Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 1999, p. 2562-2564, Vol. 43, No. 10
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T
1Z31; Eisai, Inc., Teaneck, New Jersey
076662; and Eisai Merrimack
Valley3 and Eisai Research
Institute, Andover, Massachusetts 018104
Received 4 November 1998/Returned for modification 4 April
1999/Accepted 20 July 1999
The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution profile
of a novel endotoxin antagonist, [14C]E5531, at 1 µg/ml
in plasma samples obtained from fasted human subjects with various
lipid and protein concentrations. Our findings suggest that the
majority of E5531 binds with high-density lipoproteins (HDLs)
independently of plasma lipid and protein levels tested. Furthermore,
it appears that an increase in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL)
lipid and protein levels and an increase in low-density lipoprotein
(LDL) lipid levels significantly increase TRL plus LDL binding of
E5531. However, only an increase in HDL protein levels significantly
increases HDL binding of E5531.
Recent work by Rose et al.
(7a) suggests that E5531, a novel endotoxin antagonist,
binds primarily to high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) upon incubation in
human serum at 37°C. Furthermore, they observed that loss of drug
activity occurred rapidly upon binding to HDLs (7). However,
studies have not been done to determine if changes in plasma lipid and
lipoprotein concentrations, often observed in septic patients
(1) who would be receiving this drug, would modify the
plasma lipoprotein binding of E5531. In addition, no studies have been
done to elucidate which components of plasma lipoproteins (i.e.,
cholesterol, triglycerides [TGs], and protein) are responsible for
the binding of E5531 to HDL. Thus, the objective of the proposed study
was to determine the profile of distribution of E5531 in human plasma
obtained from patients with various total and plasma lipoprotein lipid
and protein concentrations by using density gradient
ultracentrifugation and affinity chromatography.
Radiolabeled E5531 ([14C]E5531; specific activity, 105 mCi/mmol) was solubilized with sodium hydroxide in lactose-phosphate buffer as described previously (7). The volume of vehicle
required to reconstitute 1 µg of E5531 per ml did not modify
the lipoprotein concentration or composition (data not
shown). Randomly selected human plasma, obtained from the Red
Cross (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), was provided freshly drawn
(i.e., removed from the donor within the previous 48 h) and
frozen. Initial screening of individual patient plasma samples for
differences in the lipoprotein lipid composition and a patient
medication profile were completed. Plasma from patients that were
receiving medication that could modify lipoprotein metabolism (i.e.,
lipid-lowering agents or cyclosporine) was not used. Patient plasma
samples were selected based on significant differences in the total
cholesterol (TC) and/or the total TG of the separated lipoprotein
fractions. For all E5531 incubation studies, plasma samples were
separated into their different lipoprotein and lipoprotein-deficient
subfractions by step-gradient ultracentrifugation as previously
described (2, 10). To ensure that the distribution of E5531
found in each of these fractions was a result of its association with
each lipoprotein or lipoprotein-deficient (LPDP) fraction and not a
result of the density of the formulation, the density of the E5531
formulation incubated in the LPDP fraction for 60 min at 37°C was
determined by ultracentrifugation. The concentration of E5531 in each
lipoprotein and LPDP sample was determined by radioactivity and
compared to an external calibration curve to correct for quenching
within each fraction. Total plasma and lipoprotein cholesterol, TG, and protein concentrations were determined by enzymatic assays purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (2).
To assess the influence of modified plasma and lipoprotein cholesterol
profiles on the distribution of [14C]E5531 in
plasma, the following protocol was used. [14C]E5531
at 1.0 µg/ml (0.64 µM; physiological concentrations in plasma
likely to be obtained following infusion into patients [unpublished
observations]) was incubated in plasma samples from six human subjects
with various total plasma cholesterol levels (70 to 229 mg/dl) for 5 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h at 37°C. Following incubation
at each time point, plasma fractions were separated into their plasma
lipoprotein and LPDP fractions, and each of these fractions was
analyzed for E5531 content by radioactivity. The plasma and lipoprotein
cholesterol, TG, and protein concentrations were determined in each
fraction and correlated to the percentage of E5531 recovered in each fraction.
To confirm that the distribution of E5531 found in each of these
fractions was a result of its association with each lipoprotein or LPDP
fraction and not a function of the lipoprotein separation technique,
E5531 lipoprotein distribution was determined by affinity chromatography (LDL-Direct; Isolab) (2) to separate the
plasma into its different lipoprotein fractions.
Correlation coefficients between the percentage of E5531
recovered within the plasma triglyceride-rich lipoprotein
(TRL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and HDL fractions and the
concentration of cholesterol, TG, and protein within these fractions
were determined by using Pearson's test. The interday coefficient of
variation (%CV) for E5531 assay detection within each of the
lipoprotein and LPDP fractions of each patient's plasma was also
determined. A difference was considered significant if the probability
of chance explaining the results was reduced to less than 5%
(P < 0.05). All data were expressed as a mean ± standard deviation.
Initial studies were designed to determine if changes in incubation
time would alter the distribution profile of the compound in plasma.
E5531 at 1 µg/ml was incubated for 5 min, 1 h, 3 h, and
6 h in one normocholesterolemic plasma sample (TC = 161 mg/dl) and one hypercholesterolemic plasma sample (TC = 280 mg/dl), and the distribution profile in plasma was determined. In both
plasma samples, increases in incubation time from 5 min to up to 6 h did not alter the distribution profile for E5531 (data not shown). Based on these observations, all future studies reported in this article were done with an incubation time of 5 min.
To determine if the use of different lipoprotein separation techniques
would modify the distribution profile of the compound in plasma, E5531
at 1 µg/ml was incubated for 5 min in a normolipidemic human plasma
sample (TC = 161 mg/dl). Although significant differences in the
percentage of E5531 recovered in the different plasma fractions were
observed, the pattern of drug distribution was similar (data not
shown). Similar findings were observed when the analysis of E5531
plasma lipoprotein distribution by using different lipoprotein separation techniques was tested in other human plasmas (data not
shown). Based on these observations, all studies reported in this
article used density gradient ultracentrifugation to partition plasma
into its different lipoprotein and LPDP components.
When E5531 at 1.0 µg/ml was incubated within plasma obtained from six
human subjects with various TC levels, the majority of drug was
recovered in the HDL fraction for all plasmas tested (Table
1). In addition, when an E5531
concentration range of 0.25 to 1.5 µg/ml was incubated in these
plasmas, similar distribution profiles in plasma to 1 µg/ml were
observed (data not shown). When the correlations between the percentage
of E5531 recovered within the TRL, LDL, and HDL fractions versus the
concentration of cholesterol, TG, and protein in these fractions,
respectively, were determined, the following results were found.
Positive correlations were observed for TRL cholesterol, TG, and
protein concentrations (Fig. 1A); LDL
cholesterol and TG concentrations (Fig. 1B); and HDL protein
concentrations (Fig. 1C). A negative correlation was observed for the
percentage of E5531 recovered in the LDL fraction versus HDL protein
concentrations (r =
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Lipoprotein Distribution of a Novel Endotoxin
Antagonist, E5531, in Plasma from Human Subjects with Various
Lipid Levels
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
0.84; P < 0.04; data not shown). No significant correlations were observed for the percentage of
E5531 recovered within these lipoprotein fractions versus the TC/TG,
TC/total protein (TP), and TG/TP ratios within each lipoprotein fraction.
TABLE 1.
Distribution of 1 µg of [14C]E5531 per ml
within plasma from six human subjects

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Correlation coefficients between the percentage of E5531
recovered in each lipoprotein fraction with the concentration
(milligrams per deciliter) in plasma of TRL TC, TG, and TP (A); LDL TC,
TG, and TP (B); and HDL TC and TP (C) from six different patients
following the incubation of [14C]E5531. Results are
expressed as r (Pearson correlation coefficient) values with
significance (P values).
Preliminary studies by Rose and coworkers have supported the importance of plasma lipoprotein binding in influencing the long-term effectiveness of E5531 (7). They reported that E5531 slowly inactivated when bound to HDL, while little or no loss in activity occurred when associated with LDL in in vitro assays (7). In the present investigation, we observed that regardless of total plasma and lipoprotein lipid and protein levels, the majority of E5531 incubated in plasma from different human subjects was recovered in the HDL fraction (Table 1). Since HDL and LDL cholesterol are not usually found in equimolar ratios in human plasma, but are found at an LDL/HDL ratio of 4:1 to 6:1 (11), these findings suggest that some mechanism besides random probability or specific characteristics of HDL must dictate E5531's preferential association with HDL rather than LDL. A possibility may be the protein component of HDL. This is supported by the fact that nearly 50% of HDL by weight is composed of protein (3, 4) and our observations that increases in HDL protein levels resulted in an increasing percentage of E5531 recovered in this fraction (Fig. 1).
We have further observed that various plasma lipoprotein levels and specific increases in TRL lipid and protein and LDL lipid levels resulted in an increasing percentage of E5531 recovered in these fractions (Fig. 1). However, changes in lipoprotein composition did not modify the E5531 lipoprotein distribution profile (Fig. 1). These findings suggest that the E5531 lipoprotein distribution may be partially dictated by LDL and TRL lipid mass and lipoprotein particle number. The findings further suggest that the redistribution of E5531 from one lipoprotein class (HDL) to another (LDL or TRL) could be influenced by different disease states (5, 6, 8, 9) and adjunct therapies, such as Intralipid infusion (12), in which plasma lipoprotein concentrations and composition are altered.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Funding for this work was provided by Eisai to K.M.W.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2146 East Mall Ave., Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Z3. Phone: (604) 822-4889. Fax: (604) 822-3035. E-mail: Kwasan{at}unixg.ubc.ca.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Alvares, C., and A. Ramos.
1986.
Lipids, lipoproteins, and apoproteins in serum during infection.
Clin. Chem.
32:142-145 |
| 2. |
Cassidy, S. M.,
F. W. Strobel, and K. M. Wasan.
1998.
Plasma lipoprotein distribution of liposomal nystatin is influenced by protein content of high-density lipoproteins.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1878-1888 |
| 3. | Davis, R. A., and J. E. Vance. 1996. Structure, assembly and secretion of lipoproteins, p. 473-493. In D. E. Vance, and J. E. Vance (ed.), Biochemistry of lipids, lipoproteins and membranes. Elsevier, New York, N.Y. |
| 4. | Davis, R. A. 1991. Lipoprotein structure and secretion, p. 403-426. In D. E. Vance, and J. E. Vance (ed.), Biochemistry of lipids, lipoproteins and membranes. Elsevier, New York, N.Y. |
| 5. | Feingold, K. R., R. M. Krauss, M. Pang, et al. 1993. The hypertriglyceridemia of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an increased prevalence of low-density lipoprotein subclass pattern. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 76:1423-1431[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Grunfeld, C., M. Pang, W. Doerrler, et al. 1992. Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 74:2045-2051. |
| 7. | Rose, J., M. Mullarkey, W. J. Christ, L. D. Hawkins, M. Lynn, Y. Kishi, K. M. Wasan, K. Peteherych, and D. P. Rossignol. Unpublished data. |
| 7a. | Rose, J., et al. Unpublished observations. |
| 8. | Umeki, S. 1993. Decreases in serum cholesterol levels in advanced lung cancer. Respiration 60:178-181[Medline]. |
| 9. | Vitols, S., G. Gahrton, M. Bjorkholm, and C. Peterson. 1985. Hypocholesterolemia in malignancy due to elevated low-density-lipoprotein-receptor activity in tumor cells: evidence from studies in patients with leukemia. Lancet iv:1150-1154. |
| 10. | Wasan, K. M., S. M. Cassidy, M. Ramaswamy, A. Kennedy, F. W. Strobel, S. P. Ng, and T. P. Lee. 1999. A comparison of step-gradient and sequential density ultracentrifugation and the use of lipoprotein deficient plasma controls in determining the plasma lipoprotein distribution of lipid-associated nystatin and cyclosporine. Pharm. Res. 16:165-169[Medline]. |
| 11. | Wasan, K. M., and G. Lopez-Berestein. 1995. Targeted liposomes in fungi: modifying the therapeutic index of amphotericin B by its incorporation into negatively charged liposomes. J. Liposome Res. 5:883-903. |
| 12. |
Wasan, K. M.,
V. B. Grossie, Jr., and G. Lopez-Berestein.
1994.
Concentrations in serum and tissue distribution of free and liposomal amphotericin B in rats during continuous Intralipid infusion.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2224-2226 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»