Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 1998, p. 1726-1730, Vol. 42, No. 7
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis
to Chlorhexidine Gluconate Gel
M. F.
Lampe,*
L. M.
Ballweber, and
W. E.
Stamm
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Received 9 September 1997/Returned for modification 4 January
1998/Accepted 16 April 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
To identify topical antimicrobial preparations which may be
effective in preventing the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases, we examined the activity of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)
against Chlamydia trachomatis. Chlamydial elementary bodies were incubated with dilutions of CHG gel for various times from 0 to
120 min. An aliquot of each dilution was further diluted and was
inoculated onto McCoy cell monolayers in individual wells in a 96-well
microtiter plate. The cultures were incubated for 48 h, and the
chlamydial inclusions were stained and counted. CHG gel diluted
fourfold (0.0625% CHG) killed C. trachomatis serovar D,
and CHG gel diluted eightfold (0.0313% CHG) killed serovar F
immediately upon exposure. CHG gel diluted 16-fold (0.0156% CHG)
killed serovar D, and CHG gel diluted 32-fold (0.0078% CHG) killed
serovar F after 120 min of exposure. Alteration of the pH over the
range of from 4 to 8 did not significantly affect its activity. The
addition of 10% whole human blood decreased the CHG gel activity at 0 min but had no significant effect after 120 min of exposure. We
conclude that CHG gel may be effective topically against C. trachomatis at concentrations that can be used and under
conditions that are found in the female genital tract and that further
studies of its antimicrobial efficacy and toxicity in vivo are
warranted.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Given the lack of a vaccine or other
effective means of preventing most sexually transmitted diseases
(STDs), new approaches to prevention are urgently needed. One new
approach to reducing the transmission of Chlamydia
trachomatis and other STD pathogens would be the topical
application of antimicrobial agents intravaginally before sexual
contact. The goal would be to kill the STD pathogens, including
C. trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, human
immunodeficiency virus, human papillomavirus, herpes simplex virus, and
Trichomonas vaginalis, before infection is initiated and at
the same time avoid adverse effects on the normal flora. A successful
topical microbicide should also be nontoxic to the vaginal epithelium and should be able to be easily self-administered prior to sexual contact.
A number of topical microbicides, including nonoxynol-9 (2,
6), chlorhexidine (7), defensins, and protegrins
(12), have been examined for their in vitro effects on
Chlamydia and other STD pathogens (8).
Chlorhexidine (1, 9) is a cationic antiseptic that has been
used extensively in hospitals, mostly for disinfection of skin and
mucous membranes. It is a member of the bis-biguanide family and has
broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against all bacteria and against
yeast and fungi. The positively charged chlorhexidine molecule is
thought to interact initially with the negatively charged cell
membrane. This interaction is followed by damage to the cell's
cytoplasmic membrane, resulting in leakage of the cytoplasmic contents.
Additionally, chlorhexidine has been examined extensively for host
toxicity and has been found to be safe (9). It has no
systemic side effects and low carcinogenic and mutagenic activities.
Given its low toxicity and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity,
chlorhexidine thus has potential as a vaginal microbicide.
C. trachomatis is an atypical gram-negative bacterium that
has evolved a biphasic life cycle that facilitates its efficient transmission. The bacterium infects the columnar epithelial cells of
the human genital and respiratory tracts and replicates within these
cells in membrane-bound inclusions in a form designated the reticulate
body. When the infected host cell has been depleted of its nutrients by
the newly replicated bacteria, the bacterium changes its morphology to
that of the infectious, metabolically inactive form designated the
elementary body (EB). EBs are released from the depleted infected cell
and either can infect adjacent cells or can be transmitted to
uninfected individuals through sexual contact. The EB surface contains
several cysteine-rich proteins that provide rigidity to the cell wall
through intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds (3). Even
though the bacterium does not produce peptidoglycan, its cell wall is
sufficiently strengthened by these sulfhydryl bonds such that the
organism is resistant to environmental degradation. If the organism in its EB form can be killed with a topical microbicide before it infects
the target columnar epithelial cell, the chlamydial infectious process
would be blocked. In one evaluation, chlamydial EBs were sensitive to
chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) (7), but whether they can be
killed by CHG formulated in a topical gel has not been examined. In the
studies reported here, we examined the in vitro susceptibility of
C. trachomatis to CHG in a gel.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chlamydia strains.
Two standard strains of
C. trachomatis were used in these studies, including strains
of serovars D (strain UW-3/Cx) and F (strain UW-6/Cx). These strains
were propagated in McCoy mouse fibroblast cells (ATCC CRL 1696),
purified on Renografin density gradients (4), and stored at
70°C in SPG (219 mM sucrose, 3.8 mM KH2PO4,
8.6 mM Na2HPO4, 4.9 mM glutamic acid [pH
7.0]) (5) until needed. Their serotypes were confirmed with
monoclonal antibodies by an inclusion typing method prior to use
(11).
Antimicrobial agents.
CHG (0.25%) was added to a
water-based gel composed of methylparaben, glucono-
-lactone, sodium
hydroxide, propylene glycol, glycerin, and hydroxyethyl cellulose with
no other antimicrobial compounds and was provided by the manufacturer
(Johnson and Johnson, Raritan, N.J.). Placebo gel containing no CHG was
also provided for testing of antichlamydial activity. Penicillin G and
polymyxin B sulfate were purchased as powders from Sigma Chemical Co.
(St. Louis, Mo.) and were prepared as sterile stock solutions in SPG or
tissue culture medium on the day of assay.
Antimicrobial assays.
Three assays were carried out to
examine the susceptibility of C. trachomatis to the CHG gel,
including assays for determination of the preinoculation minimal cidal
concentration (MCC), the preinoculation MCC in the presence of human
blood, and the preinoculation MCC at different pH values.
Preinoculation MCC.
One day prior to the assay for the
preinoculation MCC, 9 × 104 antibiotic-free McCoy
cells were added to individual wells in a 96-well microtiter plate and
the plate was incubated for 24 h to permit the cells to form a
confluent monolayer. To mimic topical killing action, we exposed the
Chlamydia to the antimicrobial prior to inoculation. A total
of 106 C. trachomatis serovar D or F
inclusion-forming units (IFU) in SPG were added to equal volumes of
dilutions of CHG gel or dilutions of polymyxin B-positive or penicillin
G-negative control antibiotic solutions for 0, 30, 60, 90, or 120 min.
Undiluted CHG gel had an initial concentration of 0.25% CHG. However,
since the undiluted gel was too viscous to ensure proper mixing, it was
diluted twofold in SPG before the organisms were added, further
diluting the gel fourfold. Thus, the first test concentration contained
0.0625% CHG, as indicated in Fig. 1 to 3. The separate polymyxin
B-positive control or penicillin G-negative control each had an initial
test concentration of 1,000 µg of drug per ml after addition of the organism. After each time period, a 5-µl aliquot of the organism and
drug mixture was added to 195 µl of SPG. A 100-µl aliquot of this
dilution was then added to the McCoy cell monolayer in a 96-well
microtiter plate, and the plate was centrifuged at 1,200 × g for 1 h to inoculate the tissue culture cells.
Unbound organisms in drug were removed, and 200 µl of antibiotic-free
Eagle's minimal essential medium (EMEM) plus 10% fetal calf serum and
0.5 µg of cyclohexamide per ml were added. The cultures were
incubated for 48 h, the cells were fixed and stained with the
genus-specific fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled monoclonal antibody
CF2 (10), and the inclusions were counted and any toxicity
was noted. The lowest concentration of CHG gel which showed 100%
killing was defined as the MCC. All assays were performed in
triplicate, three fields per well were counted, the inclusion counts
were averaged, and a polymyxin B-positive control and penicillin
G-negative control were run in parallel. Two additional wells
inoculated with either the C. trachomatis organisms with no
drug (organism control) or SPG only were also included to monitor
normal inclusion formation and McCoy cell morphology. Percent killing
in tests with CHG gel, the polymyxin B-positive control, and the
penicillin G-negative control were calculated by the following formula:
[(mean IFU of organism control
mean IFU of test)/mean IFU of
organism control]100. Placebo gel alone with no CHG was also tested
for its antichlamydial activity by this protocol. A level of 100%
killing represents a decrease of at least 10
4 organisms,
from the original 106 IFU in the inoculum to 160 IFU, the
minimum number of IFU which can be counted in our assay.
Preinoculation MCCs in the presence of human blood.
We also
examined the effect of human blood on the MCCs using the same
preinoculation method described above, with the exception that 10%
human blood at pH 7.0 was added to the CHG gel and the organism control
dilutions. Polymyxin B-positive control and penicillin G-negative
control dilutions were run in the absence of human blood at pH 7.0. Blood was collected from one of the authors, who was not receiving
antibiotics and who has no antichlamydial antibodies. Whole blood was
collected in tubes containing sodium citrate, an anticoagulant
generally used for routine bacteriologic blood cultures, and was stored
at 4°C, and the MCC assays were performed within 1 week of blood
collection.
Preinoculation MCCs at different pH values.
In addition, we
examined the effect of different pH values on the MCCs using the same
preinoculation method described above, except that the SPG pH was
adjusted to 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 with 1 M Na2HPO4
or 1 M KH2PO4 before the C. trachomatis IFU were added. The percent killing by the CHG gel at
each different pH value was derived by comparison of the IFU to the
organism control IFU at that same pH.
Cell toxicity assay.
The fluorometric and colorimetric
growth indicator alamarBlue (Alamar Biosciences, Inc., Sacramento,
Calif.) was used to ensure that the CHG gel, diluted 40-fold in the
preinoculation MCC protocol, did not cause toxicity to the McCoy cells.
A total of 100 µl of each diluted drug mixture was added to three
wells containing a McCoy cell monolayer for 1 h, and the drug
mixture was then replaced with 200 µl of EMEM with cycloheximide.
After 48 h of incubation, 20 µl of alamarBlue was added to each
well, the plates were incubated for an additional 6 h, and the
absorbance values at 570 and 600 nm were determined. Dilutions of
phosphate buffered saline in SPG were used as negative cell controls,
and wells with no cells were used as positive controls. The percent
inhibition of McCoy cells compared to that of EMEM-negative controls
was calculated by the following formula: 100 × {[(mean
OD570
mean OD600 of negative cell control)
(mean OD570
mean OD600 of test)]/(mean
OD570
mean OD600 of negative cell
control)}, where OD570 is the optical density at 570 nm.
 |
RESULTS |
Preinoculation MCC.
To closely mimic the topical action of an
ideal microbicide, we developed the preinoculation MCC assay described
in Materials and Methods in which C. trachomatis was
directly exposed to the antimicrobial agent before inoculation of the
organisms onto McCoy cells. Using this assay, we found that CHG gel
diluted 4- or 8-fold killed both C. trachomatis serovars
(Fig. 1) immediately upon exposure and
CHG gel diluted to 16- or 32-fold killed both serovars after 120 min of
exposure. There was little variation between serovars in the degree of
susceptibility to the CHG gel (Fig. 1). Using this method, we saw no
visible toxicity to the cultured McCoy cells. The use of gel alone
containing no CHG resulted in no killing of Chlamydia (Fig.
1).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Killing of C. trachomatis serovars D and F
preexposed to CHG gel for 0 or 120 min. Tests were also performed at
time periods of 30, 60, and 90 min, but only the values obtained at 0 and 120 min are indicated. The values from tests with the controls
polymyxin B, penicillin G, and placebo gel with no CHG at 120 min are
also indicated. The initial test concentrations of polymyxin B and
penicillin G were 1,000 µg/ml.
|
|
Preinoculation MCCs in the presence of human blood.
Because we
were concerned that blood normally found during the menstrual cycle
might alter the activity or duration of a vaginal microbicide, we
carried out a preinoculation MCC assay in the presence of 10% human
blood at 0 and 120 min after exposure. We found that the presence of
blood decreased the CHG gel activity at 0 min but had no effect after
120 min of C. trachomatis exposure (Fig.
2). The anticoagulant sodium citrate was
not a factor in this assay because the organism control was also
preexposed to 10% whole human blood in the absence of CHG.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Killing of C. trachomatis serovar D by CHG
gel at pH 7 in the presence and absence of 10% whole human blood.
Organism controls were tested at pH 7.0 in the presence and absence of
10% whole human blood and were used to calculate the percent killing
under each condition. Polymyxin B and penicillin G were tested at pH
7.0 without blood.
|
|
Preinoculation MCCs at different pH values.
Because the pH of
the vagina can vary from pH 4 in healthy women to pH 5 to 6 in women
with bacterial vaginosis, pH 7 in women who are postmenopausal or
bleeding, and pH 8 after semen is deposited, we examined the effect of
pH on the preinoculation MCCs. Assays were performed in SPG preadjusted
with 1 M Na2HPO4 or 1 M
KH2PO4 to pH 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 before the
C. trachomatis inoculum was added. As can be seen in Fig.
3, altering the pH did not significantly affect the MCCs when the organisms were exposed to the pH-adjusted CHG
gel for 120 min.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Killing of C. trachomatis serovar D after 120 min of exposure to CHG gel adjusted to different pH values. Polymyxin B
and penicillin G were tested at pH 7.0 only, but all organism controls
were run at each pH and were used to calculate the percent killing at
that pH.
|
|
Cell toxicity assay.
To directly measure toxicity not visible
microscopically in the preinoculation MCC assay, we determined the
percent inhibition of McCoy cells exposed to CHG gel using the
oxidation-reduction indicator alamarBlue (Table
1). We found insignificant inhibition of
the cells by the first dilution of CHG gel (8.5% inhibition). Once the
CHG gel had been further diluted, no cell culture toxicity over that
seen with the phosphate-buffered saline control was observed (Table 1).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our goal in these studies was to identify a topical compound that
has antimicrobial activity against C. trachomatis, an
important STD pathogen. CHG prepared as a gel for topical use has been
shown to be broadly active as an antimicrobial agent and has been shown to be nontoxic. In the studies reported here, we showed that CHG gel is
active against C. trachomatis when the organisms are exposed before inoculation onto the cell culture system. CHG gel diluted at
least four- to eightfold was immediately active against both C. trachomatis serovars tested. In actual use, at least an
approximate twofold dilution of CHG gel would be expected since the
typical volume of vaginal fluid is 3.5 ml, close to the amount of CHG gel that could be applied vaginally in humans. Upon application, CHG
gel would immediately be active and would be minimally diluted, but
with time and sexual activity, its concentration would decrease. We
found, however, that at times of exposure of up to 120 min, the CHG gel
is active at a dilution of 16- or 32-fold. Furthermore, the CHG gel
remained active against both C. trachomatis serovars tested,
demonstrating that it is most likely broadly antichlamydial. The
killing activity of the CHG gel was due to the CHG since the gel alone
had no antichlamydial activity.
The antimicrobial activities of topical microbicides applied vaginally
may be affected by menstrual blood or the vaginal pH. It has been shown
that chlorhexidine activity is decreased or eliminated by serum
(9). To examine its antichlamydial activity under various
conditions that might be found in the vagina, we tested CHG gel
activity against C. trachomatis in the presence of whole blood or at different pH values. Under the conditions of our
assay, the killing of C. trachomatis by the CHG gel
decreased in the presence of whole human blood at 0 min but was
unaffected at 120 min. Similarly, altering the preinoculation pH from 4 to 8 did not affect the antichlamydial activity of the CHG gel. Thus, the antichlamydial activity of CHG gel was present under conditions that might commonly be encountered in the human vagina. Our results, showing that the antichlamydial activity of CHG is not affected by
whole blood, differ from the previously reported finding that chlorhexidine activity is decreased by exposure to serum
(9). In the previous studies, however, chlorhexidine stock
solutions and not CHG gel were examined.
Our results show that the cationic detergent CHG in the CHG gel is able
to prevent chlamydial infection in vitro. This finding is not
surprising since chlorhexidine has previously been shown to have
antichlamydial activity (7). However, our findings may have
practical implications. We have shown that CHG gel is active against
C. trachomatis. An examination of its activity against other
STD pathogens such as N. gonorrhoeae and human
immunodeficiency virus is warranted. CHG gel is already formulated as a
viscous gel that would stay in the vagina for hours, thus remaining in place long enough to provide protection when it is instilled shortly before sexual contact.
In summary, we have shown that CHG gel is active against C. trachomatis, resulting in 100% killing immediately at a 4- to 8-fold dilution and after 120 min at a 16- to 32-fold dilution. The
antichlamydial activity of CHG gel is not affected by the presence of
human blood at 120 min or alteration of the pH from 4 to 8. We thus
conclude that CHG gel may be an effective topical antimicrobial agent
at concentrations that can be used and under conditions that are found
in the vagina. Further work to test its activity against other STD
pathogens such as N. gonorrhoeae and human immunodeficiency
virus are warranted. Furthermore, CHG gel should be examined for its
toxicity to vaginal and cervical tissues both in an animal model and in
humans. Our results are consistent with the concept that antimicrobial
compounds can be developed or identified, which, when self-administered
intravaginally, can prevent acquisition of STDs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants
AI-39061 and AI-31448 from the National Institutes of Health.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medicine, Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Box 356523, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. Phone: (206) 616 4124. Fax: (206) 616 4898. E-mail: lampe{at}u.washington.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
al Tannir, M. A., and H. S. Goodman.
1994.
A review of chlorhexidine and its use in special populations.
Spec. Care Dentist.
14:116-122[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Benes, S., and W. M. McCormack.
1985.
Inhibition of growth of Chlamydia trachomatis by nonoxynol-9 in vitro.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
27:724-726[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Hatch, T. P.,
I. Allan, and J. H. Pearce.
1984.
Structural and polypeptide differences between envelopes of infective and reproductive life cycle forms of Chlamydia spp.
J. Bacteriol.
157:13-20[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Howard, L.,
N. S. Orenstein, and N. W. King.
1974.
Purification on Renografin density gradients of Chlamydia trachomatis grown in the yolk sac of eggs.
Appl. Microbiol.
27:102-106[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Jackson, E. B., and J. E. Smadel.
1951.
Immunization against scrub typhus. II. Preparation of lyophilized living vaccine.
Am. J. Hyg.
53:326-331.
|
| 6.
|
Kelly, J. P.,
R. B. Reynolds,
S. Stagno,
W. C. Louv, and W. J. Alexander.
1985.
In vitro activity of the spermicide nonoxynol-9 against Chlamydia trachomatis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
27:760-762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
| Lyons, J. M., and J. I. J. Ito.
1995. Reducing the risk of Chlamydia trachomatis genital
tract infection by evaluating the prophylactic potential of vaginally
applied chemicals. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21(Suppl.
2):S174-S177.
|
| 8.
|
Qu, X. D.,
S. S. Harwig,
A. M. Oren,
W. M. Shafer, and R. I. Lehrer.
1996.
Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to protegrins.
Infect. Immun.
64:1240-1245[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Russell, A. D., and M. J. Day.
1993.
Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine.
J. Hosp. Infect.
25:229-238[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Stamm, W. E.,
M. Tam,
M. Koester, and L. Cles.
1983.
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
17:666-668[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Suchland, R. J., and W. E. Stamm.
1991.
Simplified microtiter cell culture method for rapid immunotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:1333-1338[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Yasin, B.,
S. S. L. Harwig,
R. I. Lehrer, and E. A. Wagar.
1996.
Susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis to protegrins and defensins.
Infect. Immun.
64:709-713[Abstract].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 1998, p. 1726-1730, Vol. 42, No. 7
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Yamazaki, T., Kishimoto, T., Shiga, S., Sato, K., Hagiwara, T., Inoue, M., Sasaki, N., Ouchi, K., Hara, Y.
(2005). Biosynthesized Tea Polyphenols Inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 2501-2503
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamano, H., Yamazaki, T., Sato, K., Shiga, S., Hagiwara, T., Ouchi, K., Kishimoto, T.
(2005). In Vitro Inhibitory Effects of Hinokitiol on Proliferation of Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 2519-2521
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lampe, M. F., Rohan, L. C., Skinner, M. C., Stamm, W. E.
(2004). Susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis to Excipients Commonly Used in Topical Microbicide Formulations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3200-3202
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ballweber, L. M., Jaynes, J. E., Stamm, W. E., Lampe, M. F.
(2002). In Vitro Microbicidal Activities of Cecropin Peptides D2A21 and D4E1 and Gel Formulations Containing 0.1 to 2% D2A21 against Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 34-41
[Abstract]
[Full Text]