AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudreau, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudreau, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1998, p. 2106-2108, Vol. 42, No. 8
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Antimicrobial Resistance of Clinical Strains of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni Isolated from 1985 to 1997 in Quebec, Canada

Christiane Gaudreau* and Huguette Gilbert

Département de Microbiologie Médicale et Infectiologie, Campus Saint-Luc, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada H2X 3J4

Received 2 September 1997/Returned for modification 11 December 1997/Accepted 11 May 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The antimicrobial resistance of 158 Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from humans in Quebec, Canada, from 1995 to 1997 was compared to the resistance of 47 and 86 strains of C. jejuni isolated in 1985 and 1986 and in 1992 and 1993, respectively. Of the 291 C. jejuni strains tested, no strain was resistant to erythromycin. Compared to the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1985 and 1986, the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1992 and 1993 were more resistant to tetracycline (40.7 versus 19.1%, respectively; P = 0.01) but not to nalidixic acid or ciprofloxacin (P > 0.05). Compared to the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1992 and 1993 and in 1985 and 1986, the C. jejuni strains isolated from 1995 to 1997 were more resistant to tetracycline (55.7% versus 40.7 and 19.1%, respectively; P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively) to nalidixic acid (13.9% versus 4.7 and 0%, respectively; P = 0.02 and P = 0.007, respectively), and to ciprofloxacin (12.7% versus 3.5 and 0%, respectively; P = 0.02 and P = 0.009, respectively).

    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni is a major cause of human bacterial diarrhea and, occasionally, of systemic illness (1, 10). Studies in many European countries had shown that C. jejuni has increased levels of resistance to the newer fluoroquinolones but an almost stable level of resistance to erythromycin (2, 14, 15). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. is not standardized (10, 11), and the agar dilution method is the reference method (11). The levels of resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline were 0, 2, and 55%, respectively, for 130 C. jejuni and 12 Campylobacter coli strains isolated from 1982 to 1992 in Pennsylvania (9). In Ontario, Canada, 13.6% of 309 C. jejuni strains isolated from May 1992 to December 1994 were reported to be resistant to nalidixic acid, and 84% of these isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (5).

The aim of the study described here was to determine the frequency of resistance of 158 consecutive C. jejuni strains isolated from humans in Quebec, Canada, from 1995 to 1997 and to compare these results with those for 47 and 86 consecutive C. jejuni strains isolated in 1985 and 1986 and in 1992 and 1993, respectively. The C. jejuni strains were isolated at Campus Saint-Luc, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal. The strains were identified by standard methods (10) and were preserved at -70°C in Trypticase soy broth (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) supplemented with 15% (vol/vol) glycerol.

The resistance of the C. jejuni strains was determined by an agar dilution method as described previously (7); the concentrations of the antibiotics tested were 0.06 to 256 µg/ml, and a control plate without antibiotic was inoculated at the end of the procedure. Inocula were prepared in a Mueller-Hinton broth (BBL Microbiology Systems) at a density adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard for the disk diffusion method and diluted 1:10 for the agar dilution method. With a 3-mm Cathra replicator, a final inoculum of about 104 CFU was delivered onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.). The same medium was used for the disk diffusion testing. The inoculated plates were incubated at 35°C under a microaerophilic atmosphere obtained with a gas generator envelope (Difco Laboratories) for 48 h. For the agar dilution method, the endpoint was taken as the complete inhibition of macroscopic growth. The following control strains were used: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922. The following antibiotics were tested by the agar dilution method: ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); the susceptibility criteria were those of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (11). The C. jejuni strains were tested for nalidixic acid susceptibility by the disk diffusion method; strains with an inhibition zone were considered susceptible to nalidixic acid; those without such a zone were considered resistant (3, 10). Nalidixic acid (30 µg; Oxoid, Unipath Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) disks were used.

The significance of differences in resistance was analyzed by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact two-tailed test by using Epi Info, version 6.0, software (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The results of the resistance of the C. jejuni strains isolated from 1995 to 1997 to four antibiotics are reported in Table 1 and are compared to the results of the resistance of the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1985 and 1986 and in 1992 and 1993. Of the 291 C. jejuni strains from the three time periods tested, no strain was found to be resistant to erythromycin. Compared to C. jejuni strains isolated in 1985 and 1986, the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1992 and 1993 were significantly more resistant to tetracycline (40.7 and 19.1%, respectively; P = 0.01) but not to nalidixic acid or ciprofloxacin (P > 0.05). C. jejuni strains isolated from 1995 to 1997 were significantly more resistant than the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1992 and 1993 and in 1985 and 1986 to tetracycline (55.7% versus 40.7 and 19.1%, respectively; P = 0.03 and P <0.001, respectively), nalidixic acid (13.9% versus 4.7 and 0%, respectively; P = 0.02 and P = 0.007, respectively), and ciprofloxacin (12.7% versus 3.5 and 0%, respectively; P = 0.02 and P = 0.009, respectively). The C. jejuni strains isolated in 1996 were significantly more resistant than those isolated in 1995 to nalidixic acid (11 of 51 versus 4 of 52, respectively; P = 0.046) and ciprofloxacin (10 of 51 versus 3 of 52, respectively; P = 0.03). The C. jejuni strains isolated in 1997 were not more resistant than the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1996 and in 1995 to nalidixic acid (7 of 55 versus 11 of 51 and 4 of 52, respectively; P = 0.2 and P = 0.4, respectively) and ciprofloxacin (7 of 55 versus 10 of 51 and 3 of 52, respectively; P = 0.3 and P = 0.3, respectively). Ten of the 23 strains resistant to ciprofloxacin and 122 of the 268 strains susceptible to ciprofloxacin were resistant to tetracycline (P = 0.9). In 1996, two strains of C. jejuni were isolated from the same patient 1 month apart. For the first strain there was a zone around the nalidixic acid disk and the ciprofloxacin MIC was 0.06 µg/ml or less; for the second strain there was no zone around the nalidixic acid disk and the ciprofloxacin MIC was 2 µg/ml by the agar dilution method. This patient was treated with ciprofloxacin after the isolation of the first C. jejuni strain. The pattern of susceptibility to nalidixic acid for these two strains was confirmed by the Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec and by the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (LCDC), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. These two strains were not typeable by the Lior serotyping system but were shown by LCDC to be the same strain by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Resistance of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni to four antibioticsa

In this study, no strain of C. jejuni was found to be resistant to erythromycin. In previous surveys, resistance to erythromycin is reported in 0 to 12.6% of C. jejuni strains but most often in fewer than 5% of such strains (9, 10, 13, 14). In Ontario and Alberta, Canada, the rates of C. jejuni resistance to erythromycin were reported to be 1 and 0%, respectively, in the 1980s (5). The microbiological and clinical efficacies of erythromycin for the treatment of C. jejuni enterocolitis have been demonstrated previously (1, 10). We found resistance to tetracycline in 55.7% of Campylobacter spp. isolated from 1995 to 1997. Others reported that between 0 and 60% of C. jejuni strains were resistant to tetracycline (9, 14, 16). The C. jejuni strains isolated from 1995 to 1997 were significantly more resistant to the quinolones tested than the C. jejuni strains isolated in 1985 and 1986 and in 1992 and 1993. The C. jejuni strains isolated in 1996 were significantly more resistant than those isolated in 1995 to nalidixic acid (21.6 versus 7.7%) and ciprofloxacin (19.6 versus 5.8%). In previous surveys (2, 12-14), the rate C. jejuni resistance to ciprofloxacin increased from 0% to 2 to 50%. In a survey of 155 to 161 C. jejuni strains isolated from 1980 to 1983 in five Montréal area centers, 0.6, 0.6, 0, and 14.5% of the strains were resistant to erythromycin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, and tetracycline, respectively (8). In the United States, 0, 2, and 55% of Campylobacter spp. isolated from 1982 to 1992 were resistant to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline, respectively (9). In Ontario, of 309 C. jejuni strains isolated from May 1992 to December 1994, 13.6% of the strains were resistant to nalidixic acid: 17% in 1992, 10.4% in 1993, and 14.5% in 1994. Eighty-four, 7, and 16% of the nalidixic acid-resistant strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline, respectively; erythromycin and tetracycline resistance was found only among the quinolone-resistant strains (5). We found no association between ciprofloxacin and tetracycline resistance in C. jejuni. Similar to other reports (2, 3, 13), nalidixic acid was a marker for C. jejuni susceptibility to ciprofloxacin; in this study, the 265 nalidixic acid-susceptible strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin; of the 26 nalidixic acid-resistant strains, 23, 2, and 1 of the strains were resistant, intermediate, and susceptible to ciprofloxacin, respectively. The MICs for ciprofloxacin-resistant C. jejuni strains are 8 to 256 times higher than those for the susceptible ones (4, 15). Microbiological failure with or without clinical failure has been reported for ciprofloxacin-treated patients infected with C. jejuni strains that developed resistance during treatment (12, 15). Even if a low percentage of Campylobacter spp. were found to be resistant to ampicillin, between 83 and 92% of the C. jejuni strains produced a beta -lactamase (7). In a previous study, we found beta -lactamase production in 89.3% of 159 C. jejuni strains isolated from 1980 to 1983 (8). The beta -lactamase-positive strains of C. jejuni were significantly less susceptible to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and ticarcillin than the beta -lactamase-negative ones (7). Ampicillin is not recommended for use in the treatment of C. jejuni infections (1, 10). Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid had good in vitro activity against this bacterium (7, 14). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. needs to be standardized. The agar dilution method is the reference method (11), but the disk diffusion method and the Etest could be reliable and convenient methods (3, 6).

In our 10-year study, no resistance to erythromycin was found for C. jejuni, but there was a statistically significant increase in the levels of resistance to tetracycline, nalidixic acid, and ciprofloxacin for the strains studied during the three time periods over those 10 years.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Brigite Chevrier and Angela Gurd for secretarial services and the personnel of the bacteriology section of the Medical Microbiology Laboratory for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Département de Microbiologie Médicale et Infectiologie, Campus Saint-Luc, CHUM, 1058 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, Canada H2X 3J4. Phone: (514) 281-2100. Fax: (514) 281-2443. E-mail: cgaudro{at}cam.org.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Blaser, M. J. 1995. Campylobacter and related species, p. 1948-1956. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Doug, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice in infectious diseases, 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y.
2. Endtz, H. P., G. J. Ruijs, B. van Klingeren, W. H. Jansen, T. van der Reyden, and R. P. Mouton. 1991. Quinolone resistance in Campylobacter isolated from man and poultry following the introduction of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27:199-208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Gaudreau, C., and H. Gilbert. 1997. Comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:707-712[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Gootz, T. D., and B. A. Martin. 1991. Characterization of high-level quinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:840-845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Harnett, N., S. McLeod, Y. Au Yong, C. Hewitt, M. Vearncombe, and C. Krishnan. 1995. Quinolone resistance in clinical strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36:269-270[Free Full Text].
6. Huang, M. B., C. N. Baker, S. Banerjee, and F. C. Tenover. 1992. Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3243-3248[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Lachance, N., C. Gaudreau, F. Lamothe, and L. A. Larivière. 1991. Role of the beta -lactamase of Campylobacter jejuni in resistance to beta -lactam agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:813-818[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Larivière, L. A., C. L. Gaudreau, and F. F. Turgeon. 1986. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Campylobacter jejuni to twenty-five antimicrobial agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18:681-685[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Nachamkin, I. 1994. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and tetracycline from 1982 to 1992. Med. Microbiol. Lett. 3:300-305.
10. Nachamkin, I. 1995. Campylobacter and Arcobacter, p. 483-491. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 5th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard. NCCLS publication no. M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
12. Piddock, L. J. V. 1995. Quinolone resistance and Campylobacter spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36:891-898[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Rautelin, H., O.-V. Renkonen, and T. U. Kosunen. 1991. Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in subjects from Finland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2065-2069[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Reina, J., M. J. Ros, and A. Serra. 1994. Susceptibilities to 10 antimicrobial agents of 1,220 Campylobacter strains isolated from 1987 to 1993 from feces of pediatric patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:2917-2920[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Segreti, J., T. D. Gootz, L. J. Goodman, G. W. Parkhurst, J. P. Quinn, B. A. Martin, and G. M. Trenholme. 1992. High-level quinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Infect. Dis. 165:667-670[Medline].
16. Tenover, F. C., C. N. Baker, C. L. Fennell, and C. A. Ryan. 1992. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter species, p. 66-73. In I. Nachamkin, M. J. Blaser, and L. S. Tompkins (ed.), Campylobacter jejuni current status and future trends. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1998, p. 2106-2108, Vol. 42, No. 8
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudreau, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudreau, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, H.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS