Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2000, p. 2752-2758, Vol. 44, No. 10
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Flow Cytometry Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of
Pathogenic Yeasts other than Candida albicans and Comparison
with the NCCLS Broth Microdilution Test
Rama
Ramani1 and
Vishnu
Chaturvedi1,2,*
Mycology Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New
York State Department of Health,1 and
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health,
State University of New York
Albany,2 Albany,
New York
Received 7 January 2000/Returned for modification 14 February
2000/Accepted 12 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Candida species other than Candida albicans
frequently cause nosocomial infections in immunocompromised patients.
Some of these pathogens have either variable susceptibility patterns or intrinsic resistance against common azoles. The availability of a rapid
and reproducible susceptibility-testing method is likely to help in the
selection of an appropriate regimen for therapy. A flow cytometry (FC)
method was used in the present study for susceptibility testing of
Candida glabrata, Candida guilliermondii, Candida krusei, Candida lusitaniae,
Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, and
Cryptococcus neoformans based on accumulation of the DNA
binding dye propidium iodide (PI). The results were compared with MIC
results obtained for amphotericin B and fluconazole using the NCCLS
broth microdilution method (M27-A). For FC, the yeast inoculum was
prepared spectrophotometrically, the drugs were diluted in either RPMI
1640 or yeast nitrogen base containing 1% dextrose, and yeast samples
and drug dilutions were incubated with amphotericin B and fluconazole,
respectively, for 4 to 6 h. Sodium deoxycholate and PI were added
at the end of incubation, and fluorescence was measured with a FACScan
flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The lowest drug concentration that
showed a 50% increase in mean channel fluorescence compared to that of
the growth control was designated the MIC. All tests were repeated
once. The MICs obtained by FC for all yeast isolates except C. lusitaniae were in very good agreement (within 1 dilution) of the
results of the NCCLS broth microdilution method. Paired t
test values were not statistically significant (P = 0.377 for amphotericin B; P = 0.383 for fluconazole).
Exceptionally, C. lusitaniae isolates showed higher MICs (2 dilutions or more) than in the corresponding NCCLS broth microdilution
method for amphotericin B. Overall, FC antifungal susceptibility
testing provided rapid, reproducible results that were statistically
comparable to those obtained with the NCCLS method.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
There has been an apparent shift in
infections caused by Candida spp., with non-albicans
Candida spp. assuming an ever-increasing role in the pathogenesis
of candidemia (1). The newer antifungals have been effective
in the treatment of systemic fungal infections and offer a potent
alternative to potentially toxic amphotericin B therapy (8).
It is well documented, however, that several pathogenic yeasts have
either intrinsic or acquired resistance to the azole antifungal drugs
(17). It is advisable, therefore, to determine the
antifungal susceptibility patterns of patient isolates, which may
assist in making appropriate decisions regarding the best therapeutic
option (13). The National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference broth dilution method (M27-A) is
a benchmark currently used in diagnostic laboratories for antifungal
susceptibility testing of pathogenic yeasts (10).
A number of investigators have reported flow cytometry (FC) methods to
obtain rapid susceptibility results for Candida albicans (4-6, 11, 12, 14-16, 19). These methods measure the
effects of the change in membrane potential due to antifungal
compounds, the change in metabolic activity due to membrane damage, or
the uptake of DNA binding dye in the yeast cell. An improved FC
susceptibility-testing method was previously developed in our
laboratory (16). The method used sodium deoxycholate for
permeability and propidium iodide (PI), a membrane-impermeant
DNA-intercalating dye, to detect increased permeability of the cell
membrane after antifungal treatment. We have further modified this
method for other pathogenic Candida spp. and
Cryptococcus neoformans and compared the MIC obtained by the
FC method with that obtained by the reference NCCLS broth microdilution method.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Organisms.
Eighty-two isolates of various yeasts (11 Candida glabrata, 10 Candida guilliermondii, 10 Candida krusei, 11 Candida lusitaniae, 13 Candida parapsilosis, 11 Candida tropicalis, and
16 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates) were tested in parallel
by the FC assay and the NCCLS broth microdilution method. The test
organisms were either recent clinical isolates or from laboratory
culture collections. These cultures were maintained at
20°C on
potato dextrose agar. Before the assays, the cultures were passaged
twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar at 35°C.
Quality control strains.
Two quality control strains
recommended by NCCLS, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and
C. krusei ATCC 6258, were included with each series of experiments.
Antifungal agent.
Amphotericin B was purchased from Sigma
Chemical Company (St. Louis, Mo.), and fluconazole was a gift from
Roerig/Pfizer Pharmaceuticals (New York, N.Y.). Stock solutions of
amphotericin B and fluconazole were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide at
concentrations of 1,600 and 6,400 µg/ml, respectively, and stored at
70°C.
Antifungal susceptibility testing using NCCLS broth microdilution
test.
The broth microdilution test was performed in accordance
with standard M27-A (10). Briefly, serial twofold dilutions
of amphotericin B and fluconazole were prepared with RPMI 1640 in microtiter plates. The microtiter plates were stored at
70°C and
thawed as required. Inoculum preparation was slightly modified from the
NCCLS method by not using a match to 0.5 MacFarland standard; instead,
samples of 24- or 48-h-old cultures were suspended in 0.85% saline and
the cells were counted in a hemocytometer to yield stock suspensions of
1 × 106 to 5 × 106 cells/ml and
diluted to the final concentration of 0.5 × 103 to
2.5 × 103 CFU/ml. The mixture of drugs and inoculum
was incubated at 35°C and read after 48 h; the incubation period
was up to 72 h for C. neoformans.
FC susceptibility test.
The FC assay was performed
essentially as described in an earlier report (16). Briefly,
serial twofold dilutions of amphotericin B ranging from 0.03 to 16 µg/ml and of fluconazole ranging from 0.06 to 64 µg/ml were
prepared with RPMI 1640 containing L-glutamine without
bicarbonate buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid). The yeast isolates were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates
for 18 to 24 h at 35°C. Yeast suspensions were prepared in
0.85% sterile saline. The yeast cell density was adjusted
spectrophotometrically to 0.5 MacFarland standard. One-half milliliter
of the yeast suspension was added to 0.5 ml of serial drug dilution
solution and incubated at 35°C. The growth control tube contained
yeast suspension and RPMI 1640 without drugs. For
non-albicans species, the mixture of drug and yeast
suspension was incubated for 2 h for amphotericin B and 4 h
for fluconazole. At the end of incubation, 200 µl of the mixture of
yeast and drug were placed in 12- by 75-mm tubes (Falcon; Becton
Dickinson, Lincoln Park, N.J.). Two hundred microliters of 25 mM sodium
deoxycholate (Sigma Chemical Company) and 5 µl of PI (200 µg/ml)
were added to each dilution, and the tubes were gently mixed by
flicking them with the fingers. Controls included samples containing
viable cells, heat-killed cells, cells with sodium deoxycholate, and
cells with PI and sodium deoxycholate. Each tube was analyzed with a
FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) with Cell Quest software for
data acquisition and analysis. The sample volume was 75 µl, and the
sample flow rate was 10 µl/min. The instrument settings were as
follows: forward scatter, 3.73 linear gain; side scatter, 270 V log;
fluorescence (FL2), 457 V log; and threshold value, 52. Each sample was
analyzed for 10,000 events or yeast cells. Electronic gates were set up
based on live cells used in control experiments. Cell debris and
clusters below the gates were not included in sample analyses. The
samples were analyzed for forward scatter, side scatter, log of red
fluorescence, and mean channel fluorescence (MCF; the intensity of
fluorescence of yeasts labeled with PI). The instrument was calibrated
and DNA beads were aligned on a daily basis, according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The MIC was defined as the lowest
concentration of drug that showed an increase of 50% in MCF compared
to that of the growth control. If an abrupt increase in MCF occurred
for two drug dilutions yielding values much lower or higher than 50%, then the higher drug concentration was taken as the MIC (see Fig. 2).
All samples were tested twice.
FC susceptibility testing for Cryptococcus neoformans.
Drug dilutions for amphotericin B and fluconazole were prepared in RPMI
1640 and in yeast nitrogen base with 1% dextrose. The inoculum was
prepared from 48-h-old cultures as described in a previous report
(16). The inoculum was added to the drug dilutions. The
suspensions containing amphotericin B and fluconazole with
Cryptococcus neoformans were incubated at 35°C for 4 and 6 h, respectively. The flow cytometer settings and controls for Cryptococcus neoformans were similar to those used for other
yeast isolates, and MCF was used to calculate the MICs.
Data analysis.
For comparisons of MICs calculated by the
NCCLS method and FC, MIC-0 represented the proportion of isolates with
similar MICs by two methods, and MIC-1 represented the proportion of
isolates with MICs within 1 dilution by two methods. Additionally,
paired t test values (P) were calculated for
amphotericin B and fluconazole using Microsoft Excel software (version
5.0). P values of
0.001 were considered highly significant.
 |
RESULTS |
NCCLS broth microdilution analysis.
The MIC results were read
as described in standard M27-A (10). For amphotericin B, the
lowest drug concentration that showed complete growth inhibition was
considered the MIC for an isolate, while 50% growth inhibition
compared to the growth control was considered the fluconazole MIC. The
MICs for quality control strains were within the published range with
each run of experiments (details not shown). The MICs for various
yeasts obtained by NCCLS broth microdilution are summarized in
Table 1.
FC analysis of yeast cells.
The instrument parameters
described above were set up based on FC analyses of live and dead cells
in control experiments. Initially, control tubes containing viable and
heat-killed cells of all isolates were stained with PI to measure the
MCF from log 1 to log 3. Control tubes containing viable cells stained
with PI fluoresced in log 1 scale, while heat-killed cells fluoresced in log 3 scale (Fig. 1A and E). The
combination of 50% live and 50% dead cells with intermediate PI
staining is depicted in Fig. 1C. Based on control live cells, an
electronic gate (R1) was set up excluding clusters and cell debris
(Fig. 1B). A marked shift of dead cells from R1 is shown in Fig. 1F.
The experiments were repeated twice with identical results (data not
shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
FC analyses of control cells. C. parapsilosis
ATCC 22019 was used to establish analytical parameters. (A) 3-D plot
illustrating forward scatter versus fluorescence for live cells.
Fluorescence was seen in log 1 scale. (B) Two-dimensional contour plot
depicting the electronic gate (R1) set up for live cells. The results
of 50% of the events are shown. (C) 3-D plot illustrating two
fluorescence peaks for a mixture of 50% live and 50% dead cells. (D)
Two-dimensional contour plot depicting 50% live and dead cells in the
R1 gate. (E) 3-D plot illustrating heat-killed cells. Fluorescence was
seen in log 3 scale. (F) Two-dimensional contour plot depicting dead
cells with complete shift in forward scatter and fluorescence compared
to panel A. These cells were small and shifted out of the gate R1.
|
|
FC susceptibility testing.
The mean PI fluorescence intensity
of untreated control cells was analyzed first. An incubation time of
less than 2 h did not yield adequate fluorescence (data not
shown). When cells treated with increasing concentrations of
antifungals were analyzed, cell membrane damage was noticeable by
increased cellular fluorescence intensity that resulted from increased
uptake of PI. The gradual increase in MCF obtained with increasing
concentrations of amphotericin B is illustrated in Fig.
2 by means of three-dimensional (3-D) plots. The amphotericin B concentration contributing to a 50% or more
MCF increase compared to the growth control was considered the MIC,
which is represented by C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (Fig. 2).
The gradual increase in MCF with increasing concentrations of
fluconazole is depicted in Fig. 3. The
fluconazole concentration (2 µg/ml) at which an MCF of 57.3% was
obtained compared to the growth control was considered the MIC. A
summary of MICs obtained for all yeast isolates is presented in Table
1.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of amphotericin B on C. parapsilosis
ATCC 22019. (A) 3-D plot depicting growth control. (B to I) 3-D plots
illustrating increasing concentrations of amphotericin B, with dead
cells indicated as percent MCF. The dilution at which the percent MCF
increased to 50% or more was the MIC of the isolate. In this isolate,
an abrupt increase of percent MCF from 28.7% at 0.25 µg to 98.3% at
0.5 µg of amphotericin B/ml was seen; therefore, the MIC is
considered to be 0.5 µg/ml.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of fluconazole on C. parapsilosis ATCC
22019. (A) 3-D plot depicting growth control. (B to I) 3-D plots
illustrating increasing concentrations of fluconazole, with dead cells
indicated as percent MCF. The MIC of the isolate was the drug
concentration at which the MCF was equal to or more than 50%. In this
isolate, an increase of percent MCF from 42.2% at 1.0 µg to 57.3%
at 2.0 µg of fluconazole/ml was seen; therefore, 2.0 µg/ml was
considered the MIC.
|
|
The correlation of antifungal concentration with cell counts in forward
scatter and the percentage of MCF is depicted in Fig.
4. At the lowest concentration of both
drugs (0.03 µg/ml for amphotericin
B and 0.06 µg/ml for
fluconazole), the cell counts were highest,
with a negligible MCF.
There was a gradual increase in the MCF
with a concomitant decline in
cell counts at increasing drug concentrations.
As expected, the highest
MCFs were observed with 16 µg of amphotericin
B and 64 µg of
fluconazole. Additionally, there were few detectable
cells with the
highest amphotericin B treatment, while 15% of
the cells were still
detectable after incubation with 64 µg of
fluconazole.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Correlation of amphotericin B (amp B) and fluconazole
(flu) concentrations with both cell counts in forward scatter (solid
lines) and percentage MCF (dashed lines) obtained for C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019. At the lowest drug concentration, i.e.,
0.03 µg/ml and 0.06 µg/ml for amphotericin B and fluconazole,
respectively, the MCF was negligible while cell counts were highest. As
the drug concentrations increased, there was a proportional MCF
increase and cell count decrease. Note fewer detectable cells with
amphotericin B (16 µg/ml) versus a residual population seen at the
highest concentration of fluconazole (64 µg/ml).
|
|
FC susceptibility testing of
Cryptococcus neoformans did not
yield consistent results due to the poor growth of test strains
in RPMI
1640 (details not shown). Subsequently, RPMI 1640 was
replaced with
yeast nitrogen broth-1% dextrose and the incubation
period was raised
to 4 and 6 h for amphotericin B and fluconazole,
respectively.
These changes yielded consistent MICs that were
comparable to the
results obtained with the broth microdilution
method.
Comparison of NCCLS and FC methods.
A comparison of the data
obtained by the FC and NCCLS methods is presented in Table
2. FC MICs were within one drug dilution of those of the reference method for most yeast isolates. A good percentage of agreement (see Materials and Methods) is evident between
the values obtained by the NCCLS and FC methods (Table 2). Amphotericin
B MIC-0 values for all isolates showed 95 to 99% agreement between the
NCCLS and FC methods, while fluconazole MIC-0 values were 96 to
99% in agreement. Paired t test results also showed no
significant difference in the results obtained by the two methods
(P = 0.377 and 0.383 for amphotericin B and fluconazole, respectively). The only exception to good agreement between the NCCLS and FC methods was seen with C. lusitaniae, for which the MICs obtained by the two methods were
quite variable.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results of this study suggested that Candida spp.
and Cryptococcus neoformans could be tested for amphotericin
B and fluconazole by FC within 2 to 6 h of incubation,
respectively. Amphotericin B, a fungicidal drug, caused shrinkage of
yeast cells, as was evident from a decrease in the ratio of forward
scatter and side scatter (16). Fluconazole, which is known
to inhibit cell growth by disruption of sterol biosynthesis, led to an
increase in cell size, apparently due to the accumulation of culture
medium. This resulted in an increase in the ratio of forward scatter
and side scatter. Subsequently, these cells also disintegrated, perhaps due to increased turgor pressure. Since fluconazole acts by blocking ergosterol formation, an incubation period that is longer than a single
generation time seemed an essential prerequisite in order to detect
this metabolic effect. Our culture conditions, dilution scheme, and
incubation conditions were comparable to those recommended by NCCLS.
The results reinforced our previous report that the MCF was a reliable
indicator of the MIC for all strains, including strains for which the
MICs were high. Interestingly, we did not notice any "trailing
effect," characterized by the lack of a definite reading endpoint, as
observed in the NCCLS tests of susceptibility to azoles. Perhaps a
shorter incubation and cumulative analyses of individual cells
minimized the trailing artifact. It has also been suggested recently
that adjustment of the medium pH could eliminate this artifact in the
NCCLS test (9).
The present study utilized sodium deoxycholate to enhance the diffusion
of PI across the cell wall, enhancing its penetration into the damaged
yeast cell membranes. The growth controls did not show dye uptake in
the presence of deoxycholate (7). However, the technique as
used is only applicable to the antifungal agents that directly or
indirectly affect fungal membrane integrity. Previously, Green et al.
(4) used PI without sodium deoxycholate and obtained results
(MICs) in 6 h. In the present study, the combination of PI with
sodium deoxycholate gave faster results, perhaps because deoxycholate
enhanced PI penetration.
In previous FC studies, MICs obtained by FC susceptibility testing were
compared to those obtained with the standard NCCLS broth macrodilution
method (4-6, 12, 16, 19). The investigators mainly used
C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the
present study, we have used non-albicans Candida species and
C. neoformans, as the incidence of serious yeast infections
caused by these organisms is increasing (1). Kirk et al.
(5) used acridine orange as a florophore for FC testing.
These investigators obtained MICs in 8 h and compared them to
results obtained with the NCCLS broth macrodilution method. However,
acridine orange binds to DNA, RNA, and lysosomes, and therefore, the
results are likely to be affected by the growth phase of the fungal
cells (2). Ordonez and Wehman (11) and Peyron et
al. (12) have used 3,3'-dipentyloxacarbocyanine iodide for
FC susceptibility testing of Candida species against amphotericin B. Their assay was completed in 30 min, and the results obtained were comparable with those of NCCLS broth dilution
(12). This is a very promising series of reports on rapid
susceptibility testing, which ought to be applied to the testing of
azole antifungals.
The high MICs of amphotericin B obtained for C. lusitaniae
by the FC method were in sharp contrast to the susceptible range obtained with the NCCLS broth microdilution method. It has been suggested that the NCCLS methodology has a limited ability to detect
resistance to amphotericin B (18). Instead of RPMI 1640, antibiotic medium 3 was used to discriminate between resistant and
susceptible isolates for amphotericin B (18). Antibiotic medium 3 could not be used for FC susceptibility testing because it
interfered with PI fluorescence. More investigations are needed to
evaluate whether FC could provide a better screen for amphotericin B resistance.
The FC assay for Cryptococcus neoformans did not yield
comparable results when RPMI 1640 was used. Other investigators have reported that yeast nitrogen broth with 1% dextrose provided better susceptibility results for Cryptococcus neoformans
(3). Our results supported the better efficacy of yeast
nitrogen broth for susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus
neoformans. The longer incubations needed for Cryptococcus
neoformans testing could be due to a longer generation time as
well as the presence of a capsule, which may impede the penetration of
drugs and fluorophores.
In conclusion, FC antifungal susceptibility testing provided rapid,
reproducible results that were comparable to those obtained by the
NCCLS method. The time required to obtain MICs by FC susceptibility testing varied from 2 to 6 h compared to the 24 to 72 h
required in the NCCLS broth microdilution method. The FC procedure is
simple and can be useful in research and clinical practice by providing precise MIC cutoff points. One obvious drawback of this approach is the
need for specialized equipment, which limits its use in routine
laboratories. Further evaluations are necessary to assess the
usefulness of FC as a technique for antifungal susceptibility testing.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Andrea Doney of the Mycology Laboratory for doing NCCLS
susceptibility testing of yeast isolates and Robert Dilwith of the
Immunology Core, Wadsworth Center, for his skillful operation of the
flow cytometer. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for constructive suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mycology
Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 120 New Scotland Ave., Albany, NY 12208-2002. Phone: (518) 474-4177. Fax: (518) 486-7971. E-mail: vishnu{at}wadsworth.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Coleman, D. C.,
M. G. Rinaldi,
K. A. Haynes,
J. H. Rex,
R. C. Summerbell,
E. J. Anaissie,
A. Li, and D. J. Sullivan.
1998.
Importance of Candida species other than Candida albicans as opportunistic pathogens.
Med. Mycol.
36(Suppl. 1):156-165.
|
| 2.
|
Darzynkiewicz, Z., and J. Kapuscinski.
1990.
Acridine orange: a versatile probe of nucleic acids and other cell constituents, p. 291-314.
In
M. A. Melamed, T. Lindmo, and M. L. Mendelsohn (ed.), Flow cytometry and sorting, 2nd ed. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Ghannoum, M. A.,
A. S. Ibrahim,
Y. Fu,
M. C. Shafiq,
J. E. Edwards, and R. S. Criddle.
1992.
Susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a microdilution technique.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2881-2886[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Green, L.,
B. Petersen,
L. Steimel,
P. Haeber, and W. Current.
1994.
Rapid determination of antifungal activity by flow cytometry.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1088-1091[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Kirk, S. M.,
S. M. Callister,
L. C. L. Lim, and R. F. Schell.
1997.
Rapid susceptibility testing of Candida albicans by flow cytometry.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:358-363[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Lee, W., and Y. Kwak.
1999.
Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species by flow cytometry.
J. Korean Med. Sci.
14:21-26[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Lehrer, R. I., and M. J. Cline.
1969.
Interventions of Candida albicans with human leucocytes and serum.
J. Bacteriol.
98:996-1004[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Lewis, R. E., and M. E. Klepser.
1999.
The changing face of nosocomial candidemia: epidemiology, resistance, and drug therapy.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.
56:525-533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Marr, K. A.,
T. R. Rustad,
J. H. Rex, and T. C. White.
1999.
The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1383-1386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1998.
Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. M27-A.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 11.
|
Ordonez, J. V., and N. M. Wehman.
1995.
Amphotericin B susceptibility of Candida species assessed by rapid flow cytometric membrane potential assay.
Cytometry
22:154-157[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Peyron, F. A.,
H. Favel,
M. Guiraud-Dauriac,
M. El Mzibri,
C. Chastin,
G. Dumenil, and P. Regli.
1997.
Evaluation of a flow cytofluorometric method for rapid determination of amphotericin B susceptibility of yeast isolates.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1537-1540[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Pfaller, M. A.,
J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1997.
Antifungal susceptibility testing: technical advances and potential clinical applications.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:776-784[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Pore, R. S.
1994.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing by flow cytometry.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
34:613-627[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Pore, R. S.
1990.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Candida albicans by flow cytometry.
Curr. Microbiol.
20:323-328.
|
| 16.
|
Ramani, R.,
A. Ramani, and S. J. Wong.
1997.
Rapid flow cytometric susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2320-2324[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Rex, J. H.,
M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller.
1995.
Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1-8[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Rex, J. H.,
C. H. Cooper, Jr.,
W. G. Merz,
J. N. Galgiani, and E. J. Anaissie.
1995.
Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based system.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:906-909[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Wenich, C.,
K. F. Linnau,
B. Parschalk,
K. Zedtwitz-Liebenstein, and A. Georgopoulos.
1997.
Rapid susceptibility testing of fungi by flow cytometry using vital staining.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:5-10[Abstract].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2000, p. 2752-2758, Vol. 44, No. 10
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pina-Vaz, C., Costa-de-Oliveira, S., Rodrigues, A. G., Espinel-Ingroff, A.
(2005). Comparison of Two Probes for Testing Susceptibilities of Pathogenic Yeasts to Voriconazole, Itraconazole, and Caspofungin by Flow Cytometry. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 4674-4679
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peter, J., Armstrong, D., Lyman, C. A., Walsh, T. J.
(2005). Use of Fluorescent Probes To Determine MICs of Amphotericin B and Caspofungin against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 3788-3792
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mitchell, M., Hudspeth, M., Wright, A.
(2005). Flow Cytometry Susceptibility Testing for the Antifungal Caspofungin. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2586-2589
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rudensky, B., Broidie, E., Yinnon, A. M., Weitzman, T., Paz, E., Keller, N., Raveh, D.
(2005). Rapid flow-cytometric susceptibility testing of Candida species. J Antimicrob Chemother
55: 106-109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mateus, C., Crow, S. A. Jr., Ahearn, D. G.
(2004). Adherence of Candida albicans to Silicone Induces Immediate Enhanced Tolerance to Fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3358-3366
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chaturvedi, V., Ramani, R., Pfaller, M. A.
(2004). Collaborative Study of the NCCLS and Flow Cytometry Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 2249-2251
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chaturvedi, V., Ramani, R., Rex, J. H.
(2004). Collaborative Study of Antibiotic Medium 3 and Flow Cytometry for Identification of Amphotericin B-Resistant Candida Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 2252-2254
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramani, R., Gangwar, M., Chaturvedi, V.
(2003). Flow Cytometry Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Aspergillus fumigatus and Comparison of Mode of Action of Voriconazole vis-a-vis Amphotericin B and Itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3627-3629
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Balajee, S. A., Marr, K. A.
(2002). Conidial Viability Assay for Rapid Susceptibility Testing of Aspergillus Species. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2741-2745
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Walsh, T. J., Chaturvedi, V., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Gosey, L. L., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Sheehan, D. J., Warnock, D. W.
(2001). Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Practical Aspects and Current Challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
14: 643-658
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wenisch, C., Moore, C. B., Krause, R., Presterl, E., Pichna, P., Denning, D. W.
(2001). Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Fluconazole by Flow Cytometry Correlates with Clinical Outcome. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 2458-2462
[Abstract]
[Full Text]