Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 1999, p. 966-968, Vol. 43, No. 4
Departamento de Microbiología,
Received 3 August 1998/Returned for modification 9 September
1998/Accepted 5 January 1999
The in vitro activities of 13 fluoroquinolones (FQs) were tested
against 90 Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: 30 wild type for gyrA, gyrB, grlA and
norA and 60 with mutations in these genes. Clinafloxacin
(CI-960), sparfloxacin, and grepafloxacin were the most active FQs
against wild-type isolates (MICs at which 90% of isolates were
inhibited, 0.06 to 0.1 µg/ml). Mutations in grlA did not
affect the MICs of newer FQs. grlA-gyrA double mutations
led to higher MICs for all the FQs tested. Efflux mechanisms affected
the newer FQs to a much lesser extent than the less recently developed FQs.
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are
inhibitors of DNA topoisomerases, mainly DNA gyrase and
topoisomerase IV (8, 16). In most gram-negative
bacteria, DNA gyrase is the primary target for FQs (4), but
in gram-positive microorganisms, topoisomerase IV seems to have
been the main target for most FQs (1).
Nevertheless, target specificities can alter with various
drugs, and some new molecules, such as sparfloxacin, have been shown to
mainly target gyrase in some gram-positive bacteria (12).
Different mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV subunits have
been shown to confer FQ resistance (2, 18). We studied the
in vitro activities of 13 FQs against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in which the presence or absence of mutations in
DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV has been analyzed.
Ninety S. aureus clinical isolates, collected in the
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (in the mid-west of Spain) and in the Hospital General Universitario de Murcia (in the southeast of
Spain), were included in the study. Isolates were selected on the basis
of the MICs of ciprofloxacin for these strains. Our aim was to select
some clearly susceptible isolates (MICs of around 0.1 to 0.2 µg/ml),
some isolates for which the MICs were around the breakpoint (MICs of
around 1 to 2 µg/ml), and highly resistant isolates (MICs of >4
µg/ml).
gyrA, gyrB, grlA, and norA
and its promoter region were amplified by PCR (1, 6, 7, 15).
The obtained DNA amplification fragments were then studied by the
single-strand conformational polymorphism method (10).
Several DNA fragments of each pattern obtained were sequenced as
previously described (13).
Using previously described methods (17), we studied the
accumulation of ciprofloxacin in four wild-type isolates for which the
MICs were unusually high by using fluorimetric assays, and we then
compared the results to those for other wild-type isolates.
Ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, difloxacin, pefloxacin,
enoxacin, lomefloxacin, fleroxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin, clinafloxacin (CI-960), Bay y-3118, and grepafloxacin were provided by
their respective manufacturers as standard powder.
The in vitro activities of the 13 FQs were evaluated by the agar
dilution method, in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards guidelines (11).
The results from the genetic analysis of the isolates are
summarized in Table 1. No significant
mutations were found in gyrB or norA in any
isolate. There were no isolates with a gyrA mutation alone.
Although isolates were selected only on the basis of MICs of
ciprofloxacin, gyrA single mutations were much less frequent (6.7%) than gyrA-grlA double mutations or the wild type.
Only less recently developed FQs (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or
ofloxacin) were being used in Spain when isolates were obtained
(grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, and trovafloxacin had still not been
marketed in Spain), and the FQs select first grlA mutants
and then gyrA-grlA mutants. An explanation for the low
frequency of grlA mutants, since all gyrA-grlA
mutants are presumed to be grlA mutants first, might be that
grlA mutants are a relatively unstable group and quickly
evolve to become gyrA-grlA mutants when the antibiotic pressure is sufficient.
The MICs of each antibiotic tested in every genotype group appear in
Table 2. According to the
results obtained in this study, isolates with the same genomic profile
for the gyrA, gyrB, and grlA genes
show very homogeneous behavior against the quinolones tested. Bay
y-3118, clinafloxacin, sparfloxacin, and grepafloxacin have similar
MICs for strains with genotypes 1 and 2.
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Activities of 13 Fluoroquinolones against
Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Characterized Mutations
in gyrA, gyrB, grlA, and
norA and against Wild-Type Isolates
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Genotypes and their frequency among 90 S. aureus clinical isolates
TABLE 2.
In vitro activities of 13 FQs against the five genotype
groups found among the S. aureus clinical
isolates tested
Grepafloxacin, sparfloxacin, clinafloxacin, and tosufloxacin have been shown in previous studies to have enhanced activity against gram-positive bacteria compared to less recently developed FQs such as ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, etc., while retaining strong activity against gram-negative bacteria (9). In gram-positive microorganisms, the main molecular target of less recently developed FQs is subunit A of topoisomerase IV (1), although some nonfluorinated quinolones, such as nalidixic acid, can target gyrase in S. aureus (3). Resistance seems to emerge from mutations in the "quinolone resistance determinant region" within grlA. Resistance to high levels of FQs appears when a second mutation occurs, usually in the quinolone resistance determinant region of gyrA (14). So far there is no direct evidence that any FQs primarily target gyrA in S. aureus. Data generated from studies using grepafloxacin suggest that grlA remains the primary target (5). In this case, both grlA single mutations and gyrA single mutations had a limited effect on the activity of the FQ against S. aureus, with double mutations being necessary for resistance (9). Our results show that grlA mutations have little effect on the MICs of newer FQs, as has been similarly shown for gyrA single mutations (14). Therefore, these quinolones are unlikely to be a decisive factor in selecting gyrA and grlA single mutants, the first step in the selection of highly resistant, gyrA-grlA double-mutant isolates. This suggests that development of clinical resistance to grepafloxacin and the other newer FQs would probably require mutations in both gyrA and grlA.
The isolation of such mutants would probably occur at a very low frequency, since the concentrations of quinolone required to kill both gyrA single mutants and grlA single mutants are likely to be much lower than the levels reached in serum and tissues following normal dosages of the drug.
MICs increased significantly when double-mutant isolates were tested. Clinafloxacin and Bay y-3118 were the most active FQs against these isolates.
Four isolates of thirty (13.3%) with genotype 1, one of six (16.6%) with genotype 2, and forty of fifty-four (83.3%) with genotype 3 were methicillin resistant. One isolate with genotype 4 and two isolates with genotype 5 were also methicillin resistant. The MICs of all the FQs tested were similar for methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant isolates in every genotype group. Methicillin resistance was much more frequent in double-mutant isolates than in single-mutant and wild-type isolates. This higher frequency of methicillin resistance is believed to be due to epidemiological factors (e.g., higher frequency of treatment with FQs in these isolates).
Although in most cases there was a clear correlation between genotypes
and MICs (the MICs of all the FQs were the same or very similar for
almost all the strains in a given genotype group), the MICs of all the
FQs for four isolates with no changes found in gyrA,
gyrB, or norA were elevated relative to those for
the other strains with no changes found in these regions. FQs had MICs
for these four strains similar to those obtained for the grlA mutants. The study of these isolates revealed that they
exhibit increased efflux activity, since treatment with carbonyl
cyanide chlorophenylhydrazone increased the cell's accumulation of
ciprofloxacin two to three times. This suggests that regions other than
the promoter can control norA expression or that alternative
efflux systems may exist in S. aureus. This efflux
affected, to a greater or lesser extent, all the FQs studied. The most
affected FQ was ofloxacin. The MICs of most of the less recently
developed FQs for these four isolates were increased over those for the
other isolates 4- to 32-fold. The MICs of the less recently developed FQs for these organisms were increased to around the breakpoint, thus
making it inadvisable to use these quinolones for the treatment of
infections by such isolates. The reaction of these four isolates to the
newer FQs was also abnormal, although the MICs were lower than those of
the less recently developed FQs (Table
3). Increased efflux affected the MICs of
grepafloxacin, sparfloxacin, and clinafloxacin to a lesser extent than
other FQs, confirming the results of previous studies conducted with
these newer FQs (5). In conclusion, these results show that
newer FQs show more activity than the less recently developed FQs
against wild-type isolates and grlA mutants, the activity
against gyrA-grlA mutants being more heterogeneous. Moreover, these newer FQs seem to be less affected by the efflux pumps found in these strains.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by grant FIS 1996-18 from the Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Spain.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente 108, 7007 Salamanca, Spain. Phone: 34923264825. Fax: 34923262261. E-mail: jagarrod{at}gugu.usal.es.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ferrero, L., B. Cameron, B. Manse, D. Lagneaux, J. Crouzet, A. Famechon, and F. Blanche. 1994. Cloning and primary structure of Staphylococcus aureus DNA topoisomerase IV: a primary target of fluoroquinolones. Mol. Microbiol. 13:641-653[Medline]. |
| 2. | Ferrero, L., B. Cameron, and J. Crouzet. 1995. Analysis of gyrA and grlA mutations in stepwise-selected ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1554-1558[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Fournier, B., and D. C. Hooper.
1998.
Mutations in topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase of Staphylococcus aureus: novel pleiotropic effects on quinolone and coumarin activity.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:121-128 |
| 4. | Heisig, P. 1996. Genetic evidence for a role of parC mutations in development of high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:879-885[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Hooper, D. C. 1998. Structure of grepafloxacin relative to activity and safety profile. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4(Suppl. 1):S15-S20. |
| 6. |
Ito, H.,
H. Yoshida,
M. Bogaki-Shonai,
T. Niga,
H. Hattori, and S. Nakamura.
1994.
Quinolone resistance mutations in the DNA gyrase gyrA and gyrB genes of Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:2014-2023 |
| 7. |
Kaatz, G. W.,
S. M. Seo, and C. A. Ruble.
1993.
Efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:1086-1094 |
| 8. |
Khodursky, A. B.,
E. L. Zechiedrich, and N. R. Cozzarelli.
1995.
Topoisomerase IV is a target of quinolones in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11801-11805 |
| 9. | Marriott, M. S. 1998. Grepafloxacin: microbiological properties. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4(Suppl. 1):S9-S14. |
| 10. |
Martínez, J. A.,
G. Ortiz,
M. Segovia,
M. A. Alonso,
M. N. Gutiérrez,
J. L. Muñoz, and J. A. García-Rodríguez.
1998.
Analysis of grlA mutations in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with different levels of quinolone resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1306-1307 |
| 11. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1993. Approved standard M7-A3. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 3rd ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. |
| 12. | Pan, X.-S., and L. M. Fisher. 1997. Targeting of DNA gyrase in Streptococcus pneumoniae by sparfloxacin: selective targeting of gyrase or topoisomerase IV by quinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:471-474[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467 |
| 14. |
Schmitz, F. J.,
B. Hofmann,
B. Hansen,
S. Scheuring,
M. Lackefahr,
M. Klootwijk,
J. Verhoef,
A. Fluit,
H. P. Heinz,
K. Kohrer, and M. E. Jones.
1998.
Relationship between ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin and moxifloxacin (BAY-12-8039) MICs and mutations in grlA, grlB, gyrA and gyrB in 116 unrelated clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
41:481-484 |
| 15. |
Sreedharan, S.,
M. Oram,
B. Jensen,
L. R. Peterson, and L. M. Fisher.
1990.
DNA gyrase gyrA mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus: close similarity with quinolone resistance mutations in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
172:7260-7262 |
| 16. |
Sugino, A.,
C. L. Peebles,
K. N. Kreuzer, and N. R. Cozzarelli.
1977.
Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid: purification of Escherichia coli nalA gene product and its relationship to DNA gyrase and a novel nicking-closing enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:4767-4771 |
| 17. | Takenouchi, T., F. Tabata, Y. Iwata, H. Hanzawa, M. Sugawara, and S. Ohya. 1996. Hydrophilicity of quinolones is not an exclusive factor for decreased activity in efflux-mediated resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1835-1842[Abstract]. |
| 18. | Vila, J., J. Ruiz, P. Goñi, and M. T. Jimenez de Anta. 1996. Detection of mutations in parC in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicob. Agents Chemother. 40:491-493[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |