Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 1999, p. 2323-2327, Vol. 43, No. 9
Departments of
Pharmacy1 and Critical Care
Medicine,
Received 2 November 1998/Returned for modification 7 March
1999/Accepted 20 June 1999
The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin, administered in high doses
and with extended dosing intervals, was studied in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Thirty patients received either 750 mg of the drug or a placebo once daily for 14 days,
followed by 750 mg or 1,000 mg of the drug or a placebo three times
weekly for an additional 14 days. Levofloxacin disposition was
characterized by rapid oral absorption, with peak concentrations occurring approximately 1.5 h after dosing and elimination
half-lives from 7.2 to 9.4 h. The overall incidence of any adverse
effect was 70% (1,000 mg) to 95% (750 mg) for levofloxacin-treated
patients and 71% for those taking the placebo. Levofloxacin
pharmacokinetic parameters for HIV-infected patients were consistent
with those observed in studies of healthy volunteers.
Patients infected with human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are known to be highly susceptible to
coinfection with mycobacterial species, especially Mycobacterium
avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(3, 7). For patients with HIV and disseminated MAC that is
resistant to macrolides, clinicians often prescribe complex regimens
that may include a quinolone, such as levofloxacin (1). In
addition, for therapy of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), the
use of levofloxacin may be considered. Levofloxacin has been shown to
be active against tuberculosis in vitro with an MIC at which 90% of
the isolates are inhibited of <1.0 µg/ml (9). Recent
clinical data suggest that levofloxacin may be of some utility in
patients with MDR-TB (10).
Levofloxacin is a fluorinated quinolone antibiotic with a broad
spectrum of activity. It possesses a favorable pharmacokinetic profile,
with wide distribution into tissues and macrophages, good oral
absorption, and a long half-life (t1/2) which
allows for once-daily dosing (2, 4). It is eliminated
renally and thus does not cause interactions with the myriad of drugs
used for HIV infection that are metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 system.
The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in healthy volunteers and in
patients with asymptomatic HIV infection has been well described (4, 5). Its disposition in patients with advanced HIV
infection has not been studied. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of
levofloxacin when higher doses are administered over extended intervals
has not been evaluated. Such doses, administered two or three times weekly, would facilitate directly observed therapy. The purpose of this
study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and safety of
levofloxacin in HIV-infected patients when it is administered in higher
doses at extended intervals.
This was a sequential, two-part, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study of HIV-infected patients. Inclusion criteria included documented HIV infection (positive by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay and Western blot test), an age of The 750-mg dose consisted of one 500-mg tablet, two 125-mg tablets, and
two placebo tablets. The 1-g dose consisted of one 500-mg tablet and
four 125-mg tablets. Placebo and drug supplies appeared to be
identical. Patients were instructed to fast for at least 6 h prior
to the administration of the morning dose and to consume breakfast
2 h after each dose. In the event of nausea, subsequent doses were
given with food (one patient).
On days 1, 14, 15, and 26, patients were admitted to the hospital and
serial blood samples were collected prior to dosing and then at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h after dosing. Samples were also
drawn at 48 and 72 h after the final dose on day 26. Quantitative
urine collections were performed between 0 and 2, 2 and 4, 4 and 8, 8 and 12, and 12 and 24 h on the study days listed above. Urine was
also collected between 24 and 48 and 48 and 72 h following the
last dose. Blood samples were collected just prior to and then 2 h
after dosing on days 5, 13, and 24 to monitor adherence.
Patients were allowed to receive concomitant antiretroviral therapy
during the study. Drugs were selected by each patient's referring
health care provider based on clinical judgment. Didanosine and
levofloxacin doses were separated by at least 2 h.
The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board
of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma were determined by
high-pressure liquid chromatography by using a published assay (12). The assay was linear over the concentration range
studied, and the lower limit of quantitation was 0.08 µg/ml. The
inter- and intraday coefficient of variation was <10%.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by standard noncompartmental
analysis (8). Maximum concentration and time to maximum
concentration (Tmax) were determined directly
from concentration-time profiles. Area under the concentration-time
curve (AUC) was calculated by the trapezoidal summation method. The
elimination rate constant (kel) was determined
by log-linear regression analysis of concentration-time data by using
data points with a correlation coefficient of no less than 0.95. The
t1/2 was calculated as
0.693/kel. The maximum concentration in urine
was determined by inspection of urine concentration-versus-time profiles. The Ae was the cumulative amount of
levofloxacin excreted in the urine. Renal clearance (CLR)
was calculated by dividing the Ae over 24 h
by the AUC from 0 to 24 h. Creatinine clearance (CLCR)
at baseline was estimated by using the Cockcroft-Gault equation, with
correction for gender (6).
The safety of levofloxacin was evaluated by clinical laboratory testing
as well as subjective assessment by patient interview and record keeping.
Statistics.
The effects of prestudy CLCR, CD4
count (<250 or >250 cells/mm3), and dose on total body
clearance on day 26 were studied by using general linear regression
modeling of the data. The effects of these covariates were tested at
the 5% level of significance with the SAS statistical program version
6.09. Similar regression models were also used to study the effects of
CLCR, CD4 count, and dose on CLR on day 26. The
adverse effects of different treatment regimens were analyzed by a
Pearson's chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Subjects.
Thirty-one subjects were enrolled and randomized
into the study. Results from one subject who did not receive study
medication are not included in the analysis. Thirty subjects, including
four subjects who discontinued the study prematurely and were replaced, received levofloxacin or the placebo. There were 28 males and 2 females, and the mean age was 35.5 ± 7.1 years. Eleven patients received 750 mg of levofloxacin throughout the study, twelve patients received 750 mg of levofloxacin daily (q.d.) followed by 1,000 mg of
levofloxacin three times a week (t.i.w.), and seven patients received
the placebo. Of those patients receiving levofloxacin, 11 had CD4
counts below 250 cells/mm3 (median, 123 cells/mm3; range, 4 to 249 cells/mm3) and 12 had CD4 counts above 250 cells/mm3 (median, 421 cells/mm3; range, 295 to 772 cells/mm3).
Antiretroviral therapies were comparable between groups, although the
majority of patients were receiving monotherapy or no therapy, since
only four nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors were
available at the time of the study.
Safety.
Adverse effects experienced by treatment and placebo
groups are shown in Table 1. Adverse
events were noted with high frequency in both levofloxacin- and
placebo-treated patients. The overall incidence of any adverse effect
was 70% (for the group receiving 1,000 mg t.i.w.) to 95% (for the
group receiving 750 mg q.d.) for levofloxacin-treated patients and 71%
for those taking the placebo. No significant differences in the
incidence of adverse effects in levofloxacin and placebo groups were
noted. Most adverse effects were mild. Only two patients had to
discontinue levofloxacin treatment, one because of fatigue, dizziness,
and nausea and the other due to severe pruritus. Gastrointestinal side
effects of nausea and diarrhea were the most common complaints,
followed by headache, flatulence, and fatigue. Four subjects did not
complete the study for non-medication-related reasons: two patients
were excused for inability to obtain venous access, and two patients decided to withdraw. Levofloxacin concentrations were within the normal
ranges on days 5, 13, and 24, suggesting that patients adhered to the
prescribed regimen.
Pharmacokinetics.
Mean concentration-time curves of
levofloxacin for each dose group are shown in Fig.
1 and 2.
Mean pharmacokinetic parameters are given in Table
2. Levofloxacin disposition was
characterized by rapid oral absorption, with peak concentrations
occurring approximately 1.5 h after dosing. Levofloxacin
pharmacokinetic parameters remained linear and constant throughout
study days 1, 14, 15, and 26. The mean interday coefficients of
variation in Tmax, t1/2,
and oral clearance (CL/F) were 28, 20, and 13%, respectively.
Following multiple 750-mg q.d. doses, the mean ratio of the AUC on day
14 to that on day 1 was 1.29 (standard deviation, 0.33), indicating some accumulation upon multiple dosing.
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of High-Dose and Extended-Interval
Regimens of Levofloxacin in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected
Patients

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
18 years, and
laboratory test results within defined protocol limits. Subjects were
excluded if they had allergies to quinolones, had experienced vomiting or diarrhea within 48 h of screening, or had HIV wasting syndrome. Subjects were randomized to one of the three treatment groups listed
below and were stratified by CD4 count (less than and greater than 250 cells/mm3). Patients received levofloxacin or the placebo
once daily from days 1 to 14 and three times weekly from days 15 to 26. The doses were as follows: for group 1, 750 mg of levofloxacin
throughout; for group 2, 750 mg of levofloxacin on days 1 to 14 and
1,000 mg of levofloxacin on days 15 to 26; and for group 3, placebo throughout.
TABLE 1.
Number of subjects with reported adverse effects

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Mean plasma concentration-versus-time profiles of
levofloxacin in HIV-seropositive subjects following daily (days 1 to
14) and thrice-weekly (days 15 to 26) 750-mg oral doses.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Mean plasma concentration-versus-time profiles of
levofloxacin in HIV-seropositive subjects following a dose change from
750 mg to 1 g on day 15 and after thrice-weekly 1-g doses of the
drug were administered orally from days 15 to 26.
TABLE 2.
Levofloxacin
pharmacokinetic parametersa
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bldg. 10, Rm. 11C103, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr. MSC 1880, Bethesda, MD 20892-1880. Phone: (301) 402-0564. Fax: (301) 402-4097. E-mail: rwalker{at}nih.gov.
Present address: Section of Infectious Diseases, National Naval
Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alangaden, G. J., and S. A. Lerner. 1997. The clinical use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of mycobacterial diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:1213-1221[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Andrews, J. M.,
D. Honeybourne,
G. Jevons,
N. P. Brenwald,
B. Cunningham, and R. Wise.
1997.
Concentrations of levofloxacin (HR 355) in the respiratory tract following a single oral dose in patients undergoing fibre-optic bronchoscopy.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:573-577 |
| 3. |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1998.
Tuberculosis morbidity United States, 1997.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
47:253-257[Medline].
|
| 4. | Chien, S.-C., M. C. Rogge, L. G. Gisclon, C. Curtin, F. Wong, J. Natarajan, R. R. Williams, C. L. Fowler, W. K. Cheung, and A. T. Chow. 1997. Pharmacokinetic profile of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral and intravenous doses. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2256-2260[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Chien, S. C., A. T. Chow, M. C. Rogge, R. R. Williams, and C. W. Hendrix. 1997. Pharmacokinetics and safety of oral levofloxacin in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals receiving concomitant zidovudine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1765-1769[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Cockcroft, D. W., and M. H. Gault. 1976. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31-41[Medline]. |
| 7. | Cohn, D. L. 1997. Prevention strategies for Mycobacterium avium-intracellular complex (MAC) infection. A review of recent studies in patients with AIDS. Drugs 54(Suppl. 2):8-15. |
| 8. | Gibaldi, M., and D. Perrier. 1982. Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 9. |
Mor, N.,
J. Vanderkolk, and L. Heifets.
1994.
Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of levofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro and in human macrophages.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:1161-1164 |
| 10. | Peloquin, C. A., M. D. Iseman, G. A. Huitt, and S. E. Berning. 1998. Levofloxacin for drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ann. Pharmacother. 32:268-269[Medline]. (Letter.) |
| 11. | Rastogi, N., K. S. Goh, A. Bryskier, and A. Devallois. 1996. Spectrum of activity of levofloxacin against nontuberculous mycobacteria and its activity against the Mycobacterium avium complex in combination with ethambutol, rifampin, roxithromycin, amikacin, and clofazimine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2483-2487[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Wog, F. A., S. J. Juzwin, and S. C. Flor. 1997. Rapid stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of levofloxacin in human plasma and urine. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 15:765-771[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»