Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2000, p. 1961-1963, Vol. 44, No. 7
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Modulation of Erm Methyltransferase Activity by
Peptides Derived from Phage Display
Robert B.
Giannattasio and
Bernard
Weisblum*
Pharmacology Department, University of
Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received 24 November 1999/Returned for modification 2 February
2000/Accepted 26 April 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Combinatorial peptide display on phage M13 protein pIII was used to
discover peptide sequences that selectively bind to ErmC' methyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis. One peptide,
Ac-LSGVIAT-NH2, inhibited methylation in vitro with a 50%
inhibitory concentration of 20 µM. Interestingly, the set of six
peptides which inhibited ErmC' stimulated ErmSF, a homologous
methyltransferase from Streptomyces fradiae. Thus,
Ac-LSGVIAT-NH2 may not act directly at the catalytic center
of ErmC', but may modulate its activity by binding at a structurally
unrelated, but functionally linked, site.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ErmC
N-methyltransferase of Staphylococcus aureus and
its close relative ErmC' from Bacillus subtilis confer
resistance to erythromycin and related macrolide antibiotics. These
enzymes act by specifically methylating a single adenine residue in the peptidyl transferase center of bacterial 23S rRNA (for reviews, see
references 7 and 8). The same
methylation confers coresistance to structurally unrelated lincosamide
and streptogramin type B antibiotics. The three groups are collectively
known as the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS) antibiotics,
and the form of resistance based on the Erm group of methyltransferases
is found in a wide range of pathogens. The three-dimensional structures
of the ErmAM and ErmC' methyltransferases have recently been solved by
nuclear magnetic resonance (3, 9) and X-ray crystallography
(1, 5), respectively. These developments bring us closer to
rationally devising ligands that will selectively bind to Erm enzymes
and possibly reduce the efficiency with which they confer MLS resistance.
Macrolide antibiotics have served as a mainstay of antimicrobial
therapy for approximately the last half century, especially in
instances where the recipient of the antibiotic was allergic to
beta-lactam antibiotics. Attempts have been made to discover Erm
methyltransferase inhibitors that maintain the effectiveness of
macrolide antibiotics in the face of the increasing frequency of
resistant isolates (2, 3). The latter work (3)
was part of a series of major structural studies of Erm
methyltransferases (1, 5, 9).
Nonpeptide ligands which displace an inhibitory peptide from its
binding site on the enzyme might, themselves, have inhibitory activity.
The use of inhibitory peptides might thus serve as a platform for the
discovery of nonpeptide inhibitors of Erm enzymes. A proposed way to
achieve this would be based on the discovery of test ligands to
displace an inhibitory peptide from its association with its cognate
Erm target. The displacement of an inhibitory ligand would also be
easier to measure than methyltransferase activity.
Large-scale screening of inhibitory ligands by a direct assay of
methyltransferase catalytic activity is cumbersome since it requires
the separation of product (methyl-labeled 23S rRNA) from substrate
(unreacted S-adenosyl-L-methionine). We report the use of combinatorial phage display to discover peptides that inhibit ErmC' methylase activity and which might serve as displaceable ligands in a more efficient, broader assay for prospective
methyltransferase inhibitors.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Phage display.
Phage display was performed as described by
Sparks et al. (6) by using a combinatorial peptide library
specified by seven random codons, (NNK)7, where N denotes
one of the four bases A, G, C, or T, and K denotes one of the two bases
G or T (New England Biolabs). ErmC' (1) was a gift of Abbott
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ErmC' was originally derived from B. subtilis but was overexpressed in Escherichia coli from
which it was purified. ErmSF was purified, and its activity was tested
as described previously (4), along with that of ErmC'. The
peptide specified by the combinatorial cassette was determined at the
DNA level by the use of 5' TAA GTG GAG CTT TCG TTC GAC 3' as sequencing
primer. This sequence is a part of the gene for M13 phage protein pIII
on which the combinatorial peptide is displayed (6).
Effect of chemically synthesized peptides on Erm activity.
Peptides used for testing inhibitory activity were chemically
synthesized (Research Genetics, Huntsville, Ala.) with
N-acetyl- and C-amide modifications, respectively. The
inhibitory (or stimulatory) activity of the chemically synthesized
combinatorial peptides on the N-methyltransferase activity
of ErmC' and ErmSF was tested in triplicate at the stated
concentrations. The complete system reaction mixture contained the
following in a 50-µl total volume: 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5; 4 mM
MgCl2; 4 mM KCl; 40 mM dithiothreitol; 6 µM
S-adenosyl-L-methionine, 75 Ci/mM; 10 U of
RNasin; 207 ng of ErmC' or ErmSF, as indicated; and 7.5 pmol of
B. subtilis rRNA. Erythromycin-resistant (ermC)
B. subtilis was used as the source of negative control rRNA.
Incubation was at 37°C for 20 min. Reactions were phenol extracted,
trichloroacetic acid-precipitated, filtered, and counted in a liquid
scintillation spectrometer.
 |
RESULTS |
Peptides derived from phage display.
To find peptides that
bind to ErmC' from B. subtilis, the random heptamer peptide
library (NNK)7 displayed on phage M13 protein pIII was
panned for the ability to bind to ErmC'-coated microtiter plate wells
as described by Sparks et al. (6). Forty-eight phage clones
were obtained which showed binding to the coated wells as determined by
phage enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Of these, six that showed
fivefold higher binding to ErmC'-coated wells, compared to bovine serum
albumin-coated wells, were selected for further study. The respective
active peptides were chemically synthesized (Research Genetics) by the
solid-phase method and were tested for the ability to inhibit the
catalytic activity of ErmC'.
Test for ability to inhibit ErmC' methyltransferase catalytic
activity.
All six peptides were tested in triplicate at 50 µg/ml
(approximately 50 µM) for their ability to inhibit, in vitro,
methylation of 23S rRNA by ErmC'. Results shown in Table
1 indicate that all six peptides were
inhibitory to various degrees. As controls for the sequence specificity
of the peptides, randomized peptides rnd 5 and rnd 6, based on the
amino acid compositions of peptides 5 and 6, were synthesized and
tested. The randomized peptides showed little if any inhibitory
activity. Activity associated with some of the peptides seemed to show
a high standard deviation. We believe that the phenol extraction step
in the assay contributed a solid-phase component that traps methylated
RNA along with denatured proteins to variable degrees in the different
experimental test samples. Some samples showed a lower standard
deviation, both in this set of experiments and in those described
below.
Concentration dependence for inhibition of methylation.
The
concentration dependence of peptide 6 for inhibition of methylation by
ErmC' was tested along with ErmSF from Streptomyces fradiae,
which was included for a comparison of enzyme specificity. The
concentration dependence of rnd 6 acting on ErmC' was also tested. The
results shown in Fig. 1 indicate that
peptide 6 inhibited methylation with a 50% inhibitory concentration
between 3 and 10 µM, whereas rnd 6 had only a slight effect in this
concentration range. Surprisingly, ErmSF activity was enhanced by
peptide 6, whereas rnd had only a small effect on methylation catalyzed
by ErmSF.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The results of a test of the action of peptide 6, Ac-LSGVIAT-NH2, and scrambled peptide 6 (referred to in
Table 1 as rnd 6), Ac-ATSVILG-NH2, on methylation of 23S
rRNA by ErmC'. The effect of peptide 6 on methylation of 23S rRNA by
ErmSF was included for comparison. All values were determined in
triplicate and were normalized to the unsupplemented control.
|
|
Test for ability to inhibit ErmSF methyltransferase catalytic
activity.
We next asked whether other peptides would stimulate at
50 µg/ml (approximately 50 µM). The results shown in Table
2 indicate that individual peptides
either stimulated ErmSF or had no effect. Also, rnd 5 and rnd 6 appeared to have no effect on ErmSF. Moreover, the ability of a peptide
to inhibit ErmC' did not appear to correlate with its ability to
stimulate ErmSF.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Drug discovery programs generally seek inhibitors, rather than
potentiators, of enzyme function, and published studies appear to favor
the search for inhibitors of the catalytic center of the target
protein. S-adenosyl homocysteine inhibits the catalytic activity of methyltransferases by binding to the active center. S-adenosyl homocysteine was unable, at concentrations up to
1 mM, to compete with phage carrying peptide 6 for binding to ErmC' (data not shown). These observations suggest that peptide 6 does not
act at the active site of ErmC' methyltransferase. In the present set
of experiments, we have shown that all of the combinatorial peptides
selected for binding to ErmC' inhibited ErmC' methyltransferase activity, albeit to different degrees, but also stimulated ErmSF activity. These findings suggest that one might be able to screen for
agents that potentiate the activity of a given enzyme by initially screening for inhibitors of a homolog.
In summary, peptides have been obtained with the help of
phage-displayed peptides which inhibit the activity of ErmC' but stimulate the activity of a homolog, ErmSF. The results of these studies may serve as a model for the discovery of enzyme potentiators as well as an efficient assay for inhibitors of the enzymatic activity
of Erm methyltransferases.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Brian K. Kay for introducing us to phage display and
Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for a gift of purified ErmC'.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pharmacology
Department, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1300 University
Ave., Madison, WI 53706. Phone: (608) 262-0972. Fax: (608) 262-1257. E-mail: weisblum{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bussiere, D. E.,
S. W. Muchmore,
C. G. Dealwis,
G. Schluckebier,
V. L. Nienaber,
R. P. Edalji,
K. A. Walter,
U. S. Ladror,
T. F. Holzman, and C. Abad-Zapatero.
1998.
Crystal structure of ErmC', an rRNA methyltransferase which mediates antibiotic resistance in bacteria.
Biochemistry
37:7103-7112[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Clancy, J.,
B. J. Schmieder,
J. W. Petitpas,
M. Manousos,
J. A. Williams,
J. A. Faiella,
A. E. Girard, and P. R. McGuirk.
1995.
Assays to detect and characterize synthetic agents that inhibit the ErmC methyltransferase.
J. Antibiot.
48:1273-1279[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Hajduk, P. J.,
J. Dinges,
J. M. Schkeryantz,
D. Janowick,
M. Kaminski,
M. Tufano,
D. J. Augeri,
A. Petros,
V. Nienaber,
P. Zhong,
R. Hammond,
M. Coen,
B. Beutel,
L. Katz, and S. W. Fesik.
1999.
Novel inhibitors of Erm methyltransferases from NMR and parallel synthesis.
J. Med. Chem.
42:3852-3859[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Kovalic, D.,
R. B. Giannattasio,
H. J. Jin, and B. Weisblum.
1994.
23S rRNA domain V, a fragment that can be specifically methylated in vitro by the ErmSF (TlrA) methyltransferase.
J. Bacteriol.
176:6992-6998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Schluckebier, G.,
P. Zhong,
K. D. Stewart,
T. J. Kavanaugh, and C. Abad-Zapatero.
1999.
The 2.2 Å structure of the rRNA methyltransferase ErmC' and its complexes with cofactor and cofactor analogs: implications for the reaction mechanism.
J. Mol. Biol.
289:277-291[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Sparks, A.,
N. Adey,
S. Cwirla, and B. K. Kay.
1996.
Chapter 13, p. 227-253.
In
B. K. Kay, J. Winter, and J. McCafferty (ed.), Phage display of peptides and proteins: a laboratory manual. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 7.
|
Weisblum, B.
1995.
Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:577-585[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Weisblum, B.
1995.
Insights into erythromycin action from studies of its activity as inducer of resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:797-805[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Yu, L.,
A. M. Petros,
A. Schnuchel,
P. Zhong,
J. M. Severin,
K. Walter,
T. F. Holzman, and S. W. Fesik.
1997.
Solution structure of an rRNA methyltransferase (ErmAM) that confers macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin antibiotic resistance.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4:483-489[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2000, p. 1961-1963, Vol. 44, No. 7
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.