This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3320-3324, Vol. 42, No. 12
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Membrane-Active Peptides against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria

A. Giacometti,* O. Cirioni, G. Greganti, M. Quarta, and G. Scalise

Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy

Received 9 April 1998/Returned for modification 26 July 1998/Accepted 4 October 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Four peptides, cecropin P1, magainin II, indolicidin, and ranalexin, were evaluated against 202 clinical isolates of gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic bacteria by a microbroth dilution method. The gram-negative isolates were more susceptible to cecropin P1. Ranalexin was the most active compound against the gram-positive strains. The bactericidal activity of each peptide was equivalent to, or 1 dilution above, the MIC. In conclusion, the four peptides exhibited different in vitro activities and rapid time-dependent killing.

    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

In the last few years many cationic peptides have been isolated from a wide range of animal, plant, and bacterial species (1-6, 9-12, 15, 19). These compounds comprise a diverse class of molecules used in host defense by plants, insects, fish, crustaceans, amphibians, birds, mammals, and humans. These peptides, because of their small sizes (11 to 39 amino acids) and antimicrobial potencies, may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of infections in humans. In mammals, including humans, they are the predominant protein species in the neutrophil; they are found on the surfaces of the tongue, trachea, lungs, and upper intestine; and they are thought to be major factors in antibacterial defense on mucosal surfaces (10).

It has been suggested that the modes of action of these compounds on the membranes of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and artificial lipid bilayers may be similar and that they may involve the formation of ion channel pores that span membranes without requiring a specific target receptor (18). Recent reports demonstrated that the site for the antibacterial action of the peptides is the cytoplasmic membrane (13, 16). Therefore, these compounds must initially be able to cross or disintegrate the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria. The lethal event which occurs at the cytoplasmic membrane is not fully understood. It has been shown that the peptides cause channel formation in the cytoplasmic membrane, resulting in cell death (9). In this study we investigated the in vitro activities of four membrane-active peptides against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria that grow aerobically. The peptides evaluated belonged to different groups of molecules: magainin II, a basic peptide; cecropin P1, a peptide with two alpha -helices joined by regions containing glycine and proline; indolicidin, a tryptophan-rich peptide; and ranalexin, a polymyxin-related peptide (7, 17).

A total of 202 nonduplicate, clinical isolates were tested and consisted of methicillin-resistant (MR) Staphylococcus aureus (15 strains), methicillin-susceptible (MS) S. aureus (15 strains), MR Staphylococcus hominis (5 strains), MS S. hominis (5 strains), MS Staphylococcus epidermidis (5 strains), MR S. epidermidis (5 strains), MS Staphylococcus saprophyticus (5 strains), MR S. saprophyticus (5 strains), MS Staphylococcus haemolyticus (2 strains), Streptococcus pneumoniae (10 strains), Streptococcus sanguis (5 strains), Gemella morbillorum (5 strains), Lactococcus cremoris (2 strains), Lactococcus lactis (2 strains), Enterococcus faecalis (5 strains), Rhodococcus equi (5 strains), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20 strains), Pseudomonas cepacia (5 strains), Pseudomonas fluorescens (5 strains), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5 strains), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5 strains), Enterobacter cloacae (5 strains), Serratia marcescens (5 strains), Salmonella typhi (5 strains), Salmonella paratyphi A (2 strains), Salmonella typhimurium (5 strains), Salmonella choleraesuis (2 strains), Salmonella arizonae (5 strains), Proteus mirabilis (5 strains), Escherichia coli (10 strains), Shigella flexneri (2 strains), Shigella sonnei (2 strains), Yersinia enterocolitica (3 strains), Acinetobacter species (5 strains), and Brucella species (5 strains).

Cecropin P1, magainin II, indolicidin, and ranalexin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l. (Milan, Italy). The peptides were solubilized in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2), yielding 1,000 mg per liter of stock solution. Solutions of drugs were made fresh on the day of assay or stored at -80°C in the dark for short periods. The MIC of each peptide was determined by a microbroth dilution method with Mueller-Hinton broth (Becton Dickinson Italia, Milan, Italy) and an initial inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/ml, according to the procedures outlined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (14). For streptococci and enterococci the medium was supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood. Polystyrene 96-well plates (Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, N.J.) were incubated for 18 h at 37°C in air, and since several peptides have a tendency to precipitate, plates were shaken throughout the study. The MIC was considered the lowest peptide concentration at which observable growth was inhibited. The MBC was considered the lowest concentration of each peptide that resulted in a more than 99.9% reduction of the initial inoculum. Peptide concentrations required to inhibit 50 and 90% of the strains and those required to kill 50 and 90% of the strains, as well as the ranges of the MICs of each peptide, are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   MICs and MBCs of lytic peptides for gram-negative bacteria

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   MICs and MBCs of lytic peptides for gram-positive bacteria

S. aureus ATCC 25923 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were grown at 37°C in Mueller-Hinton broth. Aliquots of exponentially growing bacteria were resuspended in fresh Mueller-Hinton broth at approximately 107 cells/ml and exposed to each peptide (final concentration, 32 µg/ml) for 0, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min at 37°C. After these times, samples were serially diluted and plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates to obtain viable colonies. Killing by ranalexin was shown to be the most rapid against S. aureus ATCC 25923 (Fig. 1a): its activity was complete after a 30-min exposure period. Killing by cecropin P1 was shown to be the most rapid against E. coli ATCC 25922 (Fig. 1b): its activity was also complete after a 30-min exposure period.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Time-kill kinetics of membrane-active peptides against S. aureus ATCC 25923 (a) and E. coli ATCC 25922 (b). Peptides were tested at a concentration of 32 µg/ml.

Membrane-active peptides are known to have variable antibacterial, antifungal, and antiprotozoan in vitro activities. These compounds provide a host defense system to combat infections. In the present study we evaluated the activities of four structurally different peptides against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria that grow aerobically. The comparative in vitro activities of cecropin P1, magainin II, indolicidin, and ranalexin against gram-negative aerobic species are shown in Table 1. Overall, the peptides had different ranges of inhibitory values for most species. All the strains were more susceptible to cecropin P1 than to ranalexin. The peptides were effective against all the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae except Proteus mirabilis. They were scarcely effective against the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, P. cepacia, P. fluorescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. On the other hand, with the exception of ranalexin, they showed activity against Acinetobacter species and Brucella species.

Ranalexin was the most active compound against the gram-positive clinical isolates. It inhibited MS S. aureus strains at concentrations of 1 to 32 µg/ml and MR S. aureus strains at concentrations of 2 to 32 µg/ml. It showed similar activities against MS and MR strains of S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. saprophyticus, and S. haemolyticus. Overall, the activities of cecropin P1, magainin II, and indolicidin against coagulase-negative MS staphylococci were similar to their activities against MS S. aureus strains and lower than those of ranalexin (Table 2). Cecropin P1, magainin II, and indolicidin also inhibited Streptococcus species, Gemella species, and Lactococcus species, but they were less active than ranalexin. The least sensitive of the gram-positive group of bacteria to the four peptides was Enterococcus faecalis; ranalexin and indolicidin at concentrations of 16 to 128 and 32 to 128 µg/ml, respectively, inhibited the five isolates of Enterococcus faecalis which were resistant to cecropin P1 and magainin II at concentrations of >= 128 µg/ml. All peptides showed activities against R. equi similar to those exerted against MR S. aureus.

Our data show that the bactericidal activities of each peptide against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria were equivalent to, or 1 dilution above, their MICs, with the exception of those against R. equi: the MBCs for R. equi were fourfold higher than the MICs. There are few data on the concentration- or time-dependent killing kinetics of bacteria by membrane-active peptides; nevertheless, our observations are in agreement with recent reports which showed that killing by peptides was very rapid and resulted in log orders of cell death within minutes of peptide addition (9, 10, 13). In conclusion, the four peptides showed different activities against gram-positive and gram-negative organisms in vitro and exhibited rapid time-dependent killing of the two control strains.

The membrane-active peptides are interesting compounds: their antibacterial activities make these agents potentially valuable as adjuvants in antimicrobial chemotherapy. Furthermore, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem in human medicine. Although many molecules have been subjected to chemical manipulation to yield novel derivatives with extended activities and increased resistance to enzymatic inactivation, antibiotic-resistant mutants have usually emerged quickly. The membrane-active peptides represent a conserved theme in host antimicrobial defenses throughout nature; they are potentially the first new structural class of antimicrobial agents in 3 decades. This study has shown that this group of peptides possesses a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity; nevertheless, further studies are needed to elucidate their in vivo efficacies and toxicities and their utility in clinical practice.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I, Piazza Cappelli, 1, 60121 Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 71 5963467. Fax: 39 71 5963468. E-mail: cmalinf{at}popcsi.unian.it.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Aley, S. B., M. Zimmerman, M. Hetsko, M. E. Selsted, and F. D. Gillin. 1994. Killing of Giardia lamblia by cryptdins and cationic neutrophil peptides. Infect. Immun. 62:5397-5403[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Andreu, D., R. B. Merrifield, H. Steiner, and H. G. Boman. 1985. N-terminal analogues of cecropin A: synthesis, antibacterial activity and conformational properties. Biochemistry 24:1683-1688[Medline].
3. Bevins, C. L., and M. Zasloff. 1990. Peptides from frog skin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:395-414[Medline].
4. Blondelle, S. E., and R. A. Houghton. 1991. Hemolytic and antimicrobial activities in the twenty-four individual omission analogues of mellitin. Biochemistry 30:4671-4678[Medline].
5. Boman, H.G, and D. Hultmark. 1987. Cell-free immunity in insects. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41:103-126[Medline].
6. Cannon, M. 1987. A family of wound healers. Nature 328:478[Medline].
7. Clark, D. P., S. Durell, W. L. Maloy, and M. Zasloff. 1994. Ranalexin: a novel antimicrobial peptide from bullfrog (Rana catasbeiana) skin, structurally related to the bacterial antibiotic polymyxin. J. Biol. Chem. 269:10849-10855[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. DeLucca, A. J., J. M. Blond, T. J. Jacks, C. Grimm, T. E. Cleveland, and T. J. Walsh. 1997. Fungicidal activity of cecropin A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:481-483[Abstract].
9. Falla, T. J., and R. E. W. Hancock. 1997. Improved activity of a synthetic indolicidin analog. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:771-775[Abstract].
10. Hancock, R. E. W. 1997. Antibacterial peptides and the outer membranes of gram-negative bacilli. J. Med. Microbiol. 46:1-3[Free Full Text].
11. Lee, J. Y., A. Boman, S. Chuanxin, M. Andersson, H. Jörnall, V. Mutt, and H. G. Boman. 1989. Antimicrobial peptides from pig intestine: isolation of a mammalian cecropin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9159-9162[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Lehrer, R. I., A. Barton, K. A. Daher, S. S. L. Harwig, T. Ganz, and M. E. Selsted. 1989. Interaction of human defensins with Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Investig. 84:553-561.
13. Moore, A. J., W. D. Beazley, M. C. Bibby, and D. A. Devine. 1996. Antimicrobial activity of cecropins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:1077-1089[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1993. Approved standard M7-A3. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
15. Sawyer, J. G., N. L. Martin, and R. E. W. Hancock. 1988. The interaction of macrophage cationic proteins with the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 56:693-698[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Vaara, M., and M. Porro. 1996. Group of peptides that act synergistically with hydrophobic antibiotics against gram-negative enteric bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1801-1805[Abstract].
17. Viljanen, P., H. Matsunaga, Y. Kimura, and M. Vaara. 1991. The outer membrane permeability-increasing action of deacylpolymyxins. J. Antibiot. 44:517-523[Medline].
18. Wade, D., A. Boman, B. Wåhlin, C. M. Drain, D. Andreu, H. G. Boman, and R. B. Merrifield. 1990. All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4761-4765[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Zasloff, M. 1987. Magainins, a class of antimicrobial peptides from Xenopus skin: isolation, characterization of two active forms, and partial cDNA sequence of a precursor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:5449-5453[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 1998, p. 3320-3324, Vol. 42, No. 12
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bucki, R., Byfield, F. J., Kulakowska, A., McCormick, M. E., Drozdowski, W., Namiot, Z., Hartung, T., Janmey, P. A. (2008). Extracellular Gelsolin Binds Lipoteichoic Acid and Modulates Cellular Response to Proinflammatory Bacterial Wall Components. J. Immunol. 181: 4936-4944 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bucki, R., Namiot, D. B., Namiot, Z., Savage, P. B., Janmey, P. A. (2008). Salivary mucins inhibit antibacterial activity of the cathelicidin-derived LL-37 peptide but not the cationic steroid CSA-13. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 329-335 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ghiselli, R., Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Mocchegiani, F., Silvestri, C., Orlando, F., Kamysz, W., Licci, A., Nadolski, P., Della Vittoria, A., Lukasiak, J., Scalise, G., Saba, V. (2007). Pretreatment With the Protegrin IB-367 Affects Gram-Positive Biofilm and Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Linezolid in Animal Models of Central Venous Catheter Infection. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 31: 463-468 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bucki, R., Sostarecz, A. G., Byfield, F. J., Savage, P. B., Janmey, P. A. (2007). Resistance of the antibacterial agent ceragenin CSA-13 to inactivation by DNA or F-actin and its activity in cystic fibrosis sputum. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 535-545 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bucki, R., Janmey, P. A. (2006). Interaction of the Gelsolin-Derived Antibacterial PBP 10 Peptide with Lipid Bilayers and Cell Membranes.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 2932-2940 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Ghiselli, R., Mocchegiani, F., D'Amato, G., Circo, R., Orlando, F., Skerlavaj, B., Silvestri, C., Saba, V., Zanetti, M., Scalise, G. (2004). Cathelicidin Peptide Sheep Myeloid Antimicrobial Peptide-29 Prevents Endotoxin-induced Mortality in Rat Models of Septic Shock. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 169: 187-194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ballweber, L. M., Jaynes, J. E., Stamm, W. E., Lampe, M. F. (2002). In Vitro Microbicidal Activities of Cecropin Peptides D2A21 and D4E1 and Gel Formulations Containing 0.1 to 2% D2A21 against Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 34-41 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cirioni, O., Giacometti, A., Ghiselli, R., Mocchegiani, F., Fineo, A., Orlando, F., Del Prete, M. S., Rocchi, M., Saba, V., Scalise, G. (2002). Single-Dose Intraperitoneal Magainins Improve Survival in a Gram-Negative-Pathogen Septic Shock Rat Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 101-104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Ghiselli, R., Goffi, L., Mocchegiani, F., Riva, A., Scalise, G., Saba, V. (2000). Efficacy of polycationic peptides in preventing vascular graft infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 751-756 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Barchiesi, F., Del Prete, M. S., Fortuna, M., Caselli, F., Scalise, G. (2000). In Vitro Susceptibility Tests for Cationic Peptides: Comparison of Broth Microdilution Methods for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 1694-1696 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Giacometti, A., Cirioni, O., Barchiesi, F., Fortuna, M., Scalise, G. (1999). In-vitro activity of cationic peptides alone and in combination with clinically used antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 44: 641-645 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacometti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.