Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3055-3060, Vol. 44, No. 11
Groupe de Recherche sur les Antimicrobiens et
les Micro-organismes (GRAM, EA 2656), 76031 Rouen, France
Received 2 March 2000/Returned for modification 1 July
2000/Accepted 24 August 2000
Several studies have previously reported synergistic effects
between vancomycin and a given Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains represent a worldwide
threat because of their virulence and their broad distribution in the
hospital setting. Moreover, the MRSA strains are often resistant not
only to The purposes of this investigation were (i) to determine among 26 commonly available (Part of this work was presented at the 38th Interscience Conference on
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [abstr. E58, p. 185], San
Diego, Calif., September 1998.)
Bacterial strains.
A total of 32 clinical MRSA strains
selected from 32 individual patients attending the Rouen University
Hospital between 1995 and 1997 were studied. Twenty-eight isolates were
obtained from blood, two were from pleural fluid, one was from
pericardial fluid, and one was from joint fluid. They were identified
to the species level by conventional methods (colony morphology, Gram
stain characteristics, coagulase reactions). All strains were
methicillin resistant, as determined by a disk diffusion method with a
5-µg oxacillin disk (10) and by PCR amplification of the
mecA gene (2). Strains were considered
heterogeneously resistant to methicillin when partial growth within the
inhibition zone or the presence of microcolonies around the oxacillin
disk was observed. None of the 32 strains had reduced susceptibility to
glycopeptides. The study population was chosen according to the
strains' patterns of susceptibility to aminoglycosides as determined
by a disk diffusion technique described by the Comité de
l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de
Microbiologie (10). The aminoglycoside resistance mechanism
was determined after applying the aminoglycoside resistance pattern to
12 aminoglycosides by a disk susceptibility test described by Miller et
al. (21). Seventeen strains seemed to produce a bifunctional
[AAC(6') + APH(2")] enzyme associated with ANT(4') (4 strains)
or with APH(3') (13 strains), and 10 seemed to produce the ANT(4')
enzyme alone. The production of the two enzyme combinations cited above
notably confers resistance to kanamycin, tobramycin, and gentamicin
(i.e., a Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype),
whereas production of the ANT(4') enzyme alone determines resistance to
kanamycin and tobramycin (i.e., a Kmr Tmr
phenotype) (31). The five remaining strains were susceptible to aminoglycosides.
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Synergistic Effects of Double and Triple
Combinations of
-Lactams, Vancomycin, and Netilmicin against
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Strains
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-lactam or a given aminoglycoside against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
strains. The aim of our study was to exhaustively compare the effects
of different combinations of a
-lactam, vancomycin, and/or an
aminoglycoside against 32 clinical MRSA strains with different
aminoglycoside susceptibility patterns. The effects of 26 different
-lactam-vancomycin and 8 different aminoglycoside-vancomycin
combinations were first studied using a disk diffusion screening
method. The best interactions with vancomycin were observed with either
imipenem, cefazolin, or netilmicin. By checkerboard studies,
imipenem-vancomycin and cefazolin-vancomycin each provided a
synergistic bacteriostatic effect against 22 strains; the mean
fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indexes were 0.35 and 0.46 for imipenem-vancomycin and cefazolin-vancomycin, respectively. The
vancomycin-netilmicin combination provided an indifferent effect
against all of the 32 strains tested; the mean of FIC index was 1.096. The mean concentrations of imipenem, cefazolin, netilmicin, and
vancomycin at which FIC indexes were calculated were clinically
achievable. Killing experiments were then performed using imipenem,
cefazolin, netilmicin, and vancomycin at one-half of the MIC, alone and
in different combinations, against 10 strains. The
vancomycin-netilmicin regimen was rarely bactericidal, even against
strains susceptible to netilmicin. The imipenem-vancomycin and
cefazolin-vancomycin combinations were strongly bactericidal against
six and five strains, respectively. The addition of netilmicin markedly
enhanced the killing activity of the combination of cefazolin or
imipenem plus vancomycin, but only for the MRSA strains against which
the
-lactam-vancomycin combinations had no bactericidal effect. It
is noteworthy that the latter strains were both susceptible to
netilmicin and heterogeneously resistant to methicillin.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-lactam agents but also to fluoroquinolones,
chloramphenicol, clindamycin, tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides
(20). Vancomycin is almost universally accepted as the drug
of choice for the treatment of MRSA infections (13, 20).
However, vancomycin used alone kills staphylococci slowly (1), resulting in delayed recovery of patients with
life-threatening infections (19, 33). In addition,
clinicians now have to face the emergence of strains with reduced
susceptibility to vancomycin, i.e., so-called glycopeptide-intermediate
S. aureus (GISA) (4, 5, 15, 16). Therefore, there
is clearly a need for new antibiotic regimens with strong early
bactericidal activity against MRSA. In this field, an alternative to
the development of new classes of agents could be the use of
combinations of well-known compounds. Some investigators have reported
synergistic bacteriostatic and bactericidal (where tested) effects of
different
-lactams or different aminoglycosides combined with
vancomycin against MRSA strains (3, 9, 11, 24, 28, 29, 30,
36-38), including some GISA isolates (8, 32).
However, such findings have usually been observed either for very few
of the antibiotic combinations (sometimes only one) tested or for a few
strains and thus deserve to be confirmed in larger studies.
-lactams and among 8 aminoglycosides those that
display the strongest beneficial bacteriostatic effect in combination
with vancomycin against MRSA strains; (ii) to evaluate the bactericidal
effects displayed by the most effective agents used in different
-lactam-vancomycin, vancomycin-aminoglycoside and
-lactam-vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations; and (iii) to
examine whether the effects of the different antibiotic combinations are dependent upon the aminoglycoside susceptibility pattern of the strains.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C and subcultured to ensure
purity before testing.
Media and antibiotics. Mueller-Hinton broth and agar (Becton-Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Chaix, France) and tryptic soy (TS) agar supplemented or not supplemented with blood (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) were used. All incubations were at 37°C for 24 h. The following antibiotics were kindly provided by the manufacturers: imipenem (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Paris, France), cefazolin (Panpharma S.A., Fougères, France), vancomycin (Eli Lilly & Co., Saint-Cloud, France), and netilmicin (Schering Plough, Levallois-Perret, France).
Screening for the
-lactam and for the aminoglycoside showing
the best beneficial effect in combination with vancomycin.
A
one-disk diffusion technique previously described (27) was
used to assess the effects of
-lactam-vancomycin and
vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations against all of the 32 MRSA
strains tested. Mueller-Hinton agar plates with or without vancomycin
at one-fourth of the MIC were flooded with a bacterial suspension of
1.5 × 106 CFU/ml. Twenty-six disks each impregnated
with a
-lactam (Bio-Rad) and 8 disks impregnated with an
aminoglycoside were placed on top of the agar plates. For each strain,
the inhibition zone around the disks in the absence and in the presence
of vancomycin in agar plates was compared as described below. An
initial score (S1) was established according to the inhibition zone on
the plate without vancomycin to take into account the original
susceptibility of the strain to the antibiotic tested. This
inhibition zone was interpreted as described by the Comité de
l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de
Microbiologie (10). S1 was 0 when the strain was resistant
to the antibiotic tested, 1 when it was intermediate, and 2 when it was
susceptible. A second score (S2) was determined by comparison of
inhibition zones in the presence or absence of vancomycin; S2 was 0 in
the absence of an increase in the diameter of the inhibition zone, 1 when the zone was increased but the strain remained in the same
category, 2 when the strain changed by one category (i.e., moving from
resistant to intermediate [R
I] or from intermediate to susceptible
[I
S]), and 3 when the zone was increased so that the strain
changed by two categories (R
S). Lastly, depending upon the addition
of these two scores (S3), the beneficial bacteriostatic effect was
defined as absent (S3 = 0), weak (S3 = 1), moderate (S3 = 2), or strong (S3 = 3).
Susceptibility testing and checkerboard studies. The MICs of cefazolin, imipenem, netilmicin, and vancomycin were determined by the agar dilution method in accordance with standard guidelines (10, 23). The replicator prong delivered approximately 104 CFU per spot (34). The MICs were interpreted in accordance with the recommendations of the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (10).
Studies of activities of two-drug combinations comprising vancomycin and either a
-lactam (cefazolin or imipenem) or netilmicin were
performed by the checkerboard agar dilution method (12) to
obtain a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The media,
inocula, and conditions were the same as those used for MIC tests.
Effects were interpreted as synergistic when FIC indexes were
0.5,
indifferent when values were >0.5 to 4.0, and antagonistic when values
were >4.0 (12).
Killing studies.
Killing experiments were performed to
evaluate the bactericidal activities of two-drug and three-drug
combinations of antibiotics, including a
-lactam (imipenem or
cefazolin) and/or netilmicin and vancomycin, against 10 of the 32 MRSA
strains studied. The 10 strains tested were chosen according to their
aminoglycoside susceptibility patterns and consisted of 4 strains with
the Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype, 4 strains with the Kmr Tmr phenotype, and 2 strains susceptible to aminoglycosides.
3-log10 decrease in the starting inoculum
after 24 h of incubation. Synergy was defined as a
2-log10 decrease in the number of CFU per milliliter
between the combination and its most active single component after a
24-h incubation period, and the number of surviving organisms in the
presence of the combination had to be
2 log10 CFU/ml
below the starting inoculum (12). Antagonism was defined as
a
2-log10 increase in the number of CFU per milliliter
between the combination and the most active single antimicrobial agent. Indifference was defined as an increase or a decrease in killing of
less than 100-fold at 24 h with the combination compared with the
most active agent used alone.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Screening for the
-lactam and the aminoglycoside showing
the strongest beneficial bacteriostatic effect in combination with
vancomycin.
As shown in Table 1, the
beneficial bacteriostatic effects of
-lactam-vancomycin
combinations were variable, depending on the
-lactam tested. The
-lactams which exhibited a strong beneficial effect against a high
percentage of strains when combined with vancomycin were meropenem
(66% of strains), ampicillin-sulbactam (62%), cefazolin (60%), and
to a lesser extent imipenem, cefoxitin, and cefotiam (56% for each).
Among these agents, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, and imipenem were
those providing a moderate or strong beneficial effect against the most
strains. Among these three drugs, cefazolin and imipenem, whose
pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic indications are
markedly different, were both retained for the subsequent
bacteriostatic and bactericidal studies.
|
|
MIC determinations and checkerboard studies.
The
characteristics of the 32 MRSA strains tested are shown in Table
3. The MICs of the antibiotics studied
for 90% of the 32 MRSA strains tested were as follows: cefazolin, 256 µg/ml; imipenem, 64 µg/ml; netilmicin, 16 µg/ml; vancomycin, 4 µg/ml. On the basis of the MICs, 15 strains appeared susceptible to
cefazolin and 17 appeared susceptible to imipenem. Seventeen of the 32 MRSA strains were susceptible to netilmicin, 9 were intermediate, and 6 were resistant at a low level (MIC, 16 or 32 mg/liter). All of the
strains were susceptible to vancomycin.
|
0.25 occurred with strains for which the imipenem MICs
were
32 µg/ml. The mean antibiotic concentrations at which FIC
indexes were calculated for both combinations were as follows: 7.4 and
0.41 mg/liter for cefazolin and vancomycin, respectively, and 0.19 and
0.24 mg/liter for imipenem and vancomycin, respectively. In contrast,
the vancomycin-netilmicin combination exhibited indifferent effects
against all of the 32 MRSA strains studied. FIC indexes of 1.0 to 1.5 were observed with all strains but one. The mean antibiotic
concentrations at which FIC indexes were calculated were 0.3 mg/liter
for vancomycin and 3.6 mg/liter for netilmicin.
|
Killing studies.
The rates of killing of the 10 strains by
antibiotics used alone or in double or triple combinations, determined
at one-half of the MIC, are presented in Table
5. At this concentration, none of the
monotherapies tested produced bactericidal effects after 24 h,
except vancomycin against strain 4. It is noteworthy that vancomycin
alone produced a >2-log10 reduction in the counts of three
additional strains. Regimens of netilmicin combined with either
vancomycin or a
-lactam (cefazolin or imipenem) were infrequently or
never bactericidal. In contrast, regimens consisting of imipenem or
cefazolin plus vancomycin were bactericidal after 24 h against 6 and 5 of the 10 strains studied, respectively, and were often synergistic. Both
-lactam-vancomycin combinations were bactericidal against all of the strains harboring the Kmr
Tmr Gmr phenotype, while only the
imipenem-vancomycin combination produced a bactericidal effect against
one strain with the Kmr Tmr phenotype. It is
noteworthy that all cases but one of the absence of a bactericidal
effect of the
-lactam-vancomycin regimen occured with strains for
which FIC indexes of
0.5 was calculated. The addition of netilmicin
markedly enhanced the killing activity of the combinations of cefazolin
or imipenem plus vancomycin, but only for three of the four MRSA
strains against which the
-lactam-vancomycin combinations failed to
produce a bactericidal effect. It is noteworthy that these strains (no.
21, 22, 27, and 30) were both susceptible to netilmicin and
heterogeneously resistant to methicillin. As a result, the three-drug
combinations each demonstrated a bactericidal effect against 8 of the
10 strains studied. The imipenem-vancomycin-netilmicin combination
produced a greater bacterial count reduction and was more frequently
synergistic than the cefazolin-vancomycin-netilmicin regimen.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we analyzed the activities of 8 aminoglycoside-vancomycin and 26
-lactam-vancomycin combinations
against a set of 32 clinical MRSA strains. This represents 1,088 individual analyses, a work which would have been tremendously
laborious with conventional methods for the study of antibiotic
combinations such as checkerboard synergy testing. To circumvent such
technical problems, we used a previously described disk diffusion
method (27) that is easy to perform, reproducible, and
easier to interpret than the double-disk potentiation methods
(8). Compared with our original description (27),
the calculation of the final score that analyzes the beneficial
bacteriostatic effect observed was slightly modified to take into
account the intrinsic
-lactam activity against MRSA isolates.
Among the eight aminoglycosides tested, netilmicin was considered the best agent to combine with vancomycin, frequently showing a moderate or strong beneficial bacteriostatic effect, particularly against strains with a Kmr Tmr phenotype and, interestingly, even against those with a Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype (data not shown), despite the cross-resistance between gentamicin and netilmicin.
The screening test also revealed that most
-lactam-vancomycin
combinations exhibited a beneficial effect against MRSA strains and
that the
-lactams most often demonstrating a moderate or strong
beneficial effect were ampicillin-sulbactam, imipenem, and cefazolin.
This may be related to the binding affinities of these three
-lactams for penicillin-binding protein 2a of MRSA, which are
stronger than that of methicillin and allow the classification of these
three agents among the
-lactam antibiotics most active against MRSA
in vitro (6, 7). Using a similar screening test, Climo et
al. (8) recently reported a synergistic bacteriostatic effect of a combination of vancomycin and either oxacillin,
ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefpodoxime, or amoxicillin-clavulanate
against three clinical GISA isolates.
The favorable bacteriostatic effect of the imipenem- or
cefazolin-vancomycin combinations was also demonstrated by the
checkerboard studies. The concentrations at which synergism was
observed were easily clinically achievable with both combinations. It
is noteworthy that the imipenem-vancomycin regimen produced the best
results, in terms of both FIC values and the antibiotic concentrations generating bacteriostatic synergy. By checkerboard studies, synergistic bacteriostatic effects of
-lactam-vancomycin combinations against MRSA have been previously reported for imipenem and cephalosporins such
as cefotiam, cefoperazone, and cefpirome (3, 9, 30, 35, 36),
but not for oxacillin (8). However, unlike our results, the
synergistic FIC values usually observed in such studies were frequently
high, close to the 0.5 limit value for synergy (9, 30).
In contrast, the combination of vancomycin with netilmicin resulted in an indifferent effect, even against MRSA strains susceptible to netilmicin. Such results are in accordance with recent studies performed with gentamicin (17, 18) or netilmicin; D. Ince and H. Eraksoy, 8th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis., abstr. 12.038, p. 20, 1998).
The potential bactericidal effects of double or triple combinations
including a
-lactam (imipenem or cefazolin) and/or vancomycin and/or
netilmicin were further evaluated by killing experiments with 10 strains. The antibiotics were tested at one-half of the MICs to improve
the detection of synergy (12) and also to reflect clinical
conditions. As expected from the antibiotic concentrations used in
these experiments, the monotherapies and the
-lactam-netilmicin combinations generally failed to produce bactericidal effects after
24 h. The bacterial count reductions sometimes observed in broth
with vancomycin alone were maybe related to a lack of accuracy of the
vancomycin MICs, which were determined by agar and not by broth dilution.
As expected from the high FIC indexes, the vancomycin-netilmicin combination was found to be poorly active against the MRSA strains studied, whatever their aminoglycoside susceptibility pattern. Previous studies examining the bactericidal activity of vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations against MRSA most of the time tested gentamicin instead of netilmicin, but their authors globally reported similar indifferent results (22; Ince and Eraksoy, 8th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis.). Synergism was shown not to be predictable from the aminoglycoside MIC (22). On the other hand, some studies have reported that gentamicin (14, 17) or netilmicin (26) can enhance the bactericidal activity of vancomycin but these results were observed at inhibitory antibiotic concentrations and against only one to three strains.
The most interesting results of our study are the frequent and strong
bactericidal effects of the
-lactam (cefazolin or
imipenem)-vancomycin combination and, moreover, of the
-lactam-vancomycin-netilmicin combination. The results of our
bitherapies compared favorably with those of previous works evaluating
the killing activity of combinations of vancomycin and either cefotiam
(35) or cefpirome (29) against MRSA: for the
cefotiam-vancomycin combination, only a weak synergistic bacteriostatic
effect was reported; for the cefpirome-vancomycin regimen, the
bactericidal effect at 24 h was observed only against the two
strains homogeneously resistant to methicillin. In a previous work
performed with a single MRSA strain (36), the bactericidal
effect of the imipenem-vancomycin combination has been reported to be
dependent on the imipenem concentration.
To our knowledge, this is the first work studying the efficacy of
triple combinations of a
-lactam, a glycopeptide, and an aminoglycoside against MRSA strains. For the strains both homogeneously resistant to
-lactams and resistant to netilmicin, the triple combinations had no advantage over the
-lactam-vancomycin
combinations in terms of bactericidal effect. For four of the six
strains both heterogeneously resistant to methicillin and susceptible
to netilmicin, the
-lactam-vancomycin combinations failed to
provide a bactericidal effect, probably because of the heterogeneous
methicillin resistance. As expected for these strains, the addition of
netilmicin markedly increased the killing effects of the
-lactam-vancomycin combinations, except for one strain. However, as
all of the four Kmr Tmr Gmr strains
tested were homogeneously resistant to methicillin and all of the four
Kmr Tmr strains were heterogeneously resistant,
these results do not allow determination of what is significant in the
phenotype of the strains to predict the bactericidal effects of the combinations.
In conclusion, this study shows that vancomycin combined with imipenem
or cefazolin, and even with netilmicin in a triple combination
(depending on the aminoglycoside susceptibility pattern of the
strains), at subinhibitory concentrations can be bactericidal after
24 h at higher rates than vancomycin-netilmicin. Further studies
are needed before generalizing the concept of the usefulness of adding
a
-lactam such as imipenem or cefazolin, and potentially an
aminoglycoside such as netilmicin, to vancomycin for the treatment of
MRSA infections. Interestingly, the choice between cefazolin and
imipenem could be based on in vitro tests but also on the clinical
context: cefazolin in cases of proven monomicrobial infection due to
MRSA and imipenem in cases of suspected or proven mixed infections.
Lastly, the recent description of synergistic activities of different
-lactams and vancomycin against some GISA isolates (8,
32) indicates that further studies in this field are warranted.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
We gratefully thank Noële Barbier-Frébourg for interest and for help with the mecA PCR.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Charles Nicolle, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. Phone: 33 2 32 88 80 52. Fax: 33 2 32 88 80 24. E-mail: Martine.Pestel-Caron{at}chu-rouen.fr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ackerman, B. H.,
A. M. Vannier, and E. B. Eudy.
1992.
Analysis of vancomycin time-kill studies with Staphylococcus species by using a curve stripping program to describe the relationship between concentration and pharmacodynamic response.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:1766-1769 |
| 2. |
Barbier-Frebourg, N.,
D. Nouet,
L. Lemée,
E. Martin, and J.-F. Lemeland.
1998.
Comparison of ATB Staph, Rapid ATB Staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:52-57 |
| 3. | Barr, J. G., E. T. M. Smyth, and G. M. Hogg. 1990. In vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem in combination with vancomycin or teicoplanin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9:804-809[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin United States, 1997.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
46:765-766[Medline]. (Erratum, 46:851, 1997.)
|
| 5. |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin United States, 1997.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
46:813-815[Medline]. (Erratum, 46:851, 1997.)
|
| 6. |
Chambers, H. F.
1988.
Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
1:173-186 |
| 7. |
Chambers, H. F., and M. Sachdeva.
1990.
Binding of -lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Infect. Dis.
161:1170-1176[Medline].
|
| 8. |
Climo, M. W.,
R. L. Patron, and G. L. Archer.
1999.
Combinations of vancomycin and -lactams are synergistic against staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:1747-1753.
|
| 9. | Çokça, F., D. Arman, and G. Altay. 1998. In vitro activity of vancomycin combined with rifampin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin or imipenem against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4:657-659[Medline]. |
| 10. | Comité de l'antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. 1996. Report of the comité de l'antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2:S1-S49. |
| 11. |
Debbia, E.,
P. E. Varaldo, and G. C. Schito.
1986.
In vitro activity of imipenem against enterococci and staphylococci and evidence for high rates of synergism with teicoplanin, fosfomycin, and rifampin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
30:813-815 |
| 12. | Eliopoulos, G. M., and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 1996. Antimicrobial combinations, p. 330-396. In V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 4th ed. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md. |
| 13. |
Fraise, A. P.
1998.
Guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
42:287-289 |
| 14. |
Hershberger, E.,
J. R. Aeschlimann,
T. Moldovan, and M. J. Rybak.
1999.
Evaluation of bactericidal activities of LY333328, vancomycin, teicoplanin, ampicillin-sulbactam, trovafloxacin, and RP59500 alone or in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against different strains of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus by time-kill curve methods.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:717-721 |
| 15. | Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. |
Hiramatsu, K.,
H. Hanaki,
T. Ino,
K. Yabuta,
T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover.
1997.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
40:135-136 |
| 17. | Houlihan, H. H., R. C. Mercier, and M. J. Rybak. 1997. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin alone and in combination with gentamicin at various dosing intervals against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected fibrin-platelet clots in an in vitro infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2497-2501[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Kang, S. L., and M. J. Rybak.
1997.
In-vitro bactericidal activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin alone and in combination against resistant strains of Enterococcus species and Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
39(Suppl. A):33-39 |
| 19. | Levine, D. P., B. S. Fromm, and B. R. Reddy. 1991. Slow response to vancomycin or vancomycin plus rifampin in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Ann. Intern. Med. 115:674-680. |
| 20. | Michel, M., and L. Gutmann. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: therapeutic realities and possibilities. Lancet 349:1901-1906[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Miller, G. H., F. J. Sabatelli, R. S. Hare, and J. A. Waltz. 1980. Survey of aminoglycoside resistance patterns. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 21:91-104. |
| 22. | Mulazimoglu, L., S. D. Drenning, and R. R. Muder. 1996. Vancomycin-gentamicin synergism revisited: effect of gentamicin susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1534-1535[Abstract]. |
| 23. | National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7 A4 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. |
| 24. |
Palmer, S. M., and M. J. Rybak.
1997.
An evaluation of the bactericidal activity of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem or nafcillin alone and in combination with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in time-kill curves with infected fibrin clots.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
39:515-518 |
| 25. |
Pearson, R. D.,
R. T. Steigbigel,
H. T. Davis, and S. W. Chapman.
1980.
Method for reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
18:699-708 |
| 26. | Perdikaris, G., H. Giamarellou, A. Pefanis, I. Donta, and P. Karayiannakos. 1995. Vancomycin or vancomycin plus netilmicin for methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2289-2294[Abstract]. |
| 27. |
Pestel, M.,
E. Martin,
C. Aucouturier,
J. F. Lemeland, and F. Caron.
1995.
In vitro interactions between different -lactam antibiotics and fosfomycin against bloodstream isolates of enterococci.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:2341-2344[Abstract].
|
| 28. | Portier, H., A. Kasmierczak, F. Lucht, J. C. Tremeaux, P. Chavanet, and J. M. Duez. 1985. Cefotaxime in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of severe methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Infection 13(Suppl. 1):S123-S128. |
| 29. |
Raymond, J.,
G. Vedel, and M. Bergeret.
1996.
In-vitro bactericidal activity of cefpirome in combination with vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
38:1067-1071 |
| 30. | Seibert, G., D. Isert, N. Klesel, M. Limbert, A. Markus, and E. Schrinner. 1992. The in-vitro antibacterial activity of a combination of cefpirome or cefoperazone with vancomycin against enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 29(Suppl. A):25-30. |
| 31. |
Shaw, K. J.,
P. N. Rather,
R. S. Hare, and G. H. Miller.
1993.
Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes.
Microbiol. Rev.
57:138-163 |
| 32. |
Sieradzki, K.,
R. B. Roberts,
S. W. Haber, and A. Tomasz.
1999.
The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.
N. Engl. J. Med.
340:517-523 |
| 33. |
Small, P. M., and H. F. Chambers.
1990.
Vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in intravenous drug users.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:1227-1231 |
| 34. | Steers, D., E. L. Foltz, B. S. Gravies, and J. Rindel. 1959. An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Antibiot. Chemother. (Basel) 9:307-311. |
| 35. |
Sugiura, A.,
K. Kono,
T. Kono, and E. Higashide.
1991.
The effect of combinations of cefotiam and other antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
28:707-717 |
| 36. |
Totsuka, K.,
M. Shiseki,
K. Kikuchi, and Y. Matsui.
1999.
Combined effects of vancomycin and imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro and in vivo.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
44:455-460 |
| 37. |
Watanakunakorn, C., and J. C. Tisone.
1982.
Synergism between vancomycin and gentamicin or tobramycin for methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
22:903-905 |
| 38. | Wise, R., J. P. Ashby, and J. M. Andrews. 1989. The antibacterial activity of meropenem in combination with gentamicin or vancomycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 24(Suppl. A):233-238. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»