Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3146-3152, Vol. 42, No. 12
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacokinetics, Distribution in Serum Lipoproteins and
Tissues, and Renal Toxicities of Amphotericin B and
Amphotericin B Lipid Complex in a Hypercholesterolemic Rabbit
Model: Single-Dose Studies
Kishor M.
Wasan,1,*
Allison L.
Kennedy,1
Shawn M.
Cassidy,1
Manisha
Ramaswamy,1
Lorilynne
Holtorf,1
Jenny Wen-Lin
Chou,1 and
P. Haydn
Pritchard2
Division of Pharmaceutics and
Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical
Sciences,1 and
Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of
Medicine,2 The University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
Received 8 May 1998/Returned for modification 30 August
1998/Accepted 11 September 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The purpose of this study was to determine if a relationship exists
among total serum and lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, the
severity of amphotericin B (AmpB)-induced renal toxicity, and the serum
pharmacokinetics of AmpB in hypercholesterolemic rabbits administered
AmpB and AmpB lipid complex (ABLC). After 10 days of
cholesterol-enriched diet (0.50% [wt/vol]) or regular rabbit diet
(control), each rabbit was administered a single intravenous bolus of
AmpB or ABLC (1.0 mg/kg of body weight). Blood samples were obtained
before administration and serially thereafter for the assessment of
serum pharmacokinetics, kidney toxicity, and serum lipoprotein
distribution. Rabbits were humanely sacrificed after all blood samples
were obtained, and tissues were harvested for drug analysis. Before
drug treatment, cholesterol-fed rabbits demonstrated marked increases
in total serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
cholesterol levels compared with levels in rabbits on a regular diet.
No significant differences in triglyceride levels were observed. A
significant increase in serum creatinine levels was observed in
cholesterol-fed and regular diet-fed rabbits administered AmpB.
However, the magnitude of this increase was 2.5-fold greater in
cholesterol-fed rabbits than in regular diet-fed rabbits. No
significant differences in triglyceride levels were observed. A
significant increase in serum creatinine levels was observed in
cholesterol-fed and regular diet-fed rabbits administered ABLC. Whereas
AmpB pharmacokinetics were significantly altered in cholesterol-fed
rabbits administered free AmpB, similar AmpB pharmacokinetics were
observed in both rabbit groups administered ABLC. Renal AmpB levels
were significantly increased in cholesterol-fed rabbits administered
AmpB compared with those in all other groups. Hepatic and lung AmpB
levels were elevated in cholesterol-fed rabbits administered free AmpB
compared to controls. In addition, hepatic, lung, and spleen AmpB
levels were significantly decreased in cholesterol-fed rabbits
administered ABLC compared to controls. An increased percentage of AmpB
was recovered in LDL-very-low-density lipoprotein fraction when free
AmpB was administered to cholesterol-fed rabbits compared with those in
all other groups. These findings suggest that increases in cholesterol,
specifically, LDL cholesterol levels, modify the disposition and renal
toxicity of free AmpB. However, the pharmacokinetics and renal toxicity
of ABLC were independent of elevations in total and LDL cholesterol levels.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Disseminated fungal infections such
as candidiasis, histoplasmosis, and aspergillosis are on the rise
(22). This increase is due in part to improved recognition
and diagnosis of fungal infections but also due to the prolonged
survival of patients with defects in their host defense mechanisms,
including patients with cancer, organ transplant recipients, diabetics,
and patients with AIDS (3, 22). In these patients, invasive
fungal infections may account for as many as 30% of deaths
(3). Despite the development of a number of new antifungal
agents (9), amphotericin B (AmpB) formulated as a suspension
remains one of the most effective agents in the treatment of systemic
fungal infections (16). However, AmpB use is often limited
by the development of kidney toxicity manifested by renal
vasoconstriction with a significant decrease in glomerular filtration
rate and renal plasma flow and by renal potassium and magnesium wasting
(8).
Incorporation of many drugs, including chemotherapeutic and antifungal
agents, into liposomes minimizes toxicity without loss in
pharmacological effect (1, 14, 20, 25). In addition, when
AmpB was complexed with lipid to form AmpB lipid complex (ABLC), it was
selectively taken up by mononuclear phagocytes and delivered
principally to the liver and the lung (15, 24). Survival of
mice infected with Histoplasma capsulatum was greater with
ABLC than with AmpB treatment, in part due to higher concentrations of
AmpB in liver and lung tissue (24). Moreover, these animals were less toxic than infected mice administered equivalent amounts of
AmpB. Recent studies by Bhamra et al. have suggested that the very low
levels of circulating protein-bound AmpB that they observed after
administration of ABLC to rats were a result of rapid tissue uptake
leading to reduced toxicity (2).
There is growing evidence suggesting that elevations in serum
low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are associated with
increases in AmpB-induced kidney toxicity (28-30) while
increases in serum triglycerides are associated with a reduction in
AmpB-induced kidney toxicity (5). Our preliminary studies
have further suggested that this phenomenon might be due to the
presence of high-affinity LDL receptors on kidney cells, which initiate
the uptake of AmpB-LDL complex (28). Furthermore, we suggest
that changes in lipoprotein lipid profile (cholesterol and
triglycerides) (7, 10, 12, 26) that occur in patients with
abnormal serum lipid levels (i.e., cancer, diabetic, and AIDS patients)
alter the distribution of AmpB. To date, most studies which have
investigated the importance of AmpB binding with serum lipids and
lipoproteins, particularly serum LDL, in modifying AmpB-induced kidney
toxicity have been conducted mainly with rats (5, 31, 32).
However, the behavior of lipoproteins in rats is very different from
that in other species (i.e., rabbits and humans). High-density
lipoproteins (HDLs) are the major carrier of cholesterol in rats, while
LDL is the major carrier of cholesterol in rabbits and humans
(6). Furthermore, the activity of lipid transfer protein I
(LTP I), a protein responsible for the transfer of serum lipid among
different lipoprotein subfractions (17) and of AmpB from HDL
to LDL (33), which is measurable in humans, is minimal in
rats (11).
Furthermore, it has been suggested that AmpB's pharmacokinetics may be
a result of the slow release of AmpB from a tissue or organ site
because of AmpB's affinity to bind to cholesterol (5, 31)
in serum lipoproteins or cell membranes. In addition, differences in
the pharmacokinetics and tissue distributions of AmpB but not those of
ABLC have been demonstrated between healthy rats and rats with
diabetes-induced hyperlipidemia, suggesting independence of the
liposomal delivery mechanism from the diabetic disease state and
endogenous triglyceride and cholesterol levels (31).
The purpose of this study was to determine if a relationship exists
among total serum and lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, the
severity of AmpB-induced kidney toxicity, and the serum
pharmacokinetics of AmpB in hypercholesterolemic rabbits administered
AmpB and ABLC. It was our working hypothesis that an elevation in serum LDL cholesterol concentration increases the binding of AmpB with serum
LDL, resulting in increased kidney toxicity. However, increases in
serum LDL cholesterol concentration would not modify the kidney toxicity profile of ABLC.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
AmpB and ABLC formulations.
AmpB, which contains sodium
deoxycholate (Fungizone) and is reconstituted in sterile water, was
purchased from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Newark, N.J.). The method of
preparing multilamellar liposomes containing AmpB (ABLC; Abelcet; The
Liposome Company, Princeton, N.J.) has been described previously
(2, 28). These liposomes use nontoxic phospholipids,
dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol,
and are reconstituted in normal saline.
Cholesterol-fed rabbit model.
All rabbits used for this
study were cared for in accordance with the principles promulgated by
the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the University of British
Columbia. They were housed within individual metabolism cages in a
12-h-dark-light-cycle animal facility with controlled temperature and
humidity. Water and food (Purina Rabbit Chow 5001) were unrestricted
throughout the study. All the rabbits were allowed 3 days to acclimate
to their environment prior to experimentation. New Zealand White female
rabbits (3.0 to 4.0 kg; Jeo-Bet Rabbits Ltd., Aldon, British Columbia,
Canada) that exhibit hypercholesterolemia (induced by a
cholesterol-enriched diet) were used (Table 1). The cholesterol-fed rabbits received Purina rabbit chow supplemented with 2.5% (wt/vol) coconut oil and 0.50% (wt/vol) cholesterol for 10 days prior to the
experiment. This was an "ideal model" because no kidney or liver
function and hematological profile abnormalities were observed in the
cholesterol-fed and age-matched New Zealand White rabbits, and 3-ml
blood samples were obtained without significant changes in blood flow
(18, 19). Furthermore, the rabbit was the appropriate experimental animal to use in these studies because the behavior and
structure of its lipoproteins are similar to those of humans (6). The operative technique for chronic catheter insertion was modified from that of Walsh and coworkers to include a heparin lock
device (Harvard Apparatus Canada, Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada)
(27). Briefly, a 2-cm incision was made in the right anterolateral cervical region about 3 cm posterior to the angle of the
jaw to expose the external jugular vein. A segment of the vein was
freed from subcutaneous fat just below the bifurcation of the internal
and external maxillary veins. A catheter was then flushed with sterile
saline and inserted carefully through an incision in the external
jugular venous wall until the catheter cuff was continuous with the
vein wall. Two silk suture ties were used to ligate the silastic
catheter to the external jugular vein. After two-way flow was
confirmed, the catheter was flushed with 1 ml of heparin (1,000 U/ml).
Rabbits were then brought to the recovery room for postoperative observation.
Serum lipoprotein separation.
The strategy for separating
serum into lipoprotein (HDL, LDL, very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL]
and lipoprotein-deficient [LPD]) fractions was step gradient
ultracentrifugation (33). Rabbit serum samples (3.0 ml) from
the 0.25-h blood collection were placed into centrifuge tubes, and
their solvent densities were adjusted to 1.25 g/ml by the addition of
solid sodium bromide (0.34 g/ml of serum). Once the sodium bromide had
dissolved into the serum, 2.8 ml of the highest-density sodium bromide
solution (density of 1.21 g/ml, which represents the HDL fraction) was layered on top of the serum solution. Then, 2.8 ml of the second sodium
bromide solution (density of 1.063 g/ml, which represents the LDL
fraction) was layered on top of the sample, followed by 2.8 ml of the
third sodium bromide solution (density of 1.006 g/ml, which represents
the VLDL and chylomicron fraction). Upon completion of layering with
the sodium bromide density solutions, four distinct regions of
progressively greater densities (from the top to the bottom of the
tube) were observed. All sodium bromide solutions were kept at 4°C
prior to the layering of the density gradient. The centrifuge tubes
were placed in an SW-41 Ti swinging bucket rotor (Beckman Canada) and
centrifuged at 40,000 rpm (288,000 × g; k factor = 128), at a temperature of 15°C for 18 h (L8-80 M; Beckman
Canada). Following ultracentrifugation, each density layer was removed
by using a Pasteur pipette and the volume of each lipoprotein fraction
was measured.
To ensure that the lipoprotein distribution of AmpB was a result of its
association with each lipoprotein and not a result of the density of
the formulation, the distribution of AmpB formulation reconstituted in
sterile water (Fungizone) and ABLC reconstituted in normal saline
within LPD serum was determined. The majority of AmpB (>90%) was
found in the density range of >1.21 g/ml, suggesting that the AmpB
distribution within the ultracentrifuge tubes following incubation in
rabbit serum is not a function of formulation density (data not shown).
Characterization of lipoproteins.
Lipoprotein preparations
were characterized with respect to lipid and protein composition.
Cholesterol (esterified and unesterified), triglyceride, and protein
were quantitated by established colorimetric and fluorometric
techniques as previously described (31, 33).
Measurement of AmpB.
AmpB levels in serum, tissue, and
lipoprotein fractions were analyzed by high-pressure liquid
chromatography as previously described (31, 33).
Assessment of renal function.
To assess renal function,
serum creatinine concentrations prior to and 10 h following the
administration of AmpB or ABLC were measured by standard enzymatic
reactions (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Mo.). For the purposes of this
study and based on our preliminary studies with rats (31)
and humans (29), the criterion for measurable kidney
toxicity was set as a 50% increase in serum creatinine concentration
from baseline. Ten hours was chosen because initial studies
demonstrated that, following the administration of a single intravenous
bolus of AmpB (1 mg/kg of body weight) to rabbits, serum creatinine
reached its maximum elevation from baseline 10 h following the
dose (data not shown).
Experimental design.
Cholesterol-fed (n = 10) or normolipidemic (n = 10) female New Zealand
White rabbits (3 to 4 kg) were administered a single intravenous dose
through the jugular vein of either AmpB or ABLC (1 mg/kg). Preliminary
studies have shown that an AmpB dose of 1 mg/kg is sufficient to treat
experimental candidiasis and yet exhibit measurable kidney toxicity
(31-33). In addition, four cholesterol-fed and
normolipidemic rabbits were administered the vehicle controls sterile
water and normal saline. Following AmpB or ABLC administration, serial
blood samples were obtained and stored in centrifuge tubes prior to and
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the injection. Serum
was harvested and stored at 4°C prior to analysis to prevent any
redistribution of drug. Preliminary studies have shown that AmpB is not
redistributed between lipoprotein fractions at 4°C (33).
After the 48-h sample, each rabbit was humanely sacrificed and the
liver, right kidney, lung, spleen, and heart were removed, dried, and
weighed. Each organ was stored at
20°C until analysis.
Pharmacokinetic analysis.
The pharmacokinetic parameters
mean residence time (MRT), total body clearance (CL), and volume of
distribution at steady state (VSS) were
estimated by compartmental analysis using the WINNONLIN nonlinear
estimation program (23). It was concluded that the AmpB
serum concentration data fit a two-compartment model based on goodness
of fit and residual sum of square estimations using the WINNONLIN
program. Concentrations of AmpB in serum were plotted against time on
log-linear graph paper and
and terminal half-lives were estimated
by the method of residuals (23). Area under the AmpB
concentration-time curve (AUC) was estimated by trapedzoidal rule
(23).
Statistical analysis.
AmpB pharmacokinetics, tissue
concentration, lipoprotein distribution, serum creatinine
concentration, and lipid levels were compared between drug treatment
and animal groups by analysis of variance (PCANOVA; Human Systems
Dynamics). Critical differences were assessed by Tukey post hoc tests.
A difference was considered significant if the probability of chance
explaining the results was reduced to less than 5% (P < 0.05). All data was expressed as means ± standard deviations.
 |
RESULTS |
Mean weight of cholesterol-fed rabbits was not significantly
different from that of regular diet-fed rabbits prior to drug administration (3.77 ± 0.35 versus 3.21 ± 0.24 kg).
Similarly, kidney, liver, lung, spleen, and heart weights were not
different between cholesterol-fed and regular diet-fed rabbits (data
not shown).
Total and LDL serum cholesterol concentrations were significantly
higher in cholesterol-fed than in regular diet-fed rabbits prior to and
10 h following drug administration (Table
1). However, serum creatinine levels were
not significantly different between cholesterol-fed and regular
diet-fed rabbits prior to drug administration (Table 1). Significant
increases in percentages of baseline serum creatinine levels were
observed in cholesterol-fed and regular diet-fed rabbits administered
AmpB (Table 1); no significant differences from baseline were found in
cholesterol-fed or regular diet-fed rabbits administered ABLC (Table
1). Increases in total serum and LDL cholesterol levels were observed
in rabbits receiving a cholesterol-enriched diet (0.5% [wt/vol]) for
10 days compared to rabbits receiving a regular diet (Fig.
1 and Table 1). However, no differences
in total serum or lipoprotein triglyceride levels were observed (data
not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Biochemical characteristics of serum and pharmacokinetic
parameters of drug after a single intravenous dose of AmpB and ABLC (1 mg/kg) in control and cholesterol-fed (0.05% [wt/vol]
cholesterol) rabbitsa
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Total serum cholesterol concentration in rabbits fed a
cholesterol-enriched diet (0.5% [wt/vol]) and a regular diet for 12 days. Data are shown as means ± standard deviations (n = 10). *, P < 0.05 versus regular diet-fed
rabbits.
|
|
AUC after a single intravenous dose of AmpB in cholesterol-fed rabbits
was significantly higher than the AUC in regular diet-fed rabbits,
whereas no significant differences were observed in AUC in rabbits
administered ABLC (Table 1 and Fig. 2).
The
half-life was prolonged in cholesterol-fed rabbits administered
AmpB and ABLC compared to that for regular diet-fed rabbits
administered AmpB and ABLC, respectively (Table 1).
VSS was lower in cholesterol-fed rabbits than in
regular diet-fed rabbits administered AmpB (Table 1). However,
VSS was greater in rabbits administered ABLC
than in rabbits administered AmpB (Table 1). Systemic CL was decreased in cholesterol-fed rabbits compared to regular diet-fed rabbits administered AmpB (Table 1). However, CL was elevated in rabbits administered ABLC compared to rabbits administered AmpB (Table 1). The
and
half-lives and MRT were shorter in cholesterol-fed rabbits
administered ABLC than in cholesterol-fed rabbits administered AmpB
(Table 1). In addition, AmpB AUC was significantly lower while
VSS and CL were significantly greater in
cholesterol-fed rabbits administered ABLC than in cholesterol-fed
rabbits administered AmpB (Table 1).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
AmpB serum concentration-versus-time curve on a
log-linear graph following a single intravenous dose of AmpB or ABLC (1 mg/kg) to cholesterol-fed and regular diet-fed rabbits. Data are shown
as means ± standard deviations (n = 5).
|
|
Kidney tissue concentrations of AmpB were greater in cholesterol-fed
rabbits administered AmpB than in other groups (Table 2). Likewise, liver and lung
concentrations of AmpB were greater in cholesterol-fed than in regular
diet-fed rabbits administered AmpB (Table 2). In agreement with our
previous studies with diabetic rats (22), lung AmpB
concentrations 48 h after a single intravenous administration of
AmpB were markedly lower than those after ABLC administration in
animals fed a regular diet (Table 2). Both the liver and lung had
significantly lower concentrations of AmpB in cholesterol-fed rabbits
than in regular diet-fed rabbits following the administration of ABLC
(Table 2). Spleen AmpB concentrations were significantly lower in
cholesterol-fed rabbits than in regular diet-fed rabbits administered
ABLC (Table 2). Heart AmpB concentrations were significantly greater in
cholesterol-fed rabbits than in regular diet-fed rabbits administered
AmpB (Table 2). In regular diet-fed rabbits, AmpB liver, lung, and
spleen concentrations were significantly greater in rabbits
administered ABLC than in those administered AmpB (Table 2). However,
in cholesterol-fed rabbits AmpB kidney, liver, and heart concentrations
were significantly lower in rabbits administered ABLC than in those
administered AmpB (Table 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
AmpB tissue distribution following a single intravenous
dose of free AmpB and ABLC (1 mg/kg) in control and cholesterol-fed
(0.5% [wt/vol] cholesterol) rabbitsa
|
|
The in vivo serum distribution of AmpB was determined at 15 min
following the administration of AmpB and ABLC. A greater percentage of
AmpB was recovered in the HDL and LDL-VLDL fractions following the
administration of AmpB to cholesterol-fed rabbits than that for regular
diet-fed rabbits (Fig. 3A). However, a
lower percentage of AmpB was recovered in the LPD serum fraction (which
contains albumin and
-1-glycoprotein) following administration to
cholesterol-fed rabbits than after that to regular diet-fed rabbits
(Fig. 3A). No differences in serum distribution were observed following
the administration of ABLC to cholesterol-fed and regular diet-fed rabbits (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
In vivo serum distribution at 15 min following the
administration of AmpB (A) or ABLC (B) to cholesterol-fed or regular
diet-fed rabbits. Data shown are means ± standard deviations
(n = 5). *, P < 0.05 versus AmpB or
ABLC regular diet. HDL, high-density lipoproteins; LDL/VLDL, low- and
very low-density lipoproteins; LPD, lipoprotein-deficient serum, which
includes albumin and -1-glycoprotein.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The administration of AmpB has been limited by its dose-dependent
kidney toxicity, which has not been predictable by monitoring serum
drug concentration (22). To date, it has been assumed that
the serum drug concentration is directly related to concentration at
the site of action. Error in this assumption may be due to underlying
or changing disease states or altered drug protein binding parameters.
Since AmpB is an example of a drug that binds to lipoproteins both in
vivo and in vitro (33), we studied the influence of
experimentally induced hypercholesterolemia on drug disposition and
toxicity in rabbits.
There were considerable differences in the disposition, lipoprotein
distribution, and tissue distribution of AmpB following the
administration of free AmpB to hypercholesterolemic rabbits compared to
their normolipidemic counterparts. AUC was elevated in
hypercholesterolemic rabbits. This result could be explained by the
fact that the systemic clearance of free AmpB was significantly lower
in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Furthermore, the volume of
distribution of free AmpB was significantly lower in
hypercholesterolemic than in normolipidemic rabbits, suggesting binding
differences accounting for changes in disposition.
Since AmpB is significantly bound to lipoproteins, we expected a
greater AUC with a reduction in clearance in the presence of
hypercholesterolemia. We hypothesize that this may be due to the
drug's preferential association with LDLs, which are increased in
hypercholesterolemia. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observed a
greater percentage of AmpB recovered in the VLDL-LDL fraction when the
drug was administered to hypercholesterolemic rabbits than when it was
administered to normolipidemic rabbits (Fig. 3A). These findings
suggest that VLDL-LDL may be an important mediator of drug disposition.
In addition, we hypothesize that AmpB's associations with lipoproteins
have a major impact on the safety of this drug since AmpB is often
administered to patients with abnormal serum cholesterol and
triglyceride metabolism (7, 10, 12, 26). There is growing
evidence that supports our hypothesis that increases in cholesterol
concentrations increase the renal toxicity of AmpB, while an elevation
in serum triglyceride levels decreases AmpB-induced renal toxicity.
Specifically, when AmpB was administered to patients with leukemia
(13) and immunocompromised patients who exhibited lower
plasma cholesterol concentrations (<100 mg/dl) (21),
AmpB-induced renal toxicity was decreased. Chabot and coworkers
observed no measurable renal toxicity when AmpB was administered to
cancer patients who exhibited hypocholesterolemia (4). Our
preliminary findings with humans suggest that patients with higher
serum LDL cholesterol levels and in turn a greater binding of AmpB with serum LDL are more susceptible to AmpB-induced kidney toxicity (29). In this study, increased AUC of AmpB in
hypercholesterolemic rabbits administered free AmpB was associated with
increased renal toxicity. Similarly, AmpB levels in renal tissue of
these rabbits were greater than those found in normolipidemic rabbits.
In contrast, renal toxicity was not observed in either rabbit group
administered ABLC, which is supported by similar levels of AmpB being
found in renal tissue (Table 2). Taken together with the lipoprotein distribution data, it appears that the increased association of AmpB
with lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia (Fig. 3A) magnifies AmpB-induced renal toxicity.
The pharmacokinetics and tissue distributions of ABLC were not markedly
altered in the presence of hypercholesterolemia. Whereas the transport
of free AmpB was influenced by LDL cholesterol concentrations, preferential uptake of ABLC into the reticuloendothelial system is most
likely independent of LDL cholesterol levels. Furthermore, we have
observed that a greater percentage of AmpB associated with serum HDL
when ABLC was administered to these animals. An increase in LDL
cholesterol levels did not alter this distribution (Fig. 3B). In
contrast to observations with free AmpB administration, no change in
renal toxicity was found with ABLC dosing. This data is consistent with
our previous work with rats (31) and with others
demonstrating a nephroprotective effect of AmpB delivered in a lipid
complex (13, 24).
Bhamra and coworkers have observed similar concentration-time curves of
AmpB and ABLC following administration to rats (2) as we did
following administration to rabbits (Fig. 2). They further reported
that when rat plasma was spiked with free AmpB and incubated for 3 h at 37°C most of the drug was associated with the VLDL and LPD
plasma fractions. In addition, the distribution of released AmpB from
ABLC resulted in a greater association with the HDL fraction and less
association with the VLDL fraction immediately after spiking. More than
50% of AmpB from samples spiked with ABLC or AmpB was associated with
the LPD plasma fraction. These findings are in disagreement with our
results (Fig. 3). The differences could be attributed to two factors:
(i) their lipoprotein distribution was determined in vitro while our
lipoprotein distribution was determined in vivo and (ii) their studies
were completed in rat plasma while our studies were completed in rabbit
serum. Rabbits are the appropriate experimental animals to use when
determining lipoprotein distribution because the behavior and structure
of rabbit lipoproteins (6) and LTP I function
(11) are similar to those for humans. However, the behavior
of lipoproteins in rats is very different from that in humans. HDLs are
the major carrier of cholesterol in rats while LDL is the major carrier of cholesterol in rabbits and humans (6). Furthermore, the activity of a lipid transfer protein (LTP I), a protein responsible for
the transfer of serum lipid among different lipoprotein subfractions (17) and of AmpB from HDL to LDL (33), while
measurable in rabbits and humans, is minimal in rats (11).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated significant differences in the
pharmacokinetics, serum lipoprotein and tissue distributions, and
drug-induced renal toxicities of free AmpB in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. However, the pharmacokinetics, lipoprotein distributions, and
extents of AmpB-induced renal toxicity following ABLC administration were unchanged in the hypercholesterolemic model, suggesting an independence of this delivery mechanism from serum lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported with funding from the Medical Research
Council of Canada (grants MA-14484 and MT-14484 to K.M.W. and P.H.P.).
We thank Michael Boyd from the Acute Care Animal Unit at the University
of British Columbia for his surgical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Faculty of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2146 East
Mall Ave., Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Z3. Phone: (604) 822-4889. Fax:
(604) 822-3035. E-mail: Kwasan{at}unixg.ubc.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Balazsovits, J. A.,
L. D. Mayer,
M. B. Bally,
P. R. Cullis,
M. McDonnell,
R. S. Ginsberg, and R. E. Falk.
1989.
Analysis of the effect of liposomal encapsulation on the vesicant properties, acute and cardiac toxicities, and antitumor efficacy of doxorubicin.
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
23:81-86[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bhamra, R.,
A. Sa'ad,
L. E. Bolcsak,
A. S. Janoff, and C. E. Swenson.
1997.
Behavior of amphotericin B lipid complex in plasma in vitro and in the circulation in rats.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:886-892[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Bodey, G. P.
1986.
Infection in cancer patients: a continuing association.
Am. J. Med.
81:11-26[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Chabot, G. G.,
R. Pazdur,
F. A. Valeriote, and L. H. H. Baker.
1989.
Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of continuous infusion of amphotericin B in cancer patients.
J. Pharm. Sci.
78:307-310[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chavanet, P.,
V. Joly,
D. Rigaud,
J. Bolard,
C. Carbon, and P. Yenni.
1994.
Influence of diet on experimental toxicity of amphotericin B deoxycholate.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:963-968[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Davis, R. A., and J. E. Vance.
1996.
Structure, assembly and secretion of lipoproteins, p. 473-493.
In
D. E. Vance, and J. E. Vance (ed.), Biochemistry of lipids, lipoproteins and membranes. Elsevier, New York, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Feingold, K. R.,
R. M. Krauss,
M. Pang,
W. Doerrler,
P. Jensen, and C. Grunfeld.
1993.
The hypertriglyceridemia of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an increased prevalence of low-density lipoprotein subclass pattern.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
76:1423-1431[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Gardier, A. M.,
D. Mathe,
X. Guedeney,
J. Barre,
C. Benvenutti,
N. Navarro,
L. Vernillet,
D. Loisance,
J. P. Cachera,
B. Jacotot, and J. P. Tillement.
1993.
Effects of plasma lipid levels on blood distribution and pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A.
Ther. Drug. Monit.
15:274-280[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gates, C., and R. J. Pinney.
1993.
Amphotericin B and its delivery by liposomal and lipid formulations.
J. Clin. Pharm. Ther.
18:147-153[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Grunfeld, C.,
M. Pang,
W. Doerrler,
J. K. Shigenaga,
P. Jensen, and K. R. Feingold.
1992.
Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
74:2045-2051.
|
| 11.
|
Ha, Y. C., and P. J. Barter.
1982.
Differences in plasma cholesteryl ester transfer activity in sixteen vertebrate species.
Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
71:265-269.
|
| 12.
|
Kritchevsky, S. B.,
T. C. Wilcosky,
D. L. Morris,
K. N. Truong, and H. A. Tyroler.
1991.
Changes in plasma lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol and weight prior to the diagnosis of cancer.
Cancer Res.
51:3198-3203[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Lopez-Berestein, G.
1988.
Liposomes as carriers of antifungal drugs.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
544:590-597[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Lopez-Berestein, G.,
R. Mehta,
R. L. Hopfer,
K. Mills,
L. Kasi,
K. Mehta,
V. Fainstein,
M. Luna,
E. M. Hersh, and R. Juliano.
1983.
Treatment and prophylaxis of disseminated infection due to Candida albicans in mice with liposomal-encapsulated amphotericin B.
J. Infect. Dis.
147:939-945[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Lopez-Berestein, G.,
M. G. Rosenblum, and R. Mehta.
1984.
Altered tissue distribution of amphotericin B by liposomal encapsulation: comparison of normal mice to mice infected with Candida albicans.
Cancer Drug Delivery
1:199-205[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Meyer, R. D.
1992.
Current role of therapy with amphotericin B.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
14:S154-S160.
|
| 17.
|
Morton, R. E., and D. A. Zilversmit.
1982.
Purification and characterization of lipid transfer protein(s) from human lipoprotein-deficient plasma.
J. Lipid Res.
23:1058-1067[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Norido, F.,
A. Zatta,
C. Fiorito,
M. Prosdocimi, and G. Weber.
1993.
Hematologic and biochemical analysis profiles of selectively bred WHHL rabbits.
Lab. Anim. Sci.
43:319-323[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
O'Meara, N. M.,
R. A. Devery,
D. Owens,
P. B. Collins,
A. H. Johnson, and G. H. Tomkin.
1991.
Serum lipoproteins and cholesterol metabolism in two hypercholesterolemic rabbit models.
Diabetologia
34:139-143[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Perez-Soler, R.,
A. R. Khokhar,
M. P. Hacker, and G. Lopez-Berestein.
1986.
Toxicity and antitumor activity of cis-bis-cyclopentenecarboxylato-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II) encapsulated in multilamellar vesicles.
Cancer Res.
46:6269-6273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Pontaini, D. R.,
D. Sun,
J. W. Brown,
S. I. Shahied,
O. J. Plescia,
C. P. Schaffner,
G. Lopez-Berestein, and P. S. Sarin.
1989.
Inhibition of HIV replication by liposomal encapsulated amphotericin B.
Antivir. Res.
11:119-125[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Rothon, D. A.,
R. G. Mathias, and M. T. Schechter.
1994.
Prevalence of HIV infection in provincial prisons in British Columbia.
Can. Med. Assoc. J.
151:S154-S160.
|
| 23.
|
Shargel, L., and A. B. C. Yu.
1985.
Multicompartment models, p. 51-67.
In
L. Shargel, and A. B. C. Yu (ed.), Applied biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Conn.
|
| 24.
|
Taylor, R. L.,
D. M. Williams,
P. C. Craven,
J. R. Graybill,
D. J. Drutz, and W. E. Magee.
1982.
Amphotericin B in liposomes: a novel therapy for histoplasmosis.
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
125:610-611[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Vadiei, K.,
G. Lopez-Berestein,
R. Perez-Soler, and D. R. Luke.
1991.
Tissue distribution and in vivo immunosuppressive activity of liposomal cyclosporine.
Drug Metab. Dispos.
19:1147-1151[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Vitols, S.,
G. Gahrton,
M. Bjorkholm, and C. Peterson.
1985.
Hypercholesterolemia in malignancy due to elevated low-density lipoprotein receptor activity in tumor cells: evidence from studies in patients with leukemia.
Lancet
iv:1150-1154.
|
| 27.
|
Walsh, T. J.,
J. Bacher, and P. A. Pizzo.
1988.
Chronic silastic central venous catheterization for reduction, maintenance and support of persistent granulocytopenia in rabbits.
Lab. Anim. Sci.
38:467-471[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Wasan, K. M.,
M. G. Rosenblum,
L. Cheung, and G. Lopez-Berestein.
1994.
Influence of lipoproteins on renal cytotoxicity and antifungal activity of amphotericin B.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:223-227[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Wasan, K. M., and J. S. Conklin.
1997.
Enhanced amphotericin B nephrotoxicity in intensive care patients with elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:78-80[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Wasan, K. M., and S. M. Cassidy.
1998.
The role of plasma lipoproteins in modifying the biological activity of hydrophobic drugs.
J. Pharm. Sci.
87:411-424[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Wasan, K. M.,
K. Vadiei,
G. Lopez-Berestein, and D. R. Luke.
1990.
Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and toxicity of free and liposomal amphotericin B in diabetic rats.
J. Infect. Dis.
161:562-566[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Wasan, K. M.,
V. B. Grossie, Jr., and G. Lopez-Berestein.
1994.
Concentrations in serum and distribution in tissue of free and liposomal amphotericin B in rats during continuous Intralipid infusion.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2224-2226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Wasan, K. M.,
R. E. Morton,
M. G. Rosenblum, and G. Lopez-Berestein.
1994.
Decreased toxicity of liposomal amphotericin B is due to the association of amphotericin B with high density lipoproteins: role of lipid transfer protein.
J. Pharm. Sci.
83:1006-1010[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3146-3152, Vol. 42, No. 12
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Meletiadis, J., Chanock, S., Walsh, T. J.
(2006). Human Pharmacogenomic Variations and Their Implications for Antifungal Efficacy. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
19: 763-787
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Groll, A. H., Lyman, C. A., Petraitis, V., Petraitiene, R., Armstrong, D., Mickiene, D., Alfaro, R. M., Schaufele, R. L., Sein, T., Bacher, J., Walsh, T. J.
(2006). Compartmentalized intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B and its lipid formulations.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3418-3423
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hong, Y., Shaw, P. J., Nath, C. E., Yadav, S. P., Stephen, K. R., Earl, J. W., McLachlan, A. J.
(2006). Population Pharmacokinetics of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Pediatric Patients with Malignant Diseases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 935-942
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bartlett, K., Yau, E., Hartsel, S. C., Hamer, A., Tsai, G., Bizzotto, D., Wasan, K. M.
(2004). Effect of Heat-Treated Amphotericin B on Renal and Fungal Cytotoxicity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 333-336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Larabi, M., Pages, N., Pons, F., Appel, M., Gulik, A., Schlatter, J., Bouvet, S., Barratt, G.
(2004). Study of the toxicity of a new lipid complex formulation of amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother
53: 81-88
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Risovic, V., Boyd, M., Choo, E., Wasan, K. M.
(2003). Effects of Lipid-Based Oral Formulations on Plasma and Tissue Amphotericin B Concentrations and Renal Toxicity in Male Rats. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3339-3342
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Espuelas, M. S., Legrand, P., Campanero, M. A., Appel, M., Cheron, M., Gamazo, C., Barratt, G., Irache, J. M.
(2003). Polymeric carriers for amphotericin B: in vitro activity, toxicity and therapeutic efficacy against systemic candidiasis in neutropenic mice. J Antimicrob Chemother
52: 419-427
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Walsh, T. J., Goodman, J. L., Pappas, P., Bekersky, I., Buell, D. N., Roden, M., Barrett, J., Anaissie, E. J.
(2001). Safety, Tolerance, and Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B (AmBisome) in Patients Infected with Aspergillus Species and Other Filamentous Fungi: Maximum Tolerated Dose Study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 3487-3496
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kwong, E. H., Ramaswamy, M., Bauer, E. A., Hartsel, S. C., Wasan, K. M.
(2001). Heat Treatment of Amphotericin B Modifies Its Serum Pharmacokinetics, Tissue Distribution, and Renal Toxicity following Administration of a Single Intravenous Dose to Rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 2060-2063
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Townsend, R. W., Zutshi, A., Bekersky, I.
(2001). Biodistribution of 4-[14C]Cholesterol-AmBisome following a Single Intravenous Administration to Rats. Drug Metab. Dispos.
29: 681-685
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramaswamy, M., Peteherych, K. D., Kennedy, A. L., Wasan, K. M.
(2001). Amphotericin B Lipid Complex or Amphotericin B Multiple-Dose Administration to Rabbits with Elevated Plasma Cholesterol Levels: Pharmacokinetics in Plasma and Blood, Plasma Lipoprotein Levels, Distribution in Tissues, and Renal Toxicities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 1184-1191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Echevarría, I., Barturen, C., Renedo, M. J., Trocóniz, I. F., Dios-Viéitez, M. C.
(2000). Comparative Pharmacokinetics, Tissue Distributions, and Effects on Renal Function of Novel Polymeric Formulations of Amphotericin B and Amphotericin B-Deoxycholate in Rats. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44: 898-904
[Abstract]
[Full Text]