Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 1999, p. 944-946, Vol. 43, No. 4
Laboratoire de Microbiologie,
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex,
France
Received 9 November 1998/Returned for modification 9 December
1998/Accepted 14 January 1999
Eighteen unrelated clinical isolates of Streptococcus
agalactiae with the M phenotype harbored an mef gene.
DNA sequencing showed that one of nine strains contained
mefA (producing one amino acid substitution),
whereas the remaining eight carried mefE (identity,
100%). Restriction analysis of PCR products indicated that the nine
other strains also contained mefE.
Streptococcus agalactiae
(group B streptococcus) is mainly responsible for meningitis and
septicemia in newborns; beta-lactam agents are the treatment of choice
of these infections, but macrolides and related drugs are useful
alternate therapy in allergic patients (2, 13). Until
recently, the only known mechanism of resistance to macrolides
in streptococci was target site modification by 23S rRNA
methylases, encoded by the erm genes. The Erm enzymes convey cross-resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and the
streptogramin B compounds (MLS), which is referred to as
MLSB phenotype (23). Since the late 1980s, a new
phenotype, designated M and consisting of resistance to 14- and
15-membered macrolides but susceptibility to 16-membered macrolides,
lincosamides, and streptogramins, has been recognized in group A
streptococci and pneumococci isolated in a number of countries (6,
8, 9, 15-17, 19, 21, 24, 25). The mechanism of this resistance
is a proton-dependent efflux system (4, 11, 21, 22), encoded
by mef genes: mefA in group A streptococci
(4) and mefE in pneumococci (22), which have 90% identity. mef genes have also been
detected very recently in group C streptococci (10).
Preliminary studies indicated that they might be widespread among other
streptococcal species, including S. agalactiae
(22). In addition, a novel efflux system, encoded by
mreA, distinct from the Mef pump, has been characterized in
a single strain of S. agalactiae which displayed
resistance to 14-, 15-, and 16-membered macrolides (5). The
aim of the present study was to determine the macrolide resistance
mechanism in 18 clinical strains of S. agalactiae bearing
the M phenotype.
These 18 nonredundant isolates (SB1 to SB18) were collected from
distinct patients in several laboratories in the southwest of France,
from 1993 to 1998. They were mainly recovered from genital samples of
adults and gastric fluid of neonates. Three clinical strains of
S. agalactiae, susceptible or expressing inducible or
constitutive MLSB phenotypes, were also used as controls.
Identification was done by conventional tests (13). MICs of
12 MLS drugs were determined by an agar dilution method in
Mueller-Hinton medium supplemented with 5% horse blood, with a final
inoculum of 105 CFU per spot (7). The strains
showed low-level resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides while
being fully susceptible to 16-membered macrolides, lincosamides, and
pristinamycin II (group A) and pristinamycin I (group B), even after
prolonged incubation at 37°C in aerobiosis (Table
1). MICs were slightly lower than those
obtained for the strains of group A streptococci (8, 15, 17,
25) or pneumococci (9, 18) with an M phenotype (MICs
of erythromycin at 4 to 8 mg/liter). Moreover, subinhibitory
concentrations of erythromycin (0.005 to 8 µg/ml) or lincomycin
(0.0002 to 0.5 µg/ml) did not induce MLS resistance in the first nine
erythomycin-resistant strains of S. agalactiae that we
tested (SB1 to SB9). Finally, the possibility that an erm gene was present was excluded by two experiments: dot
blot DNA hybridization under conditions of low and high
stringencies performed by using radioactively labelled
ermAM probe, and amplification by PCR by using
degenerate oligonucleotides corresponding to conserved amino acid
motifs in Erm methylases (1).
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Presence of mefA and mefE
Genes in Streptococcus agalactiae
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Susceptibility of S. agalactiae clinical
strains to MLS antibiotics
Then, DNA amplification by PCR was performed with genomic DNA of
the 18 isolates, using primers specific for the mef genes, i.e., mef1 (5'-ATGGAAAATACAACAATTGGAAAC-3';
5'-ATG translation start codon is underlined) and
mef8 (5'-TTATTTAAATCTAATTTTCTAACCTC-3'; TAA-3' translation stop codon is underlined).
Amplification products of 1.2 kb were obtained in all cases, in
contrast with negative controls (DNA of a susceptible strain or strains
with an MLSB phenotype). The presence of an
erythromycin resistance gene was further characterized in
half of the strains (SB1 to SB9). Mating between the nine
isolates and a streptomycin-resistant mutant of S. agalactiae BM132 as the recipient strain was carried
out on filters (7). No transfer was observed, in
contrast to the positive control (S. agalactiae BM132
harboring an ermAM gene on a conjugative plasmid;
transfer frequency, 10
5). Furthermore, plasmid
DNA was not detected after extraction and analysis by
electrophoresis on agarose gel (14).
Erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes was
found in one case to be transferable by conjugation to
streptococci or Enterococcus faecalis recipients,
although no plasmid DNA could be detected (15). However, no
information has been provided on the
transferability of mef genes (22).
For the same nine strains, the PCR products were directly sequenced on
both strands by an automated fluorescent sequencing method. The
analysis showed that one of these amplimers (pSB1) was identical to
mefA (4), except for two substitutions: one silent mutation at position 471 (T
C) and one mutation at position 239 (A
C) that led to the replacement of a methionine by a
valine at position 77. This is the first description of the
mefA gene in S. agalactiae. Hybridization
experiments, using this amplified product (pSB1) radioactively
labelled and used as a probe, gave a weaker signal with the eight
remaining amplified products (pBS2 to pBS9) than with the positive
control (pBS1). Indeed, all nucleotide sequences of pBS2 to pBS9
exhibited 100% identity with the original mefE gene
(GenBank accession no. U83667) (22). There was no apparent
clustering of our strains. However, as a confirmation, epidemiological
typing by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA was performed, since this
method has been found to be discriminant for this species
(3). Using primer AP12h (5'-CGGCCCCTGT-3'; 80%
G+C content) and the method described elsewhere (3),
the SB1 to SB9 strains of S. agalactiae were found to
exhibit different patterns and thus were concluded to be
multiclonal isolates.
Finally, the PCR products obtained with the nine other strains (SB10 to SB18) were analyzed after restriction by four endonucleases (AccI, ClaI, HindIII, and HhaI) designed to digest differentially mefA and mefE. The nine amplimers gave restriction patterns consistent with mefE rather than with mefA. These findings confirmed the predominance of mefE among S. agalactiae strains with an M phenotype. The distribution of the mef genes has been studied only in pneumococci, where mefE was exclusively found (18). Enzymatic restriction combined with PCR amplification should be helpful to determine the relative prevalence of the mef genes among various streptococcal species.
In the late 1980s, a sudden increase in the frequency of erythromycin-resistant streptococci was observed in several countries (including the United Kingdom, Finland, and the United States) (6, 15, 16, 19, 25), and this was probably related to the increased prescription of this antibiotic or its then newly available semisynthetic derivatives (16). In these countries, the prevalence of the M phenotype (and/or mef genes) among the erythromycin-resistant streptococci is very high: 38 to 97% in group A streptococci (8, 17, 20), 95% in group C streptococci (10), and 41 to 85% in pneumococci (9, 18, 20). In France, no national data are available. In our area, between 1996 and 1997, the percentages of erythromycin-resistant strains at different hospitals ranged from 31 to 56% for pneumococci, from 0 to 20% for group A and group C streptococci, and from 8 to 16% for group B and group G streptococci (12). MLSB phenotype remains widely predominant since only two strains of group A streptococci, one strain of group C streptococci, and one strain of S. pneumoniae containing an mef gene (data not shown) have been collected, compared to 18 isolates of S. agalactiae that were collected during the same period. Our findings emphasize the need to perform cultures and susceptibility testing whenever streptococcal infections are suspected; antibiograms should include 16-membered macrolides or lincosamides, since these drugs may remain active against erythromycin-resistant streptococci.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Courvalin for useful advice. We are indebted to M. H. Canron and C. André for expert technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. Phone: (33) 5-57-57-10-75. Fax: (33) 5-56-90-90-72. E-mail: corinne.arpin{at}bacterio.u-bordeaux2.fr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Arthur, M.,
C. Molinas,
C. Mabilat, and P. Courvalin.
1990.
Detection of erythromycin resistance by the polymerase chain reaction using primers in conserved regions of erm rRNA methylase genes.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:2024-2026 |
| 2. | Backer, C. J. 1997. Group B streptococcal infections. Clin. Perinatol. 24:59-70[Medline]. |
| 3. | Chatellier, S., C. Ramanantsoa, P. Harriau, K. Rolland, A. Rosenau, and R. Quentin. 1997. Characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae strains by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2573-2579[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Clancy, J., J. Petitpas, F. Dib-Hajj, W. Yuan, M. Cronan, A. V. Kamath, J. Bergeron, and J. A. Retsema. 1996. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a novel macrolide-resistance determinant, mefA, from Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 22:867-879[Medline]. |
| 5. | Clancy, J., F. Dib-Hajj, J. W. Petitpas, and W. Yuan. 1997. Cloning and characterization of a novel macrolide efflux gene, mreA, from Streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2719-2723[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Coonan, K. M., and E. L. Kaplan. 1994. In vitro susceptibility of recent North American Group A streptococcal isolates to eleven oral antibiotics. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 13:630-635[Medline]. |
| 7. | Courvalin, P., F. Goldstein, A. Philippon, and J. Sirot (ed.). 1985. L'antibiogramme. MPC-VIDEOM, Brussels, Belgium. |
| 8. |
Garcia-Bermejo, I.,
J. Cacho,
B. Orden,
J.-I. Alós, and J.-L. Gómez-Garcés.
1998.
Emergence of erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes isolates in Madrid, Spain.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:989-990 |
| 9. |
Johnston, N. J.,
J. C. de Azavedo,
J. D. Kellner, and D. E. Low.
1998.
Prevalence and characterization of the mechanisms of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin in isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2425-2426 |
| 10. |
Kataja, J.,
H. Seppälä,
M. Skurnik,
H. Sarkkinen, and P. Huovinen.
1998.
Different erythromycin resistance mechanisms in group C and group G streptococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1493-1494 |
| 11. |
Paulsen, I. T.,
M. H. Brown, and R. A. Skurray.
1996.
Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems.
Microbiol. Rev.
60:575-608 |
| 12. | Quentin, C. Personal communication. |
| 13. | Ruoff, K. L. 1995. Streptococcus, p. 299-307. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 14. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 15. | Scott, R. J. D., J. Naidoo, N. F. Lightfoot, and R. C. George. 1989. A community outbreak of Group A beta haemolytic streptococci with transferable resistance to erythromycin. Epidemiol. Infect. 102:85-91[Medline]. |
| 16. | Seppälä, H., A. Nissinen, H. Järvinen, S. Huovinen, T. Henriksson, E. Herva, S. E. Holm, M. Jahkola, M.-L. Katila, T. Klaukka, S. Kontiainen, O. Liimatainen, S. Oinonen, L. Passi-Metsomaa, and P. Huovinen. 1992. Resistance to erythromycin in Group A streptococci. N. Engl. J. Med. 326:292-297[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Seppälä, H.,
A. Nissinen,
Q. Yu, and P. Huovinen.
1993.
Three different phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
32:885-891 |
| 18. | Shortridge, V. D., R. K. Flamm, N. Ramer, J. Beyer, and S. K. Tanaka. 1996. Novel mechanism of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 26:73-78[Medline]. |
| 19. | Stingemore, N., G. R. J. Francis, M. Toohey, and D. B. McGechie. 1989. The emergence of erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Fremantle, Western Australia. Med. J. Aust. 150:626-631[Medline]. |
| 20. | Sutcliffe, J., T. Grebe, A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2562-2566[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Sutcliffe, J., A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1817-1824[Abstract]. |
| 22. | Tait-Kamradt, A., J. Clancy, M. Cronan, F. Dib-Hajj, L. Wondrack, W. Yuan, and J. Sutcliffe. 1997. mefE is necessary for the erythromycin-resistant M phenotype in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2251-2255[Abstract]. |
| 23. | Weisblum, B. 1995. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:577-585[Medline]. |
| 24. | Wu, J.-J., K.-Y. Lin, P.-R. Hsueh, J.-W. Liu, H.-I. Pan, and S.-M. Sheu. 1997. High incidence of erythromycin-resistant streptococci in Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:844-846[Abstract]. |
| 25. | Youngs, E. R. 1984. Erythromycin resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Merseyside. J. Infect. 8:86-87[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»