Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2000, p. 30-38, Vol. 44, No. 1
0066-4804/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Efficacies of Topical Formulations of Foscarnet and Acyclovir
and of 5-Percent Acyclovir Ointment (Zovirax) in a Murine Model
of Cutaneous Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection
Jocelyne
Piret,1
André
Désormeaux,1
Pierrette
Gourde,1
Julianna
Juhász,2 and
Michel G.
Bergeron1,*
Centre de Recherche en
Infectiologie1 and Faculté de
Pharmacie,2 Université Laval,
Québec, Québec, Canada
Received 11 May 1999/Returned for modification 20 July
1999/Accepted 11 October 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The topical efficacies of foscarnet and acyclovir incorporated into
a polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene polymer were evaluated and compared
to that of 5% acyclovir ointment (Zovirax) by use of a murine
model of cutaneous herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. All three treatments given three times daily for 4 days and
initiated 24 h after infection prevented the development of the
zosteriform rash in mice. The acyclovir formulation and the acyclovir
ointment reduced the virus titers below detectable levels in skin
samples from the majority of mice, whereas the foscarnet formulation
has less of an antiviral effect. Reducing the number of treatments to a
single application given 24 h postinfection resulted in a significantly higher efficacy of the formulation of acyclovir than of
the acyclovir ointment. Acyclovir incorporated within the polymer was
also significantly more effective than the acyclovir ointment when
treatment was initiated on day 5 postinfection. The higher efficacy of
the acyclovir formulation than of the acyclovir ointment is attributed
to the semiviscous character of the polymer, which allows better
penetration of the drug into the skin.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV type 2 (HSV-2) have the ability to become latent in
sensory ganglia and to induce recurrent infections following
reactivation (23). The frequencies of recurrent herpetic
infections in the U.S. population are estimated to be 50 to 70% for
HSV-1 and 23% for HSV-2 (36). Mucosal or skin surfaces are
the usual sites of primary infection. Recurrent herpes labialis and
herpes genitalis represent the most common clinical manifestations
associated with HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections, respectively. Most
recurrences are asymptomatic infections, and the shedding of
herpesvirus under these conditions represents the most common
form of transmission of this disease. Recurrences are associated
with physical or emotional stress, fever, exposure to UV light, tissue
damage, and immune suppression. The frequency of recurrences has also
been correlated with the severity and duration of the initial infection
(36). Although herpes is usually a mild disease in
immunocompetent individuals, mucocutaneous herpetic infections are
troublesome, especially for patients with frequent episodes. Moreover,
immunocompromised patients have an increased risk of developing severe
and more frequent herpetic infections.
During the past several decades, acyclovir has been the drug of choice
for the treatment of herpetic infections. However, the emergence of
acyclovir-resistant HSV isolates has been reported for
immunocompromised patients (9) as well as for organ and bone
marrow recipients (16, 33). Recurrent acyclovir-resistant genital herpes has also been described for an immunocompetent host
(13). Foscarnet (trisodium phosphonoformate) has a broad antiviral spectrum and in vitro activity against all human viruses of
the herpesvirus family, including cytomegalovirus, HSV, and varicella-zoster virus (5, 20). This drug is also effective against acyclovir-resistant HSV and varicella-zoster virus (4, 10,
25-27). Moreover, acyclovir-resistant HSV strains that become resistant to foscarnet may once again be susceptible to acyclovir (28). Because the intravenous administration of foscarnet is limited by the occurrence of nephrotoxic reactions, the development of
topical formulations represents an attractive approach for the
treatment of mucocutaneous herpetic infections, especially for those
caused by acyclovir-resistant strains.
Topical formulations currently available for the treatment of
mucocutaneous herpetic infections include 5% acyclovir ointment (Zovirax) and penciclovir cream formulation (Vectavir cold sore cream
or Denavir cream in the United States). The currently available treatment, either topical or systemic, has only limited efficacy, particularly against symptomatic recurrent herpes. Treatment of recurrent herpes with topical acyclovir demonstrated no or only limited
clinical benefit (6, 18, 22, 30). Wallin et al. demonstrated
a limited but significant effect of topical foscarnet cream on time to
healing for recurrent genital herpes (34). Conversely, no
significant improvements in time to healing or loss of symptoms were
observed for recurrent genital herpes in two other clinical trials
(2, 24). Patients who received treatment in the prevesicular
stage had a slightly reduced number of days with lesions
(14). Treatment of herpes labialis in immunocompetent patients with penciclovir cream was reported beneficial for treatment started in the prodrome and erythema stages as well as in the papule
and vesicle lesion stages (32).
In this study, we used a polymer composed of polyoxypropylene and
polyoxyethylene as a new vehicle for acyclovir and foscarnet to
evaluate if the semiviscous character of this galenic form could allow
efficient drug penetration into the skin, thereby increasing the
efficacies of these drugs against HSV-1 cutaneous lesions in mice. The
topical efficacies of acyclovir and foscarnet incorporated into the
polymer matrix were also compared with that of the commercially
available 5% acyclovir ointment.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Drugs.
Acyclovir (9-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]guanine) and
foscarnet (trisodium phosphonoformate) were obtained from Sigma
Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). [14C]foscarnet and
[3H]acyclovir were obtained from Moravek (Brea, Calif.).
The commercially available 5% acyclovir ointment was obtained from our
local hospital pharmacy.
Preparation of the topical formulations.
For the
formulations of acyclovir and foscarnet, we used a polymer (gel)
composed of polyoxypropylene and polyoxyethylene suspended in phosphate
buffer (200 mM, pH 6.0) at a concentration of 18% (wt/wt). We selected
a pH of 6.0 to correspond with the pH of the skin. For the formulation
of foscarnet, the drug was first dissolved in phosphate buffer (200 mM,
pH 6.0) at a concentration of 6 or 1% (wt/wt). The pH of the solution
was then readjusted to 6.0 by adding a small amount of 1 N HCl. The
solution was then mixed under agitation at 4°C with an equal volume
of the polymer solution prepared in the same buffer to obtain a final
foscarnet concentration of 3 or 0.5% (wt/wt). For the formulation of
acyclovir, the antiviral agent was first dissolved in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) and then mixed at 4°C with the polymer powder and
phosphate buffer (200 mM, pH 6.0) to obtain a final drug concentration
of 5, 3, or 1% (wt/wt). The pH of the formulation of acyclovir was then readjusted to 6.0. The final amount of DMSO present in the formulation was 12.5%.
Virus strain.
HSV-1 strain F (American Type Culture
Collection, Manassas, Va.) was propagated in Vero (African green monkey
kidney) cells (American Type Culture Collection) in Eagle's minimum
essential medium (Canadian Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario,
Canada) supplemented with 0.22% sodium bicarbonate, 100 U of
penicillin-streptomycin per ml, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 2%
fetal bovine serum (EMEM + 2% FBS) to obtain a viral inoculum of
1.5 × 106 PFU/ml.
Plaque reduction assay.
Vero cells seeded in 24-well plates
(Costar, Montréal, Québec, Canada) were infected with
approximately 100 PFU of HSV-1 strain F in 0.5 ml of EMEM + 2%
FBS for 2 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cell
sheets were washed twice with fresh culture medium, overlaid with 0.5 ml of 0.6% SeaPlaque agarose (Marine Colloids, Rockland, Maine) in
EMEM + 2% FBS containing increasing amounts of the drug under
study, and incubated for 2 days at 37°C. Cells were then fixed with
10% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 20 min, washed with
deionized water, and stained with 0.05% methylene blue.
Animal model.
Female hairless mice (SKH1; 5 to 7 weeks old;
Charles River Breeding Laboratories Inc., St. Constant, Québec,
Canada) were used throughout this study. Mice were anesthetized by
intraperitoneal injection of a mixture containing 70 mg of ketamine
hydrochloride (Rogar/STB Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada)
and 11.5 mg of xylazine (Miles Canada Inc., Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada)
per kg of body weight. The virus was inoculated on the lateral side of
the body in the left lumbar skin area. The skin was scratched six times in a crossed-hatch pattern with a 27-gauge needle held vertically. A
viral suspension (5 × 105 PFU/50 µl) was rubbed for
10 to 15 s on the scarified skin area with a cotton-tipped
applicator saturated with EMEM + 2% FBS. The scarified area was
protected with a corn cushion (Schering-Plough Canada Inc.,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), which was held on the mouse body with
surgical tape. The porous inner wall of the aperture of the corn
cushion was made impermeable with tissue adhesive (Vet-bond, St. Paul,
Minn.) prior to use to prevent drug absorption by the patch, which
could act as a reservoir due to the accumulation of drug formulations.
The aperture of the corn cushion was also closed with surgical tape.
Mice were then returned to their cages and observed twice daily.
Treatments.
Different treatment regimens were evaluated in
this study. For treatments initiated 24 h after infection (i.e.,
prior to the appearance of the zosteriform rash), the surgical tape
closing the aperture of the corn cushion was removed and the scarified area was cleaned with a cotton-tipped applicator saturated with cold
water to remove gel or ointment remaining from the last application. Fifteen microliters of the polymer alone, of the polymer containing foscarnet or acyclovir or a similar amount of acyclovir ointment was
applied to the scarified area. The aperture of the corn cushion was
closed with surgical tape to avoid systemic administration that could
result from licking and grooming. For treatments initiated 5 days after
infection (i.e., at the onset of the zosteriform rash), the corn
cushion was removed. The entire zosteriform lesion was treated with 50 µl of the foscarnet or acyclovir formulation or a similar amount of
acyclovir ointment. The treated area was protected with adhesive tape
(Tegaderm; 3M Canada, London, Ontario, Canada) to prevent accidental
systemic treatment that could occur due to licking of drug on the
treated lesion. The treated area was cleaned with a cotton-tipped
applicator saturated with cold water to remove gel or ointment
remaining from the last application. Three daily treatments were given
at 8:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., and 9:00 p.m., as these times represent
convenient times for self-application by patients. Seven to 13 animals
per group were used for all experiments. The efficacies of the
different treatments were evaluated by use of lesion scores, survival
rates, and viral titers in skin samples. No blind evaluations between
treatment groups were undertaken in this study.
Determination of viral titers in skin samples.
The extent of
inhibition of HSV-1 replication in skin samples of mice was determined
5 days after virus inoculation. Preliminary experiments showed that
viral titers in skin samples were maximum on days 4 and 5 postinfection. In brief, mice were sacrificed, and the site of virus
inoculation and the lower flank (a skin area located between the virus
inoculation site and the ventral midline but not touching the
inoculation site) were excised. Skin samples were maintained in Hank's
balanced salt solution (Canadian Life Technologies) at 4°C, blotted,
weighed, and diluted with 1 ml of EMEM + 2% FBS. Viruses were
released from skin samples by three cycles of sonication for 10 s
each with a 5-s interval. The suspension obtained was centrifuged
(1,100 × g for 15 min at 4°C). The supernatant was
collected and stored at
80°C until use. Titration of viruses in
skin samples was done by determining PFU on Vero cells in cultures. We
used a method essentially similar to that described for the plaque
reduction assay, except that infection of cells with viruses extracted
from skin samples was done by centrifuging the plates (750 × g for 45 min at 20°C).
In vivo skin penetration studies.
Mice were infected
cutaneously with HSV-1 in order to obtain a fully developed zosteriform
rash. On day 5 postinfection, a corn cushion was placed on the
inoculation site of infected mice. A corn cushion was also placed on
the left lumbar skin area of control uninfected mice. Fifteen
microliters of 3% foscarnet or 5% acyclovir, incorporated in a
solution or in the polymer matrix, each containing 1.8 µCi of the
corresponding radiolabeled antiviral agent, was deposited into the
aperture of the corn cushion as described above. Twenty-four hours
following treatment, mice were sacrificed, and blood was withdrawn into
heparinized tubes and centrifuged (10,000 × g for 3 min at 4°C) to separate plasma. Patches were removed carefully, and
the test area was cleaned with a humidified cotton-tipped applicator
and then dried with sterile gauze to remove formulations or ointment
remaining from the application. The test area was tape stripped 15 times with approximately 1 cm of adhesive tape (Transpore Surgical
Tape; 3M, St. Paul, Minn.) to remove the stratum corneum. Afterward, the skin was excised (approximately 2 cm2), and the
epidermis and dermis were separated by heat splitting at 60°C in a
water bath. Tissues were treated with tissue solubilizer (BTS-450;
Beckman Instruments Inc., Irvine, Calif.), decolorized with hydrogen
peroxide, and neutralized with glacial acetic acid. The radioactivity
associated with plasma and each tissue sample was determined with a
liquid scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments Inc., Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada).
Statistical analysis.
The areas under the curve (AUC) of the
mean lesion scores for the different treatment groups between days 4 and 10 were compared by use of a one-way analysis of variance, followed
as appropriate by a t test with Fisher's corrections for
multiple simultaneous comparisons. The significance of the differences
in the mortality rates between infected control and drug-treated groups
was evaluated by use of a chi-square test. The significance of the
differences in the viral titers between infected control and
drug-treated groups was analyzed by use of a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U
test. The significance of differences between concentrations of
acyclovir and foscarnet in stratum corneum tape strips was evaluated by comparing the AUC by use of an unpaired t test. The
significance of differences between the levels of accumulation of
acyclovir and foscarnet in the epidermis, the dermis, and plasma was
determined by use of an unpaired t test. All statistical
analyses were performed with a computer package (Statview+SE Software;
Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, Calif.). A P value of less than
0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Effective doses.
HSV-1 strain F is susceptible to both
acyclovir and foscarnet when tested in Vero cells by a plaque reduction
assay. The 50%, 90%, and 99% effective doses for acyclovir were
0.21, 0.38, and 0.42 µg/ml, whereas the corresponding values for
foscarnet were 21.96, 41.55, and 45.95 µg/ml. This strain was
approximately 100-fold less susceptible to foscarnet than to acyclovir.
Efficacy of treatments given three times daily for 4 days at
24 h postinfection.
Figure 1A
shows the time evolution of mean lesion scores for untreated infected
mice and for infected mice treated with the polymer alone, with the
polymer containing 3% foscarnet or 5% acyclovir, or with the
acyclovir ointment. The evaluation of the lesion score was performed
according to the criteria presented in Table
1. In untreated infected mice, no
pathological signs of cutaneous infection were visible during the first
4 days following infection, and only the scarified area remained
apparent. On day 5, herpetic skin lesions began to appear on some mice
in the form of small vesicles distant from the inoculation site. On day
6, almost all untreated infected mice developed herpetic skin lesions in the form of a 4- to 5-mm-wide band extending from the spine to the
ventral midline of the infected dermatome, similar to zoster-like infections. A maximal mean lesion score was observed on day 8. The mean
lesion score decreased thereafter from day 12 to day 15 because of
spontaneous regression of cutaneous lesions in some mice. For mice
treated with the polymer alone, we observed a pattern largely similar
to that for untreated infected mice, suggesting that the polymer alone
had no therapeutic effect on the development of lesions. However,
infected mice treated with all three drug formulations showed a
significant reduction of the mean lesion score compared to untreated
infected mice and mice treated with the polymer alone (Table
2). The decrease in the mean lesion score
was less pronounced in mice receiving the polymer containing 0.5%
foscarnet (data not shown). Acyclovir incorporated into the polymer at
concentrations of 1, 3, and 5% demonstrated a dose-dependent effect in
reducing the mean lesion score of infected mice, but the differences
between doses were not significant (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Time evolution of the mean lesion score and survival of
hairless mice infected cutaneously with HSV-1 strain F and treated soon
after infection with the polymer alone ( ), the polymer containing
3% foscarnet ( ), the polymer containing 5% acyclovir ( ), or the
acyclovir ointment ( ). Untreated infected mice ( ) were used as
controls. Treatment was started 24 h after the infection and was
repeated three times daily for 4 days. Values represent the means for 7 to 10 animals per group.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Effects of topical treatment given with various schedules
of administration on the development of herpetic cutaneous lesions
in infected mice
|
|
Figure
1B shows the corresponding survival rates of the animal groups
mentioned above. Fifty percent of untreated infected
mice died from
encephalitis between day 7 and day 10. In mice
receiving the polymer
alone, the lethality of infection was 60%,
suggesting once again that
the polymer alone had no therapeutic
effect against the infection. On
the other hand, all mice treated
with the polymer containing 3%
foscarnet or 5% acyclovir or with
the acyclovir ointment survived the
infection. In mice treated
with a formulation containing 0.5%
foscarnet, the survival rate
was 90% (
P, <0.001), whereas
the survival rates of mice treated
with topical formulations containing
1 and 3% acyclovir were 90%
(
P, <0.05) and 100%
(
P, < 0.001), respectively (data not
shown).
Figure
2 shows viral titers measured in
skin samples corresponding to the inoculation site (Fig.
2A) and to the
lower flank
(Fig.
2B) on day 5 postinfection. The polymer alone could
not
significantly reduce the virus content either at the site of
inoculation
or in the lower flank. Treatment with the polymer
containing 3%
foscarnet resulted in a significant decrease in the
virus content
in skin samples. This decrease was more pronounced at the
inoculation
site than in the lower flank. Of prime interest, acyclovir
incorporated
into the polymer and acyclovir ointment caused a marked
and significant
reduction (often below the limit of detection of the
assay) of
the viral titers both at the inoculation site and in the
lower
flank.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of formulations on titers of HSV-1 in the skin of
hairless mice. Treatment was started 24 h after the infection and
was repeated three times daily for 4 days. Viral titers in skin samples
corresponding to the inoculation site (A) and to the lower flank (B)
were determined on day 5 postinfection. Broken lines show the limit of
detection of the assay. PFA, foscarnet; ACV, acyclovir. Values
represent the means ± standard errors of the means for 7 to 10 animals per group. P values were <0.05 (*), <0.005
(**), and <0.001 (***).
|
|
Effect of reducing the number of treatments.
Figure
3A shows the time evolution of the mean
lesion scores for untreated infected mice and for infected mice treated
with a single application of polymer containing 3% foscarnet or 5% acyclovir or with the acyclovir ointment given at 24 h
postinfection. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that the polymer
alone did not exert any effect on the development of herpetic cutaneous lesions in this treatment regimen (data not shown). For mice treated with the formulation containing 3% foscarnet, the evolution of the
mean lesion score was similar to that observed for untreated infected
mice. Of prime interest, the topical formulation containing 5%
acyclovir reduced significantly the development of cutaneous lesions
compared to the results for untreated infected mice and mice treated
with the acyclovir ointment (Table 2), which exerted only a modest
effect. The formulation containing 3% foscarnet given only once
delayed mortality but could not increase the survival rate compared to
that of untreated infected mice (Fig. 3B). However, 5% acyclovir
incorporated into the polymer significantly reduced the lethality of
the infection (P, <0.001), but the acyclovir ointment did
not. On the other hand, viral titers determined at the inoculation site
and in the lower flank of mice treated with a single application of the
polymer alone, polymer containing 3% foscarnet or 5% acyclovir or
with 5% acyclovir ointment on day 5 postinfection were not markedly
decreased compared to those in untreated infected mice (data not
shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Time evolution of the mean lesion score and survival of
hairless mice infected cutaneously with HSV-1 strain F and treated
24 h postinfection with a single application of the polymer
containing 3% foscarnet ( ), the polymer containing 5% acyclovir
( ), or the acyclovir ointment ( ). Untreated infected mice ( )
were used as controls. Values represent the means for 7 to 13 animals
per group.
|
|
The topical efficacies of the different treatments were also evaluated
after daily treatment for 4 days starting at 24 h postinfection.
No major differences in efficacy could be seen between the polymer
formulations containing 5% acyclovir or 3% foscarnet and the
acyclovir
ointment (data not shown). In addition, all topical
treatments
used in this regimen significantly increased survival rates
(
P,
<0.05).
Effect of delaying the treatments.
Figure
4 shows the time evolution of the mean
lesion score (Fig. 4A) and survival (Fig. 4B) for untreated infected
mice and for infected mice treated three times daily for 4 days
starting on day 5 postinfection with the polymer alone, with the
polymer containing 3% foscarnet or 5% acyclovir, or with the
acyclovir ointment. The results showed that treatment with the polymer
alone, with the polymer containing 3% foscarnet, or with the acyclovir ointment exerted a modest but not significant effect compared to the
results obtained for untreated infected mice. In contrast, a
significant reduction of the mean lesion score was observed for mice
treated with the polymer containing 5% acyclovir compared to untreated
infected mice and mice treated with the polymer alone or the acyclovir
ointment (Table 2). Treatment with the 3% foscarnet formulation or
with the acyclovir ointment significantly increased the survival rates
of infected mice (P, <0.05). Of prime interest, all mice
treated with the polymer containing 5% acyclovir survived the
infection (P, <0.001).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Time evolution of the mean lesion score and survival of
hairless mice infected cutaneously with HSV-1 strain F and treated
later after infection with the polymer alone ( ), the polymer
containing 3% foscarnet ( ), the polymer containing 5% acyclovir
( ), or the acyclovir ointment ( ). Untreated infected mice ( )
were used as controls. Treatment was started on day 5 postinfection and
was repeated three times daily for 4 days. Values represent the means
for 7 to 10 animals per group.
|
|
In vivo skin penetration of antiviral agents.
Figure
5 shows the distributions of foscarnet
and acyclovir in skin tissues of uninfected (Fig. 5A, C, and E) and
infected (Fig. 5B, D, and F) mice at 24 h after topical
application either in phosphate buffer or in the polymer matrix to
determine whether the polymer could increase the penetration of
antivirals into the skin. The distributions of both formulations of
foscarnet and of the buffered solution of acyclovir in the stratum
corneum tape strips of uninfected and infected mice were similar. In
contrast, the incorporation of acyclovir into the polymer matrix
markedly increased the amount of drug recovered in the stratum
corneum of both uninfected (P, <0.05) and infected
(P, <0.005) mice, the increased drug penetration
being more pronounced in infected mice. No or negligible amounts of
foscarnet were found in the underlying epidermis and dermis of
uninfected mice irrespective of the carrier used for the drug
application. The concentrations of foscarnet in the epidermis and
dermis of infected mice were higher when the drug was incorporated into
the polymer, but a high variability between mice was observed. The
concentrations of acyclovir were higher than those of foscarnet in the
epidermis and dermis of both uninfected and infected mice irrespective
of the carrier used. The concentrations of acyclovir incorporated
into the polymer were 6.1- and 3.3-fold higher than that of the drug in
the buffered solution in the epidermis of uninfected and infected mice,
respectively. The concentrations of acyclovir administered in the
polymer matrix were 3.9- and 4.1-fold higher than that of the drug in
the buffered solution in the dermis of uninfected and infected
mice, respectively. Infection of mice did not significantly increase
the amount of acyclovir in the epidermis or in the dermis.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Distribution of foscarnet ( and ) and acyclovir
( and ) in skin tissues of uninfected (A, C, and E) and infected
(B, D, and F) mice at 24 h after topical application either in
phosphate buffer (open symbols) or in the polymer matrix (filled
symbols). (A and B) Distributions of foscarnet and acyclovir in the
stratum corneum tape strips. (C and D) Concentrations of foscarnet and
acyclovir in the epidermis. (E and F) Concentrations of foscarnet and
acyclovir in the dermis. Values represent the means for four to six
animals per group. Error bars show standard errors of the means.
P values were <0.05 (*) and <0.001 (***).
|
|
Figure
6 shows the concentration of
acyclovir in the plasma of uninfected and infected mice at 24 h
after topical application
either in phosphate buffer or in the polymer
matrix. Similar concentrations
of acyclovir were found in the plasma of
uninfected mice for both
formulations. The concentration of acyclovir
in the plasma of
infected mice was 2.3-fold higher when the drug was
incorporated
into the polymer matrix than when it was present in the
buffered
solution. Infection of mice resulted in a fourfold increase in
the concentration in plasma of acyclovir administered within the
polymer matrix. No or negligible amounts of foscarnet were recovered
in
the plasma of uninfected or infected mice, respectively (data
not
shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Concentration of acyclovir in plasma of uninfected and
infected mice at 24 h after topical application either in
phosphate buffer (open bars) or in the polymer matrix (filled bars).
Values represent the means for four to six animals per group. Error
bars show standard errors of the means. The P value was
<0.001 (***).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we have evaluated the efficacies of
foscarnet and acyclovir incorporated within a polymer matrix in comparison with that of acyclovir ointment in a murine model of cutaneous HSV-1 infection. The zosteriform model, even though it
involves only the primary infection, provides a useful analog of
recurrent disease (3). In this model, the virus is
inoculated in the skin, where the primary infection occurs. From this
site, the virus spreads, probably by retrograde axonal flow, to sensory ganglia and the central nervous system. Thereafter, the virus reaches
axons that innervate skin within the same dermatome as the inoculation
site, spreads via orthograde flow to the skin, and produces herpetic
lesions within the affected dermatome. In our model, viral titers
measured 24 h postinfection at the inoculation site of untreated
infected mice were below the detectable level (data not shown),
suggesting that the virus was disseminated to sensory ganglia.
Thereafter, the virus returned to the skin and was again detectable at
the inoculation site on day 2 postinfection. Ijichi et al.
(11) also reported that viral titers measured at the
inoculation site gradually decreased and were undetectable 12 h
after infection, whereas high viral titers were recovered 24 h
postinfection. Viral titers determined both at the inoculation site and
in the lower flank reached a maximum value on day 5 postinoculation and
then rapidly decreased on day 7. Virus clearance in cutaneous HSV
infections is mediated by the host immune system and is essentially a
property of CD4+ T cells (19). In spite of the
complete clearance of the virus by day 7, severe ulcerations continued
from day 6 to day 12 and might have been partly due to nonspecific
cellular immune responses of infected mice (29). If adequate
virus clearance does not occur, the virus spreads into the central
nervous system, and mice develop encephalitis and ultimately die. Viral
titers were detectable in the brains of some mice as soon as day 6 postinfection (data not shown), and mice began to die at about day 7.
All treatments given three times daily for 4 days and initiated 24 h postinfection demonstrated a marked therapeutic effect on the
development of herpetic cutaneous infections, on the basis of mean
lesion scores. The formulation of acyclovir within the polymer matrix
and the acyclovir ointment reduced viral titers in skin samples below
detectable levels, whereas the formulation of foscarnet within the
polymer matrix exerted less of an effect on this parameter. Because in
our model, virus returns to the skin between 24 and 48 h after
inoculation, the marked therapeutic effect observed with all topical
treatments given 24 h postinfection should correspond to an inhibition
of secondary virus dissemination. This type of treatment could thus
mimic the situation in which a patient initiates therapy at the onset
of the prodrome phase. Reducing the treatment to a single application
of topical formulations given 24 h after the infection resulted in
a significantly higher efficacy of acyclovir incorporated within the
polymer matrix than of the acyclovir ointment.
A delay in the initiation of topical treatments to 5 days postinfection
was characterized by an increase in the mean lesion score and an
increase in the mortality of infected mice treated with the formulation
of foscarnet and with the acyclovir ointment given three times daily
for 4 days. Many authors suggest that the observed lack of efficacy of
topical treatments in delayed therapy could be due to the fact that the
phase of virus replication in the zosteriform model occurs before the
appearance of symptoms and the initiation of treatment. Kristofferson
et al. reported that topical treatments with foscarnet initiated 12, 24, and 48, or 72 h after infection were markedly
effective, moderately effective, and ineffective, respectively
(14). Lee et al. (15) also showed that the
topical efficacy of acyclovir in 1- and 2-day-delayed treatments was
essentially the same as that for treatment started immediately after
infection, while the topical efficacy of a 3-day-delayed treatment was
much lower. Ijichi et al. (11) also showed reduced effects
of late therapy with
1-
-D-arabinofuranosyl-E-5-(2-bromovinyl)uracil cream. Furthermore, as previously mentioned, a lack of therapeutic effect on disease development was reported when treatment was initiated
on the appearance of the first clinical signs of infection in clinical
trials. Interestingly, the results clearly showed that the application
of acyclovir incorporated within the polymer on day 5 postinfection was
significantly more efficacious than the acyclovir ointment, as
evidenced by the reduced mean lesion scores. At this time, the
zosteriform rash has started to develop and large amounts of virus have
reached the skin. This type of treatment could thus mimic the situation
in which a patient initiates therapy at the appearance of lesions. We
could not, however, determine viral titers in skin samples of treated
animals because untreated infected mice began to die at about day 7 or
8 postinfection. In addition, in untreated infected mice that survived
the infection, virus tended to disappear from the skin after day 7, making the interpretation of results difficult (data not shown).
An important consideration in the treatment of herpetic mucocutaneous
infections is the delivery of adequate amounts of drugs at the site(s)
of infection (31). It is well known that DMSO, at a
concentration of higher than 70%, has the ability to accelerate the
skin penetration of a variety of substances mainly because it elutes
components of the stratum corneum, delaminates the horny layer, and
denatures proteins (35). However, the small amount of DMSO
(12.5%) in the formulation of acyclovir could not explain its better
efficacy. Skin penetration studies revealed that the concentrations of
acyclovir recovered in different parts of the skin (stratum corneum,
epidermis, and dermis) were significantly higher when the drug was
administered in the polymer matrix than when it was administered in a
buffered solution. We thus proposed that the incorporation of acyclovir
into the polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene polymer could lead to a
better targeting of sites of viral replication, most probably because
of the semiviscous character of this galenic form, which could allow
efficient drug penetration into the smallest irregularities of the
skin. In infected mice, the presence of crusts due to the scarification
and to the zosteriform rash resulted in a significantly higher
concentration of acyclovir in the stratum corneum compared to
uninfected mice. In addition, we observed an increase in the systemic
concentration of acyclovir, which could treat encephalitis or a
disseminated disease and might therefore explain the difference in
mortality observed with the polymer formulation.
We previously showed that the incorporation of foscarnet into the
polymer matrix markedly increased its efficacy over that of the drug
contained in a buffered solution (21). However, the efficacy
of the formulation of foscarnet was lower than that of acyclovir,
irrespective of the schedules of administration tested. This result can
be attributed to its high anionic character, which limits its
intracellular penetration and thereby limits its efficacy compared to
that of acyclovir, which is neutral at a physiological pH
(8). In that respect, studies performed in our laboratory
with Franz diffusion cells and a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (pore
size, 5 µm), which mimics the hydrophobic property of human skin
(12, 37), have indicated that acyclovir incorporated within
the polymer diffuses at least 30 times more efficiently than foscarnet
through such a membrane (data not shown). This result suggests that
differences in interactions between the polymer matrix and these two
antiviral agents could markedly influence their penetration into the
skin. Skin penetration studies indeed revealed that the concentrations
of foscarnet in the different skin layers as well as in the plasma were
lower than those of acyclovir irrespective of the carrier used for drug
administration. Moreover, the difference in the sensitivities of HSV-1
strain F to both drugs may also contribute to the better efficacy of the formulation of acyclovir. Descamps et al. reported a similar ranking for the topical efficacies of these two drugs given as a 1%
water-soluble ointment against cutaneous HSV-1 infections in mice
(7). Conversely, Alenius et al. showed that acyclovir, both
in DMSO and in propylene glycol, is consistently less active than a
foscarnet cream when tested on HSV-1 cutaneous lesions in guinea pigs
(1).
In conclusion, our results showed that a polymer composed of
polyoxypropylene and polyoxyethylene could represent a suitable vehicle
for antiviral agents for topical treatments of herpetic cutaneous
lesions. Such an approach could also be convenient for the treatment of
genital herpes. Studies should now be undertaken to define the
respective roles of topical efficacy, which takes place in basal skin
or mucosal layers, and systemic efficacy in treating herpetic lesions
either prior to or at the time of the appearance of symptoms.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported by a grant from Infectio Recherche Inc.
We thank Rabeea F. Omar and Guy Boivin for constructive comments and
helpful discussions. We also thank Hélène Cormier for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: Centre de
Recherche en Infectiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de
Québec, Pavillon CHUL, 2705 Blvd. Laurier, Sainte-Foy,
Québec, Canada G1V 4G2. Phone: (418) 654-2705. Fax: (418)
654-2715. E-mail:
Michel.G.Bergeron{at}crchul.ulaval.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alenius, S.,
M. Berg,
F. Froberg,
K. Eklind,
B. Lindborg, and B. Öberg.
1982.
Therapeutic effects of foscarnet sodium and acyclovir on cutaneous infections due to herpes simplex virus type 1 in guinea pigs.
J. Infect. Dis.
146:569-573[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barton, S. E.,
P. E. Munday,
G. R. Kinghorn,
W. I. van der Meijden,
E. Stolz,
A. Notowicz,
S. Rashid,
J. L. Schuller,
A. J. Essex-Cater,
M. H. M. Kuijpers, and A. C. Chanas.
1986.
Topical treatment of recurrent genital herpes simplex virus infections with trisodium phosphonoformate (foscarnet): double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study.
Genitourin. Med.
62:247-250[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Blyth, W. A.,
D. A. Harbour, and T. J. Hill.
1984.
Pathogenesis of zosteriform spread of herpes simplex virus in the mouse.
J. Gen. Virol.
65:1477-1486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chatis, P. A.,
C. H. Miller,
L. E. Schrager, and C. S. Crumpacker.
1989.
Successful treatment with foscarnet of an acyclovir-resistant mucocutaneous infection with herpes simplex virus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
N. Engl. J. Med.
320:297-300[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chrisp, P., and P. Clissold.
1991.
Foscarnet: a review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in immunocompromised patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis.
Drugs
41:104-129[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Corey, L.,
A. J. Nahmias,
M. E. Guinan,
J. K. Benedetti,
C. W. Critchlow, and K. K. Holmes.
1982.
A trial of topical acyclovir in genital herpes simplex virus infections.
N. Engl. J. Med.
306:1313-1319[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Descamps, J.,
E. De Clercq,
P. J. Barr,
A. S. Jones,
R. T. Walker,
P. F. Torrence, and D. Shugar.
1979.
Relative potenties of different antiherpes agents in the topical treatment of cutaneous herpes simplex virus infection of athymic nude mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
16:680-682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dusserre, N.,
C. Lessard,
N. Paquette,
S. Perron,
L. Poulin,
M. Tremblay,
D. Beauchamp,
A. Désormeaux, and M. G. Bergeron.
1995.
Encapsulation of foscarnet in liposomes modifies drug intracellular accumulation, in vitro anti-HIV-1 activity, tissue distribution, and pharmacokinetics.
AIDS
9:833-841[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Englund, J. A.,
M. E. Zimmerman,
E. M. Swierkosz,
J. L. Goodman,
D. R. Scholl, and H. H. Balfour.
1990.
Herpes simplex virus resistant to acyclovir. A study in a tertiary care center.
Ann. Intern. Med.
112:416-422.
|
| 10.
|
Erlich, K. S.,
M. A. Jacobson,
J. E. Koehler,
S. E. Follansbee,
D. P. Drennan,
L. Gooze,
S. Safrin, and J. Mills.
1989.
Foscarnet therapy for severe acyclovir-resistant herpes virus type-2 infections in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). An uncontrolled trial.
Ann. Intern. Med.
110:710-713.
|
| 11.
|
Ijichi, K.,
N. Ashida,
S. Varia, and H. Machida.
1993.
Topical treatment with BV-araU of immunosuppressed and immunocompetent shaved mice cutaneously infected with herpes simplex virus type 1.
Antiviral Res.
21:47-57[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Juhász, J.,
S. Mahashabde, and J. Sequeira.
1996.
Comparison of in vitro release rates of nitroglycerin by diffusion through a Teflon membrane to the USP method.
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.
22:1139-1144.
|
| 13.
|
Kost, R. G.,
E. L. Hill,
M. Tigges, and S. E. Strauss.
1993.
Brief report: recurrent acyclovir-resistant genital herpes in an immunocompetent patient.
N. Engl. J. Med.
329:1777-1782[Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Kristofferson, A.,
A.-C. Ericson,
A. Sohl-Åkerlund, and R. Datema.
1988.
Limited efficacy of inhibitors of herpes simplex virus DNA synthesis in murine models of recrudescent disease.
J. Gen. Virol.
69:1157-1166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Lee, P. H.,
M. H. Su,
E. R. Kern, and W. I. Higuchi.
1992.
Novel animal model for evaluating topical efficacy of antiviral agents: flux versus efficacy correlations in the acyclovir treatment of cutaneous herpes simplex virus type 1 (HVS-1) infections in hairless mice.
Pharm. Res.
9:979-989[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Ljungman, P.,
M. N. Ellis,
R. C. Hackman,
D. H. Shepp, and J. D. Meyers.
1990.
Acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus causing pneumonia after marrow transplantation.
J. Infect. Dis.
162:244-248[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Lobe, D. C.,
T. Spector, and N. Ellis.
1991.
Synergistic topical therapy by acyclovir and A1110U for herpes simplex virus induced zosteriform rash in mice.
Antiviral Res.
15:87-100[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Luby, J. P.,
J. W. Gnann,
W. J. Alexander,
V. A. Hatcher,
A. E. Friedman-Kien,
R. J. Klein,
H. Keyserling,
A. Nahmias,
J. Mills,
J. Schachter,
J. M. Douglas,
L. Corey, and S. L. Sacks.
1984.
A collaborative study of patient-initiated treatment of recurrent genital herpes with topical acyclovir or placebo.
J. Infect. Dis.
150:1-6[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Manickan, E., and B. T. Rouse.
1995.
Roles of different T-cell subsets in control of herpes simplex virus infection determined by using T-cell-deficient mouse models.
J. Virol.
69:8178-8179[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Öberg, B.
1989.
Antiviral effects of phosphonoformate.
Pharmacol. Ther.
19:387-415.
|
| 21.
|
Piret, J.,
P. Gourde,
H. Cormier,
A. Désormeaux,
D. Beauchamp,
M. J. Tremblay,
J. Juhász, and M. G. Bergeron.
1999.
Efficacy of gel formulations containing free or liposomal foscarnet in a murine model of cutaneous herpes simplex type-1 infection.
J. Liposome Res.
9:181-198.
|
| 22.
|
Reichman, R. C.,
G. J. Badger,
M. E. Guinan,
A. J. Nahmias,
R. E. Keeney,
L. G. Davis,
T. Ashikaga, and R. Dolin.
1983.
Topically administered acyclovir in the treatment of recurrent herpes simplex genitalis: a controlled trial.
J. Infect. Dis.
147:336-340[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Roizman, B., and A. E. Sears.
1990.
Herpes simplex viruses and their replication, p. 1795-1841.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, R. M. Chanock, M. S. Hirsch, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, and B. Roizman (ed.), Fields virology, vol. 1. Raven Press, New York, N.Y
|
| 24.
|
Sacks, S. L.,
J. Portnoy,
D. Lawee,
W. Schlech,
F. Y. Aoki,
D. L. Tyrrell,
M. Poisson,
C. Bright, and J. Kaluski.
1987.
Clinical course of recurrent genital herpes and treatment with foscarnet cream: results of a Canadian multicenter trial.
J. Infect. Dis.
155:178-186[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Safrin, S.,
T. Assaykeen,
S. Follansbee, and J. Mills.
1990.
Foscarnet therapy for acyclovir-resistant mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in 26 AIDS patients: preliminary data.
J. Infect. Dis.
161:1078-1084[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Safrin, S.,
T. G. Berger,
I. Gilson,
P. R. Wolfe,
C. B. Wolfsy,
J. Mills, and K. K. Biron.
1991.
Foscarnet therapy in five patients with AIDS and acyclovir-resistant varicella-zoster virus infection.
Ann. Intern. Med.
115:19-21.
|
| 27.
|
Safrin, S.,
C. Crumpacker,
P. Chatis,
R. Davis,
R. Hafner,
J. Rush,
H. A. Kessler,
B. Landry, and J. Mills.
1991.
A controlled trial comparing foscarnet with vidarabine for acyclovir-resistant mucocutaneous herpes simplex in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group.
N. Engl. J. Med.
325:551-555[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Safrin, S.,
S. Kemmerly,
B. Plotkin,
T. Smith,
N. Weissbach,
D. De Veranez,
L. D. Phan, and D. Cohn.
1994.
Foscarnet-resistant herpes simplex virus infection in patients with AIDS.
J. Infect. Dis.
169:193-196[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Simmons, A., and A. A. Nash.
1984.
Zosteriform spread of herpes simplex virus as a model of recrudescence and its use to investigate the role of immune cells in prevention of recurrent disease.
J. Virol.
52:816-821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Spruance, S. L., and C. S. Crumpacker.
1982.
Topical 5 percent acyclovir in polyethylene glycol for herpes simplex labialis: antiviral effect without clinical benefit.
Am. J. Med.
73:315-319[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Spruance, S. L., and D. J. Freeman.
1990.
Topical treatment of cutaneous herpes simplex virus infections.
Antiviral Res.
14:305-321[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Spruance, S. L.,
T. L. Rea,
C. Thoming,
R. Tucker,
R. Saltzman, and R. Boon.
1997.
Penciclovir cream for the treatment of herpes simplex labialis. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Topical Penciclovir Collaborative Study Group.
JAMA
277:1374-1379[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Verdonck, L. F.,
J. J. Cornelissen,
J. Smit,
J. Lepoutre,
G. C. de Gast,
A. W. Dekker, and M. Rozenberg-Arska.
1993.
Successful foscarnet therapy for acyclovir-resistant mucocutaneous infection with herpes simplex virus in a recipient of allogeneic BMT.
Bone Marrow Transplant.
11:177-179[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Wallin, J.,
J. O. Lemestedt,
S. Ogenstad, and E. Lycke.
1985.
Topical treatment of recurrent genital herpes infections with foscarnet.
Scand. J. Infect. Dis.
17:165-172[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Walters, K. A.
1989.
Penetration enhancers and their use in transdermal therapeutic systems, p. 197-245.
In
J. Hadgraft, and R. H. Guy (ed.), Transdermal drug delivery: developmental issues and research initiatives, vol. 35. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y
|
| 36.
|
Whitley, R. J.
1990.
Herpes simplex viruses, p. 1843-1887.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, R. M. Chanock, M. S. Hirsch, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, and B. Roizman (ed.), Fields virology, vol. 1. Raven Press, New York, N.Y
|
| 37.
|
Wu, S. T.,
G. K. Shiu,
J. E. Simmons,
R. L. Bronaugh, and J. P. Skelly.
1992.
In vitro release of nitroglycerin from topical products by use of artificial membranes.
J. Pharm. Sci.
81:1153-1156[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2000, p. 30-38, Vol. 44, No. 1
0066-4804/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Piret, J., Lamontagne, J., Désormeaux, A., Bergeron, M. G.
(2001). Efficacies of Gel Formulations Containing Foscarnet, Alone or Combined with Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, against Establishment and Reactivation of Latent Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 1030-1036
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Piret, J., Désormeaux, A., Cormier, H., Lamontagne, J., Gourde, P., Juhász, J., Bergeron, M. G.
(2000). Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Increases the Efficacy of a Topical Formulation of Foscarnet against Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Cutaneous Lesions in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44: 2263-2270
[Abstract]
[Full Text]