L. Drew,
J. Boggs,
B. McGuire,
H. S. Jaffe, and S. Safrin.
1997.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cidofovir gel for the treatment of acyclovir-unresponsive mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in patients with AIDS.
J. Infect. Dis.
176:892-898[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Reichman, R.,
G. J. Badger,
M. E. Guinan,
A. J. Nahmias,
R. E. Keeney,
L. G. Davis,
T. Ashikaga, and R. Dolin.
1983.
Topically administered acyclovir in the treatment of recurrent herpes simplex genitalis: a controlled trial.
J. Infect. Dis.
147:336-340[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Reichman, R. C.,
G. J. Badger,
G. J. Mertz,
L. Corey,
D. D. Richman,
J. D. Connor,
D. Redfield,
M. C. Savoia,
M. N. Oxman, and Y. Bryson.
1984.
Treatment of recurrent genital herpes simplex infections with oral acyclovir.
JAMA
251:2103-2107[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Sacks, S. L.
1995.
Genital herpes simplex virus infection and treatment, p. 55-74.
In
S. L. Sacks, S. E. Straus, R. A. Whitley, and P. A. Griffiths (ed.), Clinical management of herpes virus infections. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 8.
|
Sacks, S. L.,
F. Y. Aoki,
F. Diaz-Mitoma,
J. Sellors, and S. D. Shafran for the Canadian Famciclovir Study Group.
1996.
Patient-initiated, twice-daily oral famciclovir for early recurrent genital herpes.
JAMA
276:44-49[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Sacks, S. L.,
J. Portony,
D. Lawee,
W. I. Schlech III,
F. Y. Aoki,
D. L. Tyrrell,
M. Poisson,
C. Bright,
J. Kaluski, and the Canadian Cooperative Study Group.
1987.
Clinical course of recurrent genital herpes and treatment with foscarnet cream: results of a Canadian multicenter trial.
J. Infect. Dis.
155:178-186[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Sacks, S. L.,
L. D. Tyrrell,
D. Lawee,
W. Schlech III,
M. J. Gill,
F. Y. Aoki,
A. Y. Martel,
J. Singer, and the Canadian Cooperative Study Group.
1991.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinic-initiated, Canadian multicenter trial of topical edoxudine 3.0% cream in the treatment of recurrent genital herpes.
J. Infect. Dis.
164:665-672[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Sacks, S. L.,
T. L. Varner,
K. S. Davies,
M. L. Rekart,
H. G. Stiver,
E. R. Delong, and P. W. Sellers.
1990.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, patient-initiated study of topical high- and low-dose interferon-alpha with nonoxynol-9 in the treatment of recurrent genital herpes.
J. Infect. Dis.
161:692-698[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Safrin, S.,
J. Cherrington, and H. S. Jaffe.
1997.
Clinical uses of cidofovir.
Rev. Med. Virol.
7:145-156.
[Medline] |
| 13.
|
Spruance, S. L.,
S. K. Tyring,
B. DeGregorio,
C. Miller,
K. Beutner, and the Valaciclovir HSV Study Group.
1996.
A large-scale, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of peroral valaciclovir for episodic treatment of recurrent herpes genitalis.
Arch. Intern. Med.
156:1729-1735[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1998, p. 2996-2999, Vol. 42, No. 11
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
De Clercq, E.
(2003). Clinical Potential of the Acyclic Nucleoside Phosphonates Cidofovir, Adefovir, and Tenofovir in Treatment of DNA Virus and Retrovirus Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
16: 569-596
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liekens, S., Neyts, J., De Clercq, E., Verbeken, E., Ribatti, D., Presta, M.
(2001). Inhibition of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2-induced Vascular Tumor Formation by the Acyclic Nucleoside Phosphonate Cidofovir. Cancer Res.
61: 5057-5064
[Abstract]
[Full Text]