Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, R.-K. Articles by McGinnis, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, R.-K. Articles by McGinnis, M. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2000, p. 1734-1736, Vol. 44, No. 6
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Voriconazole, Itraconazole, and Amphotericin B against Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum

Ren-Kai Li,¹ Meral A. Ciblak,¹ Nicole Nordoff,² Lester Pasarell,² David W. Warnock,^1,* and Michael R. McGinnis²

Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,¹ and Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0609²

Received 23 September 1999/Returned for modification 7 March 2000/Accepted 21 March 2000

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Text References

The in vitro activity of voriconazole was compared to those of itraconazole and amphotericin B against the mold forms of 304 isolates of three dimorphic fungi, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum. MICs were determined by a broth microdilution adaptation of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A procedure. RPMI 1640 medium was used for tests with voriconazole and itraconazole, whereas Antibiotic Medium 3 with 2% glucose was used for amphotericin B. Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were also determined. Amphotericin B was active against all three dimorphic fungi, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited (MIC₉₀s) of 0.5 to 1 µg/ml. Itraconazole had MIC₉₀s of 0.06 µg/ml for H. capsulatum, 0.125 µg/ml for B. dermatitidis, and 1 µg/ml for C. immitis. The MIC₉₀s of voriconazole were 0.25 µg/ml for all three fungi. Amphotericin B was fungicidal for B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum with MFCs at which 90% of strains tested are killed (MFC₉₀s) of 0.5 and 2 µg/ml, respectively. It was less active against C. immitis, with MFCs ranging from 0.5 to >16 µg/ml. Voriconazole and itraconazole were lethal for most isolates of B. dermatitidis, with MFC₅₀s and MFC₉₀s of 0.125 and 4 µg/ml, respectively. Both azoles were fungicidal for some isolates of H. capsulatum, with MFC₅₀s of 2 and 8 µg/ml for itraconazole and voriconazole, respectively; neither had a lethal effect upon C. immitis. Our results suggest that voriconazole possesses promising activity against these important human pathogens.

	TEXT

Top Abstract Text References

Until recently, amphotericin B has been the principal agent for the treatment of most systemic fungal infections, despite the fact that its use is limited by a range of serious side effects, particularly renal toxicity (5). Lipid-based preparations have reduced the toxicity but have not significantly increased its efficacy (19). Although the imidazole agent ketoconazole proved efficacious for some chronic forms of blastomycosis, histoplasmosis, and coccidioidomycosis, it was not regarded as a first-line treatment for life-threatening or severe infections (7). More recently, the triazole itraconazole has become the treatment of choice for mild to moderate forms of histoplasmosis and blastomycosis. Coccidioidomycosis can be treated with either itraconazole or fluconazole, with the latter agent being the drug of choice for coccidioidal meningitis (6). Because not all cases respond to treatment with amphotericin B, itraconazole, or fluconazole, there is a continuing need for new antifungal agents.

Voriconazole (UK-109,496) is a new triazole antifungal agent that shows promise for the treatment of a broad spectrum of fungal pathogens, including Aspergillus species, Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, Penicillium marneffei, Scedosporium apiospermum, and others (1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12-15, 17). Voriconazole has been reported to have fungistatic activity against Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum (3, 9). However, the number of isolates that have been studied is limited, and there are no data regarding its possible fungicidal activity against the dimorphic fungi. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro fungistatic and fungicidal activities of voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against B. dermatitidis, C. immitis, and H. capsulatum.

(This work was presented in part at the 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, Calif., 26 to 29 September 1999.)

Test isolates. A total of 304 isolates were tested. These comprised 100 clinical isolates each of B. dermatitidis and C. immitis and 104 clinical isolates of H. capsulatum. Isolates of C. immitis were retrieved from storage in 50% glycerol at 70°C and then subcultured onto slants of Sabouraud glucose agar (SGA) incubated at 25°C. Isolates of B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum were retrieved from storage at 70°C and subcultured onto slants of brain heart infusion agar incubated at 30°C. Prior to testing, each isolate was recultured on the same medium to verify purity and induce arthroconidium or conidium formation. All procedures were performed within a class II biological safety cabinet in a biosafety level 3 laboratory.

Antifungal agents. The three antifungal agents were obtained from their respective manufacturers: voriconazole from Pfizer Inc., Central Research Division, Groton, Conn.; itraconazole from Janssen Pharmaceutica, Titusville, N.J.; and amphotericin B from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, N.J. Stock solutions were prepared in dimethylformamide (voriconazole) or dimethyl sulfoxide (amphotericin B and itraconazole). Further dilutions of each antifungal agent were prepared as outlined in National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) document M27-A (10). Voriconazole and itraconazole were tested in RPMI 1640 medium (with L-glutamine and without sodium bicarbonate) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (MOPS; Sigma). Amphotericin B was tested in Bacto Antibiotic Medium 3 (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 2% glucose. The drug dilutions were dispensed in 0.1-ml amounts in sterile plastic snap-cap tubes (12 by 75 mm) that were then stored at 70°C until needed.

Antifungal susceptibility testing. Broth macrodilution testing was performed in accordance with the guidelines in NCCLS document M27-A (10). Conidial suspensions of each isolate were prepared in RPMI 1640 medium (for voriconazole and itraconazole) or Antibiotic Medium 3 with 2% glucose (for amphotericin B) and adjusted spectrophotometrically to 0.5 × 10³ to 2.5 × 10⁴ CFU/ml as demonstrated by quantitative colony counts on SGA plates. Aliquots of 0.9 ml of inoculum suspension were added to each of the previously prepared tubes containing serial dilutions of antifungal agents. Final drug concentrations were 0.03 to 32 µg/ml for voriconazole and itraconazole and 0.03 to 16 µg/ml for amphotericin B. Control tubes without drug contained medium with 1% solvent.

MIC endpoints were determined after 48 h of incubation at 35°C or after the control tubes showed appropriate growth. For amphotericin B, the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of drug that completely inhibited growth. For the azoles, the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration resulting in 80% inhibition of growth compared to that for untreated controls (10).

The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) was determined by removing 10 µl of the contents from all tubes showing no visible growth and from the last tube to show growth. The samples were spread onto brain heart infusion agar (B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum) or SGA in plates (C. immitis). These were incubated at 30°C (25°C for C. immitis) until the inoculum from the tube containing the lowest drug concentration showed good growth. The MFC was defined as the lowest concentration that allowed the growth of three or fewer colonies. This represents killing of >97% of the original inoculum.

Quality control. Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and Paecilomyces variotii ATCC 22319 were included in each batch of tests.

Results. All C. immitis isolates produced sufficient growth to determine MICs after 48 or 72 h of incubation. For B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum, the MICs were determined after 5 and 7 days, respectively. Likewise, the MFCs for these organisms were determined after 7 days of incubation. The test conditions used did not result in conversion of B. dermatitidis or H. capsulatum isolates to the yeast form. The MIC ranges for the two quality control strains are listed in Table 1. The results for these organisms were within the expected ranges.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1.   Quality control MIC ranges of antifungal agents

Table 2 summarizes the in vitro susceptibilities of the 304 isolates tested to amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole. The data are presented as MIC and MFC ranges and as the drug concentrations required to inhibit or kill 50 and 90% of the isolates of each species (MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀, MFC₅₀, and MFC₉₀). Amphotericin B was active against B. dermatitidis, C. immitis, and H. capsulatum, with MIC₉₀s of 0.5 or 1 µg/ml. With one exception, the MIC₉₀s of itraconazole and voriconazole were lower than those for amphotericin B, ranging from 0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml. The exception was C. immitis, for which the MIC₉₀ of itraconazole was 1 µg/ml. In addition, for a few isolates of B. dermatitidis, the itraconazole and/or voriconazole MICs were 16 µg/ml or higher. Nonetheless, the MIC₉₀s of voriconazole were 0.25 µg/ml for all three dimorphic fungi. The corresponding values for itraconazole ranged from 0.125 µg/ml for B. dermatitidis to 1 µg/ml for C. immitis.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2.   In vitro susceptibilities of 304 isolates to voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B

The MFC ranges of the three compounds showed marked differences. Amphotericin B was fungicidal for B. dermatitidis, with an MFC₉₀ of 0.5 µg/ml. It was less active against C. immitis and H. capsulatum, having MFC₉₀s of >16 and 2 µg/ml, respectively. Voriconazole and itraconazole were fungicidal for many isolates of B. dermatitidis, with MFC₅₀s and MFC₉₀s of 0.125 and 4 µg/ml, respectively. Both azoles were fungicidal for some isolates of H. capsulatum, with MFC₅₀s of 2 and 8 µg/ml for itraconazole and voriconazole, respectively. Neither had a fungicidal effect on C. immitis.

Discussion. Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent with a broad spectrum of fungistatic action in vitro, including action against Aspergillus species, Candida species, C. neoformans, P. marneffei, and S. apiospermum (1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12-15, 17). Voriconazole has also been reported to be a promising agent for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and human immunodeficiency virus-associated oral candidiasis (D. W. Denning, A. del Favero, E. Gluckman, D. Norfolk, M. Ruhnke, S. Yonren, P. Troke, and N. Sarantis, Abstr. 35th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F80, p. 126, 1995; B. Dupont, D. Denning, H. Lode, S. Yonren, P. F. Troke, and N. Sarantis, Abstr. 35th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F81, p. 126, 1995; P. F. Troke, K. W. Brammer, C. A. Hitchcock, S. Yonren, and N. Sarantis, Abstr. 35th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F73, p. 125, 1995). To date, however, there have been no published reports of its clinical use in patients with blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, or histoplasmosis.

Our findings extend those of several recent studies which showed that voriconazole is more active in vitro than amphotericin B against the mold forms of the dimorphic fungi B. dermatitidis, C. immitis, and H. capsulatum (3, 9). Our results indicate that the fungistatic effect of voriconazole is similar to, or better than, that of itraconazole against these pathogens. In addition, both of these triazole agents are fungicidal in vitro for some isolates of B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum, although neither had a lethal effect on C. immitis. These MFC data complement recent reports which indicate that voriconazole has a fungicidal effect upon Aspergillus spp. (1, 6, 13), as well as on a number of dematiaceous molds, including Cladophialophora bantiana, Fonsecaea pedrosoi, Phialophora parasitica, and Wangiella dermatitidis (6).

The relative importance of the fungicidal rather than the fungistatic effects of antifungal agents in vitro is unclear. In the case of amphotericin B, the MFC has been found to be a better predictor of clinical outcome in patients with candidemia (11) and trichosporonosis (18). Morever, there is presently no consensus as to how the MFCs of antifungal agents should be determined or defined. In this study, the MFC was defined as the lowest concentration of antifungal agent that resulted in the growth of three or fewer colonies, which corresponds to a 97% kill rate. Other investigators, who have transferred 100 µl from each MIC tube, have defined the MFC as the lowest concentration of agent that permits the growth of five or fewer colonies. This corresponds to a 99.5% kill rate (16).

It remains to be seen to what extent the low MICs and MFCs seen in this and other studies will be predictive of clinical outcome in patients with endemic fungal infections. The tests were done with the saprotrophic mold forms of B. dermatitidis, C. immitis, and H. capsulatum, rather than the pathogenic forms. Nonetheless, our results indicate that voriconazole is a potent antifungal agent and suggest that its further clinical evaluation for patients with different forms of blastomycosis, histoplasmosis, and coccidioidomycosis is justified.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Pfizer Inc., Roerig Division, U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, for an educational grant to support this research.

	FOOTNOTES

^* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., N.E., Mailstop C-09, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-3053. Fax: (404) 639-2780. E-mail: dsw8{at}cdc.gov.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Text References

1.	Clancy, C. J., and M. H. Nguyen. 1998. In vitro efficacy and fungicidal activity of voriconazole against Aspergillus and Fusarium species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17:573-575[Medline].
2.	Cuenca-Estrella, M., B. Ruiz-Diez, J. V. Martinez-Suarez, A. Monzon, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 1999. Comparative in-vitro activity of voriconazole (UK-109-496) and six other antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Scedosporium prolificans and Scedosporium apiospermum. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:149-151[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.	Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. In vitro activity of the new triazole voriconazole (UK-109,496) against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and common and emerging yeast pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:198-202[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.	Espinel-Ingroff, A., M. Bartlett, R. Bowden, N. X. Chin, C. Cooper, A. Fothergill, M. R. McGinnis, P. Menezes, S. A. Messer, P. W. Nelson, F. C. Odds, L. Pasarell, J. Peter, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Rex, M. G. Rinaldi, G. S. Shankland, T. J. Walsh, and I. Weitzman. 1997. Multicenter evaluation of proposed standardized procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:139-143[Abstract].
5.	Gallis, H. A., R. H. Drew, and W. W. Pickard. 1990. Amphotericin B: 30 years of clinical use. Rev. Infect. Dis. 12:308-329[Medline].
6.	Johnson, E. M., A. Szekely, and D. W. Warnock. 1998. In-vitro activity of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B against filamentous fungi. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:741-745[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.	Kauffman, C. A. 1996. Role of azoles in antifungal therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22(Suppl. 2):S148-S153.
8.	Kauffman, C. A., and L. T. Zarins. 1998. In vitro activity of voriconazole against Candida species. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:297-300[CrossRef][Medline].
9.	McGinnis, M. R., L. Pasarell, D. A. Sutton, A. W. Fothergill, C. R. Cooper, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1997. In vitro evaluation of voriconazole against some clinically important fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1832-1834[Abstract].
10.	National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard. Document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
11.	Nguyen, M. H., C. J. Clancy, V. L. Yu, Y. C. Yu, A. J. Morris, D. R. Snydman, D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1998. Do in vitro susceptibility data predict the microbiologic response to amphotericin B? Results of a prospective study of patients with Candida fungemia. J. Infect. Dis. 177:425-430[Medline].
12.	Nguyen, M. H., and C. Y. Yu. 1998. In vitro comparative efficacy of voriconazole and itraconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:471-472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.	Oakley, K. L., C. B. Moore, and D. W. Denning. 1998. In-vitro activity of voriconazole against Aspergillus spp. and comparison with itraconazole and amphotericin B. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:91-94[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.	Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, G. V. Doern, M. E. Brandt, and R. A. Hajjeh. 1998. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates to the new triazole antifungal agents BMS-207147, Sch 56592, and voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:3242-3244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.	Radford, S. A., E. M. Johnson, and D. W. Warnock. 1997. In vitro studies of activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496), a new triazole antifungal agent, against emerging and less-common mold pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:841-843[Abstract].
16.	Sutton, D. A., S. E. Sanche, S. G. Revankar, A. W. Fothergill, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1999. In vitro amphotericin B resistance in clinical isolates of Aspergillus terreus, with a head-to-head comparison to voriconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2343-2345[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.	Verweij, P. E., M. Mensink, A. J. M. M. Rijs, J. P. Donnelly, J. F. G. M. Meis, and D. W. Denning. 1998. In-vitro activities of amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole against 150 clinical and environmental Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:389-392[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.	Walsh, T. J., G. P. Melcher, M. G. Rinaldi, J. Lecciones, D. McGough, J. Lee, D. Callender, M. Rubin, and P. A. Pizzo. 1990. Disseminated trichosporonosis resistant to amphotericin B. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1616-1622[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.	Wong-Beringer, A., R. A. Jacobs, and B. J. Guglielmo. 1998. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: clinical efficacies and toxicities. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:603-618[Medline].

---

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2000, p. 1734-1736, Vol. 44, No. 6
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ta, M., Flowers, S. A, Rogers, P D. (2009). The Role of Voriconazole in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Blastomycosis. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 43: 1696-1700 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Freifeld, A., Proia, L., Andes, D., Baddour, L. M., Blair, J., Spellberg, B., Arnold, S., Lentnek, A., Wheat, L. J. (2009). Voriconazole Use for Endemic Fungal Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1648-1651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Karlsson, M. O., Lutsar, I., Milligan, P. A. (2009). Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Voriconazole Plasma Concentration Data from Pediatric Studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 935-944 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stanga, S. D., Dajud, M. V. (2008). Visual Changes in a 4-Year-Old. CLIN PEDIATR 47: 959-961  
• Gluckman, S. J. (2008). Acute Respiratory Infections in a Recently Arrived Traveler to Your Part of the World. Chest 134: 163-171 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kauffman, C. A. (2007). Histoplasmosis: a Clinical and Laboratory Update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 115-132 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Krishnan, S., Manavathu, E. K., Chandrasekar, P. H. (2005). A comparative study of fungicidal activities of voriconazole and amphotericin B against hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 914-920 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ahmed, A. O. A., van de Sande, W. W. J., van Vianen, W., van Belkum, A., Fahal, A. H., Verbrugh, H. A., Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. J. M. (2004). In Vitro Susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to Itraconazole and Amphotericin B Assessed by a Modified NCCLS Method and a Viability-Based 2,3-Bis(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5- Sulfophenyl)-5-[(Phenylamino)Carbonyl]-2H- Tetrazolium Hydroxide (XTT) Assay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 2742-2746 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Proia, L. A., Tenorio, A. R. (2004). Successful Use of Voriconazole for Treatment of Coccidioides Meningitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 2341-2341 [Full Text]  
• Pearson, M. M, Rogers, P D., Cleary, J. D, Chapman, S. W (2003). Voriconazole: A New Triazole Antifungal Agent. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 37: 420-432 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• van Duin, D., Casadevall, A., Nosanchuk, J. D. (2002). Melanization of Cryptococcus neoformans and Histoplasma capsulatum Reduces Their Susceptibilities to Amphotericin B and Caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 3394-3400 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Espinel-Ingroff, A., Fothergill, A., Peter, J., Rinaldi, M. G., Walsh, T. J. (2002). Testing Conditions for Determination of Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations of New and Established Antifungal Agents for Aspergillus spp.: NCCLS Collaborative Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3204-3208 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2002). Voriconazole. JWatch Infect. Diseases 2002: 5-5 [Full Text]  
• Espinel-Ingroff, A. (2001). In Vitro Fungicidal Activities of Voriconazole, Itraconazole, and Amphotericin B against Opportunistic Moniliaceous and Dematiaceous Fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 954-958 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, R.-K. Articles by McGinnis, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, R.-K. Articles by McGinnis, M. R.