Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1999, p. 2209-2214, Vol. 43, No. 9
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Efficacious Treatment of Experimental Leishmaniasis
with Amphotericin B-Arabinogalactan Water-Soluble Derivatives
Jacob
Golenser,1
Shoshana
Frankenburg,2,*
Tirtsa
Ehrenfreund,3 and
Abraham J.
Domb3
Department of Parasitology, Hebrew
University-Hadassah Medical School,1
Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Medical
Organization,2 and Department of
Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy-Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew
University of Jerusalem,3 Jerusalem, Israel
Received 16 November 1998/Returned for modification 6 January
1999/Accepted 14 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
In this study, we tested the efficacy of amphotericin B
(AmB)-arabinogalactan (AmB-AG) conjugates for the treatment of
experimental leishmaniasis. Chemical conjugation of AmB to a
water-soluble, biodegradable, and biocompatible polymer could present
many advantages over presently available AmB formulations. Two
conjugates were tested, a reduced (rAmB-AG) form and an unreduced
(uAmB-AG) form. In vitro, the drug concentrations which lower the
values of parasites (for promastigotes) or infected macrophages (for
amastigotes) to 50% of the untreated values (ED50s) of
uAmB-AG and rAmB-AG were 0.19 and 0.34 µg/ml, respectively, for
Leishmania major promastigotes and 0.17 and 0.31 µg/ml,
respectively, for amastigotes. The effect on Leishmania
infantum-infected macrophages was more marked, with ED50s of 0.035 µg/ml for rAmB-AG and 0.027 µg/ml for
uAmB-AG. In in vivo experiments, BALB/c mice injected with L. major were treated from day 2 onwards on alternate days for 2 weeks. Both conjugates, as well as liposomal AmB (all at 6 mg/kg of
body weight) and Fungizone (1 mg/kg), significantly delayed the
appearance of lesions compared to that in untreated mice. In addition,
both conjugates, but not liposomal AmB, were significantly more
effective than Fungizone. Subcutaneous injection of the conjugates (6 mg/kg) was significantly more effective than liposomal AmB in delaying the appearance of lesions. Higher AmB concentrations of up to 12 mg/kg
could be administered by this route. When an established infection was
treated, uAmB-AG was somewhat more effective than liposomal AmB. In
summary, water-soluble polymeric AmB derivatives were found effective
and safe for the treatment of leishmanial infections. The conjugates,
which are stable and can be produced relatively cheaply (compared to
lipid formulations), can be used in the future for the treatment of
leishmaniasis infections.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Amphotericin B (AmB), a polyene
antibiotic, is a standard drug for the treatment of fungal infections
and is currently recommended as a second-line treatment for visceral
leishmaniasis (VL) and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, especially with
human immunodeficiency virus coinfection. AmB has also been proven
effective as a first-line treatment for post-kala-azar dermal
leishmaniasis (20) and for VL in Europe and India (4,
8, 16).
AmB is a hydrophobic molecule with negligible solubility in aqueous
solution and poor solubility in most organic solvents. The marketed
formulation, Fungizone, forms a micellar dispersion after the addition
of water to the lyophilized sodium deoxycholate-AmB mixture. Fungizone
exhibits major clinical limitations. In systemic use, both the sodium
deoxycholate and AmB toxicities are not selective enough, and
therefore, the therapeutic index of Fungizone is narrow. Additionally,
the rather low maximal tolerated dose (1 mg/kg of body weight per day)
makes the drug ineffective in many cases of leishmanial infections,
especially when the immune status of the patient is compromised, and
therefore larger drug doses are necessary in order to kill parasites in
unusual locations (5, 14).
Lipid AmB formulations were examined in rodent models and found
effective against VL. Recently, AmB-containing liposomes, administered
intravenously (i.v.), have been successfully used for human VL. These
liposomes allow for the use of larger doses of the drug with much lower
side effects and toxicity (8, 11, 21). In addition, it has
been shown that mice treated with AmB liposomes have a persistent high
drug level in tissues (19). However, some problems, such as
the high cost of production and necessity of repeated i.v. infections
for successful treatment, prevent their widespread use.
Another approach to improving drug performance and reducing toxicity is
the conjugation to a polymeric carrier (15). Conjugation of
an insoluble drug such as AmB to a water-soluble biodegradable polymer
may increase the water solubility of the drug, drug circulation time,
and accumulation in the diseased tissue (15), resulting in
an improved therapeutic effect and reduced toxicity.
Arabinogalactan (AG) is a highly branched natural polysaccharide with
unusual water solubility (70% in water). It is extracted from the
Larix tree and it is available in a 99.9% pure form with reproducible molecular weight and physicochemical properties (1, 18). The high solubility in water, biocompatibility,
biodegradability, and ease of drug conjugation in an aqueous medium
make AG an attractive drug carrier.
AmB-AG conjugates have been synthesized and tested for efficacy against
common pathogenic fungi and for toxicity in mice. The conjugate
containing 20% by weight of AmB was soluble in water (>100 mg/ml),
was as effective as the parent drug, and possessed a 20-fold-lower
toxicity. In a direct comparison between the AmB-AG conjugate and
AmBisome, the most-effective and safe AmB formulation available, the
conjugate was superior in safety and in efficacy against fungal
infections (10). Another water-soluble polyene was also
recently shown to be active against Leishmania amazonensis and Leishmania donovani in mice (2).
The advantage of the development of new antileishmanial AmB derivatives
over other drugs is further stressed by the recently reported lack of
parasite resistance to AmB (9). In this study, we show the
effects of two AmB-AG derivatives, a reduced (rAmB-AG) form and an
unreduced (uAmB-AG) form, on leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes
in vitro and on Leishmania major infection in BALB/c mice.
(Part of this research was conducted by T. Ehrenfreund in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. from Hebrew University of
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
AmB-AG synthesis.
AmB (a gift from Dumex, Copenhagen,
Denmark) was conjugated to AG (a gift from Larex International, St.
Paul, Minn.) in two steps: first, AG was oxidized to dialdehyde AG with
potassium periodate in water at 25°C and purified from the
interfering oxidative anions (periodate and iodate) by passage through
an ion-exchange column of Dowex-1 (Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.) in acetate
form. Dowex-1 acetate was obtained by pretreating the commercial anion exchanger with 1 M acetic acid. The purified oxidized AG solution was
dialyzed through a 12,000-molecular-weight cutoff dialysis tubing
(Medicell International, London, United Kingdom) against deionized
water for 48 h at 4°C and lyophilized to dryness. This purification step was critical because AmB is very sensitive to oxidation. In the next step, AmB was bound to the oxidized AG by the
formation of an imine bond between the primary amine bond of AmB and
the aldehydes of the oxidized AG. Conjugation occurred in 0.1 M borate
buffer solution, pH 11, for 48 h under constant stirring. A clear
yellow-orange solution was obtained. The imine conjugate was purified
by dialysis and lyophilized to dryness. The average yield was 80%. The
imine (unreduced) conjugate (uAmB-AG) was reduced to a more stable
amine form by the addition of sodium borohydride powder (1.1 M
NaBH4/mol of saccharide units in the polymer) to the imine
conjugate solution, with overnight stirring at room temperature. The
average yield of this reaction was 90%. During the reduction process,
a clear change of color, from yellow-orange to light yellow, was
observed. The amine (reduced) conjugate (rAmB-AG) obtained was purified
by dialysis and lyophylized as described above for the imine conjugate.
Other AmB formulations used in this study.
Other AmB
formulations used in this study were Fungizone (Bristol Myers Squibb),
a mixed micelle formulation composed of AmB and sodium deoxycholate,
and AmBisome, a unilamellar liposome formulation (Vestar, San Dimas,
Calif.).
Parasites.
L. major parasites, strain WR1045, were
periodically isolated from BALB/c mice (Harlan Laboratories, Jerusalem,
Israel) and maintained in RPMI 1640 culture medium supplemented with
20% fetal calf serum (Biological Industries, Beth Haemek, Israel) at
28°C, by weekly passage, for no more than 2 months.
L. infantum parasites, strain LON 49 (MCAN/IL/94/LRC-639)
were isolated from an infected dog near Jerusalem. The original isolate
was frozen in aliquots which were thawed shortly before use. The
parasites were maintained in culture under the same conditions as those
of L. major.
In vitro effect on promastigotes.
Parasites, after 3 or 4 days of growth, were washed and resuspended in fresh medium containing
fetal calf serum to a concentration of 15 × 104
promastigotes in 200 µl and distributed into flat-bottom wells (96-well plate; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). The plates were incubated at
28°C in a wet chamber in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5%
O2, and 90% N2. After 24 h, 0.5 µCi of
[3H]thymidine (2 µCi/mmol; Nuclear Research Centre,
Neger, Israel) was added to each well, the parasites were incubated for
another 24 h, and then harvested on glass-microfiber filters.
Radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter. Each
treatment was performed in triplicate; the results are expressed as
percent growth inhibition. [(100
cpm of wells with drug)/cpm
of untreated wells] × 100 (cpm stands for counts per minute).
In vitro effect on amastigotes.
Peritoneal macrophages were
obtained from 10- to 12-week-old outbred mice previously stimulated for
4 or 5 days with 3% thioglycolate. The macrophages were distributed
into 8-well slides (Nunc) to 2.5 × 105 cells in 300 µl per well and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 3 h in order to allow for cell adhesion. The supernatant was
discarded, and promastigotes (8 × 105 to 10 × 105 per well) were added. After overnight incubation, fresh
medium containing the AmB derivatives was added for an additional 24 to
48 h. At the end of this period, the wells were washed, fixed with
methanol, and stained with Giemsa. Each treatment was done in duplicate
wells; in each well, 100 macrophages and the number of amastigotes they
contained were counted.
In vivo experiments.
Female BALB/c mice (Harlan
Laboratories) 6 to 10 weeks old, were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) in
the base of the tail with 2 × 104 stationary-phase
promastigotes, six to eight mice per experimental group. Drug treatment
was initiated 2 days after parasite injection or after the appearance
of lesions (1 month after parasite injection) and was administered six
times on alternate days. The drugs were given i.v. or s.c. in the
abdominal area, as detailed for each experiment. Once a week, mice were
checked for appearance of lesions, and lesion size was measured. To
determine the diameter, the average was taken between the longest
distance across the lesion and the length of the line bisecting this
distance at a 90° angle. Mice were kept in a sterile pathogen-free
animal facility throughout the experiments. In most cases, results are
presented as number of mice with lesions at a given time, since the
appearance of lesions is usually followed by a steady increase in
lesion size.
Statistical analyses.
Statistical evaluations were performed
by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The log rank test was used to
compare groups. Multiple comparisons were performed using Holm's
correction to the significance level. The SPSS program was used to run
the analyses.
 |
RESULTS |
Synthesis.
AmB was conjugated to oxidized AG in borate buffer
solution, pH 11, for 24 h at room temperature with an overall
yield of 85%. Lower pH resulted in a very low yield, while higher pH
resulted in increased toxicity. Pure water-soluble conjugates
containing 20% by weight of AmB were obtained as lyophilized powder.
The reduced conjugate where the drug is attached by a stable amine bond
was prepared by reducing the imine bond of the derivative using sodium
borohydride. The structure of the imine conjugate is shown in Fig.
1.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Structure of uAmB-AG conjugate. rAmB-AG is obtained by
reduction of the double bond N C between AmB and the sugar.
|
|
Effects of AmB-AG conjugates on parasites in vitro (Table
1).
First, AmB-AG was added to
promastigote cultures, and its leishmanicidal effect was compared to
that of Fungizone. The results using L. major show that the
drug concentration which lowers the value of parasites (for
promastigotes) or infected macrophages (for amastigotes) to 50% of the
untreated values (ED50) of Fungizone was lowest (0.02 µg/ml), while the ED50s of uAmB-AG and rAmB-AG were 0.19 and 0.34 µg/ml, respectively. The leishmanicidal effect on L. infantum was considerably higher: 0.01 µg/ml for Fungizone, 0.03 µg/ml for uAmB-AG, and 0.06 µg/ml for rAmB-AG.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Effects of AmB-AG conjugates and Fungizone on L. major and L. infantum promastigotes and amastigotes
in vitroa
|
|
Second, the effect of the derivatives on intracellular L. major amastigotes was determined in infected macrophage cultures. The percentage of infected macrophages was reduced by both conjugates (ED50s of 0.17 µg/ml for uAmB-AG and 0.31 µg/ml for
rAmB-AG). The effect on L. infantum-infected macrophages was
even more marked, with an ED50 of 0.035 µg/ml for rAmB-AG
and 0.027 µg/ml for uAmB-AG.
Incubation of infected macrophages in the presence of the conjugates
also reduced the number of amastigotes per macrophage: while most
untreated macrophages contained one to six amastigotes, 85% of the
macrophages treated with 0.25 µg of uAmB-AG per ml and 45% of the
macrophages treated with 0.25 µg of rAmB-AG per ml contained no
parasites (Fig. 2).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effects of AmB conjugates and Fungizone on the number of
amastigotes in infected macrophages. The conjugates were added for
48 h to macrophages containing L. major amastigotes.
The number of amastigotes per macrophage was counted by microscopic
evaluation.
|
|
Effects of AmB-AG derivatives on the course of infection.
BALB/c mice were injected in the rump with L. major
promastigotes and treated on alternate days with 6 i.v. injections
of Fungizone (1 mg/kg/day), AmBisome, or the AmB-AG conjugates (6 mg/kg/day), starting on day 2 after parasite injection. Mice were checked weekly for the appearance of lesions. Figure
3 presents the results of one typical
experiment (of four performed, although not every experiment included
all groups). Cumulative data of all experiments show that rAmB-AG
(n = 23), uAmB-AG (n = 11), AmBisome
(n = 16), and Fungizone (n = 14)
significantly delayed the appearance of lesions (P < 0.0000) from that of untreated mice. In addition, rAmB-AG and
uAmB-AG, but not AmBisome, were significantly more effective than
Fungizone (P < 0.03 and 0.0001, respectively).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of i.v. treatment with AmB derivatives on the
appearance of lesions caused by L. major in BALB/c mice.
Mice infected with L. major were treated with 6 i.v.
injections of Fungizone (1 mg/kg/day), AmBisome, or AmB-AG conjugates
(6 mg/kg/day) on alternate days. Lesion appearance was monitored
weekly.
|
|
In another experiment, treatment by s.c. injection of the drugs was
compared to i.v. treatment. AmBisome at 6 mg/kg had no significant
effect when injected s.c. or i.v. However, s.c. injection of 12 mg/kg
was more effective than the control (P < 0.0008) or than 6 mg/kg (P < 0.0017). uAmB-AG (6 mg/kg, i.v. or
s.c.) was significantly more effective than the controls (0.0013 and
0.0003, respectively) or AmBisome given i.v. (0.007 and 0.0023, respectively) and s.c. (0.0023 and 0.0006, respectively) (Table
2). Figure 4 summarizes the mean lesion area data
for the mice from this experiment. The data show that, after 10 weeks,
there is a marked difference not only in the number of mice with
lesions but also in lesion size. It should be stressed that all the
mice received the same parasite inoculum. The effects of treatment of
an established infection with uAmB-AG and with AmBisome were examined.
Treatment was started after lesions appeared, 1 month after parasite
injection. While lesion size continued to increase in the control
group, lesion size remained stable or decreased in the treated groups. The conjugate was slightly more effective than AmBisome (Fig. 5). However, the number of animals was
too small to draw definite conclusions from this experiment.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Effects of AmB-AG conjugates and AmBisome administered
i.v. or s.c. on the time of lesion appearance in
BALB/c micea
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Comparison of s.c. and i.v. treatment of L. major-infected mice with AmB derivatives. Mice infected with
L. major were treated, starting 2 days after infection, with
6 i.v. or s.c. injections of AmBisome or AmB-AG conjugates (6 or
12 mg/kg/day) on alternate days. Lesion size was measured weekly.
Symbols: , control; , AmBisome, i.v., 6 mg/kg; , AmBisome,
s.c., 6 mg/kg; , AmBisome, s.c., 12 mg/kg; , uAmB-AG, i.v., 6 mg/kg; , uAmB-AG, s.c., 6 mg/kg; , uAmB-AG, s.c., 12 mg/kg; ,
rAmB-AG, s.c., 12 mg/kg.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effects of uAmB-AG and AmBisome on an established
L. major infection. BALB/c mice were treated with uAmB-AG or
AmBisome after the appearance of lesions (1 month after parasite
injection). Lesion size was measured weekly, starting with the
initiation of treatment. Each line represents lesion changes in an
individual mouse.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In recent years, AmB lipid formulations have been developed and
have been shown to be effective and significantly less toxic than
Fungizone. Three lipid formulations are now marketed for clinical use
in many countries worldwide (12). The efficacy of these
formulations has been evaluated in mouse models of VL. Liposomal AmB
was about three times more active against L. infantum than
Fungizone and was not toxic (19). In L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice, the overall efficacy of AmBisome
was equal to that of Amphocil and higher than that of Abelcet.
Fungizone was the least effective AmB compound tested (17).
In a murine L. major model for VL in which mice were treated
starting 3 to 4 weeks after parasite injection, 25 and 12.5 mg of
AmBisome per kg induced a reduction in lesion size, but 6.25 mg/kg was
ineffective. In this model, 25 mg/kg, when injected s.c. close to the
lesion, caused a small insignificant reduction in lesion size.
Fungizone (1 mg/kg) was inactive both i.v. and s.c. (21).
In all studies with mice, as well as with humans (8), all
lipid formulations must be repeatedly administered i.v. in order to be
effective. An additional disadvantage of the lipid formulations, which
may prevent their widespread use, is their high cost to the patient
(7).
In this study, we have evaluated the efficacy of a new type of
water-soluble AmB compound for the treatment of experimental leishmaniasis based on the conjugation of AmB to a highly branched polysaccharide, which may overcome some of the disadvantages of lipid
AmB formulations.
The main difference between the conjugated drug and the lipid-based
formulations is that the latter are particulate systems that may be
unstable physically and chemically and they are difficult to sterilize
by filtration. The conjugated AmB, however, is water soluble, easily
sterilized by filtration, and physically and chemically stable as
lyophilized powder and as reconstituted solution. The conjugated
AmB-AG, loaded with up to 40% drug by weight, has a molecular weight
of 20,000, is highly water soluble (>10% [wt/vol] in water for
injection) and biodegradable, and is thus expected to be safely
eliminated from the body.
The preparation of the conjugate involves two independent steps which
are conducted at room temperature using water solutions with no organic
solvents involved. There is essentially one reagent, potassium
periodate, that is used besides AG and AmB. The first step is the
formation of pure oxidized AG which is conducted by dissolving AG into
a solution of the oxidizing agent, periodate, and allowing the
oxidation to occur for a few hours at room temperature. The oxidized AG
with about 38% of its saccharide units oxidized to dialdehydes is
purified by ion-exchange chromatography to remove excess periodate and
lyophilized to a powder that is stable at refrigeration for at least 1 year. The conjugation step is conducted at room temperature in borate
buffer solution, pH 11, at which the drug has some solubility. The
reaction solution is filtered and dialyzed to remove unreacted drug and
salts and lyophilized to form a yellow powder which is easily
reconstituted prior to use. If the reduced conjugate is desired, the
conjugate solution is reacted with excess sodium borohydride prior to
dialysis and lyophilization. As described, the method of preparation
and reagents are simple and inexpensive, which may make this product
available for treating leishmania infections in poor countries.
Both AmB-AG conjugates were initially prepared and investigated for
treating fungal infections. Both were found very effective against
candidiasis and Cryptococcus infections in mice with the unreduced conjugate being more effective, as described elsewhere (10). Studies conducted on mice indicated that both
conjugates are at least as safe as AmBisome with maximal tolerated
doses in the range of 50 mg of AmB equivalents per kg or 250 mg of the conjugated product per kg (10).
The two AmB-AG derivatives evaluated in this study, the reduced
(rAmB-AG) and unreduced (uAmB-AG) forms were consistently more
effective than Fungizone and often also more effective than AmBisome
for the treatment of leishmania infection, when treatment was started 2 days after parasite injection (Fig. 3 and 4). The unreduced conjugate
was also more effective than AmBisome for the treatment of an
established leishmanial infection (Fig. 5).
In both in vivo and in vitro experiments, uAmB-AG was more effective
than rAmB-AG against L. major. The higher efficacy of this
conjugate may be related to the fact that the imine bond of the
unreduced form is less hydrolytically stable than the amine bond of the
reduced form, thus making AmB more easily released from the carrier
molecule. If this is the case, the data presented here suggest that the
performance of the imine-conjugated AmB-AG may be affected by similar
delivery systems such as amphiphile-based assemblies containing AmB
(6, 13).
Upon comparison of the effects of AmB-AG on L. major and
L. infantum, it appears that the ED50 for
L. infantum is lower than the ED50 for L. major for both promastigotes and amastigotes. Since the same is
true for Fungizone (Table 1 and results not shown), and for pentavalent
antimonial drugs (3), this is probably due to an intrinsic
difference between L. major and L. infantum rather than to a characteristic of the AmB-AG conjugate. Regarding the
effects of AmB-AG on amastigotes and promastigotes, the
ED50 for amastigotes was lower than for promastigotes.
Similar results were reported for Fungizone and AmBisome
(21). Taken together, these data suggest that AmB
administered as a polysaccharide conjugate does not interfere with the
known mechanism of AmB administered as an amphiphile-based assembly.
We have shown here that higher doses of AmB-AG can be administered by
the s.c. as well as by the i.v. route. The fact that fewer mice
developed lesions after s.c. injection with higher doses of uAmB-AG
stresses the advantage of s.c. injections. In addition to allowing for
the administration of higher drug dosages, the s.c. route represents a
method of slow drug release, thus lowering the toxicity of AmB.
In summary, water-soluble polymeric AmB derivatives were found
effective and safe for treating leishmanial infections in mice. Such
treatment could also be used for animal and human infections.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported in part by the Leslie Nicholas Fund and
the Gras Center for Pharmaceutical Research. A. Domb is affiliated with
the David Bloom Center for Pharmacy, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
We thank Leah Rosen for excellent statistical advice. We thank the
Dumex Company for the gift of AmB.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Dermatology, Hadassah Medical Organization, P.O. Box 12 000, Jerusalem, 91 120, Israel. Phone: 9722 677 8442. Fax: 9722 643 4434. E-mail: franks{at}cc.huji.ac.il.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, M. F., and C. Douglas.
1963.
Arabinogalactan a review of the literature.
TAPPI
46:544-558.
|
| 2.
|
Al-Abdely, H. M.,
J. R. Graybill,
R. Bocanegra,
L. Najvar,
E. Montalbo,
S. L. Regen, and P. C. Melby.
1998.
Efficacies of KY62 against Leishmania amazonensis and Leishmania donovani in experimental murine cutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2542-2548[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Allen, S., and R. A. Neal.
1989.
The in vitro susceptibility of macrophages infected with amastigotes of Leishmania spp. to pentavalent antimonial drugs and other compounds with special relevance to cutaneous isolates, p. 711.
In
D. T. Hart (ed.), Leishmaniasis. Plenum Publishing Corporation, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 4.
|
Berman, J. D.
1997.
Human leishmaniasis: clinical, diagnostic, and chemotherapeutic developments in the last 10 years.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:684-703[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chabot, G. G.,
R. Pazdur,
F. A. Valeriote, and L. H. Baker.
1989.
Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of continuous infusion of amphotericin B in cancer patients.
J. Pharm. Sci.
78:307-310[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cohen, R.,
I. Polacheck,
S. Benita,
M. Levi, and Y. Barenholz.
1996.
Comparative evaluation of five types of amphiphile-based assemblies containing amphotericin B.
In
Program and Abstracts of the Conference on Liposome Advances: Progress in Drug Delivery and Vaccine Delivery. Centre for Drug Delivery Research, School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 7.
|
Coukell, A. J., and R. N. Brogden.
1998.
Liposomal amphotericin B. Therapeutic use in the management of fungal infections and visceral leishmaniasis.
Drugs
55:585-612[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
di Martino, L.,
R. N. Davidson,
R. Giacchino,
S. Scotti,
F. Raimondi,
E. Casstagnola,
L. Tasso,
A. Cascio,
L. Gradoni,
M. Gramiccia,
M. Pettoellomantovani, and A. D. M. Bryceson.
1997.
Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in children with liposomal amphotericin B.
J. Pediatr.
131:271-277[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Durand, R.,
M. Paul,
F. Pratlong,
D. Rivollet,
M. L. Dubreuil-Lemaire,
R. Houin,
A. Astier, and M. Deniau.
1998.
Leishmania infantum: lack of parasite resistance to amphotericin B in a clinically resistant visceral leishmaniasis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2141-2143[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Falk, R.,
A. J. Domb, and I. Polacheck.
1999.
A novel injectable water-soluble amphotericin B-arabinogalactan conjugate.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1975-1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gangneux, J. P.,
A. Sulahian,
Y. J. F. Garin, and F. Derouin.
1996.
Lipid formulations of amphotericin B in the treatment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
90:574-577[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hiemenz, J. W., and T. J. Walsh.
1996.
Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: recent progress and future directions.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
2:S133-S144.
|
| 13.
|
Legrand, P.,
M. Cheron,
L. Leroy, and J. Bolard.
1997.
Release of amphotericin B from delivery systems and its action against fungal and mammalian cells.
J. Drug Target.
4:311-319[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Maddux, M. S., and S. L. Barriere.
1980.
A review of complications of amphotericin B therapy: recommendation for prevention and management.
Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm.
14:177-181.
|
| 15.
|
Maeda, H.
1994.
Polymer-conjugated macromolecular drugs for tumor-specific targetting, p. 95-116.
In
A. Domb (ed.), Polymeric site-specific pharmacotherapy. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.
|
| 16.
|
Mishra, M.,
U. K. Biswas,
A. M. Jha, and A. B. Khan.
1994.
Amphotericin versus sodium stibogluconate in first-line treatment of Indian kala-azar.
Lancet
344:1599-1600[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Mullen, A. B.,
K. C. Carter, and A. J. Baillie.
1997.
Comparison of the efficacies of various formulations of amphotericin B against murine visceral leishmaniasis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:2089-2092[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Nazareth, M. R.,
V. L. Narayanan, and V. A. Bhatia.
1961.
Studies on the larch arabogalactan II.
J. Pharm. Sci.
50:564-567.
|
| 19.
|
Paul, M.,
R. Durand,
H. Fessi,
D. Rivollet,
R. Houin,
A. Astier, and M. Deniau.
1997.
Activity of a new liposomal formulation of amphotericin B against two strains of Leishmania infantum in a murine model.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1731-1734[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Thakur, C. P.,
S. Narain,
N. Kumar,
S. M. Hassan,
D. K. Jha, and A. Kumar.
1997.
Amphotericin B is superior to sodium antimony gluconate in the treatment of Indian post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis.
Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol.
91:611-616[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Yardley, V., and S. Croft.
1997.
Activity of liposomal amphotericin B against experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:752-756[Abstract].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1999, p. 2209-2214, Vol. 43, No. 9
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Falk, R., Hacham, M., Nyska, A., Foley, J. F., Domb, A. J., Polacheck, I.
(2005). Induction of interleukin-1{beta}, tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} and apoptosis in mouse organs by amphotericin B is neutralized by conjugation with arabinogalactan. J Antimicrob Chemother
55: 713-720
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanchez-Brunete, J. A., Dea, M. A., Rama, S., Bolas, F., Alunda, J. M., Raposo, R., Mendez, M. T., Torrado-Santiago, S., Torrado, J. J.
(2004). Treatment of Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis with Amphotericin B in Stable Albumin Microspheres. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3246-3252
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Falk, R., Grunwald, J., Hoffman, A., Domb, A. J., Polacheck, I.
(2004). Distribution of Amphotericin B-Arabinogalactan Conjugate in Mouse Tissue and Its Therapeutic Efficacy against Murine Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3606-3609
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Larabi, M., Yardley, V., Loiseau, P. M., Appel, M., Legrand, P., Gulik, A., Bories, C., Croft, S. L., Barratt, G.
(2003). Toxicity and Antileishmanial Activity of a New Stable Lipid Suspension of Amphotericin B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3774-3779
[Abstract]
[Full Text]