Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2000, p. 164-166, Vol. 44, No. 1
Departments of
Medicine1 and Orthopedic
Surgery,2 University of Kentucky Medical
Center, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0084
Received 1 February 1999/Returned for modification 24 July
1999/Accepted 11 October 1999
The efficacy and safety of three oral fluoroquinolones
(lomefloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin) for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis were analyzed. Twenty-seven patients had documented infections with quinolone-sensitive organisms and
received either lomefloxacin, levofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin.
Levofloxacin was effective therapy for 9 of 15 (60%) patients.
Lomefloxacin was effective therapy for five of seven (71%) patients,
and ciprofloxacin was effective therapy for two of five patients
(40%). Average follow-up was 11.8 months for patients who completed
the course of therapy, and the average duration of therapy was 60.6 days. Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from 18 patients, and 11 patients were cured. Oral fluoroquinolones can be safe, effective therapy if they are given for a prolonged course as treatment for
infections caused by susceptible gram-positive as well as gram-negative organisms and in combination with adequate surgical debridement.
This paper describes the outcomes
for an additional 27 patients (patients 81 to 107) treated for
osteomyelitis in our clinical trials in which we are evaluating
quinolone therapy. Our first 80 patients participated in clinical
trials in which we evaluated ciprofloxacin therapy and have been
described elsewhere (1-3). The objectives of the study were
to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin, high-dose
lomefloxacin (800 mg every 12 h), or levofloxacin for the
treatment of chronic osteomyelitis caused by susceptible organisms.
Patients were enrolled in either a prospective, randomized, nonblinded
trial that compared ciprofloxacin to lomefloxacin or in an open trial
with levofloxacin as therapy. All patients were older than 17 years,
and for all patients specimens from their infections (specimens
obtained at the time of surgical debridement or an aspirate from
infected bone) were cultured. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or
breast-feeding, severe disease requiring concomitant antimicrobial
therapy, hypersensitivity to any quinolone, resistance of the isolated
pathogen to the study drug, or a creatinine clearance rate less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Patients who failed to respond during therapy were clinical failures.
If signs and symptoms were markedly reduced at the end of therapy, the
patient was considered improved but not cured. Resolution of infection
had to include a healed wound without any drainage or swelling.
Patients were monitored for relapsing infection for as long as possible
after the end of treatment. Informed consent was given voluntarily by
each patient, and the studies were approved by the University of
Kentucky Institutional Review Board.
Table 1 details the responses of the 27 patients with chronic osteomyelitis to therapy. There were 20 men (mean
age, 37 ± 3 years) and 7 women (mean age, 38 ± 7 years).
Quinolone-susceptible organisms were isolated in cultures of specimens
from all of the patients. Fifteen patients were treated with oral
levofloxacin (500 mg every 24 h), seven patients received oral
lomefloxacin dosed at 800 mg every 12 h, which is four times
higher than the approved dose, and five patients received oral
ciprofloxacin (750 mg every 12 h). All patients were evaluable for
the safety of the quinolone, and 24 patients were evaluable for the
efficacy of the quinolone.
0066-4804/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Ciprofloxacin, Lomefloxacin, or Levofloxacin as
Treatment for Chronic Osteomyelitis
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Results of treatment with other
antimicrobial agentsa
Levofloxacin was effective therapy for 9 (60%) of 15 patients. Those who failed to respond included one patient with an allergic reaction (rash and tongue swelling), one patient who failed levofloxacin therapy due to inadequate debridement (dead bone at the site of infection was identified during therapy), three patients who had relapses after the end of therapy due to inadequate debridement (dead bone at the infection site was identified after the completion of therapy), and one patient who had a relapse 5 months after the end of therapy. The infections in patients who were cured were caused by the following organisms: Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 4), anaerobes (n = 4), other staphylococci (n = 3), streptococci (n = 2), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2). The one failure not associated with a lack of debridement involved Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Monitoring of cured patients ranged from 3 to 24 months, with a median of 12 months.
High-dose lomefloxacin was effective therapy for five (71%) of seven patients. Those who were not cured included one patient who stopped lomefloxacin after 1 day of therapy because of nausea and dizziness and one patient who was improving but whose therapy was changed because of Clostridium difficile diarrheal disease. Cured infections included those due to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5) and S. aureus (n = 2). Monitoring of cured patients ranged from 0 to 17 months, with a median of 8 months. Photosensitivity occurred in one patient who elected to take precautions and continue the lomefloxacin treatment, and photophobia and dyspepsia were reported by another patient, who elected to continue the lomefloxacin treatment.
Ciprofloxacin was effective in two of five patients who were monitored for 14 to 36 months after treatment. The infections in the two patients who failed treatment and the one patient who had a relapse were caused by S. aureus. The infections that were cured were caused by S. aureus (n = 1) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 1).
These studies intended to explore the efficacies of quinolones for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis caused by gram-positive bacteria, especially S. aureus. For 11 of 18 patients who had staphylococcal infections and who completed their course of quinolone therapy, the infections were resolved. Seven infections involving gram-positive organisms, including four caused by S. aureus, were cured with levofloxacin. Two infections due to S. aureus were cured with lomefloxacin. One infection due to S. aureus and one infection due to S. epidermidis were cured with ciprofloxacin. All cured patients had adequate debridement of their infected bone and treatment that lasted until their wounds were closed. The treatment durations for patients whose infections were cured ranged from 28 to 110 days, with a mean of 57 ± 6 days. The durations of treatment for patients who failed treatment or who had relapses were also long (38 to 98 days, with a mean of 63 ± 8 days). The prolonged duration of therapy along with adequate debridement may have been important factors in achieving cures in patients with infections caused by gram-positive organisms (4). Oral quinolone therapy is easier for patients than the traditional parenteral antibiotic treatment for S. aureus osteomyelitis and may offer an option for some patients in whom a quinolone-susceptible gram-positive organism is causing their osteomyelitis (4). The combination of a quinolone with other oral agents active against gram-positive pathogens, such as clindamycin and/or rifampin, offers a reasonable option for use in future studies in an effort to further improve cure rates for chronic osteomyelitis caused by gram-positive pathogens (4).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: MN-668A, Division of Infectious Diseases, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0084. Phone: (606) 323-6327. Fax: (606) 323-1020. E-mail: RNGREE01{at}POP.UKY.EDU.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Greenberg, R. N.,
D. J. Kennedy,
P. M. Reilly,
K. Luppen,
W. J. Weinandt,
M. R. Bollinger,
F. Aguirre,
F. Kodesch, and A. M. K. Saeed.
1987.
Treatment of bone, joint, and soft-tissue infections with oral ciprofloxacin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:151-155 |
| 2. | Greenberg, R. N., A. D. Tice, P. K. Marsh, P. C. Craven, P. M. Reilly, M. Bollinger, and W. J. Weinandt. 1987. Randomized trial of ciprofloxacin compared with other antimicrobial therapy in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Am. J. Med. 82(Suppl. 4A):266-269[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Greenberg, R. N., K. M. Wilson, and P. A. Brusca. 1989. Brief report: intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin treatment of 52 infections. Am. J. Med. 87(Suppl. 5A):238S-239S[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Rissing, J. P. 1997. Antimicrobial therapy for chronic osteomyelitis in adults: role of the quinolones. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:1327-1333[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»