This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lister, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lister, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, C. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1118-1123, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Pharmacodynamics of Trovafloxacin, Ofloxacin, and Ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model

Philip D. Lister* and Christine C. Sanders

Center for Research in Anti-Infectives and Biotechnology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68178

Received 25 June 1998/Returned for modification 21 October 1998/Accepted 20 February 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate the pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in human serum and to compare their pharmacodynamics against eight Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. The MICs of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ranged from 1 to 2 µg/ml. Trovafloxacin was 8- to 32-fold more potent, with MICs of 0.06 to 0.12 µg/ml. Logarithmic-phase cultures were exposed to peak concentrations of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin achieved in human serum after 200-, 400-, and 750-mg oral doses, respectively. Trovafloxacin was dosed at 0 and 24 h, and ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were dosed at 0, 12, and 24 h. Human elimination pharmacokinetics were simulated, and viable bacterial counts were measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h. Trovafloxacin was rapidly and significantly bactericidal against all eight strains evaluated, with viable bacterial counts decreasing at least 5 logs to undetectable levels. Times to 99.9% killing were only 1 to 3 h. Although the rate of killing with ofloxacin was substantially slower than that with trovafloxacin, ofloxacin was also able to eradicate all eight strains from the model, despite a simulated area under the inhibitory curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) of only 49. In contrast, ciprofloxacin eradicated only five strains (AUC/MIC = 44) from the model. Against the other three strains (AUC/MIC = 22), the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin was substantially diminished. These data corroborate clinical data and suggest that trovafloxacin has a pharmacodynamic advantage over ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against S. pneumoniae in relation to its enhanced antipneumococcal activity.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of pneumonia, bacteremia, otitis media, and sinusitis (24). Since the 1970s, beta -lactam resistance and resistance to multiple antibiotics have been steadily increasing worldwide, limiting the therapeutic options for treatment of some infections (19). It is essential, therefore, that the search for more-effective antipneumococcal drugs continue.

The fluoroquinolones are one class of antibiotics currently being developed for improved therapy of pneumococcal infections. In the past, the role of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in treatment of pneumococcal infections has been controversial because of their marginal in vitro activity. Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited against S. pneumoniae are generally two- to fourfold above the susceptible breakpoints (14, 27, 36). Trovafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone that exhibits enhanced potency against S. pneumoniae. In comparisons with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, trovafloxacin is generally 8- to 16-fold more potent, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited of 0.12 to 0.25 µg/ml (27, 33, 40). The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin with those of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae and to determine if trovafloxacin's enhanced potency would translate to enhanced pharmacodynamic killing when serum pharmacokinetics were simulated. With an in vitro pharmacokinetic model (IVPM), oral doses of 200 mg of trovafloxacin, 400 mg of ofloxacin, and 750 mg of ciprofloxacin were simulated and time-kill pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated over 36 h.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacterial strains and culture conditions. Eight clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae were selected for this study, four of which were resistant to penicillin (MICs of 2 to 4 µg/ml). Logarithmic-phase cultures were prepared by suspending 10 colonies from a 14-h culture on Trypticase soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) into 6 ml of Todd-Hewitt broth (Unipath/Oxoid, Ogdensburg, N.Y.) supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract (THY) (20). Viable bacterial counts after 10 h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 ranged from 1 × 108 to 5 × 108 CFU/ml.

Antibiotic preparations. Trovafloxacin powder was supplied by Pfizer Inc., Groton, Conn. Ofloxacin powder was supplied by R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, N.J. Ciprofloxacin powder was supplied by Bayer Corporation, West Haven, Conn. Trovafloxacin and ofloxacin powders were dissolved in 0.2 ml of 0.1 M NaOH, diluted to final volume with distilled water, and sterilized by passage through a 0.20-µm-pore-size Acrodisc syringe filter membrane (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Mich.). Ciprofloxacin powder was reconstituted with distilled water and filter sterilized as described above.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Susceptibility tests with trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were performed by microbroth dilution methodology according to the procedure recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (25).

IVPM. The IVPM used in these studies was a modification of the original model described by Blaser and colleagues (3) and has been described in detail previously (21). The hollow-fiber cartridges (model BR130; Unisyn Fibertech, San Diego, Calif.) used in these studies consisted of 2,250 cellulose acetate hollow fibers contained within a polycarbonate housing, with each fiber having 30,000-molecular-weight pores within its wall. The surface area of exchange between the hollow fibers and the extracapillary space (peripheral compartment) was 1.5 ft2. Medium containing antibiotic was pumped through the lumen of the fibers at a flow rate of 20 ml/min with Masterflex computerized peristaltic pumps (model 7550-90; Cole-Parmer Instrument Company, Vernon Hills, Ill.) and Easy-Load pump heads (model 7518-00; Cole-Parmer). In addition, the bacterial culture within the peripheral compartment was continuously circulated with similar peristaltic pumps at a rate of 20 ml/min through a loop of silicone tubing attached to two ports entering and exiting the peripheral compartment. The initial volume of culture circulated through the peripheral compartment and loop of silicone tubing was 35 to 40 ml. When samples were required from the peripheral compartment, 0.5-ml volumes were removed through a four-way sterile stopcock (Medex, Hilliard, Ohio) positioned within the loop of silicone tubing. The volume of THY within the central reservoir varied with each drug depending upon the elimination half-life, such that the rate of dilution and elimination could be set at the minimum 0.7 ml/min allowed by the peristaltic pumps. The elimination half-lives simulated were 11 h for trovafloxacin (38, 39), 6.5 h for ofloxacin (16), and 4 h for ciprofloxacin (16). The corresponding central reservoir volumes were 700 ml for studies with trovafloxacin, 450 ml for ofloxacin, and 250 ml for ciprofloxacin. In drug-free control experiments, the volume of THY in the central reservoir was 500 ml and the flow rates for addition of fresh medium and elimination from the central reservoir were 2 ml/min.

Pharmacokinetics in the IVPM. Peak concentrations of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin achieved in human serum after single oral doses of 200 mg of trovafloxacin, 400 mg of ofloxacin, and 750 mg of ciprofloxacin were targeted in these studies (16, 42). To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in uninfected chambers, peak concentrations were dosed into the central reservoir at 0 h for trovafloxacin and 0 and 12 h for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Samples were removed from the peripheral compartment at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 12.5, 16, 20, and 24 h, and drug concentrations were measured by disk diffusion bioassay with a susceptible strain of Escherichia coli. Areas under the concentration-time curves over 24 h (AUC0-24) for trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were calculated by the trapezoidal rule. The AUC/MIC ratios (AUC/MICs) were calculated by dividing the AUC0-24 by the MIC (31).

Pharmacodynamics against S. pneumoniae. Logarithmic-phase cultures were diluted into fresh 37°C THY for a final inoculum of 106 to 107 CFU/ml; introduced into the peripheral compartment of the IVPM; and exposed to trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin as described above. Pharmacodynamic experiments were performed in ambient air at 37°C. At 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h, samples were removed from the peripheral compartment and viable bacterial counts were measured by plating serial 10-fold dilutions of each sample into Todd-Hewitt agar (THA: BBL) and incubating plates overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. The lowest dilution plated was 0.1 ml of undiluted sample from the peripheral compartment. Since 30 colonies per plate is the lower limit of accurate quantitation by pour plate methodology, the lowest number of bacteria that could be accurately counted was 300 CFU/ml. The lowest level of detection was 10 CFU/ml.

To prevent antibiotic carryover, 2.5 mM ferric chloride was added to the THA and mixed by inversion before plating (35). Preliminary experiments demonstrated that 2.5 mM ferric chloride was the optimum concentration which would allow for the growth of all the S. pneumoniae strains in the presence of peak concentrations of each quinolone (data not shown). In studies with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, ferric chloride was added to THA for the undiluted samples only. Because of the enhanced potency of trovafloxacin, ferric chloride was added to the THA used to plate the undiluted sample, as well as the first 10-fold dilution. Ferric chloride was not required for any other dilutions since the fluoroquinolones were diluted to a concentration at least 200-fold below the MIC.

To evaluate for the selection of mutants with decreased susceptibility to quinolones, samples removed from the IVPM at 36 h were also plated into THA containing the antibiotic at a concentration 4× the MIC.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Characterization of test strains and the IVPM. Ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin MICs ranged from 1 to 2 µg/ml for all eight strains. When a difference in MIC was observed, the MICs of ofloxacin were always twofold higher than those of ciprofloxacin. Trovafloxacin was 8- to 32-fold more potent than ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, with MICs of 0.06 to 0.12 µg/ml.

The pharmacokinetic profiles of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin within the peripheral compartment of the IVPM are shown in Fig. 1. Peak concentrations (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) in the peripheral compartment were achieved 0.5 h after dosing into the central reservoir and were 2.9 ± 0.1 µg/ml for trovafloxacin, 6.3 ± 0.3 µg/ml for ofloxacin, and 4.6 ± 0.1 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin. AUC0-24 were 37 µg · h/ml for trovafloxacin, 44 µg · h/ml for ciprofloxacin, and 96 µg · h/ml for ofloxacin. Calculated peak/MIC ratios and AUC/MICs are shown in Table 1.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in the peripheral compartment of the IVPM after dosing into the central reservoir. Drug levels were measured by bioassay. Each datum point represents the mean drug level in the peripheral compartment (in micrograms per milliliter) for three experimental runs. Error bars show SDs.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae

Pharmacodynamic studies. The pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against three representative strains are shown in Fig. 2. Trovafloxacin was rapidly bactericidal against all eight strains of S. pneumoniae, with viable counts falling 5 to 6 logs to undetectable levels (eradication) within 4 to 6 h after the first dose (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Thereafter, no viable bacteria were detected in trovafloxacin-treated cultures through 36 h. The time required for trovafloxacin to achieve a significant 99.9% killing of the S. pneumoniae ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 h (Table 1).




View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Time-kill pharmacodynamics of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against representative strains of S. pneumoniae, 3935 (A), 213 (B), and 256 (C). Each datum point represents the mean CFU per milliliter of THY from the peripheral compartment for duplicate experiments. Error bars show SDs.

The times required to achieve 99.9% killing and eradication with ofloxacin were consistently longer than those observed with trovafloxacin (Table 1). In studies with S. pneumoniae 212, S. pneumoniae 257, S. pneumoniae 213, and S. pneumoniae 3956, it took ofloxacin between 2 and 4 h longer than trovafloxacin to achieve a significant 99.9% killing. In studies with the other S. pneumoniae strains, the differences between ofloxacin and trovafloxacin in times to 99.9% killing were <= 1.5 h. Although ofloxacin eventually eradicated all eight S. pneumoniae strains from the IVPM, viable counts of six strains did not decrease below the 10-CFU/ml limit of detection until 12 to 24 h, or after the second dose of ofloxacin had been added to the IVPM.

Similar to ofloxacin, the rates of killing with ciprofloxacin were consistently slower than those observed with trovafloxacin. In studies with six of the eight strains, ciprofloxacin required 2 to 5 h longer to achieve significant 99.9% killing than did trovafloxacin. In contrast to trovafloxacin and ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin failed to eradicate three of the eight strains from the IVPM and failed to even achieve a significant 99.9% killing of S. pneumoniae 213 (Fig. 2B) and S. pneumoniae 256 (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, in studies with S. pneumoniae 213 and S. pneumoniae 256, the antibacterial activities of the second and third doses of ciprofloxacin were substantially diminished such that net bacteriostasis or slight net increases in viable counts were observed over the second and third dose intervals. No mutants with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin were detected on drug selection plates at 36 h.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

An IVPM was used to simulate maximum oral doses of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin and to compare their pharmacodynamics against eight clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. Although all three quinolones bind to serum proteins (70% protein binding for trovafloxacin compared to 20 to 40% protein binding for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin [23]), these pharmacodynamic studies were performed in the absence of serum proteins. While the degree of protein binding has been shown previously to influence the movement of antibiotics from the bloodstream to extravascular spaces (41), the impact of protein binding on antibacterial activity remains unsettled. The interaction between antibiotics and serum proteins is a dynamic reversible process, and drug molecules are constantly binding and unbinding at a rapid pace (1). In MIC studies, the presence of 40 to 50% serum does not alter the in vitro potency of ciprofloxacin (2, 6) or ofloxacin (4, 18). However, in studies with trovafloxacin, intra- and interspecies variations have been observed, ranging from no effect at all to significant 32-fold reductions in activity (5). Using an IVPM similar to the one in this study, Dudley and colleagues (11a) reported that killing of Staphylococcus aureus with dicloxacillin (~96% protein bound) was significantly altered over the initial 6 h when 25% serum was present in the medium. How these data relate to this study is uncertain, especially since the impact of protein binding is 8- to 20-fold greater for dicloxacillin than for the quinolones evaluated in this study. Furthermore, the impact of protein binding on beta -lactam antibiotics may be much different from that for fluoroquinolones.

Trovafloxacin was rapidly and significantly bactericidal against all eight S. pneumoniae strains and eradicated all strains from the IVPM within 4 to 6 h after the first dose. The significant killing observed with trovafloxacin in this study confirms other pharmacodynamic data in similar pharmacokinetically based models (43, 44). Furthermore the significant bactericidal activity observed with trovafloxacin in this study correlates with the in vivo efficacy of trovafloxacin against S. pneumoniae in clinical trials. Three separate studies have evaluated trovafloxacin for patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia and have reported rates of clinical efficacy from 90 to 100% at the end of treatment and 86 to 92% at the end of the studies (22, 26, 37). When bacteremia was evaluated, trovafloxacin successfully eradicated S. pneumoniae from the blood of 92 to 96% of patients (22, 26). While similar rates of clinical efficacy and bacterial eradication have been observed with ofloxacin (28, 30) and in some cases with ciprofloxacin (17, 29), the more rapid rates of bacterial killing observed with trovafloxacin in this study suggest that the trovafloxacin possesses a pharmacodynamic advantage over ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae. The increased rate of killing observed with trovafloxacin most likely reflects increased peak/MIC ratios obtained with the 200-mg dose, compared to the peak/MIC ratios obtained with maximum oral doses of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. The dose-response relationship associated with the bactericidal activity of fluoroquinolones has been well established previously (11, 34), and in this study, the peak/MIC ratios simulated with trovafloxacin were 4- to 16-fold higher than those simulated for ofloxacin and 5- to 24-fold higher than those simulated for ciprofloxacin. Even if protein binding was not dynamic and the amount of these quinolones bound was no longer available, peak/MIC ratios for trovafloxacin would still be 5- to 10-fold higher than those for ciprofloxacin and 4- to 8-fold higher than those for ofloxacin for the majority of the strains in this study. Although the rates of killing observed for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin may have been more comparable to those of trovafloxacin if their pharmacokinetics in the IVPM had been adjusted to provide similar peak/MIC ratios, the purpose of this investigation was to determine if the enhanced in vitro potency of trovafloxacin would translate into enhanced pharmacodynamic activity.

Although the rates of killing observed with ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were slower than that with trovafloxacin, ofloxacin still eradicated all eight strains from the IVPM. These data corroborate clinical experience with ofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia, in which the eradication of S. pneumoniae from the lower respiratory tract is 97% (30). In contrast, ciprofloxacin failed to eradicate three of the eight strains from the IVPM. In studies with two of these strains, gradual net increases in viable counts were observed over the second and third dose intervals. Since no resistant mutants were detected on drug selection plates at 36 h, the decreased antibacterial activity of the second and third doses of ciprofloxacin most likely represents adaptive resistance or the reversible decrease in susceptibility after first exposure to an antibiotic (8, 9). Similar to the variability in killing observed in the IVPM, clinical experience with ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae has been variable. In some clinical trials, ciprofloxacin has eradicated 95 to 100% of S. pneumoniae bacteria from the lower respiratory tract, including the eradication of strains exhibiting resistance to ciprofloxacin (17, 29, 32). However, in other clinical studies ciprofloxacin has failed to eradicate 30 to 45% of S. pneumoniae bacteria from the respiratory tract (17, 32), and the development of pneumococcal bacteremia or pneumococcal superinfection has been reported during therapy with ciprofloxacin (7, 15).

The eradication of six strains from the IVPM with ofloxacin and five strains with ciprofloxacin was observed despite simulated AUC/MICs of only 44 to 49. These data suggest that the minimum AUC/MIC required for effective treatment of pneumococcal infections with ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin may be well below the 125 breakpoint suggested by studies with ciprofloxacin against gram-negative bacteria (13). This conclusion is supported by data with oral grepafloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (12). Although the number of patients infected with S. pneumoniae was small, Forrest and colleagues reported an 87.5% (seven of eight) bacteriologic cure when AUC/MICs were in the range of 0 to 92 (12). More systematic studies comparing the antipneumococcal pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones over a range of AUC/MICs are required to determine the minimum required for clinical efficacy. This is especially true for those fluoroquinolones which frequently do not provide peak/MIC ratios of 10:1 or greater, since pharmacodynamic data have suggested that the AUC/MIC ratio is most closely linked to treatment outcome when the peak/MIC ratio is less than 10:1 (10).

In summary, the pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin were enhanced over those of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae when maximum oral doses were simulated in an IVPM. The higher rates of killing observed with trovafloxacin were most likely the result of the increased potency of trovafloxacin compared to that of the other quinolones, thus providing higher peak/MIC ratios with maximum oral doses. Data from this study and recent clinical data support the use of a once-daily dose of 200 mg of trovafloxacin for the treatment of pneumococcal infections. Furthermore, the consistent eradication of pneumococci from the IVPM with simulated AUC/MICs of 44 to 49 warrants an in-depth investigation into the minimum AUC/MICs required for efficacy of fluoroquinolones against S. pneumoniae.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from Roerig-Pfizer, New York, N.Y.

We thank Stacey Edward for her excellent technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Research in Anti-Infectives and Biotechnology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178. Phone: (402) 280-1881. Fax: (402) 280-1225. E-mail: pdlister{at}creighton.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Barza, M., H. Vine, and L. Weinstein. 1972. Reversibility of protein binding of penicillins: an in vitro study employing a rapid diafiltration process. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1:427-432[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Blaser, J., M. N. Dudley, D. Gilbert, and S. H. Zinner. 1986. Influence of medium and method on the in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria to ciprofloxacin and enoxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29:927-929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Blaser, J., B. B. Stone, and S. H. Zinner. 1985. Two compartment kinetic model with multiple artificial capillary units. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 15(A):131-137[Free Full Text].
4. Chantot, J. F., and A. Bryskier. 1985. Antibacterial activity of ofloxacin and other 4-quinolone derivatives: in vitro and in vivo comparison. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 16:475-484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Child, J., J. Andrews, F. Boswell, N. Brenwald, and R. Wise. 1995. The in-vitro activity of CP 99,219, a new naphthyridone antimicrobial agent: a comparison with other fluoroquinolone agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:869-876[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Chin, N. X., and H. C. Neu. 1984. Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 25:319-326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Cooper, B., and M. Lawlor. 1989. Pneumococcal bacteremia during ciprofloxacin therapy for pneumococcal pneumonia (brief clinical observation). Am. J. Med. 87:475[Medline].
8. Daikos, G. L., G. G. Jackson, V. T. Lolans, and D. M. Livermore. 1990. Adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics from first-exposure down-regulation. J. Infect. Dis. 162:414-420[Medline].
9. Daikos, G. L., V. T. Lolans, and G. G. Jackson. 1991. First-exposure adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics in vivo with meaning for optimal clinical use. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:117-123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Drusano, G. L., D. E. Johnson, M. Rosen, and H. C. Standiford. 1993. Pharmacodynamics of a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:483-490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Dudley, M. N. 1991. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of antibiotics with special reference to the fluoroquinolones. Am. J. Med. 91(6A):45S-50S[Medline].
11a. Dudley, M. N., J. Blaser, D. Gilbert, and S. H. Zinner. 1990. Significance of "extravascular" protein binding for antimicrobial pharmacodynamics in an in vitro capillary model of infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:98-101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Forrest, A., S. Chodosh, M. A. Amantea, D. A. Collins, and J. J. Schentag. 1997. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral grepafloxacin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40(Suppl. A):45-57[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Forrest, A., D. E. Nix, C. H. Ballow, T. F. Goss, M. C. Birmingham, and J. J. Schentag. 1993. Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1073-1081[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Fu, K. P., S. C. Lafredo, B. Foleno, D. M. Isaacson, J. F. Barrett, A. J. Tobia, and M. E. Rosenthale. 1992. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of levofloxacin (l-ofloxacin), an optically active ofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:860-866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Gordon, J. J., and C. A. Kauffman. 1990. Superinfection with Streptococcus pneumoniae during therapy with ciprofloxacin. Am. J. Med. 89:383-384[Medline].
16. Isreal, D., J. G. Gillum, M. Turik, K. Harvey, J. Ford, H. Dalton, M. Towle, R. Echols, A. H. Heller, and R. Polk. 1993. Pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal titers of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin following multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2193-2199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Khan, F. A. 1990. Ciprofloxacin for respiratory tract infections, p. 87-98. In W. E. Sanders, and C. C. Sanders (ed.), Fluoroquinolones in the treatment of infectious diseases. Physicians and Scientists Publishing Co., Glenview, Ill.
18. Kumada, T., and H. C. Neu. 1985. In vitro activity of ofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compared to other quinolones and other antimicrobial agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 16:563-574[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Lister, P. D. 1995. Multiply-resistant pneumococcus: therapeutic problems in the management of serious infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14:18-25[Medline].
20. Lister, P. D., A. Pong, S. A. Chartrand, and C. C. Sanders. 1997. Rationale behind high-dose amoxicillin therapy for acute otitis media due to penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci: support from in vitro pharmacodynamic studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1926-1932[Abstract].
21. Lister, P. D., W. E. Sanders, Jr., and C. C. Sanders. 1998. Cefepime-aztreonam: a unique double beta -lactam combination for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1610-1619[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Mandell, L., D. Williams-Hopkins, and S. Hopkins. 1997. Efficacy of trovafloxacin in patients with community acquired pneumonia due to penicillin susceptible and resistant S. pneumoniae, abstr. LM-71, p. 377. In Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
23. Medical Economics Data. 1998. Physicians desk reference. Medical Economics Data, Montvale, N.J.
24. Musher, D. M. 1995. Streptococcus pneumoniae, p. 1811-1826. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practices of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y.
25. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1993. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
26. Niederman, M., S. Traub, W. T. Ellison, D. W. Hopkins, and the Trovan Pneumonia Study Group. 1997. A double blind, randomized, multicenter, global study in hospitalized community acquired pneumonia (CAP) comparing trovafloxacin with ceftriaxone + erythromycin, abstr. LM-72, p. 377. In Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
27. Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1995. Activity of CP-99,219 compared with DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 35:230-232[Free Full Text].
28. Plouffe, J. F., M. T. Herbert, T. M. File, Jr., I. Baird, J. N. Parsons, J. B. Kahn, K. T. Rielly-Gauvin, and the Pneumonia Study Group. 1996. Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1175-1179[Abstract].
29. Sanders, W. E., Jr. 1988. Efficacy, safety, and potential economic benefits of oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of infections. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10:528-543[Medline].
30. Sanders, W. E., Jr. 1992. Oral ofloxacin: a critical review of the new drug application. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:539-554[Medline].
31. Schentag, J. J., D. E. Nix, and M. H. Adelman. 1991. Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin. DICP Ann. Pharmacother. 25:1050-1057.
32. Scully, B. E. 1989. Therapy of respiratory tract infections with quinolone antimicrobial agents, p. 143-165. In J. W. Wolfson, and D. C. Hooper (ed.), Quinolone antimicrobial agents. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
33. Sefton, A. M., J. P. Maskell, A. C. Seymour, M. Minassian, and J. D. Williams. 1996. Comparative in-vitro activity of CP-99219, a new quinolone, against respiratory pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:803-808[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Smith, J. T. 1984. Awakening the slumbering potential of the 4-quinolone antibacterials. Pharm. J. 233:299-305.
35. Smith, J. T. 1990. Effects of physiological cation concentration on 4-quinolone absorption and potency, p. 15-21. In G. C. Crumplin (ed.), The 4-quinolones: antibacterial agents in vitro. Springer-Verlag, London, United Kingdom.
36. Spangler, S. K., M. R. Jacobs, G. A. Pankuch, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1993. Susceptibility of 170 penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant pneumococci to six oral cephalosporins, four quinolones, desacetylcefotaxime, Ro 23-9424 and RP 67829. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:273-280[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37. Sullivan, J., J. Gezon, D. Williams Hopkins, and the Trovan Community Pneumonia Study Group. 1997. A double blind, randomized, multicenter study in ambulatory community acquired pneumonia (CAP) comparing trovafloxacin with clarithromycin, abstr. LM-73, p. 378. In Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
38. Teng, R., S. C. Harris, D. E. Nix, J. J. Schentag, G. Foulds, and T. E. Liston. 1995. Pharmacokinetics and safety of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219), a new quinolone antibiotic, following administration of single oral doses to healthy male volunteers. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36:385-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Teng, R., T. E. Liston, and S. C. Harris. 1996. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of trovafloxacin in healthy volunteers. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:955-963[Abstract/Free Full Text].
40. Thomson, K. S., S. A. Chartrand, C. C. Sanders, and S. L. Block. 1997. Trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:478-480[Abstract].
41. Wise, R., A. P. Gillet, and B. Cadge. 1980. Influence of protein binding on the tissue levels of 6 beta -lactams. J. Infect. Dis. 142:77-82[Medline].
42. Wise, R., D. Mortiboy, J. Child, and J. M. Andrews. 1996. Pharmacokinetics and penetration into inflammatory fluid of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:47-49[Abstract].
43. Wright, D. H., L. B. Hovde, M. L. Peterson, A. D. Hoang, and J. C. Rotschafer. 1998. In vitro evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) outcome parameters for three fluoroquinolones (FQ) against Streptococcus pneumoniae, abstr. A-86, p. 53. In Abstracts of the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
44. Zinner, S., D. Gilbert, J. Dickman, and M. Dudley. 1996. Trovafloxacin killing of penicillin-resistant and susceptible pneumococci in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/dynamic model, abstr. A60, p. 12. In Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1118-1123, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Odenholt, I., Cars, O. (2006). Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: simulation of human plasma concentrations after intravenous dosage in an in vitro kinetic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 960-965 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • DeRyke, C. A., Du, X., Nicolau, D. P. (2006). Evaluation of bacterial kill when modelling the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against parC-containing isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 601-609 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Noreddin, A. M., Haynes, V. L., Zhanel, G. G. (2005). Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the New Quinolones. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 18: 432-443 [Abstract]  
  • Ginsburg, A. S., Lee, J., Woolwine, S. C., Grosset, J. H., Hamzeh, F. M., Bishai, W. R. (2005). Modeling In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin Therapy for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection by Using a Novel Cartridge System. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 853-856 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Andes, D., Craig, W. A. (2003). Pharmacodynamics of the New Des-F(6)-Quinolone Garenoxacin in a Murine Thigh Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3935-3941 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, C. (2003). Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Considerations in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 16: 313-323 [Abstract]  
  • Scaglione, F., Mouton, J. W., Mattina, R., Fraschini, F. (2003). Pharmacodynamics of Levofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in a Murine Pneumonia Model: Peak Concentration/MIC versus Area under the Curve/MIC Ratios. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2749-2755 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nicolau, D. P., Mattoes, H. M., Banevicius, M., Xuan, D., Nightingale, C. H. (2003). Pharmacodynamics of a Novel Des-F(6)-Quinolone, BMS-284756, against Streptococcuspneumoniae in the Thigh Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1630-1635 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zelenitsky, S. A., Ariano, R. E., Iacovides, H., Sun, S., Harding, G. K. M. (2003). AUC0-t/MIC is a continuous index of fluoroquinolone exposure and predictive of antibacterial response for Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 905-911 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MacGowan, A. P., Rogers, C. A., Holt, H. A., Bowker, K. E. (2003). Activities of Moxifloxacin against, and Emergence of Resistance in, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1088-1095 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sanchez Navarro, M. D., Sayalero Marinero, M. L., Sanchez Navarro, A. (2002). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of ciprofloxacin 250 mg/12 h versus 500 mg/24 h for urinary infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 67-72 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Andes, D., Craig, W. A. (2002). Pharmacodynamics of the New Fluoroquinolone Gatifloxacin in Murine Thigh and Lung Infection Models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1665-1670 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Odenholt, I., Lowdin, E., Gustafsson, I., Cars, O. (2002). Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin against Streptococcus pyogenes in an In Vitro Kinetic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2046-2048 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Davidson, R., Cavalcanti, R., Brunton, J. L., Bast, D. J., de Azavedo, J. C.S., Kibsey, P., Fleming, C., Low, D. E. (2002). Resistance to Levofloxacin and Failure of Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia. NEJM 346: 747-750 [Full Text]  
  • Lister, P. D. (2002). Pharmacodynamics of Gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model: Impact of Area under the Curve/MIC Ratios on Eradication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 69-74 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peterson, M. L., Hovde, L. B., Wright, D. H., Brown, G. H., Hoang, A. D., Rotschafer, J. C. (2002). Pharmacodynamics of Trovafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 203-210 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MacGowan, A. P., Rogers, C. A., Holt, H. A., Wootton, M., Bowker, K. E. (2001). Pharmacodynamics of Gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model of Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2916-2921 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mattoes, H. M., Banevicius, M., Li, D., Turley, C., Xuan, D., Nightingale, C. H., Nicolau, D. P. (2001). Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2092-2097 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lister, P. D., Sanders, C. C. (2001). Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and sparfloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 811-818 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Klepser, M. E., Ernst, E. J., Petzold, C. R., Rhomberg, P., Doern, G. V. (2001). Comparative Bactericidal Activities of Ciprofloxacin, Clinafloxacin, Grepafloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, and Trovafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a Dynamic In Vitro Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 673-678 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wright, D. H., Brown, G. H., Peterson, M. L., Rotschafer, J. C. (2000). Application of fluoroquinolone pharmacodynamics. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 669-683 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MacGowan, A., Rogers, C., Bowker, K. (2000). The use of in vitro pharmacodynamic models of infection to optimize fluoroquinolone dosing regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 163-170 [Full Text]  
  • Odenholt, I., Cars, T., Lowdin, E. (2000). Pharmacodynamic studies of trovafloxacin and grepafloxacin in vitro against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 35-43 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lister, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lister, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, C. C.