Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 1999, p. 2547-2549, Vol. 43, No. 10
Microbiology Research
Laboratory1 and Department of Pharmacy
Practice,2 The University of Illinois at
Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612; Lutheran General Hospital,
Park Ridge, Illinois 600683; and
Cedars-Sinai Health Systems, Beverly Hills, California
902114
Received 23 November 1998/Returned for modification 15 April
1999/Accepted 4 August 1999
The bactericidal activity and postantibiotic effect (PAE) of
levofloxacin against nine anaerobes were determined. Levofloxacin at concentrations of the MIC and twice the MIC was bactericidal at
24 h to five of nine and nine of nine strains, respectively. The
PAE of levofloxacin following a 2-h exposure ranged from 0.06 to
2.88 h.
Several new quinolones which have
increased activity against anaerobes have been introduced (7,
8). Levofloxacin was the first of the new agents approved by the
Food and Drug Administration. The in vitro activity of levofloxacin
against anaerobes is reported to be similar to those of sparfloxacin
and grepafloxacin but lower than those of trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin,
and gatifloxacin (1, 8). While there is an abundance of
literature on levofloxacin, the data available on anaerobes are
limited. We performed time-kill and postantibiotic effect (PAE) studies
of levofloxacin against nine anaerobic strains to examine the potential
usefulness of this agent in anaerobic or mixed anaerobic infections.
(This work was presented in part at poster sessions of the 33rd Annual
Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, San Francisco,
Calif., 1995, and the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial
Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, La., 15 to 18 September 1996 [13a]).
Eight clinical strains and one American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)
control organism were tested. The clinical isolates were obtained from
David Hecht (Chicago, Ill.). The anaerobes were stored at Each anaerobe was suspended in 10 ml of thioglycolate broth and
incubated overnight at 35°C on a shaker in an anaerobic chamber (Bactron; Sheldon Manufacturing, Cornelius, Oreg.) to obtain log-phase growth. The organisms were diluted with sterile saline until the turbidity matched a 0.5 McFarland standard. Each suspension was further
diluted in WCB to obtain final inoculum sizes of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml for MIC and time-kill studies and 5 × 106 CFU/ml for the PAE determination. The exact inoculum
size was determined via colony counts.
Levofloxacin powder was obtained from the R. W. Johnson
Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Raritan, N.J.) and prepared
according to the manufacturer's recommendations. MICs were determined
in duplicate by using the microbroth dilution method with WCB
(12). The microtiter plates were incubated anaerobically at
35°C and read at 48 h. The MIC was defined as the lowest
concentration at which there was no visible growth.
Time-kill assays were performed per National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards guidelines (13). Bacterial suspensions were added to test tubes containing prereduced WCB and levofloxacin concentrations of one-half the MIC, the MIC, and twice the MIC. One
test tube was used as a control and contained no antimicrobial agent.
The inoculum was confirmed at time 0; subsequent viable counts were
determined at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h. Sampling for colony counts was
done by removing 0.1-ml samples of broth at the specified times. Each
sample was serially diluted with sterile saline to produce 10-fold
dilutions. Colonies were counted after anaerobic incubation at 35°C
for 48 to 72 h. All procedures were performed in duplicate in an
anaerobic environment. The rate and extent of killing were determined
by plotting log10 viable counts (CFU/milliliter) against
time. Bactericidal activity was defined as a The PAE of levofloxacin was determined by a method of repeated washing
(5). Concentrations of 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0 µg/ml were tested. A tube containing no antimicrobial agent was included as a
growth control. Except for experiments with C. perfringens, all tubes were incubated for 2 h on a shaking platform in a 35°C anaerobic incubator. PAE determinations for C. perfringens
were performed following a 1-h incubation period. At the end of the exposure period, the antibiotic was removed by washing the tubes three
times. The tubes were centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, and the
bacterial pellet was resuspended with drug-free WCB. Viable counts were
determined for all tubes at this time. The tubes were placed back on a
shaking platform, with sampling performed every hour thereafter until
the broth became cloudy. All procedures were performed in duplicate in
an anaerobic environment. PAE was defined as T The MIC, PAE, and extent of killing of levofloxacin for the nine
anaerobes tested are shown in Table 1.
Representative time-kill curves are presented in Fig.
1. Like other fluoroquinolones,
levofloxacin demonstrates concentration-dependent killing. Differences
in assay conditions have been shown to affect the bactericidal activity of the fluoroquinolones (10, 16, 17). Killing is not
influenced by different media, inoculum sizes, or human sera but is
decreased under acidic conditions, in human urine, and in the presence
of magnesium and ferrous ions (16). The bactericidal
activity of fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus
was delayed, but not reduced when they were tested under anaerobic
conditions (17).
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Bactericidal Activity and Postantibiotic Effect
of Levofloxacin against Anaerobes
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
70°C in
skim milk and underwent three subcultures prior to testing. Isolates
with various susceptibility patterns were selected for time-kill and
PAE assays. Prereduced Wilkins-Chalgren broth (WCB) (Oxoid-Unipath,
Ogdensburg, N.Y.) was used for MIC, time-kill, and PAE testing. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention anaerobic blood agar (Remel, Lenexa,
Kans.) was used for viable count determinations for the
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Peptostreptococcus
magnus strains, and Wilkins-Chalgren agar was used for
Clostridium perfringens.
3 log10 decrease in CFU/ml, while bacteriostatic activity was defined as a <3
log10 decrease in CFU/ml. The lower limit of detection was
2 log10 CFU/ml.
C,
where T is the time required for the count in the test
culture to increase 1 log10 above the count observed immediately after drug removal and C is the time required
for the count in the untreated control to increase 1 log10
above the count observed immediately after drug removal. Regression
analyses of the MIC versus duration of PAE and of the ratio of the
antibiotic concentration/MIC versus duration of PAE were performed.
TABLE 1.
MIC, time-kill, and PAE results for levofloxacin against
nine anaerobes

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Time-kill results for levofloxacin against four
representative anaerobes. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
,
control;
, one-half the MIC;
, MIC;
, twice the MIC. ...,
lower limit of detection.
The results of our time-kill experiments are in agreement with data available on aerobes. At a concentration of the MIC, levofloxacin was bactericidal for five of nine of the organisms at 24 h. Increasing the concentration to twice the MIC resulted in bactericidal activity against all organisms by 24 h. As a class, the fluoroquinolone antibiotics are characterized by their rapid bactericidal activity. The rate of killing was lower with the anaerobes compared to results obtained with aerobic organisms (2, 10, 16, 17). The mechanism involved in delayed killing under anaerobic conditions is unknown but is thought to be multifactorial (10, 17).
Currently, there is only one published study comparing the time-kill kinetics of levofloxacin and other antibiotics against anaerobes. Spangler et al. examined the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against 11 anaerobes using a modified time-kill assay with oxyrase solution (14). They found that 90% of the anaerobes were killed at the MIC and 99% were killed at four times the MIC. They noted more-rapid killing at 6 h by levofloxacin, DU-6859a, and clindamycin than by ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and metronidazole but did not include specific data.
Literature on the PAE of antibiotics against anaerobes is extremely limited. Against aerobes, levofloxacin has a PAE ranging from 0.5 to 4.5 h (6, 9, 11, 15). Major differences in PAE procedures make comparison of data difficult. In our study, the PAE of levofloxacin following a 2-h exposure ranged from 0.04 to 2.88 h. Regression analyses of the MIC versus PAE and the ratio of the levofloxacin concentration/MIC versus PAE revealed no statistically significant correlation. There was a trend among the anaerobes for which the MICs were low (0.5 to 1 µg/ml) for a longer duration of PAE than that among the anaerobes for which the MICs were high (2 to 4 µg/ml). Levofloxacin was rapidly bactericidal against C. perfringens, such that the antibiotic exposure period had to be reduced to 1 h to prevent complete killing. The concentrations that we tested are lower than serum levels achievable with current dosing recommendations. Steady-state Cmax values of levofloxacin for daily doses of 500, 750, and 1,000 mg are reported to be 5.72, 8.6, and 11.8 µg/ml, respectively (3, 4).
In summary, the time-kill kinetics and PAE of levofloxacin against the nine anaerobes demonstrated results similar to those of studies conducted with aerobic organisms. The bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against all organisms was observed at a concentration of twice the MIC. The rate of killing was delayed compared to time-kill curves obtained with aerobic organisms. Our in vitro data indicate that levofloxacin should be effective in the treatment of infections due to susceptible anaerobes. This agent may be useful in the treatment of mild-to-moderate mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Results from clinical trials will ultimately determine the role of levofloxacin in the treatment of these infections.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice (M/C 886), 833 South Wood St., Chicago, IL 60612. Phone: (312) 996-8639. Fax: (312) 413-1797. E-mail: pendland{at}uic.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bauernfeind, A.
1997.
Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:639-651 |
| 2. |
Chalkley, L. J., and H. J. Koornhof.
1985.
Antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus determined by the killing curve method: antibiotic comparisons and synergistic interactions.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
28:331-342 |
| 3. | Chien, S.-C., M. C. Rogge, L. G. Gisclon, C. Curtin, F. Wong, J. Natarajan, R. R. Williams, C. L. Fowler, W. K. Cheung, and A. T. Chow. 1997. Pharmacokinetic profile of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral or intravenous doses. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2256-2260[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Chien, S.-C.,
F. A. Wong,
C. L. Fowler,
S. V. Callery-D'Amico,
R. R. Williams,
R. Nayak, and A. T. Chow.
1998.
Double-blind evaluation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral once-daily 750-milligram and 1-gram doses of levofloxacin in healthy volunteers.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:885-888 |
| 5. | Craig, W. A., and S. Gudmundsson. 1996. Postantibiotic effect, p. 296-329. In V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 4th ed. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md. |
| 6. | Fu, K. P., B. Foleno, and M. E. Rosenthale. 1992. The postantibiotic suppressive effect of L-ofloxacin, an optically active isomer of ofloxacin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:375-378[Medline]. |
| 7. | Goldstein, E. J. C. 1996. Possible role for the fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, grepafloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, sparfloxacin, and DU-6859a) in the treatment of anaerobic infections: review of current information on efficacy and safety. Clin. Infect. Dis. 23(Suppl. 1):S25-S30. |
| 8. | Hecht, D. W., and H. M. Wexler. 1996. In vitro susceptibility of anaerobes to quinolones in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 23(Suppl. 1):S2-S8. |
| 9. | Houston, A. K., and R. N. Jones. 1994. Postantibiotic effect of DU-6859a and levofloxacin as compared to ofloxacin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:57-59[Medline]. |
| 10. | Lewin, C. S., I. Morrissey, and J. T. Smith. 1991. The mode of action of quinolones: the paradox in activity of low and high concentrations and activity in anaerobic environment. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:240-248[Medline]. |
| 11. | Licata, L., C. E. Smith, R. M. Goldschmidt, J. F. Barrett, and M. Frosco. 1997. Comparison of the postantibiotic and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:950-955[Abstract]. |
| 12. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1993. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria, 3rd. ed. Approved standard. NCCLS document M11-A3, vol. 13, no. 26. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. |
| 13. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1992. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; tentative guideline. NCCLS document M26-T, vol. 12, no. 19. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. |
| 13a. | Pendland, S. L., M. Diaz-Linares, J. G. Woodward, S. Ryu, and L. H. Danziger. 1996. Bactericidal activity of levofloxacin (L) against Bacteriodes (B), abstr. E9, p. 82. In Program and abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 14. |
Spangler, S. K.,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1997.
Bactericidal activity of DU-6859a compared to activities of three quinolones, three -lactams, clindamycin, and metronidazole against anaerobes as determined by time-kill methodology.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:847-849[Abstract].
|
| 15. |
Spangler, S. K.,
G. Lin,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1998.
Postantibiotic effect and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of levofloxacin compared to those of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 20 pneumococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1253-1255 |
| 16. |
Tanaka, M.,
K. Hoshino,
M. Hohmura, et al.
1996.
Effect of growth conditions on antimicrobial activity of DU-6859a and its bactericidal activity determined by the killing curve method.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:1091-1102 |
| 17. |
Zabinski, R. A.,
K. J. Walker,
A. J. Larsson,
J. A. Moody,
G. W. Kaatz, and J. C. Rotschafer.
1995.
Effect of aerobic and anaerobic environments on antistaphylococcal activities of five fluoroquinolones.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:507-512 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»