Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2000, p. 938-942, Vol. 44, No. 4
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vivo Characterization of the Pharmacodynamics of
Flucytosine in a Neutropenic Murine Disseminated Candidiasis
Model
D.
Andes1,* and
M.
van
Ogtrop2
Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious
Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison,
Wisconsin,1 and Leiden University
Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands2
Received 9 November 1998/Returned for modification 10 October
1999/Accepted 10 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
In vivo pharmacodynamic parameters have been characterized for a
variety of antibacterial agents. These parameters have been studied in
correlation with in vivo outcomes in order to determine (i) which
dosing parameter is predictive of outcome and (ii) the magnitude of
that parameter associated with efficacy. Very little is known of the
pharmacodynamics of antifungal agents. We used a neutropenic murine
model of disseminated candidiasis to correlate the pharmacodynamic
parameters (percentage of time above the MIC, area under the
concentration-time curve [AUC]/MIC and peak level/MIC) for
flucytosine (5-FC) in vivo with efficacy as measured by organism number
in homogenized kidney cultures after 24 h of therapy. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FC in infected mice were linear. Serum half-lives ranged from 0.36 to 0.43 h. Infection was achieved by intravenous inoculation of 106 CFU of yeast cells per ml via the
lateral tail vein of neutropenic mice. Groups of mice were treated with
fourfold escalating total doses of 5-FC ranging from 1.56 to 400 mg/kg
of body weight/day divided into one, two, four, or eight doses over
24 h. Increasing doses produced minimal concentration-dependent
killing ranging from 0 to 0.9 log10 CFU/kidneys. 5-FC did,
however, produce a dose-dependent suppression of growth after levels in
serum had fallen below the MIC. The fungistatic dose increased from 6 to 8 mg/kg with dosing every 3 and 6 h to 70 mg/kg at with dosing every 24 h. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best correlated with efficacy. Time
above the MIC was the parameter best predictive of outcome, while
AUC/MIC was only slightly less predictive (time above MIC, R2 = 85%; AUC/MIC,
R2 = 77%; peak level/MIC,
R2 = 53%). Maximal efficacy was observed
when levels exceeded the MIC for only 20 to 25% of the dosing
interval. If one considers drug kinetics in humans, these results
suggest reevaluation of current dosing regimens.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The incidence of nosocomial candida
infections has risen sharply, and candida is now the fourth most common
cause of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (4). The
currently available therapies result in unacceptably high failure rates
(10, 30). In addition, the available antifungal therapies
often produce significant toxicities (14, 18). Although the
new antifungal agents appear to be promising, approaches that optimize
the efficacies and limit the toxicities of currently available agents
through rational pharmacodynamic dosing may offer more immediate impact
(15).
Flucytosine is an oral administered pyrimidine analog that has been
available for clinical use for more than 30 years. Studies with both
experimental infection models and clinical trials have demonstrated the
potency of flucytosine against a variety of yeasts (3, 5, 16,
25). While flucytosine is primarily used for the treatment of
cryptococcal meningitis, several studies have shown its utility in the
therapy of various infections caused by Candida, including
meningitis, endophthalmitis, endocarditis, peritonitis, and candidemia
associated with neutropenia (5, 14, 24). In a recent
consensus publication on the therapy of candidemia, 50% of the
participants would include flucytosine in combination with amphotericin
B for the treatment of candidemia in those with concomitant neutropenia
(13). Current use of this agent has, however, become quite
limited. Clinicians have grown reluctant to use flucytosine because of
(i) the common development of resistance during therapy when it is used
as a single agent and (ii) the relatively narrow therapeutic window.
Pharmacodynamic characterization of flucytosine should enable the
maximization of dosing efficacy and perhaps limit toxicity and the
development of resistance. In the experiments described here we have
characterized the pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of efficacy of
flucytosine monotherapy in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated
Candida albicans infection.
(Part of this work was presented at the 98th General Meeting of the
American Society for Microbiology, Atlanta, Ga., 17 to 21 May 1998, and
the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy, San Diego, Calif., 24 to 27 September 1998.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Organism.
A clinical isolate of C. albicans
designated K-1 was used for all experiments. The organism was recovered
from a patient with endophthalmitis. The organism was maintained,
grown, subcultured, and quantified on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA;
Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.). The organisms were maintained on
SDA slants at 4°C. Twenty-four hours prior to study, the organisms
were subcultured at 35°C.
Antifungal agent.
Flucytosine was obtained as a powder from
Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.). The powder was stored at
70°C. Drug
solutions were prepared on the day of study by dissolving the powder in
sterile distilled H2O.
In vitro susceptibility testing.
The MIC for the organism
was determined by a broth microdilution modification of the M27-A
method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
(21). Determinations were performed in duplicate on at least
two separate occasions (21). Final results are expressed as
the geometric mean of those results.
Animals.
Six-week-old specific-pathogen free female
ICR/Swiss mice (weight, 23 to 27 g; (Harlan Sprague-Dawley,
Madison, Wis.) were used for all studies.
Infection model.
Mice were rendered neutropenic
(polymorphonuclear leukocyte count, <100/mm3) by injecting
cyclophosphamide (Mead Johnson Pharmaceuticals, Evansville, Ind.)
intraperitoneally 4 days (150 mg/kg of body weight) and 1 day (100 mg/kg) before infection.
Organisms were subcultured on SDA 24 h prior to infection. The
inoculum was prepared by placing six colonies into 5 ml of sterile
pyrogen-free 0.9% saline that had been warmed at 35°C. The fungal
counts of the inoculum as determined from viable counts on SDA were
106 CFU/ml.
Disseminated infection with
C. albicans organisms was
achieved by injection of 0.1 ml of inoculum via the lateral tail vein
2 h prior to the start of drug therapy. At the end of the study
period the animals were killed by CO
2 asphyxiation. After
the
mice were killed, the kidneys of each mouse were immediately
removed
and placed in sterile 0.9% saline at 4°C. The homogenate was
then
serially diluted 1:10 and aliquots were plated onto SDA for
determination
of viable fungal colony counts after incubation for
24 h at 35°C.
Results were expressed as the mean number of CFU
per kidneys for
two mice (four
kidneys).
Pharmacokinetics.
The single-dose pharmacokinetics of
flucytosine were determined for individual neutropenic, infected
ICR/Swiss mice following the administration of subcutaneous doses of
6.25, 25, and 100 mg/kg in 0.2-ml volumes. For each dose examined,
groups of three mice were sampled three or four times by retro-orbital
puncture, and the samples were collected in heparinized capillary tubes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) at 30- to 60-min intervals. The
tubes were centrifuged (model MB centrifuge; International Equipment
Co.) at 10,000 × g for 5 min. The serum was
subsequently removed and drug levels were determined by a standard drug
diffusion bioassay with Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the
assay organism in Noble agar and yeast nitrogen base (23).
Assays of serum samples and preparation of standard curves prepared
with mouse serum were performed on the same day. Intraday variation
ranged from 0 to 2.7 mg/liter. The lower level of detection for this
assay was 2 mg/liter. Pharmacokinetic constants including elimination
half-life and concentration at time zero were calculated by using a
one-compartment model with first-order absorption via nonlinear
least-squares techniques (MINSQ; Micromath Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah).
The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated by the
trapezoidal rule. For doses for which no kinetics were determined, pharmacokinetic parameter values were extrapolated from the values obtained in the actual studies. Total levels in serum were used for all
calculations because of the negligible amount of protein binding to flucytosine.
In vivo PAE.
Infection in neutropenic mice was produced as
described above. Two hours after infection with C. albicans
K-1, the mice were treated with single subcutaneous doses of
flucytosine (6.25, 25, and 100 mg/kg). Groups of two treated mice and
two control mice were killed at each sampling time interval ranging
from 1 to 12 h. Control growth was determined over 24 h at
five sampling times. The treated groups were sampled nine times over
30 h. The kidneys were removed at each time point and were
immediately processed for CFU determination as outlined above. The time
that serum flucytosine levels remained above the MIC for the organism
following administration of the three doses was calculated from the
pharmacokinetic data. The postantibiotic effect (PAE) was calculated by
determining the amount of time that it took for the organism numbers in
the controls to increase 1 log10 CFU/kidneys (C)
and subtracting this from the amount of time that it took organisms
from the treated animals to grow 1 log10 CFU/kidneys
(T) after levels in serum fell below the MIC for the
organism, i.e., PAE = T
C (7, 28).
Pharmacodynamic parameter determination.
Neutropenic mice
were infected with C. albicans K-1 2 h prior to the
start of therapy. Twenty dosing regimens were chosen to minimize the
interdependence between the three pharmacodynamic parameters studied
and also to describe the complete dose-response relationship. Groups of
two mice each were treated for 24 h with different flucytosine
dosing regimens by using fourfold increasing total doses administered
at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h intervals. Total doses ranged from 1.56 to 400 mg/kg/day. Drug was administered in 0.2-ml volumes. The mice were
killed after 24 h of therapy, and the kidneys were removed for CFU
determination as described above. Untreated control mice were killed
just before treatment and after 24 h. Efficacy was defined as the
change in log10 the number of CFU per kidneys over the 24-h
treatment period and was calculated by subtracting the mean
log10 number of CFU per kidneys in untreated control mice
after 24 h from the mean number of CFU in the kidneys of two mice
at the end of therapy.
Data analysis.
A sigmoid dose-effect model was used to
measure the in vivo potency of flucytosine. The model is derived from
the Hill equation: E = (Emax × DN)/(ED50N + DN), where E is the observed effect
(change in log10 number of CFU per kidney compared with
that in untreated controls at 24 h), D is the
cumulative 24-h dose, Emax is the maximum
effect, ED50 is the dose required to achieve 50% of
Emax, and N is the slope of the
dose-effect relationship. The correlation between efficacy and each of
the three parameters studied was determined by nonlinear least-squares
multivariate regression analysis (Sigma Stat; Jandel Scientific
Software, San Rafael, Calif.). The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to estimate the percent variance
in the change in the log10 number of CFU per kidneys over
the treatment period for the different dosing regimens that could be
attributed to each of the pharmacodynamic parameters.
To allow a more meaningful comparison of potency among the dosing
regimens studied, we calculated the dose required to produce
a
fungistatic effect or no net growth over 24 h. The static dose
was
estimated from the following equation: log
10 static
dose =
{log
10
[
E/(
Emax
E)]}/
N + log
10
ED
50. If the static doses for
the different dosing
intervals were similar, this would suggest
that AUC/MIC is the
parameter most important in the prediction
of outcome. If the static
dose increased significantly as the
dosing interval was lengthened from
every 3 h through every 24
h, the duration of time that the
levels in serum remained above
the MIC was the parameter predictive of
efficacy.
 |
RESULTS |
In vitro susceptibility testing.
The MIC for flucytosine for
C. albicans K-1 was 1.0 mg/liter.
Pharmacokinetics.
The time course of the levels of flucytosine
in the sera of infected neutropenic mice following the administration
of subcutaneous doses of 6.25, 25, and 100 mg/kg are shown in Fig.
1. The pharmacokinetics were linear and
were well described by a one-compartment model. Peak levels were
achieved within 30 min for each of the doses and ranged from 5.2 ± 0.6 to 97 ± 2.5 mg/liter. The elimination half-life did not
change significantly with higher doses and ranged from 0.36 to
0.43 h. The AUC, as determined by the trapezoidal rule, ranged
from 3.2 to 60 mg · h/liter with the lowest and highest doses,
respectively.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Serum flucytosine concentrations after the
administration of subcutaneous doses of 100, 25, and 6.25 mg/kg in
neutropenic infected mice. Each symbol represents the geometric
mean ± standard deviation levels in serum for three mice.
|
|
In vivo PAE.
Following inoculation of 106 CFU/ml
into the tail vein, the growth of candida organisms in the kidneys of
untreated mice increased 2.4 ± 0.12 log10 CFU/kidneys
over 24 h. Growth of 1 log10 CFU/kidneys in untreated
control mice was achieved in 14.3 h. On the basis of the
pharmacokinetics described above, the three doses of flucytosine studied (6.25, 25, and 100 mg/kg) would produce levels in serum above
the MIC for the candida organism (1.0 mg/l) for 1.5, 2.4, and 3.3 h, respectively. Treatment with each of the doses produced modest
reductions in colony counts compared with the numbers at the start of
therapy, ranging from 0.44 ± 0.13 log10 CFU/kidneys at the lowest dose to 0.64 ± 0.08 log10 CFU/thigh at
the highest dose. Growth curves for both the control group and treated
mice after the administration of single doses of flucytosine are shown in Fig. 2. At each of the three doses
studied, flucytosine suppressed regrowth of the organisms in a
dose-dependent fashion. PAEs increased from 3.3 to 15.1 h with
escalating flucytosine doses. These in vivo studies are unable to
determine what degree of growth suppression could be due to the
antimicrobial effects of sub-MICs. In addition, although serum drug
concentrations have been shown to be a relatively good surrogate of the
concentrations in tissue, the magnitude of the PAE in these experiments
may have been different if we were able to accurately measure the
flucytosine concentrations at the site of infection.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
In vivo PAE of flucytosine against C. albicans in neutropenic mice after administration of doses of 100, 25, and 6.25 mg/kg. Each symbol represents the mean ± standard
deviation for two mice (four kidneys).
|
|
Pharmacodynamic parameter determination.
At the start of
therapy the kidneys had 4.14 ± 0.09 log10
CFU/kidneys. After 24 h the organisms grew by 2.58 ± 0.01 log10 CFU/kidneys in untreated mice and resulted in the
death of each of the control mice. Escalating doses of flucytosine
produced little net killing of organisms in treated animals compared to the inoculum in control animals at the start of therapy. The highest total doses for the different regimens resulted in a reduction of
0.40 ± 0.06 log10 CFU/kidneys with dosing every
24 h and a reduction of 0.73 ± 0.09 log10
CFU/kidneys with the shortest dosing interval.
As shown in Fig.
3, there was a
significant increase in the dose required to produce a net static
effect over the 24-h treatment
period as the dosing interval was
lengthened. The fungistatic
dose ranged from 6 to 8 mg/kg/day for the
3- and 6-h dosing regimens
but increased to 70 mg/kg/day with the 24-h
dosing regimen.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Relationship between the 24-h total dose for four
lengthening dosing intervals and log10 number of CFU per
kidneys in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated candidiasis.
Symbols above the reference line represent growth, while those below
the reference line represent net killing compared to control growth at
the beginning of therapy. Each symbol represents data for two mice
(four kidneys).
|
|
The relationship between microbiologic effect and each of the
pharmacodynamic parameters, percent time above the MIC, AUC/MIC,
and
peak level/MIC, are shown in Fig.
4a to
c. Minimal in vivo
killing made it difficult to correlate parameters
with efficacy.
Both the time that the levels in serum remained above
the MIC
for the organism and the AUC/MIC appeared to be important in
predicting
efficacy; however, time above the MIC had a relatively
stronger
regression coefficient (
R2 = 85%
[
P < 0.001] versus 77% [
P < 0.001]). The peak level/MIC
was the least important pharmacodynamic
parameter in determining
efficacy (
R2 = 53% [
P = 0.002]). Maximal efficacy was observed when
levels
in serum exceeded the MIC for this organism for only 20 to 25%
of the 24-h dosing interval.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
(a) Relationship between the percentage of the dosing
interval that levels in serum remained above the MIC for the organism
and log10 number of CFU per kidneys after 24 h of
therapy. Each symbol represents data for two mice (four kidneys). (b)
Relationship between the 24-h AUC/MIC and log10 number of
CFU per kidneys after 24 h of therapy. Each symbol represents data
for two mice (four kidneys). (c) Relationship between the peak level in
serum/MIC and log10 number of CFU per kidneys after 24 h of therapy. Each symbol represents data for two mice (four
kidneys).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The time course of antimicrobial activity can be determined by two
characteristics: (i) the effect of increasing drug concentrations on
the extent of organism killing and (ii) the presence or absence of
antimicrobial effects which persist after the levels in serum have
fallen below the MIC (9). For example, demonstration of the
concentration-dependent killing and prolonged PAE with the aminoglycoside class has provided the basis for once-daily dosing of
these drugs (8). This regimen optimizes the
concentration-dependent parameters peak level/MIC and AUC/MIC, which
have been shown to predict efficacy, limit toxicity, and reduce the
development of organism resistance (6, 19, 29).
Previous animal infection models have demonstrated the potency of
flucytosine both alone and in combination with other agents against
several Candida species (3, 16, 22, 26). In
addition, several studies have demonstrated the concordance between in
vitro susceptibility and in vivo endpoints (1, 25). These
studies have, however, used only a single dosing interval, limiting
one's ability to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best
predicts efficacy. With only a single dosing interval, escalating doses increase the levels of all three parameters. The interdependence between the parameters with single-dosing-interval studies is too great
to determine if one is more important than another. We were able to
locate only a single study, by Karytotakis and Anaissie
(17), in which more than one dosing length was used. Continuous infusion of flucytosine via a subcutaneous pump was compared
to once-daily administration in the therapy of disseminated Candida lusitaniae infection in an immunocompromised mouse
model. They found significantly greater reductions in yeast numbers in the kidneys of mice treated by continuous infusion. These results were
thought to be due simply to the short elimination half-life of
flucytosine in this animal model. Several pharmacodynamic studies, however, have shown that these parameters can be independent of differences in animal and human pharmacokinetics. For example, the
durations of time that the levels in serum need to exceed the MIC for
efficacy are similar in animal infection models and for bacteriologic
cure in acute otitis media (10; W. A. Craig, S. Ebert, and Y. Watanabe, Program Abstr. 33rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother., abstr. 86, p. 135, 1993).
The current studies demonstrated that time above the MIC is the
pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameter that most strongly correlated with the outcome of flucytosine monotherapy. We also showed
that less total drug needed to be given to achieve a similar effect
when the drug was administered more frequently, maximizing this
time-dependent parameter. Tenfold more drug was required to produce a
net static effect when drug was administered once daily than when it
was administered four to eight times daily. Thus, these data suggest
that low-dose, frequently administered regimens of flucytosine can be
as effective as higher-dose regimens of flucytosine, provided that the
concentrations in serum are maintained above the MIC for greater than
25% of the dosing interval. However, we demonstrated that efficacy is
dependent upon the time that serum flucytosine levels remain above the
MIC for the C. albicans organism, not simply upon the
frequency of the dosing interval. Similar outcomes were observed with
the various flucytosine dosing intervals when the doses used produced
similar times above the MIC.
Flucytosine would only rarely be used as monotherapy in humans, such as
for urinary tract infections (27). However, studies of
flucytosine in combination with several classes of antibiotics have
shown that the pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of efficacy in
combination therapy is the same as that observed with monotherapy (12, 20). Thus, we expect that in combination with either amphotericin B or fluconazole, dosing of flucytosine to maximize the
time that levels in serum remain above the MIC would still be most efficacious.
Although the experiments described here included only a single strain
of C. albicans, we observed near maximal microbiologic efficacy when levels in serum remained above the MIC for only a quarter
of the dosing interval. We believe that this relatively brief time
requirement is most likely due to the significant PAEs observed. If one
were to consider the human kinetics of the most frequently recommended
flucytosine dosing of 150 mg/kg/day divided into four doses, each dose
of 37.5 mg/kg would remain above the MIC for 90% of C. albicans isolates tested for 12 to 14 h (11). Many
experts have suggested the use of significantly lower doses of
flucytosine (100 mg/kg/day) (13, 14). If the findings of these studies are confirmed in strains with a wide variety of susceptibilities, a reevaluation of current flucytosine dosing regimens
would be suggested. Use of significantly smaller amounts of drug or
dosing to achieve lower peak levels may allow flucytosine administration with much less concern about related toxicities. Several
studies have shown that bone marrow toxicities are essentially eliminated when levels in serum remain between 40 and 60 mg/liter (14, 18). Even these "safe" levels would not be
necessary if the pharmacodynamic predictions provided here are valid.
Future studies should characterize the time above the MIC necessary for flucytosine to have efficacy against other yeast species as well as the
time above the MIC for flucytosine in combination with other antifungal
agents. In addition, studies should attempt to correlate these
parameters with the development of toxicity and resistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin
School of Medicine, Room H4/570, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792. Phone: (608) 263-1545. Fax: (608) 263-4464. E-mail:
drandes{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anaissie, E. J.,
N. C. Karyotakis,
R. Hachem,
M. C. Dignani,
J. H. Rex, and V. Paetznick.
1994.
Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antifungal agents against Candida species.
J. Infect. Dis.
170:384-389[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Andes, D., and M. van Ogtrop.
1999.
Characterization and quantitation of the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis infection model.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:2116-2120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Atkinson, B. A.,
C. Bouthet,
R. Bocanegra,
A. Correa,
M. F. Luther, and J. R. Graybill.
1995.
Comparison of fluconazole, amphotericin B and flucytosine in treatment of a murine model of disseminated infection with Candida glabrata in immunocompromised mice.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
35:631-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Banerjee, S. N.,
T. G. Emori,
D. H. Culver,
R. P. Gaynes,
W. R. Jarvis,
T. Horan,
J. R. Edwards,
J. S. Tolson,
T. Henderson, and W. J. Martone.
1991.
Secular trends in nosocomial primary blood stream infections in the United States, 1980-1989.
Am. J. Med.
91(Suppl. 3B):86-89.
|
| 5.
|
Bennett, J. E.,
W. E. Dismukes,
R. J. Duma,
G. Medoff,
M. A. Sande,
H. Gallis,
J. Leonard,
B. T. Fields,
M. Bradshaw,
H. Haywood,
Z. A. McGee,
T. R. Cate,
C. G. Cobs,
J. F. Warner, and D. W. Alling.
1979.
A comparison of amphotericin B alone and combined with flucytosine in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis.
N. Engl. J. Med.
301:126-131[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Blaser, J.,
B. B. Stone,
M. C. Groner, and S. H. Zinner.
1987.
Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin, a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
31:1054-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Craig, W. A., and S. Gudmundsson.
1996.
Postantibiotic effect, p. 296-329.
In
V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 4th ed. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md.
|
| 8.
|
Craig, W. A.,
J. Redington, and S. C. Ebert.
1991.
Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
27(Suppl. C):29-40[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Craig, W. A.
1998.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
26:1-12[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Craig, W. A., and D. Andes.
1996.
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in otitis media.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
15:955-962[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Cutler, R. E.,
A. D. Blair, and M. R. Kelly.
1978.
Flucytosine kinetics in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
24:333-342[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
den Hollander, J. G.,
J. W. Mouton, and H. A. Verbrugh.
1998.
Use of pharmacodynamic parameters to predict efficacy of combination therapy by using fractional inhibitory concentration kinetics.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:744-748[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Edwards, J. E., and Conference Participants.
1997.
International Conference for the Development of a Consensus on the Management and Prevention of Severe Candida Infections.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
25:43-59[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Francis, P., and T. J. Walsh.
1992.
Evolving role of flucytosine in immunocompromised patients: new insights into safety, pharmacokinetics, and antifungal therapy.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
15:1003-1018[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Georgeopapadakou, N. H., and T. J. Walsh.
1996.
Antifungal agents: chemotherapeutic targets and immunologic strategies.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:279-291[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Graybill, J. R.,
L. K. Najvar,
J. D. Holmberg, and M. F. Luther.
1995.
Fluconazole, D0870, and flucytosine treatment of disseminated Candida tropicalis infections in mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:924-929[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Karytotakis, N. C., and E. J. Anaissie.
1996.
Efficacy of continuous flucytosine infusion against Candida lusitaniae in experimental hematogenous murine candidiasis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:2907-2908[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Kauffman, C. A., and P. T. Frame.
1977.
Bone marrow toxicity associated with 5-fluorocytosine therapy.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
11:244-247[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Moore, R. D.,
P. S. Lietman, and C. R. Smith.
1987.
Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration.
J. Infect. Dis.
155:93-99[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Mouton, J. W.,
M. L. van Ogtrop,
D. Andes, and W. A. Craig.
1999.
Use of pharmacodynamic indices to predict efficacy of combination therapy in vivo.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
43:2473-2478[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1997.
Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing for yeast; approved standard. M27-A.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 22.
|
Polak, A.
1989.
Combination therapy for systemic mycosis.
Infection
17:203-208[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Shadomy, S.,
A. Espinel-Ingroff, and Y. Cartwright.
1985.
Laboratory studies with antifungal agents: susceptibility tests and bioassays, p. 991-999.
In
E. H. Lennette, A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., and H. J. Shadomy (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 24.
|
Smego, R. A.,
J. R. Perfect, and D. T. Durack.
1984.
Combined therapy with amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine for candida meningitis.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
6:791-800[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Stiller, R. L.,
J. E. Bennett,
H. J. Scholer,
M. Wall,
A. Polak, and D. A. Stevens.
1983.
Correlation of in vitro susceptibility test results with in vivo response: flucytosine therapy in a systemic candidiasis model.
J. Infect. Dis.
147:1070-1077[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Thaler, M.,
J. Bacher,
T. O'Leary, and P. A. Pizzo.
1988.
Evaluation of single-drug and combination antifungal therapy in an experimental model of candidiasis in rabbits with prolonged neutropenia.
J. Infect. Dis.
158:80-88[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Viviani, M. A.
1995.
Flucytosine what is its future?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
35:241-244[Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Vogelman, B.,
S. Gudmundsson,
J. Turnidge,
J. Leggett, and W. A. Craig.
1988.
In vivo postantibiotic effect in a thigh infection in neutropenic mice.
J. Infect. Dis.
157:287-298[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Vogelman, B.,
S. Gudmundsson,
J. Leggett,
J. Turnidge,
S. Ebert, and W. A. Craig.
1988.
Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model.
J. Infect. Dis.
158:831-847[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Wey, S. B.,
M. Mori,
M. A. Pfaller,
R. F. Woolson, and R. P. Wenzel.
1988.
Hospital acquired candidemia: the attributable mortality and excess length of stay.
Arch. Intern. Med.
148:2642-2645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2000, p. 938-942, Vol. 44, No. 4
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Andes, D., Pascual, A., Marchetti, O.
(2009). Antifungal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Established and Emerging Indications. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 24-34
[Full Text]
-
Andes, D. R., Diekema, D. J., Pfaller, M. A., Marchillo, K., Bohrmueller, J.
(2008). In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Target Investigation for Micafungin against Candida albicans and C. glabrata in a Neutropenic Murine Candidiasis Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3497-3503
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pai, M. P., Samples, M. L., Mercier, R.-C., Spilde, M. N.
(2008). Activities and Ultrastructural Effects of Antifungal Combinations against Simulated Candida Endocardial Vegetations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 2367-2376
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Andes, D., Diekema, D. J., Pfaller, M. A., Prince, R. A., Marchillo, K., Ashbeck, J., Hou, J.
(2008). In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Characterization of Anidulafungin in a Neutropenic Murine Candidiasis Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 539-550
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Goodwin, M. L., Drew, R. H.
(2008). Antifungal serum concentration monitoring: an update. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 17-25
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hope, W. W., Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Reed, P., Keevil, B., Louie, A., Walsh, T. J., Denning, D. W., Drusano, G. L.
(2007). Optimization of the Dosage of Flucytosine in Combination with Amphotericin B for Disseminated Candidiasis: a Pharmacodynamic Rationale for Reduced Dosing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 3760-3762
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brouwer, A. E., van Kan, H. J. M., Johnson, E., Rajanuwong, A., Teparrukkul, P., Wuthiekanun, V., Chierakul, W., Day, N., Harrison, T. S.
(2007). Oral versus Intravenous Flucytosine in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 1038-1042
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hope, W. W., Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Howard, S., Kasai, M., Louie, A., Walsh, T. J., Drusano, G. L., Denning, D. W.
(2006). Derivation of an In Vivo Drug Exposure Breakpoint for Flucytosine against Candida albicans and Impact of the MIC, Growth Rate, and Resistance Genotype on the Antifungal Effect. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3680-3688
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schwarz, P., Dromer, F., Lortholary, O., Dannaoui, E.
(2006). Efficacy of Amphotericin B in Combination with Flucytosine against Flucytosine-Susceptible or Flucytosine-Resistant Isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans during Disseminated Murine Cryptococcosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 113-120
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
te Dorsthorst, D. T. A., Verweij, P. E., Meis, J. F. G. M., Mouton, J. W.
(2005). Efficacy and Pharmacodynamics of Flucytosine Monotherapy in a Nonneutropenic Murine Model of Invasive Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 4220-4226
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Andes, D.
(2003). In Vivo Pharmacodynamics of Antifungal Drugs in Treatment of Candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 1179-1186
[Full Text]
-
Andes, D., Marchillo, K., Lowther, J., Bryskier, A., Stamstad, T., Conklin, R.
(2003). In Vivo Pharmacodynamics of HMR 3270, a Glucan Synthase Inhibitor, in a Murine Candidiasis Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 1187-1192
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Huynh, H., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J.
(2002). In Vitro Activities of 5-Fluorocytosine against 8,803 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp.: Global Assessment of Primary Resistance Using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Susceptibility Testing Methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 3518-3521
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Walsh, T. J., Chaturvedi, V., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Gosey, L. L., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Sheehan, D. J., Warnock, D. W.
(2001). Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Practical Aspects and Current Challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
14: 643-658
[Abstract]
[Full Text]