Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2000, p. 2740-2746, Vol. 44, No. 10
Department of Pathology (Clinical
Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
17033,1 and Department of Pathology
(Clinical Microbiology), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland,
Ohio 441062
Received 11 February 2000/Returned for modification 4 June
2000/Accepted 11 July 2000
Ability of daily sequential subcultures in subinhibitory
concentrations of clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin to
select resistant mutants was studied in 10 pneumococci (ciprofloxacin MICs, 1 to 4 µg/ml, and clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin MICs, 0.06 to
0.125 µg/ml [n = 9]; ciprofloxacin,
clinafloxacin, and trovafloxacin MICs, 32, 0.5, and 2 µg/ml,
respectively [n = 1]). Subculturing was done
50 times, or until MICs increased fourfold or more. Mutants for which
MICs were fourfold (or more) higher than those for parent strains were
selected in five strains by clinafloxacin, in six strains by
trovafloxacin, and nine strains by ciprofloxacin. Sequence analysis of
type II topoisomerase showed that most mutants had mutations in ParC at
Ser79 or Asp83 and in GyrA at Ser81, while a few mutants had mutations
in ParE or GyrB. In the presence of reserpine, the MICs of
ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin for most mutants were lower (four to
eight times lower), but for none of the mutants were trovafloxacin MICs
lower, suggesting an efflux mechanism affecting the first two agents but not trovafloxacin. Single-step mutation rates were also determined for eight strains for which the MICs were as follows: 0.06 µg/ml (clinafloxacin), 0.06 to 0.125 µg/ml (trovafloxacin), and 1 µg/ml (ciprofloxacin). Single-step mutation rates with drugs at the MIC were
2.0×10 Clinafloxacin is a novel
fluoroquinolone with broad-spectrum in vitro activity against
gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic pathogens (8).
This drug is more active in vitro against Streptococcus pneumoniae than ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and most other
fluoroquinolones (8). Newer compounds of this class have
improved activity and pharmacokinetics relative to older quinolones
(3).
Fluoroquinolones present potential for empirical treatment of adult
respiratory infections, in part due to the increase in the incidence of
penicillin-resistant pneumococci and also because of their activity
against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella
catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma
pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila (1,
25). However, the overuse of this class of antimicrobial agent
could lead to the emergence of resistant mutants. There were no
pneumococci resistant to ciprofloxacin in a 1997 U.S. surveillance
study (13), and worldwide incidence of these strains is less
than 1% (13). However resistance to levofloxacin (5.5%) and trovafloxacin (2.2%) was recently reported from Hong Kong (12). In Canada, the prevalence of pneumococci with reduced susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones in adults increased from 0% in
1993 to 1.7% in 1997 and 1998 (5). The prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant pneumococci also increased from 0.9% in 1991-1992 to 3.0% in 1997-1998 in Spain (15). It is a
concern that these resistant strains may spread to other parts of the world.
The primary targets of fluoroquinolones are topoisomerase IV and DNA
gyrase. Topoisomerase IV is composed of ParC and ParE subunits, which
are encoded by parC and parE genes, respectively. DNA gyrase is composed of GyrA and GyrB, which are encoded by gyrA and gyrB genes, respectively. Point
mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of
topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase genes are associated with quinolone
resistance. Topoisomerase IV is the primary target for ciprofloxacin
and trovafloxacin (9, 11, 19, 25), while DNA gyrase and
topoisomerase IV are dual targets of clinafloxacin in S. pneumoniae (20). Mutations in the QRDRs of
parE and gyrB are also believed to play a role in fluoroquinolone resistance (14, 19, 25).
In this study, we determined and compared the effects of clinafloxacin,
trovafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin to select resistant pneumococcal
mutants by (i) multistep resistance selection by exposure to
subinhibitory concentrations of these agents and (ii) single-step
resistance selection. Clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin were chosen as
examples of quinolones with increased activity against S. pneumoniae. The mutations in ParC, GyrA, ParE, and GyrB of the
mutants were determined, and mutant strains were also tested for the
presence of an efflux mechanism by determining MICs in the presence and
absence of reserpine. Furthermore, time-kill experiments of some of
parent and mutant strains were performed to compare the in vitro
activities of three quinolones.
Bacteria and antimicrobial agents.
Nine strains of S. pneumoniae clinically isolated within the past 5 years were
randomly selected from our collection. One strain for which the MIC of
ciprofloxacin was 32 µg/ml was also used; this strain was obtained
from Spain. Organisms were identified by optochin susceptibility and
classified by serotyping. Antimicrobials were obtained as follows:
clinafloxacin from Parke-Davis Pharmaceuticals, Ann Arbor, Mich.;
trovafloxacin from Pfizer, Inc., New York, N.Y.; and ciprofloxacin from
Bayer, Inc., West Haven, Conn.
Susceptibility testing.
MICs were determined by reference
microdilution methodology in Muller-Hinton broth (Difco Laboratories,
Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood
(17). For the purpose of this study, strains were considered
susceptible to ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin when MICs of these drugs
were Multistep resistance selection.
Multistep resistance
selection for each of the quinolones was performed as described
previously (7, 23). Glass tubes containing 1 ml of
caution-adjusted Muller-Hinton broth (Difco) supplemented with 5%
lysed horse blood with doubling antibiotic dilutions were inoculated
with approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml at antibiotic
concentrations from 3 doubling dilutions above to 3 doubling dilutions
below the MIC of each agent for each strain. The initial inoculum was
prepared by suspending growth from overnight Trypticase soy blood agar
plate (Difco) in Muller-Hinton broth. Tubes were incubated at 35°C
for 24 h. Daily passages were performed for 50 days by taking 10 µl of inoculum from the tube with the drug concentration nearest the
MIC (usually the tube 1 doubling dilution below the MIC). Daily
subculturing was done 50 times, or until MICs for mutants increased
fourfold or more. Resistant mutants then were subcultured 10 times on
drug-free medium, and the MICs were determined.
Single-step resistance selection.
The frequency of
spontaneous single-step mutation was determined by spreading cultures
(approximately 1010 CFU/ml) in a 100-µl volume of
phosphate-buffered saline on 10% lysed horse blood. Brain heart
infusion agar (Difco) plates (100-mm diameter) contained each compound
at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 times the MIC (20). Plates were
incubated aerobically at 35°C for 48 to 72 h. The resistance
frequency was calculated as the number of resistant colonies per
inoculum (20). MICs for parent and resistant mutant strains
were determined by an agar dilution method (21, 22). Gene
sequencing and efflux mechanism were determined for some single-step
mutant strains (see below).
Serotyping.
Serotyping of parent and mutant strains was
performed by the standard Quellung method with sera from the Statens
Seruminstitut (Copenhagen, Denmark).
PFGE.
To determine whether resistant isolates obtained at
the end of serial passages were derived from those used at the
beginning of the study, the parent strains and the mutants for which
the MICs were increased that were obtained after the last passage were
tested by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with a CHEF DR III
apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) as previously described (7,
16).
PCR of quinolone resistance determinants and DNA sequence
analysis.
To determine whether mutants that developed resistance
to quinolones had alterations in topoisomerase IV or DNA gyrase
compared to the parent strains, parC, parE,
gyrA, and gyrB were amplified by the PCR method
and sequenced as described previously (7). Mutants with
mutations widely described in the literature (e.g., Ser79 Determination of efflux mechanism.
MICs for parent and
mutant strains were determined in the presence and absence of reserpine
(10 µg/ml; Sigma) as described previously (4, 7). Thirty
quinolone-resistant mutants for which the MICs were at least fourfold
greater than those for their parent strains were tested (4).
An efflux mechanism was believed to be present when the MIC of an agent
in the presence of reserpine was at least fourfold less (2 doubling
dilutions) than the MIC in the absence of reserpine (tests were
repeated three times) (6, 7).
Time-kill methodology.
Time-kill studies were carried out
for three parent strains (strains 1, 6, and 7) and three multistep
mutant strains selected by each quinolone using Mueller-Hinton broth
with 5% lysed horse blood as described previously (21, 22).
Multistep resistance selection by subculturing in subinhibitory
concentrations.
For initial quinolone MICs for parent strains,
there were nine strains for which the ciprofloxacin MICs were 1 to 4 µg/ml and the trovafloxacin and clinafloxacin MICs were 0.06 to 0.125 µg/ml. There was one strain for which the ciprofloxacin MIC was 32 µg/ml, the trovafloxacin MIC was 2 µg/ml, and the clinafloxacin MIC
was 0.5 µg/ml. Quinolone MICs for resistant mutants resulting from
serial daily subculturing in subinhibitory concentrations of
antibiotics are summarized in Table 1.
Subculturing in clinafloxacin selected five resistant mutants with
stable resistance. Subculturing in the presence of trovafloxacin
selected six resistant mutants, for which the MICs rose from 0.06 to 2 µg/ml to 4 to 16 µg/ml after 30 to 50 subcultures. Subculturing in
ciprofloxacin selected eight resistant mutants, for which the MICs rose
from 1 to 4 µg/ml to 4 to 128 µg/ml after 14 to 39 subcultures.
Quinolone MICs for the strain for which the original ciprofloxacin MIC
was 32 µg/ml rose to 128 µg/ml.
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Selection of Resistance to Clinafloxacin,
Ciprofloxacin, and Trovafloxacin in Streptococcus
pneumoniae
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
9 to <1.1×10
11,
5.0×10
4 to 3.6×10
9, and
4.8×10
4 to 6.7×10
9, respectively. For two
strains with clinafloxacin MICs of 0.125 to 0.5 µg/ml trovafloxacin
MICs of 0.125 to 2 µg/ml, ciprofloxacin MICs of 4 to 32 µg/ml
mutation rates with drugs at the MIC were 1.1×10
8
9.6×10
8,
3.3×10
6
6.7×10
8, and
2.3×10
5
2.4×10
7, respectively.
Clinafloxacin was bactericidal at four times the MIC after 24 h
against three parent and nine mutant strains by time-kill study. This
study showed that single and multistep clinafloxacin exposure selected
for resistant mutants less frequently than similar exposures to other
drugs studied.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
2 µg/ml and susceptible to clinafloxacin when the MIC was
1
µg/ml, based on baseline MICs of ciprofloxacin and pharmacokinetics
of the other agents (3; M. A. Cohen, personal communication).
Tyr or Phe
in ParC and Ser83
Tyr or Phe in GyrA) were sequenced once in the
forward direction. Mutants with no mutations in a particular gene or
with a previously undescribed mutation were sequenced twice forward and
once in the reverse direction on products of independent PCR
experiments (7).
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Results of multi-step resistance selection by
clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin
Cross-resistance among mutant strains.
Among 30 multistep
mutant strains, 12 were resistant to trovafloxacin (five had high-level
trovafloxacin resistance [MIC
8 µg/ml]), 29 were resistant
to ciprofloxacin (18 had high-level ciprofloxacin resistance [MIC
43 µg/ml]), and 10 were resistant to clinafloxacin (MIC
2 µg/ml) (Table 2).
|
0.12 µg/ml), none
had high-level resistance to clinafloxacin. Three of these five
trovafloxacin-selected high-level-resistant mutants were
cross-resistant to clinafloxacin (strains 7, 8, and 10). Eight of the
high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants that were selected by
ciprofloxacin did not have high-level resistance to either
trovafloxacin or clinafloxacin. Two of four high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants (strains 3 and 10) selected by ciprofloxacin were resistant to both trovafloxacin (MIC, 4 µg/ml) and
clinafloxacin (MIC, 2 µg/ml). Among five clinafloxacin-resistant mutants selected by clinafloxacin, all had high-level resistance to
ciprofloxacin (MICs, 32 to 128 µg/ml), and two of them were resistant
to trovafloxacin (but did not have high-level resistance).
Serotyping and PFGE. The 10 pneumococcal strains used comprised serotypes 4, 6B, 7, 9, 14, and 23F. All mutants had serotypes identical to those of the parent strains, and all had PFGE patterns identical to those the parent strains.
Mutations in topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase.
Mutations in the
QRDR that led to amino acid changes are listed in Table 1. Parent
strains 4 and 9 had mutations in both ParC and ParE, and parent strains
1, 3, 6, and 7 had a variation in ParE (Ile460
Val) compared to
wild-type sequences; the roles of these variations in affecting
quinolone activity are unclear (6). The
ciprofloxacin-resistant parent strain 10 had mutations in both
ParC (Lys50
Glu and Ser79
Phe) and GyrA (Ser81
Cys),
explaining the resistance of this parent strain. In all other
strains the amino acid sequences for ParC, ParE, GyrA, and GyrB from
the parent strains were identical to the wild-type sequences.
Tyr in GyrA. Strain 6 selected by trovafloxacin (trovafloxacin
MIC, 0.06 to 1 µg/ml) had a mutation of Glu85
Lys in GyrA. Few had
mutations in ParE and GyrB except as follows: (i) the strain 6 mutant
selected by clinafloxacin had a mutation in ParE (Pro454
Ser), (ii)
the strain 7 mutant selected by trovafloxacin had a mutation in ParE
(Glu474
Lys), (iii) the strain 9 mutants selected by trovafloxacin or
ciprofloxacin had the same mutation in ParE (Arg447
Cys), (iv) the
strain 3 mutant selected by ciprofloxacin had a mutation in GyrB
(Arg445
Ser), and (v) the strain 10 mutants selected by trovafloxacin
and clinafloxacin had the same mutation in GyrB (Gly406
Ser).
Efflux mechanism. We investigated the possibility that the efflux mechanism contributed to the raised quinolone MICs for parent and mutant strains by determining MICs in the presence and absence of reserpine (Table 1). Quinolone MICs for 8 of the 10 parent strains were unaffected by the presence of reserpine; however, the ciprofloxacin MICs for strains 8 and 9 were four times lower in the presence of reserpine. For 17 of 30 mutants the ciprofloxacin MICs were four to eight times lower in presence of reserpine. Similarly, the clinafloxacin MICs for 12 mutants were lower (four to eight times lower). However, there were no mutants for which the trovafloxacin MICs were lower in the presence of reserpine. Reserpine lowered the ciprofloxacin MICs for 7 of 10 mutants for which the ciprofloxacin MICs were raised though they had no mutations in ParC, GyrA, ParE, and GyrB (strain 1, 5, 6, 7, and 10 mutants selected by ciprofloxacin and strain 8 and 9 mutants selected by clinafloxacin). Reserpine had no effect on the clinafloxacin MICs for two of four mutant strains that had no mutations in ParC, GyrA, ParE, and GyrB. Clinafloxacin MICs for a strain 1 mutant (selected after 32 passages with clinafloxacin) and a strain 3 mutant (selected after 32 passages) decreased from 16 to 1 µg/ml in the presence of reserpine. These strains had no difference in the QRDRs of parC, gyrA, parE, and gyrB compared to the parent strain by gene sequencing.
Frequency of single-step spontaneous mutation rate.
Results
for each strain are listed in Table 3.
For eight strains for which the clinafloxacin MICs were 0.06 µg/ml,
mutation rates with clinafloxacin at the MIC were lower
(2.0×10
9 to <1.1×10
11) than with
trovafloxacin (5.0×10
4 to 3.6×10
9) or
ciprofloxacin (4.8×10
4 to 6.7×10
9) at the
MIC. For another two strains for which the clinafloxacin MICs were
0.125 to 0.5 µg/ml, mutation rates with clinafloxacin at the MIC were
lower than those with the other quinolones. For all strains,
single-step spontaneous mutants could not be detected with each drug at
4, 8, and 16 times the MIC. Gene sequencing in the QRDRs of ParC and
GyrA and MIC testing with reserpine were carried out for single-step
mutants of strain 8. Mutant strains selected at one and two times the
MICs of trovafloxacin had mutations in ParC (one times the MIC of
trovafloxacin, Ser79
Tyr; two times the MIC of trovafloxacin,
Ser79
Phe), but not in GyrA; mutant strains selected at one and two
times the MICs of ciprofloxacin and at the MIC of clinafloxacin had no
mutations in either ParC or GyrA. There were no mutations in ParE and
GyrB. For none of these five single-step resistant mutants were the
trovafloxacin MICs lower in the presence of reserpine. However, the
ciprofloxacin MICs for all of the mutants were lower (four to
eightfold), and for four of them clinafloxacin MICs were lower
(fourfold) in the presence of reserpine.
|
Time-kill studies for parent strains and multistep resistant
mutants.
Clinafloxacin showed 99.9% killing of all three parent
strains and three of the resistant mutant strains at two times the MIC
after 24 h and 99% killing of all of strains after 12 h.
Trovafloxacin showed 99.9% killing of all parent strains and two of
three resistant mutant strains at four times the MIC after 24 h.
Ciprofloxacin showed 99.9% killing of all three parent strains and
three resistant mutant strains at two times the MIC after 24 h. An
example of kill kinetics is presented in Fig.
1.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study is the first of which we are aware which simultaneously
examines single and multistep selection for quinolone resistance in
pneumococci. We were readily able to select quinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae mutants after serial passages in subinhibitory
concentrations of trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or clinafloxacin. Five
mutant strains selected by ciprofloxacin became resistant (MIC
4 µg/ml) to ciprofloxacin more rapidly (14 subcultures) than mutants
selected by trovafloxacin or clinafloxacin. The minimum number of
subcultures required to select resistant mutants was 30 with
trovafloxacin and 32 with clinafloxacin. The frequencies of spontaneous
single-step mutation with clinafloxacin were lowest compared to the
other two quinolones (20).
Gene sequencing of the QRDRs of parC and gyrA in
this study has shown, as in previous studies, that the mutations
associated with quinolone resistance were Ser79
Phe or Tyr and
Asp83
Gly or His or Asn in ParC and Ser81
Phe or Tyr and
Glu85
Lys in GyrA (9, 11, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27). Mutations
not previously described for S. pneumoniae that were also
associated with quinolone resistance were His102
Try, Ala115
Pro,
or Ser107
Tyr in ParC and Ser81
Leu in GyrA. All of the five
high-level trovafloxacin-resistant mutants (MICs
8 µg/ml)
selected by trovafloxacin had mutations in both ParC and GyrA as
described previously (7, 11, 27), except for one mutant
(strain 10) selected by trovafloxacin (trovafloxacin MIC, 8 µg/ml)
that had no additional mutation compared to its parent strain in ParC.
Three high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants selected by
ciprofloxacin also had mutations in both ParC and GyrA, but one of them
had mutations only in ParC; another had mutations in both ParC and
ParE. A strain 9 mutant selected by clinafloxacin (clinafloxacin MIC, 2 µg/ml), for which the parent strain had a preexisting mutation in
ParC, did not have any further mutations in GyrA.
Gene sequencing of the QRDRs of parE in this study has
shown, as in previous studies by Pan and Fisher (20), that
mutations at Pro454 are associated with quinolone resistance. A strain
6 mutant selected by clinafloxacin (clinafloxacin MIC, 2 µg/ml) had
mutations in GyrA (Ser81
Tyr) and ParE (Pro454
Ser) but not ParC.
This result may suggest parE mutation is also important for
clinafloxacin resistance in strains with resistance with a gyrA mutation. Although ParC seems to be the target of
trovafloxacin and ParC and GyrA seem to be the targets of
clinafloxacin, exceptions may occur, e.g., strain 4 and 6 mutant
strains, which are quinolone resistant with a single mutation in GyrA.
Mutations at Arg447 in ParE have not been described previously and were
found in two quinolone-resistant mutants (strain 9 mutants selected by
trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin). The significance of this mutation is
not clear, because mutants selected by trovafloxacin also had mutations
in both ParC and GyrA and the mutant selected by ciprofloxacin also had
a mutation in ParC, which was reported as the primary ciprofloxacin
target by Pan and Fisher (19). A similar interpretation
applies to strains with mutations in the QRDR of GyrB. A strain 3 mutant selected by ciprofloxacin had a mutation in GyrB (Arg445
Ser)
and had mutations in both ParC and GyrA, and strain 10 mutants selected
by trovafloxacin and clinafloxacin had a mutation in GyrB
(Gly406
Ser) and had mutations in both ParC and GyrA. Therefore, it
is unclear what role GyrB mutations have in quinolone resistance.
Time-kills showed that all resistant clones were killed by
concentrations at or above two times the MIC after 24 h.
For two parent strains and 17 of the 30 mutants the MICs of at least one of the quinolones was lower in the presence of reserpine, which suggests the involvement of an efflux mechanism described previously by Baranova and Neyfakh and Brenwald et al. (2, 4). However, this effect was not seen equally for the three quinolones studied. The ciprofloxacin MIC for parent strain 9, for which the ciprofloxacin MICs were higher (4 µg/ml), was four times lower in the presence of reserpine. However, this parent strain also had a mutation in ParC, which is the target for ciprofloxacin resistance (19). The role of efflux in mutant strain 8 was unclear because parent strain 8 (ciprofloxacin MIC, 1 µg/ml) also had an efflux mechanism. Trovafloxacin MICs were not affected by reserpine in this study, suggesting that trovafloxacin is a poor substrate for PmrA or other reserpine-inhibitable pumps in those strains of pneumococci in which there was a substantial reserpine effect for the other drugs (10).
For strain 2 and 8 mutants selected by clinafloxacin, the clinafloxacin MICs were 16 to 32 times greater than the clinafloxacin MICs for parent strains, but no mutations in the QRDR of ParC, GyrA, ParE, and GyrB were found in these mutants. The clinafloxacin MICs of a strain 8 mutant selected by clinafloxacin was four times lower in the presence of reserpine. This suggests that an efflux mechanism plays an important role in clinafloxacin resistance, while this mechanism may play a limited role for trovafloxacin. The trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or clinafloxacin MICs for the strain 2 mutant did not change in the presence of reserpine. This result suggests that quinolone resistance mechanisms other than mutations in the QRDR and efflux mechanisms exist or that reserpine did not affect the efflux mechanism of this strain. Two strains (strain 1 and 3 mutants selected with clinafloxacin) which showed unstable increased resistance had the efflux mechanism, which was lost with subsequent subcultures.
In our study, most high-level clinafloxacin-resistant mutant strains had mutations in ParC at Ser79 or Asp83 and GyrA at Ser81 as previously reported (20). The efflux mechanism was also thought to be a resistance mechanism for clinafloxacin. Single and multistep testing showed clinafloxacin selected resistant mutants less frequently than trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin. These in vitro results may suggest that clinafloxacin would be less likely than trovafloxacin or ciprofloxacin to result in the development of resistance.
Although the quinolone MICs for mutants selected by all three agents increased equally above those for parent strains, MICs of clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin remained below the susceptible breakpoints of these agents in about two-thirds of the mutants. Results of this study indicate that this class of compound has potential for treatment of pneumococcal infections, including those caused by strains resistant to older quinolones.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant from Parke-Davis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033. Phone: (717) 531-5113. Fax: (717) 531-7953. E-mail: pappelbaum{at}psu.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Appelbaum, P. C. 1992. Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: an overview. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:77-83[Medline]. |
| 2. | Baranova, N. N., and A. A. Neyfakh. 1997. Apparent involvement of a multidrug transporter in the fluoroquinolone resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1396-1398[Abstract]. |
| 3. |
Blondeau, J. M.
1999.
A review of the comparative in-vitro activities of 12 antimicrobial agents, with a focus on five new `respiratory quinolones.'
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
43(Suppl. B):1-11 |
| 4. |
Brenwald, N. P.,
M. J. Gill, and R. Wise.
1998.
Prevalence of putative efflux mechanism among fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2032-2035 |
| 5. | Chen, D. K., A. McGeer, J. C. de Azavedo, and D. E. Low. 1999. Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolone in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 22:233-239. |
| 6. |
Davies, T. A.,
L. M. Kelly,
G. A. Pankuch,
K. L. Credito,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
2000.
Antipneumococal activities of gemifloxacin compared to those of nine other agents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
44:304-310 |
| 7. |
Davies, T. A.,
G. A. Pankuch,
B. E. Dewasse,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1999.
In vitro development of resistance to five quinolones and amoxicillin-clavulanate in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1177-1182 |
| 8. |
Ednie, L. M.,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1998.
Comparative activities of clinafloxacin against gram-positive and -negative bacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1269-1273 |
| 9. |
Fukuda, H., and K. Hiramatsu.
1999.
Primary targets of fluoroquinolones in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:410-412 |
| 10. |
Gill, M. J.,
N. P. Brenwald, and R. Wise.
1999.
Identification of an efflux pump gene, pmrA, associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:187-189 |
| 11. | Gootz, T. D., R. Zaniewski, S. Haskell, B. Schmieder, J. Tankovic, D. Girard, P. Courvalin, and R. J. Polzer. 1996. Activity of the new fluoroquinolone trovafloxacin (CP-99,219) against DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae selected in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2691-2697[Abstract]. |
| 12. |
Ho, P.-L.,
T.-L. Que,
D. N.-C. Tsang,
T.-K. Ng,
K.-H. Chow, and W.-H. Seto.
1999.
Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among multiply resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Hong Kong.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1310-1313 |
| 13. |
Jacobs, M. R.,
S. Bajaksouzian,
A. Zilles,
G. Lin,
G. A. Pankuch, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1999.
Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 U.S. surveillance study.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1901-1908 |
| 14. | Janoir, C., V. Zeller, M. Kitzis, N. J. Moreau, and L. Gutmann. 1996. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae requires mutation in parC and gyrA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2760-2764[Abstract]. |
| 15. | Liñares, J., A. G. Campa, and R. Pallares. 1999. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 20:1546-1548. |
| 16. | Moissenet, D., M. Valcin, V. Marchand, E.-N. Garabédian, P. Geslin, A. Garbarg-Chenon, and H. Vu-Thien. 1997. Molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibility to penicillin in a Paris children's hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:298-301[Abstract]. |
| 17. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 8th informational supplement. M100-S8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa. |
| 18. |
Pan, X.-S., and L. M. Fisher.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of the parC and parE genes of Streptococcus pneumoniae encoding DNA topoisomerase IV: role in fluoroquinolone resistance.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4060-4069 |
| 19. | Pan, X.-S., J. Ambler, S. Mehtar, and L. M. Fisher. 1996. Involvement of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase as ciprofloxacin targets in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2321-2326[Abstract]. |
| 20. |
Pan, X.-S., and L. M. Fisher.
1998.
DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are dual targets of clinafloxacin action in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2810-2816 |
| 21. | Pankuch, G. A., C. Lichtenberger, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1996. Antipneumococcal activities of RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), penicillin G, erythromycin, and sparfloxacin determined by MIC and rapid time-kill methodologies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1653-1656[Abstract]. |
| 22. |
Pankuch, G. A.,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1998.
Antipneumococcal activity of grepafloxacin compared to that of other agents by time-kill methodology.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1263-1265 |
| 23. |
Pankuch, G. A.,
S. A. Jueneman,
T. A. Davies,
M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum.
1998.
In vitro selection of resistance to four -lactams and azithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2914-2918 |
| 24. | Perichon, B., J. Tankovic, and P. Courvalin. 1999. Characterization of a mutation in the parE gene that confers fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1166-1167[Abstract]. |
| 25. |
Piddock, L. J.,
M. Johnson,
V. Ricci, and S. L. Hill.
1998.
Activities of new fluoroquinolones against fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens of the lower respiratory tract.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2956-2960 |
| 26. | Tankovic, J., B. Perichon, J. Duval, and P. Courvalin. 1996. Contribution of mutations in gyrA and parC genes to fluoroquinolone resistance of mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae obtained in vivo and in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2505-2510[Abstract]. |
| 27. |
Varon, E.,
C. Janoir,
M.-D. Kitzis, and L. Gutmann.
1999.
ParC and GyrA may be interchangeable initial targets of some fluoroquinolones in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:302-306 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |