Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 1999, p. 2565-2568, Vol. 43, No. 10
Division of Adult Infectious Diseases and St.
John's Cardiovascular Research Center, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center,
Torrance, California 90509,1 and UCLA
School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 900242
Received 4 February 1999/Returned for modification 9 July
1999/Accepted 4 August 1999
We evaluated several 3-day antimicrobial regimens in the treatment
of experimental endocarditis caused by an oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain exhibiting intermediate
susceptibility in vitro to vancomycin (VISA). Neither vancomycin alone
nor trovafloxacin exhibited in vivo efficacy; addition of amikacin to
vancomycin yielded a modest in vivo effect. In contrast, the
combination of ampicillin and sulbactam was highly effective in vivo,
causing a mean decrease in VISA vegetation densities of >5
log10 CFU/g versus those of untreated controls.
Until recently, vancomycin was
uniformly active in vitro against all oxacillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) strains. However, within the
last few years, investigators in Japan and the United States have
documented the isolation of ORSA strains with intermediate
susceptibility to vancomycin (VISA) (MICs of 4 to 8 µg/ml) from
patients with recalcitrant clinical infections who were failing
vancomycin therapy (7, 8, 12).
The present study was designed to examine the in vivo efficacies of
several antibiotic regimens, including that of the potent new
fluoroquinolone agent trovafloxacin, in the treatment of a severe
experimental infection caused by VISA, aortic-valve endocarditis. The
rabbit animal model provides a rigorous test of antimicrobial efficacy
(1, 4, 5, 13, 19).
VISA MU-50 was kindly provided by K. Hiramatsu, Tokyo, Japan, and has
been described in detail previously (11). This organism was
isolated from a child with a relapsing median sternotomy wound infection who was failing vancomycin therapy. Briefly, this strain exhibits heterotypic resistance to both oxacillin (ORSA) and vancomycin (VISA) by population analyses; moreover, compared to
vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus strains, MU-50 demonstrates
the characteristic VISA phenotypes of excessive cell wall thickness on
electron microscopy, increases in penicillin-binding protein
production, and upregulation of cell wall murein precursor biosynthesis
(12, 17, 20).
Vancomycin, amikacin, and ampicillin were purchased from commercial
sources (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Ind.; Faulding Pharmaceuticals, Aguadilla, P.R.; and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, N.J.,
respectively). Sulbactam and trovafloxacin (as the prodrug
[alatrofloxacin]) were supplied by Pfizer Central Research (Groton,
Conn.). For alatrofloxacin, 1 mg is equivalent to ~0.80 mg of
trovafloxacin (21). Antibiotics were reconstituted according
to the manufacturers' recommendations.
MICs for the VISA strain were determined by a National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards-recommended broth microdilution method
(with cation [Ca2+ and Mg2+]-supplemented
Mueller-Hinton [CSMH] broth [Difco, Detroit, Mich.] plus 2% NaCl)
as previously described (3). The final VISA inoculum was
106 CFU/ml (to mirror readily achievable staphylococcal
vegetation densities in the endocarditis model [13]).
The antibiotic concentration range tested was 0.125 to 128 µg/ml,
encompassing the concentrations in serum achieved by these agents in
experimental infective endocarditis (IE) when they were administered in
the dose regimens used in this study (see below). The MICs were defined
as the lowest antibiotic concentrations yielding no visible growth
after 24 h of incubation at 32°C. The capacity of sulbactam to
enhance the growth inhibitory effects of ampicillin against the VISA
strain were evaluated with the broth microtiter dilution system.
Antibiotic ranges tested were 0.125 to 128 µg/ml for ampicillin and
0.0625 to 64 µg/ml for sulbactam, to parallel that of the clinically
available formulation of this agent (Unasyn), which provides a 2:1 drug
ratio. An enhanced growth inhibitory effect was defined as a reduction
in both ampicillin and sulbactam MICs by at least fourfold by the drug
combination (13).
The comparative in vitro bactericidal effects of the various study
drugs were delineated by the timed-kill curve method. A final inoculum
of 106 CFU/ml of logarithmio-phase VISA cells was
incorporated into CSMH broth plus 2% NaCl. The final antibiotic
concentrations represented five times the in vitro MICs as determined
above. For ampicillin-sulbactam combinations, the concentration of each
individual drug used was based on the MIC results for the drugs in
combination, as defined above. For the vancomycin-amikacin combination,
the concentration of each individual drug was based on the results of
the MIC studies described above. At 0, 4, 6, and 24 h of
incubation at 32°C, 100 µl from each growth tube was quantitatively
cultured in CSMH agar (plus 2% NaCl) for an additional 48 h and
the numbers of surviving CFU were counted. A decline of The rabbit model of catheter-induced IE was used to evaluate
therapeutic efficacy in this study as previously described (13, 19). Twenty-four hours after aortic-valve catheterization,
animals were challenged intravenously (i.v.) with the
95%-infective-dose inoculum for the VISA strain as determined in pilot
studies (~2 × 106 CFU). Twenty-four hours
postchallenge, blood samples were cultured to document induction of IE.
Animals were then randomized to receive either no therapy or their
first antibiotic treatment.
The pharmacokinetics of all the antibiotics in the dose regimens used
in this study have previously been determined with the rabbit IE model
and were not repeated (2, 3, 6, 9, 13, 19). Moreover, all
antibiotic regimens were designed to attain peak levels in plasma above
the MICs for all agents against the infecting VISA strain (2, 3,
6, 9).
Animals received either no therapy (controls) or one of the following
antibiotic regimens for 3 days: trovafloxacin (25 mg/kg of body weight
i.v., administered twice a day [b.i.d.] as the prodrug
alatrofloxacin), vancomycin (15 mg/kg i.v., administered b.i.d.) alone
or with amikacin (7.5 mg/kg intramuscularly [i.m.], administered
b.i.d.), or ampicillin (200 mg/kg i.m., administered three times a day)
plus sulbactam (20 mg/kg i.m., administered b.i.d.).
For assessment of treatment efficacy, all animals were sacrificed by
i.v. sodium pentobarbital overdosage at least 24 h after the last
drug dose, to minimize antibiotic carryover effects in vivo. At the
time of sacrifice, proper catheter placement across the aortic valve
was confirmed. Only animals with proper catheter placement and
macroscopic vegetations on the aortic valve were further analyzed. All
vegetations from a single animal were removed, weighed, homogenized,
serially diluted, and quantitatively cultured. The serial-dilution
strategy further minimized potential antibiotic carryover effects. For
calculation of the median and mean bacterial densities per gram of
vegetation, culture-negative vegetations were assigned a value based on
vegetation weight and the lower limit of detection in CFU per gram
(13, 19). For randomly selected vegetation homogenates from
untreated controls, parallel plating for quantitative culture was
performed with untreated or vancomycin (2 µg/ml)-containing CSMH agar
plates to confirm retention of the VISA phenotype in vivo.
Fisher's exact test was used for comparing proportional data, while
Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc correction
for multiple comparisons was used for comparing differences between
median vegetation staphylococcal densities. P values of
The MICs (in micrograms per milliliter) for the VISA strain were 8 for
vancomycin, 64 for ampicillin, >128 for sulbactam, 0.5 for amikacin,
and 2 for trovafloxacin (the trovafloxacin MIC was within the Food and
Drug Administration-approved susceptible range [MIC breakpoint, In timed-kill curves, ampicillin plus sulbactam exerted rapid and
substantial bactericidal effects in vitro over the 24-h incubation
period at five times the MIC (a mean decrease of 6 log10
CFU/ml by 4 h of incubation) (Fig.
1). In contrast, both trovafloxacin and
vancomycin exerted slow and incomplete bactericidal effects (mean
decreases of 1.3 and 2.6 log10 CFU/ml, respectively, by
24 h of incubation). This same slow in vitro bactericidal effect with trovafloxacin was observed at eight times the MICs (data not
shown). Amikacin alone yielded a rapid bactericidal effect at 6 h
of incubation; however, rapid regrowth was observed by 24 h of
incubation (data not shown), and phenotypically small-colony variants
were commonly observed at this time point. The addition of amikacin to
vancomycin yielded a synergistic reduction in VISA density compared to
that produced by vancomycin alone by 24 of incubation. In the untreated
control animals, the VISA phenotype was retained during in vivo
passage, with vegetation densities on antibiotic-free and vancomycin (2 µg/ml)-containing media generally being within ~1 log10
CFU/g of each other. For the VISA strain, only the ampicillin-sulbactam
regimen was active in terms of significant reductions in
intravegetation densities compared to those of untreated controls
(Table 1). Moreover, the proportion of
vegetations from animals treated with this regimen that were rendered
culture negative (85%) was significantly higher than those of
vegetations from animals treated with the other antibiotic regimens
(0%; P < 0.005). Although not reaching statistical
significance, the addition of amikacin to vancomycin yielded a modest
reduction in VISA vegetation densities, compared to those of animals
treated with vancomycin alone (~3-log10-CFU/g decrease).
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal
Endocarditis Due to a Strain with Reduced Susceptibility In Vitro to
Vancomycin: Efficacy of Ampicillin-Sulbactam

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
3
log10 CFU/ml after 24 h of incubation (versus the 0-h
bacterial counts) was considered evidence of a bactericidal effect
(13, 19).
0.05 were considered statistically significant.
2
µg/ml] determined in 1998). Synergistic growth inhibition was
exhibited against the VISA strain by the combination of ampicillin and
sulbactam at plasma-achievable levels for both antibiotics in this
experimental model (16 and 8 µg/ml, respectively).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Timed-kill curve of VISA MU-50 (inoculum,
106) versus the studied antibiotics, each at five times the
MIC. Trova, trovafloxacin; Vanco, vancomycin; Vanco+Amk, vancomycin
plus amikacin; A+S, ampicillin plus sulbactam; Control, medium alone.
Data points represent the means of results from two independent assays
performed on different days.
TABLE 1.
Efficacies of vancomycin, trovafloxacin, and
ampicillin-sulbactam in experimental IE due to VISA MU-50 and
vegetation densities
VISA strains have been shown to be relatively common in selected geographic locales. For example, Hiramatsu et al. (11) demonstrated, in a survey of more than 1,000 ORSA isolates from more than 200 Japanese hospitals and clinics, that ~10% of such strains exhibited the VISA phenotype. The mechanisms underlying the VISA phenotype are incompletely delineated to date. However, VISA strains share the following phenotypic characteristics: (i) decreased cell wall autolytic activity in the face of normal or supranormal cell wall synthetic rates (20) (this dysregulation of cell wall turnover results in excessively thick and irregular cell walls in VISA strains morphologically [20]); (ii) increased expression of penicillin-binding proteins (17); (iii) a nonhydrolytic trapping capacity for glycopeptide antibiotics, in which situation the glycopeptide agent retains bioactivity and yet is prevented from reaching its synthetic target (i.e., cell wall synthetic sites close to the cytoplasmic membrane [20]); and (iv) lack of the vanA, vanB, or vanC genotype that is the sine quo non of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (18).
In this study, we evaluated the efficacies of trovafloxacin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and vancomycin (alone or in combination with amikacin) in the therapy of experimental VISA IE due to a well-characterized, heterotypic strain (MU-50). The choice of these antibiotic regimens was based on recent experiences with both human and experimental invasive staphylococcal infections: (i) several recent studies, including one from our own laboratory, have confirmed the in vivo efficacy of trovafloxacin in experimental endocarditis caused by oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus and ORSA strains, as well as oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (ORSE) strains (3, 14, 15); (ii) studies from our laboratory have demonstrated the efficacy of high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam regimens in the therapy and prophylaxis of experimental ORSA and ORSE IE (13, 19); and (iii) in several published cases of VISA infection (7, 8, 12), patients were cured with appropriate debridement and/or catheter removals plus antibiotic therapy with ampicillin-sulbactam regimens combined with the aminoglycoside arbekacin. Since arbekacin is unavailable in the United States but is closely related to amikacin, the latter agent was used in our investigation.
Several notable findings emerged from this study. As expected, vancomycin monotherapy was ineffective at reducing VISA vegetation densities. In contrast, the combination of amikacin and vancomycin resulted in a modest reduction in VISA vegetation densities, paralleling the reduction in VISA densities achieved in vitro by the addition of amikacin to vancomycin in timed-kill curves. Although the aberrantly thick cell walls of VISA strains appear to nonhydrolytically trap vancomycin, it is conceivable that sufficient levels of the agent reach the target sites to induce facilitated aminoglycoside uptake (16). Moreover, it should be emphasized that the treatment course in the present study was only 3 days; it is plausible that a longer treatment regimen with the drug combination may well have yielded an even more salutary outcome against VISA IE. Despite the efficacy of trovafloxacin in several recent investigations of oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus, ORSA, and ORSE IE (3, 14, 15), this agent had little demonstrable in vivo efficacy against VISA IE caused by the MU-50 strain. It should be emphasized that in those studies, the infecting staphylococcal strains were more susceptible in vitro to trovafloxacin than the MU-50 VISA strain (MICs ranging from 0.06 to 1 µg/ml versus 2 µg/ml, respectively). It is not known whether the abnormally thick cell wall is capable of trapping trovafloxacin as it does vancomycin. The combination of ampicillin and sulbactam was highly active both in vitro and in vivo against the VISA strain in the present investigation, paralleling its excellent efficacy in previous models of IE due to other staphylococcal strains (3, 13, 19).
Because of the abnormally thick cell walls of VISA strains, which apparently act as a sink for vancomycin, novel treatment strategies directed against the cell wall may be considered in the future. In this regard, Climo et al. (10) and Patron et al. (18a) have recently shown that lysostaphin, a 27-kDa peptidase that specifically cleaves the pentaglycine cross-links unique to the cell wall of S. aureus, was significantly more active in vivo at reducing vegetation densities of an ORSA strain and a VISA strain, respectively, than vancomycin alone in the rabbit IE model. If the efficacy of lysostaphin is confirmed for VISA strains in this model, this agent may prove useful, either alone or in combination with conventional antibiotic agents, in the therapy of invasive VISA infections.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported in part by a research grant from Pfizer Inc., New York, N.Y.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Adult Infectious Diseases, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (Bldg. RB2, Room 225), 1000 West Carson St., Torrance, CA 90509. Phone: (310) 222-6422. Fax: (310) 782-2016. E-mail: Bayer{at}HUMC.EDU.
Present address: School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston,
Ontario, Canada K7L 2Y1.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bayer, A. S., D. Crowell, D. Bradley, J. Yih, and D. C. Norman. 1988. Differential antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in right-sided versus left-sided vegetations in experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis. J. Infect. Dis. 158:355-359[Medline]. |
| 2. | Bayer, A. S., and K. Lam. 1985. Efficacy of vancomycin plus rifampin in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro-in vivo correlations. J. Infect. Dis. 151:157-165[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Bayer, A. S.,
C. Li, and M. Ing.
1998.
Efficacy of trovafloxacin, a new quinolone antibiotic, in experimental staphylococcal endocarditis due to oxacillin-resistant strains.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1837-1841 |
| 4. |
Bayer, A. S., and D. C. Norman.
1990.
Valve-site specific pathogenetic differences between right-sided and left-sided bacterial endocarditis.
Chest
98:200-205 |
| 5. | Bayer, A. S., D. C. Norman, C. Y. Chiu, and C. Nast. 1989. Pathogenic effects of neutropenia, monocytopenia and steroid treatment in experimental Pseudomonas endocarditis. Chemotherapy 35:278-288[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Bayer, A. S., and J. Tu.
1990.
Chemoprophylactic efficacy against experimental endocarditis caused by a -lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci is associated with prolonged serum inhibitory activity.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:1068-1074 |
| 7. |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin United States, 1997.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
46(33):765-766[Medline].
|
| 8. |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin United States, 1997.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
46(35):813-815[Medline].
|
| 9. | Choi, C., A. S. Bayer, N. K. Fujita, K. Lam, L. B. Guze, and T. T. Yoshikawa. 1983. Therapy of experimental Pseudomonas endocarditis with high-dose amikacin and ticarcillin. Cheotherapy 29:303-312. |
| 10. |
Climo, M. W.,
R. L. Patron,
B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer.
1998.
Lysostaphin treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve endocarditis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1355-1360 |
| 11. | Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hore, et al. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673[Medline]. |
| 12. |
Hiramatsu, K.,
H. Hanaki,
T. Ino,
K. Yabuta,
T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover.
1997.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:135-136 |
| 13. |
Hirano, L., and A. S. Bayer.
1991.
-Lactam- -lactamase-inhibitor combinations are active in experimental endocarditis caused by -lactamase-producing oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:685-690 |
| 14. |
Kaatz, G. W.,
S. M. Seo,
J. R. Aeschlimann,
H. H. Houlihan,
R.-C. Mercier, and M. J. Rybak.
1998.
Efficacy of trovafloxacin against experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:254-256 |
| 15. |
Kim, Y. S.,
Q. Liu,
L. L. Chow,
H. F. Chambers, and M. G. Tauber.
1998.
Comparative efficacy of trovafloxacin in experimental endocarditis caused by ciprofloxacin-sensitive, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:3325-3327 |
| 16. | Moellering, R. C., Jr., C. Wennersten, and A. N. Weinberg. 1971. Studies on antibiotic synergism against enterococci. I. Bacteriologic studies. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 77:790-800. |
| 17. | Moreira, B., S. Boyle-Vavra, B. L. M. deJonge, and R. S. Daum. 1997. Increased production of penicillin-binding protein 2, increased detection of other penicillin-binding proteins, and decreased coagulase activity associated with glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1788-1793[Abstract]. |
| 18. | Murray, B. E. 1997. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Am. J. Med. 101:284-293. |
| 18a. |
Patron, R. L.,
M. W. Climo,
B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer.
1999.
Lysostaphin treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by a Staphylococcus aureus isolate with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1754-1755 |
| 19. |
Ramos, M. C.,
M. Ing,
E. Kim,
M. D. Witt, and A. S. Bayer.
1996.
Ampicillin-sulbactam is effective in prevention and therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by -lactam-producing coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:97-101[Abstract].
|
| 20. |
Sieradski, K., and A. Tomasz.
1997.
Inhibition of cell wall turnover and autolysis by vancomycin in a highly vancomycin-resistant mutant of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
179:2557-2566 |
| 21. |
Vincent, J.,
J. Venitz,
R. Teng,
B. A. Baris,
S. A. Willavize,
R. J. Polzer, and H. L. Friedman.
1997.
Pharmacokinetics and safety of trovafloxacin in healthy male volunteers following administration of single intravenous doses of the prodrug, alatrofloxacin.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
39:75-80 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»