Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1144-1151, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Efficacy of Microencapsulated Rifampin in
Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Infected Mice
Debra C.
Quenelle,1
Jay K.
Staas,2
Gary A.
Winchester,2
Esther L. W.
Barrow,3 and
William
W.
Barrow3,*
Infectious Disease Animal Models
Group,1 Drug Delivery
Group,2 and Mycobacteriology Research
Unit,3 Southern Research Institute,
Birmingham, Alabama
Received 3 September 1998/Returned for modification 25 November
1998/Accepted 5 March 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rifampin is a first-line drug useful in the treatment of
tuberculosis. By using biocompatible polymeric excipients of lactide and glycolide copolymers, two microsphere formulations were developed for targeted and sustained delivery of rifampin, with minimal dosing. A
small-microsphere formulation, with demonstrated ability to inhibit
intracellularly replicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, was tested along with a large-microsphere formulation in an
infected mouse model. Results revealed that by using a single treatment
of the large-microsphere formulation, it was possible to achieve a
significant reduction in M. tuberculosis H37Rv CFUs in the
lungs of mice by 26 days postinfection. A combination of small (given
as two injections on day 0 and day 7) and large (given as one injection
at day 0) rifampin-loaded microsphere formulations resulted in
significant reductions in CFUs in the lungs by 26 days, achieving a
1.23 log10 reduction in CFUs. By comparison, oral treatment
with 5, 10, or 20 mg of rifampin/kg of body weight, administered every
day, resulted in a reduction of 0.42, 1.7, or 1.8 log10
units, respectively. Thus the microsphere formulations, administered in
one or two doses, were able to achieve results in mice similar to those
obtained with a daily drug regimen within the range of the highest
clinically tolerated dosage in humans. These results demonstrate that
microsphere formulations of antimycobacterial drugs such as rifampin
can be used for therapy of tuberculosis with minimal dosing.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tuberculosis has historically been a
significant life-threatening human disease and is still a worldwide
health threat (6), with an increasing incidence of
multiple-drug-resistant (MDR) clinical strains of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (3, 4, 11). First-line drugs for therapy
of tuberculosis are generally effective when used properly. However, it
has been suggested that one of the major reasons for the increased
numbers of MDR strains of M. tuberculosis is inefficient
therapy, sometimes due to lack of compliance (17). In
addition, M. tuberculosis is a facultatively intracellular
parasite, capable of growing within host macrophages (31),
where the access of antimicrobics is limited. Development of effective
therapy for treatment of tuberculosis is important for reducing the
incidence of tuberculosis as well as for treating patients who are
coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. Tuberculocidal therapies
that reduce dosing intervals should facilitate the elimination of
viable bacilli by improving patient compliance. Microencapsulation
technology can be used to accomplish sustained release of antibiotics,
when they are formulated in larger sizes of >50 µm, or to target
drug delivery to specific cells (i.e., macrophages), when antibiotics
are formulated in smaller sizes of <10 µm (1). Effective,
continuous therapies, especially when used in combination, may help to
improve compliance and reduce the emergence of drug-resistant clinical isolates.
Liposomes can also be used to deliver biological agents either
entrapped within the internal aqueous compartments, reconstituted in
the lipid bilayer, or attached to the outer surface. Liposomes are
artificial lipid vesicles composed of concentric lipid bilayers that
alternate with aqueous compartments. They have permeability properties
similar to those of biological membranes. Liposome administration has
been shown to provide delivery of antibiotics in mice infected with
Mycobacterium avium (2, 8, 10, 12, 15, 24, 25,
27) or M. tuberculosis (9, 26, 36) with
some success.
Microspheres, on the other hand, are discrete particles. As with
liposomes, biological agents can either be encapsulated within the
microsphere or attached to the surface. The use of polymers such as
lactide-co-glycolide polymers allows significant flexibility with
respect to the time at which encapsulated material can be released, an
option not available with liposomes. In addition, there are stability
issues of concern when liposomes are administered. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres are degraded by hydrolysis only
and are not susceptible to enzymatic degradation. The advantage of
microspheres would be to extend the time for drug release from days to
months with the small microspheres and for a year or more with large
microspheres. These time intervals are much longer than those for most
liposome preparations. In addition, the amount of drug that can be
administered in large or small preparations of microspheres will exceed
the amounts contained in liposome preparations on a weight basis
comparison (26, 36).
Microsphere formulations, using polymeric excipients of lactide and
glycolide polymers, are known to be biocompatible, as are their
metabolic by-products, lactic acid and glycolic acid (33-35). Their chemical composition is based on the
formulation for synthetic resorbable sutures (16), which
degrade by nonenzymatic reaction (29). Microsphere
technology is an established method for sustained delivery of antigens,
steroids, peptides, proteins, and antibiotics (7, 13, 14, 18, 19,
28, 30). Larger microspheres release contents by diffusion and by
degradation of polymeric excipients (29). Recently, results
in our laboratory have demonstrated the effectiveness of smaller
microspheres for the delivery of rifampin to host macrophages to
significantly reduce levels of intracellularly replicating M. tuberculosis (1). The small microspheres were more
efficient at delivering effective doses of rifampin intracellularly
than equivalent doses of free drug (1). A combination of
small- and large-microsphere formulations would be ideal for use in
tuberculosis treatment regimens because a drug could be targeted to
host macrophages with the small microspheres and delivered systemically
by means of the large microspheres.
Microencapsulation of rifampin, a well-recognized tuberculocidal drug,
was performed so as to yield both large and small microspheres. Large-
and small-microsphere formulations of rifampin were administered only
once and twice, respectively, following initial infection with M. tuberculosis H37Rv. In other experimental groups, oral doses of
rifampin were administered daily by gavage, and the reduction in CFUs
obtained from lung samples at 26 days was used for comparison. Plasma
rifampin levels were quantitated by means of a previously described
bioassay (1).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation of microspheres for extended release of
rifampin.
The process used to prepare large microspheres (i.e., 10 to 150 µm in diameter), designed to release rifampin over time, is very similar to the process used to make the smaller microspheres (i.e., 1 to 10 µm) (1). An excipient solution was prepared by dissolving 4.0 g of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide)
(DL-PLG) in 16.0 g of an organic solvent, in this case, methylene
chloride or ethyl acetate. Approximately 1 g of rifampin was
introduced into the excipient solution, and again a homogeneous
solution was obtained after thorough mixing. The rifampin-DL-PLG
solution was introduced into an aqueous process medium consisting of
5.0% (wt/wt) polyvinyl alcohol. An emulsion was formed by using a
standard laboratory mixer and again was transferred into 5.0 liters of water. The resulting microspheres were collected over standard American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) mesh sieves (Fisher
Scientific). The relatively poor solubility of rifampin was helpful in
encapsulating the drug but proved a hindrance to achieving its timely
release. Thus, we ultimately had to add some low-molecular-weight
polymer to the polymer of choice in order to enhance the hydrolysis of
the polymer and achieve quicker release of the drug.
Rifampin was used in microencapsulation procedures which consisted of
preparing a 25% polymer solution of thermoplastic polyesters of
polylactide and copolymers of lactide and glycolide [or
poly(DL-lactide) and
poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide)] in ethyl acetate or
methylene chloride. Rifampin was introduced into the polymer solution
and mixed. The solution was then introduced into an aqueous continuous phase of polyvinyl alcohol. An emulsion was formed by using a Silverson
emulsifier and was then transferred into water. The ethyl acetate or
methylene chloride was extracted from the emulsion, and the
microspheres were collected by centrifugation and then lyophilization
of the concentrate. Microspheres were sterilized by gamma irradiation
(25 kGy) prior to use in mice. Each lot of microspheres was analyzed
for drug content by spectrophotometric and high-pressure liquid
chromatographic (HPLC) assays, for size by standard procedures using a
Malvern particle size analyzer, and for release characteristics prior
to use in mice. Matching placebo formulations were made for each
drug-loaded preparation. Rifampin (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis,
Mo.) was also prepared as a suspension for daily oral gavage in a
solution of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; tissue culture grade; Sigma)
in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride (for injection; Baxter) solution. A
dosing rate of 0.1 ml per 10 g of body weight was administered
daily to each mouse, with solutions of rifampin yielding doses of 36, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.42 mg/kg of body weight.
Drug content of rifampin microspheres.
The rifampin content
of each lot of microspheres was determined by first extracting the
rifampin from a known quantity of microspheres and quantifying the
amount of drug spectrophotometrically (1). The concentration
of rifampin contained in each sample was determined by measuring the
absorbance on a spectrophotometer at a
of 474 nm. A series of
rifampin solutions of known concentrations in ethyl acetate were
prepared, and absorbances were measured in order to generate a standard
curve. The rifampin concentrations in the microsphere and control
samples were then obtained by linear regression, and the total amount
of rifampin was calculated as (rifampin concentration in micrograms per
milliliter) × (milligrams/1,000 µg) × (sample volume in
milliliters)/(microsphere sample weight in milligrams).
In vitro release analysis of rifampin microspheres.
In vitro
release of rifampin was determined by a procedure previously described
(1). Briefly, multiple samples of each microsphere lot were
weighed into 16-by 100-mm glass test tubes equipped with serum
separators (Fisher Scientific). To each tube, 3.0 ml of receiving fluid
consisting of 0.05 M sodium phosphate solution was added. The test
tubes were placed in an incubator (37°C), and the receiving fluid was
removed and replaced with new fluid at 2, 6, and 24 h and every 24 to 48 h thereafter. The concentration of rifampin was determined
by a standard HPLC assay described in the U.S. Pharmacopeia
(32). An absorption maximum of 254 nm was used for rifampin.
Mycobacterial strains.
M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC
27294; SRI no. 1345) was maintained on Middlebrook 7H10 agar slants,
containing 0.5% glycerol and 10% oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and
catalase (OADC) (Difco). The MIC of rifampin for this strain is 0.06 to
0.25 µg/ml (37).
Bioassay.
A previously described bioassay, using
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), was used to determine
rifampin concentrations in mouse plasma (1). The bioassay
was modified slightly by preparing the standard curve for rifampin in
filter-sterilized control mouse plasma instead of culture medium
(1). Sterile filter paper disks (13 mm in diameter;
Schleicher and Schuell) were aseptically placed into individually coded
wells of 12-well tissue culture plates, and 80 µl of either rifampin
standard solutions or plasma samples was absorbed onto appropriate
disks. A suspension of S. aureus (ATCC 29213) was prepared
and adjusted to match a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard, then swabbed
onto a 150-mm Mueller-Hinton agar plate (BBL) for lawn growth
(1). The previously loaded disks were aseptically applied to
the inoculated plates, which were incubated in a 37°C incubator (no
CO2) for 18 to 20 h (1). At the termination
of incubation, zones for drug standards were measured and a standard
curve was plotted. Zone diameters for test samples were measured, and
values were entered into the computer for regression analysis to
determine the amount of drug in 80 µl of mouse plasma (1).
The value was converted to micrograms of drug per milliliter of plasma.
Mice.
Female CD-1 mice (14 to 16 g) were obtained from
Charles River Laboratories and maintained on a diet of Teklad
sterilizable laboratory feed (Harlan) and water in a biosafety level
III facility throughout the studies. All animal research programs and
facilities at Southern Research Institute are fully accredited by the
Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal
Care, International (AAALAC). Animals were euthanized by
CO2 asphyxiation, consistent with the recommendations of
the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
Approval for these studies was given by the Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee at Southern Research Institute.
In vivo release characteristics of microspheres.
Release
characteristics of rifampin-loaded microspheres were evaluated in mice
prior to use in the infected mouse model. Three groups, consisting of
three mice each, were evaluated. One group received an intraperitoneal
injection of small rifampin-loaded microspheres that have previously
been described by us (1). The small formulations are further
described in Results, under "Characteristics of microsphere
formulations." The intraperitoneal injection was administered as two
50-mg/mouse doses, one given at day 0 and the other at day 7. A second
group of mice received a single 100-mg subcutaneous injection of large
rifampin-loaded microspheres (27% [wt/wt]), described in this report
as formulation 6 (Table 1). The third group of mice received an oral
gavage of rifampin daily (10 mg/kg), from day 0 to day 25. At 7, 14, and 21 days, mice were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine for exsanguination by cardiac puncture, and plasma was assayed for rifampin
by using the bioassay described previously (1).
Infection and treatment of mice.
The mouse model described
here is a nonlethal, short-term model that was developed from previous
studies (5, 21-23) in order to investigate antituberculosis
drugs. The inoculum size and time frame were, therefore, selected to
ensure that death would not occur due to large inoculum size and also
that drugs could be screened with a short turnaround time. Mice were
inoculated via the lateral tail vein on day 0 with approximately
105 viable bacilli of M. tuberculosis H37Rv in a
volume of 0.1 ml of 0.9% sterile sodium chloride solution. Drug
treatments were initiated approximately 2 to 4 h postinoculation.
Each treatment group contained 10 mice. Formulations of small
microspheres, placebo and rifampin loaded, were injected
intraperitoneally on days 0 and 7 in a 50-mg dose suspended in a volume
of 0.25 ml of sterile saline by using a sterile tuberculin syringe with
a 23-gauge needle. Formulations of large microspheres, placebo and
rifampin loaded, were administered subcutaneously in a 100-mg dose
suspended in a 0.5-ml volume of a vehicle consisting of 0.5% (wt/wt)
carboxymethyl cellulose with 0.1% (wt/wt) Tween 80 and 5.0% (wt/wt)
mannitol, on day 0 only, over the dorsal thoracolumbar area by using an 18-gauge needle attached to a sterile tuberculin syringe. Mice were
maintained under general anesthesia with ketamine-xylazine (10 and 1.5 mg/100 g of body weight, respectively, given intramuscularly) during
the subcutaneous injections. Oral gavage of rifampin was performed
daily from day 0 to day 25. Mice were restrained and dosed by gavage
with a stainless steel gavage needle attached to a tuberculin syringe.
All mice were weighed daily and observed for clinical signs of
toxicity. On day 26, mice were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine for
aseptic blood collection using a sterile tuberculin syringe with a
heparinized needle to withdraw volumes of 0.5 to 1.0 ml of blood from
the heart. Mice were immediately euthanized with CO2
following blood collection. Blood was centrifuged briefly, and plasma
was collected and frozen at
70°C until it was used in the bioassay.
Organs were frozen individually in sterile Tekmar bags, thawed, hand
homogenized with a Bayer roller, diluted with sterile saline containing
0.05% Tween 80, and plated onto OADC-supplemented 7H11 Middlebrook
Mycobacterium solid agar. Colonies were enumerated after 14 to 21 days of incubation in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator.
 |
RESULTS |
Characteristics of microsphere formulations.
The small
microsphere formulations have been described previously and were
referred to as formulations 5 and 6 (1). In order to avoid
confusion in this paper, these formulations will be referred to as S5
and S6. Briefly, S5 and S6 were prepared with a mixture of 60:40/50:50
DL-PLG, using methylene chloride as a solvent. Their rifampin contents
were 1.4 and 1.8% (wt/wt), respectively, and their sizes, as 90 volume
percentiles, were 7.5 and 8.8 µm (1). This type of small
formulation has demonstrated effectiveness for delivery and release of
rifampin within macrophages and a proven ability to significantly
reduce intracellular replication of M. tuberculosis H37Rv in
both murine and human monocytic cell lines (1).
With regard to the large microspheres, numerous formulations were
prepared and tested prior to use in treatment of infected
mice. Only
representative formulations are given here (Table
1).
The first level of testing for
microsphere preparations involves
an examination of various parameters,
including observed drug
content (percent by weight), morphology, size,
and in vitro release
characteristics. These characteristics are
improved by adjusting
ratios and components of polymers and modifying
the solvents used
during extraction. These parameters are given in
Table
1 and
Fig.
1. Formulation 1 was not
acceptable because the core loading
(1.38%) was insufficient (Table
1); it was not tested further.
Formulations 2 and 3 had good core
loadings (18 and 19% [wt/wt],
respectively) and sizes (106.1 and
110.7 µm, respectively) (Table
1) but did not show sustained in vitro
release during 15 days
(Fig.
1). Formulations 4 and 5 had good core
loadings (17.6 and
25% [wt/wt], respectively) and sizes (68.4 and
106.1 µm, respectively)
(Table
1), but their release of drug was
premature and too fast
(Fig.
1). Formulations 6 and 7 proved to be the
best because they
not only had good core loadings (27 and 25.7%
[wt/wt], respectively)
and sizes (101.1 and 130.2 µm, respectively)
(Table
1) but also
showed limited initial release followed by an
optimum sustained
release throughout the 15-day in vitro test period
(Fig.
1).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
In vitro release characteristics of large
rifampin-loaded microsphere formulations over a 15-day period in
receiving fluid. Microsphere formulations 2 through 7 are
represented.
|
|
Following the first level of testing, each microsphere formulation is
evaluated for surface morphology and size distribution
in order to
ensure optimum delivery and release parameters. Surface
morphology
reflects the quality of the polymer film of the microspheres.
The more
porous the surface, the more likely the microspheres
will release the
encapsulated drug more rapidly. Size distribution
is important from two
perspectives. Firstly, we know that microspheres
need to be less than
10 µm in diameter to be phagocytized by macrophages.
Additionally, we
know that the smaller the microspheres are, the
more efficiently they
are phagocytized. These points were further
demonstrated in our
previous study (
1). Secondly, the size
of the microspheres
will affect how much drug can be encapsulated
as well as how rapidly
the drug is released. The typical morphology
of the large microspheres
is shown in Fig.
2, which also depicts
a
cross section of a representative large microsphere (Fig.
2C).
The
morphology of the small microspheres has been presented previously
(
1). Size distributions for large microspheres, as
determined
by using a Malvern particle size analyzer, are given for
formulations
6 and 7 in Fig.
3. For small
microspheres, this information has
been given previously
(
1).

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Scanning electron micrograph of large, rifampin-loaded
microsphere formulation 7. Scope magnifications, ×200 (A), ×3,000
(B), and ×900 (C). Panel C depicts a cross section of a single
microsphere. Bars, 100, 1.0, and 10.0 µm in panels A through C,
respectively.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Size distributions of large, rifampin-loaded microsphere
formulations 6 (A) and 7 (B) as determined with a Malvern particle size
analyzer. Data are plotted as volume percentile (percent) versus
particle diameter (in micrometers).
|
|
Effects of microsphere preparations on mice.
Generally, all
microsphere preparations were well tolerated by the mice. Some animals
that received the small placebo microspheres exhibited a slight ruffled
coated appearance on days 1 and 2, but by day 6, they appeared
clinically normal. Mice treated with placebo- or rifampin-loaded large
microspheres tolerated the formulations very well. All mice exhibited
normal behavior, continued to consume feed and water, and did not
exhibit abnormal behavior directed at the injection sites (i.e.,
chewing or biting). Following euthanasia, the postmortem examinations
revealed subcutaneous deposits of microspheres in mice that had
received the large preparations. Rifampin-loaded preparations were
still distinctly orange, while placebo preparations were white.
Similarly, intraperitoneal microspheres were observed in mice that had
received the small formulations. Again, rifampin-loaded microspheres
were still distinctly orange, while placebo preparations were white.
Intraperitoneal microspheres were observed to be adherent to various
abdominal organs, including the spleen, liver, and intestines. The
presence of microspheres did not appear to cause adhesions or other
adverse conditions.
Release characteristics in mice.
Before experiments involving
infected mice were conducted, it was important to verify that
rifampin-loaded microspheres could release sufficient quantities of
drug to rationalize their use in an infected animal model. This was
accomplished by injecting one group of mice with small microspheres on
days 0 and 7 and another group with large-microsphere formulations on
day 0, and subsequently monitoring plasma levels throughout an
experimental period, duplicating our infected animal model of 26 days.
Figure 4 depicts the results of that
experiment.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Release characteristics of small and large
rifampin-loaded microspheres in mice. One group of mice received an
oral gavage of rifampin daily (10 mg/kg) ( ) from day 0 to day 25. Another group of mice was injected intraperitoneally with 50 mg of the
small-microsphere formulation S6 (1.4% [wt/wt] rifampin) ( ), on
day 0 and on day 7. A third group of mice was injected subcutaneously
with 100 mg of the large-microsphere formulation 6 (27% [wt/wt]
rifampin) ( ), on day 0. Additive means for plasma rifampin levels
with small and large microspheres ( ) are also given. At 7, 14, and
21 days, plasma was assayed for rifampin by using the bioassay
described in Materials and Methods.
|
|
At 7 days after injection of rifampin-loaded microspheres, rifampin was
detectable in mice receiving small or large formulations;
the highest
levels were observed in those receiving the small
formulation (Fig.
4).
By 7 days, levels of rifampin released from
small or large formulations
were approximately similar (Fig.
4).
After 21 days postinjection,
rifampin was not detectable in plasma
from mice receiving the small
formulation (Fig.
4). Rifampin levels
in mice receiving the large
formulation were substantially greater
(Fig.
4). During the 21-day
postinjection period, the additive
means for both formulations exceeded
the MIC for
M. tuberculosis H37Rv (MIC of 0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml) (Fig.
4). At 21 days, the large
formulation alone was still
releasing sufficient quantities of
rifampin to exceed the higher MIC
(Fig.
4). By comparison, mice
receiving an oral dose of 10 mg of
rifampin/kg/day had approximately
five- and twofold less rifampin in
plasma than the combined total
for the small and large microspheres at
7, 14, and 21 days postinjection,
respectively. These results
demonstrated that the use of these
formulations would predictably
result in sufficient levels of
rifampin to affect
M. tuberculosis infections in the
mice.
Treatment of M. tuberculosis-infected mice with oral
and microsphere formulations of rifampin.
Mice were infected with
M. tuberculosis H37Rv and treated either with oral doses of
rifampin or with microsphere preparations of rifampin. Oral doses of
rifampin were given daily for as many as 25 days postinfection at
quantities that varied from 0.42 to 36 mg of rifampin/kg/day. For mice
receiving rifampin in the form of large microspheres, only one
treatment was administered, at the time of infection. For mice
receiving rifampin by small-microsphere formulations, two treatments
were given. One was given at the time of infection and one was
administered 7 days postinfection. No other drug therapy was given to
mice receiving microsphere formulations.
With oral administration of rifampin at concentrations of 0.42, 1.25, and 2.5 mg/kg, no significant reductions in viable
M. tuberculosis H37Rv levels were observed at 26 days postinfection
(Table
2). For mice receiving oral
concentrations of 5.0, 10,
20, and 36 mg of rifampin/kg/day,
significant reductions in viable
M. tuberculosis H37Rv
levels were observed at 26 days postinfection
(Table
2). It has been
reported that a concentration of 10 mg/kg
is equivalent to the
clinically tolerated dosage for rifamycin
derivatives in humans
(
20).
Treatment of
M. tuberculosis H37Rv-infected mice with the
small-microsphere formulation alone did not result in a significant
reduction in levels of viable mycobacteria in the lungs by 26
days
postinfection (Table
3). However,
treatment with either
the large formulation or a combination of small
and large formulations
did result in a significant reduction in viable
M. tuberculosis H37Rv levels in the lungs by 26 days
postinfection (Table
3).
In addition, it is important to realize that
of 10 mice treated
with the large formulation, 2 demonstrated no
detectable CFUs
by day 26 at the lowest dilution plated
(10
3) (Table
3). Likewise, of 10 mice treated with the
small and
large combination, 4 demonstrated no detectable CFUs by day
26
at a 10
3 dilution (Table
3). Three other groups,
consisting of 10 infected
mice each, received placebo preparations of
small, large, or small
plus large microspheres. No significant
reduction in CFUs was
observed in these groups after 26 days
postinfection (data not
shown).
When mice were sacrificed, it was observed that aggregates of small
microspheres remained within the peritoneal cavity, suggesting
that
optimum circulation of the microspheres did not occur. This
is most
likely the reason why significant reduction of levels
of mycobacteria
in those animals did not take place. This is a
problem with the
intraperitoneal route of injection; it can most
likely be resolved by
using alternative injection routes (e.g.,
the intravenous route).
Because intravenous injection of microspheres
is not easily performed
in mice, larger animal models are being
considered for those studies.
With regard to the large microspheres,
subcutaneous deposits were also
observed in mice receiving these
formulations. Although degradation of
the large microspheres was
apparent, deposits still remained at the end
of 26 days and still
retained the orange color associated with
rifampin. This observation,
along with the plasma rifampin levels given
in Table
4, suggests
that the large
microspheres were still releasing drug at the end
of the experimental
period.
Posttherapy plasma rifampin levels in microsphere-treated
mice.
Following the M. tuberculosis H37Rv infection
experiment described above, plasma samples were processed from the mice
immediately following the termination of the experiment. Plasma levels
of rifampin were then quantitated by means of the bioassay procedure described in Materials and Methods. Of nine mice that were treated with
the small-microsphere rifampin formulation only, four (44%) had
detectable levels of rifampin in their plasma, ranging from 0.10 to
0.20 µg/ml (Table 4). Six of nine mice (67%) treated with the
large-microsphere rifampin formulation only demonstrated detectable
levels of rifampin in their plasma, ranging from 0.15 to 2.69 µg/ml
(Table 4). In the group of mice that received a combination of small
and large rifampin-loaded microspheres, nine of nine (100%) had
detectable levels of rifampin in their plasma, ranging from 0.15 to
2.69 µg/ml (Table 4).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previously, we reported on the use of microsphere technology as a
means of delivery for rifampin to macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv (1). By using a small-microsphere
formulation (1 to 10 µm in diameter), we were able to show that
delivery of rifampin by this method not only reduces toxicity but is
able to achieve greater reduction of intracellular replication of
M. tuberculosis than an equivalent concentration of rifampin
given as free drug (1). As an extension of that study, we
report here on the development of a large-microsphere formulation that can effectively deliver rifampin systemically for a prolonged period.
This new large formulation was tested along with the previously described small formulation in an M. tuberculosis-infected
mouse model. Results demonstrate that these formulations can be used to
effectively reduce replication of M. tuberculosis in the
lungs of an infected animal.
Reductions in lung CFUs following administration of microencapsulated
rifampin was observed, and statistical significance was achieved in
some evaluations. Improvements in both drug content and release
characteristics of microspheres have been made, allowing for the use of
small and large formulations in combination for effective management of
infected mice. Although rifampin was released from large and small
microspheres, and reductions in numbers of recovered viable bacilli
occurred, the postmortem observations suggested residual quantities of
rifampin within the microspheres after 26 days in vivo. This assumption
was supported by the fact that the bioassay demonstrated substantial
quantities of rifampin in the plasma at the termination of the
experiment. In addition, the aggregates of small microspheres within
the peritoneal cavity indicated that a large percentage of small
microspheres was not taken into circulation. This would suggest that
the small microspheres were unable to be efficiently distributed to
macrophages in lungs or other organs and might explain why optimum
reduction of mycobacterial levels was not observed in the animals
receiving the small formulation only. This assumption was also
supported by the results obtained with the bioassay, which demonstrated
a lack of detectable rifampin in five of nine plasma samples from mice
receiving the small formulation only.
Although intraperitoneal administration of soluble test compounds is
used routinely in mice for efficacy experiments, intravenous administration of microspheres would have been preferable. Attempts to
inject small microspheres via the lateral tail vein were made. However,
the low diluent volumes, reduced total dose of microspheres, small vein
size, small gauge needle size, and tendency for microspheres to
aggregate during injection made this route technically difficult in
mice. Studies with larger animal models are currently being conducted
in order to alleviate these technical delivery problems.
Techniques have been developed for a bioassay for detecting levels of
rifampin in plasma from animals treated with microencapsulated rifampin. These evaluations now allow for demonstration of the in vivo
release characteristics and documentation of therapeutic levels over
time. Use of the bioassay in the development of microsphere studies is
critical in order to plan for experimentation in an infected animal
model. This methodology proved to be helpful in allowing us to predict
that a combination of the small and large microsphere formulations
would effectively control an M. tuberculosis infection. That
prediction proved to be correct. In addition, the bioassay was able to
demonstrate that bioactive rifampin was still being released in
infected animals at the end of the 26-day treatment period. In fact,
the drug levels in mice receiving small- and large-microsphere
formulations (approximately 3.5- to 14-fold greater than the MICs) were
high enough to suggest that reduction of levels of viable mycobacteria
would have continued if the experiment had been prolonged.
These results reveal that by using microsphere technology, it is
possible to effectively treat an M. tuberculosis infection in a mouse model. It was demonstrated that a single injection of a
large-microsphere formulation can significantly reduce CFUs in the
lungs of infected mice up to 26 days postinfection. By using a
combination of small and large formulations, it is possible to achieve
significant reduction in CFUs in the lungs of infected mice at 26 days
postinfection, with 40% of those mice showing no CFUs. This was
accomplished by using only one or two treatments during the 1st week of
infection. The large microspheres were injected once, and the small
were injected only twice. In order to accomplish similar significant
reductions in CFUs with an oral regimen, it was necessary to administer
10 mg/kg daily for 25 days, an amount that has been equated to the
clinically tolerated dosage for rifamycin derivatives in humans
(20). Thus, the microsphere formulations, when given only
twice (i.e., at 0 and 7 days), were able to achieve results similar to
those achieved with the drug given every day for 25 days. These
developments are quite encouraging and indicate that microsphere
technology can be used to deliver sufficient levels of rifampin in the
blood to treat mycobacterial infections.
To put these results into perspective with regard to their potential
usefulness in human therapy, it is important to evaluate the quantities
used in the mouse model. If one assumes that mice weigh approximately
0.03 kg, then the mice that were injected with both small and large
microspheres would have received an equivalent dose of about 947 mg/kg
(28.4 mg of total rifampin given in the 1.4% [wt/wt] small plus 27%
[wt/wt] large microsphere treatment). We know from other studies, as
well as those presented here (Fig. 4), that the small microspheres tend
to release their drug content almost completely by 30 days. However, we
know from other studies that the large microspheres will continue to
release rifampin for at least 50 days (data not shown). Although it is not possible to calculate the total amount of rifampin that had been
released from the large microspheres at the end of 26 days, we can make
a reasonable prediction from other work that about half of the total
amount of drug was still encapsulated. This would mean that a dose
equivalent to about 474 mg/kg had been released during the 26-day
experiment. That amount would be between the amounts given to the
groups that received 10 and 20 mg/kg/day (i.e., 10 to 20 mg/kg/day × 26 days = 260 to 540 mg/kg). This is not an unreasonable
amount, especially considering that dosing was limited to two injection
points (i.e., days 0 and 7) instead of the daily regimen necessary for
oral administration.
Studies are currently being conducted in order to increase core
loadings, improve release kinetics, and optimize delivery of small- and
large-microsphere formulations. These refinements should result in
microsphere formulations that can be used for improved therapy of
tuberculosis by allowing for targeting and sustained release of
antimycobacterial drugs, with minimal dosing. In order to identify an
optimal microsphere formulation, any number of variables can be
manipulated, including the type and molecular weight of polymer, the
quantity of drug encapsulated, and the size and porosity of the
microspheres. By varying these parameters, a formulation can be
designed so that the desired performance criteria, such as the delivery
of a predetermined amount of drug at an acceptable rate, over a
predetermined period of time, are met. Obviously, the physical and
chemical properties of the drug to be delivered will have a substantial
effect on how the formulation parameters are manipulated in order to
achieve the desired performance criteria. We have demonstrated in a
wide range of controlled-release products that once an optimal
formulation for a particular product has been established, the
formulation can be easily reproduced. We have even demonstrated for a
number of formulations that they can be reproducibly scaled up. These
factors are important in considering the use of microsphere technology
in humans.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the NIH, NIAID grant RO-1 AI38185, to
Southern Research Institute.
The technical assistance for the animal model work by Anne Brazier,
Reginald Harris, Beth Taylor, Gloria Triggs, and Frank Vance is greatly
appreciated. We also thank Tom Tice for helpful suggestions and Lloyd
Carlson for the scanning electron micrographs of microsphere preparations.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mycobacteriology
Research Unit, Southern Research Institute, 2000 Ninth Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35205. Phone: (205) 581-2139. Fax: (205) 581-2877. Email: barrow{at}sri.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barrow, E. L. W.,
G. A. Winchester,
J. K. Staas,
D. C. Quenelle, and W. W. Barrow.
1998.
Use of microsphere technology for sustained and targeted delivery of rifampin to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2682-2689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bermudez, L. E. M.,
M. Wu, and L. S. Young.
1987.
Intracellular killing of Mycobacterium avium complex by rifapentine and liposome-encapsulated amikacin.
J. Infect. Dis.
156:510-513[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Centers for Disease Control.
1990.
Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to health-care workers and HIV-infected patients in an urban hospital.
Florida. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
39:718-722.
|
| 4.
|
Centers for Disease Control.
1991.
Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among HIV-infected persons.
Florida and New York. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
40:649-652.
|
| 5.
|
Chadwick, M.,
G. Nicholson, and H. Gaya.
1989.
Brief report: combination chemotherapy with ciprofloxacin for infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mouse models.
Am. J. Med.
87:35S-36S[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Collins, F. M.
1998.
Mycobacterial pathogenesis: a historical perspective.
Front. Biosci.
3:123-132.
|
| 7.
|
Cowsar, D. R.,
T. R. Tice,
R. M. Gilley, and J. P. English.
1985.
Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microcapsules for controlled release of steroids.
Methods Enzymol.
112:101-116[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cynamon, M. H.,
C. E. Swenson,
G. S. Palmer, and R. S. Ginsberg.
1989.
Liposome-encapsulated-amikacin therapy of Mycobacterium avium complex infection in beige mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:1179-1183[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Deol, P.,
G. K. Khuller, and K. Joshi.
1997.
Therapeutic efficacies of isoniazid and rifampin encapsulated in lung-specific stealth liposomes against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection induced in mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1211-1214[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Duzgunes, N.,
V. K. Perumal,
L. Kesavalu,
J. A. Goldstein,
R. J. Debs, and P. R. J. Gangadharam.
1988.
Enhanced effect of liposome-encapsulated amikacin on Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare complex infection in beige mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
32:1404-1411[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Edlin, B. R.,
J. I. Tokars,
M. H. Grieco,
J. T. Crawford,
J. Williams,
E. M. Sordillo,
K. R. Ong,
J. O. Kilburn,
S. W. Dooley,
K. G. Castro,
W. R. Jarvis, and S. D. Holmberg.
1992.
An outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
N. Engl. J. Med.
326:1514-1521[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Ehlers, S.,
W. Bucke,
S. Leitzke,
L. Fortmann,
D. Smith,
H. Hansch,
H. Hahn,
G. Bancroff, and R. Muller.
1996.
Liposomal amikacin for treatment of M. avium infections in clinically relevant experimental settings.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.
284:218-231.
|
| 13.
|
Eldridge, J. H.,
C. J. Hammond,
J. A. Meulbroek,
J. K. Staas,
R. M. Gilley, and T. R. Tice.
1990.
Controlled vaccine release in the gut-associated lymphoid tissues. I. Orally administered biodegradable microspheres target the Peyer's patches.
J. Control. Release
11:205-214.
|
| 14.
|
Eldridge, J. H.,
J. K. Staas,
J. A. Meulbroek,
T. R. Tice, and R. M. Gilley.
1991.
Biodegradable and biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres as an adjuvant for staphylococcal enterotoxin B toxoid which enhances the level of toxin-neutralizing antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
59:2978-2986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gangadharam, P. R.,
D. R. Ashtekar,
D. L. Flasher, and N. Duzgunes.
1995.
Therapy of Mycobacterium avium complex infections in beige mice with streptomycin encapsulated in sterically stabilized liposomes.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:725-730[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Gilding, D. K., and A. M. Reed.
1979.
Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery: polyglycolic/poly(lactic acid) homo- and copolymers.
Polymer
20:1459-1464.
|
| 17.
|
Goble, M.
1994.
Drug resistance, p. 259-284.
In
L. N. Friedman (ed.), Tuberculosis. Current concepts and treatment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 18.
|
Hora, M. S.,
R. K. Rana,
J. H. Nunberg,
T. R. Tice,
R. M. Gilley, and M. E. Hudson.
1990.
Release of human serum albumin from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.
Pharm. Res.
7:1190-1194[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Jacob, E.,
J. A. Setterstrom,
D. E. Bach,
J. R. Heath,
L. M. McNiesh, and I. G. Cierny.
1991.
Evaluation of biodegradable ampicillin anhydrate microcapsules for local treatment of experimental staphylococcal osteomyelitis.
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
267:237-244.
|
| 20.
|
Ji, B.,
C. Truffot-Pernot,
C. Lacroix,
M. C. Raviglione,
R. J. O'Brien,
P. Olliaro,
G. Roscigno, and J. Grosset.
1993.
Effectiveness of rifampin, rifabutin and rifapentine for preventive therapy of tuberculosis in mice.
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
148:1541-1546[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Khor, M.,
D. B. Lowrie,
A. R. M. Coates, and D. A. Mitchison.
1986.
Recombinant interferon-gamma and chemotherapy with isoniazid and rifampicin in experimental murine tuberculosis.
Br. J. Exp. Pathol.
67:587-596[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kradolfer, F., and R. Schnell.
1970.
Incidence of resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in relation to initial bacterial load.
Chemotherapy
15:242-249[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Kradolfer, F., and R. Schnell.
1971.
The combination of rifampicin and other antituberculous agents in chronic murine tuberculosis.
Chemotherapy
16:173-182[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Leitzke, S.,
W. Bucke,
K. Borner,
R. Muller,
H. Hahn, and S. Ehlers.
1998.
Rationale for and efficacy of prolonged-interval treatment using liposome-encapsulated amikacin in experimental Mycobacterium avium infection.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:459-461[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Nightingale, S. D.,
S. L. Saletan,
C. E. Swenson,
A. J. Lawrence,
D. A. Watson,
F. G. Pilkiewicz,
E. G. Silverman, and S. X. Cal.
1993.
Liposome-encapsulated gentamicin treatment of Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare complex bacteremia in AIDS patients.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:1869-1872[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Orozco, L. C.,
F. O. Quintana,
R. M. Beltrán,
I. deMoreno,
M. Wasserman, and G. Rodriguez.
1986.
The use of rifampicin and isoniazid entrapped in liposomes for the treatment of murine tuberculosis.
Tubercle
67:91-97[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Petersen, E. A.,
J. B. Grayson,
E. M. Hersh,
R. T. Dorr,
S. M. Chiang,
M. Oka, and R. T. Proffitt.
1996.
Liposomal amikacin: improved treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex infection in the beige mouse model.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
38:819-828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Redding, T. W.,
A. V. Schally,
T. R. Tice, and W. E. Meyers.
1984.
Long-acting delivery systems for peptides: inhibition of rat prostate tumors by controlled release of [D-Trp6]luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone from injectable microcapsules.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:5845-5848[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Tice, T. R., and D. R. Cowsar.
1984.
Biodegradable controlled-release parenteral systems.
J. Pharm. Technol.
8:26-35.
|
| 30.
|
Tice, T. R.,
C. E. Rowe,
R. M. Gilley,
J. A. Setterstrom, and D. D. Mirth.
1986.
Development of microencapsulated antibiotics for topical administration, p. 169-170.
Controlled Release Society, Inc., Lincolnshire, Ill.
|
| 31.
|
Toosi, Z., and J. J. Ellner.
1998.
Host response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Front. Biosci.
3:133-140.
|
| 32.
|
United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc..
1990.
U.S. Pharmacopeia, XXII ed., p. 1226.
United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., Rockville, Md.
|
| 33.
|
Visscher, G. E.,
R. L. Robison, and G. I. Argentieri.
1987.
Tissue response to biodegradable injectable microcapsules.
J. Biomater. Applications.
2:118-131.
|
| 34.
|
Visscher, G. E.,
R. L. Robison,
H. V. Maulding,
J. W. Fong,
J. E. Pearson, and G. I. Argentieri.
1985.
Biodegradation of and tissue reaction to 50:50 poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microcapsules.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
19:349-365[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Visscher, G. E.,
R. L. Robison,
H. V. Maulding,
J. W. Fong,
J. E. Pearson, and G. I. Argentieri.
1986.
Biodegradation of and tissue reaction to microcapsules.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
20:667-676[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Vladimirsky, M. A., and G. A. Ladigina.
1982.
Antibacterial activity of liposome-entrapped streptomycin in mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Biomedicine
36:375-377.
|
| 37.
|
Wright, E. L.,
D. C. Quenelle,
W. J. Suling, and W. W. Barrow.
1996.
Use of Mono Mac 6 human monocytic cell line and J774 murine macrophage cell line in parallel antimycobacterial drug studies.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2206-2208[Abstract].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1144-1151, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Donald, P. R., Sirgel, F. A., Venter, A., Smit, E., Parkin, D. P., Van de Wal, B. W., Mitchison, D. A.
(2001). The early bactericidal activity of a low-clearance liposomal amikacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother
48: 877-880
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Suarez, S., O'Hara, P., Kazantseva, M., Newcomer, C. E., Hopfer, R., McMurray, D. N., Hickey, A. J.
(2001). Airways delivery of rifampicin microparticles for the treatment of tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother
48: 431-434
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dutt, M., Khuller, G. K.
(2001). Chemotherapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections in mice with a combination of isoniazid and rifampicin entrapped in Poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. J Antimicrob Chemother
47: 829-835
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Quenelle, D. C., Winchester, G. A., Staas, J. K., Barrow, E. L. W., Barrow, W. W.
(2001). Treatment of Tuberculosis Using a Combination of Sustained-Release Rifampin-Loaded Microspheres and Oral Dosing with Isoniazid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 1637-1644
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dutt, M., Khuller, G. K.
(2001). Therapeutic Efficacy of Poly(DL-Lactide-Co-Glycolide)-Encapsulated Antitubercular Drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Induced in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 363-366
[Abstract]
[Full Text]