Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2000, p. 3306-3309, Vol. 44, No. 12
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Polycationic Peptides as Prophylactic Agents against
Methicillin-Susceptible or Methicillin-Resistant
Staphylococcus epidermidis Vascular Graft Infection
Andrea
Giacometti,1,*
Oscar
Cirioni,1
Roberto
Ghiselli,2
Luigi
Goffi,2
Federico
Mocchegiani,2
Alessandra
Riva,1
Giorgio
Scalise,1 and
Vittorio
Saba2
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Public
Health,1 and Department of General
Surgery, National Institute for Research and Therapy in the
Elderly,2 University of Ancona, Ancona,
Italy
Received 9 February 2000/Returned for modification 8 August
2000/Accepted 31 August 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Several polycationic peptides isolated from animals, plants, and
bacterial species possess a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. A
rat model was used to investigate the efficacies of two peptides,
ranalexin and buforin II, in the prevention of vascular prosthetic
graft infections. The effect of peptide-soaked collagen-sealed Dacron
was compared to that of rifampin-soaked collagen-sealed Dacron in the
rat model of graft infection caused by methicillin-susceptible rifampin-susceptible Staphylococcus epidermidis and
methicillin-resistant rifampin-susceptible S. epidermidis.
Graft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of
240 adult male Wistar rats by implantation of 1-cm2 Dacron
prostheses, followed by topical inoculation with 2 × 107 CFU of S. epidermidis. The study
included a control group (no graft contamination), two contaminated
groups that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, two
contaminated groups to which perioperative intraperitoneal
cefazolin prophylaxis (30 mg/kg of body weight) was administered, six
contaminated groups that received a peptide- or rifampin-soaked graft,
and six contaminated groups that received a peptide- or rifampin-soaked
graft and perioperative intraperitoneal cefazolin prophylaxis (30 mg/kg). The grafts were sterilely removed 7 days after
implantation, and the infection was evaluated by using sonication and
quantitative agar culture. Overall, the efficacies of the polycationic
peptides against the methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant
strains were not significantly different from that of rifampin.
Nevertheless, the combinations of ranalexin- and buforin
II-coated grafts with cefazolin treatment demonstrated efficacies
significantly higher than that of the combination of rifampin-coated
grafts and cefazolin treatment against the methicillin-resistant strain.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vascular prosthetic graft infection
is one of the most feared complications that the vascular surgeon
treats, frequently resulting in prolonged hospitalization, organ
failure, amputation, and death. The patient can develop late-appearing
signs of infection as commonly as early postoperative infection
(1, 3). Coagulase-negative staphylococci are among the most
common pathogens that cause biomaterial infections. In particular,
Staphylococcus epidermidis, a commensal organism of the
skin, is the most frequent cause of late-appearing vascular graft
infection in humans (1-3, 21). Effective strategies for the
prevention of prosthetic infection vary from device to device. The
centerpiece of therapy is prophylactic systemic antibiotics (3,
7). In addition, in the case of vascular grafts, antimicrobials, such as rifampin, bound at high concentrations to prosthetic grafts have been proposed as adjunctive prophylaxis (6, 9, 15, 19, 20,
22, 24, 26).
In recent years several polycationic peptides, compounds that comprise
a diverse class of molecules, have been isolated from a wide range of
bacteria, plants, insects, fish, amphibians, birds, mammals, and humans
(4, 5, 11). In mammals, including humans, they are the
predominant protein species in the neutrophil, and they are also found
on the surfaces of the tongue, trachea, lungs, and upper intestine and
are thought to be a major antibacterial defense on mucosal surfaces
(11, 12). Recent reports have demonstrated that the site for
the antibacterial action of the peptides is the cytoplasmic membrane,
where they cause the formation of ion-channel pores that span the
membrane without requiring a specific target receptor. Therefore, these
compounds must initially be able to cross or disintegrate the outer
membranes of gram-negative bacteria and the peptidoglycan (10, 11,
12, 25). The essential property of the polycationic peptides is
their net positive charge at neutral pH (usually +4, +5, or +6) by
virtue of their possession of the amino acids arginine and lysine
(11). In addition, these compounds are amphipathic
molecules: they have both a hydrophobic face, comprising nonpolar amino
acid side chains, and a hydrophilic face of polar and positively
charged residues (11, 12). The selective antibiotic activity
of the cationic peptides is determined by their mode of interaction
with the bacterial surface: typically, their positively charged
residues interact with the negatively charged lipids of the
bacterial membranes. On the other hand, the low anionic lipid
content of the eukaryotic cells leads to the selectivity of the
activity of the peptides for bacteria (10, 11, 12). The
surfaces of several synthetic materials used by microbiologists and
surgeons, such as polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron), and
polytetrafluoroethylene, bind cationic molecules, and this property has
been evaluated and used during in vitro and in vivo studies
(13, 17; R. E. W. Hancock, Laboratory methods,
1998 [http://www.interchg.ubc.ca/bobh/MIC.htm]). By virtue of
this binding, the retention of the biologically active molecules is not
due to passive entrapment in the plastic tissue but reflects an ionic
interaction between the anionic ligands and the cationic compounds. In
experimental models, if the antimicrobial agents have an insufficient
number of positively charged residues, they are usually bound to the
prosthetic graft via a binding compound such as collagen, albumin,
fibrin, and tridodecylmethylammonium chloride (6, 9, 13, 15, 19,
20, 24, 26). In this study we investigated the in vivo efficacies
of two polycationic peptides, ranalexin and buforin II, spontaneously
bound to a Dacron graft in preventing S. epidermidis
infection of the graft in a rat model.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Organisms.
A commercially available methicillin-susceptible
(MS) quality control strain of S. epidermidis, strain ATCC
12228, and one clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant (MR) S. epidermidis (Se56-99) were used.
Drugs.
Buforin II, ranalexin, rifampin, cefazolin, and
oxacillin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l. (Milan, Italy).
Buforin II and ranalexin were dissolved in distilled H2O at
20 times the required maximal concentration. For in vitro studies,
serial dilutions of the peptides were prepared in 0.01% acetic acid
containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin in polypropylene tubes (Hancock,
Laboratory methods). Rifampin was dissolved in 50% methanol-50%
acetone at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Cefazolin and oxacillin were
dissolved in sterile distilled water at a concentration of 1 mg/ml.
Solutions were made fresh on the day of assay or were stored at
80°C in the dark for short periods. The concentration range assayed
for each antibiotic was 0.25 to 256 µg/ml.
Susceptibility testing.
The antimicrobial susceptibilities
of the strains were determined by using the broth microdilution method
by the procedures outlined by the National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards (14). The MIC was taken as the lowest
antibiotic concentration at which observable growth was inhibited.
However, the MICs of buforin II and ranalexin were determined by the
procedures recently proposed for the testing of antimicrobial peptides
(Hancock, Laboratory methods). Particularly, since cationic peptides
bind to polystyrene, 96-well polypropylene plates (Sigma-Aldrich) were
substituted for polystyrene plates and the plates were incubated for
18 h at 37°C in air. The plates were shaken throughout the
study. The MIC was considered the lowest peptide concentration that
reduced growth by more than 50% of that in the control well. The
viable count in each well was determined by preparing 10
6
dilutions and plating 10 µl of each dilution onto Mueller-Hinton agar
plates to obtain overnight cultures. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Rat model.
Adult male Wistar rats (weight range, 300 to
350 g) were studied. The study included a control group (no graft
contamination) and two series composed of eight groups (groups MS1 to
MS8 and MR1 to MR8) for each of the staphylococcal strains. Each of the series included one contaminated group (groups MS1 and MR1) that received intraperitoneally isotonic sodium chloride solution, one
contaminated group (groups MS2 and MR2) to which perioperative intraperitoneal cefazolin prophylaxis (30 mg/kg of body weight), was
administered, three contaminated groups (groups MS3 to MS5 and MR3 to
MR5) that received a buforin II-, a ranalexin-, or a rifampin-soaked
graft, respectively, and three contaminated groups (groups MS6 to MS8
and MR6 to MR8) that received a buforin II-, a ranalexin-, or a
rifampin-soaked graft, respectively, and perioperative intraperitoneal
cefazolin prophylaxis (30 mg/kg). Each group consisted of 15 animals.
The rats were anesthetized with ether, the hair of the inbacks was
shaved, and the skin was cleansed with 10% povidone-iodine solution.
One subcutaneous pocket was made on each side of the median line with
1.5-cm incision. Aseptically, 1-cm2 sterile collagen-sealed
Dacron grafts (Albograft; Sorin Biomedica Cardio, S.p.A., Saluggi VC,
Italy) were implanted into the pockets. Prior to implantation, the
Dacron graft segments were impregnated with 10 µg of buforin II per
ml (groups MS2, MS5, MR2, and MR5), 10 µg of ranalexin per ml (groups
MS3, MS6, MR3, and MR6), and 5 mg of rifampin per ml (groups MS4, MS7,
MR4, and MR7). Antibiotic soaking was done immediately before
implantation by placing the grafts for 20 min in a sterile solution of
the agents mentioned above. Groups MS1, MS8, MR1, and MR8 received
nonantibiotic-impregnated Dacron graft segments. In addition, the
effect of preoperative intraperitoneal cefazolin administered 30 min
before implantation at the standard dose of 30 mg/kg was evaluated in
groups MS5 to MS8 and MR5 to MR8. The pockets were closed by means of
skin clips, and sterile saline solution (1 ml) containing S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 or the MR strain S. epidermidis
Se56-99 at a concentration of 2 × 107 CFU/ml was
inoculated onto the graft surface by using a tuberculin syringe to
create a subcutaneous fluid-filled pocket (2). The animals
were returned to individual cages and were thoroughly examined daily.
All grafts were explanted 7 days following implantation.
Assessment of infection.
The explanted grafts were placed in
sterile tubes, washed in sterile saline solution, placed in tubes
containing 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline solution, and sonicated
for 5 min to remove the adherent bacteria from the grafts. Quantitation
of viable bacteria was done by preparing serial dilutions (0.1 ml) of
the bacterial suspensions in 10 mM sodium HEPES buffer (pH 7.2)
(Sigma-Aldrich) to minimize the carryover effect and by culturing each
dilution on blood agar plates. All plates were incubated at 37°C for
48 h and were evaluated for the presence of the staphylococcal strains. The organisms were quantitated by counting the numbers of CFU
per plate. The limit of detection for this method was approximately 5 × 101 CFU/cm2 of graft tissue.
Statistical analysis.
MICs are presented as the geometric
means of three separate experiments. Quantitative culture results for
all groups are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and
the statistical comparisons between groups were done by analysis of
variance of the log-transformed data by the Tukey-Kramer honestly
significant difference test. Significance was accepted when the
P value was
0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
According to the broth microdilution method, the buforin II and
ranalexin MICs for S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 and
S. epidermidis Se56-99 were 2 and 4 mg/liter
and 2 and 8 mg/liter, respectively. The two strains were
similarly susceptible to rifampin (MICs, 0.25 mg/liter for both
organisms), while they demonstrated different patterns of
susceptibility to the beta-lactam antibiotics. Actually, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 was susceptible to oxacillin and
cefazolin (MICs, 0.5 and 2 mg/liter, respectively), while S. epidermidis Se56-99 was resistant (MICs, 8 and 32 mg/liter, respectively).
None of the animals included in the control group (no graft
contamination) had anatomic or microbiological evidence of graft infection. On the contrary, all 30 rats included in groups MS1 and MR1
demonstrated evidence of graft infection, with quantitative culture
results showing 3.1 × 107 ± 6.0 × 106 and 1.8 × 107 ± 3.3 × 106 CFU/cm2 of graft, respectively, although
there were no local signs of perigraft inflammation. Groups MS2 and MR2
(with buforin-coated Dacron grafts) and groups MS5 and MR5 (with
buforin-coated Dacron grafts plus intraperitoneal cefazolin treatment)
showed no evidence of staphylococcal infection, with negative
quantitative culture results. For the 30 rats with ranalexin-coated
Dacron grafts (groups MS3 and MR3), the quantitative graft cultures
demonstrated bacterial growth (1.2 × 103 ± 5.0 × 102 and 2.3 × 103 ± 6.5 × 102 CFU/cm2 of graft,
respectively). On the contrary, none of the 30 rats with
ranalexin-coated grafts plus intraperitoneal cefazolin treatment (groups MS6 and MR6) had evidence of infection. Cultures of the grafts
from groups MS4 and MR4 (with rifampin-coated grafts) showed results
similar to those for the animals treated with ranalexin-coated grafts
(1.9 × 103 ± 4.5 × 102 and
2.4 × 103 ± 7.0 × 102
CFU/cm2 of graft, respectively). Nevertheless, the results
showed that the use of rifampin-coated grafts and cefazolin treatment
(groups MS7 and MR7) was less effective than the use of
ranalexin-coated grafts and cefazolin treatment. Actually, infection
occurred in groups MS7 and MR7, although with low bacterial numbers
(4.0 × 102 ± 1.0 × 102 and
8.0 × 102 ± 2.0 × 102
CFU/cm2 of graft, respectively). The results for groups MS8
and MR8 (with intraperitoneal cefazolin treatment and a Dacron graft
without antibiotic impregnation) confirmed the efficacy of preoperative cefazolin against the MS staphylococcal strains (6.5 × 102 ± 3.5 × 102 CFU/cm2
of graft) and, on the contrary, its poor efficacy against the MR
strains (1.5 × 107 ± 4.7 × 106 CFU/cm2 of graft).
There were significant differences in the results for the quantitative
bacterial graft cultures when the data obtained for all treated groups
were compared with those obtained for the untreated groups. On the
contrary, no statistically significant difference was observed between
groups MR1 and MR8. Data on the quantitative culture results and from
statistical comparisons of the groups are summarized in Table
1.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The vascular surgery patient's own endogenous flora is the most
likely source of S. epidermidis organisms that colonize the graft. This organism has been recovered from the skin, subcutaneous fat, lymph nodes, and arterial walls of greater than one-third of
individuals undergoing vascular reconstruction, despite the use of
aseptic vascular surgical technique and prophylactic antibiotics (3). The success of surgical prophylaxis on the prevention of graft infections is dependent on the pharmacokinetics of
antibiotic penetration into tissue and maintenance of adequate levels
in tissue for the duration of the vascular surgical procedure.
Nevertheless, errors in sterilization procedures and increases in the
incidence and resistance of S. epidermidis can predispose an
individual to prosthesis infection. In particular, after the initial
success with beta-lactams as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis,
resistance to these drugs began to emerge. Since the emergence of MR
staphylococci, glycopeptides have been the only uniformly effective
treatments for staphylococcal infections. However, the recent emergence
of glycopeptide resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci
heightens concern about the need for other antibiotics in prophylactic
regimens (18, 21). Polycationic peptides are known to have
variable antibacterial, antifungal, and antiprotozoan activities in
vitro. These compounds provide a basic host defense system that combats infections: for these reasons, in this study we investigated the in
vivo efficacies of two polycationic peptides, ranalexin and buforin II,
spontaneously bound to an albumin-sealed Dacron graft for the
prevention of S. epidermidis infection of the graft in a rat model.
Buforin II and ranalexin showed similar in vitro activities against the
two staphylococcal strains tested. In addition, rifampin exerted equal
in vitro activity against the two strains. Actually, in the present
study S. epidermidis Se56-99 was chosen because it has been
demonstrated to be oxacillin resistant and is as susceptible to
rifampin as the standard control strain S. epidermidis
ATCC 12228. Cefazolin, a narrow-spectrum cephalosporin, was
chosen as the intraperitoneal prophylactic agent because of its minimal toxicity over a wide range of doses. Moreover, it is a commonly used
antibiotic for surgical prophylaxis in vascular surgery patients and
achieved adequate levels in tissue after administration of a single
dose, with maintenance of those levels for 2 to 3 h. In order to
evaluate the presence of a positive interaction with the drugs bonded
to the Dacron graft, cefazolin was also tested against MR S. epidermidis, although we presumed that it would be ineffective
when used alone. Indeed, recent studies demonstrated that the
polycationic peptides present properties of synergy with lipophilic and
amphiphilic agents such as rifampin, macrolides, fusidic acid, and
novobiocin. Actually, those reports indicated that they allow maximal
entry of several hydrophobic substrates into the cell (11, 12,
23). Moreover, recent investigations demonstrated a positive
interaction between peptides and beta-lactams: it might be due to
increased access of the peptides to the cytoplasmic membrane following
breakdown of the peptidoglycan by beta-lactams. On the other hand, the
peptides, by triggering the activities of bacterial murein hydrolases,
might cause degradation of the peptidoglycan and enhance the activities
of the beta-lactams (10, 11, 12).
Taken together, the results of this study demonstrated that the use of
preoperative intraperitoneal cefazolin or an antibiotic-soaked Dacron
graft can result in significant bacterial growth inhibition even if
high concentrations of organisms are topically inoculated into the
Dacron prostheses. Statistical analysis demonstrated that any
prophylactic antibiotic treatment was useful; nevertheless, only
buforin II was able to inhibit the bacterial growth completely, even though buforin II bonded to the Dacron graft was used alone. On
the other hand, ranalexin was also shown to be highly effective. Actually, ranalexin was demonstrated to be as effective as rifampin and, when combined with intraperitoneal cefazolin, produced complete suppression of both MS and MR staphylococcal strains.
Similar to the other agents tested, neither buforin II nor
ranalexin showed any noteworthy toxicity. Actually, none of the animals included in any group died or had clinical evidence of drug-related adverse effects, such as local signs of perigraft inflammation, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, or behavioral alterations.
Buforin II and ranalexin are polycationic peptides derived from
amphibian tissues: the first was derived from buforin I, a potent
peptide isolated from the stomach tissue of an Asian toad, Bufo
bufo gargarizans, and the second was isolated from the skin of the
American bullfrog (Rana catasbeiana) (8, 16). The strong in vivo antibacterial efficacies of the two peptides chosen for
this study well suit the remarkable resistance of frogs and toads to
infection after external injury, despite the contaminated environments
in which these animals live (5, 11). The widespread use of
several antimicrobial agents both in therapeutic regimens and in
prophylactic regimens resulted in a dramatic increase in the prevalence
of multidrug-resistant organisms, such as MR staphylococci. In fact,
the short doubling times and genetic plasticity of bacteria permit
these organisms to rapidly prove whether specific mutations enhance
their ability to grow in inhospitable environments. Mutations that
confer resistance help bacteria survive attacks from antibiotics used
clinically. Nevertheless, as a consequence of the mode of action of the
peptides, the emergence of peptide-resistant mutants should be an
unlikely event, since alteration of the membrane structure to prevent
insertion and channel formation is far more difficult than remodeling
of target enzymes. Today, despite the speculated modes of action of the
peptides, proof of their clinical benefits are lacking. However,
the antistaphylococcal in vitro activity and the prophylactic
in vivo efficacy demonstrated in the present study make these
molecules potentially useful for preoperative antimicrobial
chemoprophylaxis. Future research based on animal and human models is
needed to elucidate their in vivo efficacies and toxicities and their
utility in clinical practice.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinica delle
Malattie Infettive, c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I, Piazza Cappelli, 1, 60121 Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 071 5963467. Fax: 39 071 5963468. E-mail: cmalinf{at}popcsi.unian.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bergamini, T. M.,
R. A. Corpus, Jr.,
K. R. Brittian,
J. C. Peyton, and W. G. Cheadle.
1994.
The natural history of bacterial biofilm graft infection.
J. Surg. Res.
56:393-396[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bergamini, T. M.,
R. A. Corpus, Jr.,
T. M. McCurry,
J. C. Peyton,
K. R. Brittian, and W. G. Cheadle.
1995.
Immunosuppression augments growth of graft-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Arch. Surg.
130:1345-1350[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bergamini, T. M.,
J. C. Peyton, and W. G. Cheadle.
1992.
Prophylactic antibiotics prevent bacterial biofilm graft infection.
J. Surg. Res.
52:101-105[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bevins, C. L., and M. Zasloff.
1990.
Peptides from frog skin.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
59:395-414[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cannon, M.
1987.
A family of wound healers.
Nature
328:478[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chervu, A.,
W. S. Moore,
H. A. Gelabert,
M. D. Colburn, and M. Chvapil.
1991.
Prevention of graft infection by use of prostheses bonded with a rifampin collagen release system.
J. Vasc. Surg.
14:521-524[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Citak, M. S.,
J. I. Cué,
J. C. Peyton, and M. A. Malangoni.
1992.
The critical relationship of antibiotic dose and bacterial contamination in experimental infection.
J. Surg. Res.
52:127-130[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Clark, D. P.,
S. Durell,
W. L. Maloy, and M. Zasloff.
1994.
Ranalexin: a novel antimicrobial peptide from bullfrog (Rana catasbeiana) skin, structurally related to the bacterial antibiotic polymyxin.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:10849-10855[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Goeau-Brissoniere, O.,
C. Leport,
F. Bacourt,
C. Lebrault,
R. Comte, and J. C. Pechere.
1991.
Prevention of vascular graft infection by rifampin bonding to a gelatin-sealed Dacron graft.
Ann. Vasc. Surg.
5:408-412[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Hancock, R. E. W.
1997.
Antibacterial peptides and the outer membranes of gram-negative bacilli.
J. Med. Microbiol.
46:1-3[Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Hancock, R. E. W.
1997.
Peptide antibiotics.
Lancet
349:418-422[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hancock, R. E. W., and D. S. Chapple.
1999.
Peptide antibiotics.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:1317-1323[Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Harvey, R. A.,
D. V. Alcid, and R. S. Greco.
1982.
Antibiotic bonding to polytetrafluoroethylene with tridodecylmethylammonium chloride.
Surgery
92:504-512[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1993.
Approved standard M7-A3. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 15.
|
Osada, T.,
K. Yamamura,
K. Fujimoto,
K. Mizuno,
T. Sakurai,
M. Ohta, and T. Nabeshima.
1999.
Prophylaxis of local vascular graft infection with levofloxacin incorporated into albumin-sealed dacron graft.
Microbiol. Immunol.
43:317-321[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Park, C. B.,
M. S. Kim, and S. C. Kim.
1996.
A novel antimicrobial peptide from Bufo bufo gargarizans.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
218:408-413[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Phaneuf, M. D.,
W. C. Quist,
M. J. Bide, and F. W. LoGerfo.
1995.
Modification of the polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) via denier reduction: effects on material tensile strength, weight, and protein binding capabilities.
J. Appl. Biomater.
6:289-299[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Sanyal, D.,
A. P. Johnson,
R. C. George,
B. D. Cookson, and A. J. Williams.
1991.
Peritonitis due to vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Lancet
337:54[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Sardelic, F.,
P. Y. Ao,
D. A. Taylor, and J. P. Fletcher.
1996.
Prophylaxis against Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infection with rifampicin-soaked, gelatin-sealed Dacron.
Cardiovasc. Surg.
4:389-392[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Sardelic, F., and J. P. Fletcher.
1995.
Rifampicin impregnated Dacron grafts: no development of rifampicin resistance in an animal model.
Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg.
9:314-318[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Schwalbe, R. S.,
J. T. Stapleton, and P. H. Gilligan.
1987.
Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.
N. Engl. J. Med.
316:927-931[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Shue, W. B.,
S. C. Worosilo,
A. P. Donetz,
S. Z. Trooskin,
R. A. Harvey, and R. S. Greco.
1988.
Prevention of vascular prosthetic infection with an antibiotic-bonded Dacron graft.
J. Vasc. Surg.
8:600-605[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Vaara, M., and M. Porro.
1996.
Group of peptides that act synergistically with hydrophobic antibiotics against gram-negative enteric bacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:1801-1805[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Vicaretti, M.,
W. J. Hawthorne,
P. Y. Ao, and J. P. Fletcher.
1998.
An increased concentration of rifampicin bonded to gelatin-sealed Dacron reduces the incidence of subsequent graft infections following a staphylococcal challenge.
Cardiovasc. Surg.
6:268-273[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Viljanen, P.,
H. Matsunaga,
Y. Kimura, and M. Vaara.
1991.
The outer membrane permeability-increasing action of deacylpolymyxins.
J. Antibiot.
44:517-523[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Yamamura, K.,
T. Sakurai,
K. Yano,
T. Osada, and T. Nabeshima.
1995.
Prevention of vascular graft infection by sisomicin incorporated into fibrin glue.
Microbiol. Immunol.
39:895-896[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2000, p. 3306-3309, Vol. 44, No. 12
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lamarche, M. G., Kim, S.-H., Crepin, S., Mourez, M., Bertrand, N., Bishop, R. E., Dubreuil, J. D., Harel, J.
(2008). Modulation of Hexa-Acyl Pyrophosphate Lipid A Population under Escherichia coli Phosphate (Pho) Regulon Activation. J. Bacteriol.
190: 5256-5264
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lamarche, M. G., Dozois, C. M., Daigle, F., Caza, M., Curtiss, R. III, Dubreuil, J. D., Harel, J.
(2005). Inactivation of the Pst System Reduces the Virulence of an Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 Strain. Infect. Immun.
73: 4138-4145
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Monk, B. C., Niimi, K., Lin, S., Knight, A., Kardos, T. B., Cannon, R. D., Parshot, R., King, A., Lun, D., Harding, D. R. K.
(2005). Surface-Active Fungicidal D-Peptide Inhibitors of the Plasma Membrane Proton Pump That Block Azole Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 57-70
[Abstract]
[Full Text]