Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2000, p. 546-550, Vol. 44, No. 3
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Sensitive Amphotericin B Immunoassay for
Pharmacokinetic and Distribution Studies
Sophie
Machard,
Frederic
Theodoro,
Henri
Benech,
Jean-Marc
Grognet, and
Eric
Ezan*
CEA, Service de Pharmacologie et
d'Immunologie, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Received 15 March 1999/Returned for modification 11 September
1999/Accepted 2 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Since currently used assays of amphotericin B (AMB) lack
sensitivity or are not easily adaptable in all laboratories, we have developed an enzyme immunoassay for AMB in biological fluids and tissues. Antibodies to AMB were raised in rabbits after administration of an AMB-bovine serum albumin conjugate. The enzymatic tracer was
obtained by coupling AMB via its amino group to acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7). These reagents were used for the development of a
competitive immunoassay performed on microtitration plates. The limit
of quantification was 100 pg/ml in plasma and 1 ng/g in tissues. The
plasma assay was performed directly without extraction on a minimal
volume of 0.1 ml. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation
were in the range of 5 to 17%, and the recoveries were 92 to 111% for
AMB added to human plasma. The assay was applied to a pharmacokinetic
study with mice given AMB intraperitoneally at the dose of 1 mg/kg. The
drug distribution in selected compartments (plasma, liver, spleen,
lung, and brain) was monitored until 72 h after administration. In
conclusion, our assay is at least 100-fold more sensitive than
previously described bioassays or chromatographic determinations of AMB
and may be useful in studying the tissue pharmacokinetics of new AMB
formulations and in drug monitoring in clinical situations.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Amphotericin B (AMB) has been
considered for more than 30 years the major antifungal drug for serious
systemic fungal infections, which, owing to AIDS and improved organ
transplant immunosuppression drugs, are becoming tragically frequent in
immunocompromised individuals (12, 20). AMB's spectrum of
activity is broad, since antiviral or antiprion effects have also been
reported (12). The clinical value of AMB has been reinforced
by incorporation in lipid-based carriers, thus reducing its nephro- and
hematotoxicity, and these new formulations have been investigated in
animals and humans (4, 15, 25). In parallel with these
recent developments, a need arose for suitable analytical methods to
monitor AMB levels in tissue or plasma and thus establish
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships. Assays based on in
vitro biological activity or chromatographic separations have been
described and used to monitor AMB in the circulation (3, 11, 19,
22, 23). These methods, however, are characterized by a
relatively high limit of detection (>50 ng/ml) and by technological
limitations. These disadvantages may be potentially circumvented by
antibody-based technology, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for
AMB have been developed (6, 18). Although such techniques
allow direct assay in a small sample volume, they have not been applied
to tissues and have proved to be poorly sensitive since their limits of
quantification are above 150 ng/ml. In this report we describe the
development and application of a competitive enzyme immunoassay which
allows measurement of AMB in tissues and plasma with sensitivities
1,000-fold greater than those reported elsewhere. The assay is
performed with specific AMB antibodies raised in rabbits and an
enzymatic tracer of AMB.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents.
Common salts or solvents were of analytical grade
and were from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.) or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). AMB from Sigma or the sodium deoxycholate form (Fungizone;
Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Princeton, N.J.) was used. The substances used
for cross-reaction testing were flucytosine, griseofulvin, nystatin,
miconazole, and ketoconazole (Sigma) and penicillin and streptomycin
(Biockron, Berlin, Germany). Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (EC 3.1.1.7)
extracted from the electric organ of the Electrophorus
electricus eel was used as an enzymatic tracer. The purified
enzyme was obtained from Spi-Bio (Massy, France). Enzyme activities
were measured using Ellman's reagent, an AChE substrate comprising
2.2 g of acetylthiocholine and 1 g of dithionitrobenzene
(Sigma) in 200 ml of 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. One Ellman unit
is defined as the concentration of enzyme producing an absorbance
increase of 1 during 1 min in 1 ml of substrate medium for an optical
path length of 1 cm at 414 nm.
Immunogen preparation and immunization.
AMB was coupled to
bovine serum albumin and administered to rabbits in order to induce the
synthesis of antibodies as follows. AMB was dissolved in water at a
concentration of 14 mg/0.8 ml and incubated for 1 h at room
temperature with bovine serum albumin (fraction V; Sigma) (20 mg in 0.3 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) and 12 µl of 25%
glutaraldehyde (Merck) as a coupling agent. The control of coupling was
performed by elution of 0.1 ml of the mixture in molecular sieve
chromatography (G25; Pharmacia, St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France).
Absorbance measurement at 406 nm in fractions containing bovine serum
albumin and free AMB indicated that 1 mol of AMB was covalently coupled
to 1 mol of carrier protein. The immunogen was emulsified in an equal
volume of complete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma) and injected
intradermally at multiple sites on the backs of three adult male
rabbits, each weighing 2.5 kg (Blanc du Bouscat, Evic, France). Each
animal received 40 µg of coupled AMB at the first administration.
Booster injections (20 µg of coupled AMB in complete Freund's
adjuvant) were repeated every 2 months for 8 months. Rabbits were bled
from the central ear artery 10 and 20 days after booster injections.
Blood was centrifuged, and sera were stored in 0.1% sodium azide at
4°C. Antibody induction was tested by incubation of various dilutions (1/50 to 1/1,000) of the antisera with the enzymatic tracer AMB-AChE. The incubation was performed according to the procedure described in
"Enzyme immunoassay" below. The presence of antibody to AMB was
revealed when the signal obtained for bound tracer was twice that
obtained in the absence of antisera. The titer was the antibody dilution giving a bound tracer absorbance of 0.1 in 1 h.
Enzymatic tracer preparation.
Tracer was obtained by
conjugation of AMB to AChE. Thiol groups were first introduced into AMB
(0.46 mg) by reaction with succinimidyl-S-acetyl-thioacetate
(SATA) (Sigma; 1.1 mg in 40 µl of dimethylformamide). After
incubation for 30 min at 30°C, unreacted SATA was eliminated on a
C18 SepPak column (Waters, Milford, Mass.) previously
activated by methanol and water. The column was washed with 30 ml of
water, and AMB was eluted with methanol-water (80:20, vol/vol).
SATA-activated AMB was subsequently purified by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) using a C18 150- by 4.6-mm Kromasil
column (Touzart et Matignon, Vitry-sur-Seine, France) and a mobile
phase comprising triethylamine (pH 5.2)-acetonitrile-tetrahydrofurane (56:34:10, vol/vol/vol). Activated AMB (16 µg) was then diluted in
0.2 ml of 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 9), and thioester groups were
hydrolyzed by treatment with 20 µl of 1 M hydroxylamine for 15 min.
Thiol-containing AMB was mixed with AChE (0.1 nmol) previously activated with
N-succinimidyl-4-(N-maleimidomethyl)-cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (8) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The enzymatic tracer
was purified by molecular sieve chromatography using a 90- by 1.5-cm Bio-Gel A 1.5-m column (Bio-Rad, Paris, France) eluted with 0.1 M
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.4 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1%
bovine serum albumin, and 0.01% sodium azide. Two-milliliter fractions
were collected, and the peak exhibiting AChE activity was collected and
stored at
20°C.
Enzyme immunoassay.
Plasma samples were assayed without
extraction. For tissues, AMB was extracted as follows. Approximately
100 to 200 mg of tissues were taken from the animals and immediately
frozen in liquid nitrogen. Two milliliters of ice-cold methanol-water
(70:30: vol/vol) was added to 100 mg of tissue, and the mixture was
immediately homogenized mechanically for 30 s. One milliliter of
the homogenized tissue was then centrifuged for 30 min at
10,000 × g and 4°C. The supernatant was evaporated
with a rotary evaporator (Speed Vak; Jouan, Saint-Herblain, France) and
the dry residue was dissolved in human plasma (0.5 ml for 100 mg tissue
initially extracted) before assay. The assays were performed in 96-well
microtiter plates (Maxisorb; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) coated with mouse
monoclonal antibodies specific for rabbit immunoglobulins at a
concentration of 5 µg/ml in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (Spi-Bio,
Massy, France). The coating was performed for 18 h at room
temperature, and the plates were then saturated for 24 h at 4°C
with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA,
0.1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.01% sodium azide (enzyme immunoassay buffer). Before use, the coated plates were washed with 0.01 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (washing buffer) (300 µl/well and five wash cycles) (Autowasher 96; Labsystems, Eragny, France). Tracer (dilution of 1/100 from the stock preparation) and antiserum (bleeding 1487S4, diluted 1/300) were diluted in enzyme
immunoassay buffer. Standards (2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.062, and 0.031 ng/ml) and quality control samples were diluted in drug-free human
plasma (Etablissements de Transfusion Sanguine, Les Ulis, France). The
assay was performed in a total volume of 150 µl. Reagents were
dispensed as follows: 50 µl of sample, quality control, or standard
and 50 µl of antiserum. After incubation at room temperature for
24 h, the plates were washed as described above, and Ellman's
reagent (200 µl) was dispensed into each well and incubated in the
dark without agitation. After 2 to 5 h of enzymatic reaction, the
plate was read at 414 nm (Multiskan RC; Labsystems). Unknown
concentrations were calculated from a standard curve modeled with a
cubic spline transformation of the standard curve relating the
percentage of bound tracer (ordinate) to the log of the concentration
(abscissa) (Immunofit; Beckman, Gagny, France). All measurements for
standards and samples were made in duplicate.
Validation studies.
The specificity of the anti-AMB antibody
was determined by evaluating its ability to bind to various compounds
likely to be present with AMB in treated human subjects. The percent
cross-reactivity of each compound was calculated as the ratio between
the 50% inhibitory concentration of AMB and that of the tested
compound. The 50% inhibitory concentration was the concentration able
to displace by 50% the tracer-antibody binding in the absence of
competitor. Assay precision was estimated in terms of repeatability
(intraassay precision) and reproducibility (interassay precision).
Repeatability was estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV)
(standard deviation divided by the mean and multiplied by 100) for
quality control samples (drug-free human plasma spiked with AMB)
assayed eight times in the same run. Reproducibility was estimated by
the CV for the quality control samples assayed in five independent
assays. The relative accuracy of the assay was determined by measuring overlap for each of the quality control concentrations. Accuracy was
calculated as the ratio between measured and theoretical concentrations multiplied by 100. The limit of quantification of the assay was defined
as the concentration allowing good assay precision (CVs of
repeatability and reproducibility of less than 20%) and accuracy (accuracy ratio in the range of 85 of 115%). In order to establish assay specificity, we evaluated the recognition of AMB metabolites or
endogenous compounds by the antibodies. Thus, plasma or tissue extracts
from animals given AMB were fractionated by HPLC to establish if the
immunoreactivity corresponded to a single immunoreactive compound. The
HPLC consisted of a Kromazil C18 5-µm column (250 by 4.6 mm) (Touzart et Matignon) and a mobile phase comprising acetonitrile-0.01 M ammonium acetate (pH 4) (90:10, vol/vol) delivered at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The equipment consisted of HPLC pumps 600 (Waters) and a fraction collector (Roucaire, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). Plasma or tissue extracts (50 µl) were injected, and 1-min
fractions were collected and evaporated (Speed Vak). The dry extracts
were dissolved in human plasma before enzyme immunoassay.
Pharmacokinetics of AMB after administration of single doses to
mice.
Swiss mice from Iffa Credo (St-Germain sur l'Abresle,
France) were maintained on a 12-h light-dark cycle, with light from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., in a temperature (21 to 22°C)- and humidity (50% ± 10%)-controlled room. The mice were treated after a 1-week acclimation period, at which time their body weights were close to
25 g. Studies on animals complied with the Décret sur
l'Expérimentation Animale (French law on rules for animal
experimentation; decree 87-848, 19 October 1987). AMB (Fungizone)
diluted in sterile water was administered by the intraperitoneal route
at a dose of 1 mg/kg to 36 mice. At selected times (5 min, 30 min, and
1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h), four animals were sacrificed with
pentobarbital and their spleens, livers, lungs, and brains were
collected and immediately frozen until extraction. Blood was collected
from the aorta using a heparinized syringe and immediately centrifuged to obtain plasma, which was then stored at
20°C before assay. AMB
in plasma and tissue samples was measured by enzyme immunoassay, and
the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated for
each tissue and compared to that for plasma. Pharmacokinetic analysis
(AUC and elimination half-life) was performed on the mean values, since
the animals were sacrificed at each sampling time. The trapezoidal AUC
was determined between the first time and the last time (72 h). The
half-life was calculated between 24 and 72 h. The time to maximum
concentration (Tmax) corresponded to the time at
which the mean concentration reached its maximum (Cmax). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed
using Siphar software (Simed, Créteil, France).
 |
RESULTS |
Since AMB is not immunogenic per se, it was coupled to a carrier
protein through its amino group in order to raise antibodies in
rabbits. The immunizations allowed the preparation of antisera containing antibodies specific to AMB, and bleedings were selected according to their affinities by binding inhibition studies. The specificity of the selected antiserum (1487S4) was tested against various antifungal agents and structurally related compounds
(flucytosine, griseofulvin, nystatin, miconazole, ketoconazole, and
penicillin). No interference (cross-reactivity of less than 0.01%) was
seen with any tested compound except nystatin (cross-reactivity of 250%), which is structurally related to AMB. The concentrations of
reagents (antiserum and tracer) were optimized after immunological incubations at 4°C. The best conditions were those described in Materials and Methods. Assay precision and accuracy were evaluated by
measuring intra- and interday variabilities and the recovery of AMB
added to plasma and tissue. As shown in Table
1, mean variabilities were 5% (intraday)
and 15% (interday) for concentrations of above 100 pg/ml. The mean
recovery was 103 ± 8% in the interday experiments. Intra- and
interday variabilities were between 9 and 26% for mouse lung and brain
tissue spiked with AMB at the concentration of 20 ng/g. These data
allowed us to fix the limit of quantification of AMB in plasma at 0.1 ng/ml. This indicates an LOQ of 1 ng/g in tissue, since in our
extraction protocol 50 mg of tissue was processed (centrifuged,
evaporated, and reconstituted in 0.5 ml of plasma). Because of the
tissue extraction protocol, the limit of quantification in tissues was
set at 1 ng/g when 100 mg of tissue was initially extracted.
The assay was used in pharmacokinetic studies with mice given AMB at
the dose of 1 mg/kg. AMB was measured in plasma and selected tissues.
The pharmacokinetic profiles are shown Fig.
1. AMB could be measured in all
compartments until the last sampling time. The estimated
pharmacokinetic parameters are presented in Table 2. In plasma, AMB was quickly absorbed,
with a maximum concentration of 340 ng/ml 1 h after
administration. The half-life of the terminal phase was 28.3 h.
AMB was mostly found in spleen and liver and to a lesser extent in
lung. In these tissues and also in plasma, an initial peak was observed
30 to 60 min after administration, followed by a second peak 8 h
after administration. In spleen, the AMB concentration plateaued until
the last sampling time, i.e., 72 h. In other tissues, the AMB
elimination half-lives ranged between 15.5 and 72.5 h. In brain,
AMB concentrations were lower than in other tissues, especially in the
first hours. After 24 h, concentrations in brain were close to
those in plasma. The AUC for brain between 0 and 72 h was 5-fold
lower than that for lung and 10-fold lower than those for spleen and
liver.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Pharmacokinetic profiles of AMB in mice after
administration of AMB at the dose of 1 mg/kg by the intraperitoneal
route. Each point is the mean for four animals.
|
|
In order to estimate assay specificity and the potential interference
of AMB metabolites or endogenous compounds with the antibodies, a pool
of plasma or tissue obtained 48 h after AMB administration in mice
was fractionated by HPLC, and the fractions collected were enzyme
immunoassayed (Fig. 2). Tissues were
extracted before HPLC. Most immunoreactivity was eluted at a time
corresponding to the elution time of AMB (14 to 18 min). For liver and
spleen, more polar immunoreactive compounds were recovered. The ratios of metabolite immunoreactivity to total immunoreactivity were 14 and
7% for liver and spleen, respectively. Since calibration of the
chromatographic column with AMB added to mouse plasma revealed only a
single immunoreactive peak, the immunoreactivity may represent an AMB
metabolite recognized by the antibodies.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Immunochromatographic profiles of mouse samples taken
48 h after administration of AMB at the dose of 1 mg/kg by the
intraperitoneal route. (A) Plasma; (B) liver; (C) spleen. The elution
time of synthetic AMB spiked in drug-free plasma was 14 to 18 min.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Pharmacokinetic evaluations of AMB in preclinical and clinical
studies support the development of new and less toxic AMB formulations (1, 13). AMB assays may be valuable in at least two
situations: distribution studies with animals and monitoring of
patients in order to correlate drug concentration and clinical outcome.
The challenge of designing highly sensitive AMB assays that are easy to
perform has led to the development of AMB immunoassays (6,
18). Those authors adopted a format of enzyme-linked immunsorbent
assay in which AMB to be assayed competes with AMB absorbed on a solid
surface for specific antibodies. These assays were satisfactory in
terms of specificity and accuracy but were relatively insensitive,
since their limit of detection was above 150 ng/ml. In our assay, we
adopted a competitive format in which AMB antibodies are immunoabsorbed
onto the wells of a microtiter plate. To each well is added a fixed
amount of the enzymatic tracer and either known standards or samples.
The amount of tracer bound to the antibodies is inversely proportional
to the quantity of AMB present in the standard or sample.
Quantification of the enzyme label allows measurement of the sample
concentration from the standard curve. The use of high-affinity
antibodies and AChE, which has a high turnover, led to an assay with a
limit of quantification of 100 pg/ml, i.e., 1,500-fold better than
those previously achieved (6, 18). Our assay may be
performed in less than 24 h, does not require an extraction step
for plasma, and may be easily applied by any laboratory familiar with
immunoassays. The accuracy and precision after repeated intra- or
interday AMB measurement indicate performance suitable for
pharmacokinetic studies. Among drugs and endogenous compounds tested
for cross-reactivity, only nystatin was recognized by the antibodies.
This would be a problem only if nystatin was previously administered by
the parenteral route, since this compound administered by the oral or
topical route is not absorbed and not present in the circulation
(6).
Investigation of assay specificity by HPLC fractionation of tissue
samples revealed that the antibodies could detect one or several AMB
metabolites. Cross-reacting compounds interfered little with assay
accuracy, since, and at least with our samples, they represented less
than 15% of the total immunoreactivity recovered. Renal excretion of
AMB is minor, indicating that AMB probably undergoes metabolization,
although no metabolites have been identified so far (14).
Our antibodies may therefore be applicable to the selective extraction
of cross-reacting metabolites, thus enabling further identification.
Despite numerous articles addressing the pharmacokinetics of AMB,
studies of its distribution in tissue are limited by the poor
sensitivity of the analytical techniques currently used. There are,
however, data indicating that AMB is distributed mainly in liver and
spleen, with concentrations 5 to 10 times those encountered in other
tissues, such as lung and kidney (10, 24). In postmortem studies with humans, 6% and 14 to 20% of the total dose were
recovered in spleen and liver, respectively (10). The
present pharmacokinetic study examined the usefulness of our assay in
specifying the drug distribution in tissue. We defined the AMB kinetic
profile over 72 h after administration. AMB pharmacokinetics were
characterized by rapid uptake from tissues. As expected, we found that
administration of AMB resulted in high concentrations in liver and
spleen and lower concentrations in lung. AMB was cleared more rapidly
from plasma and lung than from other tissues, indicating that after distribution to the tissues, AMB may be released at different and
delayed rates.
Although brain penetration has been reported (5, 9, 17), the
concentrations observed were close to the limit of the quantification
of the chromatographic techniques used to monitor the tissue
concentrations. Compared to that in other tissues, AMB penetration in
brain was slower and reduced, since the maximum concentration was
observed later and levels were 10- to 20-fold lower than those in
spleen and liver. Contamination of brain tissue by AMB present in blood
capillaries could not be excluded, but its importance should be
minimized since there is less than 3% blood in rodent brain
(16), a value much lower than the brain/blood ratio (70%)
observed in our study. A second, indirect argument is that kinetics in
plasma and brain are not parallel, at least for the first sampling times.
The possibility of monitoring low brain AMB concentrations, in order to
compare the different formulations pharmacokinetically, is of
particular interest in view of a recent study in which the relative
efficiencies of three AMB lipid formulations were compared in the
treatment of systemic murine cryptococcosis, a model whose primary
target is infection of the central nervous system (7). These
formulations displayed organ-specific differences, particularly in the
brain. Monitoring of AMB brain penetration is also potentially interesting since this drug prolongs the course of experimental prion
diseases and modifies the kinetics of abnormal prion protein accumulation in the central nervous system (2). The
mechanism of action is unclear, and hypotheses involving the disruption of membrane structures or the inhibition of the conversion of the prion
protein into an abnormal form in the central nervous system may require
quantification of the drug at these putative sites of action.
Besides the potential advantages of AMB enzyme immunoassay in studies
of tissue pharmacokinetics, as demonstrated here, the technique should
also be useful in the clinical laboratory for monitoring patients on
antifungal therapy. The pharmacokinetic rationale for adapting dosage
in order to influence clinical outcome has been reviewed elsewhere
(21). So far this is partly limited by the fact that
currently used AMB bioassays and chromatographic methods require
specific equipment not available in all clinical centers, disadvantages
that may be circumvented by the assay presented here.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: CEA, Service de
Pharmacologie et d'Immunologie, CE-Saclay, F-91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. Phone: 33-1-69-08-73-50. Fax: 33-1-69-08-59-07. E-mail: ezan{at}dsvidf.cea.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adedoyin, A.,
J. F. Bernardo,
C. E. Swenson,
L. E. Bolsack,
G. Horwith,
S. DeWit,
E. Kelly,
J. Klasterksy,
J. P. Sculier,
D. DeValeriola,
E. Anaissie,
G. Lopez-Berestein,
A. Lluanos-Cuentas,
A. Boyle, and R. A. Branch.
1997.
Pharmacokinetic profile of ABELCET (amphotericin B lipid complex injection): combined experience from phase I and phase II studies.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:2201-2208[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Adjou, K. T.,
J.-P. Deslys,
R. Demaimay, and D. Dormont.
1997.
Probing the dynamics of prion diseases with amphotericin B.
Trends Microbiol.
5:27-31[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bannatyne, R. M.,
R. Cheung, and H. R. Devlin.
1977.
Microassay for amphotericin B.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:44-46.
|
| 4.
|
Boswell, G. W.,
D. Buell, and I. Bekersky.
1998.
AmBisome (liposomal amphotericin B): a comparative review.
J. Clin. Pharmacol.
38:583-592[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Clark, J. M.,
R. R. Withney,
S. J. Olsen,
R. J. George,
M. S. Swerdel,
L. Kunselman, and D. J. Bonner.
1991.
Amphotericin B lipid complex therapy of experimental fungal infections in mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:615-621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cleary, J. D.,
S. W. Chapman,
J. Deng, and C. J. Lobb.
1996.
Amphotericin B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:637-641[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Clemons, K. V., and D. A. Stevens.
1998.
Comparison of Fungizone, Amphotec, AmBisome, and Abelcet for treatment of systemic murine cryptococcosis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:899-902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Duhau, L.,
J. Grassi,
D. Grousselle,
A. Enjalbert, and J. M. Grognet.
1991.
An enzyme immunoassay for rat prolactin: application to the determination of plasma levels.
J. Immunoassay
12:233-250[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Fielding, R. M.,
A. W. Singer,
L. H. Wang,
S. Babbar, and L. S. S. Guo.
1992.
Relationship of pharmacokinetics and drug distribution in tissue to increased safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in dogs.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
26:299-307.
|
| 10.
|
Gradoni, L.,
R. N. Davidson,
S. Orsini,
P. Betto, and M. Giambenedetti.
1993.
Activity of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) against Leishmania infantum and tissue distribution in mice.
J. Drug Target
1:311-316[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Granich, G. G.,
G. S. Kobayashi, and D. J. Krogstad.
1986.
Sensitive high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay for amphotericin B which incorporates an international standard.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
29:584-588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Hartsel, S., and J. Bolard.
1996.
Amphotericin B: new life for an old drug.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
17:445-447[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Heinemann, V.,
B. Kahny,
J. Ulrich,
D. Muhlbayer,
A. Debus,
K. Wachholz,
D. Bosse,
H. J. Kolb, and W. Wilmanns.
1997.
Serum pharmacology of amphotericin B applied in lipid emulsions.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:728-732[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Janknegt, R.,
S. de Marie,
I. A. Bakker-Woudenberg, and D. J. Crommelin.
1992.
Liposomal and lipid formulations of amphotericin B.
Clin. Pharmacokinet.
23:279-291[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Johnson, E. M.,
J. O. Ojwang,
A. Szekely,
T. L. Wallace, and D. W. Warnock.
1998.
Comparison of in vitro antifungal activities of free and liposome-encapsulated nystatin with those of four amphotericin B formulations.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:1412-1416[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Khor, S. P., and M. Mayersohn.
1991.
Potential error in the measurement of tissue to blood distribution coefficients in physiological pharmacokinetic modeling.
Drug Metab. Dispos.
19:478-485[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Lee, J. W.,
M. A. Amantea,
P. A. Francis,
E. E. Navarro,
J. Bacher,
P. A. Pizzo, and T. J. Walsh.
1994.
Pharmacokinetics and safety of unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in rabbits.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38:713-718[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Little, J. R.,
K. D. Little,
E. Plut,
M. Koldin, and G. S. Kobayashi.
1984.
Induction of amphotericin B-specific antibodies for use in immunoassays.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
26:824-828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Lopez-Galera, R.,
L. Pou-Clave, and C. Pascual-Mostaza.
1995.
Determination of amphotericin B in human serum by liquid chromatography.
J. Chromatogr.
674:298-300.
|
| 20.
|
Martino, P., and C. Girmenia.
1997.
Are we making progress in antifungal therapy?
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
9:314-320[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Nagata, M. P.,
C. A. Gentry, and E. M. Hampton.
1996.
Is there a therapeutic or pharmacokinetic rationale for amphotericin B dosing in systemic Candida infections?
Ann. Pharmacother.
30:811-818[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Ng, T. K. C.,
C. Y. Chan,
F. A. B. Adeyemi-Doro,
S. W. Cheung, and A. F. B. Cheng.
1996.
Rapid high performance liquid chromamtographic assay for antifungal agents in human sera.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:465-472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Polikandritou Lambros, M.,
S. Ali Abbas, and D. W. A. Bourne.
1996.
New high-performance liquid chromatographic method for amphotericin B analysis using an internal standard.
J. Chromatogr.
685:135-140.
|
| 24.
|
Van Etten, E. W. M.,
M. Otte-Lambillion,
W. Van Vianen,
M. T. ten Kate, and I. A. J. Bakker-Woudenbert.
1995.
Biodistribution of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B-desoxycholate (Fungizone) in uninfected immunocompetent mice and leucopenic mice infected with Candida albicans.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
35:509-519[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Wong-Beringer, A.,
R. A. Jacobs, and B. J. Guglielmo.
1998.
Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: clinical efficacy and toxicities.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
27:603-618[Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2000, p. 546-550, Vol. 44, No. 3
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.