Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 1998, p. 936-938, Vol. 42, No. 4
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University
of Zürich, CH8028 Zürich, Switzerland
Received 6 October 1997/Returned for modification 16 December
1997/Accepted 6 February 1998
The staphylococcal pentaglycine side chain of the peptidoglycan is
reduced to one glycine in femAB null mutants. This is
associated with increased susceptibility to methicillin and to a whole
range of unrelated antibiotics as well. Genetic evidence suggests that femAB null mutants are only viable because of a
compensatory mutation in an unlinked site.
The cell wall in
Staphylococcus aureus consists of about 40 layers of
peptidoglycan strands that are highly cross-linked via the long and
flexible pentaglycine side chain that is attached to peptidoglycan-stem
peptide (10). This side chain is synthesized by sequential
addition of glycines donated by cell-wall-specific glycyl-tRNAs
(12) and at least two factors, FemA and FemB, encoded by the
femAB operon (11, 14). Strains lacking FemA
(6) and femAB null mutants (14) form
only monoglycine side chains and poorly cross-linked cell walls. Such
strains are resistant to lysostaphin, a glycylglycine endopeptidase,
and hypersusceptible to In the original femAB null mutant, AS145 (mec
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Increased Overall Antibiotic Susceptibility in
Staphylococcus aureus femAB Null Mutants
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-lactams. The low-affinity
penicillin-binding protein PBP2', which confers methicillin resistance
(Mcr) in S. aureus, cannot express
Mcr in femAB mutants (8, 14). We show
here that femA and femAB null mutants, besides
being hypersusceptible to all
-lactams, became more susceptible to
other classes of antibiotics as well. We postulate, moreover, that
femAB null mutants have to undergo compensatory mutations to
survive with such a drastically shortened side chain.
femAB::tetK), the femAB operon is
replaced with a tetK cassette (14) (Fig. 1). Attempts to transduce the
tetK marker with transducing phage 80
(3) from
AS145 to other strains by selecting for Tcr were
unsuccessful, except when 8 µg of lysostaphin ml
1 was
added as a second selective agent. We therefore introduced into AS145,
close to tetK, another selective marker by transducing transposon Tn551, which confers, due to ermB,
high-level constitutive erythromycin resistance (Emr). We
used strains BB291 (mec
2000chr::Tn551 [3]) and BB413 (mec
8chr::Tn551
[4]) as donors for the transduction of the inserts
2000 and
8, respectively (Fig. 1). Both insertions were known to
cause no apparent change in phenotype in complex medium and had no
negative effects on methicillin resistance (Table
1). By testing the transductants on 5 µg of methicillin ml
1 by replica plating, we showed
that the femAB+ wild-type allele was
cotransduced with either
8 or with
2000 with a frequency of 96%
when selecting for Emr. One of the few transductants that
was still Mcs and that therefore had retained the
femAB deletion, strain K14 (
8chr::Tn551
femAB::tetK), was utilized as a donor to
transduce
femAB::tetK together with
8 into
different isogenic recipients. This allowed the use of erythromycin
instead of tetracycline as the selective agent. From the cotransduction
frequency determined above, we expected a reciprocal cotransduction
frequency of
femAB::tetK with
8 close to
96%. Transductants with the femAB null mutation were
expected to become lysostaphin resistant and
-lactam
hypersusceptible. However, although
8 was transduced with a normal
frequency of 10
6 per PFU, none of the several hundred
transductants tested had received
femAB::tetK. This lack of
cotransduction suggested that the femAB deletion by itself
may be lethal to the cell unless some compensatory mutation occurs to
allow survival. This compensatory mutation seemed somehow to be favored
by the selection for lysostaphin resistance. Therefore, we suspected
that our initial femAB null mutant AS145, and possibly also
the femA null mutant UK17 [mec femA (ochre)
(6)], the latter constructed by chemical mutagenesis with
subsequent selection for lysostaphin resistance (9), may have acquired some additional hidden mutation(s) during their construction. To test this hypothesis, we restored in AS145 and UK17
the femAB wild-type allele by phage 80
-mediated
cotransduction of
2000 with the donor strain BB291. We obtained the
strains BB1305 (mec
2000chr::Tn551) and BB1308
(mec
2000chr::Tn551), respectively. Strains BB1305 and BB1308 regained lysostaphin
susceptibility and Mcr; however, their growth rate remained
almost as low as before (Table 1). This suggested that they still
harbored some defects, although in Southern blots, they showed the
expected restriction pattern around the femAB region (Fig.
2). To characterize them further, their
susceptibility to other antibiotics was analyzed. The femAB
null mutants AS145 and K14 as well as the femA mutant UK17
had a greatly increased susceptibility to all
-lactams and additionally showed increased susceptibility to other cell
wall-directed antibiotics, such as fosfomycin, bacitracin, teicoplanin,
and, to a lesser extent, vancomycin (Table 1). Levels of resistance to
unrelated antibiotics such as chloramphenicol, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, and sulfamethoxazole were reduced by a
factor of at least 2 to 4 in the strains with the femAB null mutation and in the femA mutant (data not shown). Although
this was but a small difference, the lowered susceptibility was
reproducible in repeated measurements done by different methods, such
as broth microdilution, E-tests, and gradient plates. The backcrosses
BB1305 and BB1308 with the repaired femAB region regained
susceptibility values corresponding to those of the parent BB270,
except for the bacitracin MIC for strain BB1305, which remained low for
yet unknown reasons, but which may be a consequence of the compensatory mutation.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Genetic restriction map of the femAB region.
The bottom line shows the EcoRV fragments recognized by the
10.5-kb PstI probe indicated above by the heavy bar. The
fragments are numbered according to their size as they light up in the
BB255 and BB270 digests shown in Fig. 2. The approximate insertion
sites of the 5.2-kb-long Tn551 inserts
2000,
2006, and
8 in that part of the chromosome are shown by triangles. The
deletion in AS145 is shown by a black box, which contained a
substitution of a tetK cassette of 1.8 kb, as shown by an
inverted triangle. Tn551 has no EcoRV site,
whereas the tetK cassette has an internal EcoRV
site.
TABLE 1.
Doubling time and MICs

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Restriction fragment size polymorphism due to genetic
manipulations. EcoRV restriction digests of the different
strains were probed with the 10.5-kb PstI fragment covering
femAB (Fig. 1). Lanes a and b, strains BB255 and BB270,
respectively, both showing the wild-type pattern as numbered in Fig. 1
(bottom line). Lane c, BB815, a femB mutant with the
2006::Tn551 in fragment 6, which has moved up
by 5.2 kb. Lane d, strain AS145, which has lost fragments 6 and 4 by
the deletion but has instead two new fusion fragments containing parts
of the tetK cassette (14). Lane e, strain K14,
which is essentially the same as AS145 with the insert
8::Tn551 in fragment 5, which has moved up by
5.2 kb to the top of the lane. Lane f, strain BB1305, which is a
backcross of femAB into AS145 by cotransduction of the
insert
2000::Tn551 in fragment 1, and in which
the wild-type restriction pattern around femAB is restored,
and fragment 1 is moved up by 5.2 kb. Lane g, strain UK17, with a point
mutation in femA that does not appear on the gel. Lane h,
strain 1308, femAB+ backcross with insert
2000::Tn551, the same as strain BB1305. Lane i,
strain BB413, the donor of
8::Tn551. Lane j,
strain BB291, the donor of
2000::Tn551.
Also tetracycline susceptibility (Tcs) was higher (the MICs
of tetracycline were lower) in femA mutant UK17 than in
wild-type BB270, and the tetK resistance marker in the
femAB null mutant AS145 was able to increase Tcr
only about sixfold compared to UK17. The final Tcr was,
therefore, in AS145 and K14 only about three times higher than that in
the wild-type strains, too small a difference to allow selection of
transductants as in our previous experiments. The resistance mediated
by TetK is due to a membrane-bound tetracycline efflux protein
(7) and is gene dosage dependent, so that, besides the
femAB deletion, other factors may be responsible for the
relatively low resistance mediated by TetK in these particular mutants.
Furthermore, a drastic reduction in the MIC of erythromycin was seen in
the femAB null mutant K14, which harbored the
ermB-encoded Emr marker. The MIC dropped from
over 256 µg ml
1 in strains BB815, BB413, and BB291 to
16 µg ml
1 in K14 (Table 1). Why ErmB, a ribosomal
methylase (5), produces in a femAB null
background such a low level of resistance is unclear. The
Emr was again fully restored in the
femAB+ backcrosses BB1305 and BB1308.
The consequence of femAB inactivation seems to be a
generally greater susceptibility to antibiotics, since backcrossing of the wild-type femAB allele into the mutants restored
resistance. This increased susceptibility suggests that more than the
formation of the pentaglycine side chain may be affected. A higher
uncontrolled influx of drugs into the cells may occur, due to the
impaired peptidoglycan precursor formation that may also affect the
cell membrane organization. Two indications that compensatory
mutation(s) may have occurred securing survival of the cells were (i)
that the growth rate in the backcrosses remained low and (ii) that transduction of the femAB null mutation was impossible even
when selecting for the Tn551 marker introduced nearby. This
suggests that deletion of the femAB operon without
concomitant compensatory rearrangements may be lethal. Potential
inhibitory agents directed against FemA may therefore not only
potentiate the effect of
-lactams, but may ultimately be lethal to
the cells. As expected from factors analogous to FemA and FemB found in
coagulase-negative staphylococci (1), this concept could be
valid for all staphylococci.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation grant 31-42182.94 to B.B.B. and by a scholarship of the State Education Commission of China for Senior Visiting Scholars to B.L.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zürich, Gloriastr. 32, Postfach, CH8028 Zürich, Switzerland. Phone: 41 1 634 26 50. Fax: 41 1 634 49 06. E-mail: bberger{at}immv.unizh.ch.
Present address: Department of Pharmacology, North Sichuan Medical
College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637007, China.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alborn, W. E., J. A. Hoskins, S. Unal, J. E. Flokowitsch, C. A. Hayes, J. E. Dotzlaf, W. K. Yeh, and P. L. Skatrud. 1996. Cloning and characterization of femA and femB from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Gene 180:177-181[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Baker, C. N.,
S. A. Stocker,
D. H. Culver, and C. Thornsberry.
1991.
Comparison of the E test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:533-538 |
| 3. |
Berger-Bächi, B.
1983.
Increase in transduction efficiency of Tn551 mediated by the methicillin resistance marker.
J. Bacteriol.
154:533-535 |
| 4. | Berger-Bächi, B., A. Strässle, and F. H. Kayser. 1986. Characterization of an isogenic set of methicillin-resistant and susceptible mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 5:697-701[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Eady, E. A.,
J. I. Ross,
J. L. Tipper,
C. E. Walters,
J. H. Cove, and W. C. Noble.
1993.
Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
31:211-217 |
| 6. |
Ehlert, K.,
W. Schröder, and H. Labischinski.
1997.
Specificities of FemA and FemB for different glycine residues: FemB cannot substitute for FemA in staphylococcal peptidoglycan pentaglycine side chain formation.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7573-7576 |
| 7. |
Ginn, S. L.,
M. H. Brown, and R. A. Skurray.
1997.
Membrane topology of the metal-tetracycline/H+ antiporter TetA(K) from Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
179:3786-3789 |
| 8. |
Henze, U.,
T. Sidow,
J. Wecke,
H. Labischinski, and B. Berger-Bächi.
1993.
Influence of femB on methicillin resistance and peptidoglycan metabolism in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
175:1612-1620 |
| 9. | Kopp, U., M. Roos, J. Wecke, and H. Labischinski. 1996. Staphylococcal peptidoglycan interpeptide bridge biosynthesis: a novel antistaphylococcal target? Microb. Drug Resist. 2:29-41. [Medline] |
| 10. | Labischinski, H. 1992. Consequences of the interaction of beta-lactam antibiotics with penicillin binding proteins from sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 181:241-265[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Maidhof, H.,
B. Reinicke,
P. Blümel,
B. Berger-Bächi, and H. Labischinski.
1991.
femA, which encodes a factor essential for expression of methicillin resistance, affects glycine content of peptidoglycan in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains.
J. Bacteriol.
173:3507-3513 |
| 12. |
Matsuhashi, M.,
C. P. Dietrich, and J. L. Strominger.
1967.
Biosynthesis of the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. The role of soluble ribonucleic acid and of lipid intermediates in glycine incorporation in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Biol. Chem.
242:3191-3206 |
| 13. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard. NCCLS document M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa . |
| 14. |
Strandén, A. M.,
K. Ehlert,
H. Labischinski, and B. Berger-Bächi.
1997.
Cell wall monoglycine cross-bridges and methicillin hypersusceptibility in a femAB null mutant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
179:9-16 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»