This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rochon-Edouard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rochon-Edouard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3055-3060, Vol. 44, No. 11
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Synergistic Effects of Double and Triple Combinations of beta -Lactams, Vancomycin, and Netilmicin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains

Stéphanie Rochon-Edouard, Martine Pestel-Caron,* Jean-François Lemeland, and François Caron

Groupe de Recherche sur les Antimicrobiens et les Micro-organismes (GRAM, EA 2656), 76031 Rouen, France

Received 2 March 2000/Returned for modification 1 July 2000/Accepted 24 August 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Several studies have previously reported synergistic effects between vancomycin and a given beta -lactam or a given aminoglycoside against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. The aim of our study was to exhaustively compare the effects of different combinations of a beta -lactam, vancomycin, and/or an aminoglycoside against 32 clinical MRSA strains with different aminoglycoside susceptibility patterns. The effects of 26 different beta -lactam-vancomycin and 8 different aminoglycoside-vancomycin combinations were first studied using a disk diffusion screening method. The best interactions with vancomycin were observed with either imipenem, cefazolin, or netilmicin. By checkerboard studies, imipenem-vancomycin and cefazolin-vancomycin each provided a synergistic bacteriostatic effect against 22 strains; the mean fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indexes were 0.35 and 0.46 for imipenem-vancomycin and cefazolin-vancomycin, respectively. The vancomycin-netilmicin combination provided an indifferent effect against all of the 32 strains tested; the mean of FIC index was 1.096. The mean concentrations of imipenem, cefazolin, netilmicin, and vancomycin at which FIC indexes were calculated were clinically achievable. Killing experiments were then performed using imipenem, cefazolin, netilmicin, and vancomycin at one-half of the MIC, alone and in different combinations, against 10 strains. The vancomycin-netilmicin regimen was rarely bactericidal, even against strains susceptible to netilmicin. The imipenem-vancomycin and cefazolin-vancomycin combinations were strongly bactericidal against six and five strains, respectively. The addition of netilmicin markedly enhanced the killing activity of the combination of cefazolin or imipenem plus vancomycin, but only for the MRSA strains against which the beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations had no bactericidal effect. It is noteworthy that the latter strains were both susceptible to netilmicin and heterogeneously resistant to methicillin.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains represent a worldwide threat because of their virulence and their broad distribution in the hospital setting. Moreover, the MRSA strains are often resistant not only to beta -lactam agents but also to fluoroquinolones, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides (20). Vancomycin is almost universally accepted as the drug of choice for the treatment of MRSA infections (13, 20). However, vancomycin used alone kills staphylococci slowly (1), resulting in delayed recovery of patients with life-threatening infections (19, 33). In addition, clinicians now have to face the emergence of strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, i.e., so-called glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) (4, 5, 15, 16). Therefore, there is clearly a need for new antibiotic regimens with strong early bactericidal activity against MRSA. In this field, an alternative to the development of new classes of agents could be the use of combinations of well-known compounds. Some investigators have reported synergistic bacteriostatic and bactericidal (where tested) effects of different beta -lactams or different aminoglycosides combined with vancomycin against MRSA strains (3, 9, 11, 24, 28, 29, 30, 36-38), including some GISA isolates (8, 32). However, such findings have usually been observed either for very few of the antibiotic combinations (sometimes only one) tested or for a few strains and thus deserve to be confirmed in larger studies.

The purposes of this investigation were (i) to determine among 26 commonly available beta -lactams and among 8 aminoglycosides those that display the strongest beneficial bacteriostatic effect in combination with vancomycin against MRSA strains; (ii) to evaluate the bactericidal effects displayed by the most effective agents used in different beta -lactam-vancomycin, vancomycin-aminoglycoside and beta -lactam-vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations; and (iii) to examine whether the effects of the different antibiotic combinations are dependent upon the aminoglycoside susceptibility pattern of the strains.

(Part of this work was presented at the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [abstr. E58, p. 185], San Diego, Calif., September 1998.)


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacterial strains. A total of 32 clinical MRSA strains selected from 32 individual patients attending the Rouen University Hospital between 1995 and 1997 were studied. Twenty-eight isolates were obtained from blood, two were from pleural fluid, one was from pericardial fluid, and one was from joint fluid. They were identified to the species level by conventional methods (colony morphology, Gram stain characteristics, coagulase reactions). All strains were methicillin resistant, as determined by a disk diffusion method with a 5-µg oxacillin disk (10) and by PCR amplification of the mecA gene (2). Strains were considered heterogeneously resistant to methicillin when partial growth within the inhibition zone or the presence of microcolonies around the oxacillin disk was observed. None of the 32 strains had reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. The study population was chosen according to the strains' patterns of susceptibility to aminoglycosides as determined by a disk diffusion technique described by the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (10). The aminoglycoside resistance mechanism was determined after applying the aminoglycoside resistance pattern to 12 aminoglycosides by a disk susceptibility test described by Miller et al. (21). Seventeen strains seemed to produce a bifunctional [AAC(6') + APH(2")] enzyme associated with ANT(4') (4 strains) or with APH(3') (13 strains), and 10 seemed to produce the ANT(4') enzyme alone. The production of the two enzyme combinations cited above notably confers resistance to kanamycin, tobramycin, and gentamicin (i.e., a Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype), whereas production of the ANT(4') enzyme alone determines resistance to kanamycin and tobramycin (i.e., a Kmr Tmr phenotype) (31). The five remaining strains were susceptible to aminoglycosides.

Strain ATCC 43300 was used as a reference control strain. Strains were stored frozen in glycerol broth at -70°C and subcultured to ensure purity before testing.

Media and antibiotics. Mueller-Hinton broth and agar (Becton-Dickinson, Le Pont-de-Chaix, France) and tryptic soy (TS) agar supplemented or not supplemented with blood (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) were used. All incubations were at 37°C for 24 h. The following antibiotics were kindly provided by the manufacturers: imipenem (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Paris, France), cefazolin (Panpharma S.A., Fougères, France), vancomycin (Eli Lilly & Co., Saint-Cloud, France), and netilmicin (Schering Plough, Levallois-Perret, France).

Screening for the beta -lactam and for the aminoglycoside showing the best beneficial effect in combination with vancomycin. A one-disk diffusion technique previously described (27) was used to assess the effects of beta -lactam-vancomycin and vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations against all of the 32 MRSA strains tested. Mueller-Hinton agar plates with or without vancomycin at one-fourth of the MIC were flooded with a bacterial suspension of 1.5 × 106 CFU/ml. Twenty-six disks each impregnated with a beta -lactam (Bio-Rad) and 8 disks impregnated with an aminoglycoside were placed on top of the agar plates. For each strain, the inhibition zone around the disks in the absence and in the presence of vancomycin in agar plates was compared as described below. An initial score (S1) was established according to the inhibition zone on the plate without vancomycin to take into account the original susceptibility of the strain to the antibiotic tested. This inhibition zone was interpreted as described by the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (10). S1 was 0 when the strain was resistant to the antibiotic tested, 1 when it was intermediate, and 2 when it was susceptible. A second score (S2) was determined by comparison of inhibition zones in the presence or absence of vancomycin; S2 was 0 in the absence of an increase in the diameter of the inhibition zone, 1 when the zone was increased but the strain remained in the same category, 2 when the strain changed by one category (i.e., moving from resistant to intermediate [Rright-arrowI] or from intermediate to susceptible [Iright-arrowS]), and 3 when the zone was increased so that the strain changed by two categories (Rright-arrowS). Lastly, depending upon the addition of these two scores (S3), the beneficial bacteriostatic effect was defined as absent (S3 = 0), weak (S3 = 1), moderate (S3 = 2), or strong (S3 = 3).

Because of the favorable results described below, cefazolin, imipenem, and netilmicin were chosen for the subsequent studies.

Susceptibility testing and checkerboard studies. The MICs of cefazolin, imipenem, netilmicin, and vancomycin were determined by the agar dilution method in accordance with standard guidelines (10, 23). The replicator prong delivered approximately 104 CFU per spot (34). The MICs were interpreted in accordance with the recommendations of the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (10).

Studies of activities of two-drug combinations comprising vancomycin and either a beta -lactam (cefazolin or imipenem) or netilmicin were performed by the checkerboard agar dilution method (12) to obtain a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The media, inocula, and conditions were the same as those used for MIC tests. Effects were interpreted as synergistic when FIC indexes were <= 0.5, indifferent when values were >0.5 to 4.0, and antagonistic when values were >4.0 (12).

Killing studies. Killing experiments were performed to evaluate the bactericidal activities of two-drug and three-drug combinations of antibiotics, including a beta -lactam (imipenem or cefazolin) and/or netilmicin and vancomycin, against 10 of the 32 MRSA strains studied. The 10 strains tested were chosen according to their aminoglycoside susceptibility patterns and consisted of 4 strains with the Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype, 4 strains with the Kmr Tmr phenotype, and 2 strains susceptible to aminoglycosides.

Each antibiotic was tested alone and in combination at one-half of the MIC. The final concentration of the log-phase inocula was approximately 106 CFU/ml. All experiments were performed in duplicate on different days to ensure reproducibility. Viability counts were done at 24 h after incubation at 37°C by plating 25 µl of serial dilutions from each tube onto TS blood agar plates (12). The numbers of viable bacteria were counted after 24 and 48 h of incubation of the plates at 37°C. The detection limit was 40 CFU/ml. In preliminary experiments, antibiotic carryover was ruled out by plating samples of a bacterial suspension containing 103 to 104 CFU/ml in the presence or absence of antibiotics alone or in combination (12, 25). Bactericidal activity was defined as a >= 3-log10 decrease in the starting inoculum after 24 h of incubation. Synergy was defined as a >= 2-log10 decrease in the number of CFU per milliliter between the combination and its most active single component after a 24-h incubation period, and the number of surviving organisms in the presence of the combination had to be >= 2 log10 CFU/ml below the starting inoculum (12). Antagonism was defined as a >= 2-log10 increase in the number of CFU per milliliter between the combination and the most active single antimicrobial agent. Indifference was defined as an increase or a decrease in killing of less than 100-fold at 24 h with the combination compared with the most active agent used alone.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Screening for the beta -lactam and the aminoglycoside showing the strongest beneficial bacteriostatic effect in combination with vancomycin. As shown in Table 1, the beneficial bacteriostatic effects of beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations were variable, depending on the beta -lactam tested. The beta -lactams which exhibited a strong beneficial effect against a high percentage of strains when combined with vancomycin were meropenem (66% of strains), ampicillin-sulbactam (62%), cefazolin (60%), and to a lesser extent imipenem, cefoxitin, and cefotiam (56% for each). Among these agents, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, and imipenem were those providing a moderate or strong beneficial effect against the most strains. Among these three drugs, cefazolin and imipenem, whose pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic indications are markedly different, were both retained for the subsequent bacteriostatic and bactericidal studies.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Beneficial bacteriostatic effects of different beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations against 32 MRSA strains

As shown in Table 2, for most of the 32 strains, no or a weak beneficial bacteriostatic effect was demonstrated with the vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations, except with netilmicin, amikacin, dibekacin, gentamicin, and streptomycin, which frequently displayed a moderate effect. Netilmicin was considered the aminoglycoside showing the best effect, as it was the one providing a strong beneficial effect against the most strains. It is noteworthy that of the 88% of the strains tested against which the vancomycin-netilmicin combination produced a strong or moderate beneficial bacteriostatic effect, 46% harbored the Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Beneficial bacteriostatic effects of different aminoglycoside-vancomycin combinations against 32 MRSA strains

MIC determinations and checkerboard studies. The characteristics of the 32 MRSA strains tested are shown in Table 3. The MICs of the antibiotics studied for 90% of the 32 MRSA strains tested were as follows: cefazolin, 256 µg/ml; imipenem, 64 µg/ml; netilmicin, 16 µg/ml; vancomycin, 4 µg/ml. On the basis of the MICs, 15 strains appeared susceptible to cefazolin and 17 appeared susceptible to imipenem. Seventeen of the 32 MRSA strains were susceptible to netilmicin, 9 were intermediate, and 6 were resistant at a low level (MIC, 16 or 32 mg/liter). All of the strains were susceptible to vancomycin.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Descriptions of the 32 strains studied

The results of checkerboard studies of the cefazolin-vancomycin, imipenem-vancomycin, and vancomycin-netilmicin combinations are indicated in Tables 3 and 4. The effects of the cefazolin-vancomycin and imipenem-vancomycin combinations were indifferent (with FIC indexes between 0.5 and 1) against 31% (10 isolates) and synergistic against 69% (22 isolates) of the MRSA strains. For 13 of these 22 isolates, FIC indexes of <0.25 were seen with the imipenem-vancomycin combination while no such low FIC indexes were calculated for the cefazolin-vancomycin combination. Antagonistic FIC values for both combinations were not observed with any of the strains. The FIC indexes of the imipenem-vancomycin combination were inversely correlated with the MICs of imipenem, i.e., most cases of FIC indexes of <= 0.25 occurred with strains for which the imipenem MICs were >= 32 µg/ml. The mean antibiotic concentrations at which FIC indexes were calculated for both combinations were as follows: 7.4 and 0.41 mg/liter for cefazolin and vancomycin, respectively, and 0.19 and 0.24 mg/liter for imipenem and vancomycin, respectively. In contrast, the vancomycin-netilmicin combination exhibited indifferent effects against all of the 32 MRSA strains studied. FIC indexes of 1.0 to 1.5 were observed with all strains but one. The mean antibiotic concentrations at which FIC indexes were calculated were 0.3 mg/liter for vancomycin and 3.6 mg/liter for netilmicin.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   FIC indexes of beta -lactam-vancomycin and vancomycin-netilmicin combinations for 32 MRSA strains

Killing studies. The rates of killing of the 10 strains by antibiotics used alone or in double or triple combinations, determined at one-half of the MIC, are presented in Table 5. At this concentration, none of the monotherapies tested produced bactericidal effects after 24 h, except vancomycin against strain 4. It is noteworthy that vancomycin alone produced a >2-log10 reduction in the counts of three additional strains. Regimens of netilmicin combined with either vancomycin or a beta -lactam (cefazolin or imipenem) were infrequently or never bactericidal. In contrast, regimens consisting of imipenem or cefazolin plus vancomycin were bactericidal after 24 h against 6 and 5 of the 10 strains studied, respectively, and were often synergistic. Both beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations were bactericidal against all of the strains harboring the Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype, while only the imipenem-vancomycin combination produced a bactericidal effect against one strain with the Kmr Tmr phenotype. It is noteworthy that all cases but one of the absence of a bactericidal effect of the beta -lactam-vancomycin regimen occured with strains for which FIC indexes of >= 0.5 was calculated. The addition of netilmicin markedly enhanced the killing activity of the combinations of cefazolin or imipenem plus vancomycin, but only for three of the four MRSA strains against which the beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations failed to produce a bactericidal effect. It is noteworthy that these strains (no. 21, 22, 27, and 30) were both susceptible to netilmicin and heterogeneously resistant to methicillin. As a result, the three-drug combinations each demonstrated a bactericidal effect against 8 of the 10 strains studied. The imipenem-vancomycin-netilmicin combination produced a greater bacterial count reduction and was more frequently synergistic than the cefazolin-vancomycin-netilmicin regimen.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Killing activities of imipenem, cefazolin, vancomycin, and netilmicin alone and in double or triple combinations against 10 MRSA strains after 24 h of incubation


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In this study, we analyzed the activities of 8 aminoglycoside-vancomycin and 26 beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations against a set of 32 clinical MRSA strains. This represents 1,088 individual analyses, a work which would have been tremendously laborious with conventional methods for the study of antibiotic combinations such as checkerboard synergy testing. To circumvent such technical problems, we used a previously described disk diffusion method (27) that is easy to perform, reproducible, and easier to interpret than the double-disk potentiation methods (8). Compared with our original description (27), the calculation of the final score that analyzes the beneficial bacteriostatic effect observed was slightly modified to take into account the intrinsic beta -lactam activity against MRSA isolates.

Among the eight aminoglycosides tested, netilmicin was considered the best agent to combine with vancomycin, frequently showing a moderate or strong beneficial bacteriostatic effect, particularly against strains with a Kmr Tmr phenotype and, interestingly, even against those with a Kmr Tmr Gmr phenotype (data not shown), despite the cross-resistance between gentamicin and netilmicin.

The screening test also revealed that most beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations exhibited a beneficial effect against MRSA strains and that the beta -lactams most often demonstrating a moderate or strong beneficial effect were ampicillin-sulbactam, imipenem, and cefazolin. This may be related to the binding affinities of these three beta -lactams for penicillin-binding protein 2a of MRSA, which are stronger than that of methicillin and allow the classification of these three agents among the beta -lactam antibiotics most active against MRSA in vitro (6, 7). Using a similar screening test, Climo et al. (8) recently reported a synergistic bacteriostatic effect of a combination of vancomycin and either oxacillin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefpodoxime, or amoxicillin-clavulanate against three clinical GISA isolates.

The favorable bacteriostatic effect of the imipenem- or cefazolin-vancomycin combinations was also demonstrated by the checkerboard studies. The concentrations at which synergism was observed were easily clinically achievable with both combinations. It is noteworthy that the imipenem-vancomycin regimen produced the best results, in terms of both FIC values and the antibiotic concentrations generating bacteriostatic synergy. By checkerboard studies, synergistic bacteriostatic effects of beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations against MRSA have been previously reported for imipenem and cephalosporins such as cefotiam, cefoperazone, and cefpirome (3, 9, 30, 35, 36), but not for oxacillin (8). However, unlike our results, the synergistic FIC values usually observed in such studies were frequently high, close to the 0.5 limit value for synergy (9, 30).

In contrast, the combination of vancomycin with netilmicin resulted in an indifferent effect, even against MRSA strains susceptible to netilmicin. Such results are in accordance with recent studies performed with gentamicin (17, 18) or netilmicin; D. Ince and H. Eraksoy, 8th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis., abstr. 12.038, p. 20, 1998).

The potential bactericidal effects of double or triple combinations including a beta -lactam (imipenem or cefazolin) and/or vancomycin and/or netilmicin were further evaluated by killing experiments with 10 strains. The antibiotics were tested at one-half of the MICs to improve the detection of synergy (12) and also to reflect clinical conditions. As expected from the antibiotic concentrations used in these experiments, the monotherapies and the beta -lactam-netilmicin combinations generally failed to produce bactericidal effects after 24 h. The bacterial count reductions sometimes observed in broth with vancomycin alone were maybe related to a lack of accuracy of the vancomycin MICs, which were determined by agar and not by broth dilution.

As expected from the high FIC indexes, the vancomycin-netilmicin combination was found to be poorly active against the MRSA strains studied, whatever their aminoglycoside susceptibility pattern. Previous studies examining the bactericidal activity of vancomycin-aminoglycoside combinations against MRSA most of the time tested gentamicin instead of netilmicin, but their authors globally reported similar indifferent results (22; Ince and Eraksoy, 8th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis.). Synergism was shown not to be predictable from the aminoglycoside MIC (22). On the other hand, some studies have reported that gentamicin (14, 17) or netilmicin (26) can enhance the bactericidal activity of vancomycin but these results were observed at inhibitory antibiotic concentrations and against only one to three strains.

The most interesting results of our study are the frequent and strong bactericidal effects of the beta -lactam (cefazolin or imipenem)-vancomycin combination and, moreover, of the beta -lactam-vancomycin-netilmicin combination. The results of our bitherapies compared favorably with those of previous works evaluating the killing activity of combinations of vancomycin and either cefotiam (35) or cefpirome (29) against MRSA: for the cefotiam-vancomycin combination, only a weak synergistic bacteriostatic effect was reported; for the cefpirome-vancomycin regimen, the bactericidal effect at 24 h was observed only against the two strains homogeneously resistant to methicillin. In a previous work performed with a single MRSA strain (36), the bactericidal effect of the imipenem-vancomycin combination has been reported to be dependent on the imipenem concentration.

To our knowledge, this is the first work studying the efficacy of triple combinations of a beta -lactam, a glycopeptide, and an aminoglycoside against MRSA strains. For the strains both homogeneously resistant to beta -lactams and resistant to netilmicin, the triple combinations had no advantage over the beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations in terms of bactericidal effect. For four of the six strains both heterogeneously resistant to methicillin and susceptible to netilmicin, the beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations failed to provide a bactericidal effect, probably because of the heterogeneous methicillin resistance. As expected for these strains, the addition of netilmicin markedly increased the killing effects of the beta -lactam-vancomycin combinations, except for one strain. However, as all of the four Kmr Tmr Gmr strains tested were homogeneously resistant to methicillin and all of the four Kmr Tmr strains were heterogeneously resistant, these results do not allow determination of what is significant in the phenotype of the strains to predict the bactericidal effects of the combinations.

In conclusion, this study shows that vancomycin combined with imipenem or cefazolin, and even with netilmicin in a triple combination (depending on the aminoglycoside susceptibility pattern of the strains), at subinhibitory concentrations can be bactericidal after 24 h at higher rates than vancomycin-netilmicin. Further studies are needed before generalizing the concept of the usefulness of adding a beta -lactam such as imipenem or cefazolin, and potentially an aminoglycoside such as netilmicin, to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections. Interestingly, the choice between cefazolin and imipenem could be based on in vitro tests but also on the clinical context: cefazolin in cases of proven monomicrobial infection due to MRSA and imipenem in cases of suspected or proven mixed infections. Lastly, the recent description of synergistic activities of different beta -lactams and vancomycin against some GISA isolates (8, 32) indicates that further studies in this field are warranted.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We gratefully thank Noële Barbier-Frébourg for interest and for help with the mecA PCR.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Charles Nicolle, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. Phone: 33 2 32 88 80 52. Fax: 33 2 32 88 80 24. E-mail: Martine.Pestel-Caron{at}chu-rouen.fr.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Ackerman, B. H., A. M. Vannier, and E. B. Eudy. 1992. Analysis of vancomycin time-kill studies with Staphylococcus species by using a curve stripping program to describe the relationship between concentration and pharmacodynamic response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1766-1769[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Barbier-Frebourg, N., D. Nouet, L. Lemée, E. Martin, and J.-F. Lemeland. 1998. Comparison of ATB Staph, Rapid ATB Staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:52-57[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Barr, J. G., E. T. M. Smyth, and G. M. Hogg. 1990. In vitro antimicrobial activity of imipenem in combination with vancomycin or teicoplanin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9:804-809[CrossRef][Medline].
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin---United States, 1997. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 46:765-766[Medline]. (Erratum, 46:851, 1997.)
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin---United States, 1997. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 46:813-815[Medline]. (Erratum, 46:851, 1997.)
6. Chambers, H. F. 1988. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1:173-186[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Chambers, H. F., and M. Sachdeva. 1990. Binding of beta -lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 161:1170-1176[Medline].
8. Climo, M. W., R. L. Patron, and G. L. Archer. 1999. Combinations of vancomycin and beta -lactams are synergistic against staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1747-1753.
9. Çokça, F., D. Arman, and G. Altay. 1998. In vitro activity of vancomycin combined with rifampin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin or imipenem against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4:657-659[Medline].
10. Comité de l'antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. 1996. Report of the comité de l'antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2:S1-S49.
11. Debbia, E., P. E. Varaldo, and G. C. Schito. 1986. In vitro activity of imipenem against enterococci and staphylococci and evidence for high rates of synergism with teicoplanin, fosfomycin, and rifampin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 30:813-815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Eliopoulos, G. M., and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 1996. Antimicrobial combinations, p. 330-396. In V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 4th ed. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md.
13. Fraise, A. P. 1998. Guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:287-289[Free Full Text].
14. Hershberger, E., J. R. Aeschlimann, T. Moldovan, and M. J. Rybak. 1999. Evaluation of bactericidal activities of LY333328, vancomycin, teicoplanin, ampicillin-sulbactam, trovafloxacin, and RP59500 alone or in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against different strains of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus by time-kill curve methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:717-721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673[CrossRef][Medline].
16. Hiramatsu, K., H. Hanaki, T. Ino, K. Yabuta, T. Oguri, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135-136[Free Full Text].
17. Houlihan, H. H., R. C. Mercier, and M. J. Rybak. 1997. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin alone and in combination with gentamicin at various dosing intervals against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected fibrin-platelet clots in an in vitro infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2497-2501[Abstract].
18. Kang, S. L., and M. J. Rybak. 1997. In-vitro bactericidal activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin alone and in combination against resistant strains of Enterococcus species and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39(Suppl. A):33-39[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Levine, D. P., B. S. Fromm, and B. R. Reddy. 1991. Slow response to vancomycin or vancomycin plus rifampin in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Ann. Intern. Med. 115:674-680.
20. Michel, M., and L. Gutmann. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: therapeutic realities and possibilities. Lancet 349:1901-1906[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Miller, G. H., F. J. Sabatelli, R. S. Hare, and J. A. Waltz. 1980. Survey of aminoglycoside resistance patterns. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 21:91-104.
22. Mulazimoglu, L., S. D. Drenning, and R. R. Muder. 1996. Vancomycin-gentamicin synergism revisited: effect of gentamicin susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1534-1535[Abstract].
23. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7 A4 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
24. Palmer, S. M., and M. J. Rybak. 1997. An evaluation of the bactericidal activity of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem or nafcillin alone and in combination with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in time-kill curves with infected fibrin clots. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:515-518[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Pearson, R. D., R. T. Steigbigel, H. T. Davis, and S. W. Chapman. 1980. Method for reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18:699-708[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Perdikaris, G., H. Giamarellou, A. Pefanis, I. Donta, and P. Karayiannakos. 1995. Vancomycin or vancomycin plus netilmicin for methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2289-2294[Abstract].
27. Pestel, M., E. Martin, C. Aucouturier, J. F. Lemeland, and F. Caron. 1995. In vitro interactions between different beta -lactam antibiotics and fosfomycin against bloodstream isolates of enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2341-2344[Abstract].
28. Portier, H., A. Kasmierczak, F. Lucht, J. C. Tremeaux, P. Chavanet, and J. M. Duez. 1985. Cefotaxime in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of severe methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Infection 13(Suppl. 1):S123-S128.
29. Raymond, J., G. Vedel, and M. Bergeret. 1996. In-vitro bactericidal activity of cefpirome in combination with vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 38:1067-1071[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Seibert, G., D. Isert, N. Klesel, M. Limbert, A. Markus, and E. Schrinner. 1992. The in-vitro antibacterial activity of a combination of cefpirome or cefoperazone with vancomycin against enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 29(Suppl. A):25-30.
31. Shaw, K. J., P. N. Rather, R. S. Hare, and G. H. Miller. 1993. Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol. Rev. 57:138-163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Sieradzki, K., R. B. Roberts, S. W. Haber, and A. Tomasz. 1999. The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:517-523[Free Full Text].
33. Small, P. M., and H. F. Chambers. 1990. Vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in intravenous drug users. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1227-1231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Steers, D., E. L. Foltz, B. S. Gravies, and J. Rindel. 1959. An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Antibiot. Chemother. (Basel) 9:307-311.
35. Sugiura, A., K. Kono, T. Kono, and E. Higashide. 1991. The effect of combinations of cefotiam and other antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28:707-717[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Totsuka, K., M. Shiseki, K. Kikuchi, and Y. Matsui. 1999. Combined effects of vancomycin and imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro and in vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44:455-460[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37. Watanakunakorn, C., and J. C. Tisone. 1982. Synergism between vancomycin and gentamicin or tobramycin for methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22:903-905[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Wise, R., J. P. Ashby, and J. M. Andrews. 1989. The antibacterial activity of meropenem in combination with gentamicin or vancomycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 24(Suppl. A):233-238.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2000, p. 3055-3060, Vol. 44, No. 11
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Yanagisawa, C., Hanaki, H., Matsui, H., Ikeda, S., Nakae, T., Sunakawa, K. (2009). Rapid Depletion of Free Vancomycin in Medium in the Presence of {beta}-Lactam Antibiotics and Growth Restoration in Staphylococcus aureus Strains with {beta}-Lactam-Induced Vancomycin Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 63-68 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jacqueline, C., Navas, D., Batard, E., Miegeville, A.-F., Le Mabecque, V., Kergueris, M.-F., Bugnon, D., Potel, G., Caillon, J. (2005). In Vitro and In Vivo Synergistic Activities of Linezolid Combined with Subinhibitory Concentrations of Imipenem against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 45-51 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tam, V. H., Schilling, A. N., Lewis, R. E., Melnick, D. A., Boucher, A. N. (2004). Novel Approach to Characterization of Combined Pharmacodynamic Effects of Antimicrobial Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4315-4321 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bertazzoni Minelli, E., Benini, A., Magnan, B., Bartolozzi, P. (2004). Release of gentamicin and vancomycin from temporary human hip spacers in two-stage revision of infected arthroplasty. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 329-334 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Oie, S., Uematsu, T., Sawa, A., Mizuno, H., Tomita, M., Ishida, S., Okano, Y., Kamiya, A. (2003). In vitro effects of combinations of antipseudomonal agents against seven strains of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 911-914 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vakulenko, S. B., Mobashery, S. (2003). Versatility of Aminoglycosides and Prospects for Their Future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 430-450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rochon-Edouard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rochon-Edouard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Caron, F.