Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1998, p. 1900-1905, Vol. 42, No. 8
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effect of Growth Rate on Resistance of
Candida albicans Biofilms to Antifungal Agents
George S.
Baillie and
L. Julia
Douglas*
Division of Infection and Immunity, Institute
of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12
8QQ, United Kingdom
Received 22 December 1997/Returned for modification 29 January
1998/Accepted 18 May 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
A perfused biofilm fermentor, which allows growth-rate control of
adherent microbial populations, was used to assess whether the
susceptibility of Candida albicans biofilms to antifungal agents is dependent on growth rate. Biofilms were generated under conditions of glucose limitation and were perfused with drugs at a high
concentration (20 times the MIC). Amphotericin B produced a greater
reduction in the number of daughter cells in biofilm eluates than
ketoconazole, fluconazole, or flucytosine. Similar decreases in
daughter cell counts were observed when biofilms growing at three
different rates were perfused with amphotericin B. In a separate series
of experiments, intact biofilms, resuspended biofilm cells, and newly
formed daughter cells were removed from the fermentor and were exposed
to a lower concentration of amphotericin B for 1 h. The
susceptibility profiles over a range of growth rates were then compared
with those obtained for planktonic cells grown at the same rates under
glucose limitation in a chemostat. Intact biofilms were resistant to
amphotericin B at all growth rates tested, whereas planktonic cells
were resistant only at low growth rates (
0.13 h
1).
Cells resuspended from biofilms were less resistant than intact biofilm populations but more resistant than daughter cells; the susceptibilities of both these cell types were largely independent of
growth rate. Our findings indicate that the amphotericin B resistance
of C. albicans biofilms is not simply due to a low growth rate but depends on some other feature of the biofilm mode of
growth.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Candida albicans is
the major fungal pathogen of humans (7, 25).
During the last decade this organism, together with closely related
Candida species, has become one of the commonest agents of
hospital-acquired infection (16). The evolution of these fungi, previously considered to be of low virulence, into important nosocomial pathogens is related to specific risk factors associated with modern medical therapeutics. These include the use of
broad-spectrum antibacterial antibiotics, hyperalimentation, cancer
chemotherapy, immunosuppression following organ transplantation, and
surgical procedures resulting in prolonged, intensive care unit
hospitalization.
Implants, particularly indwelling intravascular catheters,
represent another very significant risk factor and are almost
invariably associated with nosocomial Candida infections.
These devices can become colonized by microorganisms which form a
biofilm of cells embedded within a matrix of extracellular material
(5, 6, 9). Detachment of organisms from the biofilm often
results in a septicemia which may be responsive to drug therapy.
However, the biofilm itself is resistant both to antimicrobial agents
and to host defense mechanisms and so constitutes a continuing source of infection. As a result, implant-associated infections are difficult to resolve, and usually the implant must be removed (18,
27).
Recently, a model system was devised for studying Candida
biofilms growing on the surfaces of small discs of catheter
material (19-21). Growth of the biofilms was monitored
quantitatively by dry weight measurements and by colorimetric or
radioisotope assays. With this system, biofilm formation by 15 different isolates of C. albicans and a number of other
Candida species was investigated (19). Scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the biofilms of C. albicans consisted of a dense network of yeasts, hyphae, and
pseudohyphae, together with a matrix material whose synthesis increased
dramatically when developing biofilms were subjected to a liquid flow
(21). The biofilms were resistant to the actions of five
clinically important antifungal agents, including amphotericin B and
fluconazole (20).
The mechanisms by which Candida biofilms resist the actions
of antifungal agents are not known. One possible resistance mechanism is related to the slow growth rate of biofilm cells as a result of the
limited availability of key nutrients, particularly at the base of the
biofilm. Growth rate is one of the major differences between
planktonic (dispersed) growth of microorganisms in enriched laboratory media and biofilm growth in natural environments
(3). A slow growth rate is frequently associated with the
adoption of a different phenotype by microorganisms. With many
bacteria, for example, changes in growth rate are accompanied by
changes in cell envelope composition (12), and these, in
turn, affect the susceptibility of the bacteria to antimicrobial
agents. Growth rate may therefore be an important modulator of drug
activity in biofilms (3, 4). To investigate this possibility
with C. albicans, in the present study we used a
perfused biofilm fermentor (17) to generate
Candida biofilms at different growth rates. We then compared
the susceptibility of the biofilm organisms to amphotericin B with that
of planktonic cells grown at the same rates in a conventional
chemostat.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Organism.
C. albicans GDH 2346, isolated at
Glasgow Dental Hospital from a patient with denture stomatitis, was
used in all experiments. It was maintained on slopes of Sabouraud
dextrose agar (Difco) and was subcultured monthly. Every 2 months
cultures were replaced by new ones freshly grown from freeze-dried
stocks.
Growth medium.
The growth medium used throughout this study
was yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (pH 5.4; Difco) prepared
from individual constituents. A limiting glucose concentration of 4 mM
was selected; this concentration allowed batch growth of C. albicans to a stationary-phase optical density of 1.3 at 540 nm.
Growth of planktonic cells in continuous culture.
Conventional (planktonic) continuous cultures were established at
37°C in a 1-liter glass chemostat (500 Series; LH Fermentation, Reading, United Kingdom) with a working volume of 750 ml. The medium in
the vessel was prewarmed for 1 h before inoculation with a batch
culture of C. albicans (20 ml) in the exponential phase
of growth. The cells were allowed to grow batchwise until the late
exponential phase. Medium flow was then initiated, and the production
of a steady state was monitored by determining the optical density of
the outflow at 540 nm. Air was pumped through the culture at a rate of
1 liter min
1, and the pH was maintained at a value of
between 5.2 and 5.6. The dissolved oxygen in the medium was controlled
by the stirring speed (routinely, 250 rpm) and was kept at 80 to 100%
saturation. Cultures were tested daily for yeast morphology and
bacterial contamination. At steady state, the growth rate (µ) equals
the dilution rate (D). Values for D were
calculated according to the equation D = F/V, where
F is the flow rate of the medium and V is the
volume of the culture in the vessel.
Growth of biofilms.
Biofilms of C. albicans
were grown on cellulose acetate filters in a perfused biofilm fermentor
as described by Gilbert et al. (17) for Escherichia
coli. A portion (10 ml) of an overnight shake culture of
C. albicans was added to fresh prewarmed medium (40 ml)
and was incubated at 37°C in an orbital shaker at 60 rpm for 3 h
until the exponential growth phase had been reached (an optical density
of approximately 1 at 540 nm). The cells (4.5 × 108 ± 0.6 × 108 [standard error {SE}]) were
collected by pressure filtration on a cellulose acetate membrane
(0.2-µm pore size; 47-mm diameter; Whatman), and the membrane was
inverted into the base of a perfused biofilm fermentor. Fresh medium
was passed into the fermentation chamber at controlled flow rates (18 to 138 ml h
1) via a peristaltic pump. A hydrostatic head
develops above the membrane filter and under steady-state conditions
perfuses the filter at the rate of medium addition to the vessel
(17). The eluate passing through the filter was collected at
various time intervals, and viable counts were made by serial dilution
in 0.15 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) and plating in triplicate on Sabouraud dextrose agar. The plates were incubated at 37°C for
16 h before counting. This gave an estimate of the numbers of
newly formed daughter cells. Growth rates of biofilms (divisions hour
1) were calculated by dividing the number of daughter
cells produced per hour at steady state by the estimated adherent cell
population (determined by obtaining the viable counts of the
resuspended biofilms). All biofilms were grown for at least 20 h
under steady-state conditions before drug treatment.
SEM.
The freeze-drying procedure of Hawser et al.
(21) was used. Biofilms formed on cellulose acetate filters
were removed from the fermentor and were fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol)
glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.0). The filters were
washed gently three times with distilled water and were then plunged
into a liquid propane-isopentane mixture (2:1; vol/vol) at
196°C
before freeze-drying under vacuum (10
6 Torr). Pieces of
each filter were mounted on aluminum stubs and coated with gold before
they were viewed under a Philips 500 scanning electron microscope.
Perfusion of biofilms with antifungal agents.
The
susceptibilities of C. albicans biofilms to
amphotericin B (Sigma), flucytosine (Sigma), fluconazole (Pfizer), and
ketoconazole (Janssen) were tested by perfusing adherent cell
populations with yeast nitrogen base medium containing the drugs. Stock
solutions of these antifungal agents were prepared as described
previously (20). When the biofilms had reached steady state
(3 h) at a growth rate of approximately 0.2 h
1, medium
containing a high concentration of the test drug (20 times the MIC) was
pumped into the vessel for a further 3 h. The MICs used were those
previously determined (20) for C. albicans GDH 2346 (amphotericin B, 1.3 µg ml
1; flucytosine, 0.2 µg ml
1; fluconazole, 0.4 µg ml
1;
ketoconazole, 0.025 µg ml
1). At intervals, the number
of viable daughter cells in the perfusate was determined by serial
dilution and plating onto Sabouraud dextrose agar.
Susceptibility of planktonic cells to amphotericin B.
Steady-state cultures from a conventional chemostat were used.
Preliminary experiments were carried out to determine the concentration of amphotericin B which gave an appropriate survival rate following a
1-h contact period. Cells were grown at a rate of 0.23 h
1, which represented a value toward the middle of the
growth-rate range tested later. Samples of culture (100 µl;
approximately 2 × 107 CFU ml
1) were
removed directly from the chemostat and were added to prewarmed distilled water (9.9 ml) containing various concentrations of amphotericin B. These test mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and then viable counts were made by serial dilution and plating in
triplicate on Sabouraud dextrose agar. The plates were incubated at
37°C for 16 h before counting. Figures for percent survival were
calculated by using the counts for untreated control samples processed
similarly. An amphotericin B concentration of 0.1 µg ml
1 gave a reduction in viability of over 80% with these
planktonic cells. This concentration of amphotericin B was used in
subsequent experiments in which the susceptibilities of cells grown in
the chemostat at rates up to 0.7 h
1 were tested by the
same procedure.
Susceptibilities of biofilm cells to amphotericin B.
The
susceptibilities of biofilm cells, resuspended biofilm cells, and newly
formed daughter cells to amphotericin B were tested by the method of
Evans et al. (15), as follows. After growth of the organism
in the perfused biofilm fermentor at rates up to 0.7 h
1,
cellulose acetate filters with adherent biofilms were removed from the
apparatus and cut in half. One half of each filter was immersed in
amphotericin B solution (0.1 µg ml
1; 10 ml) for 1 h at 37°C, and the adherent cells were then resuspended by vigorous
shaking for 10 min. The cells on the other half of the filter were
first resuspended by shaking in sterile water (10 ml) in an identical
fashion, samples of the suspension (100 µl; approximately 2 × 106 CFU ml
1) were added to an amphotericin B
solution (9.9 ml; final concentration, 0.1 µg ml
1), and
the mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Samples of the
perfusate (1 ml) containing newly formed daughter cells (approximately 2 × 105 CFU ml
1) were also added to an
amphotericin B solution (9 ml; final concentration, 0.1 µg
ml
1) and were incubated similarly for 1 h. Viable
counts were made for all samples by serial dilution in 0.15 M
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) and plating in triplicate on
Sabouraud dextrose agar. The plates were incubated at 37°C for
16 h before the colonies were counted. Values of percent survival
were calculated by using counts for untreated control samples processed
similarly. Colony counts for control samples before and after the 1-h
incubation period showed only very small increases in cell numbers.
 |
RESULTS |
Growth of C. albicans biofilms using a perfused
biofilm fermentor.
Controlled biofilm growth was produced
with a perfused biofilm fermentor in which a biofilm is formed on
the underside of a cellulose acetate membrane inserted into the
base of the vessel. The membrane is perfused with medium from the
sterile side. A steady state is developed when the size of the
biofilm population remains constant and dispersed cells are
collected in the spent medium. At steady state, the rate of perfusion
with fresh medium controls the overall growth rate of the culture
(17).
Since studies of fungal biofilms with a perfused biofilm fermentor have
not been reported previously, a preliminary investigation of
the suitability of this technique for work with C. albicans was performed. Exponential-phase organisms growing in
yeast nitrogen base medium containing a limiting glucose
concentration (4 mM) were collected on a prewashed cellulose
acetate membrane filter (0.2-µm pore size). The cell-impregnated
membrane was then inverted and was carefully placed in the base of the
fermentor, which was maintained at 37°C with a water jacket.
Initially, all filters were perfused at a rate of 1.12 ml
min
1. Eluate passing through the filter was periodically
collected, and viable counts were determined by serial dilution and
plating. Loosely attached cells were dislodged from the membrane by the perfusing medium for up to 80 min after the initiation of flow (Fig.
1); this also occurs with bacterial
biofilms (17). More than 90% of the cells added to the
filter were removed during this period. After the initial cell loss,
organisms were eluted from the filter at a constant rate. These
represent newly formed daughter cells budding from the biofilm. Steady
state could be maintained for approximately 30 h, after which the
organism appeared to grow through the cellulose acetate support. The
mean population size of a C. albicans biofilm was
3.5 × 107 ± 0.3 × 107 (SE) cells,
which represented 7.8% of the cell number originally added to the
membrane (4.5 × 108 cells). As expected,
C. albicans biofilms contained fewer organisms than
those of E. coli or Staphylococcus epidermidis
(108 and 109, respectively) (10, 17)
due to their greater cell size. Consequently, the number of daughter
cells shed from the biofilm during steady state was also reduced
compared with the number of cells shed from bacterial systems.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Elution of C. albicans from a cellulose
acetate filter perfused with medium in the biofilm fermentor at a rate
of 1.12 ml min 1. Organisms eluted during the initial 80 min correspond to loosely attached cells. Thereafter, newly formed
daughter cells are eluted under steady-state conditions. The results
are from a representative experiment repeated at least three times.
|
|
In subsequent experiments, the rate of flow of fresh medium through the
biofilm was altered after steady state had been reached,
and the number
of viable cells in the eluate was estimated 24
h later. As in a
conventional chemostat, increasing the medium
flow rate and hence the
availability of the limiting nutrient
resulted in a greater yield of
newly formed daughter cells. This
was demonstrated up to a flow rate of
1.7 ml min
1 (the critical medium flow rate), above which
the production of
daughter cells decreased and growth rate control
under steady-state
conditions was lost (Fig.
2). Calculation of specific growth rates
for different medium flow rates showed that there was a significant
correlation (
r = 0.85) between the two (Fig.
3). As expected,
the maximum specific
growth rate (µ
max) of 0.70 h
1 was reached
at the critical medium flow rate (1.7 ml min
1), after
which there was a decrease. This value is comparable
to that obtained
for µ
max with the same strain under steady-state
conditions in a conventional chemostat (0.73 h
1),
suggesting that the entire adherent population is under growth
rate
control.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Determination of the critical medium flow rate for a
C. albicans biofilm in the perfused biofilm fermentor.
The number of daughter cells released from the biofilm increased with
flow up to 1.7 ml min 1. This represents the critical
medium flow rate at which the growth rate is maximum
(µmax). The results are from a typical experiment
repeated at least three times.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Relationship between flow rate and growth rate for a
C. albicans biofilm in the perfused biofilm fermentor
up to the critical medium flow rate (1.7 ml min 1).
|
|
SEM.
Scanning electron micrographs of steady-state biofilms on
filters revealed a complex mixture of yeasts and hyphae enmeshed in a
dense matrix material (Fig. 4). Each
biofilm consisted mainly of a cell monolayer, but in some areas
biofilms were three cells deep. There were also small regions where the
underlying filter could be seen due to the complete absence of cells
(Fig. 4).

View larger version (223K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Scanning electron micrograph of a C. albicans biofilm grown on a cellulose acetate filter in a perfused
biofilm fermentor. The growth rate was 0.2 h 1. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|
Perfusion of biofilms with antifungal agents.
Initially, the
susceptibilities of the C. albicans biofilms to
antifungal agents were assessed by perfusing the biofilms with the
drugs. Four agents in common clinical use were added separately to the
growth medium at a high concentration (20 times the MIC) and were
allowed to perfuse steady-state biofilms maintained at a growth
rate of approximately 0.2 h
1. Ketoconazole appeared to be
more effective than either fluconazole or flucytosine at reducing
the number of viable daughter cells in the eluate (Fig.
5), but the differences were not
statistically significant. Exposure to amphotericin B for 1 h
resulted in a decrease in the viable count from 3.2 × 104 to 1.6 × 102 CFU ml
1;
after 225 min, no viable cells were detected in the eluate (Fig. 5).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Perfusion of C. albicans biofilms with
antifungal agents. Biofilms were maintained at a growth rate of 0.2 h 1 and were perfused with medium containing amphotericin
B ( ), flucytosine ( ), ketoconazole ( ), fluconazole ( ), or
no antifungal agent ( ). The antifungal agents were used at the
following concentrations (20 times the MIC): amphotericin B, 26 µg
ml 1; flucytosine, 4 µg ml 1;
fluconazole, 8 µg ml 1; and ketoconazole, 0.5 µg
ml 1. Results represent mean values from two independent
experiments carried out with duplicate samples. SEs were less than 10%
of the mean values. The viable counts of eluates from biofilms perfused
with amphotericin B were zero after 225 min.
|
|
Subsequent experiments were confined to investigating the effect of
amphotericin B on biofilms. By adjusting the flow rate,
the biofilm
growth rate was varied from approximately 0.02 to
0.2 h
1
and 0.4 h
1. Following exposure to amphotericin B at a
high concentration
(20 times the MIC), there were similar decreases in
the numbers
of viable daughter cells eluted at all three growth
rates (Fig.
6). At a growth rate of 0.02 h
1, however, the biofilm continued to shed
steady-state numbers
of daughter cells for up to 30 min after drug
addition, suggesting
a delayed effect with very slow growth.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Perfusion of C. albicans biofilms grown
at different rates with amphotericin B. Biofilms were maintained at a
growth rate of 0.02 h 1 ( ), 0.2 h 1 ( ),
or 0.4 h 1 ( ). Control biofilms ( ) were grown at a
rate of 0.2 h 1 in medium without amphotericin B. Results
represent mean values from two independent experiments carried out with
duplicate samples. SEs were less than 10% of the mean values.
|
|
Susceptibility of biofilms and planktonic cells to amphotericin B
at equivalent growth rates.
Our perfusion experiments yielded only
preliminary information on the production of viable daughter cells by
biofilms treated with amphotericin B at different growth rates. No
results on the viability of the biofilm cells on the filter were
obtained. To investigate possible growth-rate effects in
detail, biofilms formed at different growth rates were removed from the
fermentor and were exposed to amphotericin B at a concentration of
0.1 µg ml
1 for 1 h at 37°C. Cells
resuspended from biofilms and daughter cells eluted from biofilms were
treated similarly. For comparison, C. albicans cells
grown planktonically at equivalent growth rates in a chemostat were
also exposed to the drug. In all cases, viable counts were determined,
and the percent survival of treated cells was calculated by reference
to the counts obtained with unexposed, control cells.
Biofilm organisms were resistant to amphotericin B at all growth rates
tested. By contrast, the susceptibility of planktonic
cultures to the
drug was highly dependent on growth rate (Fig.
7). At very low growth rates, planktonic
cells were just as resistant
as biofilm cells, but their sensitivity
increased sharply at growth
rates above 0.13 h
1. Cells
resuspended from biofilms were more resistant than planktonic
organisms
at growth rates in excess of 0.2 h
1 but were less
resistant than intact biofilm populations. The
daughter cells eluted
from the biofilms, on the other hand, were
more susceptible than either
biofilm organisms or organisms resuspended
from biofilms (Fig.
7).
These findings indicate that the amphotericin
B resistance of
Candida biofilms is attributable not simply to
a low growth
rate but also to the biofilm mode of growth at a
surface.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Survival of planktonic and biofilm cells of
C. albicans grown at different rates after treatment
with amphotericin B. Intact biofilms ( ), resuspended biofilm cells
( ), biofilm daughter cells ( ), and planktonic cells ( ) were
exposed to amphotericin B for 1 h, and the percent survival was
estimated by determining the viable counts. Results represent mean
values (± standard error of the mean) from two independent experiments
with viable counts determined in triplicate.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A number of experimental systems for studying bacterial biofilms
have been devised. Continuous-growth models which have been widely used
with bacteria include the Robbins device (23) and submerged
test-piece systems (22). However, these systems lack effective growth-rate control and therefore do not differentiate between microbial properties attributable to growth rate and those associated with adhesion (3). With the perfused biofilm
fermentor, on the other hand, a biofilm is established on the underside
of a cellulose membrane, and a steady state develops in which the rate
of perfusion with fresh medium controls the rate of biofilm growth
(17). Although this model has been used to investigate a
variety of bacterial biofilms (10, 11, 13-15, 17), the present report describes its first successful application to a study of
fungal biofilms. A complex network of yeasts and hyphae was generated
on each cellulose membrane; these biofilms lacked the overall depth of
those formed on discs of catheter material in previous investigations
(19-21) but were otherwise similar in appearance. A
substantial amount of matrix material was present, which is consistent
with earlier findings that synthesis of the matrix increases when
developing Candida biofilms are subjected to a liquid flow
(21).
Our initial approach to investigating drug resistance involved the
perfusion of biofilms with medium containing different antifungal
agents at concentrations representing 20 times the MIC. Of the
drugs tested, amphotericin B proved to be the most effective at
reducing the number of daughter cells shed from steady-state biofilms.
The apparent failure of two azole compounds (ketoconazole and
fluconazole) and flucytosine to reduce greatly the numbers of eluted
cells may be a consequence of the relatively short contact time used,
in conjunction with the fungistatic nature of these drugs.
Similar perfusion experiments were carried out by Ashby et al.
(1) to study the effects of various antibiotics on biofilms of E. coli. They found that two compounds, imipenem and
ciprofloxacin, which were active against nongrowing planktonic cells
also showed some activity against steady-state biofilms when the
compounds were tested at 20 times the MIC. However, neither antibiotic
completely eradicated the biofilms. Only one flow rate was used in that
study (1). Here, the flow rate was adjusted to allow the
effect of perfused amphotericin B to be investigated at three biofilm
growth rates. These experiments suggested that growth rate did not have a major influence on the susceptibilities of the biofilms to the drug.
More detailed studies on the effect of biofilm growth rate on
resistance to amphotericin B were performed by using the approach taken
by Evans et al. (15), in which biofilms, resuspended biofilm cells, and daughter cells are separately tested for drug susceptibility after growth at different rates in the perfused biofilm fermentor. The
results are then compared with those obtained for planktonic cells
grown at identical rates in a chemostat. Our findings demonstrated that
intact C. albicans biofilms are resistant to the drug
over a range of growth rates, whereas planktonic cells are resistant only at very low growth rates. Very similar results have been reported
for biofilms and planktonic cells of a mucoid strain of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa tested by the same protocol for
susceptibility to the quinolone ciprofloxacin (14). By
contrast, analogous studies with E. coli
(13-15), S. epidermidis (10, 11), and nonmucoid P. aeruginosa (14) do suggest
some relationship between growth rate and biofilm susceptibility
to antimicrobial agents.
With P. aeruginosa biofilms, extensive production of matrix
material or glycocalyx by mucoid strains may mask growth-rate effects
(14). Drug exclusion by the matrix is regarded as another possible resistance mechanism for bacterial biofilms. The potential of
the matrix to act as a physical barrier to penetration will depend on a
number of factors, including the nature of the drug and the binding
capacity of the matrix toward it (3, 24). Substantial
amounts of matrix material were observed in electron micrographs of
perfused C. albicans biofilms in this study (Fig. 4).
Moreover, resuspended biofilm cells (which presumably have lost most of
their matrix) were some 20% less resistant to amphotericin B than
intact biofilms. The matrix may therefore play a relatively minor role
in the drug resistance of Candida biofilms. However, it is
unlikely to mask any growth-rate effect since the resistance of
resuspended biofilm cells to amphotericin B was largely independent of
growth rate.
Newly formed daughter cells eluted from Candida biofilms
also displayed a susceptibility to amphotericin B that was independent of growth rate. These cells were significantly more susceptible to the
drug than either intact biofilms or resuspended biofilm cells. Daughter
cells dislodged from bacterial biofilms grown in the perfused biofilm
fermentor are known to be even more drug sensitive. Such cells eluted
from biofilms of P. aeruginosa or E. coli, for
example, showed a susceptibility to ciprofloxacin equal to that of
planktonic cells grown at the maximum rate in a chemostat
(14). Again, drug sensitivity was unaffected by the growth
rate of the daughter cells.
The drug sensitivity of daughter cells in this system, coupled with the
drug resistance of the biofilms, suggests that the perfused biofilm
fermentor represents a useful model for Candida implant
infections in vivo. Implant-associated microorganisms often cause
systemic infections by releasing daughter cells into the bloodstream.
Although the septicemia can often be successfully treated with
antibiotics, the source of the infection
the biofilm
is difficult to
eliminate. One drawback of the perfused biofilm fermentor as
applied to C. albicans is the relatively short period
of continuous biofilm growth possible due to hyphal penetration
of the cellulose acetate filter. Growth of Candida
hyphae over a membrane surface and through the pores has been reported
previously (26). This behavior was attributed to contact
guidance (thigmotropism), an important property which allows the
organism to sense changes in surface topography and is likely to
facilitate hyphal penetration of epithelia in vivo.
Overall, the results of this study have confirmed earlier findings
(20) that biofilms of C. albicans are
resistant to the actions of antifungal agents and have established that
resistance is not simply attributable to the low growth rate typical of
biofilms. The resistance mechanism(s) remains unknown. There is some
indication from our experiments on the drug sensitivity of resuspended
biofilms that the matrix may play a minor role in excluding antifungal agents from the biofilm. Further studies are required to explore this
possibility. Work with bacterial systems points increasingly to
specific contact-induced gene expression as the mechanism by which
biofilms acquire their characteristic properties (6, 8). The
same may be true for C. albicans since it is already known that synthesis of new proteins occurs following attachment of the
yeast to certain surfaces (2).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grant 94/22A from the Sir Jules Thorn
Charitable Trust.
We are very grateful to I. A. Critchley for a gift of two perfused
biofilm fermentors. We are also indebted to the Janssen Research
Foundation for a supply of ketoconazole and to M. D. Richardson
for fluconazole. Assistance with SEM was kindly provided by L. Tetley
and M. Mullin.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Infection and Immunity, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences,
Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 0141-330-5842. Fax: 0141-330-4600. E-mail:
J.Douglas{at}bio.gla.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ashby, M. J.,
J. E. Neale, and I. A. Critchley.
1994.
Effect of antibiotics on non-growing planktonic cells and biofilms of Escherichia coli.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
33:443-452[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bailey, A.,
E. Wadsworth, and R. A. Calderone.
1995.
Adherence of Candida albicans to human buccal epithelial cells: host-induced protein synthesis and signaling events.
Infect. Immun.
63:569-572[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Brown, M. R. W., and P. Gilbert.
1993.
Sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents.
J. Appl. Bacteriol. Symp. Suppl.
74:87S-97S.
|
| 4.
|
Brown, M. R. W.,
D. G. Allison, and P. Gilbert.
1988.
Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics: a growth-rate related effect?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
22:777-789[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Costerton, J. W.,
K. J. Cheng,
G. G. Geesey,
T. I. Ladd,
J. C. Nickel,
M. Dasgupta, and T. J. Marrie.
1987.
Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
41:435-464[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Costerton, J. W.,
Z. Lewandowski,
D. E. Caldwell,
D. R. Korber, and H. M. Lappin-Scott.
1995.
Microbial biofilms.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49:711-745[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cox, G. M., and J. R. Perfect.
1993.
Fungal infections.
Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.
6:422-426.
|
| 8.
|
Davies, D. G.,
A. M. Chakrabarty, and G. G. Geesey.
1993.
Exopolysaccharide production in biofilms: substratum activation of alginate gene expression by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:1181-1186[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Dougherty, S. H.
1988.
Pathobiology of infection in prosthetic devices.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
10:1102-1117[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Duguid, I. G.,
E. Evans,
M. R. W. Brown, and P. Gilbert.
1992.
Growth-rate-independent killing by ciprofloxacin of biofilm-derived Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for cell-cycle dependency.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
30:791-802[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Duguid, I. G.,
E. Evans,
M. R. W. Brown, and P. Gilbert.
1992.
Effect of biofilm culture upon the susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis to tobramycin.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
30:803-810[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ellwood, D. C., and D. W. Tempest.
1972.
Effects of environment on bacterial cell wall content and composition.
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
7:83-117.
|
| 13.
|
Evans, D. J.,
D. G. Allison,
M. R. W. Brown, and P. Gilbert.
1990.
Effect of growth rate on resistance of gram-negative biofilms to cetrimide.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
26:473-478[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Evans, D. J.,
D. G. Allison,
M. R. W. Brown, and P. Gilbert.
1991.
Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli biofilms towards ciprofloxacin: effect of specific growth rate.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
27:177-184[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Evans, D. J.,
M. R. W. Brown,
D. G. Allison, and P. G. Gilbert.
1990.
Susceptibility of bacterial biofilms to tobramycin: role of specific growth rate and phase in the division cycle.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
25:585-591[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Fridkin, S. K., and W. R. Jarvis.
1996.
Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
9:499-511[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Gilbert, P.,
D. G. Allison,
D. J. Evans,
P. S. Handley, and M. R. W. Brown.
1989.
Growth rate control of adherent bacterial populations.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55:1308-1311[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Gristina, A. G.
1987.
Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration.
Science
237:1588-1595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hawser, S. P., and L. J. Douglas.
1994.
Biofilm formation by Candida species on the surface of catheter materials in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
62:915-921[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hawser, S. P., and L. J. Douglas.
1995.
Resistance of Candida albicans biofilms to antifungal agents in vitro.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:2128-2131[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Hawser, S. P.,
G. S. Baillie, and L. J. Douglas.
1998.
Production of extracellular matrix by Candida albicans biofilms.
J. Med. Microbiol.
47:253-256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Keevil, C. W.,
D. J. Bradshaw,
A. B. Dowsett, and T. W. Feary.
1987.
Microbial film formation: dental plaque deposition on acrylic tiles using continuous culture techniques.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
62:129-138[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
McCoy, W. F.,
J. D. Bryers,
J. Robbins, and J. W. Costerton.
1981.
Observations in fouling biofilm formation.
Can. J. Microbiol.
27:910-917[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Nichols, W. W.,
S. M. Dorrington,
M. P. E. Slack, and H. L. Walmsley.
1988.
Inhibition of tobramycin diffusion by binding to alginate.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
32:518-523[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Odds, F. C.
1988.
Candida and candidosis, 2nd ed.
Bailliere Tindall, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 26.
|
Sherwood, J.,
N. A. R. Gow,
G. W. Gooday,
D. W. Gregory, and D. Marshall.
1992.
Contact sensing in Candida albicans: a possible aid to epithelial penetration.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
30:461-469[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Tunney, M. M.,
S. P. Gorman, and S. Patrick.
1996.
Infection associated with medical devices.
Rev. Med. Microbiol.
7:195-205.
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1998, p. 1900-1905, Vol. 42, No. 8
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ferreira, J. A. G., Carr, J. H., Starling, C. E. F., de Resende, M. A., Donlan, R. M.
(2009). Biofilm Formation and Effect of Caspofungin on Biofilm Structure of Candida Species Bloodstream Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 4377-4384
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nett, J. E., Guite, K. M., Ringeisen, A., Holoyda, K. A., Andes, D. R.
(2008). Reduced Biocide Susceptibility in Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3411-3413
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Seneviratne, C. J., Jin, L. J., Samaranayake, Y. H., Samaranayake, L. P.
(2008). Cell Density and Cell Aging as Factors Modulating Antifungal Resistance of Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3259-3266
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Al-Dhaheri, R. S., Douglas, L. J.
(2008). Absence of Amphotericin B-Tolerant Persister Cells in Biofilms of Some Candida Species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1884-1887
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perumal, P., Mekala, S., Chaffin, W. L.
(2007). Role for Cell Density in Antifungal Drug Resistance in Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 2454-2463
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
El-Azizi, M.
(2007). Enhancement of the in vitro activity of amphotericin B against the biofilms of non-albicans Candida spp. by rifampicin and doxycycline. J Med Microbiol
56: 645-649
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bruzual, I., Riggle, P., Hadley, S., Kumamoto, C. A.
(2007). Biofilm formation by fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains is inhibited by fluconazole. J Antimicrob Chemother
59: 441-450
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nett, J., Lincoln, L., Marchillo, K., Massey, R., Holoyda, K., Hoff, B., VanHandel, M., Andes, D.
(2007). Putative Role of {beta}-1,3 Glucans in Candida albicans Biofilm Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 510-520
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hope, W. W., Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Howard, S., Kasai, M., Louie, A., Walsh, T. J., Drusano, G. L., Denning, D. W.
(2006). Derivation of an In Vivo Drug Exposure Breakpoint for Flucytosine against Candida albicans and Impact of the MIC, Growth Rate, and Resistance Genotype on the Antifungal Effect. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3680-3688
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khot, P. D., Suci, P. A., Miller, R. L., Nelson, R. D., Tyler, B. J.
(2006). A Small Subpopulation of Blastospores in Candida albicans Biofilms Exhibit Resistance to Amphotericin B Associated with Differential Regulation of Ergosterol and {beta}-1,6-Glucan Pathway Genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3708-3716
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Al-Fattani, M. A., Douglas, L. J.
(2006). Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: chemical composition and role in drug resistance.. J Med Microbiol
55: 999-1008
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Coogan, M.M., Fidel, P.L. Jr., Komesu, M.C., Maeda, N., Samaranayake, L.P.
(2006). (B1) Candida and Mycotic Infections. ADR
19: 130-138
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martinez, L. R., Casadevall, A.
(2006). Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans Biofilms to Antifungal Agents In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1021-1033
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chambless, J. D., Hunt, S. M., Stewart, P. S.
(2006). A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 2005-2013
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Logue, M. E., Wong, S., Wolfe, K. H., Butler, G.
(2005). A Genome Sequence Survey Shows that the Pathogenic Yeast Candida parapsilosis Has a Defective MTLa1 Allele at Its Mating Type Locus. Eukaryot Cell
4: 1009-1017
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramage, G., Saville, S. P., Thomas, D. P., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2005). Candida Biofilms: an Update. Eukaryot Cell
4: 633-638
[Full Text]
-
Samaranayake, Y. H., Ye, J., Yau, J. Y. Y., Cheung, B. P. K., Samaranayake, L. P.
(2005). In Vitro Method To Study Antifungal Perfusion in Candida Biofilms. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 818-825
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Andes, D., Nett, J., Oschel, P., Albrecht, R., Marchillo, K., Pitula, A.
(2004). Development and Characterization of an In Vivo Central Venous Catheter Candida albicans Biofilm Model. Infect. Immun.
72: 6023-6031
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Theraud, M., Bedouin, Y., Guiguen, C., Gangneux, J. -P.
(2004). Efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants on clinical and environmental yeast isolates in planktonic and biofilm conditions. J Med Microbiol
53: 1013-1018
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Al-Fattani, M. A., Douglas, L. J.
(2004). Penetration of Candida Biofilms by Antifungal Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3291-3297
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, X., Yan, Z., Xu, J.
(2003). Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans. Microbiology
149: 353-362
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bachmann, S. P., VandeWalle, K., Ramage, G., Patterson, T. F., Wickes, B. L., Graybill, J. R., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2002). In Vitro Activity of Caspofungin against Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 3591-3596
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramage, G., VandeWalle, K., Bachmann, S. P., Wickes, B. L., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2002). In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Properties of Three Antifungal Agents against Preformed Candida albicans Biofilms Determined by Time-Kill Studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 3634-3636
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramage, G., Bachmann, S., Patterson, T. F., Wickes, B. L., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2002). Investigation of multidrug efflux pumps in relation to fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother
49: 973-980
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Donlan, R. M., Costerton, J. W.
(2002). Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
15: 167-193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramage, G., Vande Walle, K., Wickes, B. L., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2001). Standardized Method for In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 2475-2479
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramage, G., Vande Walle, K., Wickes, B. L., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2001). Biofilm Formation by Candida dubliniensis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3234-3240
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chandra, J., Mukherjee, P.K., Leidich, S.D., Faddoul, F.F., Hoyer, L.L., Douglas, L.J., Ghannoum, M.A.
(2001). Antifungal Resistance of Candidal Biofilms Formed on Denture Acrylic in vitro. JDR
80: 903-908
[Abstract]
-
Baillie, G. S., Douglas, L. J.
(2000). Matrix polymers of Candida biofilms and their possible role in biofilm resistance to antifungal agents. J Antimicrob Chemother
46: 397-403
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lyons, C. N., White, T. C.
(2000). Transcriptional Analyses of Antifungal Drug Resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44: 2296-2303
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kirkpatrick, W. R., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., Mcatee, R. K., Patterson, T. F.
(2000). Growth Competition between Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans under Broth and Biofilm Growing Conditions. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 902-904
[Abstract]
[Full Text]