Previous Article
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1999, p. 2819-2821, Vol. 43, No. 11
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Silver-Containing Polymers
 |
LETTER 1 |
We read with interest about the investigations of Kampf et al.
(2) concerning the antimicrobial activity of a new
silver-containing polymer. The use of silver may be regarded as an
effective non-resistance-inducing strategy to prevent device-related
infections. In vitro and in vivo experiments have been performed during
the recent years to develop potent antimicrobially acting silver-coated
devices. Most of the authors claimed strong antimicrobial efficacy of
silver-coated devices, and the industry launched several products on
the market. However, randomized clinical studies showing statistically
significant antimicrobial efficacy of silver-coated medical devices in
high-risk populations of patients are rare, dealt with small numbers of patients only, and are controversial (6). The largest
randomized controlled clinical study with 1,300 patients revealed no
significant differences in infection rates between silver-coated and
unmodified catheters (4), a finding which is in accordance
with the observations made by Kampf et al. (2).
How does silver work? The silver cation (Ag+) is a highly
reactive chemical structure which binds strongly to electron donor groups containing sulfur, oxygen, or nitrogen. Biological molecules generally contain all these components in the form of thio, amino, imidazole, carboxylate, and phosphate groups. Silver ions act by
displacing other essential metal ions such as Ca2+ or
Zn+. The binding of silver ions to bacterial DNA
(3) may inhibit a number of important transport processes,
such as phosphate and succinate uptake, and can interact with cellular
oxidation processes as well as the respiratory chain. The
Ag+-induced antibacterial killing rate is directly
proportional to Ag+ concentrations, typically acting at
multiple targets. The higher the silver ion concentration, the higher
the antimicrobial efficacy. The release rate of unbound, free silver
ion may also be correlated to the antimicrobial activity of thus-coated devices.
Kampf et al. neutralized the silver catheter by 5% horse serum.
Recently, we showed decreased activity of silver ions as a result of
the addition of albumin and NaCl to broth (5). MICs and
minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) for the bacterial strains
tested (Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, Staphylococcus
aureus ATCC 6538, and Staphylococcus epidermidis DSM
3269) increased with the addition of albumin to Mueller-Hinton (MH)
broth, especially for MH broth containing albumin and NaCl (from 1 to
10 mg/ml). Very high MBCs were also observed for Ag ions in bovine
serum (50-fold the broth MBC). This may be in accordance with the
findings of Williams and Williams (7) who showed by
microautoradiography that 3 mol of silver ions is bound specifically by
1 mol of albumin.
In an in vitro experiment, bacterial adhesion on polymeric devices was
investigated in the presence of albumin and NaCl at physiological
concentrations. Central venous catheters (nonimpregnated, aliphatic
polyurethane, 1.7-mm diameter; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) were cut
under sterile conditions into 1-cm pieces. These pieces were
transferred into bacterial suspension (
106 CFU/ml;
E. coli ATCC 11229, S. aureus ATCC 6538, or
S. epidermidis DSM 3269), remaining there for 2 h at
37°C. Afterwards, the catheter pieces were transferred into MH broth
containing silver nitrate (for E. coli, 32 µg/ml; for
S. aureus and S. epidermidis, 256 µg/ml),
albumin (0.2%), and NaCl (0.9%).
Contaminated catheter pieces were incubated for 24 or 48 h at
37°C. Thereafter, the catheter segments were removed by means of
sterile forceps, rinsed for 30 s under running tap water,
transferred individually into 1 ml of physiological saline (containing
0.1% polysorbate 80), and agitated vigorously for 60 s. After
agitation, the saline was diluted 1:10 or 1:100, and appropriate
volumes of each dilution were pipetted onto the surface of tryptic soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood and incubated aerobically for
48 h at 37°C. After each incubation period grown colonies were
counted and the number of adherent bacteria on catheter segments was calculated.
After 48 h of incubation, bacterial counts on the catheter
surfaces were less than that for the control without silver nitrate but
still measurable (Fig. 1).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Bacterial adhesion on polymeric surfaces in the presence
of highly toxic and bactericidal concentrations of silver nitrate (for
E. coli, 32 µg/ml; for S. aureus and S. epidermidis, 256 µg/ml). The broth (0.2% albumin, 0.9% NaCl)
remained sterile after 24 h, whereas adherent bacteria survived.
|
|
There is no doubt that silver ions are remarkably active against a
broad spectrum of bacteria. However, in an environment containing
albumin and halide ions, the antibacterial activity of silver ions will
be decreased as a result of specific absorption to albumin and
precipitation into insoluble silver chloride crystals. Once attached to
catheters, colonizing bacteria remain viable despite exposure even to
high concentrations of antimicrobial substances (1).
Therefore, silver-coated devices like those investigated by Kampf et
al. may be clinically effective only when the concentration of free
silver ions can be increased and when contact with albumin and Cl ions,
as well as possible cytotoxic effects, is minimized. For reproducible
inactivation of silver derivates we would like to recommend the
addition of albumin (0.2%) and physiological NaCl (0.9%) to fluid as
well as solid media.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Elliott, T. S. J.
1988.
Plastic devices: new field for old microbes.
Lancet
13:365-366.
|
| 2.
|
Kampf, G.,
C. Groß-Siestrup,
C. Wendt, and H. Martini.
1998.
Microbicidal activity of a new silver-containing polymer, SPI-ARGENT II.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2440-2442[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Modak, K., and C. Fox.
1973.
Binding of silver sulfadiazine in the cellular components of Pseudomonas aeroginosa.
Biochem. Pharm.
22:2392-2404.
|
| 4.
|
Riley, D. K.,
D. C. Classen,
L. E. Stevens, and J. P. Burke.
1995.
A large randomized clinical trial of a silver-impregnated urinary catheter: lack of efficacy and staphylococcal superinfection.
Am. J. Med.
98:349-358[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Schierholz, J. M.,
L. Wachol-Drebeck,
L. Lucas, and G. Pulverer.
1998.
Activity of silver ions in biological fluids.
Zentbl. Bakt.
287:411-420.
|
| 6.
|
Schierholz, J. M.,
L. Lucas, and G. Pulverer.
1998.
Silver coating of medical devices a review.
J. Hosp. Infect.
40:257-262[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Williams, R. L., and D. F. Williams.
1988.
Albumin adsorption on metal surfaces.
Biomaterials
9:206[Medline].
|
| | | | |
Jörg Michael Schierholz
Joseph Beuth
Gerhard Pulverer
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene University of Cologne Goldenfelsstrasse 19-21 50935 Cologne Germany
|
| | | | |
Dietmar-Pierre König
Department of Orthopedics University of Cologne 50931 Cologne Germany
|
 |
LETTER 2 |
My principal concerns with the study by Kampf et al. (4) are
the lack of references to previously published testing of SPI-ARGENT II
materials, the testing methodology selected, and the sweeping conclusion.
SPI-ARGENT II is a long-term surface treatment intended to reduce
thrombus formation and colonization of and adhesion to medical devices
by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. Since SPI-ARGENT II is
intended to prevent device-related infection, its effectiveness is
targeted towards microorganism adhesion and proliferation as opposed to
suppression of a widespread infection.
The effectiveness of SPI-ARGENT II has been demonstrated with both
clinical studies (1, 2) and in vivo animal models. Based on
their limited and inappropriate in vitro tests, Kampf et al. draw the
dramatic conclusion that "Its value for clinical use appears to be
doubtful." Their conclusion ignores the published clinical data
demonstrating effectiveness of SPI-ARGENT II for dialysis catheters,
the shortcomings of their in vitro experiment in modeling in vivo
results, and their own acknowledgment that "...the adhesive effect
of the polymer surface for bacteria and fungi is of importance..."
even though they "...did not investigate the adhesive effect
of SPI-ARGENT II..."
Any in vitro test intended to predict device-related infection in a
clinical setting should simulate the steps that occur during initial
adhesion and proliferation of microorganisms prior to colonization of a
device. This sequence begins with the exposure of a sterile device to a
small concentration of organisms. Measurement of the relative number of
organisms which adhere to and colonize treated versus untreated devices
provides a suitable means of comparison. An appropriate test should
measure only organisms attached to the device.
In the experiments described by Kampf et al. the investigators applied
between 1 × 106 and 2 × 107
organisms to the test surface. This high initial concentration of
organisms differs from the typical sequence that leads to device colonization in vivo. It is unrealistic to expect a nonantibiotic surface treatment, whose primary function is to prevent bacterial adhesion and colonization, to be effective in such a test.
In an example of an appropriate in vitro test, Biedlingmaier et al.
(3) studied bacterial adhesion and biofilm growth on ion-implanted tympanostomy tubes. After immersion for 5 days in inoculated, nutrient-rich media, tubes were rinsed and evaluated for
presence of adherent bacteria. These investigators found that, the
three microorganisms evaluated (Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus
epidermidis) readily colonized untreated tubes with dense
biofilms. Ion-implanted tubes, on the other hand, were free of
bacterial contamination.
The inappropriateness of the testing used by Kampf et al. is indicated
by the authors' own acknowledgment that "Lower inocula may yield
very different results and allow for differentiation."
The positive results from previous studies of SPI-AGRGENT II
effectiveness stand in stark contrast to the results of the study by
Kampf et al.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bambauer, R.,
P. Mestres,
R. Schiel, and P. Sioshansi.
1995.
New surface treatment technologies for catheters used for extracorporeal detoxification methods.
Dial. Transplant.
24:228-237.
|
| 2.
|
Bambauer, R.,
P. Schiel,
P. Mestres,
J. Klinkmann, and P. Sioshansi.
1996.
Scanning electron microscopic investigation of catheters for blood access.
Blood Purif.
14:249-256[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Biedlingmaier, J. F.,
R. Samaranayakc, and P. Whelan.
1998.
Resistance to biofilm formation on otologic implant materials.
Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
118:444-451[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Kampf, G.,
B. Dietze,
C. Große-Siestrup,
C. Wendt, and H. Martiny.
1998.
Microbicidal activity of a new silver-containing polymer, SPI-ARGENT II.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2440-2442.
|
| | | | |
Ronald S. Scharlack
Spire Corporation Bedford, Massachusetts
|
 |
AUTHOR'S REPLY |
We thank the authors of the two letters for the critical comments on
our article.
The aim of our study was to investigate only the microbicidal activity
of the silver-treated polymer as we outlined in the introduction. The
ability of the polymer to reduce thrombus formation and adhesion was
not the purpose of the investigation. That is why we are unable to
assess these potential qualities of the polymer. The criticism of the
test method by R. S. Scharlack is surprising to us because
most in vitro methods of demonstrating a lethal effect require a high
inoculum in the United States as well as in Europe, e.g., testing the
bactericidal activity of antiseptic products for hands. A reduction in
the number of viable organisms by 5 log10 units within a
given exposure time is usually necessary to demonstrate microbicidal
activity. Therefore, a high inoculum is justified and is not
inappropriate for testing as R. S. Scharlack tries to imply.
Critical evaluation of product claims by the manufacturer is in our
opinion the more appropriate way to deal with scientific data.
| | | | |
Günter Kampf
Beate Dietze
Constanze Wendt
Heike Martiny
Institut für Hygiene, Umweltmedizin und Arbeitsmedizin Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany
|
| | | | |
Christian Große-Siestrup
Tierexperimentelle Einrichtung Humboldt Universität Berlin, Germany
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 1999, p. 2819-2821, Vol. 43, No. 11
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.