Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2000, p. 2173-2175, Vol. 44, No. 8
HIV Neurobehavioral Research
Center1 and Pediatric Pharmacology
Research Unit,2 University of California,
San Diego, California
Received 10 August 1999/Returned for modification 16 December
1999/Accepted 25 April 2000
Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indinavir concentrations were
measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The median
concentration in plasma exceeded that in CSF 10-fold. The modeled CSF
curve was flat at 155 nM, and the estimated ratio of the areas under
the CSF and plasma concentration-time curves was 6%. We conclude that
CSF indinavir concentrations are lower than levels in plasma but exceed
the clinical 95% inhibitory concentration range.
Combining nucleoside analogue
reverse transcriptase inhibitors with protease inhibitors (PIs) can
dramatically reduce viral replication, preserve immune function, and
prolong survival. Combination regimens may also reduce human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication in the cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF) (1, 6, 9, 13; M. Gisslen, L. Hagberg, B. Svennerholm, and G. Norkrans, Letter, AIDS 11:1194, 1997).
However, the independent contribution of PIs to such reductions is
unclear since PIs are highly protein bound and, therefore, may not
reach therapeutic concentrations in the central nervous system (CNS)
(1, 5). In fact, the failure of PIs to consistently control
HIV replication in the CNS is supported by clinical studies (7; E. H. Gisolf, S. Juriaans, M. E. van
der Ende, P. Portegies, R. Hoetelmans, and S. A. Danner, Sixth
Conf. Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect., poster 403, 1999).
Among the currently available PIs, indinavir (IDV) binds the least to
plasma proteins (~60%), which suggests that it may penetrate into
the CNS well enough to be efficacious (8). Prior studies have demonstrated that IDV levels in CSF are similar to trough levels
in serum (L. Stahle, C. Martin, J. O. Svensson, and A. Sonnerborg,
Letter, Lancet 350:1823, 1997), vary little over the dosing
interval (Stahle et al., letter), and are similar to or exceed a 95%
inhibitory concentration (IC95) range for clinical isolates
(25 to 100 nM) (K. Brinkman, F. Kroon, P. W. Hugen, and D. M. Burger, Letter, AIDS 12:537, 1998; A. C. Collier, C. Marra, R. W. Coombs, L. Zhong, J. Stone, and B.-Y. Nguyen, IDSA
35th Annu. Meet., abstr., Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:359, 1997).
These studies estimated the CNS penetration of IDV by calculating the
ratios of the concentrations in CSF and plasma. This method produces an
estimate of drug exposure that is limited by its sensitivity to the
interval between dosing and sample collection.
Since the ratio of the areas under the CSF and plasma concentration
curves (AUCCSF/AUCplasma) accounts for
variability over the entire dosing interval, it is a more accurate
estimate of CSF penetration over time than the ratio of the
concentrations in CSF and plasma (3, 8, 12). Martin and
colleagues used pharmacokinetic modeling to support a role for active
transport of IDV out of the CSF (9). In this study, we used
population pharmacokinetic (PPK) methods to estimate the IDV
AUCCSF/AUCplasma ratio.
Twenty-two matched CSF and plasma samples from 22 adults were selected
from the specimen bank of the HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. All
patients were at steady state on IDV-containing antiretroviral regimens
and were free of opportunistic conditions. All 22 subjects took 800 mg
of IDV orally every 8 h with either stavudine-lamivudine (3TC) (13 of 22), zidovudine-3TC (7 of 22), stavudine-dideoxycytosine (1 of 22)
or 3TC alone (1 of 22).
Blood and CSF samples were obtained within 2 h of each other. IDV
levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
at Merck Research Laboratories (West Point, Pa.). The CSF assay was
validated over the range of 2.8 to 2,800 nM and had a precision of
<10% of the coefficient of variation. The plasma assay was validated
over the range of 7 to 2,800 nM and also had a precision of <10% of
the coefficient of variation. HIV RNA levels were measured by reverse
transcription-PCR (Amplicor; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg,
N.J.) with a lower limit of quantitation of 50 copies/ml. Blood CD4
counts, CSF white blood cell counts, and protein levels in plasma and
CSF were also determined.
PPK parameters were estimated with NONMEM software (2) using
a two-compartment physiologic model (Advan4 Trans1). Monte Carlo
simulations were performed to estimate model-predicted quartile concentrations. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed using JMP software (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.).
All patients were male. Subjects had broad ranges of CD4 counts (49 to
847 cells/mm3; median, 243) and HIV RNA levels in CSF (1.7 to 3.8 log10 copies/ml; median, 1.7) and plasma (1.7 to 5.0 log10 copies/ml; median, 2.6). Levels of HIV RNA in plasma
were approximately 1 log10 higher than in CSF, consistent
with experience in larger studies (4, 10). The median CSF
white blood cell count was 1 cell/mm3 (range, 1 to 5) and
the median protein concentrations were 7,500 mg/dl in plasma (range,
6,100 to 9,000) and 38 mg/dl in CSF (range, 26 to 120).
Median IDV concentrations were 1,491 nM (range, 40 to 11,670) in plasma
and 145 nM (range, 43 to 480) in CSF. Because of falling concentrations
in plasma, the CSF/plasma IDV ratio increased across the dosing
interval (median, 0.16; range, 0.004 to 2.28). PPK modeling (Fig.
1) estimated the maximum plasma IDV
concentration to be 3,500 nM. The CSF curve was flat at approximately
155 nM, likely due to slow influx to and efflux from the CSF
compartment. This concentration approximated the modeled minimum IDV
concentration (Cmin) in plasma at a dose of 800 mg every 8 h. Table 1 summarizes the
pharmacokinetic parameters and intersubject variability for the model.
The fraction of IDV that penetrated into CSF from plasma, an estimate
of the AUCCSF/AUCplasma ratio, was 6% (95%
confidence interval, 5 to 9%).
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Indinavir Population Pharmacokinetics in Plasma
and Cerebrospinal Fluid
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Plasma and CSF IDV concentrations by postdose time.
Levels in plasma (circles) peaked within 2 h after dosing and then
gradually declined over the remaining dosing interval. Levels in CSF
(squares) remained flat, suggesting that IDV influx and efflux were
balanced. One patient who probably misreported his dosing time was
excluded from the model. Modeled median IDV concentrations are
represented by a solid (plasma) or dashed (CSF) line. Dotted lines
represent the modeled curves for the 1st and 3rd quartiles.
TABLE 1.
Pharmacokinetic parameters and
intersubject variabilitya
The data were well described by the model with no significant biases, and modeled estimates were similar to published data (9, 14), including substantial intersubject variability. Considering possible sources of biological, assay, and modeling variation, the calculated residual model errors were 25% for concentrations in plasma and 52% for concentrations in CSF.
All CSF IDV levels exceeded 25 nM and 12 of 22 (54%) exceeded 100 nM, the limits of the clinical IC95 range. CSF HIV RNA levels were less than 50 copies/ml in 15 of 22 samples (68%) at the time of collection. CSF HIV RNA detection was not associated either with the specific antiretroviral regimen or with CSF IDV levels in individual patients exceeding the upper limit of the clinical IC95 range.
Our findings are consistent with prior studies: CSF IDV levels varied little over the dosing interval and approximated both trough levels in plasma and the clinical IC95 range. Specifically, the modeled CSF PPK curve was flat at approximately 155 nM, a level that exceeds the upper limit of the clinical IC95 range by 55%. Despite this, the measured IDV concentrations in 10 of 22 (45%) patients were less than 100 nM. However, the clinical significance of this finding cannot be interpreted without directly measuring the IDV susceptibility of each patient's CSF viral population.
Although our HPLC-based assay measured both free and protein-bound
drug, only the unbound fraction has antiviral activity. However, the
low CSF-to-plasma protein ratio (1:200) probably reflects a similar
ratio of drug-binding proteins, such as
1-acid glycoprotein. With low levels of drug-binding proteins in CSF, the
unbound fraction of IDV approximates the total measured concentration and may sometimes exceed the unbound fraction in plasma. For example, although the median concentration in CSF and the
Cmin in plasma were equivalent in our model, the
estimated unbound fraction in CSF (~100%, or 155 nM) exceeded the
estimated unbound Cmin in plasma (40% of 155 nM, or 62 nM) 2.5-fold.
We found that isolated CSF IDV/plasma IDV ratio measurements inadequately described CSF penetration since the ratios vary more than 100-fold depending on the postdose collection time. By estimating the AUCCSF/AUCplasma ratio through PPK modeling, we avoided the sampling bias inherent in this measure and demonstrated that CSF IDV concentrations exceed the clinical IC95 range even though only 6% of levels in plasma enter this compartment. These CSF levels are sustained throughout the dosing interval and may contribute to the antiretroviral activity of combination regimens that contain better-penetrating agents.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
S. L. Letendre received salary support from an NIH AIDS Training Grant (AI 07384). The HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center is funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (1 PO1 DA12065-01A1). The study was partially supported with a research grant from Merck Research Laboratories and by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (RO1-MH-58076-04).
We acknowledge Debbie Durand for her assistance in selecting specimens, Sandy Rawlins at Merck for coordinating support, and Julie Stone at Merck Research Laboratories for performing the HPLC assays.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center, University of California, San Diego, 150 W. Washington St., San Diego, CA 92103. Phone: (619) 543-4730. Fax: (619) 543-1235. E-mail: sletendre{at}ucsd.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aweeka, F., A. Jayewardene, S. Staprans, S. E. Bellibas, B. Kearney, P. Lizak, T. Novakovic-Agopian, and R. W. Price. 1999. Failure to detect nelfinavir in the cerebrospinal fluid of HIV-1-infected patients with and without AIDS dementia complex. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 20:39-43[Medline]. |
| 2. | Beal, S. L., and L. B. Sheiner (ed.). 1992. NONMEN user guides. NONMEN Project Group, University of California, San Francisco. |
| 3. | Cherubin, C. E., R. H. K. Eng, R. Norrby, J. Modai, G. Humbert, and G. Overturf. 1994. Penetration of newer cephalosporins into cerebrospinal fluid. Rev. Infect. Dis. 11:526-548. |
| 4. | Ellis, R. J., K. Hsia, S. A. Spector, J. A. Nelson, R. K. Heaton, M. R. Wallace, I. Abramson, J. H. Atkinson, I. Grant, and J. A. McCutchan. 1997. Cerebrospinal fluid human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels are elevated in neurocognitively impaired individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group. Ann. Neurol. 42:679-688[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Enting, R. H., R. M. Hoetelmans, J. M. Lange, D. M. Burger, J. H. Beijnen, and P. Portegies. 1998. Antiretroviral drugs and the central nervous system. AIDS 12:1941-1955[Medline]. |
| 6. | Foudraine, N. A., R. M. Hoetelmans, J. M. Lange, F. de Wolf, B. H. van Benthem, J. J. Maas, I. P. Keet, and P. Portegies. 1998. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 RNA and drug concentrations after treatment with lamivudine plus zidovudine or stavudine. Lancet 351:1547-1551[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Kravcik, S., A. Gallicano, V. Roth, S. Cassol, N. Hawley-Foss, A. Badley, and D. W. Cameron. 1999. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA and drug levels with combination ritonavir and saquinavir. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 21:371-375. |
| 8. | Lutsar, I., G. H. McCracken, Jr., and I. R. Friedland. 1998. Antibiotic pharmacodynamics in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:1117-1127[Medline]. |
| 9. | Martin, C., A. Sonnerborg, J. O. Svensson, and L. Stahle. 1999. Indinavir-based treatment of HIV-1 infected patients: efficacy in the central nervous system. AIDS 13:1227-1232[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | McArthur, J. C., D. R. McClernon, M. F. Cronin, T. E. Nance-Sproson, A. J. Saah, M. St. Clair, and E. R. Lanier. 1997. Relationship between human immunodeficiency virus-associated dementia and viral load in cerebrospinal fluid and brain. Ann. Neurol. 42:689-698[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Mueller, B. U.,
L. L. Lewis,
G. J. Yuen,
M. Farley,
A. Keller,
J. A. Church,
J. C. Goldsmith,
D. J. Venzon,
M. Rubin,
P. A. Pizzo, and F. M. Balis.
1998.
Serum and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral lamivudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42:3187-3192 |
| 12. | Nau, R., G. Zysk, A. Thiel, and H. W. Prange. 1993. Pharmacokinetic quantification of the exchange of drugs between blood and cerebrospinal fluid in man. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 45:469-475[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Pialoux, G., S. Fournier, A. Moulignier, J. D. Poveda, F. Clavel, and B. Dupont. 1997. Central nervous system as a sanctuary for HIV-1 infection despite treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir. AIDS 11:1302-1303[Medline]. |
| 14. | Stein, D. S., D. G. Fish, J. A. Bilello, S. L. Preston, G. L. Martineau, and G. L. Drusano. 1996. A 24-week open-label phase I/II evaluation of the HIV protease inhibitor MK-639 (indinavir). AIDS 10:485-492[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»