This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grucz, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grucz, R. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2000, p. 1062-1066, Vol. 44, No. 4
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin, Vancomycin, Linezolid, and Quinupristin-Dalfopristin against Staphylococci and Enterococci, Including Vancomycin- Intermediate and -Resistant Strains

Michael J. Rybak,* Ellie Hershberger, Tabitha Moldovan, and Richard G. Grucz

The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital/University Health Center, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Received 26 March 1999/Returned for modification 1 August 1999/Accepted 19 December 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The in vitro activity of daptomycin was compared with those of vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin against a variety (n = 203) of gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis (MRSA and MRSE, respectively), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA). Overall, daptomycin was more active against all organisms tested, except Enterococcus faecium and VISA, against which its activity was similar to that of quinupristin-dalfopristin. In time-kill studies with MRSA, MRSE, VRE, and VISA, daptomycin demonstrated greater bactericidal activity than all other drugs tested, killing >= 3 log CFU/ml by 8 h. Daptomycin may be a potential alternative drug therapy for multidrug-resistant gram-positive organisms and warrants further investigation.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Daptomycin is a cyclic polypeptide derived from Streptomyces roseosporus and representing a class of antimicrobial agents known as the peptolides (acid lipopeptide antibiotics) (3). The spectrum of activity is similar to those of vancomycin and teicoplanin, with activity against a wide variety of aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Daptomycin is also active against vancomycin-resistant gram-positive bacteria, including enterococci (4, 5, 7). The mechanism of action differs from that of the glycopeptides, involving the disruption of amino acid transport by the cell membrane and alterations of the cytoplasmic membrane potential (1-3). The bactericidal activity of daptomycin is concentration dependent and is influenced by pH and ionized calcium concentrations (9). Like teicoplanin, daptomycin is highly protein bound (94%), and its in vitro activity is altered in the presence of serum or albumin. However, even in the presence of serum, the activity of daptomycin is superior to that of vancomycin or teicoplanin (6, 11). In early clinical trials, daptomycin was efficacious in patients with skin and skin structure infections and bacteremia at dosages of 2 to 3 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h (investigator's brochure, Eli Lilly & Co.). However, clinical trials were suspended when treatment failures were noted in patients with S. aureus endocarditis (Eli Lilly & Co., personal communication). Possible reasons for failure included the high degree of protein binding and the degree of penetration into cardiac vegetations (9). Experimental animal endocarditis studies replicating clinical trial dosages and achievable concentrations demonstrated that slightly higher dosage regimens of daptomycin were as effective as or more effective than vancomycin in reducing vegetative bacterial densities (8). Recently, renewed interest in daptomycin has occurred secondarily to the need for new agents with activity against vancomycin-resistant organisms, including enterococci. Our objectives were to reevaluate the bactericidal activity of daptomycin compared to those of vancomycin, the oxazolidinone linezolid, and the streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin against various gram-positive organisms.

(This work was presented in part at the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.)

Bacterial strains. The 203 gram-positive organisms used consisted of the following: 100 S. aureus isolates, 50 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 50 MRSA, and 3 vancomycin-intermediate-susceptible S. aureus (VISA). The 50 coagulase-negative staphylococci consisted of 25 methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis (MSSE) isolates and 25 methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). The 50 enterococci consisted of 25 Enterococcus faecalis isolates and 25 E. faecium (20 of these isolates were resistant to vancomycin). MICs were also determined by use of a standard reference strain of S. aureus (ATCC 25923) with all antibiotics at baseline and during each susceptibility test for quality assurance purposes.

Antibiotics. Daptomycin (Eli Lilly & Co. lot no. RS0113) was supplied by Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. Vancomycin susceptibility-grade powder was purchased commercially (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Linezolid susceptibility-grade powder (lot 5014-TJF-490 A) was supplied by Pharmacia and Upjohn, Inc., (Kalamazoo, Mich.), and quinupristin-dalfopristin susceptibility-grade powder (lot 9609410) was supplied by Rhone-Poulenc Rorer (Collegeville, Pa.).

MIC and MBC determinations. The MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined for each isolate in duplicate by a microdilution technique with Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with calcium (25 mg/liter) and magnesium (12.5 mg/liter) (SMHB) for vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin. Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with calcium at 75 mg/liter (physiological ionized Ca2+ concentration) and magnesium at 12.5 mg/liter (SMHB-PCA) was always used for microdilution susceptibility testing of daptomycin. The MIC and MBC of daptomycin were also determined with a subset of each organism (n = 22) and a 50:50 mixture of pooled human serum and SMHB-PCA. Susceptibility testing for each drug was performed in quadruplicate according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (10).

Killing curves. The bactericidal activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were compared by use of killing curve analyses with four representative clinical isolates (R499, an MRSA; MU50, a VISA; R227, an MRSE; and R588, a vancomycin-resistant enterococcus [VRE] [E. faecalis]). Three to five colonies from overnight growth on tryptic soy agar at 35°C were added to normal saline and adjusted as necessary to produce a 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of organisms. This suspension was diluted appropriately (1:10) with SMHB (SMHB-PCA for daptomycin) to achieve an inoculum of 107 CFU/ml. A 0.2-ml suspension of an organism was added to 1.7 ml of SMHB (final inoculum, 106 CFU/ml) with a 0.1-ml stock solution of each antibiotic at concentrations one and four times the MICs for the respective organism in a 24-well tissue culture plate (final volume, 2.0 ml per well). Culture wells were incubated at 35°C with constant shaking for 24 h. Samples (0.1 ml) were removed at 0, 8, and 24 h; appropriately diluted with cold 0.9% sodium chloride to reduce antibiotic carryover; plated onto tryptic soy agar (Difco) with an Autoplate Spiral Diluter (model 3000; Spiral Bioscience, Frederick, Md.); and incubated at 35°C for 24 h. The limit of detection for this method is 250 CFU/plate, corresponding to 2.5 log10 CFU/ml. Growth control wells for each organism were prepared without antibiotic and run in parallel to the antibiotic test wells. Killing curves were also determined with daptomycin at a concentration four times the MIC in SMHB-PCA and SMHB-PCA with pooled human serum (50:50) against the four representative isolates mentioned above. All time-kill curve experiments were performed in triplicate.

The drug activities are reported in Table 1. Against MSSA and MRSA, daptomycin activity was approximately 8- to 30-fold greater than those of all other agents. The activity of daptomycin against MSSE and MRSE was equal to that of quinupristin-dalfopristin and 2- to 16-fold greater than those of vancomycin and linezolid. Against VISA, quinupristin-dalfopristin was the most active agent, followed by daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin. The activity of daptomycin against both vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant E. faecalis was greater than those of all other agents tested. The activity of daptomycin against both vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant E. faecium was equal to that of quinupristin-dalfopristin and greater than those of all other agents tested. On average, the MICs of daptomycin in the presence of 50% serum against MSSA (n = 4), MRSA (n = 4), MSSE (n = 4), MRSE (n = 4), E. faecium (n = 5), and VISA (n = 1) increased one- to eightfold, while serum had no effect on the MICs of linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, or vancomycin (data not shown). In time-kill studies, at the MIC, killing was minimal and regrowth occurred for all agents (data not shown). At concentrations four times the MIC, daptomycin and vancomycin achieved 99.9% killing of MRSA in 8 h, which was greater than the killing seen with linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin (P, <0.05) (Fig. 1). Against VRE at 8 and 24 h, daptomycin had greater activity than linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin (P, <0.05). Against MRSE, daptomycin, vancomycin, and quinupristin-dalfopristin had greater activity than linezolid early (P, <0.05); however, no differences were observed between the regimens at 24 h. All antibiotics tested achieved 99.9% killing of the VISA isolate by 24 h. The addition of pooled human serum to SMHB-PCA significantly (P, <0.05) decreased the activity of daptomycin. However, killing activity was significantly improved when the daptomycin concentration was adjusted according to the MIC obtained in SMHB-PCA plus pooled human serum; data are shown for two of the isolates (Fig. 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Activities of daptomycin (D), vancomycin (V), linezolid (L), and quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) against various bacterial strains



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Time-kill experiments performed at four times the MIC against MRSA R499 (A), VISA 992 (B), VRE R588 (E. faecalis) (C), and MRSE R227 (D). Results are means ± standard deviations. GC, growth control; D, daptomycin; V, vancomycin; L, linezolid; Q-D, quinupristin-dalfopristin. MICs of D, V, L, and Q-D, respectively, were as follows: for R499, 0.125, 0.5, 2.0, and 0.25; for 992, 0.5, 8.0, 2.0, and 0.25; for R588, 1.0, 128.0, 4.0, and 2.0; and for R277, 0.25, 1.0, 4.0, and 0.06.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   (A) Time-kill experiments performed with daptomycin in broth and in broth plus pooled human serum (PHS) at four times the MIC against VRE 588. A superscript "A" indicates the MIC determined in SMHB-PCA (MIC, 1.0 µg/ml). A superscript "B" indicates the MIC determined in SMHB-PCA plus PHS (MIC, 2.0 µg/ml). (B) Time-kill experiments performed with daptomycin in broth and in broth plus PHS at four times the MIC against VISA 992. A superscript "A" indicates the MIC determined in SMHB-PCA (MIC, 0.5 µg/ml). A superscript "B" indicates the MIC determined in SMHB-PCA plus PHS (MIC, 1.0 µg/ml).

Daptomycin represents a unique semisynthetic antimicrobial agent with activity against a broad range of gram-positive pathogens, including VRE and vancomycin-resistant staphylococci. Unlike those of many other agents, the activity of daptomycin is bactericidal for staphylococci and enterococci and is concentration dependent. The activity of daptomycin in the presence of serum is decreased because of its high degree of protein binding; however, its activity is improved when concentrations are equal to or greater than four times the MIC (achieved clinically). This conclusion was supported by the killing curves determined in the presence of serum for VRE but to a lesser extent for the VISA isolate. Our susceptibility data are similar to those reported by others previously for gram-positive organisms, including more recent data against newer pathogens, such as VRE and VISA (N. V. Jacobus, B. Goldin, L. McDermott, and D. R. Snydman, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., p. F-113, 1998; N. V. Jacobus, L. McDermott, J. R. Lonks, J. M. Boyce, and D. R. Snydman, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., p. F-112, 1998). The primary mechanism of action of daptomycin relies heavily on ionized calcium content. The difference in the activities of daptomycin in SMHB (9) and in SMHB-PCA is notable and should be considered when one is determining MICs of this drug. Although early studies with daptomycin were not successful at low doses for patients with endocarditis, based upon the long serum half-life of 8.5 h and the dose-dependent postantibiotic effect of 1 to 6 h, it is likely that this drug could achieve success if given once daily. Newly proposed dosing for daptomycin at 4 and 6 mg/kg/day, administered once daily, should achieve serum concentrations necessary to improve the activity of the drug for a variety of gram-positive organisms.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from Cubist Pharmaceuticals.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital/University Health Center, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201. Phone: (313) 745-4554. Fax: (313) 993-2522. E-mail: mrybak{at}dmc.org.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Alborn, W. E., Jr., N. E. Allen, and D. A. Preston. 1991. Daptomycin disrupts membrane potential in growing Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2282-2287[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Allen, N. E., W. E. Alborn, Jr., and J. N. Hobbs, Jr. 1991. Inhibition of membrane potential-dependent amino acid transport by daptomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2639-2642[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Allen, N. E., J. N. Hobbs, and W. E. Alborn. 1987. Inhibition of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in gram-positive bacteria by LY146032. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:1093-1099[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Bush, L. M., J. A. Boscia, and D. Kaye. 1988. Daptomycin (LY146032) treatment of experimental enterococcal endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32:877-881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Eliopoulos, G. M., S. Willey, E. Reiszner, P. G. Spitzer, G. Caputo, and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 1986. In vitro and in vivo activity of LY146032, a new cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 30:532-535[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Garrison, M. W., K. Vance-Bryan, T. A. Larson, J. P. Toscano, and J. C. Rotschafer. 1990. Assessment of effects of protein binding on daptomycin and vancomycin killing of Staphylococcus aureus by using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1925-1931[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Jones, R. N., and A. L. Barry. 1987. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of LY146032, a new lipopeptide antibiotic, including susceptibility testing recommendations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:625-629[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Kaatz, G. W., S. M. Seo, V. N. Reddy, E. M. Bailey, and M. J. Rybak. 1990. Daptomycin compared with teicoplanin and vancomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:2081-2085[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Lamp, K. C., and M. J. Rybak. 1993. Teicoplanin and daptomycin bactericidal activities in the presence of albumin or serum under controlled conditions of pH and ionized calcium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:605-609[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1998. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. M7-A3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
11. Rybak, M. J., E. M. Bailey, K. C. Lamp, and G. W. Kaatz. 1992. Pharmacokinetics and bactericidal rates of daptomycin and vancomycin in intravenous drug abusers being treated for gram-positive endocarditis and bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1109-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2000, p. 1062-1066, Vol. 44, No. 4
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Swenson, J. M., Anderson, K. F., Lonsway, D. R., Thompson, A., McAllister, S. K., Limbago, B. M., Carey, R. B., Tenover, F. C., Patel, J. B. (2009). Accuracy of Commercial and Reference Susceptibility Testing Methods for Detecting Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2013-2017 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moise, P. A, Hershberger, E., Amodio-Groton, M. I, Lamp, K. C (2009). Safety and Clinical Outcomes when Utilizing High-Dose (>=8 mg/kg) Daptomycin Therapy. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 43: 1211-1219 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McKay, G. A., Beaulieu, S., Arhin, F. F., Belley, A., Sarmiento, I., Parr, T. Jr, Moeck, G. (2009). Time-kill kinetics of oritavancin and comparator agents against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 1191-1199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bubalo, J. S., Munar, M. Y., Cherala, G., Hayes-Lattin, B., Maziarz, R. (2009). Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics in Adult Oncology Patients with Neutropenic Fever. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 428-434 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Seaton, R. A. (2008). Daptomycin: rationale and role in the management of skin and soft tissue infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: iii15-iii23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rose, W. E., Leonard, S. N., Rybak, M. J. (2008). Evaluation of Daptomycin Pharmacodynamics and Resistance at Various Dosage Regimens against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Reduced Susceptibilities to Daptomycin in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 3061-3067 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Attwood, R. J., LaPlante, K. L. (2007). Telavancin: A novel lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent. Am J Health Syst Pharm 64: 2335-2348 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mortin, L. I., Li, T., Van Praagh, A. D. G., Zhang, S., Zhang, X.-X., Alder, J. D. (2007). Rapid Bactericidal Activity of Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Peritonitis in Mice as Measured with Bioluminescent Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1787-1794 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • French, G. L. (2006). Bactericidal agents in the treatment of MRSA infections--the potential role of daptomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 1107-1117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Diederen, B. M. W., van Duijn, I., Willemse, P., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. (2006). In Vitro Activity of Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Including Heterogeneously Glycopeptide-Resistant Strains.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3189-3191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jevitt, L. A., Thorne, G. M., Traczewski, M. M., Jones, R. N., McGowan, J. E. Jr., Tenover, F. C., Brown, S. D. (2006). Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest and Disk Diffusion Methods for Differentiating Daptomycin-Susceptible from Non-Daptomycin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3098-3104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Green, M. R, Anasetti, C., Sandin, R. L, Rolfe, N. E, Greene, J. N (2006). Development of daptomycin resistance in a bone marrow transplant patient with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus durans. J Oncol Pharm Pract 12: 179-181 [Abstract]  
  • Leuthner, K. D., Cheung, C. M., Rybak, M. J. (2006). Comparative activity of the new lipoglycopeptide telavancin in the presence and absence of serum against 50 glycopeptide non-susceptible staphylococci and three vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 58: 338-343 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jorgensen, J. H., Crawford, S. A. (2006). Assessment of Two Commercial Susceptibility Test Methods for Determination of Daptomycin MICs.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2126-2129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Skiest, D. J. (2006). Treatment Failure Resulting from Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to Daptomycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 655-656 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Long, J. K., Choueiri, T. K., Hall, G. S., Avery, R. K., Sekeres, M. A. (2005). Daptomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc. 80: 1215-1216 [Abstract]  
  • Dehghanyar, P., Burger, C., Zeitlinger, M., Islinger, F., Kovar, F., Muller, M., Kloft, C., Joukhadar, C. (2005). Penetration of Linezolid into Soft Tissues of Healthy Volunteers after Single and Multiple Doses. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2367-2371 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schriever, C. A., Fernandez, C., Rodvold, K. A., Danziger, L. H. (2005). Daptomycin: A novel cyclic lipopeptide antimicrobial. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62: 1145-1158 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Steenbergen, J. N., Alder, J., Thorne, G. M., Tally, F. P. (2005). Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 283-288 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lipsky, B. A., Stoutenburgh, U. (2005). Daptomycin for treating infected diabetic foot ulcers: evidence from a randomized, controlled trial comparing daptomycin with vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins for complicated skin and skin-structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 240-245 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Veligandla, S. R, Louie, K. R, Malesker, M. A, Smith, P. W (2004). Muscle Pain Associated with Daptomycin. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 1860-1862 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cottagnoud, P., Pfister, M., Acosta, F., Cottagnoud, M., Flatz, L., Kuhn, F., Muller, H.-P., Stucki, A. (2004). Daptomycin Is Highly Efficacious against Penicillin-Resistant and Penicillin- and Quinolone-Resistant Pneumococci in Experimental Meningitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 3928-3933 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lai, J.-J., Brodeur, S. K (2004). Physical and Chemical Compatibility of Daptomycin with Nine Medications. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 1612-1616 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Razonable, R. R., Osmon, D. R., Steckelberg, J. M. (2004). Linezolid Therapy for Orthopedic Infections. Mayo Clin Proc. 79: 1137-1144 [Abstract]  
  • Fluit, A. C., Schmitz, F.-J., Verhoef, J., Milatovic, D. (2004). In Vitro Activity of Daptomycin against Gram-Positive European Clinical Isolates with Defined Resistance Determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 1007-1011 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kaneko, Y., Yanagihara, K., Miyazaki, Y., Tsukamoto, K., Hirakata, Y., Tomono, K., Kadota, J.-i., Tashiro, T., Murata, I., Kohno, S. (2003). Effects of DQ-113, a New Quinolone, against Methicillin- and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Caused Hematogenous Pulmonary Infections in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3694-3698 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jorgensen, J. H., Crawford, S. A., Kelly, C. C., Patterson, J. E. (2003). In Vitro Activity of Daptomycin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci of Various Van Types and Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3760-3763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Brown, W. J., Rybak, M. J. (2003). Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3960-3963 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alder, J., Li, T., Yu, D., Morton, L., Silverman, J., Zhang, X.-X., Critchley, I., Thorne, G. (2003). Analysis of Daptomycin Efficacy and Breakpoint Standards in a Murine Model of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Renal Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3561-3566 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C. (2003). Postantibiotic Effects of Daptomycin against 14 Staphylococcal and Pneumococcal Clinical Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3012-3014 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bemer, P., Juvin, M.-E., Bryskier, A., Drugeon, H. (2003). In Vitro Activities of a New Lipopeptide, HMR 1043, against Susceptible and Resistant Gram-Positive Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3025-3029 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dandekar, P. K., Tessier, P. R., Williams, P., Nightingale, C. H., Nicolau, D. P. (2003). Pharmacodynamic profile of daptomycin against Enterococcus species and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 405-411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Silverman, J. A., Perlmutter, N. G., Shapiro, H. M. (2003). Correlation of Daptomycin Bactericidal Activity and Membrane Depolarization in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2538-2544 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Laganas, V., Alder, J., Silverman, J. A. (2003). In Vitro Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis Are Not Mediated by Inhibition of Lipoteichoic Acid Biosynthesis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 2682-2684 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cha, R., Grucz, R. G. Jr., Rybak, M. J. (2003). Daptomycin Dose-Effect Relationship against Resistant Gram-Positive Organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1598-1603 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Critchley, I. A., Blosser-Middleton, R. S., Jones, M. E., Thornsberry, C., Sahm, D. F., Karlowsky, J. A. (2003). Baseline Study To Determine In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin against Gram-Positive Pathogens Isolated in the United States in 2000-2001. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1689-1693 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakoulas, G., Eliopoulos, G. M., Alder, J., Eliopoulos, C. T. (2003). Efficacy of Daptomycin in Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcusaureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1714-1718 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dvorchik, B. H., Brazier, D., DeBruin, M. F., Arbeit, R. D. (2003). Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics and Safety following Administration of Escalating Doses Once Daily to Healthy Subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1318-1323 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Critchley, I. A., Draghi, D. C., Sahm, D. F., Thornsberry, C., Jones, M. E., Karlowsky, J. A. (2003). Activity of daptomycin against susceptible and multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens collected in the SECURE study (Europe) during 2000-2001. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 639-649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miyazaki, S., Fujikawa, T., Kobayashi, I., Matsumoto, T., Tateda, K., Yamaguchi, K. (2002). The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial characterization of vancomycin and linezolid against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 971-974 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burkhardt, O., Borner, K., von der Hoh, N., Koppe, P., Pletz, M. W., Nord, C. E., Lode, H. (2002). Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of linezolid and co-amoxiclav in healthy human volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 707-712 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rana, B., Butcher, I., Grigoris, P., Murnaghan, C., Seaton, R. A., Tobin, C. M. (2002). Linezolid penetration into osteo-articular tissues. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 747-750 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wootton, M., Howe, R. A., Walsh, T. R., Bennett, P. M., MacGowan, A. P. (2002). In vitro activity of 21 antimicrobials against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) and heteroVRSA (hVRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 760-761 [Full Text]  
  • Petersen, P. J., Bradford, P. A., Weiss, W. J., Murphy, T. M., Sum, P. E., Projan, S. J. (2002). In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Tigecycline (GAR-936), Daptomycin, and Comparative Antimicrobial Agents against Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and Other Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2595-2601 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Srinivasan, A., Dick, J. D., Perl, T. M. (2002). Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15: 430-438 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karlowsky, J. A., Kelly, L. J., Critchley, I. A., Jones, M. E., Thornsberry, C., Sahm, D. F. (2002). Determining Linezolid's Baseline In Vitro Activity in Canada Using Gram-Positive Clinical Isolates Collected prior to Its National Release. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1989-1992 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Conte, J. E. Jr., Golden, J. A., Kipps, J., Zurlinden, E. (2002). Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 1475-1480 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gander, S., Hayward, K., Finch, R. (2002). An investigation of the antimicrobial effects of linezolid on bacterial biofilms utilizing an in vitro pharmacokinetic model. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 301-308 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wise, R., Gee, T., Andrews, J. M., Dvorchik, B., Marshall, G. (2002). Pharmacokinetics and Inflammatory Fluid Penetration of Intravenous Daptomycin in Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 31-33 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fung-Tomc, J., Valera, L., Minassian, B., Bonner, D., Gradelski, E. (2001). Activity of the novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone BMS-284756 against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 735-738 [Full Text]  
  • King, A., Phillips, I. (2001). The in vitro activity of daptomycin against 514 Gram-positive aerobic clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 219-223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Silverman, J. A., Oliver, N., Andrew, T., Li, T. (2001). Resistance Studies with Daptomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 1799-1802 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Snydman, D. R., Jacobus, N. V., McDermott, L. A., Lonks, J. R., Boyce, J. M. (2000). Comparative In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin and Vancomycin against Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 3447-3450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tally, F. P., DeBruin, M. F. (2000). Development of daptomycin for Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 523-526 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grucz, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rybak, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Grucz, R. G.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»