Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3153-3156, Vol. 42, No. 12
Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center and
Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
Received 10 September 1997/Returned for modification 27 May
1998/Accepted 17 September 1998
The antibacterial activities of levofloxacin, erythromycin, and
rifampin against intracellular Legionella pneumophila
L-1033, serogroup 1, were studied. In an in vitro system utilizing
adherent human monocytes, L. pneumophila L-1033, a
phagocytosis time period of 1 h, and antibiotic (levofloxacin,
erythromycin, and/or rifampin) at 1 to 10 times the MIC, the CFU/ml
values for the monocyte lysate were determined during 0- to 4-day time
periods. The decrease in CFU/ml with levofloxacin at pH 7.4 was rapid,
occurring within 24 h, and was drug concentration dependent
(P < 0.01). The decrease in CFU with rifampin was
first observed at 48 h (P < 0.01), while only a
minimal decrease in CFU/ml was observed with erythromycin. Combination
of levofloxacin and rifampin and of levofloxacin and erythromycin at
ten times their MICs significantly decreased the CFU/ml value
(P < 0.01), to the value attained by levofloxacin alone, while combination of rifampin and erythromycin did not. Removal
of levofloxacin after 24 h of incubation resulted in regrowth of
L. pneumophila L-1033, while a continued slow decrease in
CFU/ml was seen following rifampin removal; CFU/ml values were
unaffected by the removal of erythromycin. At 4 days, and even in
assays performed following antibiotic removal, the CFU/ml value
continued to be lower in the levofloxacin and rifampin assays than in
the assays with erythromycin. Levofloxacin had a significantly higher bactericidal activity against L. pneumophila L-1033 than
erythromycin or rifampin. In these assays, the addition of erythromycin
or rifampin did not affect the antibacterial activity of levofloxacin.
Intracellular infections caused by
bacterial pathogens are common. They can cause serious disease in
compromised hosts, may relapse, and can be difficult to treat in spite
of apparent in vitro susceptibilities of the pathogen to appropriate
antibiotics (13, 14, 17). Legionellosis is one example of
such serious intracellular infections (11, 15, 17). Because
Legionella pneumophila causes intracellular infection, the
antimicrobial agent of choice must penetrate the target cell, reach the
site of bacterial replication, and exert its antimicrobial effect on the intracellular organism (25, 26).
The treatment of Legionnaires' disease to date has included
erythromycin as the first-choice antimicrobial agent, followed by newer
macrolides, doxycycline, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7,
8). Fluoroquinolones have been found to be active against L. pneumophila in vitro in more recent studies, including
studies performed with cell-associated organisms (1, 3-5, 8, 12, 19, 21). Furthermore, rifampin is commonly used as an adjunct drug in seriously ill patients with L. pneumophila
infections (8). This is done to maximize clinical efficacy
and minimize the selection of resistant mutants, although the
development of resistance to rifampin could not be shown in a guinea
pig model of Legionnaires' disease (6).
Levofloxacin is the more active isomer of the two optically active
isomers of ofloxacin (10). Its DNA gyrase activity is similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Concentrations of levofloxacin in
serum and tissues exceed those of ciprofloxacin, and the half-life of
levofloxacin is longer, allowing daily single-dose administration in
many cases (24). Studies of the in vitro activity of
levofloxacin against L. pneumophila have demonstrated that
this new fluoroquinolone is more active than erythromycin or ofloxacin
(1). Furthermore, recent observations have demonstrated that
the intracellular concentration of levofloxacin is at least six times
the extracellular concentration (20).
This study was performed to define the ability of levofloxacin to
enhance the inhibitory or bactericidal activity of human monocytes
against L. pneumophila and to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin against intracellular L. pneumophila with those
of erythromycin and rifampin, used singly or in combination.
(This work was presented in part at the 36th Interscience Conference on
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, La., 15 to 18 September 1996 [1a].)
Preparation of human monocytes.
Monocytes were prepared from
heparinized blood of healthy human donors who had signed the
informed-consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board of the
Albany Medical College/Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, N.Y.
Mononuclear cells were separated from whole blood by using Histopaque
1077 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), giving a 98% pure mononuclear cell
preparation. The separated cells were resuspended in Hanks balanced
salt solution with 20% fetal calf serum (FCS) to a concentration of
2 × 106/ml. Cell viability before and after exposure
to antibiotics in the control and in the phagocytic system was Bacterial strain.
L. pneumophila L-1033, serogroup 1, isolated from the sputum of a patient with pneumonia, was obtained from
the Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State
Department of Health, Albany. The isolate was kept frozen in skim milk
at Antimicrobial agents.
Levofloxacin was a gift from the
R. W. Johnson Research Institute. Erythromycin and rifampin were
obtained from Sigma. All antibiotic solutions were made fresh for each
experiment in accordance with the suppliers' instructions. Using the
macrodilution technique, the MIC (in micrograms per milliliter) for
each drug was determined in BYE broth (16, 18). The MICs of
levofloxacin, erythromycin, and rifampin for L. pneumophila
L-1033 were 0.03, 0.5, and 0.001 µg/ml, respectively.
Opsonization.
Pooled heat-inactivated normal human serum
obtained from four donors was diluted to 20% (vol/vol) in RPMI 1640 and was used to opsonize L. pneumophila L-1033 at 35°C for
1 h.
Study design.
Human mononuclear cells at a density of 2 × 106/ml were delivered in a 1-ml volume and allowed to
adhere to the wells of 24-well plates (Corning/Costar Corp., Cambridge,
Mass.) for 2.5 h. Monocytes adhered to the wells in a contiguous
layer. Medium and nonadherent cells, including lymphocytes, were
aspirated from the wells. The adherent monocyte layer was gently washed
once. Opsonized L. pneumophila L-1033 in RPMI 1640 plus 20%
FCS (107 cells; 1-ml volume) was added to the wells. The
time period allotted for phagocytosis was 1 h. Unphagocytized
bacteria were removed by aspiration, and the cell layer was washed once
with RPMI 1640. Antibiotics were added to duplicate wells singly at
their MICs and at 2, 4, and 10 times their MICs, and they were added in
combination at 10 times their MICs or attainable serum drug
concentrations. Thus, the antibiotic concentrations used in the assays
were as follows: levofloxacin at 0.03, 0.06, 0.12, 0.3, and 5.0 µg/ml; rifampin at 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, 0.01, and 8.0 µg/ml; and
erythromycin at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 µg/ml. Following
incubation of the plates at 35°C for 0, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h, the
supernatant was removed, monocytes were lysed with distilled
H2O, and the lysate was quantitatively plated in duplicate
on BCYE agar. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 35°C,
colonies counted, and the numbers of surviving bacteria were
determined. A subset of experiments involved the removal of the
antibiotic from the wells 24 h after its addition. The wells were
then sampled at 48, 72, and 96 h as described above. Another
subset of experiments was performed at pH 6.0. The medium (RPMI 1640 plus 20% FCS) was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 1 N HCl. This medium was
used for the final suspension of monocytes and bacteria in the
experiment. All experiments at pH 7.4 and 6.0 were performed three times.
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Antibacterial Effects of Levofloxacin,
Erythromycin, and Rifampin in a Human Monocyte System against
Legionella pneumophila
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
98%
as determined by the trypan blue exclusion test.
70°C prior to the experiment; it was then subcultured on
buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE) agar supplemented with 5%
-ketoglutarate (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and
incubated at 35°C. Prior to each experiment, colonies from a 48-h
culture were subcultured from BCYE agar into BYE broth and incubated
for 18 h at 35°C in a shaking water bath. The bacteria were then
diluted to 107 CFU/ml in RPMI 1640 plus 20% FCS and kept
at 4°C until their addition to the adherent phagocytic cells.
Confirmation of this final bacterial concentration (in CFU per
milliliter) was done by duplicate counts of bacteria cultured on BCYE agar.
TABLE 1.
The effect of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin
used singly at their MICs and at two and four times their MICs against
intracellular L. pneumophila L-1033 (pH 7.4)
TABLE 2.
The effect of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin,
at ten times their MICs, used singly and in combination against
intracellular L. pneumophila L-1033 (pH 7.4)
TABLE 3.
The effect of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin at
maximum attainable serum drug concentrations against intracellular
L. pneumophila L-1033 (pH 7.4)
TABLE 4.
The effect of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin,
at 10 times their MICs, used singly and in combination against
Legionella pneumophila L-1033 (pH 6.0)
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1 demonstrated the effects of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin, used singly (at their MICs and at two and four times their MICs), in the monocyte bactericidal assay at pH 7.4 and 35°C. Each of the three antimicrobial agents demonstrated a significant decrease in CFU per milliliter compared to that of the control (P < 0.01). While results for the study using levofloxacin at the MIC were different from those of that drug at two and four times the MIC (P < 0.05), there was no statistically significant difference in the results with rifampin or erythromycin; therefore, the data for studies at the MIC and at two and four times the MICs for erythromycin and for rifampin were combined. At the MIC, levofloxacin demonstrated significantly greater bactericidal activity than rifampin or erythromycin (P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the results of studies with levofloxacin at two and four times the MIC; therefore, these data were combined.
Table 2 demonstrates the effects of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin (at 10 times their MICs), used singly and in combination, in the monocyte bactericidal assay at pH 7.4 and 35°C. Levofloxacin demonstrated the most rapid and effective activity in decreasing the CFU per milliliter (P < 0.01). There was not a statistically significant difference between the results obtained with levofloxacin alone and those obtained when levofloxacin was used in combination with rifampin or erythromycin. In contrast, the CFU-per-milliliter values obtained with erythromycin and rifampin, alone or in combination, were not statistically significantly different from those of the control or from each other.
Table 3 demonstrates the effect of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin at maximum attainable serum drug concentrations in the bactericidal human monocyte assay at pH 7.4 and 35°C. In the continued presence of antibiotics, on day 2 of the assay for levofloxacin and on day 3 for rifampin, decreases in CFU per milliliter of 3 logs or more were detected. This effect continued through day 4. In contrast, viable CFU-per-milliliter values for erythromycin were similar to those of controls on days 2 to 4. Following the removal of levofloxacin on day 1, the CFU-per-milliliter values increased on days 2 through 4 (P < 0.01). Following the removal of rifampin on day 1, the CFU-per-milliliter value continued to decrease, but this decrease was less than in assays in which rifampin was not removed. Furthermore, in assays in which levofloxacin or rifampin was removed, the CFU per milliliter on day 4 remained lower than that for erythromycin. For erythromycin, the CFU-per-milliliter value remained the same regardless of whether the antibiotic was removed.
Table 4 depicts the effects of levofloxacin, rifampin, and erythromycin, alone or in combination, at ten times their MICs when determined at 35°C and pH 6.0 in the bactericidal human monocyte assay. Although the corrected log10 CFU-per-milliliter values were lower than those of the control (days 1 through 4; P < 0.01), there were no statistically significant differences in the antibacterial activities of the three antibiotics, or combinations thereof, at pH 6.0. Changing the pH value from 7.4 to 6.0 decreased the effectiveness of levofloxacin but did not alter the activity of rifampin or erythromycin (Tables 2 and 4). As demonstrated in Tables 1 to 4, the corrected log10 CFU-per-milliliter values for the controls were higher (P < 0.05) on days 2 to 4 when the pH was 6.0 (Table 4) than they were at pH 7.4 (Tables 1 to 3).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Entry of L. pneumophila into phagocytic cells is accomplished by coiling phagocytosis. L. pneumophila inhibits the capacity of the phagocytic cells to form a ribosome-lined replicative phagosome, to acidify the phagosome, and to allow phagosome-lysosome fusion (14). L. pneumophila is known to be resistant to the bactericidal effects of serum and to the killing effect of monocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and alveolar macrophages (13, 14). Even L. pneumophila that has been pretreated with antibiotics is capable of multiplication within human monocytes (21).
Treatment of infections caused by L. pneumophila is effective only when antimicrobial agents capable of intracellular activity are used (8, 9, 11, 14, 17). Therapeutic failure is not related to the development of resistance but rather is due to the inability of the phagocytic cell to eliminate the organism from its intracellular environment or to a decreased cell-mediated immune response caused by the organism (2, 6, 13, 14, 26).
A good correlation between the intracellular penetration of specific antibiotics and the survival of patients with Legionnaires' disease has been found (8, 11, 15, 17). For many years, erythromycin has been the antimicrobial agent of choice for the treatment of Legionnaires' disease (8). More recently, the activities of fluoroquinolones and newer macrolides against L. pneumophila have been studied in vitro and in systems including macrophages (1, 3-5, 8, 9, 12, 19-22, 25). Our previously reported and present data support the effectiveness of levofloxacin against L. pneumophila (1, 21). In our present comparative study with erythromycin and rifampin, we found levofloxacin to be the most effective drug against intracellular L. pneumophila. A statistically significant decrease in CFU per milliliter could be demonstrated with increasing concentrations of levofloxacin (at the MIC versus two and four times the MIC), but not with rifampin or erythromycin (P < 0.05). Similarly, at 10 times the MIC, levofloxacin was most active singly or in combination with rifampin or erythromycin compared with erythromycin or rifampin alone or in combination (P < 0.01). Furthermore, when the maximum drug concentrations attainable in serum were compared, levofloxacin continued to be the most active drug (P < 0.01) for the entire assay time (4 days). Removal of levofloxacin or rifampin from the human monocyte system on day 1 was associated with regrowth of the organism on days 2 through 4, but the CFU-per-milliliter values continued to remain lower than those for erythromycin. This observation suggests that even with a falling intracellular levofloxacin concentration after removal of the drug from the surroundings, the continued suppression of L. pneumophila L-1033 growth was greater than that observed with erythromycin. For erythromycin, the percent viable count remained the same regardless of whether the antibiotic was removed. These observations were best demonstrated at pH 7.4. By the trypan blue exclusion test, it was determined that >90% of the adherent monocytes survived at pH 6 during the 4 days of the assay. Recently, we have demonstrated that levofloxacin is concentrated in adherent monocytes and that its concentrations at pH 7.4 and 6 are similar (20). The reason why the activities of all three antibiotics studied were similar at pH 6 requires further study.
As noted in a recent review of antimicrobial therapy for Legionnaires' disease, small numbers of patients have been successfully treated with fluoroquinolones, including ofloxacin, pefloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (8). Although rifampin is frequently used concomitantly with erythromycin or fluoroquinolones, to date there is no published clinical evidence that such combinations are more effective than single-drug therapy. Our study failed to demonstrate better intracellular killing when rifampin was used in combination with either levofloxacin or erythromycin. Furthermore, combinations of levofloxacin and either erythromycin or rifampin were no better than levofloxacin alone in our intracellular human monocyte system.
In conclusion, our previous in vitro studies and the present intracellular bactericidal data obtained in studies utilizing the human monocyte system demonstrate that levofloxacin is a considerably more active antimicrobial agent than erythromycin or rifampin against L. pneumophila. Its use for treatment of patients with Legionnaires' disease should be considered.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by the R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute and, in part, by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
We thank Judy Dean and Stephanie Brennan for excellent secretarial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Diseases (111D), Stratton VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Ave., Albany, NY 12208. Phone: (518) 462-3311, ext. 3080. Fax: (518) 462-3350. E-mail: baltch,aldona{at}albany.va.gov.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Baltch, A. L., R. P. Smith, and W. Ritz. 1995. Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of levofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, and rifampin used singly and in combination against Legionella pneumophila. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1661-1666[Abstract]. |
| 1a. | Baltch, A. L., R. P. Smith, M. Franke, and P. Michelsen. 1996. Antibacterial effect of levofloxacin (Lev), erythromycin (Ery) & rifampin (Rif) in a human monocyte (HM) system against Legionella pneumophila (L.pn.), abstr. E67, p. 93. In Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 2. |
Barker, J., and M. R. W. Brown.
1995.
Speculations on the influence of infecting phenotype on virulence and antibiotic susceptibility of Legionella pneumophila.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
36:7-21 |
| 3. |
Barker, J. E., and I. D. Farrell.
1990.
The effects of single and combined antibiotics on the growth of Legionella pneumophila using time-kill studies.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
26:45-53 |
| 4. | Dubois, J., and J. R. Joly. 1989. In vitro activity of lomefloxacin (SC47111 or NY-198) against isolates of Legionella spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12:89S-91S[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Edelstein, P. H.,
M. A. C. Edelstein,
J. Weidenfeld, and M. B. Dorr.
1990.
In vitro activity of sparfloxacin (CI-978; AT-4140) for clinical Legionella isolates, pharmacokinetics in guinea pigs, and use to treat guinea pigs with L. pneumophila pneumonia.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:2122-2127 |
| 6. |
Edelstein, P. H.
1991.
Rifampin resistance of Legionella pneumophila is not increased during therapy for experimental Legionnaires disease: study of rifampin resistance using a guinea pig model of Legionnaires disease.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:5-9 |
| 7. | Edelstein, P. H. 1993. Legionnaires' disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16:741-749[Medline]. |
| 8. | Edelstein, P. H. 1995. Antimicrobial therapy for Legionnaires' disease: a review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21(Suppl. 3):S8265-S8276. |
| 9. |
Edelstein, P. H.,
M. A. C. Edelstein,
K. H. Lehr, and J. Ren.
1996.
In vitro activity of levofloxacin against clinical isolates of Legionella spp., its pharmacokinetics in guinea pigs, and use in experimental Legionella pneumophila pneumonia.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:117-127 |
| 10. |
Fu, K. P.,
S. C. Lafredo,
B. Foleno,
D. M. Isaacson,
J. F. Barrett,
A. J. Tobia, and M. E. Rosenthale.
1992.
In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of levofloxacin (l-ofloxacin), an optically active ofloxacin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:860-866 |
| 11. | Gump, D. W., R. O. Frank, W. C. Foster, C. V. Broome, and W. B. Cherry. 1979. Legionnaires' disease in patients with associated serious disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 90:538-542. |
| 12. |
Havlichek, D.,
L. Saravolatz, and D. Pohlod.
1987.
Effect of quinolones and other antimicrobial agents on cell-associated Legionella pneumophila.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:1529-1534 |
| 13. | Horwitz, M. A. 1982. Phagocytosis of microorganisms. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4:104-123[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Horwitz, M. A.
1987.
Characterization of avirulent mutant Legionella pneumophila that survive but do not multiply within human monocytes.
J. Exp. Med.
166:1310-1328 |
| 15. | Kirby, B. D., K. M. Snyder, R. D. Meyer, and S. M. Finegold. 1980. Legionnaires' disease: report of 65 nosocomially acquired cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 59:188-205[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Liebers, D. M.,
A. L. Baltch,
R. P. Smith,
M. C. Hammer, and J. V. Conroy.
1989.
Susceptibility of Legionella pneumophila to eight antimicrobial agents including four macrolides under different assay conditions.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
23:37-41 |
| 17. | Morley, J. N., L. C. Smith, A. L. Baltch, and R. P. Smith. 1994. Recurrent infection due to Legionella pneumophila in a patient with AIDS. Clin. Infect. Dis. 19:1130-1132[Medline]. |
| 18. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1990. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. |
| 19. |
Reda, C.,
T. Quaresima, and M. C. Pastoris.
1994.
In vitro activity of six intracellular antibiotics against Legionella pneumophila strains of human and environmental origin.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
33:757-764 |
| 20. | Smith, R. P., A. L. Baltch, M. A. Franke, and W. Ritz. 1996. Levofloxacin (LOF) is concentrated in human monocytes (MN) and augments MN killing of cell associated (CA) Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), abstr. D-91, p. 258. In Abstracts of the 96th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1996. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 21. |
Smith, R. P.,
A. L. Baltch,
M. Franke,
W. Hioe,
W. Ritz, and P. Michelsen.
1997.
Effect of levofloxacin, erythromycin or rifampin pretreatment on growth of Legionella pneumophila in human monocytes.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:673-678 |
| 22. |
Stamler, D. A.,
M. A. C. Edelstein, and P. H. Edelstein.
1994.
Azithromycin pharmacokinetics and intracellular concentrations in Legionella pneumophila-infected and uninfected guinea pigs and their alveolar macrophages.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:217-222 |
| 23. | Stuart, A., and J. K. Ord. 1991. Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, vol. 2. , p. 1101-1153. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 24. | Takasuma, K., Y. Kasai, C. Usui, M. Takahashi, M. Hirohashi, K. Tamura, and S. Takayama. 1992. General pharmacology of the new quinolone antibacterial agent levofloxacin. Drug Res. 42:408-418. |
| 25. |
Vildé, J. L.,
E. Dournon, and P. Rajagopalan.
1986.
Inhibition of Legionella pneumophila multiplication within human macrophages by antimicrobial agents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
30:743-748 |
| 26. | Yourtee, E. L., and R. K. Root. 1984. Effects of antibiotics on phagocyte-microbe interaction, p. 243-275. In R. K. Root, and M. A. Sande (ed.), New dimensions in antimicrobial therapy. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»