This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3313-3314, Vol. 42, No. 12
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Macrolide Susceptibility and beta -Lactamase Production among Haemophilus influenzae Isolates in the United States, 1996-1997

Patricia A. Hogan* and Daniel J. Sheehan

U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, Pfizer Inc., New York, New York 10017

Received 23 April 1998/Returned for modification 10 August 1998/Accepted 10 September 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

In 1996 and 1997, 68 hospital laboratories throughout the United States determined the beta -lactamase production and susceptibility to macrolides of 1,998 isolates of Haemophilus influenzae obtained from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. The MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited of azithromycin, erythromycin, and clarithromycin were 4, 8, and 16 µg/ml, respectively. By National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards interpretive criteria, 99 and 78% of the isolates were susceptible to azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. The prevalence of beta -lactamase production was 32%.

    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Haemophilus influenzae is one of several causes of otitis media, sinusitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and pneumonia. These diseases often are treated empirically with oral antibiotics, and the results of national surveillance studies of antibiotic susceptibility provide a basis for rational therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of beta -lactamase production and the macrolide susceptibility of recent isolates of H. influenzae in the United States.

(This work was presented in part at the Fourth International Conference on the Macrolides, Azalides, Streptogramins and Ketolides, 21 to 23 January 1998, Barcelona, Spain.)

Methods. The MICs of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin against consecutive clinical isolates of H. influenzae recovered from the sputum of patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections were determined by 68 hospital laboratories between 1 March 1996 and 31 July 1997. All determinations were performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines (5) by the broth dilution method using microtiter trays prepared for the study by PML Microbiologicals (Tualatin, Oreg.). Susceptibility was evaluated on the basis of NCCLS interpretive breakpoints (no breakpoint has been established for erythromycin) (6). beta -Lactamase production was determined by a nitrocefin-based filter paper spot test.

Results and discussion. The in vitro activities of the study antibiotics are presented in Table 1. On the basis of weight, azithromycin was more active than erythromycin, and both were more active than clarithromycin. Comparison of the data in Tables 1 and 2 suggests that the in vitro activities of azithromycin and clarithromycin have not changed significantly since they became commercially available in 1992 and 1991, respectively.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   In vitro activities (MICs)a of macrolides against isolates of H. influenzae, 1996-1997

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Published in vitro activities (MICs)a of azithromycin and clarithromycin against isolates of H. influenzae

There was little variation by region in the percentages of susceptibility to either antibiotic (Table 3), and in all regions, a greater proportion of the H. influenzae isolates was susceptible to azithromycin than to clarithromycin. Our results are similar to those of Doern and associates (2), who found the susceptibilities to azithromycin and clarithromycin of 1,537 isolates of H. influenzae at 30 centers in 1994 and 1995 to be >99.5 and 71%, respectively. The difference in susceptibility of H. influenzae to the two antibiotics is possibly attributable to the presence of an extra positive charge on the azithromycin molecule, which has been reported to enhance its ability to penetrate the gram-negative bacterial cell wall (3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Susceptibility to azithromycin and clarithromycin of isolates of H. influenzae, 1996-1997

Overall, 32% of the H. influenzae isolates produced beta -lactamase, a prevalence similar to that observed by Doern and colleagues in their 1994 and 1995 isolates (34.6%) (2). In our study, there was little geographic variation in the prevalence of beta -lactamase production. In the East (28 hospitals, 835 isolates), 36% of isolates were beta -lactamase positive (median, 35%; range, 13-66%). In the Midwest (26 hospitals, 757 isolates), 31% of isolates were beta -lactamase positive (median, 30%; range, 7-50%). In the West (14 hospitals; 406 isolates), 29% of isolates were beta -lactamase positive (median, 29%; range 7-57%).

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Falk Communications and all the participating clinical laboratories for their contribution to the study.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY 10017. Phone: (212) 573-3923. Fax: (212) 573-5916. E-mail: hoganp{at}pfizer.com.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, P. C. Fuchs, and R. R. Packer. 1994. In vitro activities of 12 orally administered antimicrobial agents against four species of bacterial respiratory pathogens from U.S. medical centers in 1992 and 1993. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2419-2425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Doern, G. V., A. B. Brueggemann, G. Pierce, H. P. Holley, Jr., and A. Rauch. 1997. Antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae in the United States in 1994 and 1995 and detection of beta -lactamase-positive strains resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate: results of a national multicenter surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:292-297[Abstract].
3. Farmer, S., Z. Li, and R. E. W. Hancock. 1992. Influence of outer membrane mutations on susceptibility of Escherichia coli to the dibasic macrolide azithromycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 29:27-33[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Fung-Tomc, J. C., E. Huczko, T. Stickle, B. Minassian, B. Kolek, K. Denbleyker, D. Bonner, and R. Kessler. 1995. Antibacterial activities of cefprozil compared with those of 13 oral cephems and 3 macrolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:533-538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1995. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Zone diameter interpretive standards and equivalent minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for Haemophilus spp. Approved standard M100-S7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3313-3314, Vol. 42, No. 12
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L., Brown, S. D. (2001). Influence of Variations in Test Methods on Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to Ampicillin, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, and Telithromycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 43-46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thornsberry, C., Jones, M. E., Hickey, M. L., Mauriz, Y., Kahn, J., Sahm, D. F. (1999). Resistance surveillance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolated in the United States, 1997-1998. J Antimicrob Chemother 44: 749-759 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thornsberry, C., Ogilvie, P. T., Holley, H. P. Jr., Sahm, D. F. (1999). Survey of Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis Isolates to 26 Antimicrobial Agents: a Prospective U.S. Study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 2612-2623 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. J.