Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1998, p. 2259-2261, Vol. 42, No. 9
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Influence of Assay Methodology on the Measurement
of Free Serum Ceftriaxone Concentrations
Sue J.
Kohlhepp,1,*
David N.
Gilbert,1,2 and
James E.
Leggett1,2
Earle A. Chiles Research Institute,
Providence Portland Medical Center,1 and
Oregon Health Sciences University,2
Portland, Oregon
Received 21 July 1997/Returned for modification 31 January
1998/Accepted 10 June 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The influence of assay methodology on the measurement of the active
free fraction of ceftriaxone in plasma was determined. The free
fraction was measured by three methods: agar diffusion bioassay,
precipitation of plasma protein with methanol followed by
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of the supernatant, and
ultrafiltration of plasma followed by HPLC of the filtrate. In human
serum, the free ceftriaxone levels were significantly lower
(P = 0.03) when measured on ultrafiltrates compared to
the other two methods. This difference disappeared when dolphin serum was studied. After ultrafiltration, human serum was shown, by Scatchard
plot analysis, to have two ceftriaxone binding sites. Species
differences were also demonstrated. Hence, in humans, determination of
free plasma ceftriaxone varies with the assay method employed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Many newer antimicrobial agents
demonstrate high degrees (>80%) of protein binding that limit the
amount of free drug present. The extent of protein binding may show
significant interspecies variation, thus complicating veterinary dosing
regimens and the indiscriminate extrapolation from animal models to
humans (4). Although only free drug is microbiologically
active (4), National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards guidelines are still set with total drug levels.
Overestimates of the amount of highly protein-bound drugs to be
administered can ensue, particularly in hypoalbuminemic states
related to illness or renal impairment (8, 9).
Techniques to determine the amount of free drug in plasma include
agar diffusion bioassay, protein precipitation with subsequent
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay of supernatant, and
membrane ultrafiltration with HPLC assay of the ultrafiltrate
(4). We determined the amount of free plasma ceftriaxone in
human and other animal sera.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Ceftriaxone standard powder was a gift from P. F. Sorter,
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, N.J. HPLC-grade acetonitrile was purchased from J. T. Baker, Inc., Phillipsburg, N.J. Bacto
Antibiotic Medium 1 and Bacto Agar were purchased from Difco
Laboratories, Detroit, Mich. Fatty acid-free human and horse albumins
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo. All other
chemicals were reagent grade and purchased from Sigma. Ultrafree-MC
10,000 nominal molecular weight limit filter units were purchased from
Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.
HPLC ceftriaxone concentration analysis was based on the methods of
Granich and Krogstad (7). Chromatography was carried out
with Beckman 110A pump; an Econosphere C18 5-µm silica
gel column purchased from Alltech Associates, Inc., Deerfield, Ill.; a
Hitachi L-4250 UV-VIS detector set at 280 nm and either 0.02 or 0.002 absorbance unit full scale; and a Hewlett-Packard HP 3396 series II
integrator. The mobile phase consisted of 3 g of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, 10 ml of 1 M potassium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 600 ml of acetonitrile, and double-distilled water to make 1 liter. Chromatography was carried out at room temperature and a 1-ml/min flow rate. Ceftriaxone eluted at
approximately 5 min under these conditions. Samples were prepared for
HPLC analysis by either cold-methanol precipitation or ultrafiltration.
For precipitation of serum proteins by cold methanol, 0.1 ml of
well-mixed serum with drug was added to 0.9 ml of HPLC-grade methanol
stored at 4°C. The mixture was vortexed and then centrifuged at 3,500 rpm in a CRU5000 floor model IEC centrifuge with an 8-in. radius
(2,780 × g) for 5 min to precipitate the protein. The
supernatant was assayed for ceftriaxone. Calculation of serum
ceftriaxone concentrations included a correction for the 1:10 dilution
introduced in the sample preparation.
For ultrafiltration, 0.2 ml of well-mixed serum with drug was placed in
the upper reservoir of the Millipore Ultrafree-MC filter apparatus. The
sample was then centrifuged for 10 min in the HF-120 benchtop
centrifuge supplied by Millipore for use with the filter
(12). The filtrate was assayed for ceftriaxone. Binding of
ceftriaxone to the filter apparatus itself was not distinguishable from
zero (recovery, 100% ± 5%).
Standard curves were constructed by twofold serial dilution of standard
ceftriaxone powder dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH
7.0. For the bioassay only, a standard curve was also constructed in
serum. Bioassay was performed in 4% Bacto Antibiotic Medium 1 seeded
with Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. Wells were cut in the
agar, and 50 µl of standard, controls, or samples to be assayed was
placed in the wells and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Diameters of
the clear zones, measured with calipers, were linear over the range
studied (1 to 1,000 µg/ml). The HPLC standard curve was based on the
integrator reported area under the curve and was linear over the range
studied (6.3 to 800 µg/ml). The lower limits of detection by the HPLC
assay were 5 µg/ml for the diluted, methanol-precipitated sample and
0.5 µg/ml for the filtered sample. Interday and intraday coefficients
of variation measured with ceftriaxone diluted in PBS were 6.1 and
5.8%, respectively, at clinically relevant concentrations (25 and 100 µg/ml). The precision and coefficient of variation of the bioassay
were 0.6 and 4.7% in either H2O or serum.
Antibiotic-free horse serum and horse ventricular cerebrospinal fluid
were supplied by N. C. Ringger, Department of Veterinary Medicine,
Oregon State University, Corvallis. Antibiotic-free dolphin serum was
supplied by Robert Ulrich, School for Pharmacy, University of Southern
California, Los Angeles. Antibiotic-free human middle ear fluid was
supplied by Leslie Serchuck, Department of Pediatrics, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. Antibiotic-free chinchilla
serum was supplied by Pilar Tam, Department of Pediatrics, Boston
University School of Medicine. Antibiotic-free human serum was supplied
by S.J.K. Ceftriaxone was added to all of the above antibiotic-free
biological fluids at concentrations of 6.3 to 800 µg/ml for recovery
experiments. Serum from patients receiving ceftriaxone was provided by
James Leggett after informed consent had been obtained in accordance
with institutional guidelines.
Statistical analysis was performed with the WinSTAR program purchased
from Anderson Bell Corp., Arvada, Colo. Groups were compared by using
analysis of variance or Students' t test, and P
values of 0.05 or less were required for significance. A Scatchard plot
was constructed in the usual fashion (1).
 |
RESULTS |
The three assay methods differed in the amount of free ceftriaxone
they measured in human serum to which ceftriaxone had been added. In
Fig. 1a, the agar diffusion bioassay and
the HPLC assay of methanol-precipitated serum yielded similar results
(P = 0.8) at all of the concentrations tested. Recovery
of added drug was constant at 70 to 80% for ceftriaxone concentrations
of 12.5 to 800 µg/ml. Free ceftriaxone levels, assayed by HPLC, in
filtered serum were significantly lower (P = 0.03).
Drug recovery was concentration dependent, between 5 and 25% over the
range of concentrations studied. Drug levels measured by
ultrafiltration were similar to those reported in previous studies
(13) that used an equilibrium dialysis method (Fig. 1a).
Free ceftriaxone levels were also measured in 60 patients receiving
treatment with 1 or 2 g of the drug administered intravenously per
day. Free drug levels in serum determined by agar diffusion correlated
well with levels measured by HPLC assay of methanol-precipitated serum
(r2 = 0.802) over a range of 4 to
210 µg/ml. In contrast, HPLC assay of serum submitted to
ultrafiltration differed significantly from the agar diffusion bioassay
(P = 0.03). The agar diffusion bioassay performed by
using serum underestimated ceftriaxone concentrations determined by
using PBS by 12% over a concentrations range of 6.25 to 100 µg/ml.
The shapes of the curves in Fig. 1 were shifted vertically when serum
was used as the standard curve.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Ceftriaxone recovery from human (a) and dolphin (b) sera
to which known amounts of ceftriaxone had been added, determined by
agar diffusion ( ), HPLC following methanol precipitation of
denatured proteins ( ), and HPLC following ultrafiltration ( ). All
values represent means ±1 standard deviation calculated from a minimum
of two experiments performed in triplicate. , historical values of
free ceftriaxone separated by equilibrium dialysis (14).
|
|
Figure 1b depicts the measurement of free ceftriaxone in dolphin serum
to which ceftriaxone had been added. No significant differences were
revealed among the three assay methods (P = 0.89). At
each drug concentration, approximately 70% of the added drug was
measured. Methanol precipitation of protein and membrane
ultrafiltration (data not shown) were compared in horse and chinchilla
sera to which ceftriaxone had been added. There were no differences
between the two methods. It is of interest that in human spinal fluid and middle ear fluid, the assay method made no difference in the determination of the amount of free ceftriaxone (data not shown).
To clarify ceftriaxone protein binding, free and bound forms of the
drug were separated by membrane ultrafiltration and Scatchard plot
analysis was performed. Human albumin and serum displayed two binding
sites for ceftriaxone (Fig. 2). In
contrast, horse albumin and serum showed a single binding site (data
not shown). Table 1 lists ceftriaxone
binding constants in a variety of mammalian sera. Dog, dolphin, and
horse sera analyzed by Scatchard plotting displayed only one binding
site, while baboon, human, rabbit, and rat sera displayed two sites.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Scatchard analysis of ceftriaxone bound to human serum
( ) and human albumin ( ). Free-ceftriaxone levels were determined
by HPLC quantitation after ultrafiltration to separate free from bound
drug.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Accurate determination of the active free fraction of highly
protein-bound antibiotics is important in determining antimicrobial diffusion into, and activity at, sites of infection such as the middle
ear and cerebrospinal fluid. Although equilibrium dialysis is the
classic procedure for separating free from bound drug, it is too
cumbersome for routine clinical use (6). There is no widely
accepted alternative technique. Published assay methods advocate
agar diffusion bioassay or HPLC assay after separation of free from
bound drug by either protein precipitation or membrane ultrafiltration.
We compared three methods to determine the free fraction of ceftriaxone
in serum and body fluids. The apparent free fraction in human serum,
over a clinically relevant range of concentrations, was higher when
measured by either bioassay or protein precipitation followed by HPLC
compared to membrane ultrafiltration followed by HPLC. The results are
consistent with the concept that there are two binding sites for
ceftriaxone on human albumin. Further, it appears that the
binding avidity is more tenuous for one of the two sites. We
postulate that since ultrafiltration is more gentle than
precipitation, ultrafiltration preserves both the lower-capacity,
high-affinity binding site and the higher-capacity, lower-affinity binding site. On the other hand,
precipitation with methanol preserves only the more tightly bound site,
as reflected by higher measured free ceftriaxone levels. The
methanol results are similar to those reported for acetonitrile.
Precipitation of serum proteins with acetonitrile resulted in
supernatant-free drug levels comparable to those found by
bioassay (0.99 correlation coefficient) (7).
Our study confirms previous reports of two binding sites in human serum
(11, 14) and concentration-dependent protein binding of
ceftriaxone (2, 3, 6). We assume that the assays for free
drug in middle ear and cerebrospinal fluids reflect the paucity of
albumin in these fluids. The mechanism of variable degrees of binding
of ceftriaxone by serum proteins from different species is unclear, but
the heterogeneity of drug protein binding among mammalian species is
well recognized (4).
In the past, agar diffusion and HPLC after serum protein
precipitation have been used to determine total (free and bound) ceftriaxone levels. Our data suggest that these methods
underestimate the total concentration of ceftriaxone by
approximately 20 to 30%, as recovery of ceftriaxone added to
serum was measured at 70 to 80%. Others report a 90 to
100% recovery of added drug (8, 10). The
disparity stems from methodological differences. We constructed our
standard curves in both aqueous and serum buffers. We used an aqueous
buffer to ensure that all protein binding could be detected. Previously
reported total drug levels do not account for the approximately 20% of
bound drug that fails to precipitate with methanol or does not diffuse
freely in agar. The combination of undetected, bound drug and
concentration-dependent shifts in free drug levels might contribute to
the difficulty some investigators have encountered in trying to fit
ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics to standard two-compartment
pharmacokinetic models using either first- or second-order kinetics
(5, 10, 11).
In conclusion, the determination of free ceftriaxone levels in humans
is dependent upon the assay technique used. Use of methods that
overestimate the free-drug concentration may result in
misinterpretation of data (9) or inappropriate calculations
of dosing regimens (12). Further, the magnitude of
drug-protein binding varies from animal species to animal species.
Although our experiments focused on ceftriaxone, the results indicate
the potential importance of assay methodology for other highly
protein-bound drugs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Earle A. Chiles
Research Institute, Providence Portland Medical Center, 4805 NE Glisan, Portland, OR 97213. Phone: (503) 215-6140. Fax: (503) 215-6052. E-mail:
sue_kohlhepp{at}phsor.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bernard, E. P.
1973.
A calculation for finding binding parameters from a Scatchard plot.
Ann. Biochem.
56:306-309.
|
| 2.
|
Borner, K.,
H. Lode,
B. Hampel,
M. Pfeuffer, and P. Koeppe.
1985.
Comparative pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone after subcutaneous and intravenous administration.
Chemotherapy
31:237-246[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bourget, P.,
H. Fernandez,
V. Quinquis, and C. Delouis.
1993.
Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of ceftriaxone during pregnancy.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:54-59[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Craig, W. A., and B. Suh.
1986.
Protein binding and the antimicrobial effects: methods for the determination of protein binding, p. 477-517.
In
V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
|
| 5.
|
Deeter, R. G.,
M. P. Weinstein,
K. A. Swanson,
J. S. Gross, and L. C. Baily.
1990.
Crossover assessment of serum bactericidal activity and pharmacokinetics of five broad-spectrum cephalosporins in the elderly.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:1007-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Fiset, C.,
F. Vallee,
M. LeBel, and M. G. Bergeron.
1986.
Protein binding of ceftriaxone: comparison of three techniques of determination and the effect of 2-hydroxybenzoylglycine, a drug-binding inhibitor in uremia.
Ther. Drug Monit.
8:483-489[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Granich, G. G., and D. J. Krogstad.
1987.
Ion pair high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for ceftriaxone.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:385-388[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hayton, W. L., and K. Stoeckel.
1986.
Age-associated changes in ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics.
Clin. Pharmacokinet.
11:76-86[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Leggett, J. E.,
S. A. Wolz, and W. A. Craig.
1989.
Use of serum ultrafiltrate in the serum dilution test.
J. Infect. Dis.
160:616-623[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Mulligan, T., and K. W. Kolb.
1991.
Ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in infected nursing home residents.
J. Geriatr. Drug Ther.
6:45-64.
|
| 11.
|
Popick, A. C.,
W. G. Crouthamel, and I. Bekersky.
1987.
Plasma protein binding of ceftriaxone.
Xenobiotica
17:1139-1145[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Scaglione, F.,
M. Raichi, and F. Fraschini.
1990.
Serum protein binding and extravascular diffusion of methoxyiminocephalosporins. Time courses of free and total concentrations of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in serum and pleural exudate.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
26(A):1-10[Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Singhvi, S. M.,
A. F. Heald, and E. G. Schreiber.
1978.
Pharmacokinetics of cephalosporin antibiotics: protein-binding considerations.
Chemotherapy
24:121-133[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Stoeckel, K.,
P. J. McNamara,
R. Brandt,
H. Plozza-Nottebrock, and W. H. Ziegler.
1981.
Effects of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding on ceftriaxone kinetics.
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
29:650-657[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1998, p. 2259-2261, Vol. 42, No. 9
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.