Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1999, p. 2629-2634, Vol. 43, No. 11
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Kinetics of Antiviral Activity and Intracellular
Pharmacokinetics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease
Inhibitors in Tissue Culture
Michelina
Nascimbeni,1
Claire
Lamotte,2
Gilles
Peytavin,2
Robert
Farinotti,2 and
François
Clavel1,*
Laboratoire de Recherche Antivirale,
IMEA-INSERM,1 and Laboratoire de
Pharmacologie,2 Hôpital Bichat-Claude
Bernard, Paris, France
Received 3 February 1999/Returned for modification 23 May
1999/Accepted 30 August 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have examined the kinetics of the inhibition of human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particle infectivity by protease inhibitors (PIs) in cell culture, using either transfected HeLa cells
or infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as producers of
infectious virions. Both the kinetics of the initiation of antiviral
activity after addition of the PIs to these cultures and the kinetics
of restoration of virion infectivity after removal of the PIs from the
treated cultures were examined. We found that the kinetics of
initiation of particle infectivity inhibition produced by a high
extracellular concentration (5 µM) of the inhibitors were similar for
all five inhibitors tested: loss of particle infectivity was
perceptible as early as 1 h after the initiation of PI treatment
and increased gradually thereafter. By contrast, the durability of this
antiviral effect following removal of the drug from the culture varied
dramatically according to the drug studied. In transfected HeLa cells,
saquinavir and nelfinavir exerted the most prolonged inhibition, with
the half-lives of their antiviral activities being greater than 24 h, while ritonavir exerted an intermediate length of inhibition (18 h)
and indinavir and amprenavir exerted a reproducibly shorter length of
inhibition (5 h). For all five tested PIs, these kinetics were
significantly faster in PBMCs than in HeLa cells. The striking
differences in antiviral kinetics observed among the different PIs
appear mostly due to differences in their intracellular concentrations
and/or rates of cellular clearance. Our observations, although limited to tissue culture conditions, may help delineate the cellular parameters of the antiviral activities of HIV-1 PIs and further optimize the efficiencies of these antiretrovirals in vivo.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protease (PR) inhibitors (PIs) are
among the most active compounds used in the therapy of human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. These agents block the
activity of a virally encoded aspartic PR required for the assembly of
infectious viral particles (8, 12, 13). When used in
combination with nucleosidic or nonnucleosidic inhibitors of reverse
transcriptase, they can lead to long-term suppression of detectable
viral replication in treated patients (2, 6, 9, 15, 16).
However, because of the high risk of selection of resistant viral
variants in the course of suboptimal therapeutic regimens, successful
long-term HIV therapy has to be fully suppressive, with continuous
inhibition of virus replication in spite of discontinuous drug intake.
For most PIs, trough concentrations in plasma are generally above their
90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90s) for reference,
drug-sensitive, HIV-1 strains (3, 10, 11, 17, 24, 26).
However, little is known about the availability of PIs in some of the
tissue compartments that may be essential for HIV replication in vivo.
Therefore, one cannot exclude the possibility that in spite of
apparently satisfactory plasma pharmacokinetics, important fluctuations
in local drug concentrations can occur in other compartments, leading to subinhibitory trough levels of the drugs and to selection of resistant virus variants. This conclusion is supported by the observation of a significant correlation between the trough levels of
some PIs and the duration of the antiviral effects of these molecules
in vivo (25). In this context, the precise impact of short
lapses in the maintenance of an extracellular concentration of a PI on
the inhibition of HIV PR activity and on the inhibition of HIV
infectivity in infected cells is not known. The delay in PI antiviral
activity following addition of drug to virus-producing cells, as well
as the delay in restoration of HIV infectivity following removal of the
extracellular inhibitor from treated cells, has not been carefully
examined. Furthermore, although it has been shown that the
intracellular concentration of a PI is key to its antiviral activity
(4), very little is known of the intracellular
pharmacokinetic parameters of the antiviral activities of HIV-1 PIs.
Here we report that although all currently used HIV-1 PIs have
comparable kinetics of initiation of their antiviral activities on
virus-producing cells, PIs can differ dramatically in the durability of
their antiviral actions at the cellular level. We show that these
differences are related to major differences in the intracellular
concentration properties of the different compounds.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and viruses.
HeLa cells were maintained as
subconfluent monolayers in Dulbecco's modified minimal essential
medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal calf serum. P4 indicator cells (HeLa CD4
LTR-LacZ cells) were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum and
500 µg of G418 per ml as described previously (7).
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from healthy
blood donors, cultivated in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum,
stimulated with 1 µg of phytohemagglutinin (Wellcome) per ml, and
maintained in the presence of interleukin 2 (10% Lymphocult; Biotest
Diagnostics). The virus used in all experiments was derived from the
infectious proviral molecular clone pNL4-3 (1).
Transfections were performed with HeLa cells and 15 µg of plasmid
pNL4-3 in subconfluent 25-cm2 flasks in DMEM by the
calcium-phosphate coprecipitation procedure. Virus production by the
transfected and infected cultures was monitored by the HIV-1 p24 DuPont
core profile enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
HIV infectivity assays.
The single-cycle titers of the
recombinant viruses on P4 cells were determined. P4 cells are HeLa CD4
LTR-LacZ cells in which the expression of
-galactosidase is strictly
inducible by the HIV transactivator protein Tat and which allow precise
quantitation of HIV-1 infectivity based on a single cycle of
replication. Triplicate subconfluent P4 cells in 96-well plates were
infected in the presence of 20 µg of DEAE-dextran per ml. Twenty-four
hours after infection of P4 cells, the single-cycle titers of viruses
were determined by quantification of the
-galactosidase activity in
P4 lysates by a colorimetric assay (herein termed the CPRG assay) based
on cleavage of chlorophenol red-
-D-galactopyranoside
(CPRG) by
-galactosidase as described previously (14,
30).
PIs.
The following PIs were used: indinavir (IDV; Merck
Pharmaceuticals), ritonavir (RTV; Abbott Laboratories), saquinavir
(SQV; Roche Products), nelfinavir (NFV; Agouron Pharmaceuticals), and amprenavir (APV; Vertex Pharmaceuticals). All PIs were dissolved in
dimethyl sulfoxide (final concentration, 1 mM) and stored at
20°C
before use.
Effects of PIs on producer cells, target cells, or isolated viral
particles.
Virus-producing HeLa cells, transfected with pNL4-3 and
grown in 25-cm2 flasks, were trypsinized 24 h after
transfection, suspended in 10 ml of fresh DMEM, and plated in separate
wells of 24-well plates. These separate cultures, derived from the same
transfected cell population and therefore assumed to be equivalent in
their levels of virus production were then treated with increasing
concentrations of the different PIs for a total of 24 h before
supernatant harvest and titration of HIV infectivity on P4 cells as
described above. To measure the effect of PIs on target cells, P4 cells
were pretreated overnight in 96-well plates with serial dilutions of
the inhibitors and infected with the supernatant from untreated,
pNL4-3-transfected HeLa cells in the presence of the same amounts of
the inhibitors. The effect of PI treatment on isolated particles was
determined with particles freshly produced by transfected HeLa cells.
Supernatant harvested at 48 h after transfection was subjected to
treatment by the different PIs at a concentration of 5 µM for 0, 2, 4, and 8 h at 37°C. The infectious titers of these supernatants
were then compared with those of mock-treated supernatants from the same cultures.
Kinetics of initiation of the antiviral effects of PIs.
At
the peak of virus production, infected PBMCs or transfected HeLa cells
were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and trypsinized to
remove residual, cell-associated, infectious virions. The cells were
then suspended in fresh prewarmed medium and subcultured in six
separate 24-well plates at 4 × 106 cells in a volume
of 1 ml per well. Each well in these plates corresponded to an
individual time point in the follow-up. The cultures from five of these
six plates were then treated with one of the five PIs tested (final
concentration of 5 µM). The sixth plate, used as an untreated
control, was processed similarly to the other plates except that the PI
was omitted from the medium. At each time point, the medium of the
corresponding culture well in each of the plates was removed and stored
at 4°C before titration. In parallel, all of the other 1-ml cultures
of all the plates were washed and further incubated in PI-containing
medium. At the end of the follow-up, all stored supernatants were
analyzed for HIV infectivity on P4 cells by the CPRG protocol. The
inhibition of HIV infectivity at each time point by the different PIs
tested was expressed as a percentage of the HIV titer in the
supernatant from the untreated culture.
Kinetics of the restoration of HIV infectivity after removal of
PIs.
In a manner similar to that used in the experiment described
above, infected PBMCs or transfected HeLa cells at the peak of virus
production were washed in PBS, trypsinized, and split in the wells of
six separate 24-well plates, with 4 × 106 cells/well
in a final volume of 1 ml. Five of the plates were treated with a PI at
5 µM, while one plate was left untreated. Each well in these plates
corresponds to an individual time point. After 6 h at 37°C, the
culture medium was replaced by fresh inhibitor-containing medium and
the cells were cultivated for an additional 14-h period. The cultures
were then extensively washed and incubated in the absence of an
inhibitor, which marked the start of the kinetic follow-up. At each
time point, the supernatant from one of the wells in the plate was
removed and stored at 4°C while the culture media were changed in all
of the other wells. At the end of the follow-up, stored supernatants
were analyzed for HIV infectivity on P4 cells by the CPRG protocol.
Again, the inhibitory effect of a PI was expressed as a percentage of
the inhibition level in the untreated control.
Quantitation of cell-associated PI concentrations.
Concentrations of PIs in lysates of treated HeLa cells or PBMCs were
determined for IDV, SQV, and RTV. Cells were treated as described above
under "Kinetics of the restoration of HIV infectivity after removal
of PIs," except that at each of the time points, cells from the
corresponding well were washed and suspended in 300 µl of culture
medium. The resulting cell suspensions were diluted in sodium borate
buffer (100 mM, pH 9.5) and sonicated for 10 min. For the determination
of IDV concentration (29), the cell lysates were subjected
to repeated liquid-liquid extraction with a mixture of
isopropanol-chloroform, and IDV concentrations were determined by a
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure with UV
detection at 210 nm. The lower limit of detection was 5 ng/ml. The
interassay coefficient of variation for quality control was 9.6%. SQV
concentrations were determined after a double-step and back
liquid-liquid extraction, evaporation, and injection in an HPLC system
coupled to a photodiode array detector. The detection wavelength was
240 nm. The lower limit of detection was 10 ng/ml, and the interassay
coefficient of variation was 10.4%. For the extraction of RTV, cell
lysates were combined with a solution of ethyl acetate-hexane,
sonicated for 10 min, and subjected to liquid-liquid extraction as
previously described (23). RTV concentrations were
determined by HPLC, with UV detection at 210 nm. The lower limit of
detection was 30 ng/ml, and the interassay coefficient of variation was
6.7%. All methods of monitoring PI levels were found to be linear and
specific, and results were reproducible. Standards and control samples
were prepared in bovine serum and treated in the same way as the cell
lysate samples. Quality-control samples were prepared by dissolving the
stock sample in bovine serum to final concentrations of 5, 15, 150, and
1,000 ng/ml for IDV; 27, 135, and 360 ng/ml for SQV; and 1, 3, 9, and
12.5 mg/liter for RTV and by storing them at
80°C.
 |
RESULTS |
Evaluation of the antiviral activities of HIV-1 PIs on
virus-producing cells versus those on target cells.
We first
wished to ascertain, as previously shown by other authors with a
different system (18, 20), that HIV PIs are active against
HIV infectivity upon treatment of virion-producing cells but that they
remain inactive upon treatment of target cells. To evaluate the effect
of PI treatment of virus-producing cells, transfected HeLa cells were
trypsinized and split in separate cultures that were subsequently
treated with different concentrations of the five different PIs.
Supernatants harvested 24 h later from these subcultures were
titrated on
-galactosidase indicator P4 cells on the basis of a
single cycle of HIV-1 replication. Since virus-producing cells in the
different subcultures were derived from the same transfected culture,
we observed that their levels of HIV-1 production were similar (not
shown). As shown in Fig. 1A, a dramatic
decrease in the infectious titers of the supernatants from IDV-treated
HeLa cultures, relative to those of untreated cells, was observed.
Similar results were obtained with the other tested PIs (data not
shown). The effect of PI treatment of target cells was examined by
treating P4 cells for 16 h before exposing them to a stock of
infectious HIV-1 particles from transfected HeLa cultures and by
maintaining the concentration of the inhibitor during the time of
infection of the P4 cells. No significant change in HIV infectious
titer was observed (Fig. 1B for the experiment with IDV; data not shown
for the other PIs). Since the P4 titer of HIV-1 is a reflection of the
early stages of viral replication up to the production of the Tat
transactivator, this result indicates that the activity of the HIV-1
protease is not required during these stages. The effect of treatment
of isolated particles was also examined. Particles harvested from
transfected HeLa cells were subjected to treatment by a single
concentration of PIs (5 µM) for different times at 37°C and then
used to infect P4 cells. No significant effect of treatment of isolated
particles on their infectious titer could be detected (Fig. 1C for
results with IDV; data not shown for the other PIs). Overall, these
results show that the protease of HIV-1 is accessible to inhibition by
PIs only upon treatment of virus-producing cells.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Antiviral activities of IDV, an inhibitor of HIV-1 PR,
on HIV-1 producer cells, target cells, and isolated virions. (A)
Transfected, virus-producing HeLa cells were treated for 24 h with
increasing concentrations of IDV, and the culture supernatants were
evaluated for HIV infectivity on the basis of a single cycle of virus
replication on indicator P4 cells. (B) Target indicator P4 cells were
treated overnight with increasing concentrations of IDV and then
infected with virus-containing supernatant from untreated, transfected
HeLa cells in the presence of the same concentrations of IDV as those
used in the pretreatment period. (C) Supernatant from transfected HeLa
cells was subjected to treatment with 5 µM IDV for the indicated
periods and used to infect P4 cells. The results are the means of
results from at least two independent experiments and are expressed as
percentages of results for untreated controls. Results are relative to
those for untreated HeLa cells (A), untreated P4 cells (B), and
untreated virus (C).
|
|
Kinetics of the initiation of antiviral activities by different PI
molecules.
The kinetics of HIV inhibition by PIs was examined with
two distinct virus production systems: transfected HeLa cells and infected PBMCs, which were treated at the peak of virus production. Although HeLa cells may lack some relevance to the in vivo situation, these cells allow synchronous production of virus, and because they are
not reinfectible by HIV, no effect of PIs on the number of
virus-producing cells is anticipated. On the other hand, infection of
the more relevant PBMCs is dependent upon virus propagation within a
heterogeneous cell population, in which treatment by PIs affects the
number of infected cells as well as the viability parameters of the
cultures, even upon short periods of treatment.
In HeLa cells a rapid inhibition of HIV particle infectivity was found
for each of the PI molecules tested (Fig.
2A). A significant decrease in particle
infectivity was perceptible as early as 1 h after the start of the
treatment, less than 25% residual infectivity was measured after
4 h of treatment, and full inhibition was obtained in 12 h.
In infected PBMCs (Fig. 2B), the kinetics of inhibition were even
faster: a drop in virion infectivity of more than 50% was measured
after 1 h of treatment, while near complete inhibition was seen
after 6 h of treatment. It has to be noted, however, that in
PBMCs, a small (less than 5%) but reproducible residual infectivity
was still measurable at 8 and 12 h after the start of the
treatment, with full inhibition visible only at 24 h (data not
shown). This effect could be explained by small amounts of residual,
trypsinization-resistant infectious particles that had assembled and
matured before drug treatment.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Kinetics of initiation of the antiviral activities of
five different HIV-1 PIs. Transfected HeLa cells (A) or infected PBMCs
(B) were treated with 5 µM concentrations of each of the indicated
PIs. Before treatment, all cells were trypsinized to remove unaffected,
infectious virions. The infectivity of the newly assembled virions,
produced in the presence of a PI, was determined by single-cycle
tritration on P4 cells at different time intervals and is expressed as
a percentage of the result for an untreated control. The results are
means from three independent experiments with HeLa cells and two
independent experiments with PBMCs.
|
|
Kinetics of the recovery of HIV-1 particle infectivity following
removal of extracellular PIs.
In these experiments, HIV-producing
cells were treated with PI until full inhibition of infectivity was
obtained; extracellular drugs were then removed from the culture
medium, and particle infectivity was monitored over time. As shown in
Fig. 3A, in HeLa cells, we observed
dramatic differences in the kinetics of restoration of virion
infectivity according to the inhibitor used. For IDV and APV, a rapid
recovery of virus infectivity was observed, with more than 75% of
virus infectivity being recovered at 8 h after removal of the
drugs from the cultures. For RTV, the speed of restoration of
infectivity was intermediate, with a 40% recovery at 8 h, which
subsequently gradually increased. By contrast, for SQV and NFV, a
prolonged inhibition of virus infectivity was measured: at 24 h
after removal of the inhibitor from the culture, no virus infectivity
was recovered in SQV-treated cultures and only 20% of the virus
infectivity was recovered in NFV-treated cultures. Overall, in HeLa
cells, the half-lives of the antiviral activities of the different PIs
was 5 h for APV and IDV, between 12 and 24 h for RTV, and
above 24 h for SQV and NFV.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Kinetics of the restoration of the infectivity of HIV-1
after removal of PIs from the producer cell cultures. Transfected HeLa
cells (A) or infected PBMCs (B) that had been treated with 5 µM
concentrations of each of the indicated PIs for 20 h, resulting in
the production of noninfectious virus, were washed and incubated in
drug-free medium. The infectivity of the newly released virus in the
supernatant was measured by single-cycle titration on P4 cells at
different time intervals and is expressed as a percentage of the result
for an untreated control. The results are means from three independent
experiments with HeLa cells and two independent experiments with
PBMCs.
|
|
In infected PBMCs, the kinetics of restoration of virus infectivity was
significantly faster than in transfected HeLa cells.
However, the
striking differences observed in the HeLa cells were
readily
perceptible in PBMCs, with the different PIs ranking in
the same order
as in HeLa cells. Indeed, recovery from the inhibition
by IDV and APV
was the fastest, recovery from RTV was intermediate,
and recovery from
SQV and NFV inhibition was the slowest. The
half-lives of the antiviral
activities of PIs in PBMCs were calculated
as 1 to 2 h for APV and
IDV, 3 h for RTV, and approximately 8
h for SQV and NFV.
Unlike in the HeLa cell experiments, we found
that with all inhibitors,
virus infectivity recovered at 24 h
from treated PBMCs was greater
than that from the untreated control.
This result is likely to stem
from the effect of PIs on the propagation
of virus within the PBMC
population, which should result in differences
in the number and/or in
the viability of virus-producing cells
between the treated and
untreated
cultures.
Intracellular pharmacokinetics of PIs.
To evaluate whether the
observed differences between the kinetics of the antiviral activities
of distinct PI molecules were due to differences affecting their
intrinsic antiviral activities or to differences in their intracellular
pharmacokinetic properties, we measured the kinetics of decay of
cell-associated PIs in cells treated with inhibitors and further
cultivated in drug-free medium. As shown in Fig.
4A, we found that the concentration of PI
in lysates of treated HeLa cells, immediately after removal of drug from the medium and trypsinization of the cells, differed dramatically according to the drug studied. The concentration of SQV at time zero
was the highest of the three studied molecules (1,800 nM/106 cells in 300 µl), followed by RTV (260 nM), while
the concentration of IDV in cell lysates was below the limit of
detection by the HPLC method used in this study. The concentration of
PI in the lysates decreased rapidly over time for both RTV and SQV.
However, since the initial concentration of drug in the cell lysates
was much higher for SQV, and in spite of the rapid clearance of the drug from the treated cells, the amounts of SQV in the lysates were
still significantly above the limit of detection at 4 and 8 h
after drug removal, which was not the case for RTV and for IDV. The
striking differences observed here in the concentrations of
cell-associated SQV, RTV, and IDV appear to fully correlate with our
findings on the half-lives of the antiviral activities of these three
PIs, for which it was found that SQV has the longest antiviral
half-life, RTV has an intermediate antiviral half-life, and IDV has the
shortest antiviral half-life.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Drug concentrations in lysates of PI-treated cells after
removal of the drugs from the culture medium. HeLa cells (A) or PBMCs
(B) were treated with 5 µM IDV, RTV, or SQV for 20 h, washed,
and incubated in drug-free medium. At the indicated times, cells were
washed and lysed and the concentration of each of the drugs in the cell
lysates was determined by HPLC. Results are from one experiment that
was representative of three independent experiments and are expressed
in nanomolar units in a 300-µl lysate, corresponding to
106 cells. The limits of the sensitivity of the measurement
method are 0.5 nM for IDV and 16 nM for RTV and SQV.
|
|
The same findings were made, on a different scale, when we analyzed the
kinetics of the amounts of PBMC-associated PIs in
culture. As shown in
Fig.
4B, SQV was again the molecule for which
the highest concentration
was detectable at the earliest time
point after removal of the drug
from the medium. In PBMCs, we
could not detect either cell-associated
RTV or IDV at any of the
time points. The lower amounts of
cell-associated PIs in PBMCs
appear to correlate with the shorter
antiviral activities of PIs
in these cells, compared to values obtained
with HeLa
cells.
Time of recovery of HIV infectivity as a function of the initial
dose of PI.
To further demonstrate that the recovery of HIV
infectivity following removal of a PI from the culture is essentially a
function of the clearance of the drug from treated cells, we measured
the recovery of virus infectivity over time after removal of SQV from cultures treated for 24 h with different concentrations of the drug. As shown in Fig. 5, there was a
strong relationship between the amount of drug used to initiate
inhibition of HIV infectivity and the duration of that inhibition.
After an initial treatment of 19 nM SQV, the recovery of virus
infectivity was rapid, with an antiviral half-life of approximately
4 h; at 78 nm, it was around 6 h, and at 312 nM, it was
around 15 h. After a 1,250 nM SQV initial treatment, the recovery
of HIV infectivity at 24 h after removal of the drug was 35% of
that of untreated virus and at 5,000 nM, as found in previous
experiments, there was no recovery of virus infectivity over the 24-h
follow-up period. These results emphasize that the durability of the
inhibition of HIV infectivity by PIs at the cellular level is
essentially dependent upon the concentration of inhibitor targeted to
the infected cell.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Kinetics of the restoration of HIV infectivity from
cultures treated with different concentrations of SQV and further
incubated in the absence of drug. Transfected HeLa cells that had been
treated with SQV at the indicated concentrations for 20 h, all of
which treatments resulted in the production of noninfectious virus,
were washed and incubated in drug-free medium. The infectivity of the
newly released virus in the supernatant was measured by single-cycle
titration on P4 cells at different time intervals and is expressed as a
percentage of the result with an untreated control. The results are the
means of values from three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The goal of antiretroviral therapy of HIV disease is long-term
suppression of HIV replication, which should prevent the emergence of
resistant variants. Therefore, many attempts have been made to maximize
the potency, the stability, and the durability of the antiviral effects
of drugs used in HIV therapy. In vivo, the concentration of antivirals
in plasma or tissues is subjected to temporal fluctuations, which are
largely dependent upon the general pharmacokinetic properties of the
drug used (3, 17, 22, 24, 26). In treated HIV-infected
subjects, the amplitudes of these fluctuations can differ widely from
one inhibitor to another, from one tissue compartment to another, and
perhaps even from one subject to another. However, the virological
impact of such fluctuations is not known. Therefore, our study was
designed to evaluate the kinetics of viral infectivity inhibition by
PIs in the context of large and severe fluctuations of extracellular drug concentrations. We found that HIV-1 infectivity drops rapidly following exposure of virus-producing cells to a high concentration of
a PI, which was true for all tested PIs. Conversely, we found that the
kinetics of restoration of virion infectivity following removal of PIs
from producer cell cultures vary dramatically from one inhibitor to
another. In brief, APV and IDV exerted the shortest inhibition, SQV and
NFV exerted prolonged inhibition, while RTV exerted intermediate inhibition.
The kinetics of recovery of HIV infectivity from inhibition of PR
function by PIs should be essentially dependent upon three factors: (i)
the reversibility of PR inhibition at the molecular level, (ii) the
kinetics of de novo production of inhibitor-free PR, and (iii) the
kinetics of a decrease in the local concentration of an inhibitor at
the site of virus assembly. We consider it unlikely that the first of
these three parameters explains the marked differences in the antiviral
kinetics of the tested drugs. Although there exist slight differences
in the IC50s and IC90s of different PIs in
tissue culture, their molecular parameters of HIV-1 PR inhibition in
vitro are comparable (11, 13, 19, 21, 27). De novo PR
synthesis, which is certainly a factor in virus recovery from PI
treatment, cannot explain the differences in kinetics between the drugs
since all PIs were tested on the same cell systems. In fact, we found
that the differences in antiviral kinetics of PIs could be essentially
attributed to striking differences in the intracellular
pharmacokinetics of these molecules. Indeed, the correlation between
the durability of HIV inhibition by PIs and the concentration of drug
in cell lysates is particularly striking. SQV, the drug that exhibited
the most prolonged antiviral activity, also displayed the highest cell
lysate concentration immediately after removal of the drug from medium,
and although the clearance of SQV from the cells was rapid, we surmise
that there was still enough cell-associated drug for full inhibition of
HIV infectivity in HeLa cells after 24 h. IDV, on the other hand,
had the shortest antiviral half-life and displayed undetectable concentrations in HeLa and PBMC lysates. We cannot provide here a
satisfactory explanation for the dramatic differences observed in
cell-associated amounts of SQV and IDV. Whether they relate to
differences in entry or efflux, or to some other phenomenon involving
the affinities of the drugs towards particular cell structures or
proteins, remains to be resolved. Because the cell lysates in which
drug concentrations were measured had to be prepared after several
washes, the absolute values that were measured in the lysates are not
actual cytoplasmic concentrations and have to be interpreted with
caution. Our experiments were comparative in essence and aimed at
delineating differences in the antiviral and intracellular behaviors of
different molecules. Clearly, further studies of the kinetics of cell
association of HIV-1 PIs and of the kinetics of their clearance from
treated cells are required. Overall, our findings are reminiscent of
the postantibiotic effect described for some antibacterial agents
(5, 28). Several mechanisms are invoked in postantibiotic
effects, including persistent nonlethal inhibition of bacterial growth
following removal of the antibiotic from the culture and persistence of
the drug within bacterial cells. This persistence is comparable to what
we can conclude from our experiments, where the prolonged antiviral
activities of PIs appeared related to high intracellular concentrations
of drugs. Recalling the effort that has been devoted to improving the
general pharmacokinetic properties of HIV PIs, we believe that a
similar effort should now be devoted to carefully evaluating the
parameters of the intracellular pharmacokinetics of existing and future
antivirals of this and other classes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank John Leonard and Fabrizio Mammano for their interest in
this work and for helpful suggestions.
This study was supported by grants from the Agence Nationale de
Recherche sur le Sida (ANRS). M.N. is the recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the ANRS.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de
Recherche Antivirale, IMEA/INSERM, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard,
46, rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. Phone: 331 4025 6363. Fax:
331 4025 8780. E-mail: clavel{at}bichat.inserm.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adachi, A.,
H. E. Gendelmann,
S. Koenig,
T. Folks,
R. Willey,
A. Rabson, and M. A. Martin.
1986.
Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and nonhuman cells transfected with an infectious molecular clone.
J. Virol.
59:284-291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Autran, B.,
G. Carcelain,
T. S. Li,
C. Blanc,
D. Mathez,
R. Tubiana,
C. Katlama,
P. Debre, and J. Leibowitch.
1997.
Positive effects of combined antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ T cell homeostasis and function in advanced HIV disease.
Science
277:112-116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Barry, M.,
S. Gibbons,
D. Back, and F. Mulcahy.
1997.
Protease inhibitors in patients with HIV disease. Clinically important pharmacokinetic considerations.
Clin. Pharmacokinet.
32:194-209[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bilello, J. A.,
P. A. Bilello,
K. Stellrecht,
J. Leonard,
D. W. Norbeck,
D. J. Kempf,
T. Robins, and G. L. Drusano.
1996.
Human serum alpha 1 acid glycoprotein reduces uptake, intracellular concentration, and antiviral activity of A-80987, an inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:1491-1497[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Bundtzen, R. W.,
A. U. Gerber,
D. L. Cohn, and W. A. Craig.
1981.
Postantibiotic suppression of bacterial growth.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
3:28-37[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Carpenter, C. C.,
M. A. Fischl,
S. M. Hammer,
M. S. Hirsch,
D. M. Jacobsen,
D. A. Katzenstein,
J. S. Montaner,
D. D. Richman,
M. S. Saag,
R. T. Schooley,
M. A. Thompson,
S. Vella,
P. G. Yeni, and P. A. Volberding.
1998.
Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1998: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society USA Panel.
JAMA
280:78-86[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Charneau, P.,
G. Mirambeau,
P. Roux,
S. Paulous,
H. Buc, and F. Clavel.
1994.
HIV-1 reverse transcription: a termination step at the center of the genome.
J. Mol. Biol.
241:651-662[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Coffin, J. M.
1991.
Retroviridae and their replication, p. 645-708.
In
B. Fields (ed.), Virology, 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York, N.Y
|
| 9.
|
Deeks, S. G.,
M. Smith,
M. Holodniy, and J. O. Kahn.
1997.
HIV-1 protease inhibitors: a review for clinicians.
JAMA
277:145-153[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Denissen, J. F.,
B. A. Grabowski,
M. K. Johnson,
A. M. Buko,
D. J. Kempf,
S. B. Thomas, and B. W. Surber.
1997.
Metabolism and disposition of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor ritonavir (ABT-538) in rats, dogs, and humans.
Drug Metab. Dispos.
25:489-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Dorsey, B. D.,
R. B. Levin,
S. L. McDaniel,
J. P. Vacca,
J. P. Guare,
P. L. Darke,
J. A. Zugay,
E. A. Emini,
W. A. Schleif, and J. C. Quintero.
1994.
L-735,524: the design of a potent and orally bioavailable HIV protease inhibitor.
J. Med. Chem.
37:3443-3451[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dreyer, G. B.,
B. W. Metcalf,
T. A. Tomaszek, Jr.,
T. J. Carr,
A. C. D. Chandler,
L. Hyland,
S. A. Fakhoury,
V. W. Magaard,
M. L. Moore,
J. E. Strickler, et al.
1989.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease in vitro: rational design of substrate analogue inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:9752-9756[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Erickson, J.,
D. Neidhart,
J. VanDrie,
D. Kempf,
X. Wang,
D. Norbeck,
J. Plattner,
J. Rittenhouse,
M. Turon,
N. Wideburg,
W. Kohlbrenner,
R. Simmer,
R. Helfrick,
D. Paul, and M. Knigge.
1990.
Design, activity, and 2.8 Å crystal structure of a C2 symmetric inhibitor complexed to HIV-1 protease.
Science
249:527-533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Eustice, D.,
P. Feldman,
A. Colberg-Poley,
R. Buckery, and R. Neubauer.
1991.
A sensitive method for the detection of -galactosidase in transfected mammalian cells.
BioTechniques
11:739-743.
|
| 15.
|
Gulick, R. M.,
J. W. Mellors,
D. Havlir,
J. J. Eron,
C. Gonzalez,
D. McMahon,
D. D. Richman,
F. T. Valentine,
L. Jonas,
A. Meibohm,
E. A. Emini, and J. A. Chodakewitz.
1997.
Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy.
N. Engl. J. Med.
337:734-739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Havlir, D. V., and J. M. Lange.
1998.
New antiretrovirals and new combinations.
AIDS
12:S165-S174.
|
| 17.
|
Hoetelmans, R. M.,
P. L. Meenhorst,
J. W. Mulder,
D. M. Burger,
C. H. Koks, and J. H. Beijnen.
1997.
Clinical pharmacology of HIV protease inhibitors: focus on saquinavir, indinavir, and ritonavir.
Pharm. World Sci.
19:159-175[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Jacobsen, H.,
L. Ahlborn-Laake,
R. Gugel, and J. Mous.
1992.
Progression of early steps of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in the presence of an inhibitor of viral protease.
J. Virol.
66:5087-5091[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kageyama, S.,
D. T. Hoekzema,
Y. Murakawa,
E. Kojima,
T. Shirasaka,
D. J. Kempf,
D. W. Norbeck,
J. Erickson, and H. Mitsuya.
1994.
A C2 symmetry-based HIV protease inhibitor, A77003, irreversibly inhibits infectivity of HIV-1 in vitro.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10:735-743[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kaplan, A. H.,
M. Manchester,
T. Smith,
Y. L. Yang, and R. Swanstrom.
1996.
Conditional human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease mutants show no role for the viral protease early in virus replication.
J. Virol.
70:5840-5844[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Kempf, D. J.,
K. C. Marsh,
J. F. Denissen,
E. McDonald,
S. Vasavanonda,
C. A. Flentge,
B. E. Green,
L. Fino,
C. H. Park,
X. P. Kong, and D. W. Norbeck.
1995.
ABT-538 is a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus protease and has high oral bioavailability in humans.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2484-2488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Markowitz, M.,
M. Conant,
A. Hurley,
R. Schluger,
M. Duran,
J. Peterkin,
S. Chapman,
A. Patick,
A. Hendricks,
G. J. Yuen,
W. Hoskins,
N. Clendeninn, and D. D. Ho.
1998.
A preliminary evaluation of nelfinavir mesylate, an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 protease, to treat HIV infection.
J. Infect. Dis.
177:1533-1540[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Marsh, K. C.,
E. Eiden, and E. McDonald.
1997.
Determination of ritonavir, a new HIV protease inhibitor, in biological samples using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.
J. Chromatogr. B
704:307-313.
|
| 24.
|
Merry, C.,
M. G. Barry,
F. Mulcahy,
M. Ryan,
J. Heavey,
J. F. Tjia,
S. E. Gibbons,
A. M. Breckenridge, and D. J. Back.
1997.
Saquinavir pharmacokinetics alone and in combination with ritonavir in HIV-infected patients.
AIDS
11:F29-F33[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Molla, A.,
M. Korneyeva,
Q. Gao,
S. Vasavanonda,
P. J. Schipper,
H. M. Mo,
M. Markowitz,
T. Chernyavskiy,
P. Niu,
N. Lyons,
A. Hsu,
G. R. Granneman,
D. D. Ho,
C. A. Boucher,
J. M. Leonard,
D. W. Norbeck, and D. J. Kempf.
1996.
Ordered accumulation of mutations in HIV protease confers resistance to ritonavir.
Nat. Med.
2:760-766[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Moyle, G. J.,
M. Youle,
C. Higgs,
J. Monaghan,
W. Prince,
S. Chapman,
N. Clendeninn, and M. R. Nelson.
1998.
Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of the potent, specific human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir: results of a phase I/II trial and extended follow-up in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
38:736-743[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Patick, A.,
H. Mo,
M. Markowitz,
K. Appelt,
B. Wu,
L. Musick,
V. Kalish,
S. Kaldor,
S. Reich,
D. Ho, and S. Webber.
1996.
Antiviral and resistance studies of AG1343, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus protease.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:292-297[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Spivey, J. M.
1992.
The postantibiotic effect.
Clin. Pharm.
11:865-875[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Woolf, E.,
T. Au,
H. Haddix, and B. Matuszewski.
1995.
Determination of L-735 524, an human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor, in human plasma and urine via high-performance liquid chromatography with column switching.
J. Chromatogr. A
692:45-52[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Zennou, V.,
F. Mammano,
S. Paulous,
D. Mathez, and F. Clavel.
1998.
Loss of viral fitness associated with multiple Gag and Gag-Pol processing defects in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants selected for resistance to protease inhibitors in vivo.
J. Virol.
72:3300-3306[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1999, p. 2629-2634, Vol. 43, No. 11
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Fulco, P. P., Vora, U. B, Bearman, G. M.
(2006). Acid Suppressive Therapy and the Effects on Protease Inhibitors. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
40: 1974-1983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ford, J., Khoo, S. H., Back, D. J.
(2004). The intracellular pharmacology of antiretroviral protease inhibitors. J Antimicrob Chemother
54: 982-990
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ford, J., Boffito, M., Wildfire, A., Hill, A., Back, D., Khoo, S., Nelson, M., Moyle, G., Gazzard, B., Pozniak, A.
(2004). Intracellular and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir-Ritonavir, Administered at 1,600/100 Milligrams Once Daily in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 2388-2393
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bulgheroni, E., Citterio, P., Croce, F., Lo Cicero, M., Vigano, O., Soster, F., Chou, T.-C., Galli, M., Rusconi, S.
(2004). Analysis of protease inhibitor combinations in vitro: activity of lopinavir, amprenavir and tipranavir against HIV type 1 wild-type and drug-resistant isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother
53: 464-468
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hsu, A., Isaacson, J., Brun, S., Bernstein, B., Lam, W., Bertz, R., Foit, C., Rynkiewicz, K., Richards, B., King, M., Rode, R., Kempf, D. J., Granneman, G. R., Sun, E.
(2003). Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Combination with Efavirenz and Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Extensively Pretreated Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 350-359
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, S.-W., Aldovini, A.
(2002). RNA Incorporation Is Critical for Retroviral Particle Integrity after Cell Membrane Assembly of Gag Complexes. J. Virol.
76: 11853-11865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khoo, S. H., Hoggard, P. G., Williams, I., Meaden, E. R., Newton, P., Wilkins, E. G., Smith, A., Tjia, J. F., Lloyd, J., Jones, K., Beeching, N., Carey, P., Peters, B., Back, D. J.
(2002). Intracellular Accumulation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 3228-3235
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qari, S. H., Magre, S., García-Lerma, J. G., Hussain, A. I., Takeuchi, Y., Patience, C., Weiss, R. A., Heneine, W.
(2001). Susceptibility of the Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus to Reverse Transcriptase and Protease Inhibitors. J. Virol.
75: 1048-1053
[Abstract]
[Full Text]