Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2000, p. 1743-1744, Vol. 44, No. 6
Department of Internal Medicine Specialties,
Section of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,1 and
Fraunhofer IGB, Stuttgart, Germany2
Received 30 November 1999/Returned for modification 2 February
2000/Accepted 11 March 2000
Cyclic AMP (cAMP) is involved in the stress response in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that cAMP is
required for resistance to fluconazole in S. cerevisiae. In addition, activation of Ras2, a
regulator of cAMP generation, results in some protection from fluconazole toxicity in a fashion independent of the efflux transporter Pdr5p.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
a genetically tractable fungus related to Candida albicans,
is an attractive organism for the study of fluconazole resistance
(4). Despite advances in understanding the mechanisms of
fluconazole resistance in S. cerevisiae, however, the
components of the response pathways are not fully known.
In S. cerevisiae, the RAS1 and RAS2
genes are activators of adenylate cyclase, which catalyzes the
formation of cyclic AMP (cAMP), a central signaling molecule
(10). Ras1p and Ras2p are highly homologous to the mammalian
ras proteins (10). Activation of mammalian
ras has been shown to affect the sensitivity of tumors to
various antineoplastic agents via activation of the MDR-1
(multidrug resistance) gene, which is the mammalian homologue of
PDR5 (1, 3). Since an important mechanism of
fluconazole resistance in S. cerevisiae is mediated by
PDR5 (pleiotropic drug resistance 5), an efflux transporter
(2, 4), we examined whether cAMP and activation of the Ras
pathway in S. cerevisiae similarly affect the resistance to fluconazole.
cAMP is required for resistance to fluconazole.
Standard
procedures to prepare the media and to manipulate S. cerevisiae were used (5). To test whether cAMP has a
function in resistance to fluconazole we used a strain in which
internal cAMP levels can be changed by the addition of cAMP to the
medium (strain SR 959 [MATa/
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cyclic AMP and Fluconazole Resistance in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
ras1/ras1 ras2/ras2
pde2/pde2] [7]). Thus, we can mimic functions of
Ras connected to changing cAMP levels in the cell by changing external
cAMP concentrations (7). Despite its very low intracellular
cAMP level, the SR959 mutant does not require external cAMP for growth
on synthetic complete (SC) medium (7). We compared the
sensitivity of strain SR959 to fluconazole with that of the isogenic
wild type (SR607 [7]) in the presence or absence of
cAMP. As shown in Table 1, SR959 was very
sensitive to fluconazole (100 µg in a paper disk by applying 20 µl
of a 5-mg/ml solution in sterile water) in the absence of cAMP on SC
medium (zone of inhibition [ZI], 51 ± 1 mm). Addition of 0.1 mM
cAMP to the medium restored resistance to fluconazole to wild-type
levels (ZI, 38 ± 1 mm [Table 1]). Higher concentrations of cAMP
(1 mM) did not increase the resistance to fluconazole appreciably (ZI,
36 ± 1 mm). Similarly, the sensitivity of SR607 (wild type) to
fluconazole was not affected significantly by the addition of 1 mM cAMP
(ZI, 36 ± 1 and 34 ± 1 mm respectively [Table 1]). The
plates were grown at 30°C for 24 h. Experiments were done in
triplicate at different time points. These results could be interpreted
as evidence that cAMP is required for activation of response mechanisms
to protect the cell from fluconazole. The lack of a significantly
increased resistance in the wild type by increased amounts of exogenous
cAMP can be explained by the known resistance of wild-type strains to
external cAMP and by the high internal levels of cAMP in wild-type
cells (11).
TABLE 1.
Effects of cAMP and activated Ras on
fluconazole resistance
in S. cerevisiaea
Expression of RAS2Val19 results in resistance to fluconazole in a PDR5-independent fashion. RAS2Val19 is a well-characterized dominant active allele of RAS2 (10). We transformed the Saccharomyces strain 10560-14C (MATa ura3-52 leu2::hisG his3::hisG [supplied by the Fink laboratory]) and DK 13-5D (MATa pdr5::Tn3::LEU2::lacZ ura3-52::leu2::hisG [6]) with either a single-copy plasmid containing URA3 as a selection marker and the allele RAS2Val19 (S. Rupp, unpublished data) or with a URA3 plasmid containing no insert (pRS316 [8]). We selected the corresponding Ura+ transformants (10560-14C/URA3, pdr5/URA3, 10560-14C/URA3-RAS2Val19, and pdr5/URA3-RAS2Val19) in SC-uracil plates. To compare the fluconazole sensitivities of 10560-14C and DK13-5D with those of the respective isogenic strains expressing RAS2Val19, the resulting strains were inoculated in 5 ml of liquid SC-uracil medium. Cultures were grown to saturation at 30°C, diluted (1:1,000) in 10 ml of SC-uracil medium, and grown at 30°C into late log phase. Yeast growth was examined by spreading approximately 105 cells of each culture on SC-uracil plates containing 100 µg of fluconazole in a paper disk. Growth on plates at 30°C was evaluated for 24 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate at different time points. As shown in Table 1, the expression of RAS2Val19 resulted in a small increase in fluconazole resistance in both the 10560-14C/RAS2Val19 (ZI, 38 ± 1 mm in 10560-14C; ZI, 33 ± 2 mm in 10560-14C/RAS2Val19) and in DK13-5D/Ras2Val19 strains respectively (ZI, 52 ± 1 mm in DK13-5D; ZI, 44 ± 2 mm in DK13-5D/Ras2Val19). The observed small protective effect in strains expressing Ras2Val19 was not specific to fluconazole, because protection from cycloheximide (5 µg in a paper disk) was also seen in these strains on SC-uracil plates. On the other hand, toxicity from 5-fluorocytosine (50 µg in a paper disk) was no different in the strains expressing Ras2Val19 (data not shown). Cycloheximide but not 5-fluorouracil is a substrate of Pdr5p (2).
In conclusion, our data suggest that cAMP is required for resistance to fluconazole. This is in agreement with our finding that the activation of the Ras pathway exerts some protective effect against fluconazole toxicity in Saccharomyces. The exact mechanism of protection is not known. However, cAMP and the Ras pathway may regulate either directly or indirectly the major facilitator superfamily network of transporters and thus the efficiency of drug efflux in Saccharomyces. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that CDC25, an upstream regulator of RAS2, affects the activity of the major facilitator superfamily glucose transporters (9). Elucidation of the role of cAMP in azole resistance could shed light on the mechanisms of resistance of the inherently resistant pathogenic fungi.| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Part of this work was performed at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Fink laboratory) where D.P.K. was a fellow in the Clinical Investigator Training Program (supported by Pfizer, Inc.) at the Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Mass., and a fellow in Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. This work was also supported by the Cancer Center (Core) Grant (CA16672) from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
We thank members of the Fink laboratory for helpful advice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Section of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Box 47, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-6237. Fax: (713) 794-4351. E-mail: dkontoyi{at}notes.mdacc.tmc.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Chin, K. V.,
K. Ueda,
I. Pastan, and M. M. Gottesman.
1992.
Modulation of activity of the promoter of the human MDR1 gene by ras and p53.
Science
255:459-462 |
| 2. | Decottignies, A., and A. Goffeau. 1997. Complete inventory of the yeast ABC proteins. Nat. Genet. 15:137-145[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Grunicke, H., J. Hofmann, I. Utz, and F. Überall. 1994. Role of protein kinases in antitumor drug resistance. Ann. Hematol. 69:S1-S6. |
| 4. | Joseph-Horne, T., and D. W. Hollomon. 1997. Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 149:141-149[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Kaiser, C., S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchell. 1994. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y. |
| 6. |
Kontoyiannis, D. P.
1999.
Genetic analysis of azole resistance by transposon mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43:2731-2735 |
| 7. | Rupp, S., E. Summers, H.-J. Lo, et al. 1999. MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the usually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene. EMBO J. 18:1257-1269[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter.
1989.
A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
122:19-27 |
| 9. |
Sillje, H. H.,
E. G. ter Schure,
A. J. Verkleij, et al.
1996.
The Cdc25 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for normal glucose transport.
Microbiol.
142:1765-1773 |
| 10. | Toda, T., I. Uno, T. Ishikawa, et al. 1985. In yeast, Ras proteins are controlling elements of adenylate cyclase. Cell 40:27-36[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Wilson, R. B., G. Renault, M. Jacquet, et al. 1993. The pde2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is allelic to rca1 and encodes a phosphodiesterase which protects the cell from extracellular cAMP. FEBS Lett. 325:191-195[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»