Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 1998, p. 885-888, Vol. 42, No. 4
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Double-Blind Evaluation of the Safety and
Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Oral Once-Daily 750-Milligram and
1-Gram Doses of Levofloxacin in Healthy Volunteers
Shu-Chean
Chien,
Frank A.
Wong,
Cynthia L.
Fowler,
Susan V.
Callery-D'Amico,
R. Rex
Williams,
Ramchandra
Nayak, and
Andrew
T.
Chow*
The R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical
Research Institute, Raritan, New Jersey 08869
Received 26 November 1996/Returned for modification 1 July
1997/Accepted 20 January 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral levofloxacin in
16 healthy male volunteers were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned
to the treatment (n = 10) or placebo group
(n = 6). In study period 1, 750 mg of levofloxacin or
a placebo was administered orally as a single dose on day 1, followed
by a washout period on days 2 and 3; dosing resumed for days 4 to 10. Following a 3-day washout period, 1 g of levofloxacin or a placebo
was administered in a similar fashion in period 2. Plasma and urine
levofloxacin concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid
chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by
model-independent methods. Levofloxacin was rapidly absorbed after
single and multiple once-daily 750-mg and 1-g doses with an apparently
large volume of distribution. Peak plasma levofloxacin concentration
(Cmax) values were generally attained within
2 h postdose. The mean values of Cmax and
area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h
(AUC0-24) following a single 750-mg dose were 7.1 µg/ml and 71.3 µg · h/ml, respectively, compared to 8.6 µg/ml and
90.7 µg · h/ml, respectively, at steady state. Following the
single 1-g dose, mean Cmax and
AUC0-24 values were 8.9 µg/ml and 95.4 µg · h/ml, respectively; corresponding values at steady state were 11.8 µg/ml and 118 µg · h/ml. These Cmax
and AUC0-24 values indicate modest and similar degrees of
accumulation upon multiple dosing at the two dose levels. Values of
apparent total body clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of
distribution (Vss/F), half-life
(t1/2), and renal clearance (CLR)
were similar for the two dose levels and did not vary from single to
multiple dosing. Mean steady-state values for CL/F,
Vss/F,
t1/2, and CLR following 750 mg of
levofloxacin were 143 ml/min, 100 liters, 8.8 h, and 116 ml/min,
respectively; corresponding values for the 1-g dose were 146 ml/min,
105 liters, 8.9 h, and 105 ml/min. In general, the
pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in healthy subjects following 750-mg
and 1-g single and multiple once-daily oral doses appear to be
consistent with those found in previous studies of healthy volunteers
given 500-mg doses. Levofloxacin was well tolerated at either high dose
level. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were
nausea and headache.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Levofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone
antibiotic which is the levorotatory isomer of the racemate ofloxacin.
The antibacterial activity of ofloxacin is known to reside almost
entirely within the l isomer, while the d and
l isomers contribute equally to the toxicological profile
(25). Levofloxacin has broad spectrum of in vitro activity
against both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, including
Streptococcus pneumoniae,
Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus
pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter
cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (10, 14, 25). It also has in vitro activity
against some anaerobes and other pathogens including Legionella
pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae (2, 17, 19).
The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following 500-mg oral and
intravenous doses have been studied (4). Levofloxacin
pharmacokinetics were linear and predictable for single and multiple
500-mg once-daily oral and intravenous dosing regimens, and the
pharmacokinetic parameter values obtained following oral and
intravenous administrations were similar. The oral bioavailability was
virtually complete, with a mean absolute bioavailability of
99%.
Levofloxacin was excreted renally, with a renal clearance of
approximately 99 ml/min and a long elimination half-life of 7 h.
Data from a variety of in vitro animal and human studies have suggested
that the bactericidal activity of the fluoroquinolones is rapid and
concentration dependent (3, 8, 9). Preliminary findings for
humans have supported the in vitro data (12, 22). Fluoroquinolones also exhibit significant postantibiotic effect against
the susceptible organisms (13, 18). Thus, for the fluoroquinolones, high doses given infrequently (e.g., once daily) may
be more efficacious than smaller doses given more frequently and may be
less likely to result in the emergence of resistant organisms.
Levofloxacin at 500 mg once daily has been shown to be safe and
efficacious for the treatment of several commonly encountered infections in adults, including community-acquired pneumonia, sinusitis, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and urinary tract
infections (1, 7, 11, 20, 23). However, difficult-to-treat infections, for example, those due to more resistant organisms or those
in poorly perfused tissues, may require higher doses. Before higher
doses of levofloxacin can be tested in clinical trials, it is
imperative that the safety and linear pharmacokinetics be confirmed.
Therefore, the primary objective of this investigation was to evaluate
the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral levofloxacin following single
and multiple once-daily 750-mg and 1-g doses given to healthy male
volunteers. These doses are 50 and 100% higher, respectively, than the
usual dose (500 mg once daily) currently approved for antimicrobial
treatment in the United States.
(This study was presented at the 36th Interscience Conference on
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, La., 15 to 18 September, 1996.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Subjects.
Healthy male subjects between the ages of 18 and
55 years were eligible for entry into the study. Subjects were
qualified for the study if they had normal findings following a
prestudy medical history and physical examination performed within 2 weeks of study entry. Subject eligibility was restricted to those with no evidence of significant major organ dysfunction; abnormal
electrocardiogram; or clinically significant abnormal hematologic,
serum chemistry, or urinalysis laboratory values. Additionally, all
participants had body weights within 30% of the ideal. Key exclusion
criteria were a previous history of allergy to a fluoroquinolone,
alcohol or controlled-substance abuse, or use of an investigational
agent within 30 days of study entry. Potential subjects were also
excluded if they used any medication within 3 days prior to
administration of the first study dose. All subjects signed an informed
consent form approved by the institutional review board.
Study design and drug administration.
A randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design study was conducted.
Subjects were randomly assigned to either the levofloxacin
(n = 10) or placebo (n = 6) treatment
group. The levofloxacin group received 750 mg (one 500-mg tablet and two 125-mg tablets) of levofloxacin and the placebo group received identically appearing placebo tablets. All tablets were provided by The
R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, N.J. A
single dose of the study drug was administered to each subject on day
1; there was a washout period on days 2 and 3, followed by once-daily
dosing from days 4 to 10. Following a 3-day washout period (days 11 to
13), subjects received 1 g of levofloxacin (two 500-mg tablets) or
identically appearing placebo tablets according to an identical dosing
scheme (days 14 to 26). Each dose was administered in the morning with
8 oz of water. Dosing on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 20, and 23 was
completed in a fasting state that lasted from 8 h prior to dosing
to 2 h postdosing. On these days, clinical laboratory tests were
performed and/or blood was drawn for pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Fasting on other drug administration days lasted from 2 h before
dosing to 2 h after dosing. Ingestion of alcohol, caffeine,
substances containing methylxanthine (e.g., chocolate), or antacids was
not permitted during the study period. Subjects were confined from
12 h prior to administration of the first dose until after all
final plasma and urine samples had been collected on day 24.
Sample collection.
Samples (5 ml) of venous blood for the
determination of plasma levofloxacin concentrations were collected from
an indwelling catheter on days 1 and 14 immediately prior to the first
dose and then at the following times postdosing: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0, 24.0, 36.0, 48.0, and 60.0 h. On days 4 to 9 and 17 to 22 of therapy, a single blood sample was obtained just prior
to the morning dose. Following the last dose on days 10 and 23, blood
samples were obtained immediately prior to dosing and at the following
times postdosing: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0, 24.0, 36.0, 48.0, 60.0, and 72.0 h. Blood samples were collected in
heparinized tubes and centrifuged; the plasma was separated and stored
at
20°C until it was assayed.
Urine samples for assessment of levofloxacin concentrations were
collected beginning 8 h prior to the first dose on days 1 and 14 and at the following intervals postdosing: 0 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to
12, 12 to 24, 24 to 48, and 48 to 72 h. The volume and pH of each
urine sample were recorded, and a 20-ml aliquot from each collection
was frozen at
20°C until it was assayed.
Safety analysis.
Adverse events were monitored on a daily
basis for the duration of the study. Each adverse event was assessed by
the investigator as to severity (mild, moderate, or severe) and
relationship to the study drug (definite, probable, possible, remote,
unlikely). Fasting clinical laboratory tests (hematology, serum
chemistry, and urinalysis) were performed in the morning on study days
1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 15, 17, 20, and 24. Any abnormal laboratory result that resulted in additional testing or therapy was considered to be
clinically significant and was to be reported as an adverse event.
Laboratory values that were substantially outside the range of normal
values (usually 10 to 20% depending on the analyte) were considered to
be markedly abnormal. A complete physical examination was conducted on
day 24, and results were compared to those of the predosing physical
examination. Ophthalmologic examinations, including funduscopy and slit
lamp, visual acuity, and color perception (Farnesworth-Hue color test)
tests, were performed on study days 0, 11, 13, and 24.
Analytical procedures.
The concentration of total
levofloxacin in plasma and urine was determined by a high-pressure
liquid chromatography method (26). Briefly, the procedure
utilized single-step liquid-liquid extraction with
methyl-tert-butyl ether. A reversed-phase C18 column was used to separate levofloxacin and the internal standard (ciprofloxacin). Elution was accomplished isocratically by using a
mobile phase consisting of 0.005 M copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate in
0.01 M L-isoleucine-methanol (87.5:12.5 [vol/vol]) at a
flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. UV detection (330 nm) was used to measure peak
area. For plasma, the range of detection was linear from 0.08 to 5.12 µg/ml; the inter- and intra-assay precision values (expressed as
percent coefficient of variation) for levofloxacin were consistently
below 10%, and the accuracy values were consistently within ±10% of
the target. For urine, the range of detection was linear from 25 to
2,000 µg/ml; the inter- and intra-assay precision values for
levofloxacin were consistently below 10%, and the accuracy values were
consistently within ±10% of the target. Samples were diluted in the
appropriate matrix and reassayed when concentrations were outside the
range of detection.
Pharmacokinetic analysis.
Levofloxacin plasma and urine
concentration-time data were analyzed by standard noncompartmental
methods (15). The levofloxacin absorption rate following
oral administration was assumed to be zero order and complete at the
time (Tmax) to reach the peak concentration (Cmax) of the drug in plasma. Elimination was
assumed to be linear and first order. This model has been successfully
applied to characterize the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following
oral administration to healthy and human immunodeficiency
virus-seropositive subjects (5, 16). Estimated
pharmacokinetic parameters of levofloxacin included the area under the
plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to t h
(AUC0-t) as measured by the
trapezoidal-summation method; the AUC for the 24-h dosing interval
(AUC0-24); AUC0-
calculated as
AUC0-last + Cplast/kel, where Cplast is the last measurable plasma concentration;
kel is the terminal elimination rate constant,
i.e., the slope of the plasma concentration-versus-time profile at the
terminal log-linear phase, as determined by ordinary least-squares
regression; and AUC0-last is the AUC from 0 h to the
time corresponding to Cplast; the terminal plasma
elimination half-life (t1/2), calculated as
0.693/kel; the apparent total body clearance
(CL/F) calculated as dose/AUC0-
for single
dosing and as dose/AUC0-24 at steady state; apparent
volume of distribution (Vss/F)
calculated as CL/F · (MRT
Tmax/2), where MRT refers to the mean residence time following drug administration determined in accordance with the
method of Smith and Schentag (24). The
Cmax and Tmax values were
estimated by visual inspection of the plasma drug
concentration-versus-time data. Renal clearance (CLR) of
the drug was estimated as
Aet/AUC0-t, where
Aet refers to the cumulative amount of
levofloxacin recovered in the urine at time t. The degree of
accumulation was determined from the ratios of
Cmax and AUC0-24 at steady state to
the single-dose values.
Statistical analysis.
Page's test (21) was used
to test for the attainment of steady state based on the trough
concentrations measured during multiple dosing. Page's test is a
nonparametric test for increasing (or decreasing) trends. The null
hypothesis in testing for the attainment of steady state is that the
mean trough concentration values on the different days under
consideration are equal, and the alternative hypothesis is that there
is an increasing trend in the mean values over the days under
consideration. Steady state is concluded if the null hypothesis is not
rejected at a 5% level of significance.
 |
RESULTS |
Patient population.
The characteristics of the treatment
groups receiving levofloxacin or the placebo were comparable. Sixteen
healthy male subjects ranging in age from 19 to 51 years were enrolled
(mean ages ± standard deviations [SD], 26.3 ± 6.0 and
35.2 ± 10.5 years for levofloxacin and placebo groups,
respectively). Weights ranged from 62 to 105 kg (mean weights ± SD of 78 ± 14 kg and 80 ± 14 kg for levofloxacin and
placebo groups, respectively). Fifteen of the 16 subjects completed the
study. One subject in the placebo group was prematurely discontinued
from the study because of deterioration of color perception and
photopsia. All 16 subjects were included in the safety analysis;
pharmacokinetic analysis was limited to the 10 levofloxacin group
participants. No subject required a dose reduction or concomitant
therapy during the study period.
Pharmacokinetics.
The mean levofloxacin plasma
concentration-versus-time profiles for the single and multiple
once-daily doses are illustrated in Fig.
1. The test of Page (21)
suggested that steady state was attained 24 h from the start of
multiple once-daily dosing for both the 750-mg and the 1-g doses.
Levofloxacin was rapidly absorbed after single and multiple once-daily
750-mg and 1-g doses, with an apparently large volume of distribution.
Mean Cmax and AUC0-24 values ± SD following a single 750-mg dose were 7.13 ± 1.44 µg/ml and
71.3 ± 10.3 µg · h/ml, respectively, compared to
8.60 ± 1.86 µg/ml and 90.7 ± 17.6 µg · h/ml at
steady state (Table 1). Following the
single 1-g dose, mean Cmax and
AUC0-24 values ± SD were 8.85 ± 1.86 µg/ml
and 95.4 ± 16.0 µg · h/ml, respectively; corresponding
values at steady state were 11.8 ± 2.52 µg/ml and 118 ± 18.9 µg · h/ml. The mean ratios of the values of
Cmax and AUC0-24 at steady state to
the corresponding single-dose values ± SD were 1.22 ± 0.25 and 1.27 ± 0.11, respectively, for the 750-mg dose; and 1.34 ± 0.16 and 1.24 ± 0.06, respectively, for the 1-g dose. These
indicate modest and similar degrees of accumulation of levofloxacin for
the two dose levels upon multiple dosing.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mean plasma levofloxacin concentration-versus-time
profiles following single and multiple once-daily 750-mg and 1-g oral
doses of levofloxacin for 10 healthy subjects. Error bars indicate
SD.
|
|
Apparent CL/
F,
Vss/
F, and
t1/2 values for the two doses were similar and
did not vary between single and multiple dosing (Table
1). In addition,
the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin were consistent
at the two dose
levels based on the mean ratio of the 1-g to 750-mg
disposition
parameters (Table
2).
Elimination of levofloxacin by renal routes is summarized in Table
1.
Mean renal clearance values were found to be not significantly
different when day 1 and steady-state values at either dose level
were
compared. Renal clearance accounted for approximately 70
to 80% of
apparent total plasma clearance. Mean ratios of the
1-g to 750-mg renal
elimination parameters were nearly identical
following both single and
multiple dosing (Table
2).
Safety.
Of the 10 subjects receiving levofloxacin, 3 subjects
reported adverse events considered to be related to levofloxacin after receiving the 750-mg dose and 4 subjects reported drug-related adverse
events following the 1-g dose. Most of the adverse events were
considered mild and were resolved spontaneously without therapeutic intervention or drug discontinuation. Of the six subjects in the placebo group, three reported adverse events considered to be drug
related. The most frequently reported adverse events (regardless of
relationship to the study drug) were nausea (one event, 750-mg levofloxacin dose; one event, placebo group; three events, 1-g levofloxacin dose) and headache (two events, 750-mg levofloxacin dose;
two events, placebo group; one event, 1-g levofloxacin dose). The
overall distribution and frequencies of these and other adverse events
among the placebo-treated subjects and the levofloxacin-treated subjects were comparable at both dose levels. No clinically meaningful alterations in laboratory parameters, vital signs, and repeat physical
examination (including ophthalmologic evaluation) results from baseline
measurements were recognized for either treatment group over the course
of the study. No markedly abnormal laboratory values were noted. In
general, single- and multiple-dose administration of 750 mg and 1 g of levofloxacin to healthy subjects was found to be safe and well
tolerated.
One placebo-treated subject, a 45-year-old Caucasian male without
significant medical history, was prematurely discontinued
from the
study due to an adverse event.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This is the first study to report the safety and pharmacokinetic
disposition of levofloxacin following multiple once-daily 750-mg and
1-g doses given to healthy male subjects. The pharmacokinetics of oral
levofloxacin at both dose levels, following single and multiple
once-daily doses, were found to be similar based on comparable values
of apparent clearance and volume of distribution, estimates of
elimination half-life, and levels of urinary excretion of unchanged drug. Expected dose-related differences in mean steady-state
Cmax and AUC values between the two dose levels
were observed. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the
750-mg and 1-g doses were also similar to those obtained in a previous
study with 500-mg levofloxacin doses (4), showing that
levofloxacin exhibits linear pharmacokinetics over this dose range (500 mg to 1 g).
This study also demonstrated that high doses of levofloxacin are safe.
The incidence of adverse events following multiple 750-mg and 1-g
levofloxacin doses was nearly identical to that reported during placebo
administration. In addition, the adverse events reported in this study,
nausea and headache, have been reported in clinical studies utilizing
the 500-mg daily dose of levofloxacin. Thus, there were no apparent
dose-related adverse effects seen in this study.
Although not noted in clinical trials with levofloxacin (500 mg once
daily), visual disturbances, including blurred vision, dimmed vision,
disturbed vision, diplopia, change in color perception, overbrightness
of lights, flashing lights, decreased visual activity, photophobia, eye
pain, visual loss, constriction of visual fields, and cataracts, have
resulted from trials of other fluoroquinolones (6).
Therefore, a thorough ophthalmologic examination was performed for
subjects treated with high doses of levofloxacin. No evidence of
treatment-emergent visual disturbances were found.
In conclusion, since fluoroquinolones are concentration dependent in
their kill rates, it is expected that administration of levofloxacin
once daily would result in better efficacy than administering the same
total daily dose in a divided fashion. The safety and pharmacokinetic
findings of this study support further clinical evaluation of these
high once-daily doses of levofloxacin for difficult-to-treat
infections.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 1000 Route 202 South,
Raritan, NJ 08869-0620. Phone: (908) 704-4057. Fax: (908)
253-0448. E-mail: achow{at}prius.jnj.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adelglass, J.,
C. A. DeAbate,
P. McElvaine, and C. L. Fowler.
1996.
A comparison of levofloxacin and amoxicillin clavulanate for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Presented at the Infectious Diseases Society of America 34th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, La., 18 to 20 September 1996
.
|
| 2.
|
Baltch, A. L.,
R. P. Smith, and W. Ritz.
1995.
Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of levofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, and rifampin used singly and in combination against Legionella pneumophila.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1661-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Blaser, J.,
B. B. Stone,
M. C. Groner, and S. H. Zinner.
1987.
Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:1054-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chien, S.-C.,
M. C. Rogge,
L. G. Gisclon,
C. Curtin,
F. Wong,
J. Natarajan,
R. R. Williams,
C. L. Fowler,
W. K. Cheung, and A. T. Chow.
1997.
Pharmacokinetic profile of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral or intravenous doses.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:2256-2260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Child, J.,
D. Mortiboy,
J. M. Andrews,
A. T. Chow, and R. Wise.
1995.
Open-label crossover study to determine pharmacokinetics and penetration of two dose regimens of levofloxacin into inflammatory fluid.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:2749-2751[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
| Christ, W., and B. Esch. 1994. Adverse reactions
to fluoroquinolones in adults and children. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract.
3(Suppl. 3):S168-S176.
|
| 7.
|
DeAbate, C. A.,
M. Russell,
P. McElvaine,
H. Faris,
J. Upchurch,
C. L. Fowler,
E. M. Polak, and N. S. Morgan.
1997.
Safety and efficacy of oral levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
Respir. Care
42:206-213.
|
| 8.
|
Drusano, G. L.,
D. E. Johnson,
M. Rosen, and H. C. Standiford.
1993.
Pharmacodynamics of a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:483-490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
| Dudley, M. N., H. D. Mandler, D. Gilbert, J. Ericson, K. H. Mayer, and S. H. Zinner. 1987. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin.
Am. J. Med. 82(Suppl. 4A):363-368.
|
| 10.
|
Eliopoulos, G. M.,
C. B. Wennersten, and R. C. Moellering, Jr.
1996.
Comparative in vitro activity of levofloxacin and ofloxacin against gram-positive bacteria.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
25:35-41[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
File, T. M., Jr.,
J. Segreti,
L. Dunbar,
R. Player,
R. R. Williams,
C. Kojak, and A. Rubin.
1997.
A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1965-1972[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Forrest, A.,
D. E. Nix,
C. H. Ballow,
T. F. Goss,
M. C. Birmingham, and J. J. Schentag.
1993.
Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:1073-1081[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Fu, K. P.,
B. Foleno, and M. E. Rosenthale.
1992.
The postantibiotic suppressive effect of L-ofloxacin, an optically active isomer of ofloxacin.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
15:375-378[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Fujimoto, T., and S. Mitsuhashi.
1990.
In vitro antibacterial activity of DR-3355, the S-( ) isomer of ofloxacin.
Chemotherapy
36:268-276[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gibaldi, M., and D. Perrier.
1982.
Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed.
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 16.
|
Goodwin, D. S.,
H. A. Gallis,
A. T. Chow,
F. A. Wong,
S. C. Flor, and J. A. Bartlett.
1994.
Pharmacokinetics and safety of levofloxacin in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:799-804[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Hammerschlag, M. R.,
K. K. Wumei, and P. M. Roblin.
1992.
In vitro activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and other antibiotics against Chlamydia pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:1573-1574[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
McDonald, P. J., and H. Pruul.
1990.
Quinolones and the immune system, p. 107-122.
In
C. Siporin, et al. (ed.), The new generation of quinolones. Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y.
|
| 19.
|
Molitoris, E.,
H. M. Wexler, and S. M. Finegold.
1996.
In vitro activity of levofloxacin against bacteria from skin and soft tissue infections, abstr. E88, p. 97.
In
Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 20.
|
Nicols, R. L.,
J. W. Smith,
L. O. Gentry,
J. Gezon,
T. Campbell,
P. Sokol, and R. R. Williams.
1997.
Multicenter, randomized study comparing levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.
South. Med. J.
90:1193-1200[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Page, E. B.
1963.
Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: a significance test for linear ranks.
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
58:216-230.
|
| 22.
|
Peloquin, C. A.,
T. J. Cumbo,
D. E. Nix,
M. F. Sands, and J. J. Schentag.
1989.
Intravenous ciprofloxacin in patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections: impact of plasma concentration, organism MIC, and clinical condition on bacterial eradication.
Arch. Intern. Med.
149:2269-2273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Richard, G. A.,
I. N. Klimberg,
C. Fowler, and S. Callery-D'Amico.
1996.
A combined analysis of two studies comparing levofloxacin (LVFX) with two other fluoroquinolones for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (pyelo), abstr. LM3, p. 281.
In
Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 24.
|
Smith, I. L., and J. J. Schentag.
1984.
Noncompartmental determination of the steady-state volume of distribution during multiple dosing.
J. Pharm. Sci.
73:281-282[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Une, T.,
T. Fujimoto,
K. Sato, and Y. Osada.
1988.
In vitro activity of DR-3355, an optically active ofloxacin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
32:1336-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Wong, F. A.,
S. J. Juzwin, and S. C. Flor.
1997.
Rapid stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of levofloxacin in human plasma and urine.
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
15:765-771[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 1998, p. 885-888, Vol. 42, No. 4
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Frei, C. R., Wiederhold, N. P., Burgess, D. S.
(2008). Antimicrobial breakpoints for Gram-negative aerobic bacteria based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models with Monte Carlo simulation. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 621-628
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Noreddin, A. M., Haynes, V. L., Zhanel, G. G.
(2005). Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the New Quinolones. Journal of Pharmacy Practice
18: 432-443
[Abstract]
-
Campion, J. J., Chung, P., McNamara, P. J., Titlow, W. B., Evans, M. E.
(2005). Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Evolution of Levofloxacin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 2189-2199
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, X., Zhao, X., Drlica, K.
(2002). Selection of Streptococcus pneumoniae Mutants Having Reduced Susceptibility to Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 522-524
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Malone, R. S., Fish, D. N., Abraham, E., Teitelbaum, I.
(2001). Pharmacokinetics of Levofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 2949-2954
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chow, A. T., Fowler, C., Williams, R. R., Morgan, N., Kaminski, S., Natarajan, J.
(2001). Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple 750-Milligram Doses of Intravenous Levofloxacin in Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 2122-2125
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Destache, C. J., Pakiz, C. B., Larsen, C., Owens, H., Dash, A. K.
(2001). Cerebrospinal fluid penetration and pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. J Antimicrob Chemother
47: 611-615
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gotfried, M. H., Danziger, L. H., Rodvold, K. A.
(2001). Steady-State Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Levofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in Healthy Adult Subjects. Chest
119: 1114-1122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Entenza, J. M., Caldelari, I., Glauser, M. P., Moreillon, P.
(1999). Efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci. J Antimicrob Chemother
44: 775-786
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tomioka, H., Sato, K., Akaki, T., Kajitani, H., Kawahara, S., Sakatani, M.
(1999). Comparative In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of the Newly Synthesized Quinolone HSR-903, Sitafloxacin (DU-6859a), Gatifloxacin (AM-1155), and Levofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium Complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43: 3001-3004
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chambers, H. F., Xiang, Q., Liu, , Chow, L. L., Hackbarth, C.
(1999). Efficacy of Levofloxacin for Experimental Aortic-Valve Endocarditis in Rabbits Infected with Viridans Group Streptococcus or Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43: 2742-2746
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pendland, S. L., Diaz-Linares, M., Garey, K. W., Woodward, J. G., Ryu, S., Danziger, L. H.
(1999). Bactericidal Activity and Postantibiotic Effect of Levofloxacin against Anaerobes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43: 2547-2549
[Abstract]
[Full Text]