Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 1999, p. 1556-1559, Vol. 43, No. 7
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacokinetics of Dirithromycin in Patients with
Mild or Moderate Cirrhosis
Teresita
Mazzei,1,*
Calogero
Surrenti,2
Andrea
Novelli,1
Maria Rosa
Biagini,2
Stefania
Fallani,1
Maria Iris
Cassetta,1
Silvia
Conti,1 and
Elisabetta
Surrenti2
Departments of
Pharmacology1 and Clinical
Pathophysiology,2 University of Florence,
Florence, Italy
Received 10 August 1998/Returned for modification 10 November
1998/Accepted 5 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The pharmacokinetics of dirithromycin were determined over a 72-h
period following oral administration of a single 500-mg dose to 8 healthy volunteers and to 16 cirrhotic patients (8 patients with class
A cirrhosis and 8 patients with class B cirrhosis according to Pugh's
& Child's classification). Drug levels in plasma and urine were
determined by microbiological assay. The mean maximum concentrations of
drug in serum obtained 3 to 4 h after administration were
0.29 ± 0.22 mg/liter in volunteers and 0.48 ± 0.21 and
0.52 ± 0.38 mg/liter in patients with class A and class B
cirrhosis, respectively. The elimination half-life
(t1/2
) was 23.3 ± 7.6 h in
healthy subjects and 35.2 ± 11.8 h and 39.5 ± 11.0 h in patients with class A and class B cirrhosis,
respectively. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)
and t1/2
were significantly higher in
patients with class A and B cirrhosis than in healthy controls, while
total and renal clearances were markedly reduced (P < 0.01). The time to the maximum concentration of drug in serum and the
volume of distribution values appeared to be similar in all groups, and
the mean recovery in urine at 72 h ranged from 3.7 to 5.7%,
without significant differences among groups. These results demonstrate
that some dirithromycin kinetic parameters are significantly different
in cirrhotic patients in comparison to those in healthy volunteers.
However, an increase in the t1/2
or AUC,
which is also observed with other semisynthetic macrolides (e.g.,
azithromycin), does seem to be not clinically relevant if one takes
into account both the high therapeutic indices of these antibiotics and
the usually short duration of therapy. Therefore, on the limited basis
of single-dose administration, no modifications of dirithromycin dosage
seem to be required even for patients with class B liver cirrhosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Dirithromycin is a new macrolide
that has a 14-member lactone ring and that is chemically related to
erythromycylamine. It is identified as (9S)-9-deoxo,
11-deoxy-9,11-[imino-[(1R)-2-(2-methoxy-ethoxy)ethylidene]oxy]erythromycin. Dirithromycin is rapidly and nonenzymatically hydrolyzed in vivo to
erythromycylamine, which is also microbiologically active and which has
an antimicrobial spectrum similar to that of erythromycin (3).
Under acid conditions this compound is more stable than natural
macrolides, which are poorly soluble in water and which are mostly
absorbed in the alkaline intestinal environment. Dirithromycin binds
mostly to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, and the mean plasma protein
binding, evaluated after intravenous administration, is as low as 19%
(13). The oral bioavailability of dirithromycin ranges from
6 to 14% and may be increased by food and H2 receptor antagonists (13). Following oral administration of 500 mg,
peak concentrations in serum (Cmaxs) of 0.3 to
0.7 mg/liter were observed after 4 to 5 h, with a mean elimination
half-life (t1/2
) that ranged from 29.6 to
44 h, which allows once-daily administration (1, 13).
Dirithromycin is rapidly and widely distributed into tissues at high
levels (0.8 to 5.0 mg/kg of body weight), usually about 20 to 40 times
the simultaneous concentrations in plasma, and has a large mean
apparent volume of distribution (V) of 800 liters (range,
504 to 1,041 liters) (1, 13). Urinary excretion is a minor
route of elimination (1.9 to 2.9%) and occurs within the first 48 h postadministration, while biliary elimination seems to be the primary
mechanism (a mean peak biliary concentration of 139 mg/liter has
been observed following oral administration of 500 mg as a single dose,
and after oral administration of 14C-radiolabelled
dirithromycin, 81 to 97% of the radioactivity appears in stools)
(1, 13).
In patients with hepatic failure, the pharmacokinetics of some
macrolide antibiotics are altered (10). Dirithromycin
pharmacokinetics have been studied only in patients with mild
cholestatic or parenchymal hepatic insufficiency (6).
The aim of the study described here was to investigate the
pharmacokinetics of a single dose of dirithromycin in patients with
mild and moderate parenchymal impairment of hepatic function to
establish a possible dose modification regimen.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patient selection.
Patients enrolled in this study were
between 18 and 70 years of age. Ethics Committee approval was obtained,
and patients gave written informed consent upon study entry. Control
subjects were confirmed to be healthy from their medical histories,
prestudy physical examinations, complete blood counts, blood
chemistries, and urinalyses. Patients with impaired hepatic function
were graded for the severity of their liver disease according to
Pugh's & Child's Classification System (11). We included
in the study only patients with Pugh's & Child's grade A and B
cirrhosis. The weights of the hepatically impaired patients were within
25% of the range of desirable weights outlined in the 1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance Tables; the weights of healthy control
subjects were within 10% of their ideal weights.
Exclusion criteria.
Exclusion criteria were any condition,
including significant underlying disease or concomitant infection,
which could preclude completion of the study; anticipated requirement
of treatment with systemic antibiotics; history of allergy or
hypersensitivity to erythromycin or other macrolide antibiotics;
pregnancy or postpartum state, lactation, or failure to use a reliable
method of birth control; use of any antimicrobial agents within 1 week
prior to enrollment; concurrent therapy with theophylline,
carbamazepine, cyclosporine, warfarin, phenytoin, alfentanil,
disopyramide, lovastatin or other 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme
A reductase inhibitors, hexobarbital, lactulose, or neomycin; and
Pugh's & Child's grade C dysfunction.
Study design.
This was an open-label, nonrandomized,
fixed-dose, inpatient and outpatient study.
Drug administration and sampling.
Twenty-four subjects,
including eight healthy volunteers with normal renal and hepatic
functions, eight patients with hepatic failure of grade A according to
Pugh's & Child's classification (11), and eight patients
with grade B hepatic dysfunction, entered the study. All subjects
received dirithromycin at 500 mg as a single dose in the form of two
250-mg capsules with 150 ml of water. Subjects fasted from midnight on
the preceding evening until 3 h after administration of the
dirithromycin dose. Smoking and intake of caffeine-containing beverages
were not permitted during the fasting period; however, water was freely
allowed. Blood samples were collected prior to administration of the
study drug and at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postdosing and were placed in heparinized tubes. The tubes were then
placed on ice and centrifuged. Urine was spot sampled between 0 and
96 h after administration of the dose at the following intervals: 0 to 6, 6 to 12, 12 to 18, 18 to 24, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, 48 to 72, and
72 to 96 h. Urine volume was recorded. Plasma and urine samples
were stored at
80°C until they were assayed.
Microbiological assay.
Dirithromycin concentrations in
plasma and urine were determined by a validated agar well diffusion
technique, according to good laboratory practice standards
(8). Antibiotic medium 2 (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) with 1.2%
1 N NaOH (pH 8.0) with a final pH of 8.5 was used, and
Micrococcus luteus NCTC 8340 was used as the test organism.
Standard concentrations were prepared daily in pooled human plasma for
blood samples (range, 0.64 to 0.0025 mg/liter) and in phosphate buffer
(pH 8.0) for urine samples (range, 0.64 to 0.01 mg/liter). The test
organism was added by the surface layer technique. After homogeneous
distribution of the culture, the excess liquid was removed with a
pipette. The plates were incubated at 37°C in air overnight. The
lower limit of sensitivity was 0.005 mg/liter for plasma and 0.02 mg/liter for urine. Best-fit standard curves were obtained by linear
regression analysis. The linearity was log y = 0.107x
3.6 for plasma samples and log y = 0.07x
2.3 for urine samples; the correlation coefficient was no less
than 0.99. For all samples, intra-assay precisions ranged from 4.5 to
7.5% and interassay precisions at a level of 0.12 mg/liter ranged from
3.5 to 4.7%.
Pharmacokinetic analysis.
Pharmacokinetic analysis of
concentrations in plasma was performed with a computerized program
(Siphar, version 4.0; SIMED) by using a two-compartment model on the
basis of the extended-least-squares regression method with the Powell
minimization algorithm, with first-order absorption from the dosing
site and elimination from the central compartment. The area under the
plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was determined by the trapezoidal
rule and was extrapolated to infinity. Cmax and
time to Cmax (Tmax) were
observed values. t1/2
was determined as
0.693/
(where
is the elimination rate constant), V
was obtained by dividing the total clearance (CL) by
, and CL was
calculated by dividing the dose by the AUC from 0 to 96 h
(AUC0-96) (4). Renal clearance
(CLR) was calculated by dividing the amount excreted in the
urine in the 24-h period by the AUC0-24 for plasma
(6). Statistical analysis of the data was performed by
one-way analysis of variance and Duncan's post-hoc test.
 |
RESULTS |
Table 1 summarizes the main
characteristics of the 24 subjects, who were subdivided into group I (8 cirrhotic patients with class A hepatic dysfunction), group II (8 cirrhotic patients with class B hepatic dysfunction), and group III (8 healthy volunteers). The mean ages were 55.1 ± 9.1 years for
group I, 57.1 ± 8.0 years for group II, and 31.6 ± 5.2 years for group III.
The subjects in the three groups were homogeneous with respect to
weight, height, blood urea nitrogen levels, and serum creatinine levels. However, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine
aminotransferase (ALT), serum phosphatase, serum bilirubin, and ammonia
levels were significantly higher in patients than in volunteers
(P values, at least <0.05). The cirrhotic patients in group
I had a mean Pugh's and Child's score of 5.7 ± 0.4, and those
in group II had a mean score of 7.9 ± 0.6. At the time of
investigation, none of the patients had encephalopathy, ascites, a
recent history of digestive tract hemorrhage, and/or infection.
Table 2 and Fig.
1 report the mean concentrations in
plasma versus time obtained for all three groups of subjects. Peak
levels ranged from 0.48 ± 0.21 to 0.52 ± 0.38 mg/liter for
cirrhotic patients, whereas the peak level was 0.29 ± 0.22 mg/liter for healthy subjects. Dirithromycin was still detectable in
all subjects, albeit at low concentrations (0.01 to 0.03 mg/liter),
72 h after administration.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Mean concentrations of dirithromycin in plasma after oral
administration of 500 mg to patients with impaired hepatic function
(groups I and II) and healthy subjects (group III)
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mean concentrations of dirithromycin in plasma after
oral administration of 500 mg to 16 patients with impaired hepatic
function ( , group I; , group II) and to 8 healthy volunteers
( , group III).
|
|
The values of the principal pharmacokinetic parameters are presented in
Table 3. The mean
Cmax observed for volunteers (0.29 ± 0.22 mg/liter) tended to be lower than those for group I and II patients
(0.48 ± 0.21 and 0.52 ± 0.38 mg/liter, respectively), although the difference was not statistically significant.
Tmax values were similar in all subjects (range,
3.5 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 1.4 h), while
t1/2
and the AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-
) were significantly higher in cirrhotic
patients.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Main pharmacokinetic parameters for dirithromycin after
oral administration of 500 mg to patients with impaired hepatic
function (groups I and II) and healthy
subjects (group III)a
|
|
CL and CLR values were significantly lower for patients
than for healthy volunteers (P < 0.01). Mean
concentrations in urine from 0 to 72 h were similar for all groups
and varied from 2.6 and 16.8 mg/liter (Table
4). The mean recovery in urine ranged from 3.7 to 5.7%.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Mean concentrations of dirithromycin in urine and urinary
recovery after oral administration of 500 mg to patients with
impaired hepatic function (groups I and II) and healthy
subjects (Group III)
|
|
After administration of dirithromycin, one patient in group II and two
patients in group III had transitory increased ALT and/or AST values,
without clinical signs.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The pharmacokinetics of macrolide antibiotics usually become
modified in patients with hepatic failure because the liver is the
major route of elimination of these agents (2, 6, 8, 10).
Only a few investigators, however, have suggested a dosage modification
when erythromycin, josamycin, or miocamycin are administered to
patients with hepatic disease (5, 9).
For macrolides, with special emphasis on the newer semisynthetic
derivatives, the extravascular compartment is of greater importance than the central compartment (6, 10). These
antibiotics also have high therapeutic indices and they are
usually used for a short duration of therapy, and therefore, an
increase in either t1/2
or AUC (e.g., with
azithromycin) or a decrease in nonrenal clearance (e.g., with
dirythromycin) does not seem to be clinically relevant in patients with
hepatic failure (1, 6, 8, 10). For the first time the
pharmacokinetics of dirithromycin have been studied in patients with
hepatic failure of grade B according to Pugh's & Child's
Classification (11), and our results demonstrate that the
kinetic behavior of the compound differs to some degree in patients
with both mild or moderate hepatic impairment in comparison to its
behavior in healthy subjects.
Cirrhotic patients have significantly higher AUCs and
t1/2
s than healthy subjects, and in these
patients both the CL and the CLR are also reduced. This
slower elimination rate is probably related to a decreased metabolic
capacity of the liver.
However, the possibility that the older ages of the cirrhotic patients
compared with those of the healthy subjects (55.1 to 57.1 versus 31.6 years, respectively) may have contributed to the reduced clearance of
dirithromycin from plasma cannot be excluded.
As a matter of fact, it is well known that increased age leads to
a progressive reduction of renal function. The issue of whether
liver function is compromised in the elderly population remains
unresolved, and it seems that geriatric patients have reduced hepatic
clearance of certain drugs, reflecting a decline in liver volume and
blood flow rather than reduced phase I metabolism (12, 14).
Recently, Le Couteur and McLean (7) have suggested that the
reduction in hepatic oxygen diffusion may provide one explanation for
the reduction of oxygen-dependent metabolism, while the increased hepatocyte volume would also modify oxygen diffusion path lengths (7).
None of the pharmacokinetic parameters studied were significantly
different between patients with mild or moderate cirrhosis. Our data
are in general agreement with those observed by LaBreque et al.
(6) after the administration of single or multiple doses of
dirithromycin in patients with grade A hepatic disease. Although statistically significant increases in AUC and
t1/2
and decreases in CLR were
found by those investigators in their patients with hepatic disease,
they concluded that no dosage adjustment would be necessary in patients
with mild hepatic insufficiency for a treatment lasting 14 days or less
(6).
In our opinion the higher Cmaxs observed in our
hepatic patients (although not statistically significant) are
consistent with the values of the other kinetic parameters evaluated
and suggest that, as expected, patients with liver disease, because
they are slower metabolizers, may slightly accumulate dirithromycin
during a therapeutic course, even increasing its distribution in tissue (6). This is because the kidneys do not function as a
vicarious organ during hepatic impairment, as confirmed by the
reduction in the CLR values and by the percent recovery in
urine (which were higher but not statistically significantly higher in
patients with hepatic disease in comparison to that in healthy volunteers).
However, on the basis of the similar patterns of absorption and
elimination observed in the three groups in our study after the
administration of a single dose and the great patient intervariability, by taking into account the greater importance of the extravascular compartment in comparison to the vascular one and the high therapeutic indices of the new semisynthetic macrolides, and in consideration of
the short duration of treatment, no modifications to the dosage of
dirithromycin seem to be required for patients with mild or moderate
hepatic impairment.
We should add that the mean half-life of dirithromycin in the plasma of
our cirrhotic patients (range, 35.2 to 39.5 h), although longer
than that determined for the volunteer group, does not substantially
differ from that reported in the literature for healthy subjects (29.6 to 44 h) (1, 13).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank L. Varanese and K. A. De Sante (Medical Division,
Eli Lilly) for helpful advice.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pharmacology, University of Florence, Viale G.B. Morgagni, 65, 50134-Florence, Italy. Phone: 39-55-4237410. Fax: 39-55-4361613. E-mail: mazzei{at}ds.unifi.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Brogden, R. N., and D. H. Peters.
1994.
Dirithromycin: a review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.
Drugs
48:599-616[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Chu, S. Y.,
G. R. Granneman,
P. J. Pichotta,
J. P. Decourt,
J. Girault, and J. B. Fourtillan.
1993.
Effect of moderate or severe hepatic impairment on clarithromycin pharmacokinetics.
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
33:480-485[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Counter, F. T.,
P. W. Ensminger,
D. A. Preston,
C.-Y. E. Wu,
J. M. Greene,
A. M. Felty-Duckworth,
J. W. Paschal, and H. A. Kirst.
1991.
Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of dirithromycin (AS-E 136; LY237216), a new macrolide antibiotic derived from erythromycin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:1116-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Gibaldi, M., and D. Perrier.
1982.
Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed.
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Kucers, A., and N. Bennett.
1987.
Erythromycin, p. 851-882.
In
The use of antibiotics. A comprehensive review with clinical emphasis., 4th ed. William Heinemann, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 6.
|
Labrecque, D. R.,
F. Johlin,
R. Janda,
T. Shreves,
D. Geraets,
K. DeSante,
B. Cerimele,
T. Lanier, and G. Sides.
1993.
Pharmacokinetics of dirithromycin in patients with impaired hepatic function.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
32:741-750[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Le Couteur, D. G., and A. J. McLean.
1998.
The aging liver. Drug clearance and an oxygen diffusion barrier hypothesis.
Clin. Pharmacokinet.
34:359-373[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Mazzei, T.,
C. Surrenti,
A. Novelli,
A. Crispo,
S. Fallani,
V. Carlà,
E. Surrenti, and P. Periti.
1993.
Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in patients with impaired hepatic function.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
31(Suppl. E):57-63[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Miglioli, P. A.,
P. Pivetta,
R. Orlando,
P. Palatini,
A. Varotto, and L. Okolicsanyi.
1989.
Pharmacokinetics of miocamycin in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Chemotherapy (Base 1)
35:330-332.
|
| 10.
|
Periti, P.,
T. Mazzei,
E. Mini, and A. Novelli.
1989.
Clinical pharmacokinetic properties of the macrolide antibiotics. Effects of age and various pathophysiological states (parts I-II).
Clin. Pharmacokinet.
16:193-214[Medline], 261-282.
|
| 11.
|
Pugh, R. N. H.,
I. M. Murray-Lyon,
J. L. Dawson,
M. C. Pietroni, and R. Williams.
1973.
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices.
Br. J. Surg.
60:646-649[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Schmucker, D. L.
1998.
Aging and the liver: an update.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.
53:B315-B320.
|
| 13.
|
Sides, G. D.,
B. J. Cerimele,
H. R. Black,
U. Busch, and K. A. DeSante.
1993.
Pharmacokinetics of dirithromycin.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
31(Suppl. C):65-75[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Woodhouse, K., and H. A. Wynne.
1992.
Age-related changes in hepatic function. Implications for drug therapy.
Drugs Aging
2:243-255[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 1999, p. 1556-1559, Vol. 43, No. 7
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.