Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1132-1139, Vol. 44, No. 5
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Bacteriophage Lambda-Based Genetic Screen for
Characterization of the Activity and Phenotype of the Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease
Miguel-Angel
Martínez,*
Marta
Cabana,
Mariona
Parera,
Arantxa
Gutierrez,
José A.
Esté, and
Bonaventura
Clotet
Fundació irsiCaixa, Hospital
Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain
Received 22 September 1999/Returned for modification 14 December
1999/Accepted 18 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) resistance to
antiretroviral drugs is the main cause of patient treatment failure. Despite the problems associated with interpretation of HIV-1 resistance testing, resistance monitoring should help in the rational design of
initial or rescue antiretroviral therapies. It has previously been
shown that the activity of the HIV-1 protease can be monitored by using
a bacteriophage lambda-based genetic assay. This genetic screening
system is based on the bacteriophage lambda regulatory circuit in which
the viral repressor cI is specifically cleaved to initiate
the lysogenic to lytic switch. We have adapted this simple lambda-based
genetic assay for the analysis of the activities and phenotypes of
different HIV-1 proteases. Lambda phages that encode HIV-1 proteases
either from laboratory strains (strain HXB2) or from clinical samples
are inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the HIV-1 protease
inhibitors indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and nelfinavir. Distinct
susceptibilities to different drugs were also detected among phages
that encode HIV-1 proteases carrying different resistance mutations,
further demonstrating the specificity of this assay. Differences in
proteolytic processing activity can also be directly monitored with
this genetic screen system since two phage populations compete in
culture with each other until one phage outgrows the other. In summary,
we present here a simple, safe, and rapid genetic screening system that
may be used to predict the activities and phenotypes of HIV-1 proteases in the course of viral infection and antiretroviral therapy. This assay
responds appropriately to well-known HIV-1 protease inhibitors and can
be used to search for new protease inhibitors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
type 1 (HIV-1) protease is essential in the replication and maturation
of the virus because it processes gag (p55) and
gag-pol (p160) polyprotein products into functional core and
viral enzymes (4). Several inhibitors of the HIV-1 protease
have become available for the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients
(14). Early antiviral therapy, mainly directed against the
reverse transcriptase, showed limited antiviral activity. However,
treatment with antiretroviral combination therapy that includes at
least a protease inhibitor has made possible the reduction of plasma
virus levels to below the limit of detection (9, 11, 14).
Nevertheless, suboptimal therapies that fail to achieve a complete and
sustained suppression of virus replication lead to the selection of
drug-resistant virus mutants (5, 21, 29). Moreover, there is
an overlap of resistance-conferring mutations among most of the
available protease inhibitors (1). A latent reservoir of
replication-competent virus remains in CD4 T cells (3, 7,
30), and the persistence of HIV-1 replication has also been
detected in some patients with sustained suppression of viremia
(8, 15, 17, 32), suggesting that drug-resistant viruses are
expected to emerge even in patients with undetectable virus in
their plasma. Faster and simpler assays for the phenotypic detection of drug resistance and cross-resistance may facilitate the
study of the increasing number of patients bearing HIV-1 strains resistant to protease inhibitors. New drug-screening systems might also
be important in the search for new anti-HIV-1 drugs.
It has previously been demonstrated that a bacteriophage lambda-based
genetic screen can be used to monitor the activity of the HIV-1
protease (28). This genetic screening system is based on the
bacteriophage lambda cI-cro regulatory circuit in
which the viral repressor cI is specifically cleaved to
initiate the lysogenic to lytic switch (26). An endogenous
bacterial protease, RecA, cleaves the lambda repressor cI at
a specific protein region, avoiding an efficient DNA-cI
complex and switching on the viral lytic genes that will produce the
phage progeny. When a recombinant cI repressor containing a
specific HIV-1 protease cleavage site was tested in vivo it was found
to be resistant to RecA cleavage. Interestingly, the introduction of an
HIV-1 protease in a wild-type phage will cleave this mutant
cI repressor containing a specific HIV-1 protease cleavage
site, allowing the phage to go into the lytic replication cycle (Fig.
1) (28).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Bacteriophage lambda-based genetic screen for
characterization of the activity and phenotype of HIV-1 protease. This
genetic screening system is based on the bacteriophage lambda
cI-cro regulatory circuit in which the viral
repressor cI is specifically cleaved to initiate the
lysogenic to lytic switch. When phages that contain a specific HIV-1
protease ( -HIV-1p) infect E. coli cells that express the
recombinant cI.HIV-1 repressor, the infection results in
lytic replication. Phages that lack HIV-1 proteases are not able to
replicate in cells that express the cI.HIV-1 repressor.
Likewise, phages that contain HIV-1 proteases cannot replicate in cells
that express the wild-type cI repressor. The
cI.HIV-1 repressor contains the matrix-capsid (p17/p24)
gag cleavage site sequence shown here. The structure and
construction of cI.HIV-1 repressors are described by Sices
and Kristie (28). WT, wild type; Gal,
-galactosidase.
|
|
The complexity and time-consuming nature of the current ex
vivo or in vitro protocols for the characterization of HIV-1
protease activity prompted us to explore this bacteriophage
lambda-based genetic screening system as a simple alternative approach
to the characterization of HIV-1 protease enzymatic activity and
phenotype. Here, we demonstrate that lambda phages that encode HIV-1
proteases either from HIV-1 laboratory strains or from clinical samples are inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by four different HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Furthermore, differences in proteolytic
processing activity among mutant enzymes could be also monitored with
this simple genetic screening system.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
HIV-1 proteases.
Viral RNA was isolated from an HIV-1 HXB2
strain stock (obtained through the Medical Research Council AIDS
Reagent Program, London, United Kingdom) cultured in Sup-T1 cells and
from six plasma samples obtained from three HIV-1-infected patients.
These three patients were selected for this study because they had
failed therapy with different antiprotease regimens. Table
1 shows the clinical characteristics and
the antiprotease drug experiences of these patients and for the two
samples analyzed for each patient. RNA was extracted from a volume of
140 µl of plasma or the supernatant of a Sup-T1 cell culture with the
QIAamp blood kit (Qiagen). After viral RNA isolation, 10 µl of
resuspended RNA was reverse transcribed and was amplified with the
Titan one-tube reverse transcription (RT)-PCR System (Boehringer
Mannheim) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the
RT-PCR mixture contained 10 pmol of the protease oligonucleotides
5'prot1 (sense) (5'-AGC TAA TTT TTT AGG GAA GAT CTG GCC TTC C-3'; HXB2
positions 2077 to 2108 [22]) and 3'prot1 (antisense)
(5'-GCA CCT ACT GGA GTA TTG TAT GGA TTT TCA GG'-3; HXB2 positions 2703 to 2733), 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, RT-PCR buffer, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 5 U of RNase
inhibitor, 1 µl of enzyme mix (avian myeloblastosis virus and Expand
High Fidelity PCR System) in a total reaction volume of 50 µl. The
samples were incubated for 30 min at 50°C; then one cycle of
denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; then 10 cycles of denaturation at
94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension
at 68°C for 1 min; and then 25 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for
30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 68°C
for 1 min plus 5 s for each cycle. A final extension at 68°C for
7 min was added to the last cycle. A 5-µl aliquot was again amplified
in a 100-µl reaction mixture containing 10 pmol of the protease
oligonucleotides HIVproL (sense) (5'-GGG GAA
TTC TAA GGC CAG GGA ATT TTC TTC-3'; HXB2 positions 2117 to
2136) and HIVproR (antisense) (5'-GGG GAA TTC
AAA GGC CAT CCA TTC CTG GC-3'; HXB2 positions 2587 to 2603)
(underscores indicate an EcoRI restriction site), 200 µM
deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.5 mM MgCl2, PCR buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.3]), and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer). Cycling parameters were one cycle of denaturation at 94°C for 2 min and then 35 cycles of denaturation at
94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension
at 72°C for 1 min. This was followed by a 7-min incubation at 72°C. By following the above protocol, the sequence amplified included the
full-length HIV-1 protease plus 44 amino acids upstream and 18 amino
acids downstream of the protease-coding region.
Construction of recombinant phages.
The HIV-1 protease PCR
products were digested with EcoRI, ligated to
EcoRI-digested bacteriophage lambda ZapII (Stratagene), and
packaged in vitro. Phage stocks were prepared from the correct insert
orientation. Phage DNA sequencing confirmed that there were no major
differences in the protease amino acid sequences between the
RT-PCR-amplified HIV-1 RNA and the recombinant phages (data not shown).
Lambda-based genetic assay.
Escherichia coli JM109
containing plasmid p2X-cI.HIV was transformed with plasmid
pcI.HIV-cro as described by Sices and Kristie (28). Briefly, 200 µl (108 cells) of the
resulting strain was infected with 107 PFU of phages
containing the different HIV-1 proteases (
-HIV-1p) for 15 min at
37°C, washed with 1 ml of 10 mM MgSO4, and resuspended in
LB medium containing 12.5 µg of tetracycline per ml, 0.2% maltose, 10 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), and the
appropriate drug concentration (see Fig. 4) in a final volume of 1 ml.
At 3 h postinfection at 37°C, aliquots of the cultures were
coplated with E. coli XL-1 Blue cells in top agar containing
12.5 µg of tetracycline per ml, 0.2% maltose, 0.1 mM IPTG, and the
indicated drug concentration for 6 h (see Fig. 4). The competitive
replication assay between phages carrying different HIV-1 proteases was
carried out by coinfecting 108
pcI.HIV-cro cells with 107 PFU of
-HIV-1pJAD93 and 107 PFU of
-HIV-1pJAD98. After one
cycle of selection, additional cycles of selective growth were done by
resuspending 1/10 (100 µl) of the infected cells with a fresh aliquot
(108 cells) of pcI.HIV-cro cells and
cycling was continued as described above. After three selective cycles
phage DNA from 5 µl of culture supernatant was directly amplified by
PCR with T3 and T7 oligonucleotides. PCR conditions were the same as
those described above for the HIVproL and HIVproR oligonucleotides. PCR
products were purified by using the Qiaquick spin PCR purification kit
(Qiagen). Sequencing reactions were carried out with the ABI PRISM
dRhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and T3
and T7 oligonucleotides. The products of the reactions were then
analyzed on an Applied Biosystems 310 sequencer. Sequence editing was
performed with the Sequence Navigator program (Applied Biosystems). The
Factura DNA analysis software package (Applied Biosystems) was used to quantify the proportion of individual nucleotide mixture ratios during
three cycles of competitive phage selective growth (see Fig. 5). At the
relevant nucleotide positions, for example, protease codon 82, the
peaks heights of the nucleotide bases representing the wild-type and
mutant coding sequences were compared.
Ex vivo drug susceptibility testing.
Peripheral blood
mononuclear cells from patient IRLL isolates 95 and 98 were cocultured
with phytohemagglutinin (Sigma)-interleukin 2 (Boehringer
Inghelheim)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from an
HIV-seronegative blood donor. When the HIV-1 p24 antigen concentration
in the culture surpassed 20 ng/ml, the supernatants were harvested.
Titration of these two virus stocks was performed in MT-4 cells. The
HXB2 control HIV-1 isolate and the MT4-4 cells were obtained from the
AIDS Reagent Project (Medical Research Council). HXB2 virus was
propagated and titrated in MT4-4 cells. Patient and HXB2 isolates were
tested in triplicate with indinavir (IND; Merck & Co, West Point, Pa.),
ritonavir (RIT; Abbott Laboratories, Park Road, Ill.), saquinavir (SQV;
Roche Laboratories, London, United Kingdom), and nelfinavir (NFV;
Agouron Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, Calif.). Anti-HIV-1 activity
measurements in MT-4 cells were based on the viabilities of cells that
had been infected or not infected with HIV-1 (multiplicity of
infection, 0.003) and exposed to various concentrations of the drug.
After the MT-4 cells were allowed to proliferate for 5 days, the number
of viable cells was quantified by a tetrazolium-based colorimetric
method (MTT method) as described elsewhere (24).
 |
RESULTS |
In order to assess if the bacteriophage lambda-based genetic assay
can be used to monitor the activities of HIV-1 proteases either from
laboratory strains or from clinical samples, RT-PCR-amplified DNAs
encompassing the full-length protease-coding sequence from the HXB2
laboratory virus strain and from six plasma samples from three
HIV-1-infected patients were cloned in a lambda phage to generate a
-galactosidase-HIV-1 protease fusion protein (Fig. 1). The amino
acid sequences of the seven HIV-1 proteases analyzed in this study are
shown in Fig. 2. E. coli cells
containing the HIV-1 cI repressor
(cI.HIV-1-cro) construct (Fig. 1) were then infected with phages encoding the seven different
-galactosidase-HIV-1 protease fusion proteins (
-HIV-1p).
Wild-type lambda phage (
) and a phage carrying an inverted HXB2
protease (
-HIV-1pinvHXB2) were used as controls.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Deduced amino acid sequence alignment of the seven HIV-1
proteases analyzed in the present study. Amino acid changes relative to
the clade B consensus sequence (22) are indicated. Dots
indicate amino acid identity. The sampling time points (years) are
indicated for the three patients.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 3, the seven
-HIV-1p
proteases replicated 100 to 1,000 times more efficiently than
-HIV-1pinvHXB2 or a wild-type
phage in cells expressing the
cI.HIV-1-cro construct. This result demonstrates
that the activities of HIV-1 proteases from different sources can be
monitored by using this simple bacteriophage lambda-based genetic
assay. Furthermore, the low deviations observed after four independent
activity determinations for each sample (Fig. 3) showed the high degree
of reproducibility of this system. No significant differences in
replicative capacities were observed among the four phages
carrying wild-type proteases (
-HIV-1pHXB2, -IRLL95,
-JAD93, and -JGR95) (Fig. 3). Interestingly, those phages containing
proteases with genotypic resistance to anti-HIV-1 protease drugs
(
-HIV-1pIRLL98, -JAD98, and -JGR97) (Fig. 2) replicated up to nine
times less efficiently than naive
-HIV-1p (Fig. 3).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Selective growth of -HIV-1 proteases in cells
expressing the cI.HIV-1-cro construct. Cells
expressing the cI.HIV-1-cro construct were
infected with different -HIV-1 proteases or control
-HIV-1pinvHXB2 and phages. As shown, selection in
cI.HIV-1-cro cells resulted in the replication of
-HIV-1 proteases, whereas the replication of -HIV-1pinvHXB2 or
phages was severely compromised. Each datum point is the average of
four independent experiments.
|
|
Measurement of susceptibilities of recombinant phages carrying
different HIV-1 proteases to protease inhibitors.
The compounds
IND, RIT, SQV, and NFV were used to evaluate whether
-HIV-1
proteases were sensitive to different well-characterized HIV-1 protease
inhibitors. Infection of E. coli cells that expressed cI.HIV-1-cro with
-HIV-1p was carried out in
the presence of various micromolar concentrations of protease
inhibitors. As shown in Fig. 4A, the
growth of the four drug-naive
-HIV-1p proteases (HXB2, IRLL95,
JAD93, and JGR95) was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the four
protease inhibitors used. The inhibition of
-HIV-1p was observed
either with proteases from a laboratory strain (HXB2) or with proteases
isolated from three different HIV-1-infected patients. Similar to the
results shown in Fig. 3, the control
-HIV-1pinvHXB2 did not
replicate in the presence of the cI.HIV-1-cro
construct in either the absence or the presence of each of the four
different drugs (Fig. 4A). In addition, these four drugs did not affect
the growth of
-HIV-1pHXB2 or the
-HIV-1pinvHXB2 when control
cells that did not express the cI.HIV-1 construct were used
(Fig. 4B). Thus, cellular metabolism was unaffected by the micromolar
concentrations of the four drugs used in this study.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
(A) Inhibition of seven different -HIV-1 proteases in
the presence of different protease inhibitors. Cells transformed with
the cI.HIV-1-cro construct were infected with
-HIV-1 proteases in the absence or presence of different
concentrations of the HIV-1 protease inhibitors IND ( ), RIT ( ),
SQV ( ), and NFV ( ). At 3 h postinfection, the titer of the
resulting phage was determined. Each datum point is the average of two
independent experiments. (B) Control cells that did not express the
cI.HIV-1-cro construct were infected with
-HIV-1pHXB2 or -HIV-1pinvHXB2 phages in the presence of different
concentrations of the four HIV-1 protease inhibitors listed above.
Drugs did not have any effect on the growth of -HIV-1 proteases in
these control cells.
|
|
By using the data shown in Fig. 4A, the mean 50% inhibitory
concentration (IC50s) for the different
-HIV-1p and
protease inhibitors were calculated. The results are given in Table
2. For all wild-type samples analyzed
(
-HIV-1pHXB2, -IRLL95, -JAD93, and -JGR95), comparable
IC50s were obtained with RIT and SQV, with values ranging
between 1.28 and 3.73 and 1.16 and 1.88 µM, respectively. NFV was the
most potent inhibitor, with IC50s ranging between 0.17 and
0.30 µM. Three of the four phage samples showed a sensitivity to IND
that was similar to that obtained with RIT and SQV (IC50
range, 1.43 to 6.31 µM), and one phage (
-HIV-1pHXB2) was
moderately resistant to IND (IC50, 17.5 µM) (Table 2).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the lambda-based genetic
screening assay can be used not only to monitor the activity of an
HIV-1 protease but also to measure the extent of inhibition by
different anti-HIV-1 protease drugs.
Phages carrying mutated HIV-1 proteases are resistant to different
protease inhibitors.
To further demonstrate the specificity
of this bacteriophage lambda-based genetic system, phages
containing proteases with genotypic resistance to
anti-HIV-1-protease drugs (
-HIV-1pIRLL98, -JAD98, and -JGR97)
(Fig. 2) and obtained from three patients who failed treatment
with different antiprotease drugs (see Materials and Methods and Table
1) were propagated in the presence of four protease inhibitors (Fig.
4A). The sample
-HIV-1pIRLL98, which had the mutations 48V, 82A, and
90M, all of which are critical in the development of resistance to
anti-HIV-1 protease inhibitors, was highly resistant to the four drugs
tested (Fig. 4A and Table 2). Similarly, the sample
-HIV-1pJAD98,
with critical mutations at residues 82A, 84V, and 90M, was highly
resistant to IND (>219-fold), RIT (>159-fold), and SQV (>227-fold)
but was moderately sensitive to NFV (IC50, 10.13 µM). In
contrast, the phage in sample
-HIV-1pJGR98, which had only one
critical mutation, 82A, was highly resistant to RIT (>84-fold),
moderately sensitive to IND (IC50, 23.37 µM; eightfold
resistant), and highly sensitive to SQV and NFV (IC50s, 0.93 and 1.30 µM, respectively) (Fig. 4A and Table 2). Therefore, the
resistance to the drugs shown by phages containing mutated HIV-1
proteases further demonstrates that the actions of the four protease
inhibitors used in this study are specific to the HIV-1 protease. In
addition, these results also indicate that this bacteriophage lambda-based genetic system is able to detect a broader phenotypic resistance to the different protease inhibitors in phages carrying larger numbers of amino acid changes at positions critical to the
development of resistance to anti-HIV-1 protease drugs.
Competitive replication assay between phages carrying different
HIV-1 proteases in the presence and absence of drug pressure.
As
mentioned above, phages containing proteases with genotypic resistance
to anti-HIV-1 protease drugs (
-HIV-1pIRLL98, -JAD98, and -JGR97)
replicated up to nine times less efficiently than their wild-type
-HIV-1p counterparts (Fig. 3), suggesting that these mutated
proteases had less efficient enzymatic activity than wild-type HIV-1
proteases. In order to confirm the relative differences in fitness
observed between wild-type and mutated proteases, we used a competitive
phage replication assay. Cells carrying the
cI.HIV-1-cro construct were coinfected with the
same amount (PFU) of
-HIV-1pJAD93 and
-HIV-1pJAD98. After three
rounds of infection-selection, the phage DNAs present in the culture supernatants from the three infection cycles were amplified by PCR. The
sequences of the former PCR products showed that after three cycles of
culture competition 90% of the phage present was wild-type
-HIV-1pJAD93 (Fig. 5A). This result
further demonstrates the higher replication capacity of this phage
compared to that of mutated phage
-HIV-1pJAD98. As expected, when
competition with the former phage was carried out in the presence
of SQV, the wild-type phage was outgrown by mutated
-HIV-1pJAD98 phage (Fig. 5B). Hence, the bacteriophage lambda-based
genetic system also allows a direct comparison of the relative fitness
and degree of drug resistance of phages carrying different
drug-resistant HIV-1 proteases.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Competitive replication assay between phages carrying
patient sample JAD93 ( -HIV-1pJAD93) and JAD98 ( -HIV-1pJAD98)
proteases in the absence (A) or presence of SQV at a concentration of
62.5 µM (B). Data were generated on the basis of the relative peak
heights in electropherograms produced directly from the DNA sequence of
the phage genome at the different passages. For example, equal peak
heights for both wild-type and mutant bases indicate a 50:50 ratio.
Each datum point is the average of two independent experiments.
|
|
Comparison of protease inhibitor susceptibilities of recombinant
phages carrying HIV-1 proteases with ex vivo HIV-1 replication
assays.
To assess whether the drug susceptibility data obtained by
the bacteriophage lambda-based genetic assay was equivalent to that
obtained by standard ex vivo HIV-1 replication assays, the susceptibilities to the four protease inhibitors were determined in
MT-4 cells with the MTT-based assay for HXB2 and patient viruses IRLL95
and IRLL98. The results given in Table 3
showed that for viruses in naive samples (
-HIV-1pHXB2 and -IRLL95)
IND, SQV, and NFV had similar IC50s, ranging between 2.6 and 20.0 nM for IND, 4.3 and 9.8 nM for SQV, and 1.9 and 8.4 nM for
NFV. In contrast, RIT was a less potent inhibitor, with
IC50s ranging between 116 and 169 nM. Similar to the
results obtained with the lambda-based genetic assay, the virus
isolated from the mutated sample IRLL98 was found to be highly
resistant to RIT, SQV, and NFV and to a lesser extent to IND (Table 3).
Although some differences in drug susceptibility were detected between
the ex vivo assay and the lambda-based genetic system, that is, a lower
sensitivity to RIT was detected by the ex vivo assay (see Table 2 and
3), these results illustrate that protease amino acid substitutions that resulted in IND, RIT, SQV, and NFV resistance in intact virus also
appear to lower the sensitivity of the HIV-1 protease to the four drugs
in the bacteriophage lambda-based assay.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study we demonstrate that the bacteriophage
lambda-based genetic screening assay (28) can be used
not only to monitor the activities of different HIV-1 proteases
but also to measure the extent of inhibition by different anti-HIV-1
protease drugs. Moreover, the phenotypes of phages containing mutated
HIV-1 proteases can also be quantitatively evaluated by this assay, further increasing the utility of this lambda-based system. Protease, a
key enzyme in the replication and maturation of HIV-1, has become a
major target for antiviral therapy (1). Although encouraging clinical results have been obtained with anteretroviral combination therapy (23), the development of drug resistance during
therapy remains a major cause of treatment failure (25).
Fast and sensitive genotypic and phenotypic monitoring of resistance
could improve HIV-1 therapeutics. By rapidly identifying drug
resistance in infected patients, the best treatment regimens against
susceptible or resistant viral populations could be designed. The
rapid, simple, and safe lambda-based genetic screening system presented
here will expand the biochemical approaches for the phenotypic
detection of resistance to protease inhibitors. Additionally, the
lambda-based assay may be also appropriate for the identification of
new HIV-1 protease inhibitors because it is inexpensive, safe, and easy enough for the screening of large numbers of different drugs and replicates containing various concentrations of inhibitor.
The bacteriophage lambda-based genetic screening assay differs from
current ex vivo methods for the detection of phenotypic resistance to
HIV-1 protease inhibitors in that it needs micromolar concentrations of
drug (Table 2) to inhibit 50% of phage replicative events
(IC50), whereas the IC50s calculated by the ex
vivo assays are in the nanomolar range for the four protease inhibitors
tested (Table 3) (12, 13, 27). A possible explanation might
be the differences in cell uptake and/or metabolism between bacteria and human eucaryotic cells. Nevertheless, the results shown in Fig. 4
for phages carrying either wild-type or mutated proteases demonstrate
that it can be used to monitor HIV-1 protease inhibition with
micromolar concentrations of drug. Phages containing proteases with
different patterns of genotypic resistance (
-HIV-1pIRLL98, -JAD98,
and -JGR97) and that were obtained from patients failing different
antiretroviral treatments were compared. Differences in their
phenotypic resistance to the four protease inhibitors could be
monitored (Table 1 and Fig. 4A). Thus, phages containing the JGR97
protease that have only one substitution (82A) critical to the
development of current protease drug resistance were phenotypically resistant to RIT and IND (>84- and 8-fold, respectively) but were susceptible to SQV and were moderately sensitive to NFV (Table 2).
These findings are in agreement with those of previous studies carried
out by using ex vivo assays, in which the 82A mutation was implicated
in cross-resistance to IND and RIT, but in the absence of other
critical mutations, viruses carrying this substitution were still
sensitive to SQV and NFV (13, 16, 21, 29). At the time when
sample JGR97 was taken, patient JGR had begun a new treatment regimen
that included SQV and NFV plus two nucleoside analogues. Interestingly,
the plasma viral load in this patient (<20 copies/ml) had remained
undetectable after more than 2 years of treatment with this
antiretroviral therapy (data not shown). Likewise, the results obtained
in the present study with phage
-HIV-1pIRLL98, the one with three
substitutions that are critical to the development of phenotypic
protease inhibitor resistance (48V, 82A and 90M) (Fig. 2), confirmed
previous reports that revealed the loss of susceptibility to IND, RIT,
SQV, and NFV of this mutant with multiple mutations (13,
27). Patient IRLL and patient JAD did not achieve viral RNA
suppression in plasma after treatment with several drug combinations,
stressing the dangers of selecting suboptimal sequential antiretroviral
therapies for HIV-1-infected patients (2). Overall, these
findings confirm the clinical management benefits of HIV-1 resistance
testing. Because some quantitative differences were observed when the
bacteriophage lambda-based genetic screening system was compared to
eucaryotic cell culture assays (compare Tables 2 and 3), the
lambda-based assay can be seen as a complement to current viral
propagation assays for the monitoring of drug sensitivities. One
advantage of the lambda-based assay is that current ex vivo methods
rely on human cell culture systems infected with live virus. These methods are time-consuming and require the use of biosafety
precautions. The gene for HIV-1 protease can be amplified from the
blood of infected patients, ligated to predigested lambda DNA, and
packaged in vitro in 24 h. The lambda-based genetic screen for the
determination of the HIV-1 protease phenotype needs only 12 additional
h (see Materials and Methods). Therefore, the genetic screening assay described here can easily be performed in 2 to 3 working days. In
contrast, current cell culture systems used to detect phenotypic resistance to HIV-1 inhibitors, such as the recombinant virus assay
(13) or the coculture of infected peripheral blood
mononuclear cells with seronegative donor peripheral blood mononuclear
cells (24), require at least 3 to 4 weeks for virus
isolation and phenotypic characterization. By taking advantage of the
genetics of bacteriophage lambda, an additional important aspect of
this genetic assay is that it allows the rapid detection of functional minority viral populations. The selection of different phage clones (Fig. 1) and reexamination of their phenotypes and genotypes might facilitate the identification of minority strains of resistant viruses.
Since multiple-drug-resistant mutants were not commonly found in bulk
sequences from previously treated patients who failed antiretroviral
combination therapy (19), detection of minor populations of
resistant virus in those patients may improve the utility of genotypic
and phenotypic monitoring of resistance for clinical management.
Differences in HIV-1 protease activity can also be measured with the
bacteriophage lambda-based genetic screening system. The activities of
the protease inhibitor-resistant phages
-HIV-1pIRLL98,
-HIV-1pJAD98, and
-HIV-1pJGR97 are reduced nine-, five-, and fourfold, respectively, in comparison to the activities of the phages
containing naive proteases (Fig. 3). It is noteworthy that
-HIV-1pIRLL98, the phage most resistant to the four protease inhibitors tested, was the phage that showed the lowest level of
protease activity (Fig. 3). Several protease inhibitor resistance mutations, alone or in combination, can reduce the replicative capacity
of HIV-1 (6, 10, 18, 20, 31). In addition to the data
provided by the independent determination of the protease activity of
each
-HIV-1p (Fig. 3), the system described here also allows direct
comparison of relative HIV-1 protease fitness. The relative fitness of
two phages that differ in their HIV-1 protease genotypes can be
directly compared since two phage populations in a culture compete with
each other until one phage outgrows the other (Fig. 5). We have found
that in the absence of protease inhibitors the mutated protease
obtained from patient JAD after 2.5 years of protease inhibitor therapy
(Table 1) showed a lower level of fitness than the baseline
wild-type virus (Fig. 5A). In the presence of drug, however,
-HIV-1pJAD98 outgrew
-HIV-1pJAD93 (Fig. 5B), confirming the
replication advantage of the mutant phage under drug pressure. The
relative fitness in the absence of drugs, as measured here, can be
associated with the catalytic efficiency of the mutant enzyme.
Estimation of the effect of drug resistance on viral fitness may have
clinical relevance because it can affect viral pathogenesis and
transmissibility. The potential ability to rapidly analyze the relative
fitness of drug-resistant proteases in this system may aid in
predicting the viral genotypic and phenotypic changes in the course of
HIV-1 infection and antiviral therapy.
Finally, another application of the bacteriophage lambda-based genetic
screening system is the characterization of an in vitro-generated library of mutated HIV-1 proteases. The analysis of a large collection of mutant viral proteases will ease studies on structure-function relationships, viral genetic evolution, and novel drug-resistant mutants. Since this system has the potential to isolate enzymes with
low levels of catalytic activity (28), coupling of random sequences with positive genetic selection will allow the study of
functional mutants which are unlikely to be isolated from
HIV-1-infected patients. The former mutants may be of interest in the
characterization of catalytic properties of proteases in the absence or
the presence of drugs (M. Cabana and M.-A. Martínez,
unpublished data). Identification and characterization of new residues
implicated in protease inhibitor resistance from a random library of
HIV-1 protease mutants may also be useful in the design and screening
of new antiprotease inhibitors.
In summary, the bacteriophage lambda-based genetic screening system
described here may be of use in predicting the activities and
phenotypes of HIV-1 proteases in the course of HIV-1 infection and
antiretroviral therapy. Characterization of mutant HIV-1 proteases and
the search for new inhibitors can be also be facilitated by this
genetic screening system.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank H. J. Sices and T. M. Kristie for the
cI.HIV-cro constructs and for helping us in
setting up the bacteriophage lambda-based genetic system.
This work was supported by the irsiCaixa Foundation and by grants from
the Spanish Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria 98/0054-03 and
98/0868. M. A. Martínez visited T. M. Kristie's
laboratory at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Md.) with
support from a fellowship from the Human Frontier Science Program
(Strasbourg, France).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address:
Fundació irsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Germans Triasi
Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain. Phone: 34-934656374. Fax: 34-934653968. E-mail: mamartz{at}ns.hugtip.scs.es.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Boden, D., and M. Markowitz.
1998.
Resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:2775-2783[Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Cabana, M.,
B. Clotet, and M. A. Martinez.
1999.
Emergence and genetic evolution of HIV-1 variants with mutations conferring resistance to multiple reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors.
J. Med. Virol.
59:480-490[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chun, T. W.,
L. Stuyver,
S. B. Mizell,
L. A. Ehler,
J. A. Mican,
M. Baseler,
A. L. Lloyd,
M. A. Nowak, and A. S. Fauci.
1997.
Presence of an inducible HIV-1 latent reservoir during highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13193-13197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Coffin, J. M.,
H. S. Hughes, and H. E. Varmus.
1997.
Retroviruses.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Condra, J. H.,
W. A. Schleif,
O. M. Blahy,
L. J. Gabryelski,
D. J. Graham,
J. C. Quintero,
A. Rhodes,
H. L. Robbins,
E. Roth,
M. Shivaprakash, et al.
1995.
In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitors.
Nature
374:569-571[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Croteau, G.,
L. Doyon,
D. Thibeault,
G. McKercher,
L. Pilote, and D. Lamarre.
1997.
Impaired fitness of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants with high-level resistance to protease inhibitors.
J. Virol.
71:1089-1096[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Finzi, D.,
M. Hermankova,
T. Pierson,
L. M. Carruth,
C. Buck,
R. E. Chaisson,
T. C. Quinn,
K. Chadwick,
J. Margolick,
R. Brookmeyer,
J. Gallant,
M. Markowitz,
D. D. Ho,
D. D. Richman, and R. F. Siliciano.
1997.
Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Science
278:1295-1300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Furtado, M. R.,
D. S. Callaway,
J. P. Phair,
K. J. Kunstman,
J. L. Stanton,
C. A. Macken,
A. S. Perelson, and S. M. Wolinsky.
1999.
Persistence of HIV-1 transcription in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells in patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy.
N. Engl. J. Med.
340:1614-1622[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Gulick, R. M.,
J. W. Mellors,
D. Havlir,
J. J. Eron,
C. Gonzalez,
D. McMahon,
D. D. Richman,
F. T. Valentine,
L. Jonas,
A. Meibohm,
E. A. Emini, and J. A. Chodakewitz.
1997.
Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy.
N. Engl. J. Med.
337:734-739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Gulnik, S. V.,
L. I. Suvorov,
B. Liu,
B. Yu,
B. Anderson,
H. Mitsuya, and J. W. Erickson.
1995.
Kinetic characterization and cross-resistance patterns of HIV-1 protease mutants selected under drug pressure.
Biochemistry
34:9282-9287[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hammer, S. M.,
K. E. Squires,
M. D. Hughes,
J. M. Grimes,
L. M. Demeter,
J. S. Currier,
J. J. Eron, Jr.,
J. E. Feinberg,
H. H. Balfour, Jr.,
L. R. Deyton,
J. A. Chodakewitz, and M. A. Fischl.
1997.
A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team.
N. Engl. J. Med.
337:725-733[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Hecht, F. M.,
R. M. Grant,
C. J. Petropoulos,
B. Dillon,
M. A. Chesney,
H. Tian,
N. S. Hellmann,
N. I. Bandrapalli,
L. Digilio,
B. Branson, and J. O. Kahn.
1998.
Sexual transmission of an HIV-1 variant resistant to multiple reverse-transcriptase and protease inhibitors.
N. Engl. J. Med.
339:307-311[Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hertogs, K.,
M. P. de Bethune,
V. Miller,
T. Ivens,
P. Schel,
A. Van Cauwenberge,
C. Van Den Eynde,
V. Van Gerwen,
H. Azijn,
M. Van Houtte,
F. Peeters,
S. Staszewski,
M. Conant,
S. Bloor,
S. Kemp,
B. Larder, and R. Pauwels.
1998.
A rapid method for simultaneous detection of phenotypic resistance to inhibitors of protease and reverse transcriptase in recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients treated with antiretroviral drugs.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:269-276[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hirsch, M. S.,
B. Conway,
R. T. D'Aquila,
V. A. Johnson,
F. Brun-Vezinet,
B. Clotet,
L. M. Demeter,
S. M. Hammer,
D. M. Jacobsen,
D. R. Kuritzkes,
C. Loveday,
J. W. Mellors,
S. Vella, and D. D. Richman.
1998.
Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults with HIV infection: implications for clinical management. International AIDS Society USA Panel.
JAMA
279:1984-1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Ibanez, A.,
T. Puig,
J. Elias,
B. Clotet,
L. Ruiz, and M. A. Martinez.
1999.
Quantification of integrated and total HIV-1 DNA after long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients.
AIDS
13:1045-1049[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Markowitz, M.,
H. Mo,
D. J. Kempf,
D. W. Norbeck,
T. N. Bhat,
J. W. Erickson, and D. D. Ho.
1995.
Selection and analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants with increased resistance to ABT-538, a novel protease inhibitor.
J. Virol.
69:701-706[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Martinez, M. A.,
M. Cabana,
A. Ibanez,
B. Clotet,
A. Arno, and L. Ruiz.
1999.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genetic evolution in patients with prolonged suppression of plasma viremia.
Virology
256:180-187[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Martinez-Picado, J.,
A. V. Savara,
L. Sutton, and R. T. D'Aquila.
1999.
Replicative fitness of protease inhibitor-resistant mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
73:3744-3752[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Martinez-Picado, J.,
L. Sutton,
M. P. De Pasquale,
A. V. Savara, and R. T. D'Aquila.
1999.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 cloning vectors for antiretroviral resistance testing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:2943-2951[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Maschera, B.,
G. Darby,
G. Palu,
L. L. Wright,
M. Tisdale,
R. Myers,
E. D. Blair, and E. S. Furfine.
1996.
Human immunodeficiency virus. Mutations in the viral protease that confer resistance to saquinavir increase the dissociation rate constant of the protease-saquinavir complex.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:33231-33235[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Molla, A.,
M. Korneyeva,
Q. Gao,
S. Vasavanonda,
P. J. Schipper,
H. M. Mo,
M. Markowitz,
T. Chernyavskiy,
P. Niu,
N. Lyons,
A. Hsu,
G. R. Granneman,
D. D. Ho,
C. A. Boucher,
J. M. Leonard,
D. W. Norbeck, and D. J. Kempf.
1996.
Ordered accumulation of mutations in HIV protease confers resistance to ritonavir.
Nat. Med.
2:760-766[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Myers, G.,
B. Foley,
J. W. Mellors,
B. Korber,
K. T. Jeang, and S. Wain-Hobson.
1996.
Human retroviruses and AIDS database.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex.
|
| 23.
|
Palella, F. J., Jr.,
K. M. Delaney,
A. C. Moorman,
M. O. Loveless,
J. Fuhrer,
G. A. Satten,
D. J. Aschman, and S. D. Holmberg.
1998.
Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators.
N. Engl. J. Med.
338:853-860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Pauwels, R.,
J. Balzarini,
M. Baba,
R. Snoeck,
D. Schols,
P. Herdewijn,
J. Desmyter, and E. De Clercq.
1988.
Rapid and automated tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay for the detection of anti-HIV compounds.
J. Virol. Methods
20:309-321[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Perrin, L., and A. Telenti.
1998.
HIV treatment failure: testing for HIV resistance in clinical practice.
Science
280:1871-1873[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Ptashne, M.
1986.
A genetic switch.
Cell Press, Cambridge, Mass.
|
| 27.
|
Shafer, R. W.,
M. A. Winters,
S. Palmer, and T. C. Merigan.
1998.
Multiple concurrent reverse transcriptase and protease mutations and multidrug resistance of HIV-1 isolates from heavily treated patients.
Ann. Intern. Med.
128:906-911[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Sices, H. J., and T. M. Kristie.
1998.
A genetic screen for the isolation and characterization of site-specific proteases.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2828-2833[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Tisdale, M.,
R. E. Myers,
B. Maschera,
N. R. Parry,
N. M. Oliver, and E. D. Blair.
1995.
Cross-resistance analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants individually selected for resistance to five different protease inhibitors.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1704-1710[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Wong, J. K.,
M. Hezareh,
H. F. Gunthard,
D. V. Havlir,
C. C. Ignacio,
C. A. Spina, and D. D. Richman.
1997.
Recovery of replication-competent HIV despite prolonged suppression of plasma viremia.
Science
278:1291-1295[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Zennou, V.,
F. Mammano,
S. Paulous,
D. Mathez, and F. Clavel.
1998.
Loss of viral fitness associated with multiple Gag and Gag-Pol processing defects in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants selected for resistance to protease inhibitors in vivo.
J. Virol.
72:3300-3306[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Zhang, L.,
B. Ramratnam,
K. Tenner-Racz,
Y. He,
M. Vesanen,
S. Lewin,
A. Talal,
P. Racz,
A. S. Perelson,
B. T. Korber,
M. Markowitz, and D. D. Ho.
1999.
Quantifying residual HIV-1 replication in patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy.
N. Engl. J. Med.
340:1605-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1132-1139, Vol. 44, No. 5
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.