Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3320-3324, Vol. 42, No. 12
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public
Health, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
Received 9 April 1998/Returned for modification 26 July
1998/Accepted 4 October 1998
Four peptides, cecropin P1, magainin II, indolicidin, and
ranalexin, were evaluated against 202 clinical isolates of
gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic bacteria by a microbroth
dilution method. The gram-negative isolates were more susceptible to
cecropin P1. Ranalexin was the most active compound against the
gram-positive strains. The bactericidal activity of each peptide was
equivalent to, or 1 dilution above, the MIC. In conclusion, the four
peptides exhibited different in vitro activities and rapid
time-dependent killing.
In the last few years many cationic
peptides have been isolated from a wide range of animal, plant, and
bacterial species (1-6, 9-12, 15, 19). These compounds
comprise a diverse class of molecules used in host defense by plants,
insects, fish, crustaceans, amphibians, birds, mammals, and humans.
These peptides, because of their small sizes (11 to 39 amino acids) and
antimicrobial potencies, may have therapeutic potential in the
treatment of infections in humans. In mammals, including humans, they
are the predominant protein species in the neutrophil; they are found on the surfaces of the tongue, trachea, lungs, and upper intestine; and
they are thought to be major factors in antibacterial defense on
mucosal surfaces (10).
It has been suggested that the modes of action of these compounds on
the membranes of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and artificial lipid
bilayers may be similar and that they may involve the formation of ion
channel pores that span membranes without requiring a specific target
receptor (18). Recent reports demonstrated that the site for
the antibacterial action of the peptides is the cytoplasmic membrane
(13, 16). Therefore, these compounds must initially be able
to cross or disintegrate the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria.
The lethal event which occurs at the cytoplasmic membrane is not fully
understood. It has been shown that the peptides cause channel formation
in the cytoplasmic membrane, resulting in cell death (9). In
this study we investigated the in vitro activities of four
membrane-active peptides against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria that grow aerobically. The peptides evaluated belonged to
different groups of molecules: magainin II, a basic peptide; cecropin
P1, a peptide with two A total of 202 nonduplicate, clinical isolates were tested and
consisted of methicillin-resistant (MR) Staphylococcus
aureus (15 strains), methicillin-susceptible (MS) S. aureus (15 strains), MR Staphylococcus hominis (5 strains), MS S. hominis (5 strains), MS Staphylococcus
epidermidis (5 strains), MR S. epidermidis (5 strains), MS Staphylococcus saprophyticus (5 strains),
MR S. saprophyticus (5 strains), MS
Staphylococcus haemolyticus (2 strains), Streptococcus pneumoniae (10 strains), Streptococcus sanguis (5 strains), Gemella morbillorum (5 strains), Lactococcus
cremoris (2 strains), Lactococcus lactis (2 strains),
Enterococcus faecalis (5 strains), Rhodococcus equi (5 strains), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20 strains),
Pseudomonas cepacia (5 strains), Pseudomonas
fluorescens (5 strains), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
(5 strains), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5 strains),
Enterobacter cloacae (5 strains), Serratia
marcescens (5 strains), Salmonella typhi (5 strains),
Salmonella paratyphi A (2 strains), Salmonella typhimurium (5 strains), Salmonella choleraesuis (2 strains), Salmonella arizonae (5 strains), Proteus
mirabilis (5 strains), Escherichia coli (10 strains), Shigella flexneri (2 strains), Shigella sonnei (2 strains), Yersinia
enterocolitica (3 strains), Acinetobacter species
(5 strains), and Brucella species (5 strains).
Cecropin P1, magainin II, indolicidin, and ranalexin were obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l. (Milan, Italy). The peptides were solubilized in
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2), yielding 1,000 mg per liter of
stock solution. Solutions of drugs were made fresh on the day of assay
or stored at
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Activities of Membrane-Active Peptides
against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-helices joined by regions containing glycine
and proline; indolicidin, a tryptophan-rich peptide; and ranalexin, a
polymyxin-related peptide (7, 17).
80°C in the dark for short periods. The MIC of each
peptide was determined by a microbroth dilution method with
Mueller-Hinton broth (Becton Dickinson Italia, Milan, Italy) and an
initial inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/ml, according to the
procedures outlined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards (14). For streptococci and enterococci the medium
was supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood. Polystyrene 96-well plates
(Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, N.J.) were incubated for
18 h at 37°C in air, and since several peptides have a tendency
to precipitate, plates were shaken throughout the study. The MIC was
considered the lowest peptide concentration at which observable growth
was inhibited. The MBC was considered the lowest concentration of each
peptide that resulted in a more than 99.9% reduction of the initial
inoculum. Peptide concentrations required to inhibit 50 and 90% of the
strains and those required to kill 50 and 90% of the strains, as well
as the ranges of the MICs of each peptide, are listed in Tables
1 and 2.
TABLE 1.
MICs and MBCs of lytic peptides for
gram-negative bacteria
TABLE 2.
MICs and MBCs of lytic peptides for
gram-positive bacteria
S. aureus ATCC 25923 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were grown at 37°C in Mueller-Hinton broth. Aliquots of exponentially growing bacteria were resuspended in fresh Mueller-Hinton broth at approximately 107 cells/ml and exposed to each peptide (final concentration, 32 µg/ml) for 0, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min at 37°C. After these times, samples were serially diluted and plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates to obtain viable colonies. Killing by ranalexin was shown to be the most rapid against S. aureus ATCC 25923 (Fig. 1a): its activity was complete after a 30-min exposure period. Killing by cecropin P1 was shown to be the most rapid against E. coli ATCC 25922 (Fig. 1b): its activity was also complete after a 30-min exposure period.
|
Membrane-active peptides are known to have variable antibacterial, antifungal, and antiprotozoan in vitro activities. These compounds provide a host defense system to combat infections. In the present study we evaluated the activities of four structurally different peptides against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria that grow aerobically. The comparative in vitro activities of cecropin P1, magainin II, indolicidin, and ranalexin against gram-negative aerobic species are shown in Table 1. Overall, the peptides had different ranges of inhibitory values for most species. All the strains were more susceptible to cecropin P1 than to ranalexin. The peptides were effective against all the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae except Proteus mirabilis. They were scarcely effective against the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, P. cepacia, P. fluorescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. On the other hand, with the exception of ranalexin, they showed activity against Acinetobacter species and Brucella species.
Ranalexin was the most active compound against the gram-positive
clinical isolates. It inhibited MS S. aureus strains at
concentrations of 1 to 32 µg/ml and MR S. aureus strains
at concentrations of 2 to 32 µg/ml. It showed similar activities
against MS and MR strains of S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. saprophyticus, and S. haemolyticus. Overall, the activities of cecropin P1, magainin II,
and indolicidin against coagulase-negative MS staphylococci were
similar to their activities against MS S. aureus strains and
lower than those of ranalexin (Table 2). Cecropin P1, magainin II, and
indolicidin also inhibited Streptococcus species,
Gemella species, and Lactococcus species, but
they were less active than ranalexin. The least sensitive of the
gram-positive group of bacteria to the four peptides was
Enterococcus faecalis; ranalexin and indolicidin at
concentrations of 16 to 128 and 32 to 128 µg/ml, respectively,
inhibited the five isolates of Enterococcus faecalis which
were resistant to cecropin P1 and magainin II at concentrations of
128 µg/ml. All peptides showed activities against R. equi similar to those exerted against MR S. aureus.
Our data show that the bactericidal activities of each peptide against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria were equivalent to, or 1 dilution above, their MICs, with the exception of those against R. equi: the MBCs for R. equi were fourfold higher than the MICs. There are few data on the concentration- or time-dependent killing kinetics of bacteria by membrane-active peptides; nevertheless, our observations are in agreement with recent reports which showed that killing by peptides was very rapid and resulted in log orders of cell death within minutes of peptide addition (9, 10, 13). In conclusion, the four peptides showed different activities against gram-positive and gram-negative organisms in vitro and exhibited rapid time-dependent killing of the two control strains.
The membrane-active peptides are interesting compounds: their antibacterial activities make these agents potentially valuable as adjuvants in antimicrobial chemotherapy. Furthermore, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem in human medicine. Although many molecules have been subjected to chemical manipulation to yield novel derivatives with extended activities and increased resistance to enzymatic inactivation, antibiotic-resistant mutants have usually emerged quickly. The membrane-active peptides represent a conserved theme in host antimicrobial defenses throughout nature; they are potentially the first new structural class of antimicrobial agents in 3 decades. This study has shown that this group of peptides possesses a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity; nevertheless, further studies are needed to elucidate their in vivo efficacies and toxicities and their utility in clinical practice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I, Piazza Cappelli, 1, 60121 Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 71 5963467. Fax: 39 71 5963468. E-mail: cmalinf{at}popcsi.unian.it.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Aley, S. B.,
M. Zimmerman,
M. Hetsko,
M. E. Selsted, and F. D. Gillin.
1994.
Killing of Giardia lamblia by cryptdins and cationic neutrophil peptides.
Infect. Immun.
62:5397-5403 |
| 2. | Andreu, D., R. B. Merrifield, H. Steiner, and H. G. Boman. 1985. N-terminal analogues of cecropin A: synthesis, antibacterial activity and conformational properties. Biochemistry 24:1683-1688[Medline]. |
| 3. | Bevins, C. L., and M. Zasloff. 1990. Peptides from frog skin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:395-414[Medline]. |
| 4. | Blondelle, S. E., and R. A. Houghton. 1991. Hemolytic and antimicrobial activities in the twenty-four individual omission analogues of mellitin. Biochemistry 30:4671-4678[Medline]. |
| 5. | Boman, H.G, and D. Hultmark. 1987. Cell-free immunity in insects. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41:103-126[Medline]. |
| 6. | Cannon, M. 1987. A family of wound healers. Nature 328:478[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Clark, D. P.,
S. Durell,
W. L. Maloy, and M. Zasloff.
1994.
Ranalexin: a novel antimicrobial peptide from bullfrog (Rana catasbeiana) skin, structurally related to the bacterial antibiotic polymyxin.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:10849-10855 |
| 8. | DeLucca, A. J., J. M. Blond, T. J. Jacks, C. Grimm, T. E. Cleveland, and T. J. Walsh. 1997. Fungicidal activity of cecropin A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:481-483[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Falla, T. J., and R. E. W. Hancock. 1997. Improved activity of a synthetic indolicidin analog. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:771-775[Abstract]. |
| 10. |
Hancock, R. E. W.
1997.
Antibacterial peptides and the outer membranes of gram-negative bacilli.
J. Med. Microbiol.
46:1-3 |
| 11. |
Lee, J. Y.,
A. Boman,
S. Chuanxin,
M. Andersson,
H. Jörnall,
V. Mutt, and H. G. Boman.
1989.
Antimicrobial peptides from pig intestine: isolation of a mammalian cecropin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:9159-9162 |
| 12. | Lehrer, R. I., A. Barton, K. A. Daher, S. S. L. Harwig, T. Ganz, and M. E. Selsted. 1989. Interaction of human defensins with Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Investig. 84:553-561. |
| 13. |
Moore, A. J.,
W. D. Beazley,
M. C. Bibby, and D. A. Devine.
1996.
Antimicrobial activity of cecropins.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:1077-1089 |
| 14. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1993. Approved standard M7-A3. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. |
| 15. |
Sawyer, J. G.,
N. L. Martin, and R. E. W. Hancock.
1988.
The interaction of macrophage cationic proteins with the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Infect. Immun.
56:693-698 |
| 16. | Vaara, M., and M. Porro. 1996. Group of peptides that act synergistically with hydrophobic antibiotics against gram-negative enteric bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1801-1805[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Viljanen, P., H. Matsunaga, Y. Kimura, and M. Vaara. 1991. The outer membrane permeability-increasing action of deacylpolymyxins. J. Antibiot. 44:517-523[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Wade, D.,
A. Boman,
B. Wåhlin,
C. M. Drain,
D. Andreu,
H. G. Boman, and R. B. Merrifield.
1990.
All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic peptides.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:4761-4765 |
| 19. |
Zasloff, M.
1987.
Magainins, a class of antimicrobial peptides from Xenopus skin: isolation, characterization of two active forms, and partial cDNA sequence of a precursor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:5449-5453 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»