Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1183-1188, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of an Intramuscular
Monoclonal Antibody (SB 209763) against Respiratory Syncytial Virus
(RSV) in Infants and Young Children at Risk for Severe RSV
Disease
H. Cody
Meissner,1,*
Jessie R.
Groothuis,2
William J.
Rodriguez,3
Robert C.
Welliver,4
Geoff
Hogg,5
Peter H.
Gray,6
Richard
Loh,7
Eric A. F.
Simoes,8
Peter
Sly,7
Ann K.
Miller,9
Alice I.
Nichols,9,
Diane K.
Jorkasky,9
Daniel E.
Everitt,9 and
Kathleen
A.
Thompson9
Department of Pediatrics, New England Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
021111; Ross Products Division,
Columbus, Ohio 432152; Department of
Pediatrics, National Children's Medical Center, Washington, D.C.
200103; Department of Pediatrics,
Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
422224; Royal Children's Hospital,
Parkville, Victoria,5 The Mater
Misercordias Public Hospitals, South Brisbane,
Queensland,6 and Princess Margaret
Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia,7
Australia; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado
School of Medicine and Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado
802188; and SmithKline Beecham,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191049
Received 1 June 1998/Returned for modification 5 September
1998/Accepted 25 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
randomized trial of a humanized monoclonal antibody against a
respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion protein (SB 209763) to
evaluate its safety, pharmacokinetics, and fusion inhibition and
neutralization titers. Forty-three infants who were either delivered
prematurely (
35 weeks' gestation) or exhibited bronchopulmonary dysplasia were administered either single or repeat (two doses, 8 weeks
apart) intramuscular injections of SB 209763 at a concentration of
0.25, 1.25, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg or of a placebo. Four of 229 adverse
events were considered related to the study drug, including purpura
(n = 3) and thrombocytosis (n = 1).
No subject developed a detectable level of anti-SB 209763 antibody.
Approximately 1 week after administration of the second dose of SB
209763 at 10 mg/kg, the mean plasma concentration (n = 9) was 68.5 µg/ml. The terminal half-life
(T1/2) determined by noncompartmental analysis ranged from 22 to 50 days. The population pharmacokinetics for SB
209763 following intramuscular administration was appropriately described by a one-compartment model with first-order input and elimination. Higher values for clearance and volume of distribution at
steady state were observed for younger patients, with values decreasing
to 0.143 (ml/h)/kg and 161 mL/kg, respectively, by a mean age of 298 days (~10 months). The mean T1/2 of SB 209763 for the study population was 32.5 days. No other factor (dose, weight,
gender, race, premature birth, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia) was
observed to alter the population pharmacokinetics of SB 209763 in this
study of infants and young children. The mean neutralization titer on
day 6 was 286, and the mean fusion inhibition titer was 36. At least
57% of subjects dosed at 1.25 to 10.0 mg of SB 209763 per kg of body
weight who were seronegative at baseline experienced a fourfold or
greater increase in fusion inhibition titer. Nine RSV infections were
documented during the 16-week course of the study; the numbers of RSV
infections were similar for the different regimens, including the
placebo. The doses of SB 209763 studied may have been insufficient to
confer protection against RSV lower respiratory tract disease; these
results suggest that additional trials using higher doses of monoclonal
antibody for immunoprophylaxis should be considered.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
remains one of the most important infectious causes of hospitalization
of infants and young children (8). Seasonal outbreaks of RSV
disease result in infection in over 90% of children by 2 years of age.
The outcome varies from a mild upper respiratory tract illness in
approximately 75% of infected infants and children to a severe,
life-threatening disease in a small percentage of infected patients.
Infants at particular risk of severe disease include prematurely born
children, children born with congenital heart disease, and children
with chronic lung disease, particularly bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (10).
Despite the importance of RSV as a pathogen in the pediatric age group,
options for treatment and prevention of RSV disease are limited. Active
immunization to prevent severe RSV disease has not yet proven
successful (7). Two clinical trials with a polyclonal,
hyperimmune RSV globulin have demonstrated safety and efficacy for
prophylaxis in carefully selected children at increased risk for severe
RSV infection (6, 13). The results of these clinical trials
led to Food and Drug Administration licensure of this RSV
antibody-enriched immune globulin in January 1996.
A second-generation product for immunoprophylaxis against RSV disease
is a monoclonal antibody directed against a highly immunogenic RSV
surface glycoprotein (12, 15). Monoclonal antibodies to the
fusion protein have been shown to be effective in preventing RSV
infection in animal models (3, 17-19) and in humans
(9). During the 1995-1996 respiratory virus season, a
multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was
conducted with SB 209763, a humanized murine monoclonal antibody
directed against the RSV fusion glycoprotein. The primary objectives of this phase I trial were to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of
single and repeat intramuscular (i.m.) doses of SB 209763 in a
pediatric population at risk for severe RSV disease. The secondary objectives included measurement of fusion inhibition titers and neutralization titers and assessment of anti-idiotypic anti-SB 209763 antibodies.
(This study was presented in part at the 37th Interscience Conference
on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 28 September to 1 October 1997.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patients.
Infants and young children less than 37 months of
age were eligible for enrollment at one of the seven participating
sites if they were born prematurely (
35 weeks), with a chronological age of
6 months, and/or had a history of BPD. Eligible subjects were
required to have a life expectancy of at least 6 months. The protocol
was approved by the institutional review board at each site, and
informed consent was obtained from all participating families.
Exclusion criteria included known preexisting heart, liver, or renal
disease; a recognized immune system abnormality; severe respiratory
illness requiring assisted ventilation; or previous gamma globulin infusion.
Randomization.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of
four monoclonal antibody dosage groups (0.25, 1.25, 5.0, or 10.0 mg of
SB 209763 per kg of body weight) or to a placebo group according to a
randomization schedule provided by SmithKline Beecham. Each dosage
group included at least eight subjects; within each dosage group, at
least six infants received SB 209763 at the first administration while
at least two subjects received the placebo (Table
1). Eight weeks after administration of
the first dose, a second i.m. injection was given. Subjects who were
randomized to received the monoclonal antibody initially received a
repeat dose identical to the initial dose. Subjects who initially
received the placebo were crossed over and received SB 209763 at a
dosage consistent with that for the group to which they were initially
assigned.
The 8-week dosing interval was identical to the dosing interval
examined in an earlier study of adults (unpublished data). Results from
this study and an additional trial involving adults demonstrated that
plasma levels of SB 209763 remain above 10 µg/ml 8 weeks after i.m.
administration for at least some of the dosages used in the present
study (4). This concentration has been associated with
protection in murine and rat models of RSV infection in vivo
(19).
Study drug.
SB 209763 lyophilate (lot no. U-94045),
reconstituted with sterile water to a concentration of 45 mg/ml, and a
placebo (a solution containing all components of the active preparation
except SB 209763) were used in this study. Doses of 0.25 and 1.25 mg of
SB 209763/kg were administered as single i.m. injections into one thigh
muscle. Doses of 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg were divided and administered as
separate injections into each thigh muscle to maintain reasonable
injection volumes. Placebo subjects were injected with a volume of
placebo equivalent to the volume of active drug that would have been
received by a subject of identical weight assigned to that dosage
group. At the highest dose, a volume of 0.22 ml of either active drug
or placebo per kg was administered.
Higher doses of SB 209763 were not administered within a randomization
regimen until at least three subjects within the regimen's dosage
group had received a lower dose and were evaluated through 24 h
postdosing (thus ensuring that at least two of the three dosed
individuals received the active drug). This evaluation included an
assessment of the results of laboratory studies for patient safety,
conducted 24 h after injection of the study medication. The
following laboratory tests were performed: complete blood count;
differential blood count; platelet count; determination of alanine
aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline
phosphatase, and creatinine levels in serum; and urinalysis. Dose
escalation was halted and reevaluated in a consultation with the study
sponsor upon occurrence of a serious adverse response.
Safety parameters.
Screening visits included a medical
history and physical examination. A physical examination was performed
and blood and urine samples were collected for laboratory tests for
determination of patient safety prior to administration of each dose of
the study medication. Blood and urine samples were also obtained for laboratory testing at 24 h and 2 weeks after administration of the
first dose and at 2 weeks after administration of the second dose of
the study medication. A physical examination was also performed at the
2-week-postdose visit. Injection sites were examined for local
reactions at approximately 5 min, 2 h, and between 4 and 7 days
after each injection. Vital signs were measured prior to and at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min following administration of each dose of the study drug.
Blood samples were obtained prior to and approximately 6 days and 2 and
8 weeks following administration of each dose for assessment of the
presence of anti-SB 209763 antibodies. Plasma was analyzed for anti-SB
209763 antibodies by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serial
dilutions of plasma samples were added to microtiter plates coated with
SB 209763. Anti-SB 209763 antibodies present in plasma were allowed to
bind; the sandwiched anti-SB 209763 was detected by binding of
biotin-labeled SB 209763 followed by the use of an avidin-biotinylated
alkaline phosphatase system. The positive controls, a bovine monoclonal
anti-idiotypic antibody and a rabbit polyclonal anti-SB 209763 antibody, were included in each assay.
Subjects were monitored during the RSV season for the presence of RSV
disease symptoms through biweekly telephone contacts. If a subject
developed respiratory symptoms, attempts were made to obtain a
nasopharyngeal aspirate, which was tested for the presence of RSV by
antigen detection assay. Samples testing positive were transported to a
central processing laboratory for RSV culture and titer determination.
Pairs of tubes of Hep2 cells (in 1.5 ml of basal medium [Eagle minimal
medium supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum, 2%
L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-Fungizone]) were each inoculated with 0.2 ml of 100 to
10
6 dilutions of the nasopharyngeal aspirate specimen.
The inoculated cells were then incubated at 34°C for 3 weeks and
observed three times per week for development of cytopathic effects.
The maintenance medium was changed two times per week. Observed virus
titers were expressed as 50% tissue culture infective doses per milliliter.
Pharmacokinetic parameters.
For analysis of plasma SB 209763 concentrations, venous blood samples were collected in sodium citrate
tubes prior to administration of the first dose and at approximately
24 h, 6 days, and 2 and 8 weeks after the first dose of study
medication was administered. The 8-week sample was drawn just prior to
administration of the second dose. Blood samples were also drawn at
approximately 6 days and 2 and 8 weeks after administration of the
second dose of the study medication.
Plasma SB 209763 concentrations were quantified by an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay based on the simultaneous binding of SB 209763 to
two bovine anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibodies, B11 and B12
(3). Briefly, SB 209763 was captured from plasma in a
microtiter plate to which B11 had been bound. The B11-SB 209763 complex
was then probed with biotinylated B12, forming a sandwich which was
detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin. The lower
limit of detection of SB 209763 in 10% (vol/vol) phosphate saline
buffer was 0.030 µg/ml. A low predose response was noted in one
patient in the 1.25-mg/kg group. However, this value had no effect on
the data analysis, since all postdosing SB 209763 concentrations in
this patient were at least 30-fold higher than the predose level.
Typical within- and between-run precision values (coefficients of
variation) for this assay were 2.8 to 8.4% and 0.8 to 12.9%,
respectively. Typical average accuracy values were 94 to 105%.
Concentration-time data for each subject in each dose group were
analyzed by noncompartmental methods. The area under the plasma
concentration-time curve from immediately predose (time zero) to the
last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), the
peak concentration of SB 209763 (Cmax), and the
apparent terminal elimination phase half-life
(T1/2) were determined for both the first and
second doses of SB 209763. The AUC for the first dose was calculated by
using samples obtained prior to administration of the second dose. The
AUC following administration of the second dose (the sum of the AUC for
the second dose plus that remaining from the first dose) was calculated
by using blood samples obtained immediately before administration of
the second dose as well as samples obtained at 6 days and at 2 and 8 weeks after administration of the second dose. The apparent terminal
elimination phase rate constant,
z, was
derived from the log-linear disposition phase of the concentration-time
curve by least-squares regression analysis with visual inspection of
the data to determine the appropriate number of data points for the
calculation of
z. At least three points in
the terminal elimination phase were required for calculation of
z. The AUC0-t was
calculated by using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental
trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid.
The T1/2 was calculated as ln
2/
z.
The plasma concentration-time data were further analyzed by using
nonlinear mixed-effect modeling as implemented in the NONMEM computer
program (1, 2). Based on a visual examination of these data
and data from a previous study of healthy adults, a one-compartment
model with first-order input and elimination was used to describe the
data. This model was parameterized in terms of the apparent clearance
(CL/F), the volume of distribution at steady state
(VSS/F), and the absorption rate
(ka) following i.m. administration. The effects
of patient demographics and other factors (dose, age, weight, gender,
race, premature birth, and BPD on the pharmacokinetic parameters
CL/F and Vss/F were
assessed to determine whether these factors should be retained in the
final model. To examine the potential effect of these factors on the pharmacokinetics of SB 209763, the value of ka
was fixed at 0.0469 liters/h.
The primary consideration in selecting which model to use in analyzing
the data (including selection of the factors to be included in the
model) involved a statistically significant change in the objective
function as implemented by Beal and Sheiner (2). For
hierarchical models, a difference of 8 in the objective function was
assumed to be significant at the 95% level when there was a change of
1 degree of freedom. Nonhierarchical models were assessed by direct
comparison of the log likelihood values. The following were also
crucial to the selection of a model: (i) assessment of the weighted
residual plots showing any variability as featureless random noise;
(ii) increased precision in parameter estimates, resulting in smaller
values for standard error; and (iii) reduction in estimates of
interindividual variances.
Pharmacodynamic parameters.
Venous blood samples for
analysis of fusion inhibition and plasma neutralization antibody titers
were obtained prior to administration of each dose and at approximately
6 days and 2 and 8 weeks after administration of SB 209763 or the
placebo. In vitro microneutralization assays were used to measure the
ability of SB 209763 to inhibit the growth of RSV (4).
Fusion inhibition and plasma neutralization titers were expressed as
the reciprocal of the dilution which caused a 50% reduction in the
optical density at 450 nm based on regression analysis of the dose titration.
 |
RESULTS |
Enrollment.
Forty-three infants and children were enrolled in
this study (11 premature infants without BPD and 32 infants with BPD).
The subjects ranged in age from 8 days to 33 months and weighted
between 1.1 and 15.5 kg (mean, 5.3 kg) at the time of enrollment. The racial demographics were as follows: 74% white, 12% black, 12% Oriental, and 2% other. Forty-two subjects completed the study. One
subject was withdrawn due to noncompliance with the follow-up protocol
after receiving one 10-mg/kg dose of SB 209763. This subject was
included in the analysis as if the 10-mg/kg treatment regimen had been
completed. The number of subjects who received each treatment regimen
is shown in Table 1. The patient demographics as a function of dosage
group are shown in Table 2. Although it
is difficult to assess homogeneity across dosage groups given the
relatively small sample size, it appears that the groups were fairly
well balanced in terms of mean age and weight. The racial compositions
of the groups were also relatively balanced; participants in all four
dosage groups were predominantly white. The gender distributions of the
three lowest-dosage groups were similar, with more females being
enrolled than males; the highest-dosage group was skewed in the
opposite direction. The majority of subjects in each group had chronic
lung disease (BPD).
Safety results.
Single and repeat doses of 0.25 to 10.0 mg of
SB 209763 per kg were safe and well tolerated. There were no deaths
during the study. There were 229 adverse events reported for 41 subjects over the 16 weeks following treatment with the study
medication. Thirty-seven adverse events occurred in 10 subjects who
received the placebo, and 192 were reported in 35 subjects who received SB 209763. Most were mild to moderate in severity. Four adverse events
were considered by the investigators to be related to the study drug.
These included three episodes of mild to moderate purpura, which
occurred in two subjects, and thrombocytosis, which occurred in one
subject. The purpura developed at the site of blood sampling. All
adverse events had resolved by the end of the study surveillance
period. Nineteen laboratory test values were considered clinically
relevant by the investigator. Two of these, granulocytopenia and
thrombocytosis, were considered to be related to the study medication.
The administration of the study drug was not altered in any patient due
to side effects.
Erythema or induration at the injection site was observed at 30% of
placebo injection sites and at 48% of SB 209763 injection sites at 5 min postadministration. Most reactions consisted of erythema without
induration. No adverse reactions were evident in placebo recipients
after 5 min. Eight percent of SB 209763 injection sites continued to
show a response at 2 h postadministration. No reactions were
evident at the final scheduled assessment (between 4 and 7 days
postadministration). These reactions were not reported to be associated
with obvious pain or discomfort and were not considered by the
investigators to be clinically relevant.
None of the subjects' plasma samples tested positive for anti-SB
209763 antibodies.
RSV infection.
Sixty-five episodes of respiratory illness
occurred. During 40 of these episodes, nasopharyngeal specimens were
obtained, and RSV was recovered from nine specimens, as shown in Table
3. Although there were fewer RSV
infections in the group receiving SB 209763 at 10 mg/kg (1 of 22) than
in the placebo group (2 of 10), the difference was not statistically
significant (P = 0.20).
Pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Following noncompartmental
analysis of the SB 209763 concentration data,
Cmax values and total exposure (as indicated by
the AUC) of SB 209763 following i.m. administration increased with increasing dosages of SB 209763 (Table
4). All subjects had quantifiable concentrations of SB 209763 at the last sampling times for the first
and second doses of SB 209763. The T1/2 was
calculated only if at least three time-concentration values were
present in the terminal phase. This resulted in the
T1/2 being estimated for 21 of 75 concentration-time profiles derived from 43 subjects, ranging from 22 to 50 days. Concentrations of SB 209763 were available on days 1 and 6 after the first dose of SB 209763 was administered in 19 of the 43 subjects. All 19 of the subjects had higher concentrations on day 6 than on day 1. Mean concentrations in specimens obtained on day 56 (± 7 days), as shown in Table 4, ranged from 0.50 to 21.1 µg/ml for
dosages of 0.25 to 10 mg/kg. Mean plasma SB 209763 concentrations
following single and repeat i.m. doses are shown in Fig.
1.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mean SB 209763 concentrations, ± standard deviations,
versus time for subjects receiving doses of 0.25 mg/kg ( ), 1.25 mg/kg ( ), 5 mg/kg ( ), or 10 mg/kg ( ).
|
|
Based on NONMEM analysis, the SB 209763 plasma concentration-time data
in this patient population were adequately described by a
one-compartment model with first-order input. A covariate evaluation
showed that the CL/F and
VSS/F values were higher for younger
patients, with values decreasing with increasing age to 0.143 (ml/h)/kg
and 161 ml/kg, respectively, by a mean age of 298 days (~10 months).
The corresponding T1/2 for a mean age of 298 days was 32.5 days. The relationship between age and CL/F was described as follows: CL/F = 0.143 · (age/298)
0.316. For
VSS/F, the model which included age
was described as follows: VSS/F = 161 · (age/298)
0.306. The exponential
equations permitted predictions for CL/F and VSS/F to increase for newborns
through the age of 298 days and to level off as the age increased
beyond 298 days. Between-subject variabilities described by
coefficients of variation for CL/F and
VSS/F were estimated to be 34 and
33%, respectively. No other factor (dose, weight, gender, race,
premature birth, or BPD) was observed to alter the population
pharmacokinetics of SB 209763 in this study of infants and young
children. Dose linearity is supported by the fact that changes in
CL/F and VSS/F were not related to dose amounts.
Pharmacodynamic evaluation.
The mean and median neutralization
and fusion inhibition antibody titers on day 6 are shown, in comparison
to the corresponding predose titers, in Table
5. Increases in most of the titers were observed for recipients of each of the four dosing regimens. In the 10 placebo recipients, median titers did not significantly change between
predose and 6-day-postdose specimens. Among infants who received a dose
of 10 mg/kg, there was typically a two- to fourfold increase over
predose titers. The wide range of predose neutralization and fusion
inhibition antibody titers among infants in different dosing groups
explains at least some of the variation in peak titers after dosing.
To further evaluate the change in the levels of both neutralizing
antibodies and fusion inhibition antibodies, the same data were
analyzed as ratios of the concentrations on day 6 to the predose titers
(Table 6). This analysis also shows the
difference between predose and day 6 concentrations in those subjects
who were seronegative prior to the first dose. Although the number of
SB 209763 recipients who were seronegative before administration of the
first dose was small in each category, the majority of seronegative
subjects who received SB 209763 at a dose of 1.25 mg/kg or higher
demonstrated more than a fourfold increase in neutralizing and fusion
inhibition antibody titers on day 6.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the absence of a safe and effective vaccine, passive
immunoprophylaxis holds the greatest promise for the prevention of severe RSV illness in high-risk children. Studies have shown that immunoprophylaxis with a polyclonal, hyperimmune RSV globulin is
effective in attenuating RSV disease both in animal models and in
high-risk infants and children. However, there are several disadvantages to this product, including the need for intravenous administration, the fluid volume associated with its administration, the less-than-complete protection against RSV disease achieved, and the
issue of safety in children with cyanotic heart disease (11). An effective monoclonal antibody can be administered
i.m., thereby avoiding many of these difficulties.
Monoclonal antibodies of purely murine origin have not been widely used
in clinical trials due to concerns with regard to the development of
anti-murine antibodies. Substitution of human sequences for the murine
sequences within the non-antigen-binding region of the molecule results
in a lower degree of immunogenicity relative to that of unmodified
murine monoclonal antibodies. In the present trial, single and repeat
doses of 0.25 to 10.0 mg of SB 209763, a humanized murine monoclonal
antibody against the RSV fusion protein, per kg were safe and well
tolerated when administered i.m. to high-risk infants. Evaluation of
the local and systemic anti-SB 209763 immune response failed to reveal
evidence of an immune reaction against this humanized antibody. These
results are similar to those of previous studies of healthy male
subjects who received single and multiple doses of SB 209763 and did
not develop a detectable anti-idiotypic reaction (4).
Another humanized RSV monoclonal antibody, directed against the F
protein, showed a similar lack of immunogenicity (16).
Although the number of sampling times in this study was limited
(n = 7) in comparison to many studies examining
pharmacokinetics, sufficient information was available to provide
individual values of Cmax and
AUC0-t by utilizing noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. However, parameter estimates for
AUC0-t and Cmax should
be considered as approximations of the values that would be obtained
with a more intensive sampling schedule. By the use of population
modeling, estimates of CL/F and
VSS/F were obtainable. The predicted
CL/F of 0.143 (ml/h)/kg for the mean age of 298 days is
similar to values of intravenous clearance (CL) reported for healthy
adults who were administered intravenous doses of SB 209763 (15). In this earlier study, mean CL values ranged from
0.122 to 0.142 (ml/h)/kg for similar doses of 0.25 to 10.0 mg/kg.
Mean estimates for VSS/F from
the earlier, intravenous study of healthy adults ranged from 87.5 to
104 ml/kg for doses of 0.25 to 10.0 mg/kg. This is in contrast to a
mean Vss/F of 161 ml/kg for the
present study population. These differences could be in part due to the
larger proportion of total and extracellular body water in infants and
young children (5).
Analysis of plasma neutralization and fusion inhibition antibody levels
following administration of a single dose of the study medication
suggests that doses of as little as 1.25 mg of SB 209763 per kg may be
associated with some increase in antiviral activity. However, given the
relatively low neutralization and fusion inhibition antibody titers
that were achieved with the highest dosing regimen, it is not
surprising that differences in RSV attack rates were not observed.
Also, the high predose neutralization-antibody titer in placebo
recipients may have conferred some degree of protection, making it
difficult to detect a difference in RSV infection rates between groups.
Experience with a polyclonal, hyperimmune RSV globulin indicates that
serum neutralizing-antibody titers of greater than 1:200 are necessary
to limit RSV replication in the lower respiratory tract. Because of the
presence of functionally distinct populations among the
RSV-neutralizing antibodies in a polyclonal antibody preparation, only
a subset of neutralizing antibodies may actually be protective
(14). In this trial, the absence of a cumulative effect on
antibody concentration that would be derived from serial doses of SB
209763 also may have contributed to the lack of an effect on RSV
infection rates. However, the lack of toxicity and the relative ease of
i.m. administration justify further consideration of RSV prophylaxis
with a monoclonal antibody.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Danuta Herzyk for assessment of the anti-SB 209763 response and Sandra Griego for assistance with analysis of data relating to titers.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: New England
Medical Center, Box 321, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111. Phone:
(617) 636-5227. Fax: (617) 636-4300. E-mail:
cmeissner{at}es.nemc.org.
Present address: Hawthorne Research and Consulting, King of
Prussia, PA 19406.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Beal, S. L., and L. B. Sheiner.
1980.
The NONMEM system.
Am. Stat.
34:118.
|
| 2.
|
Beal, S. L., and L. B. Sheiner.
1978.
and 1985.
In
NONMEM users guide, parts I to VI. University of California, San Francisco.
|
| 3.
|
Davis, C. B.,
T. W. Hepburn,
J. J. Urbanski,
D. C. Kwok,
T. K. Hart,
D. J. Herzyk,
S. G. Demuth,
M. Leland, and G. R. Rhodes.
1995.
Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation of the respiratory syncytial virus-specific reshaped human monoclonal antibody RSHZ19.
Drug Metab. Dispos.
23:1028-1036[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Everitt, D. E.,
C. B. Davis,
K. Thompson,
R. DiCicco,
B. Ilson,
S. G. Demuth,
D. J. Herzyk, and D. K. Jorkasky.
1996.
The pharmacokinetics, antigenicity, and fusion-inhibition activity of RSHZ19, a humanized monoclonal antibody to respiratory syncytial virus, in healthy volunteers.
J. Infect. Dis.
174:463-469[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Green, T. P., and B. L. Mirkin.
1984.
Clinical pharmacokinetics: pediatric considerations, p. 269-282.
In
L. Z. Bennet, N. Massoud, and J. G. Gambertoglio (ed.), Pharmacokinetic basis for drug treatment. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Groothuis, J. R.,
E. A. F. Simoes,
J. J. Levin, et al.
1993.
Prophylactic administration of respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin to high-risk infants and children.
N. Engl. J. Med.
329:1524-1530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Hall, C. B.
1994.
Prospects for a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine.
Science
265:1393-1394[Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Heilman, C. A.
1990.
Respiratory syncytial and parainfluenza viruses.
J. Infect. Dis.
161:402-406[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
IMPACT-RSV Study Group.
1998.
Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from RSV infection in high-risk infants.
Pediatrics
102:531-537[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Meissner, H. C.,
R. C. Welliver,
S. A. Chartrand,
D. R. Fulton,
W. J. A. Rodriguez, and J. R. Groothuis.
1996.
Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in high risk infants: consensus opinion on the role of immunoprophylaxis with respiratory syncytial virus hyperimmune globulin.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
15:1059-1068[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Meissner, H. C., and J. R. Groothuis.
1997.
Immunoprophylaxis and control of RSV disease.
Pediatrics
100:260-263[Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Olmsted, R. A.,
N. Elango,
G. A. Prince,
B. R. Murphy,
P. R. Johnson,
B. Moss, and P. Collins.
1986.
Expression of the F glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus: comparison of the individual contributions of the F and G glycoproteins to host immunity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:7462-7466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
PREVENT Study Group.
1997.
Reduction of RSV hospitalization among premature infants and infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia using respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin prophylaxis.
Pediatrics
99:93-99[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Siber, G. R.,
J. Leszczynski,
V. Pena-Cruz,
C. Ferren-Gardner,
R. Anderson,
V. G. Hemming,
E. E. Walsh,
J. Burns,
K. McIntosh,
R. Gonin, and L. J. Anderson.
1992.
Protective activity of a human respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin prepared from donors screened by microneutralization assay.
J. Infect. Dis.
165:456-463[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Stott, E. J.,
G. Taylor,
L. A. Ball,
K. Anderson,
K.K.-Y. Young,
A. M. Q. King, and G. W. Wertz.
1987.
Immune and histopathological responses in animals vaccinated with recombinant vaccinia viruses that express individual genes of human respiratory syncytial virus.
J. Virol.
61:3855-3861[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Subramanian, K. N. S.,
L. E. Weisman,
T. Rhodes,
R. Ariagno,
P. J. Sanchez,
J. Steichen,
L. B. Givner,
T. L. Jennings,
F. H. Top, Jr.,
D. Carlin, and E. Connor.
1998.
Safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetics of a humanized monoclonal antibody to respiratory syncytial virus in premature infants and infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
17:110-115[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Taylor, G.,
E. J. Stott,
M. Hughes, and A. P. Collins.
1984.
Respiratory syncytial virus in mice.
Infect. Immun.
43:649-655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Walsh, E. E.,
J. J. Schlesinger, and M. W. Brandriss.
1984.
Protection from respiratory syncytial virus infection in cotton rats by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
43:756-758[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Wyde, P. R.,
D. K. Moore,
T. Hepburn,
C. L. Silverman,
T. G. Porter,
M. Gross,
G. Taylor,
S. G. Demuth, and S. B. Dillon.
1995.
Evaluation of the protective efficacy of reshaped human monoclonal antibody RSHZ19 against respiratory syncytial virus in cotton rats.
Pediatr. Res.
38:543-549[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1183-1188, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.