This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bonner, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bonner, D. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 1998, p. 313-318, Vol. 42, No. 2
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activity of a New Oral Triazole, BMS-207147 (ER-30346)

Joan C. Fung-Tomc,* Elizabeth Huczko, Beatrice Minassian, and Daniel P. Bonner

Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492

Received 25 July 1997/Returned for modification 10 September 1997/Accepted 17 November 1997

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The antifungal activity of BMS-207147 (also known as ER-30346) was compared to those of itraconazole and fluconazole against 250 strains of fungi representing 44 fungal species. MICs were determined by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-recommended broth macrodilution method for yeasts, which was modified for filamentous fungi. BMS-207147 was about two- to fourfold more potent than itraconazole and about 40-fold more active than fluconazole against yeasts. With the NCCLS-recommended resistant MIC breakpoints of >= 1 µg/ml for itraconazole and of >= 64 µg/ml for fluconazole against Candida spp., itraconazole and fluconazole were inactive against strains of Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis. In contrast, all but 9 (all C. tropicalis) of the 116 Candida strains tested had BMS-207147 MICs of <1 µg/ml. The three triazoles were active against about half of the Candida glabrata strains and against all of the Cryptococcus neoformans strains tested. The three triazoles were fungistatic to most yeast species, except for BMS-207147 and itraconazole, which were fungicidal to cryptococci. BMS-207147 and itraconazole were inhibitory to most aspergilli, and against half of the isolates, the activity was cidal. BMS-207147 and itraconazole were active, though not cidal, against most hyaline Hyphomycetes (with the exception of Fusarium spp. and Pseudallescheria boydii), dermatophytes, and the dematiaceous fungi and inactive against Sporothrix schenckii and zygomycetes. Fluconazole, on the other hand, was inactive against most filamentous fungi with the exception of dermatophytes other than Microsporum gypseum. Thus, the spectrum and potency of BMS-207147 indicate that it should be a candidate for clinical development.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In the past two decades, the number of immunocompromised patients has increased significantly. Immunocompromised patients include patients with neoplasm on chemotherapy, organ transplant recipients on immunosuppressive therapy, and patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). More than 95% of HIV-infected individuals suffer from oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) (7). Since its introduction, fluconazole (FLU) has been used extensively for the treatment of OPC. Though Candida albicans remains the most prevalent fungal pathogen causing human disease, other Candida spp. (such as C. krusei, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata) have increased in frequency as causative agents of candidiasis. The increased isolation of C. krusei in patients on FLU therapy is likely due to its intrinsic resistance to FLU.

The only other triazole marketed for systemic fungal infections is itraconazole (ITR). Unlike FLU, the antifungal spectrum of ITR includes some strains of C. krusei, C. glabrata, Aspergillus spp., and other filamentous fungi. While both triazoles are generally fungistatic to yeasts, ITR is fungicidal to many strains of aspergilli. Nonetheless, aspergillosis infections treated with ITR fail in 20 to 40% of cases (1, 8).

The widespread use of triazoles in systemic fungal infections is due to their broad spectrum and improved safety profile compared to those of other marketed antifungal drugs. In this study, we report on the in vitro antifungal and fungicidal activities of the new triazole BMS-207147 (BMS). This triazole, also known as ER-30346, has been evaluated previously by Eisai Co. on 90 to 100 strains of yeasts and aspergilli using either SAAM-F (synthetic amino acid medium, fungal agar), SDA (Sabouraud dextrose agar) or the microbroth method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (4, 5). In the current study, 250 fungal strains representing 44 species were tested for their sensitivities to BMS, ITR, FLU, and amphotericin B (AMB) by the NCCLS-approved macrobroth susceptibility testing method for yeasts and modified for filamentous fungi.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Test organisms. A total of 250 strains from 44 fungal species were used in this study. Almost all (more than 95%) of the strains were clinical isolates; the rest were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md.).

Antifungal susceptibility test methods. All isolates (except Malassezia furfur) were tested by the reference broth macrodilution method outlined by the NCCLS (6) and modified for antifungal testing of filamentous fungi (2). BMS was obtained from Eisai Co., FLU was from Pfizer, ITR was from Janssen Pharmaceutica, and AMB was from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

The interpretative MIC breakpoints for FLU and ITR are obtained from the NCCLS guidelines (6); these breakpoints were meant as interpretative guidelines for Candida spp. The NCCLS-recommended breakpoints for FLU are as follows: <= 8 µg/ml, susceptible; 16 to 32 µg/ml, susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD); and >= 64 µg/ml, resistant. For ITR, the NCCLS-recommended MIC breakpoints as follows: <= 0.13 µg/ml, susceptible; 0.25 to 0.5 µg/ml, S-DD; and >= 1 µg/ml, resistant. At this point, no interpretative MIC breakpoints for BMS have been established. For the purpose of discussion of the MIC results in this report, we will use the ITR interpretative breakpoints for BMS, given that both compounds achieve the same peak levels in plasma in dogs (4). As for AMB, no interpretative MIC breakpoints have been recommended by the NCCLS, though Candida isolates with AMB MICs of >1 µg/ml appear resistant in animal models (8). Thus, AMB resistance will be defined in this study as AMB MICs of >= 2 µg/ml when the NCCLS RPMI 1640 method is used.

Broth macrodilution for yeasts was performed according to the guidelines of the NCCLS (6) and modified for filamentous fungi by the method of Espinel-Ingroff and Kerkering (2). The agar dilution method used for Malassezia furfur was described previously (3).

The MIC endpoints by the broth macrodilution method were determined as recommended by the NCCLS (6). AMB MICs were defined as the lowest drug concentrations which inhibited all visible growth (i.e., 100% inhibition). FLU, ITR, and BMS MICs were defined as the lowest drug concentrations which inhibited 80% of the growth in the growth control tube (as determined by comparison with a 1:5 dilution of the growth control), except with Malassezia furfur, where 100% growth inhibition was the endpoint.

MFCs. Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were determined by subculturing 0.1 ml from each tube with no visible growth in the MIC broth macrodilution series onto drug-free SDA plates, as previously described (3). Colony counts were determined, and the MFCs were defined in accordance with the level of decrease in the number of CFU per milliliter, i.e., MFC99 means a 99% reduction in the number of CFU of the final inoculum size per milliliter, MFC95 means a 95% reduction, and MFC90 means a 90% reduction.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Comparative in vitro antifungal spectra of BMS, ITR, and FLU. Of the 116 Candida strains tested, all but 9 strains of C. tropicalis were susceptible to BMS at MICs of <= 0.5 µg/ml (Table 1). Likewise, eight strains of C. tropicalis and four strains of C. krusei were resistant to ITR (MICs of >= 1 µg/ml) compared to eight C. tropicalis and six C. krusei strains being resistant to FLU (MICs of >= 64 µg/ml). Based on MIC90s, only C. tropicalis strains were considered resistant to BMS, whereas C. tropicalis and C. krusei were resistant to ITR and FLU. Nonetheless, whereas the MIC90s of BMS to C. albicans and Candida parapsilosis were 0.03 to 0.06 µg/ml, the BMS MIC90 for C. krusei was 10-fold higher (at 0.5 µg/ml). This suggests that while BMS was active against C. krusei, it was intrinsically less active against this species. C. krusei is considered intrinsically resistant to FLU. All of the yeast strains tested were susceptible to AMB.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Comparative in vitro activities of triazoles and AMB

Another yeast species often resistant to FLU is C. glabrata. Of the 16 C. glabrata strains tested, 9 (or 56%) have FLU MICs of <64 µg/ml (Table 1). Compared to other yeast species, BMS and ITR were also less active against C. glabrata; 44 and 38% of the C. glabrata strains tested had BMS and ITR MICs of <1 µg/ml, respectively.

All 32 C. neoformans strains tested were susceptible to the three azoles, as were the two Trichosporon beigelii strains (Tables 1 and 2). While one of the two Rhodotorula strains was susceptible to BMS, they were both less susceptible to ITR and FLU than to BMS (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   MICs of triazoles and AMB for species represented by five or fewer clinical isolates each

Sixteen Aspergillus strains were tested. All but one strain each of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus fumigatus had MICs of <1 µg/ml to BMS and ITR, respectively (Table 1). In contrast, all 16 strains of Aspergillus were resistant to FLU. BMS and ITR were active against other hyaline Hyphomycetes (Acremonium strictum, Paecilomyces variotii, and Penicillium sp.) but inactive (MICs >16 µg/ml) against Fusarium spp. and 4 of the 6 Pseudallescheria boydii strains (Tables 1 and 2). FLU MICs were >= 64 µg/ml for Fusarium spp., one of the four P. variotii strains, and one of the six P. boydii strains tested. AMB MICs that were >= 2 µg/ml were observed with one strain of Fusarium spp. and in five of the six strains of P. boydii.

The 25 dermatophytes were highly susceptible (MICs of <= 0.13 µg/ml) to BMS and ITR. The four dermatophytic strains with FLU MICs of >= 64 µg/ml belonged to the species Microsporum gypseum.

ITR MICs were <= 0.13 µg/ml against all of the dematiaceous fungi tested (Table 2). BMS, on the other hand, was less active than ITR against Alternaria and Curvularia spp., with MICs of 1 to 2 µg/ml. FLU MICs of >= 64 µg/ml were observed with strains of Alternaria spp., Exophiala jeanselmei, Fonsecaea pedrosoi, and Phialophora verrucosa. Cladosporium carrionii, F. pedrosoi, and P. verrucosa strains had AMB MICs of >= 2 µg/ml.

For the most part, BMS and ITR MICs of >= 1 µg/ml were inactive against Sporothrix schenckii and the zygomycetes (Mucor spp., an Absidia strain, and a Rhizopus strain) (Table 2). AMB MICs to S. schenckii and the zygomycetes were <= 1 µg/ml.

Fungicidal activities of BMS, ITR, FLU, and AMB. For the five strains of Candida spp. and one C. glabrata strain tested, AMB MFC99s were no more than twofold greater than the MICs (Table 3). The three triazoles were not fungicidal to Candida spp. One strain of Candida lusitaniae had a FLU MFC99 of 1 µg/ml.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Fungicidal activities of triazoles and AMB for yeast strains

FLU was not fungicidal to Cryptococcus neoformans (Table 3). Even though the MFC99 and MIC95s of BMS and ITR were much higher than the MICs of these drugs, the MFC95 values were often <1 µg/ml. Thus, it appears that ITR and BMS were often fungicidal to cryptococci at achievable levels of drug in serum.

BMS and ITR were often fungicidal to aspergilli (Table 4). The MFC99s, MFC95s, and MFC90s were usually the same, though these values differed by 4- to 32-fold in four strains. The BMS MFC90s were <1 µg/ml for 7 of 14 Aspergillus strains compared to 10 of the 14 strains with this level of fungicidal activity with ITR.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Antifungal activities of triazoles and AMB against Aspergillus spp.

The three triazoles were not fungicidal to non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi (Table 5).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Fungicidal activities of triazoles and AMB against filamentous fungi other than Aspergillus spp.

Susceptibility testing of BMS. Since test factors can influence the MICs to azoles, we examined a number of test factors (temperature, inoculum size, pH, duration of incubation, and human serum) on three yeast strains (data not shown). The MICs of BMS, ITR, and FLU were not affected by incubation temperature (30, 35, or 37°C) or pH (3, 4, 5, 6, or 7). The MICs increased no more than fourfold with an additional 24 h of incubation. Increasing the inocula from 102 to 105 CFU/ml affected BMS MIC the least (up to 2-fold increase), while up to 16- and 8-fold increases were observed in ITR MICs and FLU MICs, respectively. In the presence of 50% human serum, the MICs of the three azoles remained essentially unchanged (<= 4-fold increase) against two strains of C. albicans. Interestingly, with the C. tropicalis strain, the MICs of the azoles decreased by 8- to 16-fold in the presence of human serum.

The MIC distribution of BMS and ITR are listed in Table 6. Only 1 of the 24 ITR MICs with C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 was outside the acceptable quality control range recommended by the NCCLS. The ITR MICs for C. krusei ATCC 22492 was within the NCCLS-recommended, acceptable quality control range. The recommended acceptable quality control MIC ranges for BMS are 0.015 to 0.06 µg/ml for C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and 0.13 to 0.5 µg/ml for C. krusei ATCC 22492. 

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6.   MIC distribution of BMS and ITR strains to NCCLS-recommended quality control

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

BMS appears to have a broader anticandidal spectrum than ITR and FLU do. Based on their MIC90s, ITR and FLU were inactive against some strains of C. krusei and C. tropicalis, compared to BMS, which was active against all of the C. krusei strains tested but was inactive against some strains of C. tropicalis. Only 40 to 60% of the C. glabrata strains were susceptible or S-DD to the three triazoles. With the exception of the MIC90s reported by Hata et al. (4, 5) against C. tropicalis and C. glabrata, our results confirmed their findings. Hata et al. reported MIC90s in the 0.03- to 0.4-µg/ml range for the three triazoles against C. tropicalis when SAAM-F medium was used (5) but in the 12.5- to >100-µg/ml range when RPMI 1640 medium was used (4). In both studies by Hata et al. (4, 5), the BMS MIC90s to C. glabrata were 0.4 µg/ml versus the >16 µg/ml result obtained in this study.

The three triazoles were active against C. neoformans, though only BMS and ITR were fungicidal to this yeast species. In this study and the Hata et al. studies (4, 5), BMS was 2- to 4-fold more active than ITR and 40-fold more active than FLU against yeast species.

In this study, BMS and ITR were inhibitory at 1 µg/ml to all but one of the 16 strains of Aspergillus spp. Similarly, Hata et al. observed the consistent activity of BMS and ITR against Aspergillus spp. (4, 5). The antiaspergillus potencies of BMS and ITR are comparable. FLU was inactive against aspergilli. BMS and ITR were also fungicidal to 50 to 74% of the Aspergillus strains tested.

The activities of BMS and ITR against other filamentous fungi are variable compared to FLU, which was inactive against most filamentous fungi. ITR and BMS were uniformly active against dermatophytes, while FLU was less active against Microsporum gypseum. Acremonium strictum, Paecilomyces variotii, and Penicillium sp. were susceptible to BMS and ITR. Though both ITR and BMS were active against most dematiaceous fungi, ITR appeared to be somewhat more active than BMS. BMS and ITR were less active against most strains of Pseudallescheria boydii, Sporothrix schenckii, and the zygomycetes, and both were generally inactive against Fusarium spp. Unlike Aspergillus spp., BMS and ITR were not fungicidal to the other filamentous fungi.

In summary, BMS is a new triazole that is two- to fourfold more potent than ITR and up to 40-fold more active than FLU against many species of fungi. Its spectrum includes some yeast strains that are resistant to FLU. BMS is like ITR in that it is fungicidal to cryptococci and many strains of aspergilli. The in vitro profile of BMS warrants its development as a therapeutic agent in humans.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology-104, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 5 Research Pkwy., Wallingford, CT 06492. Phone: (203) 284-6370. Fax: (203) 284-6771. E-mail: joan_c._fung-tomc{at}ccmail.bms.com.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Denning, D. W., R. M. Tucker, L. H. Hanson, and D. A. Stevens. 1989. Treatment of invasive aspergillosis with itraconazole. Am. J. Med. 86:791-800[Medline].
2. Espinel-Ingroff, A., and T. M. Kerkering. 1991. Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:393-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Fung-Tomc, J. C., B. Minassain, E. Huczko, B. Kolek, D. P. Bonner, and R. E. Kessler. 1995. In vitro antifungal and fungicidal spectra of a new pradimicin derivative, BMS-181184. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:295-300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Hata, K., J. Kimura, H. Miki, T. Toyosawa, T. Nakamura, and K. Katsu. 1996. In vitro and in vivo activities of ER-30346, a novel oral triazole with a broad antifungal spectrum. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 40:2237-2242[Abstract].
5. Hata, K., J. Ueno, H. Miki, T. Toyosawa, K. Katsu, T. Nakamura, and T. Horie. 1995. ER-30346, a novel antifungal triazole. III. In vitro activity and its mode of action, abstr. F92, p. 129. In Programs and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1996. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard. Document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
7. Samaranayake, L. P., and P. Holmstrup. 1989. Oral candidiasis and human immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 18:554-564[Medline].
8. Viviani, M. A., A. M. Tortorano, M. Langer, M. Almaviva, C. Negri, S. Cristina, S. Scoccia, R. De Maria, R. Fiocchi, P. Ferrazzi, A. Goglio, G. Gavazzeni, G. Faggian, R. Rinaldi, and P. Cadrobbi. 1989. Experience with itraconazole in cryptococcosis and aspergillosis. J. Infect. 18:151-165[Medline].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 1998, p. 313-318, Vol. 42, No. 2
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pasqualotto, A. C., Denning, D. W. (2008). New and emerging treatments for fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: i19-i30 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Liang, K. P., Tleyjeh, I. M., Wilson, W. R., Roberts, G. D., Temesgen, Z. (2006). Rhino-Orbitocerebral Mucormycosis Caused by Apophysomyces elegans.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 892-898 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yan, J.-H., Marino, M. R., Smith, R. A., Kanamaluru, V., O'Mara, E. M., Grasela, D. M. (2006). The Effect of Ravuconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Nelfinavir in Healthy Male Volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 46: 193-200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cuenca-Estrella, M., Gomez-Lopez, A., Mellado, E., Garcia-Effron, G., Monzon, A., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2005). In Vitro Activity of Ravuconazole against 923 Clinical Isolates of Nondermatophyte Filamentous Fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 5136-5138 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Groll, A. H., Mickiene, D., Petraitis, V., Petraitiene, R., Kelaher, A., Sarafandi, A., Wuerthwein, G., Bacher, J., Walsh, T. J. (2005). Compartmental pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of the antifungal triazole ravuconazole following intravenous administration of its di-lysine phosphoester prodrug (BMS-379224) in rabbits. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 899-907 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cuenca-Estrella, M., Gomez-Lopez, A., Mellado, E., Garcia-Effron, G., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2004). In Vitro Activities of Ravuconazole and Four Other Antifungal Agents against Fluconazole-Resistant or -Susceptible Clinical Yeast Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3107-3111 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Petraitiene, R., Petraitis, V., Lyman, C. A., Groll, A. H., Mickiene, D., Peter, J., Bacher, J., Roussillon, K., Hemmings, M., Armstrong, D., Avila, N. A., Walsh, T. J. (2004). Efficacy, Safety, and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Dosages of Intravenously Administered Ravuconazole Lysine Phosphoester for Treatment of Experimental Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 1188-1196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dannaoui, E., Meletiadis, J., Mouton, J. W., Meis, J. F. G. M., Verweij, P. E., the Eurofung Network, (2003). In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungals. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 45-52 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Paphitou, N. I., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Paetznick, V. L., Rodriguez, J. R., Chen, E., Rex, J. H. (2002). In Vitro Activities of Investigational Triazoles against Fusarium Species: Effects of Inoculum Size and Incubation Time on Broth Microdilution Susceptibility Test Results. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 3298-3300 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espinel-Ingroff, A., Chaturvedi, V., Fothergill, A., Rinaldi, M. G. (2002). Optimal Testing Conditions for Determining MICs and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations of New and Established Antifungal Agents for Uncommon Molds: NCCLS Collaborative Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3776-3781 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espinel-Ingroff, A., Fothergill, A., Peter, J., Rinaldi, M. G., Walsh, T. J. (2002). Testing Conditions for Determination of Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations of New and Established Antifungal Agents for Aspergillus spp.: NCCLS Collaborative Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3204-3208 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Laverdiere, M., Hoban, D., Restieri, C., Habel, F. (2002). In vitro activity of three new triazoles and one echinocandin against Candida bloodstream isolates from cancer patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 119-123 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., Jones, R. N., Diekema, D. J. (2002). In Vitro Activities of Ravuconazole and Voriconazole Compared with Those of Four Approved Systemic Antifungal Agents against 6,970 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1723-1727 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clemons, K. V., Martinez, M., Calderon, L., Stevens, D. A. (2002). Efficacy of Ravuconazole in Treatment of Systemic Murine Histoplasmosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 922-924 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clemons, K. V., Stevens, D. A. (2001). Efficacy of Ravuconazole in Treatment of Mucosal Candidosis in SCID Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 3433-3436 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espinel-Ingroff, A., Bartlett, M., Chaturvedi, V., Ghannoum, M., Hazen, K. C., Pfaller, M. A., Rinaldi, M., Walsh, T. J. (2001). Optimal Susceptibility Testing Conditions for Detection of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus spp.: NCCLS Collaborative Evaluation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 1828-1835 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2001). In Vitro Fungicidal Activities of Voriconazole, Itraconazole, and Amphotericin B against Opportunistic Moniliaceous and Dematiaceous Fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 954-958 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2001). Germinated and Nongerminated Conidial Suspensions for Testing of Susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. to Amphotericin B, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, Ravuconazole, and Voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 605-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Donowitz, G. R., Maki, D. G., Crnich, C. J., Pappas, P. G., Rolston, K. V.I. (2001). Infections in the Neutropenic Patient-- New Views of an Old Problem. ASH Education Book 2001: 113-139 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Roberts, J., Schock, K., Marino, S., Andriole, V. T. (2000). Efficacies of Two New Antifungal Agents, the Triazole Ravuconazole and the Echinocandin LY-303366, in an Experimental Model of Invasive Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 3381-3388 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yamazumi, T., Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Houston, A., Hollis, R. J., Jones, R. N. (2000). In Vitro Activities of Ravuconazole (BMS-207147) against 541 Clinical Isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 2883-2886 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chiou, C. C., Groll, A. H., Walsh, T. J. (2000). New Drugs and Novel Targets for Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Cancer. The Oncologist 5: 120-135 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moore, C. B., Walls, C. M., Denning, D. W. (2000). In Vitro Activity of the New Triazole BMS-207147 against Aspergillus Species in Comparison with Itraconazole and Amphotericin B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 441-443 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Diekema, D. J., Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Houston, A., Hollis, R. J., Doern, G. V., Jones, R. N., The SENTRY PARTICIPANTS GROUP, (1999). In Vitro Activities of BMS-207147 against Over 600 Contemporary Clinical Bloodstream Isolates of Candida Species from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in North America and Latin America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 2236-2239 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Andriole, V. T. (1999). Current and future antifungal therapy: new targets for antifungal agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 44: 151-162 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sheehan, D. J., Hitchcock, C. A., Sibley, C. M. (1999). Current and Emerging Azole Antifungal Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 40-79 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., Jones, R. N., Doern, G. V., Brandt, M. E., Hajjeh, R. A. (1998). In Vitro Susceptibilities of Candida Bloodstream Isolates to the New Triazole Antifungal Agents BMS-207147, Sch 56592, and Voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42: 3242-3244 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bonner, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bonner, D. P.