Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2000, p. 3476-3477, Vol. 44, No. 12
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Susceptibilities of Corynebacterium
bovis and Corynebacterium amylocolatum Isolates from
Bovine Mammary Glands to 15 Antimicrobial Agents
Jeffrey L.
Watts1,* and
Silvia
Rossbach2
Pharmacia and Upjohn Animal Health,
Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001,1 and
Department of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan
University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 490082
Received 11 February 2000/Returned for modification 30 July
2000/Accepted 6 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Coryneform bacteria are frequently isolated from bovine mastitis
and are associated with economic losses. Generally, the MICs of the 15 antimicrobial agents tested at which 90% of the isolates tested are
inhibited for 46 Corynebacterium bovis and 13 Corynebacterium amylocolatum strains were low. These are
the first quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility data available for
coryneforms from bovine mastitis. Data from this study suggest that
comparable corynebacteria from humans have a much higher level of
antimicrobial resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents.
 |
TEXT |
Coryneform bacteria are
frequently isolated from bovine mastitis (2, 6, 7). In a
previous study, the lipophilic species, Corynebacterium
bovis and Corynebacterium amylocolatum were the most frequently isolated coryneform organisms (10).
Antibiotic therapy is an essential component of mastitis control
programs, and the accurate selection of the most effective
antimicrobial agents depends upon the susceptibility of the organism to
the agent. The purpose of this study was to determine the
susceptibility of C. bovis and other coryneforms isolated
from bovine mastitis to various antimicrobial agents.
Forty-six strains of C. bovis and 13 strains of C. amylocolatum from a previous study were used
(10). Prior to the MIC determinations, all
isolates were revived by subculture on Trypticase soy agar (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.)
supplemented with 5% sheep blood and 1.0% Tween 80 and
incubated for 24 h at 35 to 37°C. MICs were determined
using a broth microdilution method (Sensititre, Westlake, Ohio),
except that the Mueller-Hinton broth was supplemented with 1% Tween 80 (6, 10). The MIC panel contained the
following antimicrobial agents: ampicillin, oxacillin, cephalothin,
ceftiofur, penicillin plus novobiocin, erythromycin, clindamycin,
pirlimycin, tilmicosin, florfenicol, tetracycline, enrofloxacin,
sarafloxacin, danofloxacin, and premafloxacin. The NCCLS-recommended
quality control strains were included with each batch of organisms tested.
No information is available on the in vitro activity of
antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat bovine mastitis
caused by strains of C. bovis. The lack of in vitro
antimicrobial susceptibility data may be due to the difficulty in
cultivating C. bovis, as it fails to grow without lipid
supplementation of the basal medium (3, 10). Previous
studies (4, 8) determining the antimicrobial susceptibility
of lipophilic corynebacteria isolated from humans, such as
Corynebacterium jeikeium, have recommended the addition of
rabbit serum or 0.1% Tween 80. However, the lipid requirements for
C. jeikeium appear to be lower than those for C. bovis, as the former organism will grow on blood-supplemented
media, while C. bovis grows very poorly, if at all.
Results of a previous study (10) indicated that
acceptable growth of C. bovis could be achieved by
supplementing the basal medium with 1% Tween 80. Thus, we chose to use
Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 1% Tween 80 for the test medium.
Although this supplementation has not been recommended by NCCLS, the
test results for the individual antimicrobial agents with the quality
control organisms fell within guidelines published by NCCLS
(6).
The MICs obtained with 46 strains of C. bovis are summarized
in Table 1. Soriano et al. (8)
determined the activity of various antimicrobial agents against 43 strains of C. jeikeium, a lipophilic corynebacterium
isolated from humans. Phylogenetic studies (as reviewed in
reference 3) have also determined that C. jeikeium is the organism most closely related to C. bovis. All of the antimicrobial agents tested except tilmicosin
were active against the strains of C. bovis. For example,
the MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited
(MIC90s) of ampicillin, oxacillin, cephalothin, and
ceftiofur against C. bovis ranged from 0.25 to 4.0 µg/ml
compared to 16.0 to >64.0 µg/ml for the type strain of C. jeikeium. In contrast, Soriano et al. (8) reported that
the MIC90s of ampicillin, oxacillin, cephalothin, and
cefuroxime for C. jeikeium were >256.0 µg/ml.
The macrolides (erythromycin and tilmicosin) and lincosamides
(clindamycin and pirlimycin) inhibit protein synthesis in bacterial cells by binding to the same site on the ribosome (1, 5, 11). In the present study, the MIC90s for
erythromycin, tilmicosin, clindamycin, and pirlimycin were
0.06,
>32.0, 0.25, and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively. This is markedly
different from the MIC90s obtained for C. jeikeium, which were >256.0 µg/ml for both erythromycin and
clindamycin (8). Tilmicosin appears to be less potent than erythromycin, with a higher MIC50 (1.0 µg/ml) and
MIC90 (>32.0 µg/ml). With the exception of one strain
for which the MIC of erythromycin was high, the MICs for all strains
were 0.5 µg/ml or below for this compound. In contrast, the
tilmicosin MICs for all strains of C. bovis were 0.5 µg/ml
or higher. The reason for the differences is unknown, but they are most
likely due to differences in tilmicosin's and erythromycin's
abilities to penetrate the cell.
Tetracycline and florfenicol are approved for use in veterinary
medicine but are not available as intramammary infusion products. Both
compounds were much more active against strains of C. bovis than against human strains of C. jeikeium (8).
For example, the MIC90 of tetracycline was 0.25 µg/ml for C. bovis compared to 64.0 µg/ml for
C. jeikeium (8).
The fluoroquinolones are widely used in human and veterinary medicine
to treat a variety of diseases (11). Of these, the fluoroquinolones enrofloxacin, sarafloxacin, and danofloxacin demonstrated good activity, with MIC90s ranging from 0.25 to 0.5 µg/ml. In contrast, the expanded-spectrum fluoroquinolone
(9) premafloxacin was much more active, with a
MIC90 of 0.015 µg/ml.
C. amylocolatum is a normal resident of healthy human skin
and is one of the corynebacteria most frequently isolated from this
body site (3, 4). In the present study, we tested 13 strains
isolated from bovine mastitis (Table 2).
In contrast to the bovine strains, the human strains tend to be much
more resistant to antimicrobial agents. For example, the
MIC90s of ampicillin, oxacillin, cephalothin, and
ceftriaxone for the human strains were >64.0 µg/ml, while the
MIC90s for the bovine strains were 0.25, 2.0, 0.5, and 0.5 µg/ml (ceftiofur value), respectively (4).
Similar results are also seen for C. amylocolatum with the
macrolides and lincosamides, as the MIC90s for the human
strains were >64.0 µg/ml for both erythromycin and clindamycin,
compared to 0.13 and 0.5 µg/ml for these same agents with the bovine
strains (4). As was the case with C. bovis,
tilmicosin was much less active (MIC90 = 32.0 µg/ml)
than erythromycin, clindamycin, or pirlimycin. Both tetracycline and
florfenicol were much less active against the C. amylocolatum strains tested than against C. bovis. The
MIC90 of ciprofloxacin was also >64.0 µg/ml for the
human strains (4) compared to 0.25 µg/ml for enrofloxacin
(a ciprofloxacin analogue) for the bovine strains.
This study represents the first quantitative assessment of the in vitro
activity of various antimicrobial agents against bovine strains of
C. bovis and C. amylocolatum. Generally, all the
agents tested demonstrated good in vitro activity against these
organisms. Data from this study suggest that comparable corynebacteria
from humans have a much higher level of antimicrobial resistance to a
variety of antimicrobial agents.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Cheryl A. Case, Ellen S. Portis, and Sarah A. Salmon for
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pharmacia and
Upjohn Animal Health, 7923-190-039, Kalamazoo, MI 49001. Phone: (616) 833-2605. Fax: (616) 833-3295. E-mail:
jeffrey.l.watts{at}am.pnu.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Auckenthaler, R. W.,
A. Azwahlen, and F. A. Waldvogel.
1986.
Macrolides, p. 115.
In
P. K. Peterson, and J. Verhoef (ed.), The antimicrobial agents annual 1. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Brooks, B. W., and D. A. Barnum.
1984.
The susceptibility of bovine udder quarters colonized with Corynebacterium bovis to experimental infection with Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus agalactiae.
Can. J. Comp. Med.
48:146[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Funke, G.,
A. von Graevenitz,
J. E. Clarridge III, and K. A. Bernard.
1997.
Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
10:125-159[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Funke, G.,
V. Pünter, and A. von Graevenitz.
1996.
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of some recently established coryneform bacteria.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2874-2878[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Hermans, P. E.
1986.
Lincosaminides, p. 103-114.
In
P. K. Peterson, and J. Verhoef (ed.), The antimicrobial agents annual 1. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1999.
Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Tentative standard. NCCLS document M31-A.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 7.
|
Pankey, J. W.,
S. C. Nickerson,
R. L. Boddie, and J. S. Hogan.
1985.
Effects of Corynebacterium bovis infection on susceptibility to major pathogens.
J. Dairy Sci.
68:2684-2693.
|
| 8.
|
Soriano, F.,
J. Zapardiel, and E. Nieto.
1995.
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Corynebacterium species and other non-spore-forming gram-positive bacilli to 18 antimicrobial agents.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:208-214[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Watts, J. L.,
S. A. Salmon,
M. S. Sanchez, and R. J. Yancey, Jr.
1997.
In vitro activity of premafloxacin, a new extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone, against pathogens of veterinary importance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:1190-1192[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Watts, J. L., and S. Rossbach.
2000.
Identification of Corynebacterium bovis and other coryneforms isolated from bovine mammary glands.
J. Dairy Sci.
83:2373-2379[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Yao, J. D. C., and R. C. Moellering, Jr.
1995.
Antibacterial agents, p. 1281-1307.
In
P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2000, p. 3476-3477, Vol. 44, No. 12
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.