This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2000, p. 414-417, Vol. 44, No. 2
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Development of Resistance to Telithromycin (HMR 3647), Four Macrolides, Clindamycin, and Pristinamycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Todd A. Davies,1 Bonifacio E. Dewasse,1 Michael R. Jacobs,2 and Peter C. Appelbaum1,*

Department of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033,1 and Department of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 441062

Received 19 May 1999/Returned for modification 12 October 1999/Accepted 31 October 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The ability of 50 sequential subcultures in subinhibitory concentrations of telithromycin (HMR 3647), azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, roxithromycin, clindamycin, and pristinamycin to select for resistance was studied in five macrolide-susceptible and six macrolide-resistant pneumococci containing mefE or ermB. Telithromycin selected for resistance less often than the other drugs.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Ketolides are semisynthetic derivatives of erythromycin A characterized by a lack of alpha -L-cladinose on position 3 of erythronolide A, having a three-keto function. Telithromycin (HMR 3647) is a ketolide that has been shown to have good in vitro activity against penicillin- and erythromycin-resistant pneumococci (1, 3, 7, 8).

In a previous study (6) designed to determine if the recent dramatic increase in incidence of drug-resistant pneumococci may be due in part to abuse of oral drugs, such as macrolides and cephalosporins, we found that sequential subcultures in subinhibitory concentrations of azithromycin (used to represent the macrolide group), cefuroxime, and cefaclor lead to increased pneumococcal MICs. Since repeated exposure to azithromycin readily selected for pneumococci with increased azithromycin MICs, we investigated how pneumococcal MICs were affected by repeated exposure to a ketolide (an alternate choice to macrolides in empiric therapy of pneumococcal infections), in comparison to other antibiotics of the macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin class (MLS). Specifically, we repeatedly exposed 11 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to subinhibitory concentrations of telithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin A, roxithromycin, clindamycin, and pristinamycin to determine if resistance developed.

Five strains were susceptible to erythromycin A (MICs <=  0.25 µg/ml), and six were erythromycin A resistant: three strains had mefE (erythromycin A MICs, 2 to 4 µg/ml) and three strains had ermB (erythromycin A MICs, >64 µg/ml). Antimicrobials were obtained from their respective manufacturers.

MICs were determined by a standardized microdilution methodology in Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco Laboratories) supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood (4). Susceptibility breakpoints were those approved by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (5): azithromycin, <= 0.5 µg/ml; clarithromycin, <= 0.25 µg/ml; erythromycin A, <= 0.25 µg/ml; and clindamycin, <= 0.25 µg/ml. The proposed susceptible breakpoint for telithromycin is <= 1 µg/ml (A. L. Barry, P. C. Fuchs, and S. D. Brown, Programs Abstr. Fourth Int. Conf. Macrolides, Azalides, Streptogramins Ketolides, abstr. 1.01, 1998). There are no roxithromycin and pristinamycin National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards breakpoints for S. pneumoniae. Daily passaging in subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotic for a maximum of 50 days was performed as published previously (6).

Resistant mutants were derived from parent strains as evidenced by (i) serotyping using the standard Quellung method with sera from Statens Seruminstitut (Copenhagen, Denmark) and (ii) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis using a CHEF DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) as published previously (6). Strains were checked for the presence of ermB and mefE by amplification by PCR using primers and cycling conditions as described by Sutcliffe et al. (9).

MIC results from subculturing in subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics are summarized in Table 1. Among the five macrolide-susceptible pneumococci, subculturing in telithromycin selected for two mutants, subculturing in pristinamycin selected for three mutants, subculturing in azithromycin, clarithromycin, and clindamycin selected for four mutants, and subculturing in erythromycin A and roxithromycin selected for mutants in all five strains. Among the three pneumococci containing mefE, subculturing in all the drugs led to selection of mutants with increased MICs in all three strains. The three pneumococci containing ermB were highly resistant to all the macrolides and clindamycin and, therefore, were subcultured only in telithromycin and pristinamycin. Among these three strains, subculturing in telithromycin and pristinamycin led to selection of mutants with increased MICs in all three strains.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Resistance selection results

Resistance was stable (MIC of passaged strains remained within one doubling dilution of MIC after 10 passages on antibiotic-free media), in most cases, among mutants derived from macrolide-susceptible parent strains and ermB-containing parent strains. In contrast, resistance was not stable among mutants derived from parent strains containing mefE. In these mutants, telithromycin and macrolide MICs usually reverted back to baseline MICs (or close to) after 10 passages on antibiotic-free media.

There were 54 mutants with elevated MICs to at least one of the antibiotics. Of these mutants, 3 were resistant to telithromycin (MICs >1 µg/ml), 20 were resistant to clindamycin (MICs >= 0.5 µg/ml), 36 were resistant to azithromycin (MICs >= 1 µg/ml), 37 were resistant to clarithromycin (MICs >= 0.5 µg/ml), 39 were resistant to erythromycin A (MICs >= 0.5 µg/ml), 45 had roxithromycin MICs of >= 0.5 µg/ml, and 20 had pristinamycin MICs of >= 1.0 µg/ml (Table 2). Macrolide-resistant mutants usually were still susceptible to telithromycin MICs (<= 0.25 µg/ml). Mutants with telithromycin MICs of >= 1 µg/ml were cross resistant to all macrolides (MICs >= 16 µg/ml). In most cases, exposure of strains to clindamycin or pristinamycin selected mutants with increased MICs to the selecting drug while the MICs to telithromycin and the macrolides remained unchanged or slightly higher.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Number of mutants (n = 54) with specific MICs to each of the antibiotics

Pneumococcal mutants (derived from subculturing in azithromycin) from a previous study of ours (6) have recently been analyzed. Resistance was determined to be caused by (i) mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA leading to ML, MS, or MLSB phenotypes, depending on the specific mutation and (ii) mutations in ribosomal protein L4 leading to an MS phenotype (A. Tait-Kamradt, T. Davies, M. Jacobs, P. Appelbaum, and J. Sutcliffe, Abstr. 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-0842, 1999). At least two of the four copies of the 23S rRNA genes needed to be mutated to see elevated macrolide MICs (Tait-Kamradt et al., 39th ICAAC, abstr. C-0842). Similar studies to determine the mechanisms of resistance among the mutants generated in this study are in progress.

The clinical significance of these in vitro studies recently became evident, as we have documented that macrolide resistance among some clinical pneumococcal strains can be caused by the same or similar ribosomal mutations as those observed in the in vitro studies. We found mutations in ribosomal protein L4 among several clinical strains of S. pneumoniae from Central and Eastern Europe (some clonally related) and mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA among a few recent U.S. clinical strains (A. Tait-Kamradt, T. Davies, L. Brennan, P. Depardieu, P. Courvalin, J. Duigan, J. Petitpas, L. Wondrack, M. Jacobs, P. Appelbaum, and J. Sutcliffe, Final Program, Abstr. Exhibits Addendum 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. abstr. LB-8, 1999). The relationship between this L4 clone and macrolide use in Central and Eastern Europe is unknown, but clearly these drugs are used on a large scale in many of these countries (W. Hyrniewicz, personal communication). Thus far, macrolide-resistant pneumococci from clinical specimens that do not have mef or erm genes are extremely rare (8; Hyrniewicz, personal communication). This study suggests that overuse and misuse of MLS agents could lead to an increase in the incidence of macrolide resistance among pneumococci (by either mef or erm genes or ribosomal mutations). The need for cautious and judicious use of antimicrobials for treatment of pneumococcal infections is warranted.

In summary, telithromycin has been shown to have good in vitro activity against strains containing mefE and ermB and against in vitro-selected mutants resistant to other macrolides, clindamycin, and pristinamycin. While exposure to telithromycin did select for pneumococcal mutants with increased MICs (most of which were still susceptible), it did so in the least number of strains, compared to the other MLS agents.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from Hoechst-Marion Roussel, Romainville, France.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033. Phone: (717) 531-5113. Fax: (717) 531-7953. E-mail: pappelbaum{at}psghs.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Barry, A. L., P. C. Fuchs, and S. D. Brown. 1998. Antipneumococcal activities of a ketolide (HMR 3647), a streptogramin (quinupristin-dalfopristin), a macrolide (erythromycin), and lincosamide (clindamycin). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:945-946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Johnston, N. J., J. C. DeAzavedo, J. D. Kellner, and D. E. Low. 1998. Prevalence and characterization of the mechanisms of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin resistance in isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2425-2426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Jones, R. N., and D. J. Biedenbach. 1997. Antimicrobial activity of RU-66647, a new ketolide. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27:7-12[CrossRef][Medline].
4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. M100-S8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
6. Pankuch, G. A., S. A. Jueneman, T. A. Davies, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1998. In vitro selection of resistance to four beta -lactams and azithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2914-2918[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Pankuch, G. A., M. A. Visalli, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 1998. Susceptibilities of penicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to HMR 3467 (RU 66647), a new ketolide, compared with susceptibilities to 17 other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:624-630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Reinert, R. R., A. Bryskier, and R. Lütticken. 1998. In vitro activities of the new ketolide antibiotics HMR 3004 and HMR 3647 against Streptococcus pneumoniae in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1509-1511[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Sutcliffe, J., T. Grebe, A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2562-2566[Abstract].


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2000, p. 414-417, Vol. 44, No. 2
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Siira, L., Rantala, M., Jalava, J., Hakanen, A. J., Huovinen, P., Kaijalainen, T., Lyytikainen, O., Virolainen, A. (2009). Temporal Trends of Antimicrobial Resistance and Clonality of Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Finland, 2002 to 2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2066-2073 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kosowska-Shick, K., Clark, C., Credito, K., Dewasse, B., Beachel, L., Ednie, L., Appelbaum, P. C. (2008). In Vitro Capability of Faropenem To Select for Resistant Mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 748-752 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clark, C. L., Kosowska-Shick, K., Ednie, L. M., Appelbaum, P. C. (2007). Capability of 11 Antipneumococcal Antibiotics To Select for Resistance by Multistep and Single-Step Methodologies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 4196-4201 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wolter, N., Smith, A. M., Low, D. E., Klugman, K. P. (2007). High-Level Telithromycin Resistance in a Clinical Isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1092-1095 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brook, I., Hausfeld, J. N. (2006). Effect of telithromycin and azithromycin on nasopharyngeal bacterial flora in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis.. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132: 442-445 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fogarty, C., de Wet, R., Mandell, L., Chang, J., Rangaraju, M., Nusrat, R. (2005). Five-Day Telithromycin Once Daily Is as Effective as 10-Day Clarithromycin Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis and Is Associated With Reduced Health-Care Resource Utilization. Chest 128: 1980-1988 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hisanaga, T., Hoban, D. J., Zhanel, G. G. (2005). Mechanisms of resistance to telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 447-450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reinert, R. R., Reinert, S., van der Linden, M., Cil, M. Y., Al-Lahham, A., Appelbaum, P. (2005). Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Eight European Countries from 2001 to 2003. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2903-2913 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kosowska, K., Hoellman, D. B., Lin, G., Clark, C., Credito, K., McGhee, P., Dewasse, B., Bozdogan, B., Shapiro, S., Appelbaum, P. C. (2005). Antipneumococcal Activity of Ceftobiprole, a Novel Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 1932-1942 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Matic, V., Kosowska, K., Bozdogan, B., Kelly, L. M., Smith, K., Ednie, L. M., Lin, G., Credito, K. L., Clark, C. L., McGhee, P., Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C. (2004). Antipneumococcal Activities of Two Novel Macrolides, GW 773546 and GW 708408, Compared with Those of Erythromycin, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Clindamycin, and Telithromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4103-4112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farrell, D J, Jenkins, S G, Reinert, R R (2004). Global distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes isolated from paediatric patients during 1999-2000 and the in vitro efficacy of telithromycin and comparators. J Med Microbiol 53: 1109-1117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Drago, L., De Vecchi, E., Nicola, L., Colombo, A., Gismondo, M. R. (2004). Selection of resistance of telithromycin against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and streptococci in comparison with macrolides. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 542-545 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reinert, R. R. (2004). Clinical efficacy of ketolides in the treatment of respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 918-927 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pereyre, S., Guyot, C., Renaudin, H., Charron, A., Bebear, C., Bebear, C. M. (2004). In Vitro Selection and Characterization of Resistance to Macrolides and Related Antibiotics in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 460-465 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Muller-Serieys, C., Andrews, J., Vacheron, F., Cantalloube, C. (2004). Tissue kinetics of telithromycin, the first ketolide antibacterial. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 149-157 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Walsh, F., Willcock, J., Amyes, S. (2003). High-level telithromycin resistance in laboratory-generated mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 345-353 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clark, J. P., Langston, E. (2003). Ketolides: A New Class of Antibacterial Agents for Treatment of Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in a Primary Care Setting. Mayo Clin Proc. 78: 1113-1124 [Abstract]  
  • Hsueh, P.-R., Teng, L.-J., Wu, T.-L., Yang, D., Huang, W.-K., Shyr, J.-M., Chuang, Y.-C., Wan, J.-H., Yan, J.-J., Lu, J.-J., Wu, J.-J., Ko, W.-C., Chang, F.-Y., Yang, Y.-C., Lau, Y.-J., Liu, Y.-C., Lee, C.-M., Leu, H.-S., Liu, C.-Y., Luh, K.-T. (2003). Telithromycin- and Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Taiwan with High Prevalence of Resistance to Macrolides and {beta}-Lactams: SMART Program 2001 Data. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2145-2151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reinert, R. R., Wild, A., Appelbaum, P., Lutticken, R., Cil, M. Y., Al-Lahham, A. (2003). Ribosomal Mutations Conferring Resistance to Macrolides in Streptococcus pneumoniae Clinical Strains Isolated in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2319-2322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goldstein, E. J. C., Citron, D. M., Merriam, C. V., Warren, Y., Tyrrel, K. L., Fernandez, H. (2003). In Vitro Activities of Telithromycin and 10 Oral Agents against Aerobic and Anaerobic Pathogens Isolated from Antral Puncture Specimens from Patients with Sinusitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1963-1967 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fogarty, C. M., Kohno, S., Buchanan, P., Aubier, M., Baz, M. (2003). Community-acquired respiratory tract infections caused by resistant pneumococci: clinical and bacteriological efficacy of the ketolide telithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 947-955 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ackermann, G., Rodloff, A. C. (2003). Drugs of the 21st century: telithromycin (HMR 3647)--the first ketolide. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 497-511 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clark, C., Bozdogan, B., Peric, M., Dewasse, B., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C. (2002). In Vitro Selection of Resistance in Haemophilus influenzae by Amoxicillin-Clavulanate, Cefpodoxime, Cefprozil, Azithromycin, and Clarithromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2956-2962 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Namour, F., Sultan, E., Pascual, M. H., Lenfant, B. (2002). Penetration of telithromycin (HMR 3647), a new ketolide antimicrobial, into inflammatory blister fluid following oral administration. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 1035-1038 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lim, J.-A., Kwon, A.-R., Kim, S.-K., Chong, Y., Lee, K., Choi, E.-C. (2002). Prevalence of resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin antibiotics in Gram-positive cocci isolated in a Korean hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 489-495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Canu, A., Malbruny, B., Coquemont, M., Davies, T. A., Appelbaum, P. C., Leclercq, R. (2002). Diversity of Ribosomal Mutations Conferring Resistance to Macrolides, Clindamycin, Streptogramin, and Telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 125-131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Morosini, M.-I., Canton, R., Loza, E., Negri, M.-C., Galan, J.-C., Almaraz, F., Baquero, F. (2001). In Vitro Activity of Telithromycin against Spanish Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates with Characterized Macrolide Resistance Mechanisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2427-2431 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hoban, D. J., Wierzbowski, A. K., Nichol, K., Zhanel, G. G. (2001). Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 1998-1999: Prevalence of mef(A) and erm(B) and Susceptibilities to Ketolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2147-2150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boos, M., Mayer, S., Fischer, A., Köhrer, K., Scheuring, S., Heisig, P., Verhoef, J., Fluit, A. C., Schmitz, F.-J. (2001). In Vitro Development of Resistance to Six Quinolones in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 938-942 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tait-Kamradt, A., Davies, T., Cronan, M., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C., Sutcliffe, J. (2000). Mutations in 23S rRNA and Ribosomal Protein L4 Account for Resistance in Pneumococcal Strains Selected In Vitro by Macrolide Passage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 2118-2125 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.