Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1375-1376, Vol. 44, No. 5
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Bioavailability of Once- and Twice-Daily Regimens
of Didanosine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected
Children
Thalita
Abreu,1
Karen
Plaisance,2,*
Vivian
Rexroad,3
Susie
Nogueira,1
Ricardo Hugo
Oliveira,1
Lucia A.
Evangelista,1
Rosana
Rangel,1
Irene S.
Silva,1
Cathy
Knupp,4 and
John S.
Lambert5
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil1; Institute of Human
Virology5 and School of
Pharmacy,2 University of Maryland, and
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions,3
Baltimore, Maryland; and Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Princeton,
New Jersey4
Received 26 May 1999/Returned for modification 29 November
1999/Accepted 7 February 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The bioavailability of didanosine at 180 mg/m2 once
daily was compared to that at 90 mg/m2 twice daily in 24 children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. Children
were studied at steady state using optimal sampling and prior
pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. Relative bioavailability was
0.95 ± 0.49, supporting the potential clinical adequacy of
once-daily dosing.
 |
TEXT |
The active form of didanosine has an
extended intracellular half-life, suggesting its potential for
once-daily administration (10). Pediatric experience
suggested that didanosine doses of 90 to 180 mg/m2 were
less well absorbed than those of 20 to 60 mg/m2. However,
no difference in the bioavailability of didanosine at 90 mg/m2 (13%; range, 2 to 29%) and 180 mg/m2
(14%; range, 12 to 17%) was observed (1). Reevaluation of once-daily didanosine combined with hydroxyurea (J. Rusnak, A. Berry,
K. Sharkey, B. Stinnette, K. Dyall, S. Zhou, and M. A. Vahey,
Program Abstr. 12th World AIDS Conf., abstr. 12352, 1998) or other
long-acting antiretrovirals (A. Haberl, P. Gute, A. Carlebach, M. Mosch, Y. Miller, and S. Staszewski, Program Abstr. 12th World AIDS
Conf., abstr. 22398, 1998) is under way, and preliminary results with
adults suggest the potential utility of these regimens (5, 6,
11; Haberl et al., Program Abstr. 12th World AIDS Conf.;
Rusnak et al., Program Abstr. 12th World AIDS Conf.). The objective of
this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of didanosine
when it was administered as a single daily dose of 180 mg/m2 and in a standard regimen of 90 mg/m2
given twice daily to children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
HIV-infected children at the Pediatric Institute of the Federal
University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1996 were
invited to participate, and informed consents were signed by their
legal guardians. An independent ethics committee of the Federal
University of Rio de Janeiro approved this trial. Inclusion criteria
were symptomatic HIV infection and the receipt of buffered didanosine
tablets, alone or in combination with zidovudine. Children with
active opportunistic infections, pancreatitis, or peripheral neuropathy
were excluded.
The didanosine suspension was prepared by the Pediatric Institute
pharmacist at study entry and monthly with Videx pediatric powder for
solution and Maalox Plus. The reconstituted suspension was usable for 1 month. Children received didanosine twice daily (90 mg/m2
every 12 h) during the first 45 days of the study and then once daily (180 mg/m2) during the remaining 45 days of the
study. Medication was shaken before being used and stored at 2 to
8°C; doses were taken on an empty stomach.
Three optimally spaced blood samples, at 0.5, 1, and 3 h postdose,
were obtained following the morning dose on day 45 of each of the two
regimens; plasma was separated and stored at
20°C until analysis, 7 months later. Plasma samples were analyzed by Analytical Solutions,
Inc., using a validated radioimmunoassay with a lower limit of
quantitation of 0.003 mg/liter. Inter- and intraday coefficients of
variation were less than 10% across the range of 8 to 160 ng/ml.
Didanosine pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by Bayesian
estimation with a one-compartment oral absorption model and no lag
time. A priori estimates for the mean pediatric clearance (1,278 ml/min/m2), half-life (0.95 h), and time to maximum
concentrations in plasma (Cmax) (0.5 h) were
obtained from the literature (2, 7). All modeling was
performed using WinNonlin (version 1.0; Scientific Consulting, Inc.)
with unity weighting. Relative bioavailabilities of the once- and
twice-daily regimens were determined by dose-normalized ratios of areas
under the steady-state concentration-time curves (AUCs).
Pharmacokinetic parameters between the two treatment regimens were
compared using a repeated-measure one-way analysis of variance. Bioequivalency was assessed by evaluation of the means and 90% confidence intervals of the differences between the logarithmic transformed dose-normalized AUCs determined for the once-daily and
twice-daily regimens.
Twenty-four children were evaluated. Most children had advanced HIV
infection; 16 children had CD4 percentages of less than 30%, and 20 children were receiving concurrent zidovudine. Thirteen children were
male, and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age and body surface
areas were 4.8 (2.9) years and 0.68 (0.16) m2, respectively.
Data from two subjects, numbers 11 and 23, were excluded from analysis;
the former had uniformly low concentrations in plasma, and the latter
did not complete the study. Mean (SD) concentrations in plasma observed
for the twice-daily and once-daily regimens were 0.508 (0.347) and
0.971 (0.693) mg/liter at 1 h and 0.090 (0.085) and 0.167 (0.108)
mg/liter at 3 h. Table 1 summarizes the pharmacokinetic parameters observed for the once- and twice-daily regimens.
The pharmacokinetic parameters, with the exception of AUCs, did not
differ between regimens. The substantial variability in Cmaxs precluded observation of a significant
difference in Cmaxs between regimens. The
bioavailability of the once-daily regimen relative to that of the
twice-daily regimen was 0.95 ± 0.49 (range, 0.22 to 1.97),
suggesting that the total exposure to didanosine was similar whether
the drug was given once or twice daily. There was, however, significant
inter- and intrasubject variability in AUCs determined from the two
regimens (Fig. 1). This variability resulted in the 90% confidence interval for the transformed AUC (0.65 to 1.01) falling outside the regulatory limits (0.80 to 1.25) for
bioequivalence. Thus, although the regimens are likely to perform
similarly in a clinical setting, from a Food and Drug Administration
perspective, these regimens would not be considered bioequivalent.
The pharmacokinetics of didanosine in both pediatric and adult
populations are characterized by significant variability (1-4, 7-10). Factors contributing to this variability between studies can include differences in diet, formulation, concurrent medications, and drug assays. All of our children were receiving a didanosine suspension prepared in a standard fashion by the study pharmacist. The
majority of children were also receiving zidovudine. While all parents
were given standard instructions concerning the administration of
didanosine, the marked intra- and interpatient variability may reflect
the variability in the actual administration of the drug that occurs
outside a strict research environment.
Analysis of our data suggests that the extent of absorption of
didanosine when it is given as a single daily dose approximates that of
the standard, twice-daily regimen, 0.95 ± 0.49. There has been
recent interest in prescribing didanosine on a once-daily schedule for
adults in an effort to simplify complex antiretroviral regimens. A
number of small studies of adults (5, 6, 11; Haberl
et al., Program Abstr. 12th World AIDS Conf.; Rusnak et al., Program
Abstr. 12th World AIDS Conf.) indicate that both regimens are safe and
appear clinically equivalent, as judged by changes in CD4 counts and
HIV-1 RNA viral loads. Our study suggests that once-daily dosing of
didanosine may be applied in the pediatric setting as well.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Michelle Luby for assistance with manuscript
preparation and Bristol-Myers-Squibb of South America for provision of
Videx Pediatric Powder for Oral Solution.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of
Maryland School of Pharmacy, 100 Penn St., Baltimore, MD 21201. Phone: (410) 706-4335. Fax: (410) 706-6580. E-mail:
kplaisan{at}rx.umaryland.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Balis, F. M.,
P. A. Pizzo,
K. M. Butler,
M. E. Hawkins,
P. Brouwers,
R. N. Husson,
F. Jacobsen,
S. M. Blaney,
J. Gress,
P. Jarosinski, and D. G. Poplack.
1992.
Clinical pharmacology of 2',3'-dideoxyinosine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.
J. Infect. Dis.
165:99-104[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Butler, K. M.,
R. N. Husson,
F. M. Balis,
P. Brouwers,
J. Eddy,
D. El-Amin,
D. Poplack,
S. Santacroce,
D. Venzon,
L. Wiener,
P. Wolters, and P. A. Pizzo.
1991.
Dideoxyinosine in children with symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection.
N. Engl. J. Med.
324:137-144[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Drusano, G. L.,
G. J. Yuen,
G. Morse,
T. P. Cooley,
M. Seidlin,
J. S. Lambert,
H. A. Liebman,
F. T. Valentine, and R. Dolin.
1992.
Impact of bioavailability on determination of the maximal tolerated dose of 2',3'-dideoxyinosine in phase I trials.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:1280-1283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Gibb, D.,
M. Barry,
S. Ormesher,
L. Nokes,
M. Seefried,
C. Giaquinto, and D. Back.
1995.
Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and dideoxyinosine alone and in combination in children with HIV infection.
Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
39:527-530[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Hoetelmans, R. M.,
R. P. van Heeswijk,
M. Profijt,
J. W. Mulder,
P. L. Meenhorst,
J. M. Lange,
P. Reiss, and J. H. Beijnen.
1998.
Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics and renal clearance of didanosine during once and twice daily dosing in HIV-1 infected individuals.
AIDS
12:F211-F216[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Keiser, P.,
D. Turner,
O. Ramilo,
M. B. Kvanli,
J. W. Smith, and N. Nassar.
1998.
An open-label pilot study of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily didanosine versus twice-daily didanosine.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
27:400-401[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Kline, M. W.,
C. V. Fletcher,
M. E. Federici,
A. T. Harris,
K. D. Evans,
V. L. Rutkiewicz,
W. T. Shearer, and L. M. Dunkle.
1996.
Combination therapy with stavudine and didanosine in children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection: pharmacokinetic properties, safety and immunologic and virologic effects.
Pediatrics
97:886-890[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Lambert, J. S.,
M. Seidlin,
R. C. Reichman,
C. S. Plank,
M. Laverty,
G. D. Morse,
C. Knupp,
C. McLaren,
C. Pettinelli,
F. T. Valentine, and R. Dolin.
1990.
2',3'-Dideoxyinosine (ddI) in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or AIDS-related complex: a phase I trial.
N. Engl. J. Med.
322:1333-1340[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Mueller, B. U.,
P. A. Pizzo,
M. Farley,
R. N. Husson,
J. Goldsmith,
A. Kovacs,
L. Woods,
J. Ono,
J. A. Church,
P. Brouwers,
P. Jarosinski,
D. Venzon, and F. M. Balis.
1994.
Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the combination of zidovudine and didanosine in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.
J. Pediatr.
125:142-146[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Perry, C. M., and J. A. Balfour.
1996.
Didanosine: an update on its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of HIV disease.
Drugs
52:928-962[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Reynes, J.,
R. Denisi,
P. Massip,
J. Izopet,
I. Pellegrin, and M. Segondy.
1999.
Once-daily administration of didanosine in combination with stavudine in antiretroviral-naïve patients. The STADI Group.
J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.
22:103-105.
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2000, p. 1375-1376, Vol. 44, No. 5
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rongkavilit, C., Thaithumyanon, P., Chuenyam, T., Damle, B. D., Limpongsanurak, S., Boonrod, C., Srigritsanapol, A., Hassink, E. A. M., Hoetelmans, R. M. W., Cooper, D. A., Lange, J. M. A., Ruxrungtham, K., Phanuphak, P.
(2001). Pharmacokinetics of Stavudine and Didanosine Coadministered with Nelfinavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Exposed Neonates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
45: 3585-3590
[Abstract]
[Full Text]