This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Geslin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Geslin, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1999, p. 2099-2100, Vol. 43, No. 8
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Diminished Killing of Pneumococci by Pristinamycin Demonstrated by Time-Kill Studies


    LETTER
Top
Letter
References

Pristinamycin is a synergistic combination of streptogramin A (pristinamycin IIA) and streptogramin B (pristinamycin IB) compounds, licensed in France and some other European countries. This oral antibiotic has been considered as an alternative treatment for infections due to penicillin- and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae because streptogramins remain active against streptococci and pneumococci irrespective of their macrolide susceptibility status (10, 11). However, some treatment failures have been reported and may not be explained by pristinamycin resistance in vitro (2, 3). During its evaluation in our laboratory, the Vitek-II system (bioMérieux, Balmes-les-Grottes, France) classified a few strains among a selected collection of 100 multiresistant pneumococci as pristinamycin resistant (8a). Because this system uses a kinetic turbidimetric measurement of bacterial growth in the presence or absence of a known antibiotic concentration (9), we decided to perform time-kill studies to investigate the killing effect of pristinamycin against three strains classified as pristinamycin resistant by the Vitek II system and other selected isolates.

Eight clinical isolates and two reference pristinamycin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains (SP5500 [CIP104.448] and SP8906 [CIP104.486]) (6) were used in this study. Powders of known potency were obtained from Abbott, Rungis, France (erythromycin), Pharmacia & Upjohn, Paris La Défense, France (clindamycin), and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Paris, France (spiramycin and pristinamycin). Disk diffusion susceptibility and MICs were determined by the agar dilution method as previously described (13). To differentiate between the susceptible and intermediate-resistant categories or between the intermediate-resistant and resistant categories, the breakpoints recommended by the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (5) were, respectively, 1 and 4 µg/ml for erythromycin and spiramycin, 1 and 2 µg/ml for pristinamycin, and 2 µg/ml for clindamycin (no intermediate-resistant category). Time-kill effects were studied by growing bacteria (original inoculum, 106 CFU/ml) in brain heart infusion containing increasing dilutions of pristinamycin and spreading 0.05 ml of 10-fold serial dilutions of the culture onto blood agar plates at fixed times (13). The limit of detection of the technique was 20 CFU/ml. A bactericidal effect was defined as >= 99.9% killing of the original inoculum (reduction of viable bacteria >= 3 log10). Significant antibiotic carryover effect was excluded as initial bacterial counts of susceptible and control strains (inocula, 102 and 106 CFU/ml) were not changed in the presence or absence of a large amount of pristinamycin (1× to 8× the MIC). S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as a quality control strain for MIC determination and time-kill assays.

All clinical isolates were resistant to erythromycin (MIC > 128 µg/ml) and exhibited cross-resistance to spiramycin and clindamycin (MICs > 128 µg/ml), but they appeared to be susceptible to pristinamycin (MICs, 0.25 to 2 µg/ml). Reference strains SP5500 and SP8906 were susceptible to erythromycin (MIC, 0.125 µg/ml) and clindamycin (MIC, 0.125 µg/ml) but were resistant to spiramycin (MICs > 128 µg/ml); the MIC of pristinamycin was 8 µg/ml. Time-kill results (Table 1) were similar to those previously reported for pristinamycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and RPR106972 (1, 12): pristinamycin demonstrated a marked bactericidal activity against five of the eight clinical isolates tested, which were then classified as time-kill assay-susceptible strains. On the other hand, a more limited bactericidal effect was observed with pristinamycin during the first 6 h against the two pristinamycin-resistant pneumococci SP5500 and SP8906 and against the three remaining clinical strains (time-kill assay-resistant strains). The latter three strains had been classified as pristinamycin resistant by the Vitek-II system; they were, however, classified as susceptible to this antibiotic by disk diffusion and MIC determination assays. Against these five strains, pristinamycin was bactericidal only after 24 h at the higher concentrations (2× to 8× the MIC, i.e., 2 to 64 µg/ml).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Changes in bacterial counts after exposure to pristinamycin

In this study, we have identified and studied five pristinamycin time-kill assay-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Time-kill curves of these resistant strains exhibit an unusual diminution of the bactericidal effect of the streptogramin combination compared to regular susceptible strains. Because none of the previous studies investigating the efficacy of streptogramins against streptococci and pneumococci had reported such diminished bactericidal effect of pristinamycin, the cross-resistance to macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramin B (MLS) was always considered to preserve synergism between streptogramin components A and B (1, 10-12). However, reduced bactericidal activity of pristinamycin was demonstrated against some erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (4, 7) and Staphylococcus aureus (8) strains and was related to expression of a ribosomal erm methylase according to the MLS phenotype seen in disk diffusion susceptibility testing (4, 7, 8).

The incidence and the relevance of the diminished bactericidal effect of pristinamycin in S. pneumoniae remain unknown because this effect was not predicted by disk diffusion susceptibility testing or MIC determination using the agar dilution method. One should keep in mind that the strains we have tested had been selected because they were determined to be multiresistant; thus, no epidemiological information can be drawn from our observation.

In conclusion, our report demonstrates the absence of a reliable correlation between killing kinetics and usual routine laboratory tests for pristinamycin susceptibility testing of some pneumococci and suggests that changes in laboratory practices may be needed to efficiently detect this form of resistance. Because the new Vitek-II system is not yet widely used, we suggest that time-kill assays may improve detection of such pristinamycin killing-resistant pneumococci.


    FOOTNOTES

* Phone: 33.1.45.17.53.50

Fax: 33.1.45.17.53.49

E-mail: schlegel{at}pasteur.fr.


    REFERENCES
Top
Letter
References

1. Barackett, V., D. Lesage, F. Delisle, G. Richard, and J. C. Petit. 1997. Activité bactéricide du RP59500 et de la pristinamycine vis-à-vis des pneumocoques résistants à la pénicilline. Pathol. Biol. 45:438-440[Medline].
2. Brevet-Coupé, F., B. Guérin, and J. Watine. 1998. Failure of pristinamycin treatment in a case of pneumonia caused by a streptogramins B-type resistant pneumococcus. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 30:419-420[Medline].
3. Burucoa, C., T. Pasdeloup, C. Chapon, J. L. Fauchère, and R. Robert. 1995. Failure of pristinamycin treatment in a case of pneumococcal pneumonia. Eur. J. Clin. Microb. Infect. Dis. 14:341-342[Medline].
4. Caron, F., H. S. Gold, C. B. Wennersten, M. G. Farris, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos. 1997. Influence of erythromycin resistance, inoculum growth phase, and incubation time on assessment of the bactericidal activity of RP59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin) against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2749-2753[Abstract].
5. Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. 1998. Communiqué 1998. Pathol. Biol. 46:I-XVI.
6. Emond, J. P., A. Frémaux, A. Dublanchet, G. Sissia, P. Geslin, A. Sedalian, and G. Lionsquy. 1989. Resistance of two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to pristinamycin associated with 16-membered macrolides. Pathol. Biol. 37:791-792[Medline].
7. Fantin, B., R. Leclercq, L. Garry, and C. Carbon. 1997. Influence of inducible cross-resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B-type antibiotics in Enterococcus faecium on activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin in vitro and in rabbits with experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:931-935[Abstract].
8. Fantin, B., R. Leclercq, Y. Merlé, L. Saint-Julien, C. Veyrat, J. Duval, and C. Carbon. 1995. Critical influence of resistance to streptogramin B-type antibiotics on activity of RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin) in experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:400-405[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8a. Geslin, P. Unpublished data.
9. Ghanem, M., C. Meunier, V. Chaudet, C. Bradford, S. Fitzsimmons, and G. Zambardi. 1997. Reproducibility of MICs determined by a new system VITEK II. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 3(Suppl. 2):61.
10. Leclercq, R., and P. Courvalin. 1991. Intrinsic and unusual resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics in bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1273-1276[Free Full Text].
11. Leclercq, R., and P. Courvalin. 1998. Streptogramins: an answer to antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive bacteria. Lancet 352:591-592[Medline].
12. Pankuch, G. A., M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1996. MIC and time-kill study of antipneumococcal activities of RPR 106972 (a new oral streptogramin), RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), pyostacine (RP 7293), penicillin G, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and clarithromycin against 10 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2071-2074[Abstract].
13. Schlegel, L., G. Sissia, A. Frémaux, and P. Geslin. 1997. In vitro killing activity of combinations of beta -lactam agents with aminoglycosides against penicillin resistant pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:95-98[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Laurent Schlegel*
Geneviève Sissia
Annick Frémaux
Pierre Geslin
Centre National de Référence des Pneumocoques
Service de microbiologie
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal
40 Avenue de Verdun
94010 Créteil Cedex
France


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 1999, p. 2099-2100, Vol. 43, No. 8
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Geslin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Geslin, P.