Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 1998, p. 1718-1721, Vol. 42, No. 7
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacokinetic Study of an Oral Cephalosporin,
Cefdinir, in Hemodialysis Patients
Akira
Hishida,1,*
Kazuhisa
Ohishi,1
Satoru
Nagashima,2
Mitsutaka
Kanamaru,2
Masao
Obara,3 and
Ayako
Kitada3
First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu
University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu
431-31,1
Sanpoukai Shitoro Clinic,
Hamamatsu 432,2 and
Post-Marketing
Surveillance I, Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka
532,3 Japan
Received 28 August 1997/Returned for modification 21 February
1998/Accepted 30 April 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The pharmacokinetics of cefdinir were investigated in six
hemodialysis patients. For the present study, two tests were carried out, one with 4 h of hemodialysis and the other without
hemodialysis. Cefdinir was given orally to each patient in a dose of
100 mg, and blood was collected serially for 48 h after dosing in
the test without dialysis and for 72 h in the test with dialysis. In the test without dialysis, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 2.36 ± 0.53 µg/ml (mean ± standard deviation) and the time to Cmax was
9.00 ± 2.45 h. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) and area under the concentration-time
curve (AUC) were 16.95 ± 1.20 h and 69.05 ± 14.84 µg · h/ml, respectively. In the test with dialysis,
t1/2 during hemodialysis decreased
approximately to one-sixth of that obtained in the test without
dialysis, although t1/2 in the latter
elimination phase did not differ from that in the nondialysis test. AUC
was reduced to 43% of that in the test without dialysis. The
fractional removal of cefdinir by hemodialysis was 61%. These findings
indicate that clearance of cefdinir is prolonged in patients with renal
failure, and cefdinir is well removed by introduction of hemodialysis,
although t1/2 (during hemodialysis) and AUC
were two and eight times higher than the data previously reported for
healthy volunteers, respectively. The pharmacokinetic data suggest that
100 mg of oral cefdinir once a day would result in a sufficient
concentration in plasma in hemodialysis patients, but this remains to
be confirmed by multiple-dose studies.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cefdinir is a broad-spectrum oral
cephalosporin which is highly active against many gram-positive and
gram-negative bacteria (6, 11-14). The drug has been
launched in Japan and approved in the United States, the United
Kingdom, and other countries in Europe.
It is well known from clinical studies carried out so far that the
elimination of cephalosporin is significantly prolonged in patients
with impaired renal function, and the usual recommended dose for
hemodialysis patients is reported for each cephalosporin (1-5, 7,
8, 10, 18-20).
A previous study with healthy volunteers demonstrated that cefdinir is
excreted primarily by the kidney in an unchanged form (17).
Linear increases were observed in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time
curve (AUC) after a single oral dose of 50 to 200 mg of cefdinir.
Cmax, time to Cmax
(Tmax), AUC, and renal clearance (CL) did not
significantly differ between the first and last doses in the
multiple-dose study (17), and a steady-state trough of
concentration in plasma and urinary excretion were attained within 2 days. However, the pharmacokinetics of cefdinir in patients undergoing
hemodialysis have not been examined. The present study was carried out
with and without hemodialysis to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of
cefdinir after a single oral dose to patients with chronic renal
failure.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Subjects.
Six adult male hemodialysis patients aged 38 to 60 years and weighing 45.3 to 64.4 kg gave written informed consent to be included in this study. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee
of Shitoro Clinic. Serum creatinine concentrations ranged from 10.0 to
13.9 mg/dl, and urine output was less than 100 ml/day. Patients had
been on maintenance hemodialysis for 4 h three times a week for
more than 6 years (6 to 17 years). The dialyzer used was hollow fiber
cartridges with a 1.5-, 1.8-, or 2.0-m2 cuprammonium rayon
membrane. Flow rates were maintained at 200 and 500 ml/min for the
blood and dialysate, respectively, throughout the dialysis procedure.
Subjects who had a history of heart disease, hepatic disease, and
sensitivity to penicillin or cephalosporin were not included in this
study. Patients did not take any drug except insulin for diabetes
mellitus on days when the study was performed. The absence of hepatic
and hematological disease was confirmed by physical examination and
blood chemistry tests.
Study design.
The kinetic studies after single oral dosing
with 100 mg of cefdinir were carried out in patients with chronic renal
failure with and without hemodialysis for 4 h. Two tests were
performed separately 4 weeks apart, and the test without hemodialysis
was started first. Cefdinir was given 30 min after breakfast (601 kcal
of energy, 31 g of protein, 16.3 g of lipid, and 79 g of carbohydrate). Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (samples at 10 and 72 h were added in the
test with hemodialysis) after drug administration. In the test with
dialysis, hemodialysis was started 8 h after drug administration, since the median Tmax in the test without
dialysis was 8 h. Blood was centrifuged to separate the plasma,
and plasma was stored at
20°C until being assayed. The
concentrations of cefdinir in plasma were measured by high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) at Mitsubishi Kagaku Bio-Clinical
Laboratories, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Plasma (0.5 ml) was mixed with 1/15
M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0) (0.05 ml) with an internal
standard solution (0.05 ml) of ceftizoxime sodium. The mixture was
vortexed for 5 s with 1 M H3PO4 (0.4 ml).
The mixture solution (0.9 ml) was transferred to Bond Elut SCX (100 mg)
(GL Science, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 s and preconditioned with
methanol (0.2 ml), followed by distilled water (1.0 ml). The column was
washed by eluting with 0.01 N HCl (2 ml), followed by distilled water
(1.0 ml). Cefdinir was eluted from the column with 0.2 M
Na2HPO4 (1.0 ml). The eluent was collected in a
tube, and aliquots (50 µl) were applied to HPLC. An LC-6AD high-performance liquid chromatograph (Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped
with a spectrophotometric detector, SPD-10AV (Shimazu), was used. The
column, 25 cm long and 4.6 mm in inner diameter, was packed with TSKgel
ODS-80TM (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan). The mobile phase for cefdinir was
citrate buffer (pH 2.5)-acetonitril at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min, and
the effluent was monitored at 280 nm. The detection limit for cefdinir
was 0.05 µg/ml, and the coefficients of variation on samples of 0.05, 0.10, 1.001, and 5.005 µg of cefdinir per ml were 13.12, 13.84, 2.13, and 4.77%, respectively. The coefficients of day-to-day variation on
samples of 0.10, 1.001, and 5.005 µg/ml were 9.64, 2.27, and 4.75%,
respectively. Day-to-day precision was 1.03 to 6.27%.
Pharmacokinetic analysis.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were
calculated by a model-independent method. Cmax
and Tmax were determined by plasma
concentration-time data, and the elimination rate constant (
) was
determined by linear least-squares regression analysis. The terminal
elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as
ln 2/
. t1/2 during hemodialysis was
determined by data at 8, 10, and 12 h in the test with dialysis, and post-hemodialysis t1/2 was calculated from
plasma cefdinir concentrations at 12, 24, and 48 h.
Plasma cefdinir area under the concentration-time curve from time zero
to infinity (AUC0-
) was estimated by using the plasma
concentrations from time zero to the last time measured by the
trapezoidal rule for time zero to the last measurement and then
extrapolating to infinity by adding the last measured plasma
concentration divided by
.
The fractional removal of cefdinir (fd) by hemodialysis was calculated
by the equation fd = [1
t1/2(HD)/t1/2] × [1
exp (
0.603)/t1/2 (HD)] × 100, where t1/2 (HD) is t1/2
in the test with hemodialysis and t1/2 is
t1/2 in the test without dialysis.
During hemodialysis, cefdinir, creatinine, urea nitrogen levels, as
well as hematocrit, were determined in plasma from both
venous and
arterial lines. The hemodialysis CL of these items
was calculated by
the equation CL (ml/min) = QB [(
B
V)/
B]
(1

Ht), where QB is the dialyzer blood flow rate,
B
is the concentration
in plasma (µg/ml) in arterial lines,
V is the concentration in
plasma (µg/ml) in venous lines,
and Ht is hematocrit.
Statistical analysis.
Results are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD). For statistical comparisons, a paired
t test was used; a P value of less than 0.05 was
considered significant statistically.
 |
RESULTS |
The pharmacokinetic data for each patient is shown in Tables
1 through
3, and the mean plasma cefdinir
concentration-time curves in the tests with and without dialysis are
shown in Fig. 1. In the test without
dialysis, the mean Cmax of cefdinir was 2.36 ± 0.53 µg/ml and the mean Tmax was
9.00 ± 2.45 h, with a median Tmax of
8 h. The mean AUC0-
was 69.05 ± 14.84 µg · h/ml, and the mean t1/2 was
16.95 ± 1.2 h. The plasma cefdinir concentrations at 24 and
48 h after dosing were 1.29 ± 0.34 and 0.50 ± 0.12 µg/ml, respectively.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mean plasma cefdinir concentration-time profiles after a
single oral administration of 100 mg to hemodialysis patients with and
without hemodialysis.
|
|
In the test with dialysis, the mean Cmax of
cefdinir was 2.03 ± 0.54 µg/ml. No significant difference was
observed in the mean Cmax of cefdinir between
the tests with and without dialysis. The mean
t1/2 was 2.76 ± 1.01 h during 4 h of hemodialysis and 15.59 ± 2.42 h after hemodialysis. The
mean t1/2 during hemodialysis was significantly
less than that in the test without dialysis (P < 0.0001). In contrast, no significant difference was found between the
posthemodialysis t1/2 in the test with dialysis
and t1/2 in the test without dialysis. Mean
AUC0-
in the test with dialysis (30.18 ± 12.03 µg · h/ml) was significantly less than that in the test
without dialysis (P < 0.0001). The plasma cefdinir
concentrations at 24, 48, and 72 h were 0.52 ± 0.29, 0.16 ± 0.12 and 0.03 ± 0.03 µg/ml, respectively, and
those at 24 and 48 h were significantly lower than in the test
without dialysis (P < 0.001).
Hemodialysis CL of cefdinir was 75.7 ± 7.9 (68.1 to 85.6) ml/min.
The hemodialysis CL of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were
128.6 ± 5.8 and 105.0 ± 6.2 ml/min, respectively. The
fractional removal of cefdinir by hemodialysis was 61%.
Cefdinir was well tolerated by the hemodialysis patients. No
significant changes attributable to cefdinir were observed in laboratory test results or physical findings during this study.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, the pharmacokinetics of cefdinir were
examined in hemodialized patients with and without hemodialysis.
The pharmacokinetics of this drug in subjects with normal renal
function were evaluated in a previous study (16, 17). The
degree of protein binding was 73.1% ± 2.2% in normal human serum
(15). Following a single administration of 100 mg of
cefdinir, Cmax, Tmax,
t1/2, and AUC0-
of cefdinir were
0.79 ± 0.19 µg/ml, 4.3 ± 0.5 h, 1.48 ± 0.12 h, and 4.04 ± 0.72 µg · h/ml, respectively
(16). Renal CL in healthy subjects was 89.2 ± 6.0 ml/min, and 30.8% ± 8.2% of each administered dose was excreted unchanged in the urine during the first 24 h.
Since cefdinir is excreted primarily through the kidney, it is expected
that Cmax and AUC would be increased and
t1/2 prolonged in patients with renal
dysfunction. In this study, the mean Cmax and
the mean AUC of cefdinir in the test without dialysis increased to 3 and 17 times the respective values obtained previously with healthy
subjects (16), and Tmax and
t1/2 for these patients were prolonged to 2 and
11 times those for subjects with normal renal function.
The results of this study are in agreement with previous findings on
the other cephalosporins (1-5, 7, 8, 10, 18-20). For
example, Cmax and AUC of cefpodoxime proxetil,
cefixime, cefadroxil, and cefprozil in hemodialysis patients are
increased to 1.3 to 3 times and 2.4 to 10 times those in healthy
subjects, respectively. Tmax and
t1/2 are also prolonged, to 1.9 to 3 times and
2.6 to 18.3 times the respective values obtained in subjects with
normal renal function, except for the Tmax of
cefixime, which was not affected by the decrease in renal function.
AUC in the test with dialysis decreased from 69 µg · h/ml in
the test without dialysis to 30 µg · h/ml. This was effected by the removal of the drug through hemodialysis, since the
posthemodialysis t1/2 was almost the same as
that obtained in the test without dialysis. The hemodialysis CL of
cefdinir calculated from the blood flow rate and concentrations in
plasma of both arterial and venous lines was 76 ml/min during
hemodialysis. The hemodialysis CL of this drug was 72 and 59% of the
hemodialysis CL of creatinine and urea nitrogen, respectively. The
fractional removal of cefdinir by hemodialysis was 61%. These findings
indicate that cefdinir is well removed by hemodialysis.
t1/2 during 4 h of hemodialysis was
2.76 h, which was about one-sixth of that in the test without dialysis.
Hemodialysis significantly removed plasma cefdinir, but
t1/2 during hemodialysis was still two times
longer than that reported in subjects with normal renal function.
Moreover, AUC in the test with dialysis was still eight times higher
than in subjects with normal renal function. The plasma concentrations
of this drug at 24 and 48 h after the administration of 100 mg of
cefdinir in the test with dialysis were 0.52 ± 0.29 and 0.16 ± 0.12 µg/dl and were much higher than that observed at 12 h in
subjects with normal renal function (0.03 ± 0.02 µg/dl). These
data indicate the need for a reduction of the dose of cefdinir in
patients on hemodialysis.
The plasma cefdinir concentration (0.52 ± 0.29 µg/ml) at
24 h after the administration of 100 mg of cefdinir in the test
with dialysis was higher than this drug's reported MIC at which 80% of isolates were inhibited against clinical isolates of
Staphylococcus aureus (0.5 µg/ml), Streptococcus
pyogenes (
0.03 µg/ml), Haemophilus influenzae (0.5 µg/ml), and Escherichia coli (0.25 µg/ml)
(9). Since the dialysis clearance of cefdinir was evaluated
when the peak concentration of the drug was achieved, the fractional
drug removal observed in our study would be the highest that we have seen in clinical practice settings. Thus, we can expect a sufficient plasma cefdinir concentration with 100 mg of oral cefdinir once a day
in hemodialysis patients.
It is known that a transient increase in the concentration of drug
occurs following the end of hemodialysis. This rebound phenomenon
should be taken into account when we estimate the serum drug
concentration in multiple doses from the single-dose study. Unfortunately, we did not determine whether there was a rebound in the
plasma cefdinir concentration.
In conclusion, (i) t1/2 of cefdinir increases in
patients with chronic renal failure to 11 times that of healthy
controls; (ii) hemodialysis effectively removes cefdinir, and
t1/2 during hemodialysis decreases to one-sixth
of that in tests without dialysis but is still longer than in healthy
subjects; and (iii) 100 mg of cefdinir once a day is a sufficient dose
for hemodialysis patients.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: First Department
of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600 Handa-cho, Hamamatsu 431-31, Japan. Phone: 81-53-435-2261. Fax: 81-53-434-9447. E-mail: ahishida{at}hama-med.ac.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bailey, R. R.,
P. E. Gower, and C. H. Dash.
1970.
The effect of impairment of renal function and hemodialysis on serum and urine levels of cephalexin.
Postgrad. Med. J.
46:60-64.
|
| 2.
|
Barbhaiya, R. H.,
C. A. Knupp,
S. T. Forgue,
G. R. Matzke,
D. R. P. Guay, and K. A. Pittman.
1990.
Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in subjects with renal insufficiency.
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
48:268-276[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Berman, S. J.,
W. H. Boughton,
J. G. Sugihara,
E. G. C. Wong,
M. M. Sato, and A. W. Siemsen.
1978.
Pharmacokinetics of cefaclor in patients with end stage renal disease and during hemodialysis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
14:281-283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Borin, M. T.,
G. S. Hughes,
J. S. Kelloway,
B. E. Shapiro, and E. Halstenson.
1992.
Disposition of cefpodoxime proxetil in hemodialysis patients.
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
32:1038-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dhib, M.,
B. Moulin,
A. Leroy,
B. Hameau,
M. Godin,
R. Johannides, and J. P. Fillastre.
1991.
Relationship between renal function and disposition of oral cefixime.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
41:579-583.
|
| 6.
| Goto, S., M. Ogawa, Y. Kaneko, and S. Kuwahara.
1989. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of cefdinir, a new
oral cephalosporin. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 37(Suppl.
2):30-55.
|
| 7.
|
Guay, D. R. P.,
R. C. Meatherall,
G. K. Harding, and G. R. Brown.
1986.
Pharmacokinetics of cefixime (CL 284,635; FK 027) in healthy subjects and patients with renal insufficiency.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
30:485-490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Höffler, D.,
P. Koeppe,
M. Corcilius, and A. Przykink.
1990.
Cefpodoxime proxetil in patients with endstage renal failure on hemodialysis.
Infection
18:157-162[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hoshino, K.,
Y. Iwai,
H. Ida,
S. Hiyoshi,
S. Nakamura,
I. Seto, and Y. Yokota.
1996.
Susceptibilities of clinical isolates to oral cephems with aminothiazol.
Pharma Medica
14:149-157.
|
| 10.
|
Humbert, G.,
A. Leroy,
J. P. Fillastre, and M. Godin.
1979.
Pharmacokinetics of cefdroxil in normal subjects and in patients with renal insufficiency.
Chemotherapy
25:189-195[Medline].
|
| 11.
| Inoue, E., M. Inoue, and S. Mitsuhashi. 1989. In
vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of cefdinir. Chemotherapy
(Tokyo) 37(Suppl. 2):1-15.
|
| 12.
| Kato, N., Y. Muto, K. Watanabe, and K. Ueno. 1989. In vitro activity of cefdinir, a new oral cephalosporin, against
anaerobic bacteria. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 37(Suppl.
2):65-76.
|
| 13.
| Mine, Y., T. Kamimura, H. Sakamoto, S. Tawara, K. Hatano, and Y. Watanabe. 1989. In vitro antibacterial activity of
cefdinir, a new orally active cephalosporin. Chemotherapy (Tokyo)
37(Suppl. 2):100-121.
|
| 14.
| Nishino, T., K. Hatano, and E. Iwao. 1989. In vitro
and in vivo antibacterial activities of cefdinir, a new oral cephem
antibiotic. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 37(Suppl.
2):77-96.
|
| 15.
| Sakamoto, H., T. Hirose, S. Nakamoto, K. Hatano, and Y. Mine. 1989. Pharmacokinetics of cefdinir, a new oral
cephalosporin, in experimental animals. Chemotherapy (Tokyo)
37(Suppl. 2):165-178.
|
| 16.
| Shimada, K., and S. Oka. 1989. Effect of food on
bioavailability of cefdinir. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 37(Suppl.
2):246-256.
|
| 17.
| Shimada, K., A. Shishido, and M. Tsunoo. 1989. Phase I study of cefdinir. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 37(Suppl.
2):208-245.
|
| 18.
|
Shyu, W. C.,
K. A. Pittman,
R. B. Wilber,
G. R. Matzke, and R. H. Barbhaiya.
1991.
Pharmacokinetics of cefprozil in healthy subjects and patients with renal impairment.
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
31:362-371[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Spyker, D. A.,
L. L. Gober,
W. M. Scheld,
M. A. Sande, and W. K. Bolton.
1982.
Pharmacokinetics of cefaclor in renal failure: effects of multiple doses and hemodialysis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
21:278-281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
van Dalen, R.,
T. B. Vree,
A. M. Baars, and E. Termond.
1986.
Dosage adjustment for ceftazidime in patients with impaired renal function.
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
30:597-605[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 1998, p. 1718-1721, Vol. 42, No. 7
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.